Download Les sociétés françaises d`autoroutes et l`interopérabilité

Implementation of
Directive 2004/52
status at the end of 2005
European Commission - DG TREN
EFC DIRECTIVE

1. THE STATUS OF THE DIRECTIVE
• Adopted in March 2004 by the Council
and in April 2004 by the Parliament
• In force since end of May 2004
• Should be put in national legislation for
20 November 2005
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
COMITE TELEPEAGE

It is a Regulatory Committee
• First meeting December 2004
• Next meetings foreseen April /June 2005

The EFC Expert Group advises DG TREN
on the documents and resolutions
proposed for adoption by the Commission
with the assistance of the Regulatory
Committee
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
COMITE TELEPEAGE


Regulatory Committee limited to the
25 EU Member States
Expert Group : 25 MS + candidate
countries (HR – RO – BG – TR) +
EFTA countries (NO – CH – Iceland)
+ associations (ASECAP – IRU –
ERIC – IRF – ACEA)
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Definition process
Report
Project or
Expert Group
Proposals
Regulatory Committee
(vote)
yes
EUROPEAN
COMMISSION
Advices
EFC Expert
Group
Road
Platform
no
DEFINITION
COUNCIL OF
MINISTERS
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
WORK PROGRAM
UNTIL 2006
Work Program

1. technologies supporting the EFC
service and their evolution
• GNSS / CN
• CEN DSRC
• Telepass

In the future, after 2006 :
• UMTS
• Galileo vs GPS

Other technologies (infrared…)
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Work Program

WORKING GROUPS
• Call launched for CVs of experts
• Open until 30 June 2006
• CVs put in a data base where from people are
chosen to buid a task force
• Already around 120 CVs in the data base
• Task forces contracted by EC for limited
number of days and very detailed working
scope
• Report endorsed by DG TREN and then
submitted for comments to the EFC Expert
Group
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Working Groups
• 1. DSRC technologies led by Jesper Engdahl
(RAPP AG)

Report studied by EFC Expert Group : 8 June 2005
• 2. Classification of vehicles led by Ken Perrett

Report finalized 02 / 2005
• 3. enforcement of offenses Jean Mesqui (ASFA)


Report studied by EFC Expert Group : 06 / 2005
MS comments due for 30 November 2005
• 4. certification centers Fransisco Soriano –
(LISITT)

Report provided October 2005, discussed by EFC
expert Group : 7 December 2005
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Working Groups
• 5. GNSS/CN technologies for EFC led by
Wolfgang Beier (Toll Collect)

Report studied by EFC Expert Group 06 / 2005
• 6. integration of OBU in vehicles, Mike
Hollingsworth ACEA

Report provided July 2005 – EFC Expert Group 7
/12/05
• 7. the role of the financial institutions in the
system : to be defined
• 8. Verification of the Telepass Specification,
follow-up of EG 1 , led by Jesper Engdahl

Report provided 09 / 2005, discussed EFC Expert
Group March 2006
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Working Groups
• 9. Specifications for a pan-European satellite
EFC system : led by Ian Catling

Report expected end of 2005, discussed EFC expert
Group March 2006
• 10. Technologies and specification for
enforcement : led by Joao Pecegueiro (Via
Verde – PT)

Report expected end of 2005, discussed EFC Expert
Group March 2006
• 11. specifications for a pan-European EFc
application on microwaves led by Bernhard
Oerhy (RAPP AG)

Report expected end of 2005 / Jan 2006, discussed
EFC Expert Group March 2006
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
EC Decision on Technical
definitions

From the reports of the 10 Groups :
• First DG TREN proposal for a
Commission Decision discussed with
EFC Expert Group March / April 2006
• Takes only into account elements on
Technology
• Internal Consultation Process April /
May
• Submitted to the Regulatory Committee
: June 2006
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Work Program

