* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download encore, a gene required for the regulation of germ line mitosis and
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Development 122, 281-290 (1996) Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1996 DEV5022 281 encore, a gene required for the regulation of germ line mitosis and oocyte differentiation during Drosophila oogenesis Nancy C. Hawkins, Julie Thorpe and Trudi Schüpbach Department of Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Insititute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA SUMMARY During Drosophila oogenesis, a stem cell daughter undergoes precisely four rounds of mitosis to generate a cyst of 16 cells interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges. One of the cells becomes the oocyte while the remaining 15 cells differentiate as nurse cells. We have identified a gene, encore, that is involved both in regulating the number of germline mitoses and in the process of oocyte differentation. Mutations in encore result in exactly one extra round of mitosis in the germline. Genetic and molecular studies indicate that this mitotic defect may be mediated through the gene bag-of-marbles. The isolation and characterization of mutiple alleles of encore revealed that they were all temperature sensitive for this phentoype. Mutations in encore also affect the process of oocyte differentiation. Egg chambers are produced in which the oocyte nucleus has undergone endoreplication often resulting in the formation of 16 nurse cells. We argue that these two phenotypes produced by mutations in encore represent two independent requirements for encore during oogenesis. INTRODUCTION of the mitotic spindle is associated with the fusome in dividing cystocytes. Two membrane cytoskeletal proteins have been identified as components of the fusome, α-spectrin and the huli tai shao (hts) protein, an adducin like molecule (Lin et al., 1994). Phenotypic analysis of hts mutations have provided evidence that the fusome plays a key role in cyst formation. Mutations in hts abolish the fusome resulting in egg chambers containing only a few nurse cells and which rarely form an oocyte (Yue and Spradling, 1992). A number of other mutations have been isolated in genetic screens for female sterility that affect the formation of the egg chamber. Two genes have been identified that are necessary for proper oocyte determination. Recessive mutations in Bicaudal-D (Bic-D) and egalitarian (egl) result in the production of egg chambers with 16 nurse cells and no oocyte (Schüpbach and Wieschaus, 1991; Suter et al., 1989). Two loci have been described that affect the posterior positioning of the oocyte within the egg chamber. Females mutant for spindle-C (spn-C) or dicephalic (dic) produce bipolar egg chambers in which the oocyte fails to move to the posterior pole of the egg chamber, and instead, resides in a central location and is flanked by nurse cells on either side (Gonzalez-Reyes and St Johnston, 1994; Lohs-Schardin, 1982). Few good candidates exist for genes directly involved in controlling stem cell or cystocyte divisions. Female sterile mutations in the ovarian tumor class of genes result in tumorous egg chambers containing hundreds of undifferentiated germ cells. For the majority of these genes, it has been suggested that they might only indirectly affect germline mitosis by disrupting germline sex determination (Pauli and Mahowald, 1990; Steinmann-Zwicky, 1992). However, one ovarian tumor mutant, bag-of-marbles Regulation of cell division is a crucial aspect in the development of multicellular organisms. At the tip of the Drosophila ovary, in the germarium, an invariant set of four mitotic divisions of a stem cell daughter leads to formation of the egg chamber. The germarium contains the germline stem cells. Each stem cell undergoes asymmetric cell division to produce a self renewing stem cell and a cystoblast. The cystoblast then undergoes four successive rounds of mitosis each followed by incomplete cytokinesis to form a cyst of 16 cells interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges called ring canals. This invariant pattern of cell division results in a cyst containing two cells with four rings canals, two cells with three ring canals, four cells with two ring canals and eight cells with a single ring canal. One of the two cells with four ring canals becomes the oocyte, and the remaining 15 cells differentiate as nurse cells. The 16 cell cyst then becomes surrounded by a layer of somatically derived follicle cells. Initially, the future oocyte occupies a central location in the egg chamber, but when the egg chamber exits the germarium the oocyte has assumed a posterior position in the egg chamber. This is the first visible sign of anterior-posterior asymmetry in the developing egg chamber (for review see King, 1970; Mahowald and Kambysellis, 1980; Spradling, 1993). The four mitotic division are accompanied by the growth of a cytoplasmic structure called the fusome (Telfer, 1975; Storto and King, 1989; Lin et al., 1994). The fusome extends through the ring canals of dividing cysts forming a branched structure connecting the germline cells. The fusome is postulated to control the pattern of cystocyte interconnections since one pole Key words: encore, oogenesis, mitosis, Drosophila, bag-of-marbles 282 N. C. Hawkins, J. Thorpe and T. Schüpbach (bam), has been implicated in directly controlling cystocyte divisions (McKearin and Spradling, 1990; McKearin and Christerson, 1994). Unlike most of the ovarian tumor mutants, bam affects both male and female gametogenesis. Females homozygous mutant for bam produce egg chambers containing from 50 to several hundred small, undifferentiated, cells. It has been demonstrated that the bam germ cells are mitotically active and it has been proposed that bam is required for the differentation of the cystoblast (McKearin and Ohlstein, 1995). We have identified a locus called encore (enc) that is required for the correct number of cystocyte divisions. Mutations in enc result in exactly one extra round of mitosis in the germline. We have demonstrated that this additional mitosis requires bam activity. In addition, an analysis of enc mutations has revealed a requirement for enc in the process of oocyte differentiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cytological and genetic mapping The encBB allele was isolated after mobilization of a P[w+-lac-Z] element (Bier et al., 1989). The P-element insertion was localized by in situ hybridization to polytene chromosomes using standard methods (Ashburner, 1989). A single insert was mapped to 63E on the left arm of the third chromosome (data not shown). Consistent with the physical mapping data enc failed to complement deficiencies that removed the region including Df(3L)A466 (63D1,2-64B1,2) (Kulkarni et al., 1994), Df(3L)GN34 (63D,E-64B1,2) (J. Garbe, personal communication) and Df(3L)HR119 (63C6-63E) (Wohlwill and Jose Bonner, 1991). A meiotic map position of 3-5.3 was determined by mapping enc relative to ru (3-0) by recombination. The outcrossed encBBr53 line was obtained by backcrossing encBB five generations to a y w stock then reestablishing the stock. For all