Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IT Regional geophysical setting of the Rio Grande rift LiNDRITH CORDELL U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225 ABSTRACT The Rio Grande rift encompasses uplifts of the southern Rocky Mountains and their southern extension as well as axial fault blocks. The rift widens irregularly southward from a narrow horst in Colorado into j broad collapsed vault, characterized by grabens, in southern New Mexico. Whether manifested by horsts or grabens, primarily extensional strain is involved which increases in magnitude southward. Extensional faulting along the rift occurred in N'eogene to Quaternary time, but the rift follows an axis of Laramide, Pennsylvanian, and possibly earlier uplifts. Gravity gradients due to the low density of graben fill delineate major faults of the rift system, which show a gridded or en echelon pattern over distances of tens of kilometres. Aeromagnetic data show these faults to be aligned with basement structural grain. Zigzags hundreds of kilometres long in the trend of the rift may also be related to basement grain. Basement trends in the Colorado Plateau to the west seem to differ in direction from those in the High Plains to the east. Seismic data also show that the rift occurs in an area of transition between anomalous crustal and upper mantle structure typical of the Cordillera and crustal structure typical of the High Plains. Deep seismic data are sparse within the rift, but high heat flow, high elevation, high electrical conductivity, and both residual positive (shallow source) and negative (deep source) gravity anomalies suggest the presence of symmetrical anomalous crustal and upper-mantle structure along the axis of the rift. In the Socorro area, where the rift has been studied intensively, available data indicate relatively low compressional velocity, rapid Holocene uplift, and the presence of magma within the crust. In view of geomorphic evidence for widespread Holocene faulting, the seismicity of the rift is surprisingly low. INTRODUCTION AND GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND This paper provides a review of results of geophysical studies in the Rio Grande rift. The rift trends northward across New Mexico and Colorado, the location of its sides and endpoints depending somewhat on one's definition of a rift. Mixed usage of the terms "rift" and "graben" is useful in this regard: a nearly continuous "Rio Grande graben" extends along the axis of the southern Rocky Mountains uplift from Leadville, Colorado, to Santa Fe, New Mexico, and continues southward in New Mexico to Socorro (Fig. 1). The graben is about 25 to 50 km wide. In contradistinction to this, the term "Rio Grande rift" entails genetic concepts that extend the area of consideration to include en echelon and bifurcating uplifts far to the north of Leadville and south of Socorro, and into the Basin and Range1 country of southern New Mexico, west Texas, and the Republic of Mexico. As used here, the term "rift" also encompasses flanking uplifted borders and previously uplifted borders that have subsequently been dropped along zones of antithetic faults. The width of the "rift" is several hundred kilometres. Hammond (1964) subdivided the western United States into four major physiographic types: plains, tablelands, mountains, and mountains-in-plains. These physiographic subdivisions have characteristic geophysical signatures and reflect an evolutionary sequence that is strikingly developed in the Rio Grande rift. Major faults of the rift system are shown with a locality index and physiographic province map in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows generalized elevation contours. As is apparent in Figures 1 and 2, the rift follows an axis of high mountains. The southern Rocky Mountain system here, as in the earliest geological study of the rift (Lee, 1907), is considered to extend into Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 89, p. 1073-1090, 15 figs., July 1978, Doc. no. 80710. 1073 southernmost New Mexico (Fig. 2). The Colorado Plateau (the large "tablelands" tract near the center of Fig. 1) is rimmed by mountains, and tableland country similar to the plateau extends east of the southern Rocky Mountains. En echelon offsets characterize the rift throughout New Mexico and Colorado. In New Mexico the graben borders are offset, but the axis of the graben is essentially continuous. In Colorado the graben and related fault structure north of Leadville comprise separate elements en echelon in a right-lateral sense. The most recent episode of uplift and extensional faulting along the rift occurred in Neogene and Quaternary time, although prior episodes of tectonism have occurred along this same trend. Geophysical discontinuities along the axis of the rift suggest inherited Precambrian structural grain. Linear uplift, arkosic sedimentation, and high-angle faulting occurred along the rift in Pennsylvanian-Permian and Late Cretaceous-middle Eocene (Laramide) time, separated by episodes of planation during . late Mesozoic time (compare Cordell, 1976a, Fig. 4) and again during the late Eocene (Epis and Chapin, 1975). The approximate coincidence of uplifts in time (Chapin and Seager, 1975; Tweto, 1975) is apparent in New Mexico and especially in Colorado, even to the superposition of Holocene and Pennsylvanian alluvial fans along the mountain front (Howard, 1966). An extensive surface of generally low relief, developed during late Eocene time (Epis and Chapin, 1975; Seager, 1975), provides a structural datum separating the rift from earlier structural regimes. Voluminous andesitic, calc-alkalic magmatism (Elston, 1976) was initiated about 37 m.y. B.P. A chain of these primarily Oligocene andesites occurs within the rift, and is restricted to the rift, between the Davis Plateau in Texas (300 km south of El Paso; Fig. 1) and North Park in Colorado. Extensional faulting began 25 to 29 m.y. 300 KILOMETERS ' ^W""-:>--^ Figure 1. Locality index, major physiographic provinces (modified from Hammond, 1964), and faults of Rio Grande rift. Heavy lines show princ faults of Rio Grande graben, determined primarily from gravity data. Odier faults (from Woodward, and others, 1975; Dane and Bachman, 1965; other sources) are shown schematically with lighter lines. Base map showing Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico modified from U.S. Geolog Survey shaded relief maps, scale 1:500,000. NP = North Park, D = Denver, L = Leadville, SVF = San Juan volcanic field, JVF = Jemez volcanic field, = Mount Taylor, SF = Santa Fe, A = Alburquerque, JL = Jemez lineament (with arrows), S = Socorro, DMVF = Daril-Mogollon volcanic field, LC = Cruces, EP = El Paso, SM = Sacramento Mountains, GM = Guadalupe Mountains. 300 KILOMETERS J Figure 2. Generalized elevation, in metres, relative to sea level, of Rio Grande rift. Contour interval is 500 m. Heavy lines show major faults of axial graben, located primarily by gravity data; light lines show schematically other faults of rift and possibly related structure. 1076 ago, according to Chapin and Seager (1975) and Seager (1975), who described the Neogene tectonic development in central and southern New Mexico in terms of initial extension during latest Oligocene and early Miocene time, characterized by broad warping and transition from calc-alkalic to "basaltic andesite" volcanism. Uplift, extensive block faulting, and bimodal basaltrhyolite volcanism ("fundamentally basalt volcanism" in the sense of Christiansen and Lipman, 1972, and Lipman and others, 1972) occurred during latest Miocene and Pliocene time. Similarly, Scott (1975) and Taylor (1975) described accelerated uplift during Pliocene time in Colorado. Tholeiitic basalt occurs along the axis of the rift in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico, according to Lipman (1969) and Lipman and Mehnert (1975), who showed that the tholeiite fractionated at shallow depth within an inferred mantle bulge. Kudo and others (1971; Kudo, 1976) have pointed out, however, that in central New Mexico tholeiites also occur west of the axial graben, in the vicinity of Mt. Taylor. Laughlin and others (1972) have also emphasized that a chain of Quaternary basalts trends northeastward from the Mt. Taylor area obliquely across the graben along the Jemez lineament (Fig. 1; Lambert, 1966). This is true, but, as discussed below, these basalts occur within the rift as broadly defined. The distribution of basalts along the Jemez lineament may reflect the intersection of the rift with a transverse structural discontinuity within the Precambrian basement. Basement structure has been assumed to have played an important role in the Cenozoic development of the rift, but the concept has remained conjectural because of the difficulty of mapping in three dimensions. T L. CORDELL berg and Smithson (1975), Cordell and others (1973), and Cordell (1972, 1976a, 1976b), forms the basis for drawing the principal graben border faults as shown in Figures 1 through 7. The faults display a northwest-northeast gridded pattern in southern New Mexico (Ramberg and Smithson, 1975). A similar gridded pattern is observed in the western part of the graben in New Mexico north of Socorro. Here, however, the eastern margin of the graben comprises north-trending en echelon faults. Gravity data can also be used to estimate structural relief across the graben faults, although the estimates are subject to errors in assigned densities and other factors (Joesting and others, 1961). Estimated structural relief is typically 2 to 3 km and, exceptionally, as much as 5 km. Larger structural relief reported for the San Luis basin in southern Colorado may be in error, due to suspected error in elevation control (W. F. Isherwood and G. R. Keller, 1976, oral commun.). Apart from the shallow-source gravity anomalies caused by low-density sedimentary rocks, two broad, deep-source anomalies are observed. A residual broad positive gravity anomaly attributed to the penetration of mantle material into the crust occurs along the rift axis (Cordell, 1976a). A very broad negative anomaly is associated with the regional uplift. These show up best on profiles and will be discussed in connection with Figures 9 through 15. A Bouguer gravity anomaly map of the Four Corners states is shown in Figure 3. Sparse seismic data (Fig. 5) indicate regional variation in seismic velocity of the upper mantle, suggesting that the broad features in the gravity map are related to density variation within the upper mantle as well as variation in crustal thickness. The broad topographic and gravity features (Figs. 2, 3) coincide, reflecting rapid GRAVITY DATA buoyant response (Bridwell, 1976) to regional density changes in the crust or manGravity data facilitate mapping the gra- tle related to Neogene tectonics. Like the ben border faults, basement structural uplifts, the associated broad gravity lows grain, and deep-crustal and upper-mantle are Neogene in age. Gravity anomalies associated with essenstructure related to Neogene tectonics, although the gravity effects of all of these tially static intracrustal density variation are superimposed. Gravity gradients related include those associated with the lithology to low-density graben fill delineate major of the sedimentary cover, such as the graben faults of the rift system having displace- fill anomaly; Paleogene batholiths in ments of several kilometres each. These southwestern Colorado, southwestern New faults commonly do not follow the trend of Mexico, and perhaps elsewhere (Plouff and smaller faults mapped at the surface. The Pakiser, 1972; Steven, 1975; Elston and use of gravity data in mapping the graben others, 1973, 1976); and intrabasement border faults is discussed in detail elsewhere density variation in eastern New Mexico (Cordell, 1970, 1976a). This interpretation, and elsewhere. The long northeast-trending plus reference to gravity maps of Sanford gravity gradient crossing northeastern (1968), Kleinkopf and others (1970), Ram- Arizona and the extreme northwest corner of New Mexico (Fig. 3), not apparent eithc in the topography (Fig. 2) or in the structur of the sedimentary cover, is associated VVJ.L an aeromagnetic lineament and probabl delineates a northeast-trending Precarn brian discontinuity. A parallel northeast trending gravity gradient may be present in New Mexico, intersecting the rift obliqUe|y between Santa Fe and Socorro, but this trend, if it exists at all, is obscured by grav. ity trends related directly to the rift. AEROMAGNETIC DATA Aeromagnetic coverage of Colorado js available at a flight-line spacing of l.g t0 8.0 km (Zietz and Kirby, 1972), and coverage of Arizona is available at a flight-line spacing of 5 km (Sauck and Sumner, 197Q) In New Mexico, aeromagnetic surveys were flown at 1.6-km flight-line spacing, although coverge does not yet extend far east nor west of the rift; all the available data are shown in Figure 4. The New Mexico aeromagnetic data are available as U.S. Geological Survey Open-File maps at a scale of 1:125,000 and a contour interval of 20y. Generalized trends are shown at a contour interval of 100 y in Figure 4. Rocks of the sedimentary cover are effectively nonmagnetic. Except over areas of extensive volcanic or shallow intrusive rocks, the magnetic anomaly gradients delineate structural or lithologic boundaries in the Precambrian basement. In a preliminary analysis, I have shown that aeromagnetic gradients and inferred basement structures are aligned with graben border faults in central New Mexico (Cordell, 1976a). The alignment can be seen' in various places in Figure 4. On the basis of the observed parallelism t>f graben faults with magnetic anomaly trends, it seems likely that inherited Precambrian basement grain has influenced, in a passive way, the trend of Cenozoic graben faults at a scale of tens of kilometres. Principal regional trends in the magnetic anomaly gradients which are thought to be representative of basement structural grain are indicated on the gravity map (Fig. 3) by dotted lines. In this preliminary identification, the selection of trends and the evaluation of the effects of volcanic cover and basement relief are subjective. Together with trends in the graben border faults, which are in part basement controlled, the aeromagnetic trends seem to indicate a change in basement grain across the rift. Trends are more or less north-south, northeast, or random in the High Plains east of the rift. To the west the trends are strongly northwest or northeast, and the rift seems REGIONAL GEOPHYSICAL SETTING OF THE RIO GRANDE RIFT 't either rructu rc ed with robably 'recarn. 'theast-sent in 'liquely ut this v grav- to zigzag along these conjugate directions. An aeromagnetic gradient (Sauck and Sumner, 1970) is associated with the pronounced northeast-trending gravity gradient in northeastern Arizona, and both are attributed to a source in the Precambrian basement. A parallel magnetic gradient to the west, however, is not associated with any obvious gravity trend. A major northeast-trending age-province boundary also occurs across eastern Arizona and northwestern New Mexico (L. T. Silver, 1077 unpub. data). At the latitude of Albuquerque, tholeiitic basalt occurs west of the axial graben along the northeast-trending Jemez lineament (Fig. 1). From this general area southward, the rift widens and changes character. ado is 1.6 to coverht-line 1970). •were cin §, id far liable New ">le as sat a v'alof icon•ffecIS Df jsive ,dessin nary netic ures s in The :s in ;ralletic herhas 1 of •tic be lin by cajand •et rs, 'ie a it. h>f -160 to -200 -200 to - 2 4 O y IS <-240 Figure 3. Bouguer gravity anomaly contours and trends of aeromagnetic gradients (dotted lines) thought to be related to structure in Precambrian basement. Base map showing generalized trends of rift faults is from Figure 1. Gravity map is generalized from map prepared by Defense Mapping Agency, Aerospace Center, St. Louis Air Force Station, St. Louis, Missouri, for publication with U.S. National Atlas. 104° Gravity and aeromagnetic data considered together suggest that the Colorado Plateau is characterized and delimited by elements of conjugate northwest-northeast basement grain. Lack of parallelism with trends in the craton east of the plateau could indicate that the plateau was appended onto the craton during Precambrian time, forming a basement suture along the site of the future rift. Such a feature could account for the observed angulation and en echelon pattern of the rift as well as the recurrence of tectonism along these trends. At present, evidence for a suture is circumstantial. Completion of the aeromagnetic coverage in eastern and northwestern New Mexico should establish whether parallelism exists in the basement grain east and west of the rift. Preliminary interpretation of the deep seismic reflection data (Oliver and Kaufman, 1976; Kaufman and others, 1977) suggests a fundamental crustal discontinuity within the rift, as discussed below. SEISMIC DATA AND SEISMIOTY Noninstrumental historical records since 1849 indicate a concentration of seismicity along the rift which probably can be attributed only in pan to concentration of population in the Rio Grande Valley (Sanford and others, 1972; Northrop, 1976). In discussing more recent instrumental data, Sanford and others (1972, 1976), Olsen and others (1976), and Smith and Sbar (1974) described belts of seismicity along the Rio Grande graben, the northeasttrending Jemez lineament, and the arcuate fault zone across northern New Mexico, southwestern Colorado, and eastern Utah 35° (Fig. 1). All of these are included within the rift as broadly defined here. The highest level of seismicity occurs within the rift between Socorro and Albuquerque. It should be noted, however, that the seismicity of the rift, at least as determined instrumentally since 1960, is much lower than that of the intermountain seismic belt (compare Smith and Sbar, 1974, Fig. 2) and the East African (Fairhead and Girdler, 1971; Wohlenberg, 34° i 1975), Baikal (Solonenko, 1968), and perhaps other Neogene-Quaternary rifts. The comparatively low level of anomalous seismicity associated with the Rio