RCI
• Project for demonstration under the frame of
the 6th RTD FP
• Launched in July 2005 for 36 months
• Led by ERTICO and involves most of motorway
and toll operators in Europe
• Demonstration of transactions by DSRC as well
as GNSS / CN with the same onboard unit
• Call for tenders to choose two electronic
integrators for the OBU : Jan / Feb 2006
• 25 expressions of interest already received
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
HMI interface
European application
(to be defined)
MISTER
CARDME specification
ISO 17575
CEN DSRC
interface
Telepass
Interface
GNSS
interface
GPRS
interface
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Market strategy

Some elements for the future :
• The price between the GNSS part and
the DSRC part is now very different in
range of magnitude (400 € versus 20 €)
• The Directive does not prevent
operators to offer to their clients OBUs
corresponding to their needs



CEN DSRC only
CEN DSRC + TELEPASS
GNSS + DSRC
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Market strategy
• Clients request that these should be used for
all onboard applications which require the
same technologies






Tolling
Freight and fleet management
Management of dangerous goods
Routing
…
Some trucks are already equipped with
fleet and freight management terminals
containing GPS and GPRS
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Market strategy
• Therefore, the OBU designed for EFC
should also be open to other
applications
• And OBUS used for Freight and Fleet
Management should be open to tolling
applications
• Integration of functions is the key to an
unexpensive EFC OBU
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Market strategy
• However, all OBUS used for EFC must be
certified for the needs of EFC operators,
including all security mechanisms
• Integration of functions will lead to
integration of the onboard unit in the
vehicle by manufacturers, when they
construct and deliver the truck or coach
• This paves the way to other ITS services
(emergency call, management of
dangerous goods…)
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
CESARE III





Projet between ASECAP (PT – AT - DK - ES – FR –
IT – NO – SLO - EL – HR – HU) and the
Stockholm group (UK – NL – DE – SV – FI – CH –
SLO)
Follow-up of CESARE I and II
Cesare II has provided important results for
cooperation between road concessionnaires
levying tolls
Results applied in PISTA inside ES and between
ES and FR
CESARE III aims to adapt CESARE II to the needs
of the Stockholm group organizations
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
CESARE III

Aims of the project :
• Service definition
• Procedural interoperability
• Memorandum of understanding between
operators
• Single contract with clients
• Service conditions
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
CESARE III

Structure of the project :
• WP 1and 2 : revise business model and
provide service definition
• WP 3 and 4 : organisational arrangements and
documents for contractual interoperability
between operators of all kinds
• WP 5 : procedural interoperability
• WP 6 : liaison with external bodies like the
Comité Télépéage
• Duration 18 months starting April 2005
• Contact : Claude Bidaud (ASF – France)


Tel : +33.1.72.71.90.20
[email protected]
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
CESARE III






End of the project : October 2006
Results of the project discussed EFC Expert
Group December 2006
Preparation of the Commission Decision related
to contractual and procedural issues in Jan 2007
Commission Decision discussed EFC Expert Group
Feb 2007
Internal EC process for adoption Feb / April 2007
Submitted to the Regulatory Committee May
2007
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Work Program

3. Pan-European Certification procedures and
label for equipment, including those for
enforcement of violations
• Onboard units (key issue)
• Enforcement tools providing the evidence of the offence
• Integration of OBU in the vehicles


Need a network of certification centers and
common procedures
How to do it ?
• project to launch by DG TREN under a call for tenders in
2006
• Specs prepared by Expert Group 4
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Work Program

4. Exception handling
• VERA 2 leads to :




new EC draft Directive
Because no MS has started to implement the Council
Decision of 8/5/03
eNFORCE network : deployment of a first version
with AT – ES – FR – NL under preparation (VERA 3)
Certification procedures for the equipment
• But VERA 2 might be more efficient for
criminal offences than for civil ones like EFC
• Therefore, MS should do their best to fight
fraud on their own territory
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports
Thanks for your attention
Commission Européenne
Direction Générale de l’Énergie et des Transports