marker mutations and balancers see Lindsley and Zimm (1992). Genetic screens The encBB P-element allele was mobilized using the ∆2-3 chromosome as a source of transposase activity (Robertson et al., 1988). The excision chromosomes were tested for lethality and female sterility in trans to Df(3L)A466. Out of a total of 245 excision chromosomes scored, 211 had reverted to wild type, confirming that the insertion of the P-element was responsible for the female sterility. A lethal excision line was generated, encr75, that failed to complement encBB for fertility and two EMS induced lethal mutations l63Ea and l63Ec for lethality (Wohlwill and Jose Bonner, 1991; Harrison et al., 1995). An EMS mutagenesis was designed to isolate both lethal and female sterile alleles at enc. st e/st e males were fed 30-50 mM EMS as described in Grigliatti (1986) and were mated to pipe st e/TM8, DTS4 th st Sb e females. Single st e */TM8, DTS4 th st Sb e females were mated to encr75/dsxD Sb e males. The crosses were raised for three days at 25˚C then shifted to 29˚C to eliminate progeny carrying TM8, a dominant temperature sensitive balancer chromosome. The F2 generation was then scored for the absence of the non ebony (st e */encr75) progeny indicating that a lethal mutation had been induced on the mutagenized chromosome. For lines that were not lethal the entire generation was transferred to an egg laying block. Only st e */encr75 females were capable of laying eggs since sibling females, st e */dsxD, were sterile due to the presence to the dsxD chromosome. Egg lay plates were then examined for absence of eggs, the production of abnormal eggs or morphologically normal eggs that failed to hatch. Balanced stocks for the lethal and female sterile mutations were generated by crossing st e */dsxD st e males to Df(3L)A466/TM3, Ser, Sb females and isolating st e*/TM3, Ser, Sb progeny. A total of 7600 chromosomes were scored for female sterility and 14 female sterile mutations were isolated. All the alleles were temperature sensitive for the production of egg chambers with extra nurse cells (Table 1). In addition, they all produced eggs with fused dorsal appendages in trans to the tester chromosome encr75. This ventralized phenotype will be described elsewhere (N. Hawkins, C. VanBuskirk, U. Grossniklaus and T. Schüpbach, unpublished data). All of the female sterile alleles were backcrossed to a ru st e ca chromosome to remove extraneous lethals and to verify that all the alleles were tightly linked to ru. A total of 8200 chromosomes were scored for lethality and 5 lethal mutations were isolated. Two of the lethal mutations, l(3)L5 and l(3)L1 failed to complement l63Ec (Harrison et al., 1995), while the other 3 lethal mutations, l(3)L8, l(3)L13 and l(3)L46 failed to complement l63Ea (Wohlwill and Jose Bonner, 1991). All of these lethal mutations complemented encBB. Morphological analysis of egg chambers Females were placed in vials containing yeast for 3-5 days in uncrowded conditions. Ovaries were then dissected in 1× phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) then fixed for 20 minutes in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 50 mM Pipes, pH 7.4. Following fixation they were rinsed once in 1× PBS then incubated in PBS overnight at 37˚C. Ovaries were teased apart with tungsten needles, mounted in 50% glycerol in PBS and examined using differential interference contrast microscopy. Immunocytochemistry For Hoechst staining, ovaries were dissected in 1× PBS, fixed for 15 minutes in 8% formaldehyde in PBS, rinsed with PBS then incubated in 1 µg/ml Hoechst for 5 minutes. After washing with PBS, ovaries were mounted in 50% glycerol in PBS. For staining of ring canals, ovaries were dissected and fixed as described above then incubated in the dark with 2 units of rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Bioprobes) for 20 minutes followed by extensive washing with PBS. Ovaries were then mounted in Aqua-polymount (Polysciences, Inc.) and visualized by confocal microscopy (BioRad MRC 600). To analyze tumorous ovaries a single ovary was placed on a subbed slide in a drop of 8% formaldehdye in PBS and covered with a siliconized coverslip. Gentle pressure was applied to the coverslip to disrupt the ovary. The ovaries were fixed for 15-20 minutes. The slide was then transferred onto dry ice and the coverslip removed with a razor blade. A drop of 0.1 mg/ml RNase in PBS was placed on the sample and then overlayed with a coverslip and incubated overnight Table 1. The EMS induced enc alleles are temperature sensitive for the extra nurse cell phenotype % mutant egg chambers† Alleles of enc/Df * D6 DD7 KK7 L32 M7 N8 OO6 Q4 R1 T2 UU3 WW1 XX1 Z3 18˚C 25˚C 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 10 1 1 1 1 30 29 62 1 39 24 63 78 67 75 49 41 17 72 *Df=Df(3L)A466. †A total of 200-400 egg chambers were scored for each genotype. The majority of mutant egg chambers (>95%) contained extra nurse cells while a small fraction of egg chambers (1-2%) were bipolar or had <15 nurse cells. encore and germ line mitosis at 4˚C. Slides were transferred to a slide jar and washed twice for 5 minutes in PBS. Actin was visualized by covering the tissue with 100 µl of rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin and covered with a siliconized coverslip. The slides were incubated in the dark for 20 minutes then washed twice for 10 minutes in PBS. To stain DNA, a drop of 0.5 µM YoPro (Molecular Probes) was placed on the sample and incubated for 7 minutes. The slides were subsequently washed in PBS and mounted in 50% glycerol in PBS. Whole-mount in situ hybridization Ovaries were dissected in Ringers and the ovariole teased apart. Then tissue was fixed in 4% paraformadehyde in PBS+0.1% Tween, 10% DMSO and 3 volumes of heptane for 20 minutes. All subsequent steps were carried out according to Tautz and Pfeifle (1989). Digoxigeninlabelled antisense RNA probes for bam and oskar were synthesized using the RNA genius kit according to manufacture’s instructions (Boehringer Mannheim). Ovaries were mounted in Aqua-polymount (Polysciences, Inc.). RESULTS encore mutants affect formation of the egg chamber We have identified a new locus called encore (enc) that is involved in female gametogenesis. The first allele of enc, encBB, was isolated as a recessive female sterile mutation during a P-element mutagenesis (E. Shaddix and T. Schüpbach, unpublished). Females homozygous for the Pelement insertion were viable but exhibited defects during oogenesis. To examine the phenotype more closely, ovaries were dissected from females homozygous for encBB and stained with Hoechst to visualize the nuclei. Wild-type egg chambers consist of 15 nurse cells and an oocyte surrounded by a layer of somatically derived follicle cells (Fig. 1A). In enc ovaries, three classes of mutant egg chambers were observed. The most abundant class consists of egg chambers that contain twice the normal number of germline cells. In these egg chambers, a single oocyte develops at the posterior pole and the remaining 31 cells differentiate as nurse cells (Fig. 1B). A second less frequent class consists of bipolar egg chambers that, in addition to exhibiting an increase in the number of germline cells, also