Grande rift seemingly is not an artifact of insufficient data. Noting the abundance of figure 4. Total magnetic intensity map over Rio Grande graben. Contour interval is 100 y, generalized from large-scale maps cited in text. Contour labels are removed because flight levels and Holocene fault scarps in the Socorro area, Sanford and others (1972) estimated longreduction datum are not uniform. REGIONAL GEOPHYSICAL SETTING OF THE RIO GRANDE RIFT seismicity using King and Knopoff s ) equation relating fault length, offset, J associated earthquake magnitude. They nc [ u ded that the historical record showrelatively modest seismicity along the rift is probably representative of longer term trends, although their analysis of paleoseismicity was admittedly subject to considerable uncertainty. More recently, soil studies (Machette, 1976) and geologic 1079 mapping in progress by Machette, G. O. Bachman, C. E. Chapin, and others (1977, oral communs.) have brought to light more large fault scarps, some of which can be dated. Because of the importance, in terms %$M$&&3m " - - - ' ZOO KILOMETERS Figure 5. Seismic data, showing dq>th in kilometres below sea level to M discontinuity and, in parentheses, compressional wave velocity of upper mantle in kilometres per second. Stars denote shot points. Arrows at stars indicate reversed profiles; arrows at dots indicate nonreversed profiles. Location of first vibroseis profile in New Mexico by Consortium on Continental Reflection Profiling (Oliver and Kaufman, 1976) is shown by label COCORP. Recently (Kaufman and others, 1977), these profiles have been extended across western border of graben. Dashed lines show pans of western border of Colorado Plateau. Sources: a, Hill and Pakiser (1967); b, Ryall and Stuart (1963); c, Keller and others (1975) and Braile and others (1974); d, Roller (1965); e, L. Pakiser (1977, personal commun.); f, Jackson and Pakiser (1965); g, Jackson and others (1963); h, Warren (1969); i, Toppozada and Sanford (1976) and Toppozada (1974); j, crustal "low-rigidity" zone of Sanford and others (1973); k, Stewart and Pakiser (1962). L. CORDELL 1080 of tectonics and seismic risk, of determining the long-term seismicity of the rift, it would be worthwhile to update the paleoseismicity analysis. During the early 1960s several long seismic refraction lines in the western United States (Pakiser, 1963} were obtained by the U.S. Geological Survey; these data have established important distinctions among the tectonic provinces (Fig. 5). In Figure 5, depth to the M discontinuity is relative to sea-level datum and rounded off to whole kilometres. In round numbers, the crust is about 30 km thick in the Basin and Range province, 40 km thick in the Colorado Plateau, and 50 km thick in the western Great Plains. Low seismic velocities in the upper mantle (?„ <8.0) are observed in the Basin and Range province and the Colorado Plateau. Closest to the Rio Grande rift are the following refraction lines: (1) in the Colorado Plateau, Hanksville-Chinle (Roller, 1965) and Gasbuggy (Toppozada and Sanford, 1976; compare Warren and Jackson, 1968); (2) in the southern Rocky Mountains, Climax (Jackson and Pakiser, 1965) and unpublished data of C. Prodehl and L. C. Pakiser; and (3) in the High Plains, Lamar (Jackson and others, 1963) and Gnome (Stewart and Pakiser, 1962). Taken at face value, these indicate asymmetric crustal and upper-mantle structure across the rift between the High Plains and the Colorado Plateau. It is emphasized, however, that except for the Gasbuggy interpretation (i in Fig. 5), there are no refraction data over the rift itself. Interpretation of natural teleseismic events is essentially in agreement with the results from explosion seismology. Phinney (1964) identified by means of spectral analysis of long-period P waves intracrustal and M discontinuities at Albuquerque, although his range of depths to Moho (35 to 40 km) and range of ?„ velocity (7.4 to 8.4 km/s) are too large to resolve essential questions about deep structure within the rift. Bucher and Smith (1971) obtained depths to Moho of 32 km in the eastern Basin and Range province and 39 km in the western Colorado Plateau. They did not indicate an upper-mantle lid in the plateau (compare Archambeau and others, 1969), and they showed the low-velocity zone in the upper mantle to be about 80 km thick in both provinces. Layering within the upper mantle in the vicinity of the Rio Grande rift has not been described by induced-energy seismic studies, although Jackson and Pakiser (19t>5\ Warren (1969), Decker and others (1975), Bridwell (1976), and others along the lat 40°N parallel, is shown in Fig. have suggested configurations of the low- ure 6. Porath (1971) measured high electrivelocity zone determined from gravity data cal conductivity and inferred high temperaand isostatic considerations. ture within the upper mantle along this Most of the earlier seismic studies iden- same trend (as discussed below). Detailed tified a Conrad or other discontinuities refraction studies in Arizona by Warren within the crust (not shown in Fig. 5). Pro- (1969) show Basin and Range crust to be dehl (1970) reinterpreted these and other anomalously thin on the southwest edge of data in the western United States according the Colorado Plateau as well (Fig. 5). to a specialized inversion procedure and Detailed refraction data are not available suggested a low-velocity zone within the for the Rio Grande rift; however, prelimicrust rather than a Conrad discontinuity. nary results of a study of surface-wave disProdehl also depicted the M discontinuity persion data (Keller and others, 197fib; to be a zone 3 to 5 km thick in the Basin and G. R. Keller, 1977, oral commun.) indicate Range and as much as 10 km thick in the that the average crustal thickness within the Colorado Plateau. The crustal low-velocity rift is about 35 km. Anomalously low zones may be related to zones of low rigid- seismic velocities {Toppozada and Sanford, ity having possible tectonic significance in 1976) and other similarities between the rift areas of extensional faulting (Shurbet and and the Wasatch front, as discussed below, Cebull, 1971; compare Landisman and suggest that Figure 6, with the M disconothers, 1971). tinuity shifted down about 10 km, may Detailed seismic refraction data are provide a predictive model for the rift. available at the Basin and Range-Colorado Within the Rio Grande graben, recent Plateau boundary along the Wasatch front seismic and other investigations are focused in Utah and in central Arizona (Figs. 1, 5). on the possible occurrence of magma at Although these areas are distant from the shallow depth in the Socorro area. Sanford Rio Grande rift, their tectonic styles are and Long (1965) and Sanford and others similar, and it is worthwhile to consider the (1977) identified on microearthquake seisUtah and Arizona data in the light of a pos- mograms .S-phase to P-phase and S-phase to sible analogy with the rift. Keller and others S-phase reflections from a discontinuity (1975, 1976a) showed a mantle bulge (M within the crust. The ratio of the observed 24 km below sea level) and extremely low amplitudes of these phases, corrected for seismic compressional velocity (Pn = 7.4 to angles of incidence, were compared with 7.5 km/s) along the Wasatch front in Utah. theoretical ratios for several types of disA crustal profile across the western border continuities. The best match was obtained of the plateau at the Wasatch front, deter- for a discontinuity having solid rock undermined by projecting the seismic refraction lain by material of very low rigidity. By inmodels (Fig. 5) along strike onto a profile ference, this material could be considered to Wasatch Front WEST 116* Or EAST 110" 10 20 6.3 6.6 . 6.7 7.9 6.5 7.5 \6.9 7.5 6.8 401- J 100 KILOMETERS 7.9 Figure 6. Interpretive profile along lat 40°N across mantle bulge and low-velocity anomaly in both lower crust and upper mantle west of Wasatch front in Utah. Based on refraction data of Keller and others (1975) and other refraction studies shown in Figure 5 projected onto profile line. Numbers show compressional-wave velocities in crust and upper mantle; dashed line shows projected position of M discontinuity. ' : ! i i ! '• i REGIONAL GEOPHYSICAL SETTING OF THE RIO GRANDE RIFT molten. Cornpressional velocities indithat this interface is not the M discon" J t v The zone of low rigidity is estimated !l , e ' a bout 18 km deep at Socorro. It is ''I tifiable as far as 60 km north of " -orro, where it reaches a depth of about 30 km. The latter depth is tentative because wide-angle reflections were used, and these depend critically on an accurate knowledge of S-phase velocity (A. R. Sanford, 1976, oral commun). Repeat leveling data of Reilinger and Oliver (1976) indicate relative uplift of the 1081 Socorro area in the vicinity of Sanford and others' (1977) proposed shallow magma body. They reported 20 cm of vertical uplift in 40 yr, indicating an exceptionally high average relative velocity of 0.5 cm/yr. A network of deep seismic reflection "vibroseis" profiles (165 km) has been 300 KILOMETERS 102; *V" •X*iSf^^'-->,il1-1"J»>^P^ VA V~0*-';----'^^#tV- ."'