Download prevalence of anemia and associated factors among pregnant

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Human nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Iron-deficiency anemia wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PREVALENCE OF ANEMIA AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG
PREGNANT WOMEN ATTENDING ANTENATAL IN L.BILBILO WEREDA
HEALTH FACILITY ,ARSI ZONE, SOUTH E AST ETHIOPIA.
Gebi Tufa (Bsc,BA, MPH/RH)
Outline of presentation
Introduction
Significance of the study
Methods and Materials
Result
Discussion
Conclusion
Recommendations
Introduction
 Anemia in pregnancy is defined by world health organization as hemoglobin concentration
level less than 11 (WHO,2015)
 The prevalence of anemia in developing country varies from country to country that is 33%-75%
in developing country as compared to 15% developed country (Grewal A. Anemia and
pregnancy 2014, P. Lacente,2011,WHO 2015)
•
Anemia is a public health problem over the world especially in sub Saharan Africa including
Ethiopia
• The prevalence of anemia in Africa is 62.4% and globally 42.3 peoples were anemic and
prevalence women of reproductive age 29.1%,146 countries of the world suffer from moderate
anemi,37 suffer countries from severe anemia (WHO ,2011) .
Introduction
• Even though, the prevalence is high, there is no study conducted at study area; On factors
that associated with anemia and its magnitude. So , this study is intended to estimate the
problem/fill this gap.
• Hence this study will provide more information about the burden of Anemia &associated
factors and facilitates the identification of anemia and anemia related problems found in the
study areas.
Conceptual frame work
Anemia
Sociodemograph
Age,
sex,occupation,educ
ation,residency
Nutritiona
l status
Obsteteric
charect
Parity/gravidity.
FANC
healthesrvice
related
Availability
and
acessibility,san
itation
Disease and
parasitic
infection
Dietary
diversity,variet
y,frequency
Economy and knowledge
Socio economic status
Knowledge abut anemia
(WHO:2015, Mulugeta M:2014,CSA:2007 )
5
Objectives
• General objectives
• To determine the prevalence of anemia and associated factors among pregnant women attending
ANC in Lemu Bilbilo District; 2015/16
• Specific objectives
• To determine magnitude of anemia among pregnant women attending ANC.
• To identify factors associated with anemia among pregnant women attending ANC
Methods and Material
• Institution based cross sectional study design was conducted among pregnant women in Lemu Bilbilo
Woreda Oromia regional state, South East Ethiopia 223 Km from Addis Ababa from May 20- June
20/2016
• sample size was determined by using a single population proportion formula and the final sample sizes is
367 .
• There are seven health facilities in the area and all seven health facilities within Wereda were taken.
• Proportional allocation was made for each health facilities and based on the average daily client flow in
each institution the study unit will be selected by systematic random sampling method .
• Structured interviewer administered questionnaire adapted from previous similar studies were used
• Hemoglobin was measured using portable hemocue, stool were tested for helmints
• Data was edited ,coded and was entered to Epidata Version 3.1 then exported to SPSS 20.0 and
analysed.
Result
 From the total sample size of the pregnant women the response rate were 97 %. thirty two %(115) feed
food three times per day, 47.8%( 171) less than two times per day, and 20.1%(72) greater than three times
per day.
 Thirty two %(108) practice low food diversity,78(21%) , minimum food diversity and the rest practice high
food diversity. the mean food diversity was 5±1.87.
 The most of the respondents 40.5%(145) get focused antenatal care in previous pregnancy.
 Most of the
respondents 41.5%(148) were nulliparous, 38.5%( 138) delivered one child
14%(52)
experienced abortion.
 One hundred fifty eight 44.4%(158) were less than 16 weeks, 35.6%(125) were between 24-28 weeks.
 Twenty four % (88) here diseased with different medical disorder greater than one in past one month
before collection of this data.
Result
 As far as the interview was concerned pregnant women 83.8%(252)were with normal
MUAC,26%(106) were malnourished.
 Seventy %(252) have good or adequate knowledge about anemia and information on feeding
habit that prevent anemia.
 :The overall prevalence of anemia was 22.3%. 6.15% were moderately anemic and mild anemia
is 16.2%.
 The comparison between the profiles of the pregnant women who had anemia and who did not
from the bivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that food diversity, education of women
and husband, occupation of husband and women, nutritional status ,parasite ,marital status,
gave birth, wealth index are factors that are associated with anemia.