have a defect in the correct positioning of 283 the oocyte. The oocyte develops in the center of the egg chamber and is flanked by nurse cells on both sides (Fig. 1C). This phenotype has been previously described for mutants in spn-C and dic (Gonzalez-Reyes and St Johnston, 1994; LohsSchardin, 1982). However, unlike enc, the bipolar egg chambers present in these mutants contain the correct number of germline cells. Finally, a small class of egg chambers are produced that contain less than 16 germline cells. These egg chambers fail to differentiate an oocyte and thus have only nurse cells (Fig. 1B,D). Frequently, egg chambers with a reduced number of nurse cells are directly adjacent to an egg chamber with extra nurse cells. The nuclei from these two egg chambers are comparable in size and the total number of germline cells from the two egg chambers adds up to 32. In Fig. 1D one egg chamber contains 8 nurse cells while the adjacent post vitellogenic egg chamber has 23 nurse cells and an oocyte. This suggests that in the germarium when an egg chamber containing twice the number of germ line cells becomes surrounded by follicle cells a small number of nurse cells may be pinched off from the larger egg chamber and packaged independently. Thus, our morphological observations indicate that the primary defect in enc egg chambers is a doubling in the number of germline cells. encBB behaves as a temperature sensitive recessive gain-of-function allele The encBB allele exhibits complex genetic behavior. First, the allele is temperature sensitive. At 18˚C, 59% of the egg chambers derived from females homozygous for encBB have 15 nurse cells, while at 25˚C only 6% of the egg chambers dissected from homozygous females contain the normal number of nurse cells (Table 2). Second, encBB also behaves as a gain-of-function allele. The phenotype significantly weakens when encBB is placed in trans to a deficiency. The number of egg chambers at 25˚C containing 15 nurse cells increased to 34% in hemizygous females (Table 2). Similar results were obtained using other deficiencies (data not shown). To determine whether this gain-of-function phenotype was the result of modifers in the genetic background, the original encBB stock was outcrossed several generations. In the modified genetic background, encBB still retained it’s gain-of-function Fig. 1. The ovarian phenotype of encBB/encBB at 25˚C. Ovaries were stained with Hoechst to visualize nuclei. (A) A wild-type ovariole containing a series of egg chambers. Each egg chamber contains 16 germline cells surrounded by a layer of follicle cells (fc). The large polyploid nurse cell nuclei (ncn) are stained intensely while the diploid oocyte nucleus is not visible. The oocyte (o) is located at the posterior pole of the egg chamber. (B-D) Egg chambers derived from encBB homozygous females. (B) Mutant ovarioles containing egg chambers with extra nurse cells and egg chambers with too few nurse cells. (C) A bipolar egg chamber containing extra nurse cells with the oocyte located in the center of the egg chamber. (D) An egg chamber containing 23 nurse cells (arrowhead) and an oocyte followed by an egg chamber with only 8 nurse cells (arrow). In all panels anterior is oriented to the left. N. C. Hawkins, J. Thorpe and T. Schüpbach *At a low frequency (<0.5%) of the extra nurse cell egg chambers have reverse polarity; the oocyte is located at the anterior end of the egg chamber. †The majority of bipolar egg chambers (>99%) also have extra nurse cells. character. However, the production of the bipolar and reduced nurse cells classes were influenced by genetic background since the frequency of these classes dropped to less than 2% (data not shown). Screen for new enc alleles Given the unusual properties of the encBB allele, it was unclear whether or not the defects associated with encBB represent the loss-of-function phenotype at the enc locus. To address this concern, we performed an EMS mutagenesis to generate point mutations in the enc locus (see Materials and Methods). Our goal was to determine whether the loss of enc function would lead to female sterility or zygotic lethality, and if any other phenotypes were associated with mutations at the enc locus. In this screen, 14 female sterile alleles were isolated. All these alleles failed to complement the original P-element insertion allele encBB and therefore were new enc alleles. No lethal alleles of enc were isolated. Analysis of the ovarian phenotype of the EMS induced alleles revealed that they all exhibited the same egg chamber defects seen in encBB. Like the encBB allele, the primary defect observed in all the alleles was a doubling in nurse cell number. However, in contrast to the original encBB allele, the bipolar and reduced nurse cell classes occurred at a very low frequency, generally making up <1% of the total mutant egg chambers. The frequency of these two classes was comparable to an outcrossed encBB line, lending support to the idea that these phenotypes are sensitive to genetic background. None of the alleles produced any novel phenotypes. A comparison of the ovarian phenotype at 18˚C and 25˚C revealed, that like encBB, the EMS induced alleles were also temperature sensitive, with the exception of encL32 (Table 1). At 18˚C, mutant ovaries were composed primarily of egg chambers with 15 nurse cells. On average less than 2% of the egg chambers contained a doubling in nurse cell number (except encT2/Df whose ovaries contain 10% mutant egg chambers). However, at 25˚C, the non-permissive temperature, the strength of the phenotype increases significantly, with many of the alleles (e.g. encKK7, encR1) producing up to 75% mutant egg chambers. To determine the genetic nature of the EMS induced alleles we compared the homozygous phenotype to the phenotype when the alleles are in trans to a deficiency (Fig. 2). The alleles that produced the strongest phenotype when homozygous, encR1, encKK7, encUU3 and encDD7 all appear to behave as gainof-function alleles like the original encBB allele. In particular, 25.0 XX1 UU3 0.0 WW1 59 6 99 34 T2 3 17 1 5 R1 6 21 0 12 Q4 33 55 0 48 N8 18 25 18 25 50.0 M7 encBB/encBB encBB/encBB encBB/Df(3L)A466 encBB/Df(3L)A466 bipolar† =15 nurse cells L32 ˚C >15 nurse cells enc/Df 75.0 KK7 Genotype >15 nurse cells* enc/enc DD7 % egg chambers 100.0 DDD6 Table 2. The encBB P-element insertion is a recessive temperature-sensitive gain-of-function allele % mutant egg chambers 284 enc alleles Fig. 2. A comparison of the percentage of mutant egg chambers derived from homozygous vs. hemizygous females at 25˚C. To obtain homozgous viable stocks it was necessary to remove extraneous lethals by recombination. Since we noticed variability in the phenotype due to genetic background, the recombinant chromsome for each allele was used in both the hemizygous and homozygous combinations. A total of 200-400 egg chambers were scored for each genotype. although encR1 and encKK7 display only modest improvement in phenotype in trans to a deficiency at 25˚C, there is a vast difference between the homozygous and hemizygous phenotype at 18˚C. They are the only two alleles that result in a penetrant extra nurse cell phenotype when homozygous at 18˚C; encR1 produces 99% mutant