Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Functional materials from cellulose: tissue scaffolds, formulation ingredients and printed materials Janet L. Scott ChemSpec June 2016, Basel … or how to turn into Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies 1. delicate cellulose hydrogel based scaffolds for tissue engineering; 2. particulate rheology modifiers and emulsion stabilisers that are effective at low weight percent inclusion in aqueous (and other) formulations; and 3. robust, flame retardant composites in a range of formats from beads to sheets. Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Cellulose based scaffolds for tissue engineering Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Cellulose as a tissue scaffold material? • Biocompatible • Foreign body reaction is relatively mild1 • Oxidised cellulose is bioresorbable2 • Not animal derived • No opportunity for contamination, e.g. with prions • Doesn’t offend religious or personal sensibilities • Can be formed into scaffolds • Films (2D) / Hydrogels and sculpted shapes (3D) Challenge: cellulose is a hydrophilic material with low adsorption; mammalian cells do not 1.non-specific T. Miyamoto, et al.,protein J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 1989, 23, 125-133 2. US 6500777, Bioresorbable oxidized cellulose composite …,surfaces Ethicon, 2002 readily attach to cellulose Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Cellulose is readily functionalised Oxidation – negatively charged surface Substitution – positively charged surface Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Characterisation: conductometric titration and ss NMR [ppm] 1H – 13C CP MAS @ 10 kHz with a contact time of 2000 µs (300 MHz solid –state NMR) Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Cell attachment 100 Cell attachment / % 90 80 Cells attached to cationic cellulose Cellulose films Cellulose films + FBS Cellulose films + RGD 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 400 µm 0 Unmodified Cell attachment (%) = Cationic Anionic No. of cells on scaffold × 100 Seeding density Solution: surface modification (cationic) promotes cell attachment without mediation by added proteins UK Patent Application No. 1607802.4; J.C. Courtenay, M.A. Johns, F. Galembeck, C. Deneke, E.M. Lanzoni, C.A. Costa, J.L. Scott, R.I. Sharma, Biomaterials, 2016, submitted Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Cell spreading on scaffolds MG63 cell circularity 1 1h - Circularity 24 h - Circularity Cationic cellulose = 1h 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Cationic cellulose = 24h 0 Control Unmodified 0.6 DS 4.7 DS 9.2 DS Scaffold Circularity = 4π (Area)/ (Perimeter)2 Cell circularity factor = measure of spreading 1 = cell is circular, 0 = cell is spreading Blue = cell nucleus Green = cell membrane Blue = cell nucleus Green = cell membrane Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Cells attach and spread on cationised cellulose without intervention of proteins or ligands Cellulose scaffold bearing positive surface charge Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Bacterial cellulose films with modified surfaces 400 nm 400 nm 400 nm Surface topography inferred from tip amplitude measurements in electrostatic force microscopy (1 µm2 sample) UK Patent Application No. 1607802.4; J.C. Courtenay, M.A. Johns, F. Galembeck, C. Deneke, E.M. Lanzoni, C.A. Costa, J.L. Scott, R.I. Sharma, Biomaterials, 2016, submitted Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Capacitive coupling (dC/dz) Anionic Unmodified 2.5 Cationic Distribution of dC/dz / AU Unmodified Anionic Cationic 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 Capacitive coupling, dC/dz / AU 8.0 UK Patent Application No. 1607802.4; J.C. Courtenay, M.A. Johns, F. Galembeck, C. Deneke, E.M. Lanzoni, C.A. Costa, J.L. Scott, R.I. Sharma, Biomaterials, 2016, submitted 10.0 Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Influence of degree of modification on dC/dz Capacitive coupling, dC/dz / AU 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Degree of Substitution / % Low degrees of modification promote cell attachment; scaffolds have the materials properties associated with cellulose, yet allow attachment without mediating proteins Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies More sophisticated scaffolds Not yet cleared for publication to be covered in lecture Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Cellulose based Formulation Ingredients: rheology modifiers and Pickering emulsions Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Nanofibrillar oxidized cellulose as a key formulation ingredient in greener personal care products ca 20 % of 1° alcohol oxidised oxidize & disperse formulate R. J. Crawford, K. J. Edler, S. Lindhoud, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 300-303 R. J. Crawford, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, PCT patent WO2010076292, 2010 Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Partially C(6) oxidised cellulose ca 20 % of 1° alcohol oxidised + + -+ + + - - + + -+ +- - -+ + +- + - + +- + + + - + --+ -+ + + +- -+ -+ + + - + Surfactant interactions? thixotropic gels Not dissolved! Well-dispersed fibrils with surface charge; bacterial cellulose X sodium carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC) hybrid Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Application in personal care products Rheology modifier in reduced surfactant formulations Creams / lotions oil in water emulsions Sprayable gels, including alcohol containing gels R. J. Crawford, K. J. Edler, S. Lindhoud, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 300-303 R. J. Crawford, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, PCT patent WO2010076292, 2010 J. L. Scott, C. Smith, G. Unali, PCT patent application WO2012171725, 2012 Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Sprayable gels - effect of alcohols on