* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download An assessment of excess carbon dioxide partial pressures in natural
Ionic liquid wikipedia , lookup
Ionic compound wikipedia , lookup
Electrolysis of water wikipedia , lookup
Debye–Hückel equation wikipedia , lookup
Equation of state wikipedia , lookup
Nanofluidic circuitry wikipedia , lookup
Equilibrium chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Stability constants of complexes wikipedia , lookup
Chemical equilibrium wikipedia , lookup
The Science of the Total Environment 210r211 Ž1998. 173]185 An assessment of excess carbon dioxide partial pressures in natural waters based on pH and alkalinity measurements Colin Neal a,U , W. Alan House b , Kevin Downa b a Institute of Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 8BB, UK Institute of Freshwater Ecology, The Ri¨ers Laboratory, East Stoke, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 6BB, UK Abstract Methods of estimating excess partial pressures of carbon dioxide in river waters using pH and Gran alkalinity measurements are considered using data from several UK lowland rivers covering a spectrum of industrial, urban and agricultural catchments. Two simple equations are shown to be eminently suitable except for the most demanding accuracies at pH values greater than 9 when carbonate and hydroxide ions as well as calcium complexes with bicarbonate, carbonate and hydroxide become larger. The most basic of these equations, which simply allows for the averaged effects of temperature and ion activity, is EpCO 2 s Ž Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6ypH . )10 6ypHr6.0. The second equation, which allows for variation in temperature and average ionic strength, is EpCO 2 s Ž 0.95)Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6 y pH . )10 6 y pH . Ž 6.46y 0.0636 t8C . Within this equation, the 0.95 term represents the average factor which converts the chemical concentration of monovalent ions into chemical activities and t8C is temperature in degrees Celsius. For more demanding situations, such as at high pHs, the following equation is suggested EpCO 2 s Ž 0.95)Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6 y pH q 10 6qpHqp K water . )10 6 y pH . Ž 6.46y 0.0636)t8C. ) Ž 1 q 2.38)10 pH y p K 2 . As in the previous case, the 0.95 term allows for activity concentration relationships for univalent ions. For this equation, p K water and p K 2 represent minus the logarithm of the equilibrium constants for the respective reactions U Corresponding author. 0048-9697r98r$19.00 Q 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII S0048-9697Ž98.00011-4 174 C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 q 2y H 2 O s Hqq OHy and HCOy 3 s H q CO 3 , where p K water s y6.0843q 4471.33r Ž 273 q t8C. q 0.017053)Ž 273 q t8C. and p K 2 s y6.498q 2902.39r Ž 273 q t8C . q 0.02379)Ž 273 q t8C . . The Ž1 q 2.38)10 pHyp K 2 . term allows for the effect of the carbonate ion contribution to the alkalinity and it is the ratio of the carbonate ion to the sum of carbonate and bicarbonate with both the numerator and denominator in units of equivalent concentration. The 2.38 term converts the ratio of carbonate to bicarbonate from an activity to an equivalent concentration ratio. Comparisons of measured EpCO 2 for the River Frome agree well with estimates based on the above equations and this adds to the confidence of the methodologies above pH 6. For pH- 6, other methods are required owing to interferences from organic acids and aluminium. Q 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. Keywords: pH; Alkalinity; Carbon dioxide; Partial pressure; Excess carbon dioxide; Respiration; Photosynthesis; LOIS; Rivers; Tweed; Aire; Calder; Trent; Don; Ouse; Humber; Tweed; Yorkshire; Frome 1. Introduction Studies of dissolved carbon dioxide in natural waters provide an important indicator of their biological productivity and sewage contamination. This is because dissolved carbon dioxide provides an indication of the balance between photosynthesis and respiration by biota, both within the water column and sediments, and carbon dioxide transfers from the water column to the atmosphere Žas CO 2 gas. and precipitation as, for example, calcium carbonate minerals ŽHouse, 1989; Maberly, 1996; Hartley et al., 1996.. The study of such processes are of ecological and water management importance at the regional and national level, given Ža. the large range of carbon dioxide partial pressures observed within river systems ŽHoward et al., 1984; Hope et al., 1994; Dawson et al., 1995; Neal et al., 1997a; Jarvie et al., 1997. and Žb. potential impacts of changing climate on riverine water quality and biological status as identified for example within the UK Land Ocean Interaction Study ŽLOIS; Leeks and Jarvie, 1998; Marsh and Sanderson, 1997; Neal et al., 1997b.. While there are detailed methodologies available for the measurement of dissolved carbon dioxide ŽHope et al., 1995., unfortunately they are not commonly used. However, there is an alternative, much simplified procedure, available based on the measurement of two water quality measures, pH and alkalinity, which are standard de- terminands in the water industry and environmental studies ŽNeal, 1988, 1996; Avila and Roda, 1991.. While not as accurate as some direct methods of determination, the advantages of this