Download ppt - Indico

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup

Super-Kamiokande wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup

Cross section (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Study of J/ψ photoproduction in
ultra-peripheral Au+Au collisions
at √sNN=200GeV using the PHENIX
detector
Akihisa Takahara
CNS University of Tokyo,RIKEN
For THE PHENIX collaboration
Autum JPS 2011
1
Ultra Peripheral Collision
b>2R
γ
γ
Characteristics of UPC
→strong  - source
(X) Z2 ~ 6·103
()  Z4 ~ 4·107
@Au(79)
No Nuclear overlap
→ low background
relativistic charged
particle generates
strong
electromagnetic
field in transverse
plane
~ large gamma flux
RHIC max. photon
energies(EPA):
3 GeV~γ/R
UPC J/ψ pT^2
distribution
(Theoretical)
Coherent(γAu):
low pt peak
Incoherent(γn):
wider pt distribution
(Incoherent + neutron
tagged :
Yellow shadow )
Wmax  6GeV
WNmax  34GeV
Autum JPS 2011
2
UPC J/ψ physics
Low x PDF
Photoproduction process is sensitive
To gluon distribution
We can see Q2≒2.5, x≒0.01
region by UPC J/psi cross section
measurement at RHIC
Theoretical predictions
And 2004 result
Phys.Rev.C78:044904,2008
Large Uncertainty
UPC is good probe to study
low x R(x,Q^2)
Autum JPS 2011
3
Previous result and motivation
J. Nystrand, Nucl. Phys. A
752(2005)470c; A.J. Baltz, S.R. Klein,
J. Nystrand, PRL 89(2002)012301;
S.R. Klein, J. Nystrand, Phys. Rev. C
60(1999)014903
M. Strikman, M. Tverskoy and M.
Zhalov, Phys. Lett. B 626 72 (2005)
V. P. Goncalves and M. V. T.
Machado, arXiv:0706.2810 (2007).
Yu. P. Ivanov, B. Z. Kopeliovich and I.
Schmidt, arXiv:0706.1532 (2007).
Coherent theoretical
prediction
Incoherent theoretical
prediction
PHENIX already measured total cross section at central rapidity
• To study more detail of low x PDF,
• pT dependence of cross section
• forward-rapidity measurement
Autum JPS 2011
4
UPC measurement in PHENIX
(at 2007central rapidity)
n
e+
e-
Coherent UPC
50-60%
UPC trigger(for central arm)
1. No MB trigger:BBC VETO
2. 1 or 2 neutron :ZDC
3. Emcal (>1GeV):ε(pt)
Zvertex information was calculated from
Track extrapolation
√sNN=200GeV, AuAu ,530/μb
Autum JPS 2011
5
Pt dependence of UPC J/ψ+Xn
cross section for 2007 run central
It is the first measurement of pT dependence of UPC J/psi
Coherent part(lower pT peak) is dominant.
Autum JPS 2011
6
UPC measurement in PHENIX(at
2010 forward rapidity)
Due to nose cone(Fe,hadron
suppressor),
We can’t get Z vertex from track
extrapolation.
Then we required BOTH ZDC
tagging for forward rapidity
analysis
UPC trigger(for muon arms)
1. No MB trigger:BBC VETO:ε≒1
2. 1 or 2 neutron :ZDC:ε≒1
3. At least 2tracks reach middle of MUID
Autum JPS 2011
√sNN=200GeV, AuAu ,1400/μb
7
Pt dependence of UPC
J/ψ+Xn(N)+Xn(S) cross section for
2007 & 10 run
Autum JPS 2011
8
UPC dσ/dy distribution
J/ψ+Xn(N)+Xn(S)
1n tagging data and
Theoretical curve
J. Nystrand, Nucl. Phys. A 752(2005)470c; A.J. Baltz,
If “both tagging ” doesn’t change rapidity shape,
Looks like strikman curve
Autum JPS 2011
S.R. Klein, J. Nystrand, PRL 89(2002)012301; S.R.
Klein, J. Nystrand, Phys. Rev. C 60(1999)014903
M. Strikman, M. Tverskoy and M. Zhalov, Phys. Lett.
B 626 72 (2005)
V. P. Goncalves and M. V. T. Machado,
arXiv:0706.2810 (2007).
Yu. P. Ivanov, B. Z. Kopeliovich and I. Schmidt,
arXiv:0706.1532 (2007).
9
Summary and outlook
Summary
• PHENIX first measurement pt dependence of UPC J/psi cross section at
central and forward rapidity
Outlook
– Future measurement with silicon detector at PHENIX. We can get Z vertex
forward silicon
– ALICE measurement at lower bjorken x
Autum JPS 2011
10
Back up
Autum JPS 2011
11
RHIC and PHENIX
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider,
at the Brookhaven National
Laboratory (NY,USA)
•About 4km circumference
(Second largest of Ion collider)
•Center of mass energy per nucleons
~200GeV(AuAu),~500GeV(pp)
•AuAu, pp, d+Au,CuCu
2007-RUN
2010-RUN
•AuAu
•“200GeV
•~530/μb
•AuAu
•“200GeV
~1400/μb
Autum JPS 2011
12
The experimental signatures
and the analysis
UPC signatures
Only e+ e- pair in central arm
At least 1 neutron
Analysis cut
•Vertex cut:|Zvertex|<30cm
•ZDC north || south>30GeV
•Number of electron candidate
tracks==2
•No real track other than
