* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Non-Dimensional System for Analysis Equilibrium Point
Survey
Document related concepts
Perturbation theory wikipedia , lookup
Inverse problem wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical physics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
History of numerical weather prediction wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical economics wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup
Plateau principle wikipedia , lookup
Computational electromagnetics wikipedia , lookup
Routhian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 8, 2014, no. 2, 91 - 98 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2014.310602 Non-Dimensional System for Analysis Equilibrium Point Mathematical Model of Tumor Growth Subiyanto1, 2, Mustafa Mamat1, 3, Mohammad Fadhli Ahmad2 and 4Noor Maizura Mohamad Noor 1 Fellow Research, Department of Mathematics 4 Department of Computer Science 2 Department of Maritime Technology Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia 3 Faculty of Informatics and Computing Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu, Malaysia Copyright © 2014 Subiyanto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract. In this paper we presented analysis equilibrium point of mathematical model tumor growth use non-dimensional technique. This technique is useful to simply equation that complicated as a mathematical model that present in this paper. This mathematical model describes the effect of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) on the dynamics of tumor cells. The steps of this technique are presented. With this technique we can be to determine more accurately the equilibria of our system which form nonlinear dynamics of system ordinary differential equation that coupled. Mathematical Subject Classification: 35F25, 37N25, 92C50 Keywords: equilibrium point, interleukin, non-dimensional, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor growth 1. Introduction There are many models of mathematical tumor growth that formulated in couple of system ordinary differential equations [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 11]. All of 92 Subiyanto et al. these equations in the form nonlinear dynamics, so that to solve these equations necessary numerical method. In this paper we present our mathematical model as previous work [5, 9 and 10]. This model is also described in the form nonlinear dynamics of system ordinary differential equation that coupled. Moreover, many variable and units that use in this equation. Therefore, we need specific technique to solve equations like this. One of the techniques to partial or full removal of unit from an equation is non-dimensional. Non-dimensional is substitution of suitable variables for partial or full removal of the unit from an equation in involving physical quantities. 2. Mathematical Model The mathematical model is a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) whose state variables are populations of tumor cells based on previous work [9] as follows: T dT (1) aT 1 cNT DT b dt dN T2 eC fN g N pNT (2) dt h T 2 dL D 2T 2 (3) mL j L qLT r1 N r2 C T uNL2 dt k D 2T 2 dC C (4) dt (L / T )l (5) Dd s (L / T )l Table 1: Variables and their associated units Variable t T N L C D Units day cell cell cell cell day-1 Description Time Population tumor cells Population NK cells Population CD8+T cells Population circulating lymphocyte cells Interaction tumor and CD8+T cells 3. Result and Discussion 3.1. Non-dimensional system Based on the variables present in Table 1 to non-dimensionalized variable t, we would necessary to multiply it with some combination of constants that has units Mathematical model of tumor growth of 93 . From equations (1)–(5) we obtain that the following combinations have units of : a, cb, d, e, f, g, etc Any one of these would be absolutely correct choices. The main reason we select one over the other is because we hope to be able to factor out similar term in the end. For this problem, we decide to use: ~ T ~ N ~ L ~ C ~ D ~ t a t and T , N , L ,C , D T0 N0 L0 C0 D0 as the non-dimensional variables. Substitution these variables in the equation (1)-(5) we obtained: ~ ~ dT ~ T0T c ~~ D ~ ~ (6) T 1 N 0 NT 0 DT ~ dt b a a ~2 ~ dN e C 0 ~ f ~ g T0 T ~ pT ~ ~ C N N 0 NT (7) ~ 2 ~ dt a N0 a a h T T a 0 ~2 ~2 ~ dL m ~ j D0 D T0T ~ ~ ~ qT ~ ~ T ~ L 0 L T 0 r1 N 0 N r2 C0 C T 2 ~ L 2 2 ~ ~ dt a ak D D TT a aL0 ~ ~ N L 0 0 uL0 N 0 (8) a ~ dC ~ (9) C ~ dt aC0 a ~ l d L0 L ~ ~ D0 T0T (10) D ~ l L0 L s ~ T0T Based on the equation (6)-(10), we obtained a new set of non-dimensional ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ variables of T , N , L , C , and D as follow: ~ T ~ L ~ Ca ~ Na 2 ~ D , N , D T , L , C b b a e 2 Substitute these variables in the equation (6)-(10) we obtained: ~ dT ~ ~ ce ~ ~ ~ ~ T 1 T 3 NT DT ~ dt a ~ ~ dN ~ f ~ g T 2 ~ pb ~ ~ C N N NT ~ dt a a h ~2 a T b2 (11) (12) 94 Subiyanto et al. ~ dL m~ j L ~ dt a a ~ ~ D 2T 2 ~ qb ~ ~ r1e ~ r2 ~ ~ ube ~ ~2 L L T 3 N 2 C T 3 NL k ~2 ~2 a a a a D T 2 2 a b (13) ~ dC ~ (14) 1 C ~ dt a ~ l dL ~ a T ~ (15) D ~ l L s ~ T To determine a new set of non-dimensional constants from the equation (11)-(15) as follows: ce d f g h j k m c 3 , d , f , g , h 2 , j , k 2 2 , m , a a a a a a b a b r e r pb qb ub e , q , r1 1 3 , r2 2 2 , u 3 , p a a a a a a Substitute these constants in equation (11)-(15) we obtained simple system equations: ~ dT ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ (16) T 1 T c NT DT ~ dt ~ ~ dN ~ T2 ~ ~ ~~ C f N g ~ 2 N p NT (17) ~ dt h T ~ ~ ~ dL D 2T 2 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m L j L q L T r N r C T u NL2 (18) ~ ~ 1 2 ~ 2 2 dt k D T ~ dC ~ (19) 1 C ~ dt ~ l L d ~ ~ T D (20) ~ l L s ~ T By dropping the embellishment and star for notational clarity in equations (16)(20), the non-dimensionalized system is given by: dT T 1 T cNT DT (21) dt dN T2 (22) C fN g N pNT dt h T 2 dL D 2T 2 (23) mL j L qLT r1 N r2 C T uNL2 2 2 dt kD T Mathematical model of tumor growth 95 dC 1 C (24) dt l L d T (25) D l L s T These system equations have a similar term with initial equations (1)-(5), yet these system equations have one less constants or more simple to analysis. 3.2. Determination of equilibria In order to examine the behavior of these cell populations according to our model, we note first that equation (24) decouples from equations (21) through (23), so that we reduce the system down to three equations by allowing the number of circulating lymphocytes in the body remain to constant at its equilibrium: 1 (26) C Since the differential equation for circulating lymphocytes is independent of the other cell populations, this is its only stable state. Thus, this leaves system equations (21) through (23), which we set simultaneously equal to zero to obtain their equilibria. By setting the derivatives in each of these equations to zeros, the equilibrium point T, N and L can be found as follows: dT 0 0 T 1 T cNT DT dt T 1 cN D 1 T=0 or dN 0 dt N 0 C fN g C h T2 fh phT f g T 2 T 3 (27) 2 T N pNT h T2 (28) dL D 2T 2 0 0 mL j L qLT r1 N r2 C T uNL2 2 2 dt kD T 2 b b 4ac L (29) 2a where: D 2T 2 a uN , b m j qT and c r1 N r2 C T 2 2 kD T Equation (27) has one zero at the “tumor-free” equilibrium at T 0 , and possibly several non-zero tumor equilibria. Let the change in tumor population be set to 1 zero by forcing T = 0. Then substitute T = 0 and C to equation (28) and (29). 96 Subiyanto et al. C 1 m or N and (uN ) L2 mL 0 or L2 uN f f We are only interested in equilibria that real and positive, since these problems are a biological system. Then tumor free equilibrium exists when: TE , N E , LE , C E 0, 1 ,0, 1 f In the case where T 0 , the determined are still determine by finding the simultaneous of solutions (27) through (29), but in this case value must be determine numerically. (a) (b) N 200 0.07 180 0.06 160 0.05 140 120 L1 L2 0.04 0.03 100 80 60 0.02 40 0.01 20 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 T 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 T 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Figure 1. Plot variable T and variable L. (a) Equation (29). (b) Equation (31) 0.1 L1 L2 0.08 0.06 T: 0.5641 L: 0.06418 0.04 L 0.02 T: 0.9875 L: 0.02096 0 -0.02 -0.04 -0.06 -0.08 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 T 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Figure 2. Intersection equations (29) and (31) in non-dimensional system. Stage to found these solutions as follows: Solving for N yields in equation (28) for determine solution T 0 in equation (27) (30) D 1 cN T Using this expression in equation (25) gives an expression for L: Mathematical model of tumor growth 97 1 sDT l l L2 (31) d D Finally, Equilibrium points of the system (21) through (25) are found by intersecting equations (29) and (31). These solutions are shown in Figure 1. From Figure 2 obtained equilibrium points for TE and L E as follows: TE , LE 0.5641, 0.06418 TE , LE 0.9875, 0.02096 and These values substitutes in equations (27) and (28) found equilibrium points in the case T 0 as follows: TE , N E , LE , C E 0.5641, 0.0082, 0.06418, 35.9167 and TE , N E , LE , CE 0.9875, 0.0047, 0.02096, 35.9167 . 