egg chambers while encKK7 produces 88% mutant egg chambers. In trans to a deficiency at 18˚C, both alleles produce less than 1% mutant egg chambers (Table 1). A large number of the alleles when homozygous produced a weaker phenotype in which only 10-25% of the egg chambers contained extra nurse cells. For the majority of these alleles, the phenotype is similar or slightly stronger in trans to the deficiency suggesting that many of these weaker alleles are potentially loss-of-function alleles. However, because of the influence of genetic background and the variability among individuals of the same genotype we cannot conclude that any of the alleles are amorphic. A molecular characterization will be necessary to resolve this issue. In conclusion, we have isolated a collection of both loss-offunction and gain-of-function alleles of enc. The gain-offunction alleles produce the same phenotype as the loss-offunction alleles, suggesting that the gain-of-function alleles behave as antimorphs and interfere with the wild-type function of the gene. There is no indication of a zygotic requirement for enc since no lethal enc alleles were isolated and the female sterile alleles do not show reduced viability. Extra round of mitosis There are two models that can explain the doubling in nurse cell number seen in enc egg chambers. In the first model, instead of the follicle cells surrounding one 16 cell cyst they would incorrectly package two 16 cell cysts together, thus producing a 32 cell egg chamber. This would result in an egg chamber containing four cells with four ring canals, and since the two 16 cell cysts are independent, two oocytes should develop. A morphological analysis of the enc phenotype suggests that this explanation is unlikely since the doubling in nurse cell number that occurs in enc is not accompanied by the appearance of a second oocyte. Alternatively, a doubling in the nurse cell number could be achieved by one extra round of encore and germ line mitosis 285 Fig. 3. Confocal images of egg chambers derived from wild-type and enc females at 25˚C stained with rhodamine-conjugated phallodin to visualize ring canals. (A) A wild-type egg chamber with four ring canals attached to the oocyte. (B) An extra nurse cell egg chamber derived from encBB/encR1 with the oocyte located at the posterior pole. There is an increase in the total number of ring canals within the egg chamber. (C) A higher magnification view of the oocyte in B which has five ring canals (arrow indicates the fifth ring canal which is orientated on its side). (D) A bipolar egg chamber from encBB/encBB in which the oocyte, developing in the center of the egg chamber (arrow), possesses 5 ring canals. Scale bar, (A,B) 50 µm, (C) 20 µm, (D) 70 µm. mitosis in the germline. Instead of the normal four rounds of mitosis to produce 16 cells, a fifth round of mitosis would generate 32 cells. This second model predicts the existence of two cells with five ring canals. To distinguish between these two models, egg chambers were stained with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin to visualize the actin-rich ring canals. In wild-type egg chambers, we always observed four ring canals attached to the oocyte (Fig. 3A). When enc egg chambers with extra nurse cells were examined the oocyte invariably possessed five ring canals. In enc egg chambers in which the oocyte is correctly positioned at the posterior pole there is an increase in the total number of ring canals accompanying the increase in nurse cell number (Fig. 3A). Moreover, five ring canals are clearly visible attached to the oocyte (Fig. 3B,C). In bipolar egg chambers containing extra nurse cells the oocyte which develops in the center of the egg chamber also has five ring canals (Fig. 3D). The presence of cells with five rings canals clearly demonstrates that the doubling in nurse cell number is due to one extra round of mitosis in the germline. Since we never observe a cell with more than five ring canals, the number of extra divisions is limited to one, consistent with the observation that the total number of germline cells never exceeds 32. As in wild type, one of the two cells with the maximum number of ring canals develops as an oocyte and the remaining cells differentiate as nurse cells. Therefore, the ‘correct’ cell is still determined as an oocyte. In the bipolar egg chambers, the oocyte also has five ring canals. Therefore, the mispositioning of the oocyte is not a result of the wrong cell being determined as the oocyte. Instead, it represents a failure of the oocyte to assume its correct position in the egg chamber. bam expression is expanded in enc mutants To futher investigate the mitotic defect, we took advantage of one of the few available molecular markers that is differentially expressed in dividing cysts, bam. In wild-type ovaries, bam is expressed in the cystoblast and 2 cell cysts. This is seen as a narrow band of staining at the tip of the germarium immediately posterior to the stem cells (Fig. 4A) (McKearin and Spradling, 1990). In enc ovaries, the bam-expressing region was significantly expanded to approximately double the width (Fig. 4B). Since the pattern of bam expression is affected, enc has a role early in cyst development. In addition, we can conclude that enc is a negative regulator of bam in these additional bam-expressing cells. bam acts as a dominant suppressor of enc We constructed double mutants between bam and enc to place enc action relative to bam. Mutations in bam result in the production of tumorous egg chambers containing small, mitotically active cells. Previous studies have revealed that bam mutant germ cells are found as single cells or pairs of cells Fig. 4. Expression of bam transcript in wild-type and mutant germaria detected by whole-mount in situ hybridization. (A) A wildtype germarium. (B) Germarium derived from encQ4/Df(3L)A466 female. An expansion of bam expression was also observed in other strong enc allele combinations. Ovaries were photographed at the same magnification. 286 N. C. Hawkins, J. Thorpe and T. Schüpbach Fig. 5. The phenotype of bam and bam enc mutants is identical. (A,B) Egg chambers photographed under phase contrast optics. (A) A tumorous bam∆86/bam∆86 egg chamber. (B) A tumorous encR1 bam∆86/encR1 bam∆86 egg chamber. (C-E) Confocal images of mutant germ cells labelled with rhodamineconjugated phalloidin to visulize actin (red) and YoPro to stain DNA (green). Both bam∆86/bam∆86 (C) and encR1 bam∆86/encR1 bam∆86 (D) cells possess a single actin rich structure associated with the cell membrane (arrow). (E) A pair of encR1 bam∆86/encR1 bam∆86 cells connected by an actin rich structure (arrow). Scale bar, (A,B) 10 µm, (C-E) 2.5 µm. necessary for the extra round of mitosis and that the double mutant phenotype is revealing an epistatic relationship between the two genes. This possibility was strongly supported by the observation that a null allele of bam behaves as a dominant suppressor of enc. At 25˚C, 79% of the egg chambers from encR1/Df and 66% of the egg chambers from encBB/Df females exhibit a doubling in the nurse cell number. When the dosage of bam is reduced by one copy using a null allele of bam, the phenotype is greatly suppressed. Only 15% of the encR1 