alternative procedure are Ža. such data are extensively available for analysis, Žb. these procedures can be undertaken with ease using standard electrometric and titrimetric laboratory equipment if care is taken, and Žc. equipment costs and training times are relatively low. To calculate carbon dioxide partial pressures from pH and alkalinity determinations, a simple algorithm can be used based on equations of the type EpCO 2 s Ž Alk Gran q w Hq x. ) w Hq x r pCO2 )K 0,1 4 Ž 1a . where wx denotes chemical activity and EpCO 2 is the dissolved carbon dioxide concentration in a water sample divided by the dissolved carbon dioxide concentration in pure water in equilibrium with the atmosphere at the same temperature and pressure. For this equation, Alk Gran and wHqx are, respectively, the Gran alkalinity and the hydrogen ion concentration in solution Žin m Eqrl units. and K 0,1 is taken as a constant given by K 0,1 s K 0 ) K 1 )10 12 . Ž 1b . Here, pCO2 is the partial pressure of carbon C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 Table 1 Chemical reactions used for the chemical speciation calculations: wx represents chemical activities CO2 gas s CO2 dissolved CO2 dissolved q H2 O K0 where wH2 CO3 0 xU s H2 CO30 s wH2 CO3 0 xU rpCO2 s wCO2 dissolved x q wH2 CO30 x H2 CO3 0 K1 s Hqq HCO3 y s wHq x)wHCO3 y xrwH2 CO3 0 xU HCO3y K2 s Hqq CO32y s wHq x)wCO3 2y xrwHCO3 y x Ca2qq HCO3y K3 s CaHCO3q s wCaHCO3q xrŽwCa2q x)wHCO3y x. Ca2qq CO32y K4 s CaCO30 s wCaCO30 xrŽwCa2q x)wCO32y x. Ca2qq OHy K5 s CaOHq s wCaOHq xrŽwCa2q x)wOHy x. Hqq OHy Kwater s H2 O s wHq x)wOHy x CaCO3 Žsolid. K7:SOCaCO 3 s Ca2qq CO3 2y s wCa2q x)wCO3 2y x dioxide in air at standard temperature and pressure and K 0 and K 1 are, respectively, the equilibrium constants for the solubility of undissociated carbon dioxide in water and the dissociation of this component into hydrogen and bicarbonate ions ŽTable 1.. The 10 12 term in Eq. Ž1b. is a scaling factor which enables the use of m Eqrl units for Alk Gran and wHqx . There are five potential errors contained within the approach. K 0 and K 1 vary with temperature and although the variations in part cancel out when determining K 0,1 , K 0,1 is not completely independent of temperature. 2. K 0,1 is the product of thermodynamic constants defined in terms of chemical activities and needs to be corrected for the effects of ionic strength. 3. Eq. Ž1a. does not allow for the effects of 0 complexes such as CO 32y, CaHCOq 3 , CaCO 3 q and CaOH which can be prevalent in higher pH waters. 1. 175 4. pCO2 varies with meteorological conditions and altitude. 5. Other ions such as organic acids and aluminium contribute to the Gran alkalinity. In this paper, the influence of temperature, ionic strength and ion-pairs is examined to assess the errors involved: Appendix A provides comments on pCO2 corrections for pressure differences, while Neal and Hill Ž1994. cover corrections for aluminium and organic acid interference. The analysis is undertaken by examining different approximations that might be used, as applied to a variety of lowland UK rivers covering a spectrum of environments from pH 6 to over 10 where calcium concentrations can be relatively high ŽJarvie et al., 1997. and CO 32y, CaHCOq 3, CaCO 30 and CaOHq are important. The paper provides a companion to earlier work focusing on hydrograph splitting methodologies using alkalinity measurements and inorganic carbon transfers through acidic upland environments ŽNeal et al., 1997c,d.. It also complements analytical methodologies for acidic waters where the low alkalinities encountered introduce high proportionate analytical errors in EpCO 2 estimation ŽNeal, 1988; Neal and Hill, 1994.. A simplified generalized equation is provided for use in broad based water quality studies and as a basis for extending and enhancing ongoing LOIS and associated research ŽNeal et al., 1998a,b,c.. 2. Analytical methodology The primary goal to this paper is to assess to what degree excess partial pressures of carbon dioxide can be approximated by simple calculations using only measurements of pH, alkalinity and temperature. For the calculations, use was made of about 3 years of LOIS water quality data collected weekly from 15 sites: 11 for relatively clean and agricultural environments Žthree sites on the Tweed, one on the Derwent and seven on the Yorkshire Ouse and its tributaries . and four urban and industrial environments Žthe Aire, Calder, Don and Trent.: some 2052 data points. Detailed descriptions of the hydrology, water C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 176 Table 2 The temperature dependence of the thermodynamic equilibrium constants given in Table 1 is based on the generalized equation p K T s ylog 10 K T s aq brTq cT where T is the temperature in Kelvin K0 K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 Kwater K7:SO CaCO3 a b c 13.417 y14.8435 y6.498 y2.95 y27.393 1.40 y6.0843 y13.543 y2299.60 3404.71 2902.39 0.00 4114.00 0.00 4471.33 3000.00 y0.01422 0.03279 0.02379 0.01330 0.05617 0.00 0.017053 0.0401 The thermodynamic constants given in this table are taken from Harned and Davis 1943 Ž K 0 and K 1 ., Harned and Scholes 1941 Ž K 2 ., Jacobson and Langmuir 1974 Ž K 3 and K 7:SOCaCO 3 ., Reardon and Langmuir 1974 Ž K 4 ., Gimblett and Monk 1954 Ž K 5 . and Covington et al. 1977 Ž K water .. quality and biology of these rivers