* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download SPECT/CT Imaging- Physics and g g y Instrumentation Issues
Survey
Document related concepts
Radiation therapy wikipedia , lookup
Neutron capture therapy of cancer wikipedia , lookup
Radiographer wikipedia , lookup
Industrial radiography wikipedia , lookup
Backscatter X-ray wikipedia , lookup
Center for Radiological Research wikipedia , lookup
Radiation burn wikipedia , lookup
Radiosurgery wikipedia , lookup
Positron emission tomography wikipedia , lookup
Medical imaging wikipedia , lookup
Fluoroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Image-guided radiation therapy wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
SPECT/CT Imagingg g Physics y and Instrumentation Issues Michael King, Ph.D. Professor of Radiology University of Massachusetts Medical School Disclosure: Di l D Dr. Ki King h has research h grants t ffrom NIH and Philips Medical Systems. Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Outline 0f Talk 1. Introduction – Multi-Modality y Imaging g g 2. Components of SPECT/CT’s 3. Reasons for Combining a CT with a y SPECT System 4. Radiation Dose 5. References Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Introduction – Multi-Modalityy Imaging g g • Multi-modality Imaging allows for the synthesis of information (anatomy and function). function) y is image g registration g • Keyy to synthesis • Tremendous amount of outstanding studies on i image registration i i b but: - What if patient is on different table table, positioned differently, or can’t see fiducials? - What if the other modality images do not exist? Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Introduction – Multi-Modalityy Imaging g g • SPECT/CT – Bruce Hasegawa and team at UCSF Early 1990’s A prototype CT/SPECT system was configured at the UCSF Physics Research Laboratory within the Department of Radiology. It combined a GE 600 XR/T SPECT system with a GE 9800 Quick CT scanner for correlated anatomical and functional imaging. (http://www.radiology.ucsf.edu/physics/dualmodality) • Why has combination of CT with SPECT not replaced standalone SPECT system as PET/CT has for PET? - SPECT systems cost less than state-of-art CT - AC standard in PET and CT faster than radionuclide transmission - A lot of general nuclear medicine is performed with planar as opposed to SPECT imaging Components p of SPECT/CT- SPECT • Radionuclide(s) which emits one or more discrete energy photons. • Collimators – match radionuclide – need to be changed. • Camera Heads – Keep close while circling patient for best imaging. • Variable angle bet between een camera heads. • Speed of rotation is limited for CT if detector and tube are on same gantry as camera heads. Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Components p of SPECT/CT- CT Bushberg, B hb et. t al.l The Th E Essential ti l Ph Physics i off M Medical di l Imaging, 2nd Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002 • • • • Tube from Siemens CT System Electrons flow from cathode to anode kV = max keV kVp k V mA (mCoul/sec) Time = sec Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Components of SPECT/CT- CT Bushberg, et. al. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002 • X-ray tube emits polychromatic beam of Bremsstrahlung x-rays, plus small number of discrete characteristic x-rays • Lower energy x-rays decreased by filtration (inherent added (inherent, added, and patient) Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Components of SPECT/CT- CT Kalender WA, Computed Tomography, Publicis MCD Verlag, Munich, 2000 • First Fi t Generation G ti – translate t l t / rotate t t • I0 = intensity no patient present • I = intensity with patient Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Components of SPECT/CT- CT Kalender WA, Computed Tomography, Publicis MCD Verlag, Munich, 2000 • Fan-beam with detector and tube rotating together. • Spiral / Helical – Slip-Ring - axial interpolation • Multi-Detector Array – Isotropic voxel size –> R di ti D Radiation Dose Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Components of SPECT/CT- Choices • SPECT and d CT on same or abutted b tt d gantries? ti ? - Diagnostic quality – use of contrast - Cardiac and / or general - Respiratory or EKG gating - Speed of acquisition (either is sequential) - Room size, control room, shielding - Cost • Table – how supported so that can maintain