Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 www.elsevier.com/locate/microrel Adhesion strength and contact resistance of flip chip on flex packages––effect of curing degree of anisotropic conductive film M.A. Uddin, M.O. Alam, Y.C. Chan *, H.P. Chan Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong Received 17 March 2003; received in revised form 5 May 2003 Abstract The use of anisotropic conductive adhesives film (ACF) as an interconnect materials for flip-chip joining technique is increasingly becoming a vital part of the electronics industry. Therefore, the performances of the ACF joint turn into an important issue and depend mostly on the curing condition of the ACF matrix. ACF is a thermosetting epoxy matrix impregnated with small amount of electrically conductive particles. During component assembly, the epoxy resin is cured to provide mechanical connection and the conducting medium provides electrical connection in the z-direction. Therefore, the cure process is critical to develop the ultimate electrical and mechanical properties of ACF. The purpose of the present work is to investigate optimum curing conditions to achieve the best performance of ACF joints. Differential scanning calorimeter was used to measure the curing degree. Adhesion strength was evaluated by 90° peeling test. The contact resistance has also been studied as a function of bonding temperature and curing degree. Results show a strong dependence of curing condition on the electrical and mechanical performances. Adhesion strength increases exponentially with the curing degree. Whereas the contact resistance decreases with the curing degree and achieve the minimum value at 87% of curing. Co-relation of the curing degree of the ACF was also studied through the detailed investigation of the fracture surfaces under scanning electron microscopy. Ó 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction One of the most promising technologies of todayÕs chip-level interconnection is flip-chip technology, which has emerged as a high density, and high performance interconnection method for integrated-circuit chips. A potential revolutionary technology of attaching devices by flip chip without solder bumps/balls and underfill epoxy is to use of conductive adhesive. They have recently gained much attention as an environmentally friendly alternative to tin/lead (Sn/Pb) solders [1]. Conductive adhesive not only avoid the toxicity and environmental concerns from lead and chlorofluorocar- * Corresponding author. Tel.: +852-2788-7130; fax: +8522788-7579. E-mail address: [email protected] (Y.C. Chan). bon-based flux cleaners, but also have the following technological advantages over their counterparts: (1) the lower curing temperature required for adhesive reduces joint fatigue and stress cracking problems enabling the use of heat sensitive or non-solderable materials; (2) fewer processing steps enable an increase in production throughput; (3) the higher flexibility and the closer match in coefficient of thermal expansion enable a more compliant connection and minimize failures; (4) the smaller filler particle size facilitates finer line resolution. Adhesive could also provide most of the needs for flip-chip technology by themselves: create short electrical path, ensure good horizontal gap insulation, reduce joint stress and provide strong mechanical adhesion. Furthermore, no cleaning/flux is required, secondary underfill is not necessary, and placement of adhesives is not critical. Therefore, more recently, conductive adhesives are playing an increasingly important role in the design and production of electronic packages application [2]. 0026-2714/$ - see front matter Ó 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0026-2714(03)00185-9 506 M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 Two critical reliability issues of conductive adhesive application are contact resistance shift and poor adhesion strength. Extensive studies have been done for the former subjected to various environmental stresses [3,4] and slightly work on the latter. High adhesion strength is a critical parameter of fine pitch interconnection that fragile to shocks encountered during assembly, handling and lifetime. Initial efforts at this aspect mostly focused on isotropic conductive adhesive (ICA) for surface mount lead attachments, which involve structure–property–performance study [5] and dropping mounted chip and board assemblies onto hard surfaces from certain height [6]. Anisotropic conductive adhesive (ACA) is a special variety of ICA which conduct electricity only in one direction. ACA contains less conductive particles (lower percentage of metal fillers in volume) than that of ICA. The concentration of particles is controlled in such a way that just enough particles are present to assure reliable electrical conductivity in the z-direction (normal to the plan of adhesive film) while concentration is far below a critical value to achieve percolation conduction in the x–y plane [3]. Thus it has been attracted much interest because of ultra-fine capability [7]. Because of the anisotropic property, ACA can be deposited over the entire contact region as film (known as anisotropic conductive film, ACF), thus it is predicted to increase mechanical reliability [7,8]. However, there is still some sort of uncertainty of using ACF considering proper formulation and optimized curing profile which lead to unstable contact resistance, poor adhesion strength etc. Due to poor adhesion with the flex, void may nucleate at the ACF/flex interface, which might propagate to the interconnection to loss the electrical conduction [9]. The physical, electrical and mechanical properties of the cured conductive adhesives depend to a large extent on the degree of cure of the epoxy composition of the conductive adhesive [10]. Successful bonding involves the selection of proper bonding parameter during which chemical reactions proceed to completion, in order for it to develop its service strength [10]. In our previous piece of research, we studied on the peel strength of chip-on-flex using ACF and tried to improve adhesion through plasma cleaning of the flex substrate [9]. There is little work done elsewhere on the adhesion strength of flip chip, especially with the curing degree of ACF matrix. Current work focuses on the understanding of the curing degree that affects the peel strength and contact resistance of chip on flex (COF) in terms of fracture microstructures. Firstly we investigated the effect of different bonding temperature on the contact resistance of the joint. After measuring contact resistance, we measured the peel strength of the flip-chip bond and correlated it with the curing degree of the ACF. The results of this study would allow the development of ACF joints using fine pitch flip chips on flexible substrate with more reliable product. 2. Experiments 2.1. Materials The FCOF packages are made up of three different materials, namely silicon chip, ACF and flexible substrate. 2.1.1. Flexible substrate It contains polyimide film as a base materials, Cu trace as conductor and an adhesive in between. This adhesive is an epoxy-based polymer. The thickness of the polyimide base film, adhesive and Cu trace is 50, 10, and 5 lm. The thickness of Ni coating and Au flash on Cu trace was about 1–2 and 0.1–0.4 lm, respectively. 2.1.2. Silicon chip The dimension of the test chip have a size of 11 3 mm2 , with 46 46 lm2 square shaped opening around the periphery. These openings are of aluminum metal with 1% silicon limited by chip-passivation layer. There was not any bumping on the Al metal pad. Thus this kind of chip is known as bumpless chip. There are 368 Al pads in the chip. Among them, 300 pads run parallel to the length of the chip for electrical connection. These Al pads are arranged in sets of five as a group; with two adjacent bumps for measuring insulation resistance and three for contact resistance. There are a total of 60 sets of these daisy-chained bumps within the chip––30 sets in each side. 2.1.3. Anisotropic conductive adhesives film The type of ACF used in this study was consists of an epoxy layer and filled with conductive particles. The conductive particles are made up of polymers plated with a thin layer of nickel and gold followed by a thin insulation layer. The thickness of ACF is 35 lm and particle diameter is 3.5 lm. Concentration of the conductive particles is about 3.5 million/mm3 . The glass transition temperature (Tg ) of the ACF is 130 °C. 2.2. Bonding process The procedures for flip-chip mounting included several steps: ACF placement, pre-bonding, IC placement and final bonding. A manual flip-chip bonding machine (Karl Suss 9493 Mauren) was used to carry out the prebonding, i.e. placement of ACF on flex. The pre-bonding pressure was 1 MPa, while the temperature and time were 100 °C and 7 s respectively. A semi-automatic flipchip bonding machine (Toray SA2000) was used to conduct the final bonding. The substrate pattern and the position of the chip bumps were aligned automatically by the flip-chip bonder. Finally, the chip is bonded to the substrate by applying heat and pressure simultaneously. For final bonding, the pressure and time were M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 100 MPa and 10 s respectively, while the bonding temperature was varied from 150–230 °C. The alignment accuracy is 2 lm. Fig. 1(a) and (b) shows the schematic 507 of the bonding process and the appearance of the assembly after bonding. 