are given elsewhere ŽScience of the Total Environment, vol 194r195, 1997.; Leeks et al. Ž1997. provide details of the sampling, storage and analytical chemistry methodologies used to produce the data presented in this paper. Five methods are considered, based on chemical reactions and thermodynamic relationships given in Table 1 and Table 2, to illustrate increasing degrees of thermodynamic complexity with allowance for 1. Bicarbonate, 2. Bicarbonate, temperature and ionic strength, 3. Bicarbonate, carbonate and hydroxyl ions, temperature and ionic strength, 4. Bicarbonate, carbonate, hydroxyl, calciumbicarbonate, -carbonate and -hydroxide species, temperature and ionic strength, assuming a simple relationship between alkalinity and calcium concentration, 5. Bicarbonate, carbonate, hydroxyl and calcium-bicarbonate, -carbonate and -hydroxide species, temperature and ionic strength knowing calcium concentration. 2.1. Case 1: the base case This is the simplest formulation, as described in Section 1 ŽEq. 1a and Eq. 1b., and presented in Avila and Roda Ž1991. and Neal et al. Ž1997a.: EpCO 2 s Ž Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6 y pH . 12 )10 6 y pH % Ž pCO2 ) K 0 ) K 1 )10. Ž 1c . f Ž Alk Gran in m Eqrl units )10 6 y pH . )10 6 y pH r 5.25. Ž 1d. For this case, the thermodynamic constants used to generate the 5.25 term correspond to K 0 and K 1 values set at 208C. For this and all other cases presented in this paper, pCO2 for the atmosphere has been set to a value of 10y3 .5. 2.2. Case 2: the base case with correction for the temperature dependence of K 0 and K 1 and a¨erage ionic strength To allow for the effects of temperature on EpCO 2 estimation, the 5.25 term in Eq. Ž1d. needs to be replaced by a temperature related variable Ž f Ž t ... Using the thermodynamic constants given in Table 2, f Ž t . is shown to vary in the range 6.44 at 08C to 5.17 at 208C, a range of "11% about the mean of 5.84 at 108C. The relationship between f Ž t . and temperature is only slightly curvilinear in this temperature range. Consequently, linear regression of f Ž t . against t, in 8C, provides an excellent approximation f Ž t . s 6.46y Ž 0.0636) t8C. . Ž 2a . r 2 s 0.9993 and n s 21 Žtemperatures used for the calculation 0, 1, . . . , 208C.. Applying this regression relationship within Eq. Ž1c. gives EpCO 2 s Ž Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6 y pH . )10 6 y pH . Ž 6.46y Ž 0.0636)t8C.. Ž 2b . To allow for the effects of ion activity Žg . on EpCO 2 estimation, the right hand side of Eq. Ž2b. needs to be modified to allow for the relationship between the concentration and the activity of C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 bicarbonate and hydrogen ions. For charge balance purposes, bicarbonate needs to be computed from alkalinity and pH in concentration units in the ŽAlk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6y pH . term of Eq. Ž2b. that approximates the bicarbonate concentration. In practice, this means that the 10 6y pH term in the bracket must be divided by the appropriate univalent ion activity coefficient Žg 1 .. However, to use the full equation, the resultant estimate of bicarbonate concentration must be converted to chemical activity by multiplying it by the same ion activity coefficient i.e. the modified term becomes w HCOy x 3 f g 1 ) Ž Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q10 6 y pH . rg 1 Ž 2c . which is equivalent to x w HCOy 3 f Ž g 1 ) Alk Gran 6 y pH .. in m Eqrl units q 10 Ž 2d. The ion activity coefficient varies as a function of the salt content of the solution and this needs to be allowed for. For the calculation a typical background ‘sea salt’ concentration of 10 mgrl of chloride is used, the charge balance being matched by monovalent ions. Within the calculation, an allowance is also made for the effect of alkalinity where it is assumed that the alkalinity is primarily as bicarbonate ions and that the counterbalancing cation is a divalent one Ži.e. the alkalinity is taken to be derived from base cation weathering.. Using the Davies equation ŽAppelo and Postma, 1993. to calculate g 1 gives values of 0.99 to 0.90 within the alkalinity range considered in this paper. This variation leads to a reduction in the EpCO 2 estimate from Eqs. Ž1c. and Ž1d. of between 0 and 10% depending upon the alkalinity value. Since the activity correction is rather small, only the average uni-charged ion activity coefficient Ž0.95. is used to simplify matters. Allowing for the activity by modifying Eq. Ž2b. and Eq. Ž2d. gives EpCO 2 s 177 Ž 0.95)Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6 y pH . )10 6 y pH . Ž 6.46y 0.0636)t8C . Ž 2e . 2.3. Case 3: the base case with additional allowance for temperature, a¨erage ionic strength, [OH y], and [CO32 y ] In this case, allowance is made for the contributions that carbonate and hydroxide ions make to the total alkalinity by modifying Eq. Ž2b. in two ways. Firstly, a hydroxide component is added to the Ž0.95)Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6y pH . term. This component is the hydroxide concentration in m Eqrl and is given by 10 pHyp K waterq6rg 1. Thus Eq. Ž2d. becomes w HCOy3 x f g 1 ) Ž Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 q10 pH y p K waterq6rg 1 . 