•%&& I -if. -••••^^mi^^^m • -.-\\ -'•'&&^^*£-M ' !_J40' i f \--:--^m ^^ -.«>:•• •- . •xO-'^Jsfe l A ^>*-?: ^1?:[.: *•-'••£••?:•-?$&& I I'-?-' '"• ''•••'• ••••"^JF^Ws&bi *%$&'!&&&% ^' " r --tJ8' • ' .•/•^/•'^H^pw'c? /.' •' \i : fe—~~_^' --' -ipi^ppi' '?%&£-'••'••:; -^; 3 : f : I ® «*^ F-- . t ^^ pf:.!,••, **-> '-~^r*^-^-=--— jCai>i4A^' -i,rfy*/i«»fls?( v ^jarji*>»«-T-m-^-^^jaJ |;- -J.- ;/ "> •.^ :^-^.^ltgSlS ^i ; ; "f I >A^ " - T yi\^Jf^Mt^_LjM^ ' •*>-•". " :—^T • ^-=-{> V ' "'^ QK) ' m^ir-Kf- f • ~V '"'•" ' - A —' ^— 36' r r: i' ,V: •^•:;:;- . -.--v^ V^^;1.^^5(3feQ^| ; rr'^ ''^s^^£ ^ZSialiw®-^ S'^--^ ..,-! Figure 7. Heat flow. Data in New Mexico and Colorado are from Reiter and others (1975), published with permission of M. Reiter and Geological Society of America. Data in Arizona and Utah are from Diment and others (1975). Solid circle = >2.5 hfu; large dot = 2.0 to 2.5 hfu; small dot = 1.5 to -•0 hfu; open circle = <1.5 hfu. 1082 L. CORDELL completed recently in the Socorro area by the Consortium on Continental Reflection Profiling (COCORP). Preliminary results (Oliver and Kaufman, 1976; Kaufman and others, 1977) indicate reflections from as deep as 50 to 60 km, a zone of sparse reflections near the graben border, and differences in record character at the east bor- 38° Figure 8. Electrical conductivity zonation, probably within upper mantle, determined from geomagnetic variation studies. Dots show locations of recording arrays. Profile along lat 38°N is shown in Figure 9. Conductivity map after Gough (1974) and published with his permission and that of Journal of Geoelectricity and Geomagnetism. der suggestive of a major lateral disco tinuity. A strong reflection above an anotn lously homogeneous zone, observed Ove large areas within the graben, correlat well with the inferred magma body of San ford and others (1973, 1977). HEAT FLOW, ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, AND DEEP TEMPERATURE STRUCTURE Temperature within the lower crust and .ntie is panicuiany upper mantle particularly aitnc difficult to measure. iure. Near-surface heat flow would to provide the most direct information *,.. temperature at depth, although the heat-flow data are subject to relatively San Juan Vol. Reid West 4000 Sierran 'Front to E East Sangre de Cristo » Mountains Hurricane Fault Axis of symmetry \ UJ 1 ^3000 P «• i £2000 > iRocky Mountains' C l o r o d o Plateau "Rio Grande rift - High 1000 120° u 1 110° 115° ' ' ' ' 1 ' ' ' ' i 1 i i 105° | 1 1 1 £l pi, — 1 R: S(.' 40 </) . - 1 r 1 | 1 I 1 I OL 1UJ S o £ 1000 ohm meter i , ; 1 1 z CO ! •lr m ht 1 L ~l ' tiC.I - x~ Q. Ul ° ' J 2 ohm meter 80 1 ^ 1 120 — to » i s l' S^ C.I — 160 - rir: I 0 1 i 200 1 400 1 600 KILOMETERS | I lc ! H, 1 M Figure 9. Elevation profile and conductivity model (Porath, 1971, copyrighted by American Geophysical Union and published with permission) at Ui ' 38°N. Vertical exaggeration of elevation profile is about 150:1. Dashed line in lower part of figure shows top of a zone of anomalously high electrical conductivity. Although conductivity model is not unique, it does indicate high electrical conductivity and inferred high temperature (probably within upper | mantle) beneath Rio Grande rift and Wasatdi-Hurricane front. Heavy dashed line in top part of figure shows accordance of nonvolcanic summits with broad features of elevation profile. 1083 REGIONAL GEOPHYSICAL SETTING OF THE RIO GRANDE RIFT FiiJ'^)'. How-source contamination from radio• heat production and convective heat 1-1 isfer by moving ground water. Available i,r. it-flow data are shown in Figure 7. Most he data are from the remarkably com•hensive work of Reiter and others ' ig"'?). In general, very high heat flow is as, uted with the Rio Grande rift. Reduced J.,t-tlow values suggest that the heat-flow , , nli ilv along the rift is probably of magr itic and subcrustal origin, rather than ,'jjiogenic heat produced within the upper ' r l i s t (Decker and Smithson, 1975; M. Rei.. r unpub. reduced heat-flow data). The i, -jt-tlow anomaly is very likely associated •oth a corresponding high-temperature ,,,omaly at depth that is probably at least pliocene in age, considering the thermal difm-ivity, other thermal parameters, and the •cologic history. The existence of transverse • rends in the heat-flow data — as, for c\ nnple, along the Jemez lineament — is debatable. rlectrical conductivity measurements provide an indirect means of mapping deep •emperature structure because conductivity increases with increase in temperature. I mie variations in the Earth's magnetic Held induce electrical currents in conductive regions, which in turn generate secondary ;,ii.jl magnetic fields. Variations in the Fjrth's magnetic field measured with arrays ,if recording magnetometers provide local magnetic field component data from which conductivity and, by inference, deep temperature structure can be derived. In fact, g e o m a g n e t i c - v a r i a t i o n s t u d i e s were pioneered in this country in the southern Rio Grande rift by Schmucker (1964, 1970; x.r Weidelt, 1974, for an inversion of Schmucker's data in terms of highvonductivity distribution within the crust jnd upper mantle). The technique offers much promise, in conjunction with the heat-flow data, as a means of mapping deep Temperature structure within the rift. In this case it is the present temperature that is interred, inasmuch as the electromagnetic re>ponse is e f f e c t i v e l y i n s t a n t a n e o u s . Vhmucker's discovery of very high electri>M| conductivity associated with the rift in Miuthernmost New Mexico has been conHrmed in preliminary detailed studies by lowle and Fitterman (1975), Pedersen and Hermance (1976), and D. Bennett and M. Landisman (unpub. data). The results of reconnaissance geomagnetic-variation studies in the southwestern L'nited States are shown in Figure 8 (taken trom Porath, 1971, and Gough, 1974). Generally high conductivity is associated with the Basin and Range province. Belts of very high conductivity follow the southern Rocky Mountains-Rio Grande rift and Wasatch-Hurricane front along the east edge of the Great Basin. Station spacing (about 100 km) is too wide to determine source depths. The Wasatch front and Rocky Mountain anomalies seem to die out at about lat 43°N. A conductivity distribution in the upper 160 km compatible with the data (after Porath, 1971) is shown along lat 38°N in Figure 9 (lower pan). The solution is not unique, and a conductivity interface could be shifted downward to considerable depth. Porath (1971) and Gough (1974) discussed independent temporal, geoelectrical, and tectonic considerations indicating that the highly conductive sources occur in the upper mantle, as shown. They suggested that the seismic and conductivity data, therefore, be considered together to reflect partial melting within the low-velocity zone in the upper mantle. Very shallow-source effects related to zones of hydrothermal alteration could make a significant contribution locally to the conductivity anomalies; this has not been taken into account (W. D. Stanley, unpub. data). It is unlikely, however, that the regional data could be satisfied by means of reasonable conductivity anomalies within the upper crust or the sedimentary cover alone. It seems more likely that a zone of high electrical conductivity, and, by inference, anomalously high temperature, having considerable width and depth extent exists within the lower crust and upper mantle under both the Rio Grande rift and the Wasatch front. | t ! <fe ir',!?.«« If, -100 ,— «• -ZOO i, -300 4000 - 360O - 2400 - 2000 800 III' 110* 103' 108* 107' 106* 105' 104' 103' 102' Figure 10. Gravity and elevation profiles along lat 37°N (Colorado-^Jew Mexico border). Dashed segment of gravity profile shows, schematically, residual broad positive anomaly upon which gravity low associated with graben fill is superimposed. 