Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
MEDIA RELEASE Thursday 30 April, 2015 Consumer health needs must be the first concern in PBS reforms, say peak health groups Four national health groups have joined forces to urge the Federal Health Minister to assess the health and economic impacts of changes to pharmaceutical subsidies before implementing new measures. The Consumers Health Forum, Arthritis Australia, Painaustralia and the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia say changes as currently proposed would significantly disadvantage more than one million Australians living with arthritis and other chronic conditions requiring frequent medication. The Health Minister, Sussan Ley, has foreshadowed significant changes to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme including the introduction of a discount of up to $1 on the co-payment for prescription medicines and the removal from the PBS of a range of over the counter medicines including analgesics.This comes when there is a separate move to introduce doctors’ prescriptions for some pain killers currently available over the counter at pharmacies. There is also continuing speculation about a possible increased co-payment for prescribed medicines. The chief executive officer of CHF, Leanne Wells, says: “We accept there is common sense in some of these measures and potential benefits for many consumers. But there is a need for a thorough assessment of what they will mean for health care overall. The first principle of health policy is that the patient has to come first. There are many people with chronic conditions for whom the changes will be a costly blow. While the minister has indicated savings would be reinvested in health care, it would be a retrograde step if these were at the expense of the chronically ill.” The plan to remove a range of Over the Counter medicines from the PBS, which are prescribed by doctors for specific conditions, is of major concern. The CEO of Arthritis Australia, Ainslie Cahill, says “Paracetamol is the first line treatment for osteoarthritis which affects 1.9 million Australians. The required quantity to allow a therapeutic dose currently costs a pensioner $6.10 from a pharmacy, if prescribed by a doctor. Under the scheme proposed by the Minister, the same therapeutic dose could cost the pensioner more than $45 to purchase multiple packets from a supermarket. Quite apart from the worrying cost impact to those with arthritis, there are major safety concerns. Increased cost would create an incentive for people to seek, and GPs to prescribe, the next line therapies for osteoarthritis which are PBS-listed, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, or opioids. These therapies however are associated with far less favourable safety profiles than paracetamol, especially for those who also suffer other chronic conditions. The situation we face highlights the need for more support in the health system for effective alternatives such as weight loss and strengthening exercises,” Ms Cahill says. The CEO of the PSA, Dr Lance Emerson, says that not only would it be more expensive, it would also take the GP and pharmacist out of the loop with regard to advising consumers on their therapy --- advice not available to consumers at the supermarket. The CEO of Painaustralia, Lesley Brydon, says a separate proposal to make the pain killer codeine a prescription-only drug was likely to prove counter-productive. “Such a measure, though it might be well-intentioned, will simply increase the load on already over-loaded GPs. It will potentially deny people access who cannot afford to go to a doctor --- and there are a great many such patients --- leaving them in pain. Having a national real-time monitoring scheme for designated medications including codeine which are sold in pharmacies would be a better way of curtailing overuse and abuse. We desperately need a national media education campaign about quality use of medicine for pain,” Ms Brydon says. The four leaders say another side-effect of the removal of analgesics from the PBS would be the impact on high-need individuals and families as these medications when prescribed count towards their Safety Net, critically important for low-income families and those with chronic illnesses. “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people may also be particularly impacted by these changes, as items not on the PBS do not qualify for the Government’s own Close the Gap measures. “As to the overall impact of the proposed changes, there is the potential for conflicting outcomes resulting from the-copayment changes which we fear could lead to great inequity. Their impact must be carefully examined before proceeding.” “We need to remember that Australia’s per capita health care spending on access to medicines is below the OECD average. “The community needs clarity on these issues. We need to be working together to improve consumers’ health and maintain safety, quality and standards, in addition to achieving a sustainable and viable health system,” the four leaders said. Media contacts: Franca Marine Arthritis Australia 0432567413 Mark Metherell CHF 0429111986