6 y pH rg 1 Ž 3a . which is equivalent to w HCO 3y x f Ž g 1 )Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q10 6 y pH q 10 pH y p K waterq6 . . Ž 3b . Secondly, there is a term for CO 32y and this equals 1rŽ1 q 2)Žg 1rg 2 .)10 pHyp K 2 ., the ratio of the bicarbonate to the bicarbonate plus carbonate in equivalent concentration units and g 2 is the ion activity coefficient for CO 32y. The resultant equation is EpCO 2 s Ž 0.95)Alk Gran in m Eqrl units q 10 6 y pH y10 pHq6 y p K water . )10 6 y pH = Ž 6.46y 0.0636)t8C . = Ž 1 q 2.38)10 pHyp K 2 . . Ž 3c . 2.4. Case 4: allowance is made for temperature, ionic strength, [CO32 y ], [CaHCO3q], [CaCO30 ] and [CaOH q] using an approximation linking alkalinity with calcium concentration 178 C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 For this case, calcium complexes with bicarbonate, carbonate and hydroxide are allowed for under the circumstances where no direct measurement of calcium has been made. To provide a methodology using the equations presented in Table 1, an estimate of the total calcium concentration in solution, Ca T 4 , Ca2qq CaHCOq 3q CaCO 30 q CaOHq, is required. To do this, Ca T 4 is taken to equal the number of equivalents of bicarbonate and carbonate charge, i.e. Ca T 4 Ž in m M r l units . s Alk Gran in m Eqrl units r 2. Ž 4a . This is equivalent to defining the alkalinity generated within the catchments as being counter-balanced by the production of calcium by weathering. The approach is reasonable at moderate to high alkalinities for UK rivers as Ž1. there is a very strong linear link between calcium and alkalinity ŽJarvie et al., 1997., Ž2. within catchment weathering is associated with calcium aluminosilicate and carbonate weathering and Ž3. calcium is the dominant non-atmospherically-derived base cation in the rivers. For the calculation, the charge balance is given by 2 y4 4 4 Alk Gran s HCOy q CaHCOy 3 q 2) CO 3 3 q2) CaCO 30 4 q CaOHq 4 q OHy 4 y Hq 4 Ž 4b . where all the terms in the 4 brackets are as concentrations and not as activities. Allowance is made for chemical activities using the Davies equation as in case 3 except for the ion activity coefficients being allowed to vary as a function of ionic strength rather than being set at average values. Using Eqs. Ž4a. and Ž4b., the Davies equation and the expressions given in Table 1 and Table 2, the excess carbon dioxide pressure is solved iteratively within a simple spreadsheet programme as outlined in Appendix B. Within the iterative solution, an initial EpCO 2 value has to be set and this value is given by the solution given with Eq. Ž2e.. A solution is obtained to these equations when the Gran alkalinity matches the estimate for the right hand side of Eq. Ž4b.. 2.5. Case 5: allowance is made for temperature, ionic strength, [CO32 y ], [CaHCO3q], [CaCO30 ] and [CaOH q] using measured ¨alues of calcium concentration in solution For this case, directly measured calcium concentrations are used with the iterative scheme provided in case 4 to determine more precisely the calcium complexes with bicarbonate, carbonate and hydroxide. To do so, Eq. Ž4a. is replaced by the constraint that Ca T 4 s Ca2q 4 q CaHCO 3q 4 q CaCO 30 4 q CaOH q 4 . Ž 5a . As with case 4, allowance is made for the chemical activity-concentration difference using the Davies equation within the calculations and the methodology is presented in Appendix B. 2.6. Comparisons between direct measurements and case 1 to case 5 methodologies In order to provide a validation of the theoretical methods developed in this paper, the formulations derived have been ‘blind’ tested against experimental measurements of EpCO 2 using unpublished data originally collected during 1982. The methods used for the determination of pH, alkalinity, temperature and calcium concentration were similar to those used during the LOIS study. The pH electrode was calibrated in the field at the field temperature using two buffers ŽKH 2 PO4-Na 2 HPO4 ; 1:1 ; pHs 7.472 and 0.01 M Na 2 B 4O 7 ? 10H 2 O; ; pH s 9.332, both at 108C.. The cell constant of the conductance cell was determined over a range of conductances Ž60]390 m S. using KCl solution and the concentration-conductance data from the LindZwolenik-Fuoss equation ŽLind et al., 1959.. Total alkalinity was measured by Gran titration with 0.1 M HCl and a total of five points in the pH range of 4 to 3 ŽMackereth et al., 1978.. The field site was at the river gauging station on the R. Frome in Dorset, England ŽNGR SY868868.. This site has been used in many previous studies of long-term changes in water quality and investigations of nutrient loads Že.g. Casey, C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 1975; Casey and Clarke, 1979; Talbot et al., 1990; Casey et al., 1993.. Ten measurements were made between April and September. The procedure consisted of making field measurements between 09:00 and 10:00 h of temperature, conductivity and pH with the calibration of all instruments in the field prior to the measurements. A 1-l sample of water from a depth of ; 0.5 m below the water surface was collected from a well-mixed zone of the river. This was immediately returned to the laboratory and filtered through a 0.45 mm cellulose nitrate membrane prior to total alkalinity and major ion analysis. A separate sample of 250 ml was immediately placed into a glass vessel in a water thermostat regulated to the temperature of the river. A humidified gas stream of CO 2 Ž- 10 ml miny1 . and nitrogen Ž; 1 l miny1 ., at the temperature of the river, was then purged through the water via a sintered-glass frit. The solution was then allowed to equilibrate with the gas mixture } taking ; 20 min when pH- 8 and ; 50 min between pH 8 and 8.5. The procedure was repeated with at least another three different gas mixtures to give gas compositions with partial pressures of CO 2 in the range of 0.5]4.3, i.e. EpCO 2 s 1.5]12.6. The partial pressure of CO 2 in the gas mixture, pCO2 , was calculated from the CO 2 flow rate and saturated water vapour pressure at the river water temperature with corrections for deviations of the atmospheric pressure from 760 mmHg. The low flow rates of CO 2 were calculated from measurements of the pressure difference across a stainless steel capillary using a dibutyl phthalate manometer. Both the nitrogen and CO 2 gas lines were calibrated using bubble meters. The pH values 179 obtained at equilibrium for the different CO 2rN2 mixtures are related by the equation: 1 r pCO2 s Ka1 K 0r Ž Alk Gran ž in m Eqrl q 10 6 y pH . )10 6 y pH q 2 Ka1 Ka2 K 0 / % Ž Alk Gran ž in m Eqrl q 10 6 y pH . 10 y 2pH / which is: 1 r pCO2 s R1r10ypH q R 2r10y2 pH where R1 and R 2 are regression coefficients and the Ka terms refer to an apparent dissociation constant. Hence the calibration involved the determination of the regression coefficients from the laboratory data and using the relationship to interpolate the pCO2 from the field pH measurement of the same river water. 3. Results The LOIS rivers show a pH variation in the range of about 6.6 to 10.4 while the alkalinities vary between 65 and 4425 m Eqrl. As pH increases, EpCO 2 decreases dramatically from around 48 at pH- 7 to around a fiftieth of the atmospheric value at pH 10 to 10.4, as conditions change from those controlled by predominantly respiration at low pH to predominantly photosynthesis at high pH in the cleaner rivers ŽTable 3.. Thus, the pH range across the LOIS rivers is largely determined by the biological activity and CO 2 transfer to the atmosphere Žsee also Neal et al., 1998a,b,c.. Table 3 Summary pH, alkalinity and EpCO 2 and methodology error statistics pH AlkGr an Ž m Eqrl. EpCO2 case 5 % Error case 1 % Error case 2 % Error case 3 % Error case 4 6.85 7.55 8.34 9.36 10.31 1812 2318 2444 1383 1662 42.65 11.48 2.38 0.12 0.06 18.0 14.3 15.6 35.6 214.8 y1.5 y0.7 0.7 19.1 197.4 y1.6 y1.1 y1.1 y1.9 11.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 0.9 1.8 The percentage errors relate to a comparison of EpCO 2 data for cases 1 to 4 with case 5 estimates. The table presents averages for pH ranges 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9, 9 to 10 and ) 10. C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 180 Table 4 Linear regression analysis of EpCO2 estimates from cases 1 to 3 with case 5 Case Constant Gradient r2 1 y0.13 Ž"2.04. 0.00 Ž"0.28. y0.03 Ž"0.27. 0.0023 Ž"0.060. 1.155 Ž"0.004. 0.993 Ž"0.000. 0.993 Ž"0.000. 1.018 Ž"0.000. 0.9930 2 3 4 However, if percentage errors are considered, then, for the cases without allowance for carbonate and calcium complexation, the magnitude of these errors increase with increasing pH ŽTable 3.. Thus, in the pH range 9]10 there are errors of up to about 35% and above pH 10 there are errors of the order of 200% for cases 1 and 2. For cases 3 and 4, where a simple approximation is made for calcium concentration and calcium complexation is allowed for, the errors become much reduced throughout the pH range when estimates are compared with the most accurate assessment Žcase 5.. The similarity of these cases illustrates that the main reason for the discrepancy between cases 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 is related to the changing importance of carbonate ions through the pH range: calcium complexation is of much lower significance. With regards to a comparison of more direct and estimated EpCO 2 values based on data from the River Frome, measured EpCO 2 values are in the range 2]7 times the atmospheric value ŽTable 5.. Calculated values of EpCO 2 based on the case 2]5 equations give slightly higher values than those measured Žby about 11%.: the case 1 methodology gives a positive error of about twice this value. In comparison, thermodynamic estimation of EpCO 2 based on a full chemical analysis where all the major inorganic carbon complexes are allowed for ŽWateq: Truesdell and Jones, 1974; Nordstrom et al., 1984., give values typically about 8% too low. Elimination of one outlier point Ža q34% and q9% error for method three 0.9998 0.9998 0.9999 The terms in brackets correspond to twice the standard error: N s 2052. Comparison of calculation methodologies show remarkably consistent patterns with very strong linear inter-relationships between computed EpCO 2 values when compared with the most accurate case 5 assessment ŽTable 4.. The poorest relationship occurs for the simplest estimate where EpCO 2 is typically overestimated by about 15]20% and data scatter is higher. However, even in this case, the variation is small compared to the wide range of EpCO 2 values determined Ž0.1 to ) 100 times the atmospheric value.. Furthermore, a change in K 0,1 within Eq. Ž1d. from 5.25 to about 6 based on a value more appropriate to an average temperature for the UK rivers and a typical ionic strength, would cancel out the average deviation Žbut not the scatter .. For the remaining cases, the correspondences are higher and there seems little to choose between the approaches ŽTable 4.. Table 5 A comparison of measured and calculated EpCO 2 for the river Frome pH Alk Ž m Eqrl. Temp Ž8C. Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 Method 5 Method Wateq Measured 8.29 8.38 8.21 8.31 8.24 8.42 8.32 8.17 8.01 8.20 3930 3880 3970 4010 3850 3890 3940 3930 3680 3970 12.2 10.6 13.6 18.0 16.6 15.2 17.0 17.8 16.6 15.3 3.8 3.1 4.6 3.7 4.2 2.8 3.6 5.1 6.8 4.8 3.4 2.7 4.1 3.5 3.9 2.6 3.3 4.8 6.3 4.4 3.3 2.6 4.1 3.4 3.8 2.5 3.3 4.7 6.3 4.3 3.4 2.6 4.1 3.5 3.9 2.5 3.3 4.8 6.4 4.3 3.4 2.7 4.2 3.5 3.9 2.6 3.3 4.8 6.4 4.4 2.8 2.2 3.5 2.9 3.2 2.1 2.7 3.9 5.3 3.6 2.6 3.9 3.3 3.4 2.3 2.5 4.5 5.7 C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 and Wateq estimation, respectively. reduces the case 2]5 errors to about q7% and increases the Wateq error to about y10%. From this, it is clear that Ž1. the alkalinity-pH estimated values of EpCO 2 agree well with observation with typical errors of less than 15% and Ž2. detailed thermodynamic assessment of EpCO 2 based on an elaborate full set of major ion chemistries does not significantly improve on the accuracy of prediction. Thus, the field measurements add support to the validity of the methodologies developed within this paper ŽTable 6.. 4. Discussion For all the waters studied, a simplified approach to EpCO 2 assessment based on pH and alkalinity measurements is shown to be adequate from a theoretical standpoint and all the calculations needed can be made using standard spreadsheet packages ŽLOTUS 123 version 5 in this case.. For many applications, there is little need to use more elaborate formulation than either Eq. Ž1d. Žwith the 5.25 term replaced by 6. or Eq. Ž2e. and the latter approach is recommended when information on water temperature is available. However, for more rigorous applications, particularly at pH) 9, then Eq. Ž3c. is recommended. 4.1. Other analytical uncertainties Within the paper comment has not been made on Ža. waters which are more acidic ŽpH- 6. and Žb. analytical chemistry errors. In the former case, Table 6 A comparison of measured and estimated excess partial pressures of carbon dioxide for eight Frome river samples: percentage errors, minimum and maximum percentage errors and standard deviation to errors Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 Method 5 Wateq Average Minimum Maximum S.D. 21.8 11.3 9.5 11.2 12.1 y7.8 12.8 2.1 0.3 1.6 2.5 y16.5 44.5 34.0 31.5 33.5 34.7 9.2 9.2 9.3 9.0 9.2 9.3 7.1 181 such acidic waters pose a more difficult challenge as alkalinities are much lower Žnegative in some cases. and there are strong interferences from aluminium and organic acids which are enriched in such waters. However, there are more appropriate analytical titrimetric procedures available ŽNeal, 1988.. In the latter case, the main error is probably associated with the measurement of pH where discrepancies of 0.1 pH or more can occur in the field and laboratory without the most rigorous degree of analytical care. Accurate measurement of pH is particularly problematical in acidic waters due to the low ionic strengths involved ŽNeal and Thomas, 1985.. Correspondingly, for less acidic and more basic waters, degassing of carbon dioxide during sampling, storing and subsequent pH measurement can lead to anomalous increases in pH. Even with reasonable care, the introduction of such errors can result in an EpCO 2 measurement uncertainty of plus or minus 25% in terms of accuracy although precision may be much better Ži.e. the electrode response and degassing effects are consistent .. While there is considerable merit in undertaking pH measurement in the field to minimize degassing and other sample storage effects, it must be remembered that electrode drift due to differences in temperature between sample, electrodes and buffers as well as electrode storage prior to analysis can be important. No standard procedure is recommended here, but it is strongly urged that good protocols be established which take into account these potential errors. With regards to allowances for the actual ionic strength of water samples, a method analogous to the case 3 situation ŽHoward et al., 1984; House et al., 1988. estimates the ionic strength from a conductivity measurement of the sample ŽTalbot et al., 1990. and then applies the Davies equation to determine individual ion activity coefficients. While, this change is of second order importance, where conductivity measurements are available, a correction can be made using a linear relationship between ionic strength Ž I . and conductivity: regression analysis of all the LOIS core data gives I Ž molr l . s 13.1)10 y 6 )conductivitym Srcm at 258C C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 182 q 0.7051)10 y 3 where R 2 s 0.573 and N s 1000. Given all these factors, then for situations Ža. where highly accurate EpCO 2 determinations and Žb. where alkalinity becomes especially high and calcium carbonate solubility controls and complex speciation interactions become more dominant, then detailed chemical and thermodynamic analysis may well be required. However, at this level of sophistication, direct measurements of EpCO 2 such as those described by Hope et al. Ž1995. become appropriate. For the lowland waters with positive alkalinities studied in this paper, the difference between measured and calculated values of EpCO 2 of - 40% is adequate and surprisingly good for the level of analytical sophistication and simplicity of methodology. 