1084 L. CORDELL TOPOGRAPHIC AND GRAVITY PROFILES ACROSS THE RIFT ben (compare Fig. 2) is a narrow cleft in the velocities in the crust and upper mantle vault of the southern Rocky Mountains up- (Fig. 6), uplift, high seismicity, relatively lift. The vault in the Great Basin seemingly high heat flow, high electrical conductivity Elevation provides a crude structural has collapsed. In terms of the four major and an anomalously thin crust. Conductivdatum, and its broader components repre- physiographic subdivisions discussed in ity data of Schmucker (1970) and prelimisent a systematic response to integrated connection with Figure 1, the plains sub- nary results from studies now in progress density and rheological effects in the crust division represents the stable craton; the (W. Isherwood, 1976, oral commun.) indiand upper mantle. East-west profiles across mountains with flanking dissected table- cate similarly very anomalous conditions the Rio Grande rift at intervals of 1° of lands represent incipient rifting as seen in along the Sierran front. Thus, the principal latitude (about 115 km) are shown in Fig- the Rocky Mountains in the northern pan geophysical and topographic anomalies of ures 9 through 15. In Figure 9 the profile at of the Rio Grande rift and at the edges of the Great Basin occur at its edges. If the lat 38°N is extended westward across the the Great Basin; and the mountains-in Basin and Range (mountains-in-plains) Great Basin to the Sierran front so that the plains subdivision represents the climax physiography grew outward from a onceGreat Basin and the Rio Grande rift can be state as seen within the Great Basin itself. narrower and geophysically anomalous compared. Interestingly, the mountains, rather than axial uplift, such as is now seen in the All ramifications of the Atwater (1970) the mountains-in-plains, are the more southern Rocky Mountains, the anomalous hypothesis require large Cenozoic extension anomalous geophysically. Geophysical data conditions at the center may have been rewithin the North American Cordillera. are most complete along the Hurricane- lieved, in part, by collapse and extension of Hundreds of kilometres of extension were Wasatch front, where we observe, relative the vault itself. established beforehand by Hamilton and to both the Great Basin on the west and the Reference to "collapse" is misleading beMyers in 1966. Hamilton (1969) described Colorado Plateau on the east, the following cause of the extreme vertical exaggeration a system in which everything west of the characteristics: anomalously low seismic on the profile. Although both horizontal southern Rocky Mountain front moved under inertial body forces northwestward relative to the craton. In this system rifts, such as the Rio Grande, represent secondary effects formed where coherent blocks, such as the High Plains and the Colorado Plateau, "pulled apart." Alternatively, mechanisms such as back- 1 -20° arc spreading (Scholz and others, 1971) involve vertically directed magmatic forces, rather than horizontal body forces, as a first cause. Eaton and others (1976) "showed the Great Basin to be bilaterally symmetrical about a north-trending axis (Fig. 9) and -300 suggested that the causal mechanism is rooted to this axis at depth. Their suggestion of symmetric "spreading" east and west from the center of the Great Basin 4400 i— raises a question as to which direction the Colorado Plateau was "pulled." 4000 In the profile across the Great Basin and Dolhorl Rio Grande rifts shown in Figure 9, neither 3600 Ierosion nor constructional volcanic features obscure the general accordancy of summits along the simple double bulge shown by the dashed line. Eaton and others' (1976) axis 2800 of symmetry within^the Great Basin trends roughly normal to the profile at about long 115° to 116°W. From this perspective it becomes difficult to visualize the Rio Grande > 2OOO rift as a "pull apart" foundered in the wake uj_j of the westward-drifting Colorado Plateau. uj 1600 Rather, the plateau looks like a "pushed aside," lying between two great rifts. The 1200 100 200 KILOMETERS:: Rio Grande and the Great Basin are parallel, consanguineous, yet separate structures 800 showing different stages of the extensional J_ J_ J_ J_ J_ J_ _L _L Ml' 110* 109' 108' 107* 106' 105' 104' 103' 102' process developed over about the same time span. At this latitude the Rio Grande graFigure 11. Gravity and elevation profiles along lat 36°N (Jemez Mountains). _L 1085 REGIONAL GEOPHYSICAL SETTING OF THE RIO GRANDE RIFT ' rtcal movement contributed to the physiography, and tal movement is the greater by an "'i'.Vof magnitude, there is no structural " l - n c c showing which occurred first. 'U|L limatic and pollen data of Axelrod ' g-V) and Axelrod and Bailey (1976) indiibout 1.200 m of epeiric uplift of the '.''.'I Grande rift after 15 m.y. B.P. — that is, V-r the initiation of extensional faulting, ' -fit-ably before the culmination of exi's'ional faulting during Pliocene time, but f<: probably contemporaneous with it. •i-n/ir pollen data seem to indicate Oligo",,f uplift in southern New Mexico, in this case they attribute highflora to constructional volcanic tov rather than to uplift. h«ure 9 does not establish that the ,nihern Rocky Mountains-Rio Grande ,.([ ind the Great Basin represent different •-! ices in the rift process." This idea is . IM.-J on l^e observation that the Rio , , r i n J e rift progresses southward from ..,,untains into mountains-in-plains, which , illustrated with a series of profiles in Fig.r^ 10 through 15. The progression may v niore in the domain of intensity than in me. as there is at present no evidence of 1^1- progression along the rift. The profile along the Colorado-New Mexico state border at lat 37°N (Fig. 10) is •^fntially free of constructional volcanic • ( ,pography and characterizes the southern Rocky Mountain section of the rift more ipily than Figure 9. The principal mass flux * .is upward, comprising a horst 100 to 150 v m wide having at least 3 km of structural -i-licf (on the Precambrian basement) superinposeJ on a sinusoidal bulge several hunircJs of kilometres wide. Part of the struc•ural relief on the Precambrian basement is 1 jramide in age (Woodward, 1976). Topographic relief, by contrast, was developed m the late Eocene peneplane and indicates •oughly the minimum amount of postI aramide, primarily Neogene, uplift. Struc•ural relief in the narrow Rio Grande grax-n, lying near the center of the axial valley, > .ilso about 3 to 4 km on its eastern side. If ie faults dip uniformly 63°, the component i horizontal extension would be equal to •he sum of the structural relief of all the 'ursts and grabens, say, about 6 to 8 km. ihis represents a minimum amount of ex'cnsion, because some of the fault blocks •K covered and the fault planes probably 'atten with depth (Moore, 1960; Woodward and DuChene, 1975; Woodward, . Thus, in the southernmost Colorado n of the rift, horizontal extension is -loo ,— n 1200 100 800 III' 110* 109* 108' 200 KILOMETERS i i t _L 107' 106* 105' !04« 103' 102' Figure 12. Gravity and elevation profiles along lat 3S°N (Albuquerque). -100 i -200 o 03 -300 Magdaleno Mts I Rio Grande (Socorro) 3200 Mogollon Rim San Agustin Plains Los Prnos Mts Pecos River t 2800 s z2000 p 1600 § UJ d |2°o 800 j_ J_ III MO* 109* 108* 107* 106* _L 105* i 104* Figure 13. Gravity and elevation profiles along lat 34°N (Socorro). 103* I02« 1086 greater, but probably not an order of magnitude greater, than vertical uplift. A similar 140-km-wide basement-cored horst containing an axial graben is also observed in the lat 36°N profile (Fig. 11). First stages in major extension and collapse of the uplifted vault are apparent in Figure 12. The western shoulder of the rift occurs as far west as long 108°W along the northeast-trending Jemez lineament (Fig. 1). The Rio Puerco antithetic fault zone probably represents a 100-km-wide zone of late Neogene extension. Mesozoic rocks are not eroded in the Rio Puerco zone nor within the graben at Albuquerque (Black and Hiss, 1974), as they would be had the area been uplifted. To judge from regional tectonic and magmatic patterns, however, the Rio Puerco zone is obviously part of the rift. (Evidence for a possible Laramide ancestory is discussed by Slack, 1975.) Mesozoic rocks may have been preserved in this area because accelerated horizontal extension didn't allow much vertical uplift to develop. North of lat 35°N (Fig. 12), the rift crosses a suspected northeast-trending discontinuity in the Precambrian basement (Jemez lineament) or perhaps a series of parallel northeast-trending discontinuities. It is in this general area that the rift changes trend and character and horizontal extension increases significantly (Fig. 12). Profiles at lat 34° 33° and 32°N are shown in Figures 13 through 15. West of about long 108°W the profiles cross the structural grain at small angles (Fig. 2) and are probably misleading. The eastern border of the rift, however, is fairly well depicted by the profiles. The eastern border extends along the Sacramento-Guadalupe Mountains (Fig. 1), across Trans-Pecos Texas, and into the Republic of Mexico. The location of the western and southern borders is arbitrary. Figures 13 through 15 show a general progression into the "mountains-in-plains" physiography typical of the Great Basin (compare Figs. 9 and 15). Even though the exact number of horsts and grabens is not known, it is likely that by lat 32°N (Fig. 15), horizontal extension is more than an order of magnitude greater than uplift. The topographic profiles show the rift zone to be essentially either a horst or a broad uplift, which from Colorado southward sags in the center as it increases in width. Bouguer gravity profiles (Figs. 10 through 15) show a reciprocal but essentially similar north-to-south progression. L. CORDELL Neglecting the narrow gravity low associated with graben fill, one observes a residual positive gravity anomaly over the axial graben (dashed line in Figs. 10 through 12), and a broad residual negative anomaly over the regional uplift. Amplitudes of both residual anomalies would be significantly increased if near-surface density variations were taken into account (compare Decker and others, 1975). Gravity profiles