2.3. Contact resistance measurement The contact resistance of FCOF assemblies was measured by using the four-point probe method and the schematic circuitry is shown in Fig. 2. The circuitry has been improved comparing with the circuitry illustrated in Ref. [11] and there was no need to measure the trace resistance before bonding. In the test, 1 mA constant DC current was applied to the circuit and the voltage was read from the HEWLETT PACKARD multimeter. Then the contact resistance was obtained simply by using OhmÕs Law, R ¼ V =I. 2.4. Adhesion measurements The 90° peel test has been widely used to measure the adhesion strength of multilayer films. To measure the adhesion strength of the ACF, flexible substrate were cut from the side of the chip to make it to 3.5 mm width and then peeled out from the bonded sample keeping the chip fixed. Special accessory was prepared for smallscale peel strength measurement. Fig. 3(a) and (b) shows the schematic arrangement and prepared sample respectively for measuring the peel strength. The test was carried out by the Instron Model Mini 44 Tester, (Intertek testing Services, England) with a cross-head speed of 10 mm/min. Instrument was adjusted deliberately in order to peel out the flex from the whole chip. Five samples were tested per given condition. 2.5. Failure analysis After the peel test, the fracture surfaces of the samples (both the chip side and substrate side) were examined by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to study the fractography characteristics of both chip and substrate sides. 30° tilting of the stage was used to get the perspective view of the surface morphology. 2.6. Differential scanning calorimeter tests Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the bonding process, (b) appearance of the assembly after bonding. Curing degree of ACF was examined with a Modulated differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) instrument (by TA Instruments, Model 2910). It measures both the heat capacity of endothermic and exothermic transitions of a sample and provides quantitative information regarding the enthalpic changes. Dynamic curing experiments were performed from 50–250 °C with ramp rates of 10 °C per min. In order to obtain accurate heat flow or experimental data, a base line for each experiment conditions was recorded by using empty sample pans before actually conducting the cure reaction in the 508 M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 Fig. 2. Schematic circuitry to measure the contact resistance using the four-point probe method. amount of adhesive was taken form the fractured surface after the peel test and prepared the samples for DSC tests. The reaction was considered complete when the rate curve levels off to the base line. 3. Results 3.1. Curing degree The DSC has been widely utilized to elucidate the key cure process parameters such as the extent and rate of chemical conversion. It quantifies both the heat capacity of endothermic and exothermic transitions of a sample and provides quantitative information regarding the enthalpy changes. The method assumes that for a cure process the measured heat flow is proportional to the conversion rate. This assumption is valid only for chemical reaction and no other enthalpic events, such as evaporation, enthalpy relaxation, or significant changes in heat capacity with conversion. In practice however, it has proven to be a reasonably good assumption. A commonality of all thermosetting systems is the liberation of heat accompanying cure [10], DHE Reactants ! Products; Fig. 3. (a) Schematic arrangement for measuring the peel strength, (b) prepared sample for peel strength measurement. sample pan. To avoid temperature gradients small sample quantities (<10 mg) were placed in aluminum hermetic pans and were run on MDSC. In this way, two kind of samples (1) the raw ACF and (2) cured ACF after peel out the bonding were examined. For raw ACF, it was removed from the refrigerator and allowed to warm up to room temperature for one hour before conducting the experiments. For cured ACF, small where DHE is the exothermic heat, expressed as heat per mole of reacting groups (kcal mol1 or kJ mol1 ) or per mass of materials (cal g1 or J g1 ). In this case, during the curing of ACF, the exothermic reaction of epoxy with primary and secondary amines was occurred [10]. Fig. 4 shows the typical DSC traces of ACF for both uncured and cured at different temperature. At the initial stage, the reaction rate increases with time and temperature due to the lower viscosity. However, after reaching a certain degree of curing, the reaction rate goes down due to the increased viscosity. Viscosity increases in M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 5 509 1.5 Peel strength (N/mm) Heat Flow-Endo up (W/g) 4 3 Uncured Cured at Cured at Cured at Cured at Cured at 2 1 150˚C 170˚C 190˚C 210˚C 230˚C 0 50 100 150 200 250 Temperature (˚C) 0.5 0 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 Bonding temperature (˚C) Fig. 4. Dynamic DSC scans for uncured and different temperature bonded ACF. proportion