5. Conclusions Measurement of pH and alkalinity in the field is relatively quick and easy to undertake provided reasonable care is taken over pH measurement and samples of river water are not allowed to lose carbon dioxide prior to pH measurement. Given a good analytical procedure and the merit of simple algorithms for assessing EpCO 2 , then campaigns can easily be undertaken to examine at a semiquantitative to quantitative level the dynamics of CO 2 transfers within river systems. The measurement of EpCO 2 using pH and alkalinity analysis needs to be considered an integral part of riverine environmental water quality and biological studies. Such studies take on a special importance within areas such as lowland UK waterways where the effects of climate variability and drought conditions are most apparent. Appendix 1 Air pressure dependence upon EpCO 2Within the calculations of EpCO 2 described in the text, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the air has been taken as 10y3 .5, the standard value for sea level, at an atmospheric pressure of 760 mmHg Ž1013.25 mb.. However, with altitude and changing weather conditions, atmospheric pressure varies about this value. For more accurate EpCO 2 assessment, allowance for this difference is required. If the actual pressure is not known, then it may be calculated from the expression PsrP0 s ŽŽ 288 y 0.0065) s . r288. 5.256 Ž A-1a. where P is pressure, s is the altitude in metres and P0 is the standard atmospheric pressure at sea level ŽSmithsonian Institute, 1966.. Alternatively if the pressure is known then PsrP0 s mmHgr760s mbr1013.25 Ž A-1b. To compensate for the pressure change, EpCO 2 s EpCO 2 calculated ) PsrP0 Ž A1-c. Thus, for example, based on Eqs. ŽA-1a. and ŽA-1c., at an altitude of 1000 m, PsrP0 s 0.887, a change in EpCO 2 of about 11%. Appendix 2 EpCO 2 estimation using methods 1]5 presented in this paper, using a LOTUS 123 spreadsheet programme Here two tables are provided. The first gives the spreadsheet formulations to use and the second provides an automated means of undertaking the iterative calculations for a matrix of values rather than a single solution. Table 1a shows a spreadsheet formulation for EpCO 2 estimation. To determine a solution to the equations presented in cases 4 and 5, the spreadsheet routine backsolver is employed. To use backsolver, where the equation cell is the charge equation Žcolumn i., the adjustable variable is the case 4r5 EpCO 2 estimate cell Žcolumn h. for a target value is 0. The calculation is based on information in row 17 Žhence the terms a17, b17, c17 . . . ab17.. For the case where no calcium data is available, then either zero or negative C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 values need to be given in the calcium cell Žd17.: cell j17 provides an algorithm for distinguishing the case 4 and case 5 situations. Within the table, concentrations are provided as activities unless stated; rootŽI. is the square root of the ionic 183 strength and gamma1 and gamma2 correspond to g 1 and g 2 , respectively. The wording highlighted in bold in the value column of the table corresponds to positions where data values need to be inserted. Row Header row Value row a b c d e f g pH Alkalinity Ž m Eqrl. Temperature Ž8C. Ca Žmgrl. EpCO2 Case 1 EpCO2 Case 2 EpCO2 Case 3 h EpCO2 Case 4r5 i Charge j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad CaŽtot. CaCO3 sat k0 k1 k2 k3 k4 k5 kwater k7 OH H2CO3 HCO3 CO3 Ca2 q CaHCO3 CaCO3 CaOH rootŽI. gamma1 gamma2 Insert value Insert value Insert value Insert value ŽB17 q Ž10H y A17..) Ž10H Ž6 y A17..r5.25 ŽŽ0.95) B17. q Ž10H y A17..) Ž10H Ž6 y A17..rŽ6.46y Ž0.0636) C17.. ŽŽ0.95) B17. q ŽŽ10H y A17.r0.95. q ŽŽ10H ŽA17q 6 q @LOGŽR17...r0.95..) Ž10H Ž6 y A17.. rŽŽ6.46y Ž0.0636) C17..) Ž1 q Ž2) Ž0.95r0.8.) 10H ŽA17q @LOGŽN17..... Insert estimate ŽThe value of the case 3 estimate of EpCO2 , g17. ŽB17)Ž10H y 6.. q ŽŽ10H y A17.rAC17. y ŽV17rAC17. y Ž2) W17rAD17. yŽY17rAC17. y Ž2) Z17r1. y ŽT17rAC17. y ŽAA17rAC17. @IFŽD17-s 0,B17r2000000,D17r40000. @LOGŽW17) X17. y @LOGŽS17. 10H y Ž13.417y Ž2299.6rŽ273 q C17.. y Ž0.01422) Ž273 q C17... 10H ŽyŽy14.8345q Ž3404.71rŽ273 q C17.. q Ž0.03279) Ž273 q C17.... 10H ŽyŽy6.498q Ž2902.39rŽ273 q C17.. q Ž0.02379) Ž273 q C17.... 10 H y Žy2.95q Ž0.0133) Ž273 q C17... 10H ŽyŽy27.393q Ž4114rŽ273 q C17.. q Ž0.0561) Ž273 q C17.... 10H y 1.4 10H y Žy6.0846q Ž4471.33rŽ273 q C17. q Ž0.017053) Ž273 q C17.... 10H y Žy13.543q Ž3000rŽ273 q C17. q 0.0401) Ž273 q C17... qR17r10H y A17 qL17) Ž10H y 3.5.) H17 qM17) U17rŽ10H y A17. qN17) V17rŽ10H y A17. qJ17)AD17rŽŽ1rAD17. q ŽV17) O17rAC17. q ŽW17) P17rAC17. q ŽQ17) T17rAC17.. qO17) X17) V17 qP17) X17) W17 qQ17) T17) X17 ŽŽŽ20r35450. q T17q V17q Ž10H y A17. q Ž4) ŽW17q J17...r2.H 0.5 10H y Ž0.5) ŽŽAB17rŽ1 q AB17.. y Ž0.3)AB17... 