Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Low cost production of tetravalent dengue vaccine in tobacco chloroplasts Even S. Riiser1, Ingrid Holtsmark1, Hege S. Steen1, Sathyamangalam Swaminathan2, Navin Khanna2, Ralph Bock3, Jihong L. Clarke1 Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research Introduction compared to an estimated total of 2.5 billion globally (fig. 1A) (WHO 2009). The disease has resulted in widespread social and economic problems, especially among the poor, who are the most vulnerable group. There is currently no vaccine to prevent dengue virus infection (Etemad et al. 2008) making it difficult to control and manage the disease, although considerable efforts have been made, including Dengue viruses (Flavivirus) are mosquito-borne human pathogens with a worldwide prevalence. There are four antigenically-related dengue virus serotypes, DEN-1 to DEN-4, which cause serious problems of morbidity and mortality. Dengue is emerging rapidly as one of the most important public health problems in countries of the AsiaPacific region with nearly 1.8 billion people in the region at risk, in the yeast Pichia pastoris (Etemad et al. 2008). In this study, we aim to develop a similar envelope domain III (EDIII)-based tetravalent antigen, as well as the individual EDIIIs as monovalent candidates. The antigens will be expressed in tobacco chloroplasts, aiming for a cost-effective and safe production system by joint efforts of IndoNorwegian bilateral collaboration. Ongoing and future work B) A) vector control, sanctions, law enforcement and public education (www.who.int). A DEN vaccine should be tetravalent, as immunity to a single serotype does not offer crossprotection against the other serotypes (Hombach et al. 2005, Etemad et al. 2008). Such a tetravalent vaccine candidate has already been expressed successfully Several versions of the monovalent and tetravalent constructs (fig. 2A) have been synthesized, with sequences codon optimized for their expression in the chloroplast genome of tobacco. All variants of the codon optimized EDIII-constructs have been cloned into suitable vectors, and most constructs have been transformed into tobacco. Positive transformants have been identified by PCR-screening (fig. 3A) and transferred to soil (fig. 3B). Next, homoplasmy will be assessed by Southern blotting, before recombinant protein will be extracted from leaf tissue, and the level of expression (% total soluble protein) determined. The immunological properties of the recombinant vaccine candidate will subsequently be tested. Figure 1. A) Countries/areas at risk of dengue transmission, 2008 (WHO 2008) B) Aedes aegyptii, the dengue vector mosquito (tropisme.wordpress.com) Project objectives 1. Development and characterization of new experimental mono- and tetravalent vaccine candidates against dengue, an important mosquito-borne viral disease, by expressing the host cell receptor binding dengue EDIII of all four dengue virus serotypes. 2. Engineering of tobacco chloroplasts to facilitate a cost-effective and safe production system for dengue and other human and animal vaccines. Methodology EDIII-encoding sequences corresponding to all four DEN virus serotypes will be fused, generating expression vectors for the production of tetravalent dengue vaccine (fig. 2A). Several variants of this construct, as well as monovalent versions, will be transformed into tobacco chloroplasts using the biolistic transformation method, and subsequent selection will give raise to homoplasmic plants. The recombinant antigen (fig. 2B) will then be purified and subjected to immunological testing. Tobacco will be used because it is a non-food and non-feed crop with excellent biomass. It is an ideal choice for the production of vaccine antigens because of its relative tractability to genetic manipulation and an impending need to explore alternative uses. Furthermore, chloroplast transformation will be used to express EDIII antigens due to low production costs, low risk of contamination with human pathogens, and easy upscaling capacity. Figure 3. (A) PCR amplification of a 326 bp EDIII‐vector‐specific fragment identifies several positive transformants. The 300 bp fragment represents an non‐specific PCR‐ product also present in the WT plants. (B) Positive transformants have been transferred to soil. Photos by Even Sannes Riiser, 2011. Conclusions The use of plants for vaccine production offers several advantages. Unlike the bacterial and mammalian expression systems, plants are ideal for the production of clean and safe vaccine antigens free of contaminants. Plant systems are more economic as they can be produced on a larger scale than industrial systems. There is also minimized risk of contamination from potential human pathogens as plants are not hosts for human infectious agents. The EDIII-based recombinant protein is a promising candidate for the development of a safe, efficacious, and inexpensive tetravalent dengue vaccine. Acknowledgements A) EDIII‐1 EDIII‐2 EDIII‐3 B) EDIII-2 EDIII-1 EDIII-3 EDIII-4 www.bioforsk.no EDIII‐4 6x His Figure 2. Schematic drawing of (A) the synthesized DNA construct and (B) the recombinant polyprotein. (Even Sannes Riiser and Navin Khanna) We thank ICGEB colleagues for their support in providing the necessary information, including their previous work on the dengue virus and the antigen sequences. This poster represents an IndoNorwegian bilateral project on dengue vaccine financed jointly by the GLOBVAC program of the Research Council of Norway for Bioforsk and BOKU, and the Indian Department of Biotechnology for ICGEB. References • Etemad B, Batra G, Raut R, Dahiya S, Khanam S, Swaminathan S, Khanna N (2008) Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 79(3) 353-363. • Hombach J, Barrett AD, Cardosa MJ, Deubel V, Guzman M, Kurane I, RoehrigInnis BL JT, Sabchareon A, Kieny MP (2005). Vaccine 23: 2689—2695. E-mail: [email protected] 1Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research (Bioforsk), Høgskoleveien 7, N‐1432 Ås, Norway 2The International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), 110067 New Delhi, India 3University of Natural Resources & Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria Bioforsk Plant Health and Plant Protection Høgskolveien 7, 1432 Ås Norway