with the cross-linking and hence reduces the mobility of the polymer molecules for further reaction. As a result, both cured and uncured ACF showed a broad exothermic cure peak at a temperature range from 80 to 210 °C. They all had the same peak temperature, approximately 130 °C. Based upon the assumption that the exothermic heat evolved during the cure is directly proportional to the extent of cure, the curing degree a can be expressed by the relationship between the total exothermic heat of raw material QT and the residual or exothermic heat of previously cured material QR . The relationship can be written as follows [10]: a¼ 1 QT QR QT Fig. 6. Peel strength of different bonding temperature. sult shows that the ACF was only 24% cured, when the bonding temperature was 150 °C. In contrast when the bonding temperature was 230 °C, the ACF becomes 98% cured. During bonding process, temperature was maintained to increase the fluidity of ACF and then to ð1Þ QT & QR were measured from dynamic DSC scan of the sample of uncured and cured at different temperature respectively. Fig. 5 shows the curing degree of ACF for different bonding condition. It is obvious that the curing degree depends upon the bonding temperature. The re- 100 Curing Degree (%) 80 60 40 20 0 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 Bonding Temperature (˚C) Fig. 5. Curing degree at different bonding temperature. Fig. 7. Fracture surfaces. (a) Flex side and (b) chip side, after the peel strength test for bonding temperature of 150 °C. 510 M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 Fig. 8. Fracture surfaces. (a) Flex side and (b) chip side, after the peel strength test for bonding temperature of 210 °C. Fig. 9. Fracture surfaces. (a) Flex side and (b) chip side, after the peel strength test for bonding temperature of 230 °C. quickly cure when maintaining constant pressure on the chip [11]. In this thermal curing process of the epoxybased adhesive, higher temperature initiates and accelerates the cross-linking reaction by providing higher active energy. Therefore, the curing degree of ACF also increases with the increase of curing temperature. debonding occurred at the flex/ACF layer interface. At the flex side only some uncured monomer of adhesive was observed. ACF was found on the chip side. It could be said that the adhesion between ACF and flex is 5 In this work, peel strength were measured for studying the adhesion of the COF packages. The results of the peel strength measurement are plotted in Fig. 6. The curve shows that the peel strength increases with the bonding temperature. As bonding temperature increases, the curing degree of this epoxy-based adhesive increases resulting in stronger chemical bonding at the interface and leading to increase in adhesion. For understanding the fracture mode, it is essential to study the fracture surface along with the peel test data. Fig. 7 shows the fracture surfaces of the substrate side and chip side after the peel strength test for the sample cured at 150 °C. Fractured surface at both flex and chip sides are very smooth. It is clear from the SEM images that Contact Resistance (Ohm) 3.2. Adhesion study 4 3 2 1 0 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 Bonding Temperature (ºC) Fig. 10. Contact resistance for different bonding temperature. M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 3.3. Contact resistance The contact resistance of FCOF assemblies was measured by using the four-point probe method. Fig. 10 shows the variation of the contact resistance with the bonding temperature for bumpless FCOF. From the curve, it is clear that the contact resistance of the packages decreases with the increase of bonding temperature up to 210 °C and then increases when the bonding temperature was used above 210 °C. FCOF packages assembled at 210 °C showed the best contact resistance when compared to those assembled at other different temperatures. For the bumpless FCOF packages assembled at 210 °C, the average contact resistance was 0.12 X. 4. Discussion 4.1. Adhesion strength The curing degree of ACF plays an important role in determining the reliability of the ACF joints. As the curing of ACF proceeds, the linear polymer chain in the epoxy resin grows and branches to form cross-links [12]. At the lower degree of cross-linking, the polymer chains are capable of moving relatively easily and exhibit less adhesion strength. Again, as the bonding temperature increases the degree of cross-linking as well as adhesion also increases. Because, the polymer chains locked together and their movement become consequently somewhat restricted. Cross-linked polymer chains are chemically bound together to give a three-dimensional 1.5 Peel Strength (N/mm) weaker than that of the ACF/chip. This is because, ACF at chip side become more cured than ACF at flex side, as heat is applied from chip