bam/Df egg chambers and 5% of the encBBbam/Df egg chambers have undergone an extra division (Fig. 6). This suppression is alleviated by reintroducing a wild-type copy of bam as a trans gene, thus conclusively demonstrating that the suppression is due to bam and not to a closely linked suppressor (data not shown). Since a bam mutation dominantly suppresses the mitotic defect of enc, this result suggests that the misexpression of bam RNA that is observed in enc might be a cause rather than a consequence of the extra division. Requirement for enc in maintenance of oocyte identity Mutations in enc produce a second defect during oogenesis that 100.0 enc/Df Fig. 6. A comparison of the mutant enc bam/Df phenotype of enc in females that are either 75.0 wild type for bam (hatched) or carry one mutant copy of the bam 50.0 gene. The graph illustrates supression of two strong enc genotypes, 25.0 encR1/Df(3L)A466 and encBB/Df(3L)A466, by a null allele of bam, 0.0 bam∆86. The deficiency encR1 encBB uncovers enc but complements bam. For this experiment more than 300 egg chambers per genotype were scored. % mutant egg chambers connected by a single ring canal, possibly arrested at the cystoblast or two cell cyst stage of development (McKearin and Christerson, 1994). The expansion of bam expression in enc indicates that there might be a requirement for enc early in the normal division program. Thus, we reasoned that if the encinduced extra division occurred before the arrest point for bam mutant cells, enc bam cysts might contain more than the 1 or 2 cells observed in the bam single mutant. The double mutant phenotype was indistinguishable from the bam mutant phenotype. Ovaries derived from the enc-bam double mutant contain tumorous egg chambers that appear to be identical to the bam mutant alone (Fig. 5A,B). To determine if the germ cells had progressed past the 1 or 2 cell cyst stage in the double mutant, egg chambers were stained with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin to visualize ring canals. In ovaries derived from both bam and the enc-bam double mutant, each germ cell has a single focus of phalloidin staining associated with the cell membrane (Fig. 5C,D). In addition, a small fraction of cells from both genotypes appear to be connected by an actin-rich structure (Fig. 5E). This could potentially be a immature ring canal suggesting that the mutant germ cells are arrested at the two cell cyst stage. However, the majority of cells are seen as single cells and not pairs of cells. McKearin and Ohlstein (1995) have recently proposed that the division of bam germ cells might be complete but that the division is accompanied by the transient formation of a ring canal. Therefore, the focus of phallodin staining might be a remnant of this ring canal. Alternatively, this structure might be associated with the spectrosome. However, the spectrosome has not been shown to contain actin and it is a cytoplasmic structure (Lin et al., 1994). Regardless of the identity of this single actin rich structure, the phenotype of the double mutant is identical to the bam single mutant phenotype at this enhanced level of resolution. There are two interpretations for this result. It is possible that the extra division produced by enc mutations occurs after bam arrests cyst development. Therefore, in a bam mutant development does not proceed far enough to see the effect of enc. A more exciting interpretation is that enc mutations require bam activity to produce an extra round of mitosis. In light of the expansion of bam transcription in an enc mutant, it is tempting to speculate that the misexpression of bam is encore and germ line mitosis indicates a role for enc in the process of oocyte determination. In wild-type egg chambers, the nurse cell nuclei become highly polyploid and have a large roughened appearance while the diploid oocyte nucleus at the posterior pole of the egg chamber remains small and smooth (Fig. 7A). Many of the enc alleles produce a large fraction of egg chambers in which the oocyte nucleus has an abnormal morphology. There is a range in the severity of this phenotype. Frequently, the oocyte nucleus appears to be moderately increased in size and no longer smooth in appearance (Fig. 7B). Occasionally, an ‘oocyte’ nucleus is seen that is almost identical in size and morphology to the nurse cell nuclei (Fig. 7C). Although the nucleus of the oocyte closely resembles a nurse cell nucleus the cell retains many features of an oocyte. It grows in size, accumulates yolk and induces the overlying follicle cells to become columnar. Finally, egg chambers are observed that appear to have 16 nurse cells and no oocyte. They assume a spindle like shape and eventually degenerate prior to vitellogenesis. This oocyte nucleus defect occurs primarily when females are raised at 18˚C. The strongest allele for this phenotype is encD6. At 18˚C, >90% of the egg chambers derived from encD6 homozygotes contain an enlarged oocyte nucleus and few post vitellogenic egg chambers are seen, while at 25˚C, this defect is rarely seen (<5%). In addition, this phenotype is seen almost exclusively in egg chambers that have not undergone an extra round of mitosis. This is particularly evident in examining encBB homozygotes at 18˚C in which 38% of the egg chambers have undergone an extra round of mitosis. The oocyte nucleus in these egg chambers has a normal appearance. However, of the remaining egg chambers which have the correct number of nurse cells, approximately 65% have an oocyte nucleus defect. 287 Since this defect appears to be cold sensitive, unlike the mitotic defect which is temperature sensitive, and occurs in egg chambers that have not undergone an extra division, we conclude that this represents a second, independent requirement for enc during oogenesis. To determine if the abnormal morphology of the oocyte nucleus is due to endoreplication, egg chambers were stained with Hoechst to examine the polyploidization of the germline nuclei. In wild-type egg chambers, the diploid oocyte nucleus appears as a tiny fluorescent dot, while the nurse cell nuclei are large and intensely stained (Fig. 7D). In enc, there is a range in the degree of endoreplication of the ooctye nucleus. In some instances, the oocyte nucleus is larger than a wild-type oocyte nucleus but is still clearly distinguishable from the nurse cell nuclei (Fig. 7E). In the most severe cases, egg chambers have a 16 nurse cell phenotype in which it is not possible to unambiguously distinguish the oocyte nucleus from the nurse cell nuclei (Fig. 7F). In order to further investigate the role of enc in oocyte determination, we examined the distribution of oskar (osk) RNA, which is enriched in the oocyte. In wild-type egg chambers, osk is synthesized in the nurse cells and accumulates in the developing oocyte in the germarium and remains concentrated in the oocyte of developing egg chambers (Fig. 8A) (Ephrussi et al., 1991; Kim-Ha et al., 1991). In all the enc alleles examined, the early localization of osk is normal. It accumulates in the oocyte in the germarium and remains localized in early stage egg chambers. However, in many enc egg chambers at approximately stages 4-5 the oocyte-specific accumulation disappears and the entire egg chamber shows weak uniform staining (Fig. 8B). This disruption of osk localization correlates Fig. 7. Defect in the morphology of the oocyte nucleus in egg chambers derived from enc females raised at 18˚C. (A-C) Photographed with Nomarski optics. (D-F) Stained with Hoescht to visualize nuclei. (A) A wild-type egg chamber containing a small, smooth diploid oocyte nucleus. (B) An encUU3/Df(3L)A466 egg chamber in which the oocyte nucleus is enlarged in size and has acquired a roughened appearance. (C) An encOO6/Df(3L)A466 egg chamber in which the oocyte contains an enlarged oocyte nucleus closely resembling a nurse cell nucleus but has still accumulated yolk. (D) A wild-type egg chamber in which the oocyte nucleus is a barely visible fluorescent dot. (E) A encOO6/ Df(3L)A466 egg chamber containing a polyploid oocyte nucleus whose ploidy lags behind that of its sibing nurse cells. (F) An egg chamber derived from encOO6/Df(3L)A466 in which the oocyte nucleus is indistinguishable from the nurse cell nuclei. Arrows indicate oocyte nuclei. 