Result
Table 1: Multivariate logistic regression model on anemia prevalence and associated factor
variables
category
Anemia
Adjusted OR
P.Value
Yes(NO./%)
NO(NO./%)
Low
27(7.5)
92(25.6)
2.4(1.1-5.6)
.031*
Mild
33(9.2)
20(5.5)
2.69(1.27-5.4)
1
.01*
High
145(40.5)
41(11.5)
Merchant
Govdaily
8(2.2)
12(3.4)
5715.9()
42(11.7)
6(2-20.1)
1.3(.54-2.9)
.001*
.597
Farming&other
Merchant
60(16.8)
16(4.4)
179(50)
43(12)
1
.31(.11-.84)
.021*
Farming
Housewife
16(4.4)
48(13.4)
76(21.2)
159(44.4)
1.31(.64-2.7)
1
Nutritional
status
Normal(=>23cm 47(13.1)
Malnutrition(<2 33(9.2)
3cm
205(57.3)
73(20.4)
1
1.8(1.00-3.2)
0.047*
Pregnancy
interval
= <2year back
76 (21.1)
245(68.4 )
.37(.115-1.193)
.096
= >5year back
4(1.1)
33(9.2)
1
nulliparous
34(9.5)
112(31.3)
1
one
27(7.5)
114(31.8)
1.7(.60-2.1)
.727
2-6
19(5.3)
52(14.5)
.902(.429-1.89)
.788
Dietary
diversity
Husband
occupation
Women
occupation
Gave birth
.0.459
Discussion
 The prevalence of anemia among pregnant women was 22..3 % .
 Seventy two %(58/80) were of the mild &27.4%% cases of moderate anemia.
 This finding was similar with the prevalence in study done in (Gonder 22%, Tikur Anbessa specialized
hospital that is 21.3%(M.Alem:2013,Alemayuh.H :2014)
 but higher than study done in Mekele 11.7%(11) and lower than study done in west Arsi zone36.6%(14)
.But, consisted with EDHS 22%(13) .(A.Abriha: 2014, NiguseObse: 2011
 Anemia in pregnancy related with different demographic (WHO: 2008,2011, F. Bánhidy 2011,Mulugeta
M2013).
 occupation of husband found to be associated with anemia. from statically analysis of multi logistic
regression husband jobs such as being Merchant is six times more anemic as compared to farming
(AOR=6.00, 95% CI: 2.1-20.1) and women occupation being merchant is 0.31 less likely anemic as
compared to those women whose occupation house wife (AOR=.31.95% CI:0.11-.84).
 According to this study pregnant women who are malnourished were 1.8 times more likely to be anemic as
compared to their counter parts.
.
…Contn…
 This finding also consisted with study done in Somali regional state MUAC less than 23cm is
found to increase the risk of developing anemia. According to this finding pregnant women with
MUAC ≥ 23cm had 59% less risk of developing anemia (37).
• This can be explained by the fact that undernourished pregnant women have a higher
probability of being micronutrient deficient and which can leads iron deficient and anemic.
•
According to this study pregnant women who practice mild dietary diversity were 2.69 more
likely anemic as compared to those who practice high dietary diversity.
• This finding is consisted with study done in rural part of Ethiopia and Mekele. According to this
finding pregnant women with mild dietary diversity were more likely anemic as compared their
countr part. (A.Abriha 2014, Taddese A 2016).
• This could be due to that pregnant women with low or mild dietary diversity have chance to get
diet with low iron content
Conclusion and Recommendations
 The over all prevalence of anemia was 22.3%.No severe case’s of anemia was detected.
 Even though the finding of this study is low compared to other study, anemia is moderate public health
problem(20-40%). In this study anemia was associated with occupation of the husband(merchant) , women
occupation, eating diversified food, nutritional status of pregnant women
 To alleviate the problem of anemia all responsible body have to play his role.
 All health professional specially who have direct contact with mother have to educate pregnant women on
feeding practice that can prevent anemia and some feeding practice that decrease nutritional value of iron
containing dietary items.
 To decrease effect of malnutrition; pregnant women should be counseled on dietary intake that can prevent
malnutrition. Werede health office and primary health care unit should educate pregnant women and family
member (husband) about dietary diversity.
 Husband of women should give great attention to care of women specially during pregnancy.

Werede administration and werede health office should educate pregnant women and family (husband) on
their jobs activities and the effect their jobs (activities) fatigue, shortness of breath, dizziness, vertigo (anemia)
sign and symptoms
Reference
• 1. World Health Organization, Micronutrient deficiency Prevention and control guidelines, Geneva,
Switzerland; 2015 ;( 11)8-7
• 2 Grewal A, Anemia and pregnancy anaesthtic implication, Indian journal of Anaesth, 2010, (54):380-386.
• 3 A.Abriha, M.EYesuf, M.M.Wassie, Prevalence &associated factor of anaemia among pregnant women of
mekelle town, BMC Research Notes, 2014, vol.7, article 888.
• 4.Mulugeta M ,ZelalemAet .al, Prevalence and determinant of maternal anemia during pregnancy in
GondarNorth West Ethiopia, Hinadwi, 2013, vol 10, article 108593.
• 5. P. Lacerte, M. Pradipasen, P. Temcharoen, N. Imamee, and T. Vorapongsathorn, Determinants of
adherence to iron/folate supplementation during pregnancy,Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2011, vol.
23, no. 3, pp. 315–323.
• 6. E. Ejeta, B. Alemnew, A. Fikadu, M. Fikadu, L. Tesfaye, and T. Birhanu,Prevalence of anaemia in
pregnant womens and associated risk factors in Western Ethiopia, Food Science and Quality Management,
2014, vol. 31.