2 electron candidate tracks.
•BBC veto(offline)
•Electron(positron) id
•RICH associated
•Emcal matching
Autum JPS 2011
13
RHIC and PHENIX
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider,
at the Brookhaven National
Laboratory (NY,USA)
•About 4km circumference
(Second largest of Ion collider)
•Center of mass energy per nucleons
~200GeV(AuAu),~500GeV(pp)
•AuAu, pp, d+Au,CuCu
2007-RUN
•AuAu
•“200GeV
• Integrated Luminosity is4 times larger than last 2004 AuAu run
Autum JPS 2011
14
Autum JPS 2011
15
RUN7 central UPC trigger
n
Coherent UPC:
γ+γ → e+e-, γ+A→ X+J/ψ:
lower pt<0.3GeV
Incoherent UPC:
γ+n → n+J/ψ :
wider pt
e+
Coherent UPC
e-
50-60%
ee pairs from UPC J/psi is measured by tagging forward neutron emission
UPC trigger
1. BBC detect no charge
2. EMCal energy threshold
1.0GeV
3. 1 or 2 ZDC detects
neutron
Autum JPS 2011
16
Previous result
RHIC average
photon energy
corresponds to
24GeV
PHENIX 2004
•HERA -ZEUS measured γp-> J/psi photo
production cross section.
However , In general σ(A)≠σ(p).
•PHENIX measured UPC J/psi cross section at 2004.
•The result includes all theoretical predictions within 1sigma
Motivation
•To improve error to get enough quality to find fittest theoretical
predicition ->
2007 run has 4times statistics
Autum JPS 2011
17
Comparison with HERA data
HERA data;
coh:incoh rate
Alpha_coh
Alpha_incoh
30.4:30.4
0.94
(for run 4:
1.01 ± 0.07)
0.86
(for run 4:
0.92 ± 0.08)
Please note this
calculation is
0.98-0.97
0.82-0.83
We don’t have
enough statistic to
separate coherent
and incoherent
Strikman(40:27-29:21)x
60.8/(coh+incoh)
Koperiovich
1.01
(53:21-61:24) x
60.8/(coh+incoh)
Alpha=1Hard probe scaling
Alpha=2/3 Soft probe scaling
0.75
Autum JPS 2011
just a trial.
18
Autum JPS 2011
19
Cross section compared to
theoretical calculation
Some coherent
prediction looks
enough to explain
the result.
However measured
pT spectra suggest
both coherent and
incoherent J/psi
production
J. Nystrand, Nucl. Phys. A 752(2005)470c; A.J. Baltz,
Run7:54.1±14.6 +10.3/-9.7μb
Run4(published data):76±31(stat)±11(sys) μb
Run 4& 7 combined
60.8±13.7(stat)+10.5−10.1(sys) μb. Autum JPS 2011
S.R. Klein, J. Nystrand, PRL 89(2002)012301; S.R.
Klein, J. Nystrand, Phys. Rev. C 60(1999)014903
M. Strikman, M. Tverskoy and M. Zhalov, Phys. Lett.
B 626 72 (2005)
V. P. Goncalves and M. V. T. Machado,
arXiv:0706.2810 (2007).
Yu. P. Ivanov, B. Z. Kopeliovich and I. Schmidt,
arXiv:0706.1532 (2007).
20
characteristics of continuum and
coherent J/psi
γγ→ee
•Low pt peak
•Exp fitting
(~exp(-2.1mass))
J/psi
Coherent
•Low pt peak
•Gaussian fitting
STARLIGHT model with GEANT simulation
pT<0.8
Same simulation for coherent UPC J/psi
Likesign
unlikesign
Autum JPS 2011
21
2004-2007 combined result
Run 4& 7 combined
60.8±13.7(stat)+10.5−10.1(sys) μb.
Compared to statistical error
•Strikman:
•Color dipole model
•Impluse or glauber approximation
1.2<|y|< 2.4 covered by
PHENIX muon arm, and
we have taken data
at RUN 10 &7.
Muon UPC will be analyzed
•+0.47- -0.62sigma
•Kopeliovich:
•Color dipole model+
gluon saturation effects
•KST or GBW parameterization
•+1.78- +1.05sigma
Strikman looks better
Autum JPS 2011
22
Invariant mass
•No likesign pair
•43 ee pairs at mee>2GeV
•Clear J/psi peak
•Clear γγ→ee(Continumm)
Of course we have γγ→ee pair in J/psi region.
To estimate N(J/psi)
•Fitting function should be
Gaussian(J/psi) +continuum curve
•Continuum shape was estimated by
STARLIGHT simulation with PHENIX
detectors and trigger efficiency for
electrons
NJ/psi:18.75+-5.05(sta)+-0.25(sys)
Autum JPS 2011
23
Pair pt
•Low J/psi pTpeak
suggest s
coherent UPC
•Some higher pT
event s suggests
Incoherent UPC
Red cross
symbols
correspond to
this region
Simulated data has
1000times larger
Statistics. However their
Max pT <0.8
At least, their incoherent events
We can see UPC
coherent (γAu) &incoherent (γn) J/Ψ production
Autum JPS 2011
24
Fix pt vs 1-(1-eff_trg1)(1-eff_trg2)
~run 23500
run 23500~
nonpol
pol
Autum JPS 2011
25
Glauber_mc
• offline/analysis/glauber_mc
•Au Au 200GeV default setting
•Trial
:500000
•Ncoll>=1
:272216
•Bbcnq==0||bbcsq==0:7388
Ineficiency=2.7%
bbcnq+bbcsq:for mass plot
Average ncoll at bbcsq==0||bbcnq==0
1.72
bbcnq+bbcsq:for sim
At bbcnq==0||bbcsq==0
Autum JPS 2011
26