Download Presentation Slides - Columbia Coast Blueprint

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Hotspot Ecosystem Research and Man's Impact On European Seas wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Saskatchewan wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Lower Columbia River and Coastal Landscape Conservation Design
Today’s Presenters:
John Mankowski, North Pacific LCC
Tom Miewald, US Fish and Wildlife Service
and NPLCC
Meghan Kearney, North Pacific LCC
Lisa DeBruyckere and Funding
Committee members
Facilitator: Lisa DeBruyckere, Creative Resource Strategies, LLC

Welcome (L. DeBruyckere)

Introduction (J. Mankowski)

MeetingSphere - https://us01.meetingsphere.com/trial45926164/coreteam5-4 (M. Kearney)

Project timeline and products (T. Miewald)

Workshops afield (T. Miewald)

Case studies – making the outputs of the LCD real (T. Miewald)

Funding Committee – status and updates (L. DeBruyckere, Funding Committee members)

Concept for a summit (T. Miewald, L. DeBruyckere)
AGENDA
Phase 2 - Includes Adaptive Learning
Phase 1
Start-Up
Winter-Spring
2016
Convening
Assess Current &
Future Conditions
Spatial
Priorities
Strategies
Late Fall
2018
Late Fall
2017
Spring
2017
Fundamental
Objectives
Collaboration
Network Analysis
Synthesis
Assessment of Targets:
Indicators & Threats
Symposia?
Refine Indicators and Threats
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping
Priorities
Refined Prioritization &
Connectivity Analysis
Inventory and
Mapping of Strategies
Strategy Design and
Prioritization
V 1.0 Product:
V 2.0 Product:
Synthesis of existing
spatial priorities,
coupled with social
network map and draft
viability assessment to
inform strategies
Refined viability/threats
assessment and new
connectivity analyses while
identifying strategies and
potential collective action
Phase 1
Start-Up
Winter-Spring
2016
Convening
Assess Current &
Future Conditions
Spatial
Priorities
Strategies
Phase 1
Start-Up
Winter-Spring
2016
Convening
Assess Current &
Future Conditions
Spatial
Priorities
Strategies
Spring
2017
Fundamental
Objectives
Synthesis
Phase 1
Start-Up
Winter-Spring
2016
Convening
Assess Current &
Future Conditions
Spatial
Priorities
Strategies
Spring
2017
Fundamental
Objectives
Synthesis
30
25
20
15
Very important
Important
Somewhat important
Important for version 2.0
10
5
0
Q1 Prioritization Q1 Priority core Q1 Effects of Q1 Assessment Q1 Connectivity Q1 Planning
Q1 Impacts to
of strategies areas for species climate change
of past and
zones for wildlife
across
habitats and
and/or habitats
on priority
present condition
ecosystem types species from
habitats and
population
species
increase and
development
Q1 Ecosystem
Q1 Connect
services in
existing small
combination with
projects &
species/habitat protected areas
conservation
30
25
20
15
Very important
Important
Future..
Somewhat important
Important for version 2.0
10
5
0
Q1 Prioritization Q1 Priority core Q1 Effects of Q1 Assessment Q1 Connectivity Q1 Planning
Q1 Impacts to
of strategies areas for species climate change
of past and
zones for wildlife
across
habitats and
and/or habitats
on priority
present condition
ecosystem types species from
habitats and
population
species
increase and
development
Q1 Ecosystem
Q1 Connect
services in
existing small
combination with
projects &
species/habitat protected areas
conservation
30
25
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping Priorities
20
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping Priorities
15
Very important
Important
Somewhat important
Important for version 2.0
10
5
0
Q1 Prioritization of strategies
Q1 Priority core areas for
species and/or habitats
Q1 Effects of climate change Q1 Assessment of past and
on priority habitats and species
present condition
Q1 Connectivity zones for
wildlife
30
25
20
Assessment of Targets:
Indicators & Threats
Very important
15
Important
Somewhat important
Important for version 2.0
10
5
0
Q1 Prioritization of strategies
Q1 Priority core areas for
species and/or habitats
Q1 Effects of climate change Q1 Assessment of past and
on priority habitats and species
present condition
Q1 Connectivity zones for
wildlife
30
25
20
Very important
15
Important
Somewhat important
Important for version 2.0
10
5
0
Q1 Prioritization of strategies
Q1 Priority core areas for
species and/or habitats
Q1 Effects of climate change Q1 Assessment of past and
on priority habitats and species
present condition
Q1 Connectivity zones for
wildlife
Phase 1
Start-Up
Winter-Spring
2016
Convening
Assess Current &
Future Conditions
Spatial
Priorities
Strategies
Spring
2017
Fundamental
Objectives
Synthesis
Phase 2 - Includes Adaptive Learning
Phase 1
Start-Up
Winter-Spring
2016
Convening
Assess Current &
Future Conditions
Spatial
Priorities
Strategies
Late Fall
2017
Spring
2017
Fundamental
Objectives
Collaboration
Network Analysis
Synthesis
Assessment of Targets:
Indicators & Threats
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping
Priorities
Inventory and
Mapping of Strategies
V 1.0 Product:
Synthesis of existing
spatial priorities,
coupled with social
network map and draft
viability assessment to
inform strategies
Late Fall
2018
https://tinyurl.com/lwv3jps
Social network /Collaboration analysis
POLL
Assessment of Targets: Indicators & Threats
Targets
Key Attributes
Indicators
State of the PNW
Coast Ecoregion
Strategies
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping Priorities
Phase 2 - Includes Adaptive Learning
Phase 1
Start-Up
Winter-Spring
2016
Convening
Assess Current &
Future Conditions
Spatial
Priorities
Strategies
Late Fall
2017
Spring
2017
Fundamental
Objectives
Collaboration
Network Analysis
Synthesis
Assessment of Targets:
Indicators & Threats
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping
Priorities
Inventory and
Mapping of Strategies
V 1.0 Product:
Synthesis of existing
spatial priorities,
coupled with social
network map and draft
viability assessment to
inform strategies
Late Fall
2018
Phase 2 - Includes Adaptive Learning
Phase 1
Start-Up
Winter-Spring
2016
Convening
Assess Current &
Future Conditions
Spatial
Priorities
Strategies
Late Fall
2018
Late Fall
2017
Spring
2017
Fundamental
Objectives
Collaboration
Network Analysis
Synthesis
Assessment of Targets:
Indicators & Threats
Symposia?
Refine Indicators and Threats
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping
Priorities
Refined Prioritization &
Connectivity Analysis
Inventory and
Mapping of Strategies
Strategy Design and
Prioritization
V 1.0 Product:
V 2.0 Product:
Synthesis of existing
spatial priorities,
coupled with social
network map and draft
viability assessment to
inform strategies
Refined viability/threats
assessment and new
connectivity analyses while
identifying strategies and
potential collective action
30
25
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping Priorities
20
Assessment of Targets:
Indicators & Threats
Spatial Synthesis/
Overlapping Priorities
15
Very important
Important
Somewhat important
Important for version 2.0
10
5
0
Q1 Prioritization of strategies
Q1 Priority core areas for
species and/or habitats
Q1 Effects of climate change Q1 Assessment of past and
on priority habitats and species
present condition
Q1 Connectivity zones for
wildlife
What would be useful processes and/or
products for “prioritizing strategies”?
•Prioritization of strategies (what to do where): restoration,
mitigation, protection, working landscapes, and “climate-smart”
strategies
• Synthesis of existing actions, efforts, strategies across the region?
• Mapping of where restoration v protection v climate smart
strategies are priorities?
• Developing “theories of change” or events chains?
Strategy Chains
FWS
Strategy
F.S.
NPLCC
Strategy
Strategy
Intermediate Outcome
Intermediate Outcome
Strategy
Strategy
TNC
WDFW
ODFW
Intermediate Outcome
Outcome:
Connected
Landscapes
What would be useful processes and/or
products for “prioritizing strategies”?
•Prioritization of strategies (what to do where): restoration,
mitigation, protection, working landscapes, and “climate-smart”
strategies
• Synthesis of existing actions, efforts, strategies across the region?
• Mapping of where restoration v protection v climate smart
strategies are priorities?
• Developing “theories of change” or events chains?
Workshops Afield
• Informational: what we’re doing
• Feedback: what would help
• Input
Case Studies
• Why?
• Criteria:
•“sub-landscape” or whole area
•direct mgt application,
•multi-party interest,
•across ownership boundaries,
•ecosystem-based,
•regional issue ( for example, connectivity)
•Threat (sea level rise, development, etc)
•Conservation & human use