side. It also indicates that this curing temperature is not sufficient and needs to be set at a temperature higher than 150 °C for optimum bonding of ACF for reliable flip-chip bonding. However, the failure mode changes at high-temperature bonding. Fig. 8 depicts the failed surface of the interfaces when the bonding temperature was 210 °C. In the flex side, some ACF materials are visible. At least, ACF adhered well with some portion of the flex. Interdiffusion of the ACF to the flex is clear at the periphery of the ACF patches. Fig. 9 depicts the failed surface of the interfaces when the bonding temperature was 230 °C. The ACF was found in both sides and the fractured surfaces are very rough. Extensive deformation and smearing of the ACF was noticed for such high-temperature bonding. It is also interesting to get the conductive particles in the both sides. Thus it is confirmed that fracture occurred through the ACF. It reveals that the adhesion between flexible substrate and ACF improved substantially. 511 1 0.5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Curing degree (%) Fig. 11. Dependence of the peel strength of the joints on the curing degree. ‘‘chicken wire’’ structure [13]. So, the higher the curing degree, the stronger the chemical bonding and the better adhesion strength at the ACF interface. High temperature also promotes the physical adsorption and diffusion between adhesive and adherent. Moreover, high temperature is beneficial to wetting and flowing of the ACF due to lowering its surface energy. As a result peel strength increases significantly with the increase of bonding temperature (Fig. 6). Fig. 11 shows the dependence of the peel strength of the joints on the curing degree of ACF. It was observed that peel strength increases at first slowly with curing degree and after 75% curing, it starts to increase quickly. This is a very common phenomenon reported elsewhere that partially cured polymer shows weaker strength and later it increases with the degree of curing [14]. However, in this experiment, after 87% curing of ACF (i.e. bonded at 210 °C), peel strength increases at an unusual manner than the typical polymer. It implies that other mechanism is also contributing to increase the strength. Fracture mode for these higher cured samples is also different than that of the expectation. Fracture surface, either at flex or chip side, shows very rough morphology with the ACF material in both sides (Fig. 9). Fracture occurred through the ACF, i.e. adhesion strength of ACF to flex substrate is higher than the intrinsic strength of the ACF matrix. It is really surprising why highly cross-linked ACF at higher curing degree failed through the ACF matrix. Some strong reactions must occur between ACF and the substrate, which is responsible for such contradictory fracture mode. However, the fracture mode study of the sample bonded at 210 °C revealed that in some area of flex, ACF patches adhered well with the flex. High magnification study at the interface between the ACF patches and flex prove some inter-diffusion and/or reaction between ACF epoxy and the flex (Fig. 12). It is anticipated that these reactions between flex substrate to the ACF started at 210 °C. The possible reaction mechanism is described below. 512 M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 However, the Tg (glass transition temperature) of this adhesive on the PI is comparatively low (80 °C), which might be responsible to the interfacial reaction of the ACF at higher temperature. During the bonding process at a temperature of 230 °C, substantial heat passes through the ACF to flex substrate. Therefore, the temperature of this laminated adhesive reaches far more than its Tg . As a result, it melts, inter-diffused and/or reacts with the ACF. After cooling, it re-solidifies and strengthened [17] the bond between ACF to flex substrate. Thus peel strength increases extensively for this high temperature bonded sample. From this evidence, it is proposed that at higher temperature the adhesion strength increases because of two folds reaction phenomenon: Fig. 12. ACF patches and flex express some inter-diffusion and/ or reaction. In a traditional polyimide flex substrate, an adhesive is used to bond copper foil to a flexible substrate and this adhesive becomes cured during the Cu lamination process [15,16]. The most important feature of the flexible substrate used in this experiment, is that this cured adhesive remains intake and adhered with the polyimide substrate even after the development of the Cu circuitry. That means, the base polyimide film is covered by a thin adhesive layer, which is now acting as a barrier layer between the PI and the ACF. Fig. 13 reveals the existence of such adhesive underneath the Cu traces of the substrate after the peel test. So, ACF material would virtually be bonded with this residue adhesive in the substrate side [9]. As this adhesive is already cured during Cu lamination and passes through some other process (such as Cu etching, dry film stripping, rinsing etc.) during Cu circuitry development, it no longer has any affinity to form firm bonding with the ACF. Moreover, the surface morphology of this adhesive is very smooth. Quite naturally, it renders mechanical interlocking between the flex and ACF. Therefore, lower adhesion strength was found at lower bonding temperature. Fig. 13. Existence of adhesive underneath the Cu traces. 