288 N. C. Hawkins, J. Thorpe and T. Schüpbach Fig. 8. Localization of oskar transcript in wild-type and enc mutant egg chambers derived from females raised at 18˚C. (A) In wild-type egg chambers, osk RNA is concentrated in the oocyte at the posterior pole. (B) In the encBB/encBB ovariole, the early localization of osk appears normal but then osk is distributed throughout the later stage egg chambers. The egg chambers with unlocalized osk had highly polyploid oocyte nuclei. (C) A encBB/encBBegg chamber in which osk appears to be localized normally. (D) Same egg chamber as in C stained with Hoecsht to visualize the nuclei. The oocyte nucleus is partially polyploid (arrow). with the presence of a polyploid oocyte nucleus. However, we have observed that an oocyte nucleus which is only partially polyploid may still retain localized osk. (Fig. 8C,D). Thus, in addition to a requirement for enc in regulating cystocyte divisions, it is also necessary for proper oocyte differentation. In enc mutants, the appearance of polyploid oocyte nuclei which lose the ability to accumulate osk suggests that there is a switch from an oocyte to a nurse cell developmental fate. DISCUSSION We have identified a new locus, enc, that is required for the proper formation of the egg chamber. Females mutant for enc produce egg chambers with extra nurse cells. A quantitative analysis revealed that enc egg chambers exhibit a doubling in the number of germline cells. Although enc egg chambers contain twice the normal number of germline cells, only a single oocyte develops. We have shown that the oocyte now possesses five ring canals instead of four. Since the oocyte develops from one of two cells with the maximum number of rings canals instead of a cell with four ring canals, it is not the absolute number of ring canals that is a determining factor in oocyte identity. Previously, it has been observed that oocytes could develop from cystocytes with fewer than four ring canals (Yue and Spradling, 1992). However, this is the first demonstration that more than four ring canals are compatible with oocyte development. The exact doubling in the number of germline cells, and the presence of an additional ring canal on the oocyte has led us to conclude that the enc phenotype is due to one extra round of mitosis in the germline. Therefore, enc appears to be required to regulate the number of cystocyte divisions. The enc phenotype is unique. No other mutations have been isolated that result in precisely one extra round of mitosis in the germline. Mutations in genes that may have a role in regulating germline mitosis such as hu-li tai shao (hts) and bam produce phenotypes very distinct from enc. Mutations in hts result in egg chambers with too few nurse cells, which rarely develop an oocyte, while mutations in bam produce an ovarian tumor phenotype (Yue and Spradling, 1992; McKearin and Spradling, 1990). In contrast, an extra nurse cell phenotype is produced by mutations in the genes brainiac (brn), Notch (N), Delta (Dl) and pipsqueak (psq), however, the mechanism involved is different from enc. This group of mutants affect follicle cell populations necessary for the correct separation of adjacent 16 cell cysts, resulting in egg chambers containing multiple 16 cell cysts (Goode et al., 1992; Ruohola et al., 1991; Siegel et al., 1993). Unlike enc, the total number of nurse cells in these compound egg chambers is variable and additional oocytes often develop. We have shown that bipolar egg chambers, which are most prevalent in the original P-element insertion allele encBB, also have a doubling in the number of germline cells. In these egg chambers, the oocyte also has 5 ring canals. Thus, the bipolar phenotype does not arise from a defect in oocyte specification. Instead, there is an inability of the oocyte to assume its correct position at the posterior pole of the egg chamber. In the bipolar egg chambers, the oocyte might be impeded from assuming its correct position in the egg chamber due to the presence of extra nurse cells. However, in certain enc allele combinations that produce almost 100% extra nurse cell egg chambers, the frequency of bipolar egg chambers is very low; generally less than 1%. Even for encBB, the frequency of this class varies depending on genetic background. Thus, enc is not likely to be directly involved in positioning of the oocyte. Mutations in enc also produce egg chambers with a reduction in the number of nurse cells. Like the bipolar class, this phenotype was most frequent in the original P-element induced allele, encBB, but was also observed at a frequency of approximately 1% in the outcrossed encBB line and the EMS induced alleles. We have determined that the reduction in the number of germline cells is not due to a decrease in number of cystocyte divisions. Instead, this phenotype appears to be due to a mispackaging by the follicle cells of a small group of nurse cells that were originally derived from a cyst that had undergone an extra round of mitosis. All the enc alleles are temperature sensitive for the mitotic defect. This high incidence of temperature sensitive alleles is highly unusual. It has been estimated that on average only 510% of EMS induced mutations are temperature sensitive (Grigliatti, 1986). It would be remarkable if all the enc alleles resulted in thermolabile proteins. More likely, enc could be participating in an intrinsically temperature sensitive process. This hypothesis is supported by the occurrence of temperature encore and germ line mitosis sensitive mutations in at least three other genes required for cyst formation; ovarian tumor (otu), fs(1)1621 (=san fille) and fs(2)B (=fes) (King, 1970; Gollin and King, 1981; Storto and King, 1988). In the case of otu, 15 alleles were shown to be temperature sensitive. From our genetic analysis it remains unclear if any of our enc alleles are null. We have generated both loss-of-function and recessive gain-of-function alleles which produce an identical phenotype, one extra round of mitosis in the germline. The main difference between these two groups of alleles is the penetrance of the phenotype. The loss-of-function alleles are relatively weak, while