Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Discuss the issues of classification and diagnosis- Jan Mock Essay Classification systems are used in order to diagnose schizophrenia as it allows categories to be put in place that group symptoms into a syndrome, allowing diagnosis of a complex disorder. The two classification systems widely used are the DSM-IV and the ICD-10. Therefore the first issue that arises, when classifying and diagnosing schizophrenia, is the fact that different classification systems may be used and that people may be diagnosed from one system and not the other. For example, the DSM-IV involves the use of 5 diagnostic criteria compared to the ICD-10 that outlines 7. As well as this, within the DSM-IV, two symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations and affective flattening have to be present for a one month period, which differs from the criteria of the ICD-10. This therefore creates a cultural bias due to the difference in the use of classification systems depending on culture which thus reduces the reliability of diagnosis. Read et al. for example, found only a 37% concordance rate when diagnosing schizophrenia and noted a 1970 study, which found that when assessing the same patients, US clinicians diagnosed 69% of these patients with schizophrenia whereas only 5% were diagnosed by clinicians from the UK. This therefore exemplifies the issue of a achieving a completely reliable diagnosis for schizophrenia, suggesting that schizophrenia is still a condition so unknown in terms of what causes it and symptoms of it that there is difficulty in reliably diagnosing it, especially using more than one criteria. Another issue produced by schizophrenia, which reduces reliability of diagnosis, is the issue of co-morbidity, especially when symptoms similar to those of depression are presented. As well as this, schizophrenia, as with other mental disorders, is something that has no physical symptoms and can only be diagnosed in terms of anecdotal evidence of symptoms, which thus increases the difficulty in coming to a reliable diagnosis when treating schizophrenia. In terms of reliability of classification systems, although Read’s evidence suggests it may be unreliable, Beck et al. found only a concordance rate of 54% when diagnosing 153 patients, however Soderberg, using up-to-date classification systems (DSM-IV-TR) found an 81% concordance rate in diagnosing schizophrenia, suggesting that reliability of diagnosis has become better over time. Research by Jackobsen et al (2004) also supports this because when assessing 100 Danish patients, they found a concordance rate of 98% suggesting high level of reliability in diagnosis. It could therefore be argued that some of the issues of classification and diagnosis have been dealt with. In terms of classifying schizophrenia, multiple classification systems have been used other than the DSM and ICD such as the Schneider criteria, which can be used to help in reliably diagnosing schizophrenia. Farmer at al. also found high reliability using the PSE technique (Present State Examination), showing that more than two classification systems can be implemented when diagnosis schizophrenia. This implies that perhaps diagnosis of schizophrenia is more reliable than first assumed. As a whole, the classification systems are important in allowing a communication of findings and ideas between practitioners and they allow a ‘common language’ for the ideas to be communicated. Other issues of classification and diagnosis involve issues of validity. Heather et al. argued that few causes of mental disorders are known and found that there is only a 50% chance in predicting the treatment a patient will receive based on their symptoms and diagnosis. This suggests that classification and diagnosis has low predictive validity, which is an issue in accurately diagnosing patients. Cochrane et al also found that there may again be an issue of cultural bias. Within the West Indies and the UK there is a 1% prevalence of schizophrenia yet in the UK Caribbean’s are diagnosed seven times more than British people. This either suggests that Caribbean’s have more stressors once they have moved to the UK, or suggests that there is a clear cultural bias within the medical profession when diagnosing people with possible schizophrenia, perhaps because people of other cultures have more untraditional and unusual lifestyles and cultures (as seen from the perspective of someone from a western culture, for example). This evidence of cultural bias is supported by Whaley el al. who found that black Americans were more likely to be diagnosed as being schizophrenic compared to white Americans, again suggesting that there is low validity within classification and diagnosis of schizophrenia. Kendel and Jablensky, however, argued that although the validity of diagnosing schizophrenia may not be entirely accurate, schizophrenia as a concept allows practitioners to have a using framework for diagnosing mental disorder and allows a treatment for such mental disorders to be found. Scheff raised the issue that there is a problem with diagnosing disorders like schizophrenia for it creates ‘sticky labels’ that are hard to get rid of in terms of being categorised as a schizophrenic, where people may actually see you as your condition and may eventually lead to a ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’ in which a person behaves in a way as to fulfil the criteria of their condition. It may also allow them to behave in a negative way and blame their condition for their actions. This consequently creates ethical issues, for diagnosing people has schizophrenic would reduce their job prospects as well as reduce their ability to create positive and meaningful relationships as they may deem themselves unworthy if they are schizophrenic or their diagnosis may drive other people away from them for fear of the schizophrenic’s unknown and unpredictable behaviour. Overall, there are a variety of issues in terms of validity and reliability of classifications and diagnosis of schizophrenia such as cultural bias and the issue of different classification systems, therefore these issues need to be taken into consideration when diagnosing someone as schizophrenic.