Download Landscape dynamics and conservation decisions Applied

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

World Wide Fund for Nature wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup

Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup

Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup

Operation Wallacea wikipedia , lookup

Index of environmental articles wikipedia , lookup

Conservation agriculture wikipedia , lookup

Marine conservation wikipedia , lookup

Conservation biology wikipedia , lookup

Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Conservation psychology wikipedia , lookup

Conservation movement wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Landscape dynamics and conservation decisions
Applied conservation is about deciding what to do where and when. We have a suite
of excellent tools and theories for deciding what to do where, traditional conservation
planning, however we do not have easy to use tools for deciding when to take those
actions. In this talk I define the dynamic prioritization problem and give examples of
how we are tackling that problem. I use the talk to emphasise two important issues in
conservation problem solving: 1) the difference between models, problems and
algorithms in applied conservation, and 2) the difficulty in setting objectives. The
talk will draw on papers such as:
Bode M., Wilson K.A., Brooks T.M., Turner W.R., Mittermeier R.A., McBride M.F., Underwood
E.C. & Possingham H.P. (2008). Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to
taxonomic group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 105, 6498-6501.
Drechsler, M., R. Lourival, and H. P. Possingham. 2009. Conservation planning for successional
landscapes. Ecological Modelling 220:438-450.
Meir, E., S. Andelman, and H. P. Possingham. 2004. Does conservation planning matter in a
dynamic and uncertain world? Ecology Letters 7:615-622.
McBride M.F., Wilson K.A., Bode M. & Possingham H.P. (2007). Incorporating the effects of
socioeconomic uncertainty into priority setting for conservation investment. Conserv. Biol.,
21, 1463-1474.
McCarthy M.A. & Possingham H.P. (2007). Active adaptive management for conservation.
Conserv. Biol., 21, 956-963
McDonald-Madden E., Bode M., Game E.T., Grantham H. & Possingham H.P. (2008). The need for
speed: informed land acquisitions for conservation in a dynamic property market. Ecology
Letters, 11, 1169-1177
Richards, S. A. Possingham, H. P. and Tizard, J. 1999. Optimal fire management for maintaining
community diversity . Ecological Applications 8:156
Wilson, K. A., M. McBride, M. Bode, and H. P. Possingham. 2006. Prioritising global conservation
efforts. Nature 440:337-340