* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture #2: Realism
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
POLI 101: Dec. 10, 2014 Lecture #18: International Politics Announcements First paper is on the question: “Which is a more compelling theory of International Politics, Realism or Liberalism?” There will be some additional reading on the website, you will have three weeks. No Class this Thursday (3/2) or next Thursday (3/9) Watch the two remaining parts of “Commanding Heights”, episodes 2 and 3 Paradigms in International Politics Realism Balance of power theory Human nature as basically hostile Liberalism Liberal institutionalism Human nature as basically peaceful Realism & International Politics There is less in the way of “politics” done at the international than domestic level. Taxation, social programs, abortion, national defense, etc… are all overwhelmingly decided nationally. The “politics” of the international sphere have been primarily limited to issues of war and trade. International State of Nature International scene traditionally been considered a “Hobbesian” world. State of nature leading to potential state of war. Who is Hobbes? What does it mean to say something is Hobbesian? War of all against all Justice is imaginary without law There is no law Power rules the day Realism in international relations Those who argue that the international world is “Hobbesian” in the sense that we have studied it here are called “realists”. Realists argue that the international world is anarchic. There is no world government to govern affairs between states and to enforce justice States are self-interested Countries act to secure that which is in the national interest Therefore power determines the relationship between independent states. Is this true? Thucydides Let us turn to Thucydides: Historian, General, Athenian, Quote Machine “Most people, in fact, will not take the trouble in finding out the truth, but are much more inclined to accept the first story they hear.” “We Greeks believe that a man who takes no part in public affairs is not merely lazy, but good for nothing” “In a democracy . . . someone who fails to get elected to office can always console himself with the thought that there was something not quite fair about it.” “History is philosophy teaching by example” Realism in History Peloponnesian War Athens v. Sparta Rivalry born of the fallout of the Persian war Athenian Empire v. Peloponnesian alliance According to ancient historian Thucydides, war is fundamentally about power and fear. “The growth of the power of Athens, and the alarm which this inspired in Sparta, made war inevitable.” - Thucydides The Peloponnesian War Peloponnesian War Melos Melians were of the same ethnic group as the Spartans (Dorians), they chose to remain neutral in the war. Athens invaded Melos in 416 BC in the middle of the Peloponnesian War, demanded the Melians surrender and pay tribute to Athens, or face annihilation. The “Melian Dialogue” is an account of the diplomatic confrontation to discuss this. The Melian Dialogue Athenian: "For ourselves, we shall not trouble you with specious pretenses—either of how we have a right to our empire because we overthrew the Persian, or are now attacking you because of wrong that you have done us—and make a long speech which would not be believed; and in return we hope that you, instead of thinking to influence us by saying that you did not join the Spartans, although their colonists, or that you have done us no wrong, will aim at what is feasible, holding in view the real sentiments of us both; since you know as well as we do that right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must." The Melian Dialogue Melians: "You may be sure that we are as well aware as you of the difficulty of contending against your power and fortune, unless the terms be equal. But we trust that the gods may grant us fortune as good as yours, since we are just men fighting against unjust, and that what we want in power will be made up by the alliance of the Spartans, who are bound, if only for very shame, to come to the aid of their kindred. Our confidence, therefore, after all is not so utterly irrational." The Melian Dialogue Athenian: "Of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not as if we were the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found it existing before us, and shall leave it to exist forever after us; all we do is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we have, would do the same as we do" The Melian Dialogue Athenians urge the Melians to surrender or be destroyed. Melians argue that right and justice are on their side, and they therefore choose not to surrender. Athenians lay siege to Melos, take it, kill all the men, and sell the women and children into slavery. “So far as right and wrong are concerned…there is no difference between the two.” –Thucydides According to realists, claims of justice are irrelevant in the international sphere. It is power that determines the relationship between states. “The powerful do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must.” Central Assumptions International politics is anarchic Without law, predisposed toward conflict States are the central actors Think of the Treaty of Westphalia States control domestic affairs, i.e. corporations, NGOs, religions, citizens, etc… States are unitary actors They have coherent interests States are “rational” They calculate costs/benefits and seek national interest Security Dilemma/Prisoner’s Dilemma Collective Action Problems If realism is correct, we would expect some collective action problems. Collective Action Problems Prisoner’s Dilemma – Arms Race Common Pool Resources – Global Warming Concentrated benefits and diffuse costs – Failure of League of Nations Variants of Realism Balance of Power Theory World likely to move towards distribution of power among powerful states Weaker states fear powerful, gang up to balance USA vs. China vs. Russia vs. EU vs. Japan Hegemonic Stability Theory Stability achieved through dominance of hegemon Pax Romana, Pax Britannica, Pax Americana Predicts that when hegemons lose power, revolutionary powers cause trouble because they do not accept the status quo. War ahead…???