Download Factors Associated with HIV Viral Load Suppression among

Factors Associated with HIV Viral Load
Suppression among HIV-positive Adults
in Care in Washington State in 2009
Council of State and Territorial
Epidemiologists Annual Conference
June 4, 2012
Omaha, Nebraska
Tom Jaenicke, MPH, MBA, MES
Washington State Department of Health
[email protected]
Outline for today
• Overview of the Medical Monitoring
Project (MMP)
• Results from 2009 data collection cycle
–Descriptive statistics
–Focus on factors associated with HIV
viral suppression
• Conclusions
Medical Monitoring Project (MMP)
• MMP is a stratified complex sample survey with
three stages: state, facility and individual patients
• Provides much clinical and behavioral data
–
–
–
–
–
Health outcomes
How patients interact with the care system
Barriers to care
Behaviors that affect health outcomes
Behaviors that affect transmission
• Is a primary source for providing HIV viral load
data for measuring National HIV/AIDS Strategy
progress
MMP Data Collection
• Annual cycle
– ‘Population Definition Period’ – January through
April of the calendar year
– ‘Surveillance Period’ – 12 months before the
interview (or attempt to contact if no interview)
• Two primary methods of collecting data
– Lengthy and in-depth interview with patient
– Medical record abstraction (MRA)
MMP Topic Areas
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Demographics
Access to care
HIV treatment and adherence
Sexual behavior
Drug and alcohol use
Prevention activities
Mental health
Health conditions and preventive therapy
Gynecological and reproductive history
Challenges
• Significant logistical challenges associated
with sampling, data collection and transfer
• CDC provides direction to 16 states, six large
cities and one U.S. territory, some of which
consider it surveillance, others research
• Facilities and providers are involved with
contacting patients and providing access to
medical records
MMP weighted data
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
responsible for weighting data
• Peer-reviewed article in near future
• For 2009 data, 9 strata, 64 clusters
• Separate weights for separate datasets
– Medical record
• Nine weights, frequency of each ranges from 1 to 113
– Interview
• Five weights, frequency of each ranges from 2 to 89
• Weighted data provide population estimates
Washington MMP participants
compared to persons reported
to Washington core
surveillance
WA MMP participants similar to
persons reported to core surveillance
WA MMP participants similar to persons
reported to core surveillance (cont.)
WA MMP participants similar to persons
reported to core surveillance (cont.)
Antiretroviral (ARV) Use
ARV use
ARV use during past 12 months
(from medical record)
Odds Ratio = 12.4 (3.3 – 45.8)
Currently on ARVs
(from interview)
Odds Ratio = 25.4 (6.7 - 96.4)
Ever taken ARVs
(from interview)
Odds Ratio = 15.2 (3.8 - 61.0)
Drug holiday during past year
(from interview)
Odds Ratio = 3.7 (1.5 - 9.3)
Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Drug and alcohol abuse
Substance abuse, other than alcohol
(from medical record)
No substance abuse vs. 3 or more substances,
Odds Ratio = 6.4 (2.2 – 18.1)
Alcohol abuse
(from medical record)
Odds Ratio = 2.8 (1.4 – 5.6)
Illicit drug use
(from interview)
Odds Ratio = 2.4 (1.4 – 4.3)
Income
Income
Income
(from interview)
Odds Ratio = 1.8 (1.2 – 2.7)
Access to Services
Access to services
• Service gap = person claimed to have needed the
service, but was unable to get it
• Services include:
– Case management, counseling, ADAP, medication
reminders, peer support, dental, mental health, substance
abuse counseling, SSDI, domestic violence services,
housing, meals, home health services, transportation,
childcare, interpreter
• Percent of respondents with gap for each service
ranged from 1% to 17%
• Total service gap for individual participants ranged
from zero to five
Access to services
Access to services
(from interview)
Odds Ratio = 4.7 (2.0 – 11.0)
Summary of Associations
Significant associations
• Among 250 participants with a Surveillance
Period Visit Form (SPVF) and Medical History
Form (MHF), there were 40 who did not have
an HIV viral load test during the Surveillance
Period.
• There were Standard Interview forms
completed for 180 participants. Of these 180,
there were 24 who did not have an HIV viral
load test during the Surveillance Period.
Strength of significant associations between
viral suppression and various factors
Strength of significant associations between
viral suppression and various factors
Strength of significant associations between
viral suppression and various factors
Other associations between viral suppression
and various factors
Conclusions
• MMP is a complex survey that provides a wealth
of medical and behavioral information about HIVpositive people in care
• Two major components include interview and
medical record abstraction
• HIV viral load suppression among persons in care
is associated most strongly with ARV use, also
with drug and alcohol use, income and access to
support services
• Coming soon: demonstration project of sampling
from eHARS rather than through three stages
Acknowledgements
• Community and provider advisors:
– Mark Garrett, Dr. Brad Roter, Dr. Julie Dombrowski
• Public Health – Seattle & King County:
– Elizabeth Barash, Susan Buskin, Shirley Zhang, Winnie
Alston, Lexa Moongrace
• Washington State Department of Health:
– Maria Courogen, Leslie Pringle, Elizabeth Mack, Katie
Heidere, Shawn McBrien, Susan Bosse
• MMP Team at the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, especially our project officer, Dr.
Linda Beer
Questions?