1. Higher cross-linking of the ACF. 2. Interfacial diffusion and/or reaction between the ACF and the previous thin adhesive. Thus, it is concluded that adhesion strength increases at an unusual manner when we are considering only curing degree of the ACF. However, the inter-diffusion and/or reaction are contributing much more than the cross-linking reaction at 230 °C. 4.2. Contact resistance Contact resistance of ACF joints mainly depends on followings [18] 1. The number of conductive particles trapped between bumps and pads, 2. the successful removal of insulation layer and 3. contact area of deformed particles. The first one depends on the rate of curing of ACF and temperature of the bonding process. Third point, i.e. deformation of the particles depends on the applied pressure during bonding. Insulation layer remove during the early stage of the bonding time. When pressure is just applied, entrapped particles moves between the pads, by the way due to friction, insulation layer wear out and conductive metal coating come in contact with the pads. During the early stage of the bonding process, the ACF becomes soft and rubbery and this transformation allows the conductive particles to move within the ACF. When the curing process is completed, the ACF becomes hardened and the mobility of the conductive particles is lost. Higher bonding temperature results in higher curing degree shortly, and the ACF becomes stiffer with higher modulus. After the bonding process, the conductive particles only recoil a little for highly cured ACF. Thus the higher contact area of the deformed particles remains stable to the pads and the contact resistance is relatively low. At the curing temperature of 150 °C, the ACF was mostly uncured and the conductive particles carried M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 No. of early failure joint 10 8 6 4 2 0 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 Bonding Temperature (ºC) Fig. 14. Number of early failure joints for different bonding temperature. within the epoxy layer are able to move. Therefore, there is a possibility of the conductive particles to squeeze out form the pads interface due to the applied pressure through the soft adhesive. As a result, in some joints, higher and unstable contact resistance and even sometime open joints were found. Fig. 14 shows the number of early failure or open joint with the bonding temperature among 60 joints. At the bonding temperature of 210 °C, the ACF becomes cured adequately (87%) and the conductive particles within the epoxy layer remains stable throughout the ACF joints. A reliable interconnects should have metal-to-metal contact through out the die pad-to-the deformed particles and deformed particles-to-the Cu pad of the substrate without any oxide layer [19]. 210 °C is optimum in respect of the contact area requirement having less possibility of the oxidation than the bonding temperature of 230 °C. Therefore, this bonding temperature creating the best contact and show the low contact resistance. However, when the bonding temperature was 230 °C, the ACF was cured much (98%) but the contact resistance becomes high. This may be due to the heat being absorbed by the FCOF packages and acting as a catalyst for oxidation of the Al pads. Aluminium atoms easily contribute its electrons to oxygen atoms to form aluminium oxide film. The aluminium oxide layer acts as a barrier between the Al pad–conductive particle and conductive particle–Cu pad, making difficulties for the electrons to flow through this Al pad–conductive particle–Cu pad path [11]. That leads to reduction in number of free electrons on its surface, hence, increases its electrical resistance. 