Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Financial economics wikipedia , lookup
Systemic risk wikipedia , lookup
Stock trader wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission wikipedia , lookup
Financial literacy wikipedia , lookup
Systemically important financial institution wikipedia , lookup
Financial crisis wikipedia , lookup
FINAL WORD Financial Wellness is the Future BY GREG POLLOCK E very day, Canadians make decisions that can either set them up for financial success or failure. Major life events, such as the purchase of a new home, the arrival of a newborn baby, or sending kids off to college, can cause financial discomfort for a period of time. Yet, for some individuals, financial stress can be chronic. According to the latest Manulife Financial Wellness Index, two in five Canadians say they are financially unwell. Respondents were mostly concerned by debt (82 per cent), not saving for retirement (60 per cent), were stressed due to their financial situation (67 per cent), and were not financially prepared to protect their loved ones should an unexpected event such as death, disability, or serious illness occur (83 per cent). Financial wellness plays a significant role in our overall physical and emotional well-being. This is why professional financial advice is a key element of a holistic approach to health. The ongoing threat to access to financial advice should greatly concern Canadians of all ages. Those who have less money to invest, whether seniors on a fixed income or young people just starting to save for retirement, are most at risk of losing access should a ban on embedded commissions come to pass. You are likely aware that the Canadian Securities Administrators’ (CSA) new plans would require clients to pay their advisors directly. While their proposal is intended to protect consumers, we at Advocis have cautioned that moving in this direction will do more harm than good in the immediate and long-term. The effects will not only be felt by average citizens, but also by the economy and healthcare system, to an extent. Many financial advisors are small- and medium-sized business owners and are a significant part of the overall finance and insurance industry. Their total direct and indirect economic impact is about 1.4 per cent of total Canadian GDP (approximately $25 billion). Consequently, regulation that reduces access to financial advice hurts our country’s growth. The CSA’s consultation period ends next month, and we hope that discussions continue into the summer so investors’ viewpoints may come to the forefront. Right now, it’s crucial that Canadian investors speak to their MPPs and MLAs. If your clients want to retain choice in how they pay for financial advice, they need to let their local politicians know. If you haven’t already done so, please encourage your clients to visit FinancialAdviceForAll.ca and take action by sending an email to their MPP or MLA. It’s also important for you, as a financial advisor, to make your opinion known. We fully support fee transparency and disclosure. It’s not uncommon for investors to assume that financial advice is free because they pay through a commission. However, the purpose of CRM2 is to increase awareness regarding fees. Investors need to understand how much they are paying, but this doesn’t mean they should be stripped of their choice in how they pay for financial advice. A new American study by JD Power, which surveyed 1,000 investors about the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule, found that most investors who pay commissions do not want to switch to feebased structures on their retirement accounts. These findings are similar to what we discovered in our own 2015 investor study where we surveyed more than 1,500 clients of Advocis members. When asked if they would prefer that the government leave the choice to them whether they pay an hourly fee, an embedded fee, or a percentage of assets under management, 88 per cent responded “yes.” Compare this to the four per cent who responded they would prefer to pay an hourly fee of $150 to $350. It’s clear that investors would like to decide for themselves how they compensate their financial advisor, and tend to favour a commission structure. However, their preference continues to fall on deaf ears. Although this is a critical time, it’s also an opportunity for advisors to set themselves apart and show their value. One way to do this is through continuing education. With the summer months upon us, I encourage you to join us at one of three national schools in Kelowna, B.C., Banff, Alta., or Georgetown, PEI. It’s a fantastic opportunity to connect with your fellow Advocis members in a beautiful setting while gaining new business insights. It’s one of the year’s highlights, and you can earn up to 15 continuing education credits. Find out more at Advocis.ca/ALC. I wish you a happy and safe summer. Those who have less money to invest are most at risk of losing access should a ban on commissions come to pass. 34 FORUM MAY / JUNE 2017 GREG POLLOCK, CFP, is the president and CEO of Advocis.