4. Conclusion There are times when numerically integrating a given equation might take longer due to the sizes of some of the constants presented in [5]. This can be simplified significantly by reducing what seems like a completely different system to the system is essentially governed by the same rules of motion. While nondimensional might seem like a lot of work for very little gain, it is actually a very useful tool. Likewise, if we can find a constant with units of , then the numerical equation can be solved in much less time, and is also less prone to instability. In this research we find the constant of time with units of is ~ T ~ N ~ L ~ C ~ t a t and constant of population cells is T , N , L , C , T0 N0 L0 C0 ~ D that simplify our system ordinary differential equation dimensional to D D0 system ordinary differential equation non-dimensional. This system ordinary differential equation non-dimensional can be used for more accurate determines the equilibria of our system which form nonlinear dynamics of system ordinary differential equation that coupled. We obtained three equilibrium points in this research that only found two in the previous work [5]. For tumor free equilibrium 1 1 in case T=0 we obtained one equilibrium point is TE , N E , LE , C E 0, ,0, . f Then for tumor high equilibrium in case T 0 we obtained two equilibrium point as picture in Figure 2. Acknowledgment. We would like to thank the financial support from Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FGRS) Vot. 59256. 98 Subiyanto et al. References [1] N. Bellomo,and L. Preziosi, Modelling and mathematical problems related to tumor evolution and its interaction with the immune system, Math. Comput. Model, 32 (2000), 413-452. [2] N. Bellomo, A. Bellouquid and M. Delitala, Mathematical topics on the modelling of multicellular systems in competition between tumor and immune cells, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. S., 14 (2004), 1683-1733. [3] L. G. de Pillis and A. E. Radunskaya, A mathematical tumor model with immune resistance and drug therapy: an optimal control approach, J. Theor. Med., 3(2001), 79-100. [4] L. G. de Pillis, W. Gu and A. E. Radunskaya, Mixed immunotherapy and chemotherapy of tumor: modeling, application and biological interpretations, J. Theor. Biol., 238 (2006), 841-862. [5] A. Kartono and Subiyanto, Mathematical Model of The Effect of Boosting Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Immunotherapy, Pakistan Journal of Biology Sciences, 16(20) (2013), 1095-1103. [6] D. Kirschner and J. C. Panetta, Modeling immunotherapy of the tumorimmune interaction, J. Math. Biol., 37(3) (1998), 235-252. [7] V. Kuznetsov and I. Makalkin, Bifurcation-analysis of mathematical model of interactions between cytotoxic lymphocytes and tumor cells effect of immunological amplification of tumor growth and its connection with other phenomena of oncoimmunology, Biofizika, 37(6) (1992), 1063-1070. [8] V. Kuznetsov, I. Makalkin, M. Taylor and A. Perelson, Onlinear dynamics of immunogenic tumors: parameter estimation and global bifurcation analysis, Bull. Math. Biol., 56(2) (1994), 295-321. [9] M. Mamat, Subiyanto and A. Kartono, Mathematical Model of Tumor Therapy Using Biochemotherapy, Journal of Applied Science Research, 8(1) (2012), 357-370. [10] M. Mamat, Subiyanto and A. Kartono, Mathematical Model of Cancer Treatment Using Immunotherapy, Chemotherapy and Biochemotherapy, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 7(5) (2013), 247-261. [11] E. Rosenbaum and I. Rosenbaum, Everyone’s Guide to Cancer Supportive Care: A Comprehensive Handbook for Patients and Their Families, Andrews McMeel Publishing, 2005. Received: October 21, 2013