across the Rio Grande rift resemble profiles across the Gregory rift in Kenya (Searle, 1970), which Girdler (1975; Girdler and others, 1969) interpreted in terms of thinning of the lithosphere over an asthenospheric bulge. Similarly, from gravity analysis with seismic and heat flow constraints, Bridwell (1976) suggested a 60-km-thick "intrusion" of asthenosphere beneath the Rio Grande rift in northern New Mexico, and Decker and Smithson (1975) suggested thinning of the crust by 75% to 100% over a 30- to 60km-thick sill of "low-density mantle." To the extent that within interpretational latitude the low-density mantle extends nearly to the base of the lithosphere, these two interpretations for the Rio Grande rift are somewhat the same. They have in common with each other and with Girdler and others' (1969) model for Kenya a very great thickness of inferred low-density, asthenosphere-like upper mantle. In pan, the resulting very great thickness of anomalous upper mantle is built into these analyses because only steady-state, conductive heat transfer is considered. More recently, Decker and Smithson (1977) have considered transient heat sources (analogous to convective, magmatic heat transport) leading to a significantly thinner anomalous zone. -100 o CD -300 Rio Grande 3200i— 110" 109° I08« I07« 106° 105° I04« 103* Figure 14. Gravity and elevation profiles along lat,33°N (Jornada syndine). 102° REGIONAL GEOPHYSICAL SETTING OF THE RIO GRANDE RIFT The broad gravity low may be related to s hape of the low-velocity zone in the ' p,.r mantle, but it may be more critically |jted to density changes due to thermal x pansion and mass transport within the pner mantle (see Fig. 6) and to both inhernt jnd intrusion-related lateral density var,j ( ion within the crust. High heat flow and high electrical conductivity indicate that the , w.velocity zone is hot, but its shape, in•crnjl density structure, and convective .,,otion are unknown. One can guess at the i c nsity and invert the gravity data in terms ,,i the shape of the low-velocity zone, but as ^.jre seismic and electrical data become jvjilable it might become possible to const'jin the shape and invert the gravity data in •erms of the density distribution within the low-velocity zone. The residual positive gravity anomaly aswK-iaced with the axial graben is apparent in Kifures 10 and 11 in the vicinity of long ;i)fT\V and is very obvious in Figure 12. I hjve attempted to illustrate the anomaly by interpolating the gravity field over the jbrupt local gravity low associated with ;,iw-density graben fill, as shown by dashed mes in Figures 10, 11, and 12. An axial positive gravity anomaly within a broad gravity low is also characteristic of the drcgory rift and other continental rifts. Model studies (Searle, 1970; Girdler, 1975; lordell, 1976a; Bridwell, 1976) indicate , the source of the axial positive anomaly to be narrow and steep sided. This shape seems inconsistent with freeboard topography on a buoyantly supported asthenolith. It seems more likely that the axial positive gravity anomaly indicates mantle material decoupled from the underlying anomalous upper mantle and intruded by dynamic means into the crust. DISCUSSION The southern Rocky Mountain uplift (the Neogene-Quaternary uplift) and the Rio Grande graben cannot be considered separately. They are parts of a system of uplift, magmatism, and extension that makes up the Rio Grande rift. Among the continental rifts, a unique feature of the Rio Grande rift is its vergence, providing from south to north a son of down-structure view of the rift process initiated as mountains and culminating as mountains-in-plains. The geophysical data show that heat and mass have been added to the system, as is the case with spreading ridges. On the other hand, the relatively low level of seismicity would indicate that the rift is not very active at present. The low seismicity may not be representative of long-term trends, however, to judge from the evidence provided by seismology and electrical conductivity data for existing major deep structure. De- 1087 tailed seismic data are sparse within the rift itself, except in the Socorro area. The rift seems to occur in the general area of a lateral transition in crustal and upper-mantle structure between the High Plains and the Colorado Plateau. As Figure 9 suggests, however, the plateau may have no particularly characteristic crustal structure in its own right, the more significant Neogene structure possibly being symmetric to the axis of the rift. Zigzags in the fault blocks on the order of tens of kilometres, as well as zigzags in the trend of the rift itself on the order of hundreds of kilometres, are aligned with basement structural grain, as traced under sedimentary cover by means of the aeromagnetic data. Inherited structural grain has undoubtedly influenced both the rift and earlier uplifts along this same trend. Whether the rift has sought out a fundamental basement suture or has simply taken advantage of ubiquitous basement cracks is uncertain. The tectonic work has been accomplished by some combination of the effects of heat, density, chemical phase change, and mass transport, all of which are interrelated. Similarly, the geophysical data — gravity, heat flow, seismic velocity, electrical conductivity, and elevation — are functionally interrelated. The system is overdetermined and, in principle, could be solved uniquely. To do so realistically would require more constraints on the geometry of deep structure within the rift itself; that is, physicalproperty i n f o r m a t i o n derived from potential-field data is reasonably complete, but sounding-type geophysical data that could provide constraints on shape and depth of critical interfaces are needed. When that information becomes available, the study of the rift will enter an exciting new phase in which the geophysical and petrological data and the geological history can be quantitatively combined. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 110' 109* 108' • 107' 106' 105* 104' Figure IS. Gravity and elevation profiles along lat 32°N (El Paso). 103' 102* For access to unpublished data and their interpretation I am grateful to G. O. Bachman, C. E. Chapin, G. P. Eaton, W. Hamilton, W. F. Isherwood, G. R. Keller, M. Landisman, M. N. Machette, J. E. Oliver, L. C. Pakiser, M. Reiter, A. R. Sanford, L. T. Silver, and W. D. Stanley. For criticism of the first draft of the manuscript I thank R. J. Bridwell, C. E. Chapin, G. P. Eaton, W. Hamilton, G. R. Keller, A. R. 1088 Sanford, and W. D. Stanley. I am grateful to many colleagues for their long-standing assistance and good will. REFERENCES CITED Archambeau, C. B., Flinn, E. A., and Lambert, D. G., 1969, Fine structure of the upper mantle: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 74, p. 5825-5865. Atwater, Tanya, 1970, Implications of plate tectonics for the Cenozoic tectonic evolution of western North America: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 81, p. 35133536. Axelrod, D. I., 1975, Tertiary floras from the Rio Grande rift: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 26th Field Conference, Las Cruces Country, p. 85-88. Axelrod, D. I., and Bailey, H. P., 1976, Tertiary vegetation, climate, and altitude of the Rio Grande depression, New Mexico-Colorado: Paleobiology, v. 2, p. 235-254. Black, B. A., and Hiss, W. L, 1974, Structure and stratigraphy in the vicinity of the Shell Oil Co. Santa Fe Pacific No. 1 test well, southern Sandoval County, New Mexico: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 25th Field Conference, Ghost Ranch, central-northern New Mexico, p. 365 — 370. Braile, L. W., Smith, R. B., Keller, G. R., Welch, R. M., and Meyer, R. P., 1974, Crustal structure across the Wasatch front from detailed seismic refraction studies: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 79, p. 26692677. Bridwell, R. J., 1976, Lithospheric thinning and the late Cenozoic thermal and tectonic regime of the northern Rio Grande rift: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 27th Field Conference, Vermejo Park, p. 283-292. Bucher, R. L, and Smith, R. B., 1971, Crustal structure of the eastern Basin and Range province and the northern Colorado Plateau from phase velocities of Rayleigh waves, in Heacock, J. G., ed., The structure and physical properties of the earth's crust: American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph 14, p. 57-70. Chapin, C. E., and Seager, W. R., 1975, Evolution of the Rio Grande rift in the Socorro and Las Cruces areas: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 26th Field Conference, Las Cruces Country, p. 297—321. Christiansen, R. L., and Lipman, P. W., 1972, Cenozoic volcanism and-.plate tectonic evolution of western United States. II. Late Cenozoic: Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions, ser. A., v. 272, p. 249-284. Cordell, Lindrith, 1970, Gravity and aeromagnetic investigations of Rio Grande depression in northern New Mexico [abs.]: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 21st Field Conference, p. 158. 