5. Conclusions A systematic study was carried out to clarify the effects of the bonding temperature on the cross linking of the ACF matrix which in turn effects the performance of 513 the interconnection. The results show that the high temperature cured samples have higher reaction rates and a greater curing degree as well as high adhesion strength compared with low temperature cured samples. Contact resistance was also found to be strongly dependent on the curing degree. At temperatures of 210 °C, the curing degree was about 87% with lesser extent of oxide formation on Al pad and moderate adhesion strength. In contrast, if the bonding temperature is 230 °C, 98% curing of the ACF is achieved with higher extent of oxide formation on Al pad and highest adhesion strength. Hence, the ACF joints of the FCOF packages assembled at 210 °C performed better with lower contact resistance values when compared to those assembled at other different temperatures. It is therefore concluded that the performance of the ACF interconnects is greatly influenced by the bonding temperature as well as curing degree during the assembly of FCOF packages. In this study, the optimum temperature for bonding FCOF with ACF was concluded to be at 210 °C. Fracture modes were studied by SEM after the adhesion strength measurement. From the fracture surface images, it was found that epoxy of the ACF matrix start to react and inter-diffuse with the thin adhesive layer on the polyimide substrate at about 210 °C. After that reaction or inter-diffusion, fracture mode changes from flex-to-ACF to the ACF itself. This reaction or inter-diffusion of the ACF is proposed to be responsible for higher adhesion strength at higher bonding temperature. Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Strategic Research Grant of City University of Hong Kong (project no. 70001387, Reliability Study of Anisotropic Conductive Joints––Effect of Thermally Induced Warpage) and the Hong Kong SAR Government––Innovation and Technology Fund (ITF), University–Industry Collaboration Programme (project no. UIT/22). References [1] Xu S. Evaluating Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Electrically Conductive Adhesives for Electronic Applications. PhD Dissertation. Engineering Science and Mechanics Department. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002. p. 168–9. [2] Kim HK, Shi FG. Electrical reliability of electrically conductive adhesive joints: dependence on curing condition and current density. Microelectron J 2001;32(4):315– 21. [3] Dudek R et al. Reliability investigations on conductive adhesive joints with emphasis on the mechanics of the 514 [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] M.A. Uddin et al. / Microelectronics Reliability 44 (2004) 505–514 conduction mechanism. IEEE Trans––CPMT-A 2000; 23(3):462–9. Liu J et al. Surface characteristics, reliability and failure mechanisms of tin, copper and gold metallizations. IEEE Trans––CPMT-A 1997;20(1):21–30. Vona SA et al. Surface mount conductive adhesives with superior impact resistance. Proc Fourth Advanced Packaging Materials Conference, Chateau Elan, Braselton, Georgia, 1998. p. 261–7. Zwolinski M et al. Electrically conductive adhesives for surface mount solder replacement. IEEE Trans––CPMT-C 1996;19(4):241–50. Fu Y, Willander M, Liu J. Statistic of electric conductance through anisotropically conductive adhesive. IEEE Trans Comp Packag Technol 2000;24(2):250–5. Liu J et al. Overview of conductive adhesive joining technology in electronic packaging applications. Proceedings of the 3rd Adhesive Joining and Coating Technology in Electronics Manufacturing Conference, Binghamton, NY, September 1998. p. 1–18. Uddin MA, Alam MO, Chan YC, Chan HP. Plasma cleaning of the flex substrate for flip chip bonding with anisotropic conductive adhesive film (ACF). J Electron Mater, in press. Chan YC, Uddin MA, Alam MO, Chan HP. Curing kinetics of anisotropic conductive adhesive film. J Electron Mater 2003;32(3):131–6. Chan YC, Luk DY. Effects of bonding parameters on the reliability performance of anisotropic conductive adhesive [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] interconnects for flip-chip-on-flex packages assembly I. Different bonding temperature. Microelectron Reliab 2002; 42(8):1185–94. Connell G, Zenner RLD, Gerber JA. Conductive adhesive flip-chip bonding for bumped and unbumped die. In: Proceedings of the 47th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1997. p. 274–8. Yarlagadda PKDV, Stoynov LA, Kim Ill-Soo. An investigation into the performance of solar cured adhesive bonded joints. J Mater Process Technol 2001;113(1–3): 160–6. Clayton AM. Epoxy resins: chemistry and technology, 2nd ed. New York: M. Dekker; 1988. p. 603–718. Yun HK, Cho K, Kim JK, Park CE, Sim SM, Oh SY, Park JM. Effects of plasma treatment of polyimide on the adhesion strength of epoxy resin/polyimide joints. J Adhes Sci Technol 1997;11(1):95–104. Ghosh MK, Mittal KL. Polyimides: Fundamental and application. Marcel Dekker Inc; 1996. p. 430–3. Stearns TH. Flexible printed circuitry. In: Electronic packaging and interconnection series. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996. p. 86–91. Chuks NO, Samjid HM, David CW, David JW. Conduction mechanism in anisotropic conducting adhesive assembly. IEEE Trans Comp, Packaging, Manufact Technol–– Part A 1998;21(2):235–42. Yim MJ, Paik KW. The contact resistance and reliability of anisotropically conductive film (ACF). Adv Packag, IEEE Trans Adv Packag 1999;22(2):166–73.