Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Instructions: 1. Type your name in the top row of the box. 2. Select “Instruction Mode” possibilities mid-way down the box. Remember—these apply to any running of the course, taught by anyone any time. 3. Type in the areas below the box that are NOT yellow—below the header box, following Roman numerals II-IX. Remember—these apply to any running of the course, taught by anyone any time (ECOs are supposed to have a shelf life of 5 years). Prepared By (your name) Subject Area Catalogue # Course Title: (Enter Course Title: up to 100 Characters Maximum) Units C/S # Component Instruction Mode (make bold all that apply) Grading Basis Repeat Basis Cross-listed course (w/another dept.) Dual-listed course (grad/u.g.) Major or service course (make bold all that apply) URP 5370 Environmental Policy 3 C5 Seminar Fully Asynchronous Hybrid with Synchronous Component Component Face to Face Fully Synchronous Graded only May be taken only once Major course Asynchronous Local Hybrid with Asynchronous Web Assisted Synchronous Local Service course I. Catalog Description URP 5370 Environmental Policy (3) Theories, ethics and methods of environmental planning in an intergovernmental context. Analysis of environmental equity in facility siting and urban design. Review of environmental elements for general plans, risk analysis, and habitat conservation planning. II. Required Background or Experience Graduate standing. III. Expected Outcomes By successfully completing the course students will be able to: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of the major environmental challenges facing modern societies. 2. Demonstrate an understanding of a framework for environmental planning including environmental ethics, the interplay of religion and environmental policy, the emerging concepts of well being, and the meaning of sustainability. 3. Demonstrate a basic understanding of local and state climate initiatives, federal environmental laws, and global environmental treaties. 4. Apply the framework developed in the first three outcomes to the development of environmental elements and sustainability planning. IV. Texts and Readings Kraft, Michael and Norman Vig. (2012) Environmental Policy. Washington D.C.: Sage. Layzer, Judith. (2012) The Environmental Case. Washington D.C.: Sage. Scientists’ Consensus Group. (2013) Maintaining Humanity’s Life Support Systems in the 21st. Century. City of Santa Monica. (2014). A City of Well Being. Editors. (2008) Environmental Ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Additional online readings will be assigned. V. Minimum Student Materials [boiler plate language below may be of use, but feel free to delete and substitute instructional language of your own choosing.] Course Textbooks, access to the internet VI. Minimum College Facilities [boiler plate language below may be of use, but feel free to delete and substitute instructional language of your own choosing.] Classroom, Computer Labs, Library, Course management software (e.g. Blackboard) VII. Course Outline 1. Summary of Global Environmental Challenges Population Growth Toxic Contamination Loss of Biodiversity Climate Change Ecosystem Disruption 2. Philosophical Framework for Environmental Planning Environmental Ethics Religion and the Environment Well Being Environmental Justice Concepts of Sustainability 3. Environmental Planning at Different Levels Local and State Climate Initiatives Federal Environmental Laws Major Global Environmental Treaties 4. Developing Environmental Elements and Regional Habitat Conservation Planning General Plan in California Endangered Species Act Habitat Conservation Planning VIII. Instructional Methods [boiler plate language below may be of use, but feel free to delete and substitute instructional language of your own choosing.] A variety of instructional methods will be used to help students achieve expected course outcomes. They include the following: 1. Lecture 2. Discussion of assigned reading 3. Small group activities 4. In class and online presentations 5. Student feedback on in class and online presentations There may be a course management component (e.g. Blackboard) to this course. If so, students will be expected to check the course management site regularly, contribute to online discussions, and get course information and submit course work through the site. IX. Evaluation of Outcomes [Describe the methods to be used to evaluate students’ learning, i.e. written exams, term papers, projects, participation, quizzes, attendance, etc.] Align each with one or more learning outcomes. Here are some examples (please try to use these abbreviations. IC and OL stands for in class or on-line): WE Written exam (# and IC or OL) OE Oral exam (# and IC) PE Problem solving exam (# and IC or OL) QU Quiz ( # and IC or OL) DIS Discussion (# and IC or OL) ACT Activities (# and IC or OL) LAB Laboratory exercises (# and IC or OL) CP Class participation (IC or OL) DE Design exercises (#) DP Design projects (#) CR Client-based reports (#) SP Short papers or analyses (#) TP Term papers Learning outcome 1) Understanding of environmental challenges 2) Understanding of framework for environmental planning 3) Understanding of environmental policies at different levels 4) Application of understanding to environmental plans Assessment tools Individual SP QU SP QU DIS SP QU DIS SP QU DIS Group etc (add as needed) [Separately, describe the meaningful writing assignments to be included.] The grade for the course will be based on five short papers covering demonstration of knowledge and analysis at different stages of the courses (75%) and participation, discussion, and in class response papers (25%). The papers will require the integration and analysis of course readings and discussions. Discuss how these methods may be used to address the course and program outcomes, as appropriate. Include a matrix to align the evaluation methods to the outcomes. Review of course syllabi, review of course products by faculty and accreditation teams, and consideration of comments derived from focus groups with class cohorts.