1972, Complete Bouguer anomaly gravity map of the Jemez area, New Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Map, scale 1:250,000. L. CORDELL 1976a, Aeromagnetic and gravity studies of the Rio Grande graben in New Mexico between Belen and Pilar, in Woodward, L. A., and Northrop, S.A., eds., Tectonics and mineral resources of southwestern North America — A volume honoring Vincent C. Kelley: New Mexico Geological Society Special Publication 6, p. 62-70. 1976b, Preliminary complete Bouguer anomaly gravity map of the Taos basin section of the Rio Grande graben: U.S. Geological S u r v e y Open-File Map, scale 1:250,000. Cordell, Lindrith, Joesting, H. R., and Case, J. E., 1973, Complete Bouguer anomaly gravity map of the Albuquerque-Grants area, New Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Map, scale 1:250,000. Dane, G. H., and Bachman, G. O., 1965, Geologic map of New Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey, scale 1:500,000. Decker, E. R., and Smithson, S. B., 1975, Heat flow and gravity interpretation across the Rio Grande rift in southern New Mexico and west Texas: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 80, p. 2542-2552. 1977, Review of the significance of geothermal and gravity studies in the southern Rio Grande rift: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 9, p. 15. Decker, E. R., Cook, F. A., Ramberg, I. B., and Smithson, S. B., 1975, Significance of geothermal and gravity studies in the Las Cruces area: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 26th Field Conference, Las Cruces Country, p. 251-259. Diment, W. H., Urban, T. C., Sass, J. H., Marshall, B. V., Munroe, R. J., and Lachenbruch, A. H., 1975, Temperatures and heat contents based on conductive transport of heat, in White, D. F., and Williams, D. L., eds., Assessment of geothermal resources of the United States— 1975: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 726, p. 84-103. Eaton, G. P., Prostka, H. J., Oriel, S. S., and Pierce, K. L., 1976, Cordilleran thermotectonic anomaly: I. Geophysical and geological evidence of coherent late Cenozoic intraplate magmatism and deformation: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 8, p. 850. Elston, W. E., 1976, Tectonic significance of mid-Tertiary volcanism in the Basin and Range province: A critical review with special reference to New Mexico, in Elston, W. E., and Northrop, S. A., eds., Cenozoic Volcanism in southwestern New Mexico: New Mexico Geological Society Special Publication 5, p. 93-102. Elston, W. E. Damon, P. E., Coney, P. T., Rhodes, R. C., Smith, E. L, and Bikerman, Michael, 1973, Tertiary volcanic rocks, Mogollon-Datil province, New Mexico, and surrounding region: K-Ar dates, patterns of eruptions and periods of mineralization: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 85, p. 2259-2274. Elston, W. E., Rhodes, R. C., Coney, P. J., and Deal, E. G., 1976, Progress report on the Mogollon Plateau volcanic field, southwestern New Mexico . 3. surface expression of a pluton, in Elston, W. E., and S. A., eds., Cenozoic volcanism. in western New Mexico: New Geological Society Special 1 3-26. Epis, R. C., and Chapin, C. E., 1975, phic and tectonic implications of the" Laramide, Late Eocene erosion sari ' the southern Rocky Mountains, in , B. M., ed., Cenozoic history of tt Rocky Mountains: Geological America Memoir 144, p. 45—74 Fairhead, J. D., and Girdler, R. W., 197j -., seismicity of Africa: Royal Astronolnioi Society Geophysical Journal, v 24 Z7U r»t 301. ' Girdler, R. W., 1975, The gn gravity anomaly over Africa: Geophysical Union Transactions y Jt, p. 516-519. ' *' Girdler, R. W.,Fairhead, J. D., Searle,R.r ,-, Sowerburts, W.T.C., 1969, The evol^: of rifting in Africa: Nature, v 254 p. 1178-1182. ' '• Gough, D. I., 1974, Electrical conductivity un^ western North America in relation to heai flow, seismology, and structure: Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, v 5* p. 105-123. ' ' Hamilton, Warren, 1969, Mesozoic California and the underflow of Pacific mantle Geological Society of America Bulletin! v. 80, p. 2409-2430. Hamilton, Warren, and Myers, W. B., 19$$ Cenozoic tectonics of the western United' States: Reviews of Geophysics, v 4 p. 509-549. Hammond, E. H., 1964, Analysis of propertiej in land form geography: An application to broad-scale land form mapping (with accompanying map): Classes of land-surfacr form in the forty-eight states, U.S.A. (map supplement no. 4): Association of American Geographers Annals, v. 54, p. 11-19. Hill, D. P., and Pakiser, L. C, 1967, Seismic refraction study of crustal structure between the Nevada test site and Boise, Idaho: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 78, p. 685-704. Howard, J. D., 1966, Patterns of sediment div persal in the Fountain Formation of Colorado: Mountain Geologist, v. 3, p. 147153. Jackson, W. H., and Pakiser, L. C., 1965, Seismic study of crustal structure in the southern Rocky Mountains: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 525-D, p. D85-D92. Jackson, W. H., Stewart, S. W., and Pakistr, L. C., 1963, Crustal structure in eastern Colorado from seismic-refraction measurements: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 68, p. 5767-5776. Joesting, H. R., Case, J. E., and Cordell, Lindrith, 1961, The Rio Grande trough near Albuquerque, New Mexico: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 12th FieU Conference, A l b u q u e r q u e Country, p. 148-150. Kaufman, S., Brown, L. D., and Oliver, J., 1977. Deep structure of die Rio Grande rift from seismic reflection profiling: American Geophysical Union Transactions, v. 58, I.JIK LJU Lee. Lip- LIP REGIONAL GEOPHYSICAL SETTING OF THE RIO GRANDE RIFT ci4_535. G R-. Smith' R" B" and Braile' L W'' i'o75 Crustal structure along the Great „ jjpLcolorado Plateau transition from <mic refraction studies: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 80, p. 1093P *~l "G8'R.. Braile- L" W" and Lowr>'' W' S '> "i'i)"6a. Regional crustal struaure of the Rio Grande rift and adjacent areas: Geological <., -,etv of America Abstracts with Pro* a m s ; V .8, P .951. „ rC R Smith, R. B., Braile, L. W., Heaney, R.. and Shurbet, D. H., 1976b, Upper crus[jl'structure of the eastern Basin and Range, northern Colorado Plateau, and middle Rocky Mountains from Rayleigh-wave dispersion: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v. 66, p. 869-876. Chi-Yu, and Knopoff, Leon, 1968, Stress Jrop in earthquakes: Seismological Society ot America Bulletin, v. 58, p. 249-257. nYinkopf, M- D., Peterson, D. L., and Johnson, R. B., 1970, Reconnaissance geophysical studies of the Trinidad quadrangle, southcentral Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 700-B, p. B78-B85. KuJo A. M., 1976, Volcanism within the Rio Grande rift: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 8, p. 597. KuJo. A. M., Aoki, Ken-Ichiro, and Brookins, D. G., 1971, The origin of PlioceneHolocene basalts of New Mexico in the light of strontium-isotopic and majorclement abundances: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 13, p. 200-204. I j m b e r t , P. W., 1966, Notes on the late Cenozoic geology of the Taos-Questa area, New Mexico: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 17th Field Conference, Taos-Ranton-Spanish Peaks Country, New Mexico, p. 43-50. I jnJisman, M., Mueller, S., and Mitchell, B. J., 1971, Physical properties of the continental crust, in Heacock, J. G., ed., The struaure and physical properties of the earth's crust: American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph 14, p. 11-34. I jughlin, A. W., Brookins, D. G., and Causey, J. D., 1972, Late Cenozoic basalts from the Bandera lava field, Valencia County, New Mexico: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 83, p. 1543-1552. In-, W. T., 1907, Water resources of the Rio Grande Valley in New Mexico and their development: U.S. Geological Survey WaterSupply Paper 188, 59 p. :ipman, P. W., 1969, Alkalic and tholeiitic basalt volcanism related to the Rio G*ande depression, southern Colorado and northern New Mexico: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 80, p. 1341-1354. : Jfman, P. W., and Mehnert, H. H., 1975, Late Cenozoic basaltic volcanism and the development of the Rio Grande depression in the southern Rocky Mountains, in Curtis, B. M., ed., Cenozoic history of the southern Rocky Mountains: Geological Society of America Memoir 144, p. 119-154. '• -pman, P. W., Prostka, H. J., and Christiansen, R. L., 1972, Cenozoic volcanism and plate tectonic evolution of the western United k{ •1 States. I. Early and middle Cenozoic: Royal Society of London Philosphical Transactions, ser. A, v. 271, p. 217-248. Machette, M. N., 1976, Timing and amounts of recurrent fault displacements near Albuquerque, New Mexico: An example of applied quantitative pedology and Quaternary stratigraphy: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 8, p. 605-606. Moore, J. G., 1960, Curvature of normal faults in the Basin and Range province of the western United States: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 400-B, p. B409B411. Northrop, S. A., 