the gain-of-function alleles produce nearly 100% mutant egg chambers as homozygotes. We have classified the gain-of-function alleles as recessive antimorphs since the phenotype of these alleles improves when placed in trans to a deficiency. The relatively weak phenotype produced by the loss-of-function alleles suggests that enc function might be partially redundant and that the antimorphic alleles produce a ‘poison’ product that antagonizes a wild-type pathway resulting in a stronger phenotype. The mitotic defect of enc appears to be mediated through its effect on bam expression. In wild-type ovaries, bam transcript is detected in the cystobast and 2 cell cysts (McKearin and Spradling, 1990). In enc ovaries, we have shown that the domain of bam expression is significantly expanded. This expansion of bam expression could merely be the consequence of early changes in cell fate due to the reiteration of the stem cell to cystoblast division or the cystoblast to two cell cyst division. This might result in additional cells having acquired a cystoblast or 2 cell cyst fate and as a consequence express bam transcript. However, since a null allele of bam acts as a dominant suppressor of the enc mitotic defect, the misexpression of bam transcript is not simply a consequence of the extra division but is required to produce the extra division. We can propose two models which could account for the alteration in the pattern of bam expression. In the first model, enc may be acting as a negative regulator of bam transcription. This could occur in two ways. In enc mutants, bam could now be expressed in later stage cystocytes, such as 4, 8 or 16 cell cysts. Alternatively, the level of transcription from the cystoblast and 2 cell cysts may be elevated and thus detectable levels of transcript may be present longer. In a second model, enc could be required in the regulated turnover of bam message. If bam message stability was increased, the transcript could persist longer and this might be visualized as a wider domain of bam staining by in situ hybridization. We propose that, regardless of the molecular mechanism, the expansion of bam transcript could result in an increase in Bam protein levels and that the subsequent increase in Bam protein could be responsible for the extra round of mitosis observed in enc mutants. Although the first detectable effect of enc mutations is on the expression of bam transcript early in the division program, an increase in Bam protein may result in the extra division being added onto the end of the normal division program. In a wild-type germarium, Bam protein is detected in two subcellular locations, the cytoplasm and the fusome (McKearin and Ohlstein, 1995). The cytoplasmic form of Bam, BamC, is found in the mitotically active 2, 4 and 8 cell cysts and is degraded in the 16 cell cyst. McKearin and Ohlstein (1995) have postulated that the degradation of Bam in the 16 cell cyst may signal the cyst to 289 withdraw from the cell cycle. In enc, an increase in the levels of BamC might result in one extra round of mitosis. Alternatively, increasing the fusomal component of Bam, BamF, might drive the 16 cell cyst through an additional cell cycle since the fusome has been postulated to play a role in cyst formation (Lin et al., 1994; Telfer, 1975). However, the presence of the fusome does not precisely correlate with mitotically active cystocytes. It still persists in region 2 of the germarium after the 16 cell cyst has ceased division. An analysis of Bam protein in enc mutants should help in distinguishing between these possibilities. It is unknown whether there is an internal counting mechanism, possibly some tritratable factor, or signals from the soma that instructs the 16 cell cyst to withdraw from the cell cycle and begin differentiation. Since BamC is present in mitotically active cysts and is degraded in 16 cell cysts it is tempting to speculate that Bam might be part of some titratable counting mechanism whose levels are regulated by enc. In addition to enc’s role in germline mitosis, we have shown that there is a second requirement for enc during oogenesis in the process of oocyte differentiation. In wild-type egg chambers, the oocyte nucleus is arrested in meiosis I with a DNA content of 4C, while the nurse cell nuclei begin endoreplication as the cyst exits the germarium. In enc mutants, we have shown that the oocyte frequently acquires a partial nurse cell identity in that the oocyte nucleus undergoes endoreplication. Usually the extent of endoreplication lags behind that of the adjacent nurse cell nuclei, though egg chambers were observed in which the oocyte nucleus was indistinguishable from the nurse cell nuclei. This phenotype is similar to that produced by a small subset of ovarian tumor (otu) alleles that allow formation of a nurse cell/oocyte syncytium. Storto and King (1988) observed oocytes derived from weak otu alleles in which the oocyte nucleus had undergone endoreplication. Like enc, the extent of endoreplication of the oocyte lagged behind that of its sibling nurse cells. Two other genes have been identified that are required for oocyte determination. Females mutant for recessive alleles in Bicaudal-D (Bic-D) or egalitarian (egl) produce egg chambers comprising 16 nurse cells and no oocyte (Schüpbach and Wieschaus, 1991; Suter et al., 1989). Egg chambers develop until mid oogenesis and then degenerate prior to vitellogenesis. In contrast to Bic-D and egl, none of the enc alleles produce a completely penetrant phenotype for this defect although the strongest allele, encD6, produces very few post vitellogenic egg chambers and results in no eggs being laid. Many other enc alleles produce an intermediate phenotype in which post vitellogenic egg chambers are observed with a polyploid oocyte nucleus. Since this phenotype is less penetrant than in Bic-D or egl, enc might be involved in the maintenance of oocyte identity as opposed to the initial establishment of oocyte identity. A role for maintenance of oocyte identity, as opposed to the initial establishment of oocyte identity, was also suggested from an examination of osk localization in enc egg chambers. We observed that osk was localized normally in the germarium and early stage egg chambers, then at slightly later stages, was often evenly distributed throughout the egg chamber. Therefore, certain aspects of oocyte determination appear initially to proceed normally, before the oocyte switches to a nurse cell developmental fate. Hypomorphic 290 N. C. Hawkins, J. Thorpe and T. Schüpbach alleles of Bic-D exhibit a similar pattern of osk localization in which osk was localized normally in the germarium and early stage egg chambers (Suter and Steward, 1991). However, in null alleles of Bic-D , there was no oocytespecific accumulation of osk (Ran et al., 1994). Since we do not know whether we have isolated a null allele of enc, we cannot rule out the possibility that enc, like Bic-D and egl, is required for the initial establishment of oocyte identity as well as for its maintenance. The role of enc in oocyte determination appears to represent an independent requirement for enc and is not simply a secondary consequence of the mitotic defect. Two lines of evidence support