registration between SPECT and CT imaging with patient on table? • Need both CT and Nuclear Technologist Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Reasons for Combining – Attenuation Map for AC • Advantages Over Transmission Imaging - Less Noise - Better spatial resolution - No cross-talk - No radioactive source to replace - Acquisition Time • Concerns - Sequential O’Connor MK, et al. 9:361-376, 2002 - Polychromatic beam to discrete photon JNC energies - Contrast - Respiratory and Body Motion - Radiation dose Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Reasons for Combining – Attenuation Map for AC Mismatch causes problem in the lateral and anterior walls of cardiac studies. They saw up to a 30% difference. Le Meunier L, JNC 13: 821-830, 2006. Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Reasons for Combining – Anatomy to Correlate with Function • Advantages - Functional Images do not provide detailed anatomy - Numerous articles point out advantages for using combination in terms of diagnosis, staging, and followup of patients. - See for example Oct 2006 and Jan 2007 issues of Seminars in Nuclear N clear Medicine dedicated to SPECT/CT • Concerns - Need for contrast? - High radiation dose of extra diagnostic CT g low dose CT with existing g diagnostic g CT - Register - Respiratory and body motion Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Reasons for Combining – Anatomy to C Correlate l t with ith F Function ti 8 year old, pain left hip, MRI and x-ray no clear abnormality, referred bone scan, AVN Provided by Dr Stephen Scharf, Lenox Hill Hospital, NY Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Reasons for Combining – Use Anatomy to Define ROI’s and PVE Correction • Advantages - ROI used for quantification of activity - Absolute blood flow in heart (3-vessel disease, coronary artery flow reserve capacity capacity, and longitudinal studies) - Quantification of radiation dose for therapy - Edges g are many y times easier to define in CT studies - Template for correction of “partial volume effect” • Concerns - Need for contrast to define structure - Anatomy / function mismatch - Respiratory R i t and db body d motion ti Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Reasons for Combining – Use Anatomy to Define ROI’s ROI s and PVE Correction Template p p projection-reconstruction j method of UCSF applied pp to p porcine model Assign 1.0 to voxels in CT derived Template, project, and reconstruct mimicking SPECT Divide reconstructed template voxel by voxel into voxels in SPECT slices within original template and sum – (within 10-15%). Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Da Silva et al, J Nuc Med 42: 772-779, 2001 Radiation Dose – Cause for Concern % of Total Collective Effective Dose US Population in 2006 From All Sources Radon and Thoron (37%) Computed Tomography (24%) Nuclear Medicine (12%) Rest (27%) Adapted From NCRP Report No 160 - 2009 Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Radiation Dose – Example Effective Doses (mSv) • • • • • • Diagnostic CT of abdomen 13.71 CT used for AC (Hawkeye) 0.72 Radionuclide transmission imaging <0.023 Tc-99m MIBI Cardiac SPECT Study 6.41 Tl-201 Cardiac SPECT Study 10.01 Risk Cancer Death (LNT Model) 0.000054 1 M. 1. M G. G Stabin. Stabin JNM 49:1555-1563 49:1555-1563, 2008 2. L. J. Sawyer, et al. Nuc Med Comm 29:144-9, 2008 3. K. Van Laere, et al. JNM 41:2051-2062, 2000 4. E. J. Hall + A. J. Giaccia Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 2006 Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author Radiation Dose – Ways y to Reduse Dose • Filter beam to “harden” it. • Reduce mA when ever possible – automatic exposure control • Use low-dose CT with SPECT and register using this CT to existing diagnostic CT when available • Use iterative reconstruction to reduce noise in slices Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author References • JT Bushberg, et al. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging Lippincott Williams & Williams2nd Ed Imaging. Ed, 2002 • WA Kalender. Computed Tomography. Wiley 2nd Ed, 2006 •HZ Zaidi, idi B H Hasegawa. JNM 44 44:291-315, 291 315 2003 • MK O’Connor, BJ Kemp. Sem NM 36:258-266, 2006 • JA Patton, TG Turkington. JNMT 36:1-10, 2008 • AK Buck, et al. JNM 49:1305-1319, 2008. • DJ Brenner, EJ Hall. NJM 357:2277-84, 2007 Slides not to be reproduced without permission of author