1976, New Mexico's earthquake history, 1849-1975, in Woodward, L. A., and Northrop, S. A., eds., Tectonics and mineral resources of southwestern North America — A volume honoring Vincent C. Kelley: New Mexico Geological Society Special Publication 6, p. 77-87. Oliver, Jack, and Kaufman, Sidney, 1976, Profiling the Rio Grande rift: Geotimes, v. 27, no. 7, p. 20-23. Olsen, K. H., Cash, D. J., and Bridwell, R. J., 1976, Seismicity of north-central New Mexico and its relationship to contemporary tectonics: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 8, p. 615-616. Pakiser, L. C., 1963, Struaure of the crust and upper mantle in the western United States: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 68, p. 5747-5756. Pedersen, Jens, and Hermance, J. F., 1976, Towards resolving the absence or presence of an aaive magma chamber under the southern Rio Grande rift zone [abs.]: American Geophysical Union Transaaions, v. 57, p. 1014. Phinney, R. A., 1964, Struaure of the earth's crust from spectral behavior of long-period body waves: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 69, p. 2997-3017. Plouff, Donald, and Pakiser, L. C., 1972, Gravity study of the San Juan Mountains, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 800-B, p. B183-B190. Porath, H., 1971, Magnetic variation anomalies and seismic low-velocity zone in the western United States: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 76, p. 2643-2648. Prodehl, Claus, 1970, Seismic refraaion study of crustal structure in the western United States: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 81, p. 2629-2646. Ramberg, I. B., and Smithson, S. B., 1975, Gridded fault patterns in a late Cenozoic and Paleozoic continental rift: Geology, v. 3, p. 201-205. Reilinger, Robert, and Oliver, Jack, 1976, Modern uplift associated with a proposed magma body in the vicinity of Socorro, New Mexico: Geology, v. 4, p. 583-586. Reiter, M., Edwards, C. L., Hartman, H., and Weidman, C., 1975, Terrestrial heat flow along the Rio Grande rift, New Mexico and southern Colorado: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 86, p. 811-818. Roller, J. C., 1965, Crustal struaure in the eastern Colorado Plateaus province from seismic-refraction measurements: Seis- mological Society of America Bulletin, v. 55, p. 107-119. Ryall, Alan, and Stuart, D. J., 1963, Travel times and amplitudes from nuclear explosions, Nevada test site to Ordway, Colorado: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 68, p. 5821-5835. Sanford, A. R., 1968, Gravity survey in central Socorro County, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Circular 91, 14 p. Sanford, A. R., and Long, L. T., 1965, Microearthquake crustal refleaions, Socorro, New Mexico: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v. 55, p. 579-586. Sanford, A. R., Budding, A. J., Hoffman, J. P., Alptekin, O. S., Rush, C. A., and Toppozada, T. R., 1972, Seismicity of the Rio Grande rift in New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Circular 120, 19 p. Sanford, A. R., Alptekin, O. S., and Toppozada, T. R., 1973, Use of refleaion phases on microearthquake seismograms to map an unusual discontinuity beneath the Rio Grande rift: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v. 63, p. 2021-2034. Sanford, A. R., Toppozada, T. R., Ward, R. M., and Wallace, T. C., 1976, The Seismicity of New Mexico: 1962 through 1972: Geological Society of America Abstraas with Programs, v. 8, p. 625-626. Sanford, A. R., Mott, R. P., Jr., Shuleski, P. J., Rinehart, E. J., Caravella, F. J., Ward, R. M., and Wallace, T. C., 1977, Geophysical evidence for a magma body in the crust in the vicinity of Socorro, New Mexico, in The earth's crust — Its nature and physical properties: American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph 20, p. 385—403. Sauck, W. A., and Sumner, J. S., 1970, Residual aeromagnetic map of Arizona: Tucson, University of Arizona, Department of Geosciences, scale 1:1,000,000. Schmucker, Ulrich, 1964, Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the southwestern United States: Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelearicity, v. 15, p. 193-221. 1970, Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the southwestern United States: Scripps Institution of Oceanography Bulletin, v. 13, 165 p. Scholz, C. H., Barazangi, Muawia, and Sbar, M. L., 1971, Late Cenozoic evolution of the Great Basin, western United States, as an ensialic interarc basin: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 82, p. 2979-2990. Scott, G. R., 1975, Cenozoic surfaces and deposits in the southern Rocky Mountains in Curtis, B. M., ed., Cenozoic history of the southern Rocky Mountains: Geological Society of America Memoir 144, p. 227248. Seager, W. R., 1975, Cenozoic teaonic evolution of the Las Cruces area, New Mexico: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 26th Field Conference, Las Cruces Country, p. 241-250. Searle, R. C., 1970, Evidence from gravity anomalies for thinning of the lithosphere beneath the rift valley in Kenya: Royal Astronomical Society Geophysical Journal, 1090 L. CORDELL v. 21, p. 13-31. Shurbet, D. H., and Cebull, S. E., 1971, Crustal low-velocity layer and regional extension in Basin and Range province: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v 82, p. 32413244. Slack, P. B., 1975, Tectonic development of the northeast part of the Rio Puerco fault zone, New Mexico: Geology, v. 3, p. 665—668. Smith, R. B., and Sbar, M. L, 1974, Contemporary tectonics and seismicity of the western United States with emphasis on the intermountain seismic belt: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 85, p. 1205-1218. Solonenko, V. P., ed., 1968, Seismotectonics and seismicity of the Baikal rift system: Moscow, Nauka, 217 p. (in Russian), with maps. Steven, T. A., 1975, Middle Tertiary volcanic field in the southern Rocky Mountains, in Curtis, B. M., ed. Cenozoic history of the southern Rocky Mountains: Geological Society of America Memoir 144, p. 75-94. Stewart, S. W., and Pakiser, L. C, 1962, Crustal structure in eastern New Mexico interpreted from the Gnome explosion: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v. 52, p. 1017-1030. Taylor, R. B., 1975, Neogene tectonism in south-central Colorado, in Curtis, B. M., ed., Cenozoic history of the southern Rocky Mountains: Geological Society of America Memoir 144, p. 75-94. Toppozada, T.M.R., 1974, Seismic investigation of crustal structure and upper mantle velocity in the State of New Mexico and vicinity: Socorro, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Dissertation, 152 p. Toppozada, T.M.R., and Sanford, A. R., 1976, Crustal structure in central New Mexico interpreted from the Gasbuggy explosion: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v. 66, p. 877-886. Towle, J. N., and Fitterman, D. V., 1975, Geomagnetic variations at Kilbourne Hole, New Mexico: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 26th Field Conference, Las Cruces Country, p. 281. Tweto, Ogden, 1975, L a r a m i d e ( L a t e Cretaceous—early Tertiary) orogeny in the southern Rocky Mountains, in Curtis, B. M., ed., Cenozoic history of the southern Rocky Mountains: Geological Society of America Memoir 144, p. 1—44. Warren, D. H., 1969, A seismic-refraction survey of crustal structure in central Arizona: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 80, p. 257-282. Warren, D. H., and Jackson, W. H., 1968, Surface seismic measurements of the project Gasbuggy explosion at intermediate distance ranges: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 45 p. Weidelt, P., 1974, Inversion of two-dimensional structures, in Proceedings of second workshop on electromagnetic induction in the Earth: Ottawa, Canada, Canada Depart- ment of Energy, Mines and Resources p. Rlb-l-Rlb-16. ' Wohlenberg, Jiirgen, 1975, sc, Aspekte der ostafrikanishen GrabenzonenGeologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe E v 4 p. 1-82. Woodward, L. A., 1976, Laramide deformation of Rocky Mountain foreland: Geometry and mechanics, in Woodward, L. A., and Northrup, S. A., eds., Tectonics and mineral resources of southwestern North AmericaNew Mexico Geological Society Special Publication 6, p. 11-17. - 1977, Rate of crustal extension across the Rio Grande rift near Albuquerque, New Mexico: Geology, v. 5, p. 269-272. Woodward, L. A., and DuChene, H. R., 1975 Geometry of the Sierrita fault and its bearing on tectonic development of the Rio Grande rift: Geology, v. 3, p. 114-116. Woodward, L. A., Callender, J. F., and Zilinski R. E., 1975, Tectonic map of the Ri0 Grande rift, New Mexico: Geological Society of America Map and Chart Series MC-11. Zietz, Isidore, and Kirby, J. R., 1972, Aeromagnetic map of Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Geophysical Investigations Map GP-880, scale 1:1,000,000. MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED BY THE SOCIETY JANUARY 4, 1977 REVISED MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED JULY 6, 1977 MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED AUGUST 9, 1977 Printed in U.S A