Download Definitions of “Queer Theory“

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Heterosexuality wikipedia, lookup

Lesbian sexual practices wikipedia, lookup

Gay pornography wikipedia, lookup

LGBT themes in speculative fiction wikipedia, lookup

Sexual ethics wikipedia, lookup

History of homosexuality wikipedia, lookup

Homosexuality wikipedia, lookup

Gay wikipedia, lookup

LGBT history wikipedia, lookup

Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women wikipedia, lookup

Sex and sexuality in speculative fiction wikipedia, lookup

Australian Lesbian and Gay Archives wikipedia, lookup

Lesbian erotica wikipedia, lookup

LGBT social movements wikipedia, lookup

Non-heterosexual wikipedia, lookup

Gender roles in non-heterosexual communities wikipedia, lookup

LGBT stereotypes wikipedia, lookup

Homosexuality in society wikipedia, lookup

LGBT wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
Definitions of “Queer Theory“
The term “QUEER“
• The process of ascribing new, positive meaning to the
word “ queer,“ though, has to be seen within the context
of the ever-changing terminology that same-sex sexual
communities use to describe themselves. In general
terms, we have moved from the “homosexuals“ of the
first half of the twentieth century to a small number of
“homophiles“ in the 1950s: from “gay liberation“ in the
early seventies to the lesbian and gay movements of the
mid-eighties and early nineties to contemporary lesbian,
gay, bisexual, and transgender or “queer“ activism.
These changes reflect the dynamic nature of both
sexuality and the political organizing that has developed
around it.
(Introduction to Queer Studies. Ed. Brett Beemyn and
Mickey Eliason 5)
• GLBT (Gay-Lesbian-Bi-Transsexuals/-genders
Teresa de Lauretis. „Queer Theory“ in differences 1991
• ...the terms „lesbian“ and „gay“ designate distinct
kinds of life-styles, sexualities, sexual practices,
communities, issues, publications, and discourses; on
the other hand the phrase „gay and lesbian“ or, more
and more frequently, „lesbian and gay“ (ladies first),
has become standard currency. ... In a sense, the term
„Queer Theory“ was arrived at in the effort to avoid all
of these fine distinctions in our discursive protocols,
not to adhere to any one of the given terms, not to
assume their ideological liabilities but instead to both
transgress and transcend them—or at the very least to
problematize them.
Annamarie Jagose, Queer Theory: An Introduction
• Broadly speaking, queer describes those
gestures or analytical models which dramatise
incoherences in the allegedly stable relations
between chromosomal sex, gender and sexual
desire. Resisting that model of stability—which
claims heterosexuality as its origin, when it is
more properly its effects—queer focuses on
mismatches between sex, gender and desire.
(p. 3)
Rosemary Hennessy: „Queer Theory: A Review of the differences
Special Issue and Wittig‘s The Straight Mind.“ Signs 18 (1993)
• Queer theory calls into question obvious
categories (man, woman, latina, Jew,
butch, femme), oppositions (man vs.
woman, heterosexual vs. homosexual), or
equations (gender = sex) upon which
conventional notions of sexuality and
identity rely.(964)
Nina Degele „Heteronormativität entselbstverständlichen“
in Queering Gender-Queering Society.
FreiburgerFrauenstudien 17 (2005)
• [Die Queer Studies] wollen keine „normale“
wissenschaftliche Disziplin sein, sondern
vielmehr die etablierte gesellschaftliche Ordnung
als zweigeschlechtlich und heterosexuell
organisierte Zwangsveranstaltung auf den Kopf
stellen—mit wissenschaftlichen Mitteln….
Wissensprodukte, Organisationsprinzipien und
Institutionen entlarven und sezieren queere
DenkerInnen mit viel Kreativität und Fleiß als
„heteronormativ“. (p. 15)
Lauren Berlant and Michael Warner: “Sex in Public”
• Heteronormativity refers to:
“the institutions, structures of
understanding, and practical orientation
that make heterosexuality not only
coherent—that is, organised as a
sexuality—but also privileged” (565, note
2)