Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 1 Introduction Lectures 1 - 3. In this chapter we introduce the basic notions random experiment, sample space, events and probability of event. By a random experiment, we mean an experiment which has multiple outcomes and one don't know in advance which outcome is going to occur. We call this an experiment with `random' outcome. We assume that the set of all possible outcomes of the experiment is known. Definition 1.1. Sample space of a random experiment is the set of all possible outcomes of the random experiment. Example 1.0.1 Toss a coin and note down the face. This is a random experiment, since there are multiple outcomes and outcome is not known before the toss, in other words, outcome occur randomly. More over, the sample space is Example 1.0.2 Toss two coins and note down the number of heads obtained. Here sample space is . Example 1.0.3 Pick a point `at random' from the interval picking any point. Sample space is . `At random' means there is no bias in . Definition 1.2 ( Event ) Any subset of a sample space is said to be an event. Example 1.0.4 is an event corresponding to the sample space in Example 1.0.1. Definition 1.3 (mutually exclusive events) Two events are said to be mutually exclusive if . If and are mutually exclusive, then occurrence of Note that non occurrence of Example 1.0.5 The events But the events , implies non occurrence of need not imply occurrence of , , since and vice versa. need not be of the sample space in Example 1.0.1 are mutually exclusive. are not mutually exclusive. Now we introduce the concept of probability of events (in other words probability measure). Intuitively probability quantifies the chance of the occurrence of an event. We say that an event has occurred, if the outcome belongs to the event. In general it is not possible to assign probabilities to all events from the sample space. For the experiment given in Example 1.0.3, it is not possible to assign probabilities to all . So one need to restrict to a smaller class of subsets of the sample space. For the subsets of random experiment given in Example 1.0.3, it turns out that one can assign probability to each interval in as its length. Therefore, one can assign probability to any finite union of intervals in , by representating the finite union of intervals as a finite disjoint union of intervals. In fact one can assign probability to any countable union interval in by preserving the desirable property "probability of countable disjoint union is the sum of probabilities". Also note that if one can assign probability to an event, then one can assign probability to its compliment, since occurence of the event is same as the non-occurance of its compliemt. Thus one seek to define probability on those class of events which satisfies "closed under complimentation" and "closed under countable union". This leads to the following special family of events where one can assign probabilities. Definition 1.4 A family of subsets following. (i) of a nonempty set is said to be a -field if it satisfies the (ii) if , then (iii) if , then Example 1.0.6 Let Then i.e., -fields. Moreover, if is the smallest and Then Let is a Lemma 1.0.1 is a is the largest be a nonempty set and -field and is the smallest is called the is a be a nonempty set. Define are Example 1.0.7 . -field generated by Let -field of subsets of -field of subsets of , then . . Define -field containing the set . . be an index set and be a family of -fields. Then -field. Proof. Since for all , we have . Now, Similarly it follows that Hence is a -field. Example 1.0.8 is a Let . Then -field and is the smallest -field containing This can be seen as follows. From Lemma 1.0.1, clearly . If -field containing (ii) if , then -field containing is a , then -field. From the definition of . Hence, . Definition 1.5 A family (i) is a . We denote it by of subsets of a non empty set is said to be a field if , is the smallest (iii) if , then Example 1.0.9 Any . -field is a field. In particular, Example 1.0.10 Let Then are fields. . Define is a field but not a -field. Note that (i) and (ii) in the definition of field follows easily. To see (iii), for are finite so is (iii) follows. i.e., To see that and if either or , if both is finite, then is finite. Hence is a field. is not a -field, take Now Definition 1.6 (Probability measure) Let be a nonempty set and be a -field of subsets of . A map is said to be a probability measure if P satisfies (i) (ii) if are pairwise disjoint, then Definition 1.7 (Probability space). ; where The triplet , a nonempty set (sample space), ,a -field and , a probability measure; is called a probability space. . Define on as follows. Example 1.0.11 Let Then is a probability space. This probability space corresponds to the random experiment of tossing an unbiased coin and noting the face. Example 1.0.12 Let Then is a probability space. Solution. . Define on as follows. If (This holds since are pairwise disjoint. Then 's are disjoint) Therefore Therefore properties (i) , (ii) are satisfied. Hence Theorem 1.0.1 (Properties of probability measure) are in (1) . Then . (2) Finite sub-additivity: (3)Monotonicity: if , then (4)Boole's inequality (Countable sub-additivity): (5)Inclusion - exclusion formula: (6)Continuity property: (i) For (ii) For Proof. Since , is a probability measure. Let a probability space and This proves (1). Now Therefore since . This proves (3). We prove (5) by induction. For and (Here Hence we have and Combining the above, we have Assume that equality holds for Consider Therefore the result true for . Hence by induction property (5) follows. From property (5), we have Hence Thus we have (2). Now we prove (6)(i). Set Then are disjoint and (1.0.1) Also (1.0.2) Using (1.0.1), we get Now using the definition of convergence of series, one has (1.0.3) Hence from (1.0.3), we have Proof of (6)(ii) is as follows. Note that Now using (6)(i) we have i.e., Hence From property (2), it follows that i.e., Therefore (1.0.4) Set Then and are in . Also Hence (1.0.5) Here the second equality follows from the continuity property 6(i). Using (1.0.5), letting (1.0.4), we have in Recall that all the examples of probability spaces we had seen till now are with sample space finite or countable and the -field as the power set of the sample space. Now let us look at a random experiment with uncountable sample space and the -field as a proper subset of the power set. Consider the random experiment in Example 1.0.3, i.e, pick a point 'at random' from the interval . Since point is picked 'at random', the probability measure should satisfy the following. (1.0.6) The -field we are using to define P is is called the Borel -field of subsets of Our aim is to define , the . . for all elements of Clearly -field generated by all intervals in , preserving (1.0.6). Set . Let . then can be represented as where , Then where Therefore . , it follows from the definition of For Hence Define that . is a field. on as follows. (1.0.7) where 's are pair wise disjoint intervals of the form Extension of from to . follows from the extension theorem by Caratheodary. To understand the statement of the extension theorem, we need the following definition. Definition 1.8 (Probability measure on a field) Let be a nonempty set and be a field. Then is said to be a probability measure on if (i) (ii) if Example 1.0.13 be such that The set function Theorem 1.0.2 (Extension Theorem) extension to are pairwise disjoint and , then given by (1.0.7) is a probability measure on the field A probability measure defined on a field has a unique . Using Theorem 1.0.2, one can extend defined by (1.0.7) to see Exercise 1.6 , there exists a unique probability measure . Since on preserving (1.0.6). .