structure Gravimetric “gel content” Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Sprayable gels – effect of ethanol on structure Formation of sheetlike structures as alcohol content increases Best fit models to Ethanol SAXS data 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Elliptical cylinder X X X X X P P P P Minor radius / Å 18(1) 17(1) 18(1) 19(1) major/minor ratio 3(1) 3(1) 3(1) 2(1) Lamellar structure X X X X P P P P P bilayer thickness / Å 33(1) 35(1) 35(1) Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Change in gel structure - methanol Dispersed OC (0.8 g L-1), 40 mM SDS Supercritical drying after solvent exchange to methanol Dispersed OC (0.8 g L-1) Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Rheology modifier for API formulations • • • • • Stable and tolerant of alcohols Shear thinning (easy to apply or spray) Non-allergenic, non-irritant Non sticky with a pleasant “soft” skin feel Any advantages in API delivery through the skin? Porcine skin in vitro Cumulative ibuprofen released (mg/cm2) 5000 Cumulative ibuprofen permeated (mg/cm2) Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies A, A oxcell, 1% active Sainsbury's Market 1, HEC,Gel 5% active Ibuleve Market 2, carbomer, 5% active B A,Formulation oxcell, 1% active C B,Formulation oxcell, 1% active D C, Formulation oxcell, 1% active Formulation E D, oxcell, 1% active 600 400 200 0 0 2 4 6 8 Time (hr) data points slightly displaced on the time axis B, B oxcell, 1% active 4000 800 Ibuleve 1, HEC, 5% active Market Market 2, carbomer, 5% Sainsbury's active 3000 2000 1000 0 2 4 6 Time (hr) 8 Silicone membrane in vitro D. Celebi, R.H. Guy, K.J. Edler, J.L. Scott, Int, J Pharmaceutics, 2016, submitted Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Creams – particle stabilised O/W emulsions tetradecane / water plus dispersed oxidised cellulose 0 g/L • • • • oxidised cellulose Pickering emulsions Consistent droplet size Stable Pleasant tactile properties 15 g/L Emulsion stabiliser in creams and lotions J. L. Scott, C. Smith, G. Unali, PCT patent application WO2012171725, 2012. Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Creams – particle stabilised O/W emulsions Pickering emulsions freeze-dried hexane/water emulsion Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Oxidised cellulose – a versatile ingredient • • • • • • Simplified formulation “chassis” and reduced number of ingredients Good tactile properties – remarkable “skin feel” with no stickiness Versatile ingredient - sprayable lotions to spreadable creams Excellent emulsion stabilisation Maintains suspensions - no particulate settling Potential for use in mild skin treatment formulations Limitations • Tolerant of lower alcohols, but not glycerol • Incompatible with cationic surfactants (cationic particles?) … opportunity to use the same the principles to produce a cationic version Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Materials to Enable Electronics Recovery and Recycling Closed Loop Emotionally Valuable E-waste Recovery If the consumer is attached to the device’ appearance or feel They might be inclined to return it to the manufacturer for upgrade Upgraded device is immediately returned to the customer Allowing rapid exchange of superannuated hardware To recycling or material recovery Skeleton: the support components inside the device Skin Skin: the outer casing, or the part that the user interacts with directly Organs: the high-tech electronics that deliver the function Complete disassembly required to allow recovery of components and/or metals Skeleton requirements • Robust • Rigid / flexible • Non-conductive • Non-flammable • Smooth • Printable • Processible • Degradable (triggered) … CHEAP! rejected components recover valuable metals valuable components & elements recover valuable parts ??? decompose, skeleton Cellulose processing Surface treat recover ionic liquid Set and leach Cast / form Blend filler(s) Dissolve in IL Cellulose films – inorganic fillers Cellulose film from 15 wt % solution in ionic liquid (cross section) Cellulose film with 15 % filler from 15 wt % solution in ionic liquid (cross section) Cellulose films - fire retardant fillers Cellulose film 50 wt% fire retardant filler Cellulose film with increasing quantities of nanoclay filler 5 wt % 10 wt % 20 wt % Cellulose films – surface coated 117° 48 ° Cellulose film Cellulose film coated with hydrophobising agent ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate 58 ° Cellulose film + 10 wt % nanoclay 97 ° Cellulose film + 10 wt % nanoclay coated with hydrophobising agent Conductive ink printing cellulose films no filler untreated surface treated cellulose films with 20 % filler Transparent, fire retardant, printable, biodegradable cellulose films High filler content film Low filler content film particles too large – not transparent transparent surface suitable for conductive printing surface suitable for conductive printing reasonable flame retardancy good flame retardancy degradation w cellulases excellent degradation w cellulases Details not yet cleared for publication to be covered in lecture Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies Acknowledgements University of Bath: Professor Karen Edler Dr Saskia Lindhoud Dr Duygu Celebi, Yun Jin Professor Richard Guy Dr Ram Sharma Jamie Courtenay, Marcus Johns Reggie Wirawan University of Campinas, Brazil: Professor Fernando Galembeck LNNano, Brazil: Dr Christoph Deneke Dr Evandro M. Lanzoni and Dr Carlos A. Costa University of East Anglia Professor Yaroslav Kimyak Dr Susana Campos E Menezes Jorge Ramalhete CLEVER: Dr Debra Lilley, Alan Manley and Dr Grace Smalley, Loughborough University Dr Ben Bridgens and Dr Keertika Balasundaram, Newcastle University Dr Kersty Hobson, Cardiff University Dr Nicholas Lynch, University of Oxford Dr Janet L. Scott, Dr Saravanan Chandrasekaran, Dr Alvaro Cruz-Izquierdo, University of Bath Industrial: Unilever, Croda, Rockwood Additives (FR&SH, oxcell)