Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
America’s Attitudes, Actions and Beliefs regarding Climate Change: Community Water Providers are Trusted Sources Presented by: Karen Raucher Stratus Consulting Inc. [email protected] Western Electric Coordinating Council SPSG Workshop – Energy-WaterClimate Change Risk Assessment October 14, 2014 Effective Climate Change Communication Strategies for Water Utility Stakeholders The Water Research Foundation Project Manager: Linda Reekie Conducted by Stratus Consulting Access the final report here: http://www.waterrf.org/Pages/Projects.aspx?PID=4381 Project Goals Help utilities overcome climate change communication barriers Acknowledgements The Project Team: Anthony Leiserowitz, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication Mark Millan, Data Instincts Rich Atwater, Southern California Water Committee Michael Dennis and Joseph Garrett, Knowledge Networks (the GfK Corp.) Steve Conrad, Simon Fraser University, Institute for Climate Solutions Joy Barrett, RCAP Numerous colleagues at Stratus Consulting Participating Utilities Organization American Water Austin Water Denver Water Inland Empire Utilities Agency Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department New York City Department of Environmental Protection City of Phoenix Water Services Department San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Southern Nevada Water Authority United Utilities Western Municipal Water District City of Wilmington Department of Public Works City/state/country Voorhees, NJ Austin, TX Denver, CO Chino, CA Los Angeles, CA Miami, FL New York, NY Phoenix, AZ San Francisco, CA Las Vegas, NV Great Sankey, Warrington, UK Riverside, CA Wilmington, DE The Project Process Research Why is climate change difficult to talk about What audiences really feel about climate change when you add the concept of community water Products Engagement tools Survey tools Communication tools Why is Climate Change Difficult to Talk about? It is a wicked problem: Complex scientific components No solution that is positive across values Why is Climate Change Difficult to Talk about (cont.)? We are neurologically wired to make safe decisions quickly Why is Climate Change Difficult to Talk about (cont.)? Trusted Sources How much do you trust your water utility to do the following things: Trusted Sources for Climate Change Information The National Survey Survey methodology Three types of questions Attitudes Beliefs Actions Three subject areas Community water Climate change [Yale Project on climate change communication (Leiserowitz)] Nexus of climate change and community water A large majority of Americans support their water provider planning for the future (10–40 years). When planning for the future, how much attention do you think your water utility should give to the following issues? Assuming the money is needed, and would be spent wisely and efficiently, would you be willing to pay extra each month to ensure that your community has access to abundant, safe water for the next 10–40 years? My water utility has a plan, has taken the necessary actions, and is adequately prepared for extreme weather. How large of a leadership role should your community water utility play in helping your community prepare for the impacts of climate change? Global Warming’s “Six Americas” Leiserowitz et al. (2011) Five Americas for “Community Water and Climate Change” Advocates Supporters Skeptical Supporters Closed Wallets Pessimists 20% 44% 13% 15% 8% Highest level of support for community water climate actions Lowest level of support for community water climate actions Pessimist (8%) 41% are willing to pay up to $3 more per month to ensure there is abundant, safe water in the future 31% do not think there is much a water provider can do to protect the local water supply from extreme weather Most likely to show up at a utility meeting Message Testing Water cycle Extreme events Separation Net Change in Support as a Response to Climate Change by Message Group 50 45 Percent change 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Water cycle: 19% Extreme weather events: 40% Separation: 43% Net Change in Support as a Response to Climate Change by Audience Segment and Message Test 70 60 50 Percent 40 Water cycle message 30 20 Extreme weather event message 10 Separation message 0 -10 -20 Advocates Supporters Skeptical Supporters Closed Wallets Pessimists Net Change in Willingness-to-pay from No to Yes (water message) 14 Percent change 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Advocates Supporters Skeptical Closed Wallets Pessimists Supporters Things to think about… Are water utility leaders interested in being climate change communication leaders? If so, how do we support them? Can utilities develop long-term communication strategies that change how their communities respond to climate change? We can use the survey to actually measure changes. How does this research apply to electric utilities? Thank You for Your Time! Access the final report here: http://www.waterrf.org/Pages/Projects.aspx?PID=4381 The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place. George Bernard Shaw