Download THE PRIVATE SECTOR COMMISSION OF GUYANA LTD

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Balance of payments wikipedia , lookup

Group of Eight wikipedia , lookup

Development theory wikipedia , lookup

Internationalization wikipedia , lookup

Development economics wikipedia , lookup

Balance of trade wikipedia , lookup

Economic globalization wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Private Sector Commission
157 Waterloo Street
North Cummingsburg, Georgetown
Tel No: 225-0977, 225-5347, 225-5339 Fax: 225-0978
Website: www.psc.org.gy E-mail: [email protected]
Speech on the Occasion of the Information Session of the European Union’s Public
Consultation on Trade and Development Communication, July 12, 2011
I am pleased to be able to address you today at the start of this information session. The
European Union has been a trading partner of Guyana’s from before the European Union
existed in its present integrated form, and it had traditionally afforded us preferential access
for our exports. As a result of this, Europe became one of our most important trading
partners and our entire economy became dependent upon trade with Europe.
This Communication which the EU is seeking to develop is an important policy document
which goes to the heart of Europe’s relationship with the developing world. It is intended
to replace the Communication of 2002 which had defined the trading link with developing
countries. The Communication on Trade and Development of 2002 saw trade as a priority
area for development policy and as a means of lifting developing countries out of poverty
and increasing their economic growth.
This last Communication stated that from 1970 to 1999, the share of developing countries
of worldwide merchandise exports rose from 25% to almost 33%. This phenomenon
accompanied a shift from primary commodities to manufactured goods. Exports from
developing countries to Europe also grew rapidly over the period so that, by the year 2000,
developing countries accounted for forty-two percent of imports into the European Union.
The Communication of 2002 emphasised effective market access for exports from
developing countries and a rules-based multilateral trading system as well as regional
integration. It also featured an EU commitment for trade-related development assistance.
However, many countries were not part of the integration process and in actuality the
export share of forty-nine Less Developed Countries has been falling. It is necessary now
to devise means of integrating these countries into the system of world trade and to find
ways to increase their share of world exports without skewing the balance of their
economies.
The world has changed since 2002, and the tide of globalisation has engulfed many
developing countries even as others have prospered from the increasing openness of their
economies. It is imperative now to devise a new Communication which takes into
consideration the effects of globalisation, the increased opportunities for trade among
developing countries and the impact of the global financial crisis which engulfed many
countries of the developed world and had spin-off effects upon developing countries as
trade contracted. For the developing world there are now also more stringent rules
regarding the environment and the use of child labour in industry.
For Guyana, trade with Europe has been increasing in recent years. In 2006, exports to
Europe represented 29% of all exports while imports from Europe accounted for only 13%
of all imports. Guyana’s exports to Europe have traditionally consisted of sugar, rice, rum,
precious stones and timber products. Exports of fish have been increasing since 2004
when Guyana was certified for fish exports to Europe. The export of traditional products
has also been growing. In 2009, forest products exports to the EU amounted to some
US$4.55m and by 2010 this had grown to US$8.1m, a 90% increase. Exports of rice have
also increased significantly. For the first half of 2010, exports of rice increased by 32.8%
over the same period in the previous year. It is necessary, however, to note that, while the
volume of exports of sugar has increased, the monetary value has fallen due to steep price
cuts as the removal of preferential prices exerted its impact. The removal of preferential
prices for exports had varying levels of impact upon different African, Caribbean and
Pacific states but was very detrimental for many of the poorest countries.
It is impossible to consider the compilation of a new EU policy on trade and development
in 2011 without consideration of the impact of the trade agreements which have been
signed with Europe by many developing countries. In Guyana, we have the EU-Cariforum
Economic Partnership Agreement which was signed reluctantly by Guyana. This
agreement allows for duty and quota free access to the European Union for all our exports
but imposes a level of openness which many feel would swamp our local industries which
cannot compete with European goods and services. Guyana had already had one of the
most open economies in the Caribbean but careful planning will be necessary to ensure that
its fledgling industries can successfully compete in the new environment.
In the wake of the trade agreements which the EU has negotiated with many developing
countries, any new Communication on Trade and Development must take into account the
types of assistance which these countries now need to be able to survive and be healthy
partners in increased global trade. Such assistance includes training and information to
meet the sanitary and phytosanitary standards demanded by the European consumer as well
as direct assistance to help them boost the levels of productivity of their export industries.
What is needed is practical assistance to bring developing countries into the fold of trading
nations so that they may benefit from, and not be swamped by, the increasing tide of
globalisation.
In closing, I would like to thank the EU Delegation and Ambassador Heikens for hosting
this Information Session. I am sure that the deliberations will be fruitful.
I thank you.