this assumption. First, the oocyte nucleus defect occurs almost exclusively in egg chambers that have not undergone an extra round of mitosis. Second, this phenotype is cold sensitive, unlike the mitotic defect, which is temperature sensitive. enc therefore has at least two separable functions in oogenesis. It is required for the regulation of germline mitosis and it is subsequently involved in the process of oocyte differentiation. We thank Rob Jackson, Jim Garbe, Stephen Harrison and Dennis McKearin for providing stocks and Dennis McKearin for communicating results prior to publication. We thank Cheryl VanBuskirk for assistance with the oskar in situs and stimulating discussions. We acknowledge Joseph Goodhouse, of the department’s Confocal/E.M. Core Facility, for his expert technical assistance with confocal microscopy and helping with the computer graphics in the preparation of Figs 3 and 5. We are grateful to Robert Ray, Christopher Beh, Elizabeth Gavis and Ken Irvine for critical reading of the manuscript and members of the Schüpbach lab, especially Siegfried Roth and Robert Ray, for stimulating discussions. We thank Gordon Gray for the preparation of fly food. This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and by the Public Health Service Grant GM40558 to T. S. REFERENCES Ashburner, M. (1989). Drosophila: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Bier, E., Vassin, H., Shepherd, S., Lee, K., McCall, K., Barbel, S., Ackerman, L., Carretto, R., Uemura, T., Grell, E., Yan, L. Y. and Yan, Y. N. (1989). Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector. Genes Dev. 3, 1273-1287. Ephrussi, A., Dickson, L. K. and Lehmann, R. (1991). oskar organizes the germ plasm and directs localization of the posterior determinant nanos. Cell 66, 37-50. Gollin, S. M. and King, R. C. (1981). Studies of fs(1)1621, a mutation producing ovarian tumors in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Genet. 2, 203218. Gonzalez-Reyes, A. and St Johnston, D. (1994). Role of oocyte position in establishment of anterior-posterior polarity in Drosophila. Science 266, 639642. Goode, S., Wright, D. and Mahowald, A. P. (1992). The neurogenic locus brainiac cooperates with the Drosophila EGF receptor to establish the ovarian follicle and to determine its dorsal-ventral polarity. Development 116, 177-192. Grigliatti, T. (1986). Mutagenesis. In Drosophila. A Practical Approach, (ed. D. B. Roberts), pp. 39-58, Washington DC: IRL Press. Harrison, S. D., Solomon, N. and Rubin, G. M. (1995). A genetic analysis of the 63E-64A genomic region of Drosophila melanogaster: identification of mutations in a replication factor C subunit. Genetics 139, 1701-1709. Kim-Ha, J., Smith, J. L. and Macdonald, P. M. (1991). oskar mRNA is localized to the posterior pole of the Drosophila oocyte. Cell 66, 23-35. King, R. C. (1970). Ovarian Development in Drosophila melanogaster, New York: Academic Press. Kulkarni, S. J., Newby, L. M. and Jackson, F. R. (1994). Drosophila GABAergic systems. II. Mutational analysis of chromosomal segment 64AB, a region containing the glutamic acid decarboxylase gene. Mol. Gen. Genet. 243, 555-564. Lin, H., Yue, L. and Spradling, A. C. (1994). The Drosophila fusome, a germline-specific organelle, contains membrane skeletal proteins and functions in cyst formation. Development 120, 947-956. Lindsley, D. L. and Zimm, G. G. (1992). The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster, San Diego: Academic Press. Lohs-Schardin, M. (1982). A Drosophila mutant affecting polarity in follicle organization and embryonic patterning. Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol. 191, 2836. Mahowald, A. P. and Kambysellis, M. P. (1980). Oogenesis. In The Genetic and Biology of Drosophila, (ed. M. Ashburner), pp. 141-224, New York: Academic Press. McKearin, D. M. and Spradling, A. C. (1990). bag-of-marbles: a Drosophila gene required to initiate both male and female gametogenesis. Genes Dev. 4, 2242-2251. McKearin, D. M. and Christerson, L. (1994). Molecular genetics of early germ cell differentiation during Drosophila oogenesis. In CIBA Foundation Symposium: Germline Development, (ed. J. Marsh and J. Goode), pp. 210222. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. McKearin, D. and Ohlstein, B. (1995). The Drosophila Bag-of-marbles protein is required for the choice between stem cell and cystoblast cell mitosis. Development 121, 2937-2947. Pauli, D. and Mahowald, A. P. (1990). Germ-line sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Trends Genet. 6, 259-264. Ran, B., Bopp, R. and Suter, B. (1994). Null alleles reveal novel requirements for Bic-D during Drosophila oogenesis and zygotic development. Development 120, 1233-1242. Robertson, H. M., Preston, C. R., Phillis, R. W., Johnson-Schlitz, D. M., Benz, W. K. and Engels, W. R. (1988). A stable source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 118, 461-470. Ruohola, H., Bremer, K. A., Baker, D., Swedlow, J. R., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1991). Role of neurogeneic genes in establishment of follicle cell fate and oocyte polarity during oogenesis in Drosophila. Cell 66, 433449. Schüpbach, T. and Wieschaus, E. (1991). Female sterile mutations on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutations blocking oogenesis or altering egg morphology. Genetics 129, 1119-1136. Siegel, V., Jongens, T. A., Jan, L. Y. and Yan, Y. N. (1993). pipsqueak, an early acting member of the posterior group of genes, affects vasa level and germ cell-somatic interaction in the developing egg chamber. Development 119, 1187-1202. Spradling, A. C. (1993). Developmental genetics of oogenesis. In Drosophila Development (ed. M. Bate and A. Martinez Arias), pp. 1-70. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Steinmann-Zwicky, M. (1992). How do germ cells choose their sex? Drosophila as a paradigm. BioEssays 14, 513-518. Storto, P. D. and King, R. C. (1988). Multiplicity of functions for the otu gene products during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev. Genet. 9, 91-120. Storto, P. D. and King, R. C. (1989). The role of polyfusomes in generating branched chains of cystocytes during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev. Genet. 10. 70-86. Suter, B. S., Romberg, L. M. and Steward, R. (1989). Bicaudal-D. A Drosophila gene involved in developmental asymmetry: localized transcript accumulation in ovaries and sequence similarity to myosin heavy chain tail domains. Genes Dev. 3, 1957-1968. Suter, B. and Steward, R. (1991). Requirement for phosophorylation and localization of the Bicaudal-D protein in Drosophila oocyte differentation. Cell 67, 917-926. Tautz, D. and Pfeifle, C. (1989). A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 92, 81-85. Telfer, W. H. (1975). Development and physiology of the oocyte-nurse cell syncytium. Adv. Insect Physiol. 11, 223-319. Wohlwill, A. D. and Jose Bonner, J. (1991). Genetic analysis of chromosome region 63 of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 128, 763-775. Yue, L. and Spradling, A. C. (1992). hu-li-tai shao, a gene required for ring canal formation during Drosophila oogenesis, encodes a homolog of adducin. Genes Dev. 6, 2443-2454. (Accepted 13 October 1995)