Funding received to date:

NPLCC
$140,000

US Fish and Wildlife Service/NPLCC
$200,000
Next grant proposal

OWEB – June 2017


$150,000 (Focused Investment Partnership Grant)
Deliverables:

A spatially explicit database that represents the condition of targets across the region.

An integrated condition index for our conservation targets.

An assessment of critical data gaps and data problems that limit the ability to assess condition.

An assessment of human well-being targets and work plan and proposal for a robust assessment.

A prioritization of data gaps and how to fund.

A synthesis of future climate threats for all conservation targets.

A synthesis of future non-climatic threats for all conservation targets.

A process to manage data and associated metadata.

Produce a spatial database of previously identified priority conservation areas.

Complete a spatial prioritization of core areas, along with methodology and metadata to inform alternative scenarios.

Create a web-based tool that identifies levels of threats to conservation priority areas, and work with stakeholder
through a series of meetings and workshops to achieve consensus on priority areas.
Next meeting of the Funding Committee – May 15, 2017 at 1pm
FUNDING COMMITTEE





Face-to-face event
Learn about different ecoregional and larger conservation efforts
Identify overlapping, but complementary efforts
Starting point for Community of Practice across the NorthWest
Focus on landscape-scale conservation strategies
Outcomes:
 Develop a shared understanding of the different scales of
work happening and how that scaled work can be
leveraged
 Identify the existing strengths of landscape conservation
design as well as key gaps
 Identify who is doing what, sharing the stages of
development and key products – learning from others to
leverage interests and resources
 Move the conservation needle
 When? Late Fall of 2017/early Winter 2018

SUMMIT CONCEPT
“CONNECTING A LANDSCAPE
CONSERVATION COMMUNITY”
PACIFIC NORTHWEST CONSERVATION
BLUEPRINT WEBSITE
www.columbiacoastblueprint.org
Social Network Analysis Poll
https://tinyurl.com/lwv3jps