10H y Ž0.5) 4) ŽŽAB17rŽ1 q AB17.. y Ž0.3)AB17... Table 1b shows a macro scheme to use with the spreadsheet formulation given in Appendix B, Table 1a. Within the table, cell c10 and cells d3 to d7 require user-specified values. In the case of cells c10 and d3 to d5, fixed values of 1, 0, 9 and 8 are respectively used. The start and end rows are given as 17 and 56 in cells d6 and d7 to provide an example of calculations for data provided in rows 17 to 56 inclusive, but these are changed according to individual needs. To use this scheme it is recommended that Row Column a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Column c Column d for $c$10;$d$6;$d$7;1;$a$84 Target value s Equation cell Žcolumn. s Adjustable variable Žcolumn. s Start rows End rows backsolve @coordŽ1;$d$4;$c$10;1.; $d$3;@coordŽ1;$d$5;$c$10;1.4 Counter s 0 9 8 17 56 1 184 C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 1. The information given in Appendix B, Table 1b be typed into the spreadsheet beginning in cell a1; 2. The header row presented in Appendix B, Table 1a be typed into the spreadsheet row 15 and the equations given in the table be typed into row 17; 3. Data for pH, alkalinity, temperature and calcium be typed into rows a17, b17, c17 and d17; a18, b18, c18, d18 etc. and the formulas Že17 to ad17. be copied to all the rows with data. If calcium concentrations are not determined then insert zeros or negative values in the appropriate row of the d column. If temperature is not known then insert an average estimate Že.g. 108C.; 4. The spreadsheet be saved for safety; 5. Provide an estimate of EpCO 2 in column h using values from the corresponding case 3 estimate Žcolumn g. using the range-value keys; 6. Apply the tools-macro-run facility, starting in cell a1. References Appelo, C.A.J, Postma, D., 1993. Geochemistry of groundwater and pollution. Balkema, Rotterdam, p. 536. Avila, A., Roda, F., 1991. Red rains as major contributors of nutrients and alkalinity to terrestrial ecosystems at Montseny ŽNE Spain.. Orsis 6, 215]229. Casey, H., 1975. Variation in the chemical composition of the R. Frome from 1965]1972. Freshwater Biol. 5, 507]514. Casey, H., Clarke, R.T., 1979. Statistical analysis of nitrate concentrations from the River Frome ŽDorset. for the period 1965]76. Freshwater Biol. 9, 91]97. Casey, H., Clarke, R.T., Smith, S.M., 1993. Increases in nitrate concentrations in the River Frome ŽDorset. catchment related to changes in land-use, fertilizer applications and sewage inputs. Chem. Ecol. 8, 105]117. Covington, A.K., Ferra, M.A., Robinson, R.A., 1977. Ionic product and enthalpy of ionization of water from electromotive force measurements. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1, 1721]1730. Dawson, J.J.C., Hope, D., Cresser, M.S., Billett, M.F., 1995. Downstream changes in free CO 2 in an upland catchment in NE Scotland. J. Environ. Qual. 24, 699]706. Gimblett, F.G.R., Monk, C.B., 1954. E.M.F. studies of electrolytic dissociation, part 7. Some alkali and alkaline earth metal hydroxides in water. Trans. Faraday Soc. 76, 964]972. Hartley, A.M., House, W.A., Leadbeater, B.S.C., Callow, M.E., 1996. The use of micro-electrodes to study the precipitation of calcite upon algal biofilms. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 183, 498]505. Harned, H.S., Davis, R., Jr, 1943. The ionization constant of carbonic acid in water and the solubility of carbon dioxide in water and aqueous salt solutions from 0]508C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 65, 2030]2037. Harned, H.S., Scholes, S.R., 1941. The ionization constant of HCOy 3 from 0]508C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 63, 1706]1709. Hope, D., Billett, M.F., Cresser, M.S., 1994. A review of the export of carbon dioxide in river water, fluxes and processes. Environ. Pollut. 84, 301]324. Hope, D., Dawson, J.J.C., Cresser, M.S., Billett, M.F., 1995. A method for measuring free CO 2 in upland streamwater using headspace analysis. J. Hydrol. 166, 1]14. House, W.A., 1989. Kinetics of crystallisation of solids from aqueous solutions. In: Comprehensive chemical kinetics reactions at the liquid-solid interface, vol. 28, chapter 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam. House, W.A., Shelley, N., Fox, A.M., 1988. Chemical modelling applications to experimental streams. Hydrobiologia 178, 93]112. Howard, J.R., Skirrow, G., House, W.A., 1984. Major ion and carbonate chemistry of a navigable freshwater canal. Freshwater Biol. 14, 515]532. Jacobson, R.L., Langmuir, D., 1974. Dissociation constants of calcite and CaHCOq 3 from 0]508C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 38, 301]318. Jarvie, H.P., Neal, C., Leach, D.V., Ryland, G.P., House, W.A., Robson, A.J., 1997. Major ion concentrations and the inorganic carbon chemistry of the Humber rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 194r195, 285]302. Leeks, G.J.L., Jarvie, H.P., 1998. Introduction to the Land Ocean Interaction Study ŽLOIS.: rationale and international context. Sci. Total Environ. 210r211, 5]20. Leeks, G.J.L., Neal, C., Jarvie, H.P., Casey, H., Leach, D.V., 1997. The LOIS river monitoring network: strategy and implementation. Sci. Total Environ. 194r195, 101]110. Lind, J.F., Zwolenik, J.J., Fuoss, R.M., 1959. Calibration of conductance cells at 258C with aqueous solutions of potassium chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 1557]1559. Maberly, S.C., 1996. Diel, episodic and seasonal changes in pH and concentrations of inorganic carbon in a productive lake. Freshwater Biol. 35, 579]595. Mackereth, F.J.H., Heron, J., Talling, J.F., 1978. Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. Scientific publication no. 36. Freshwater Biological Association 120, 35]42. Marsh, T.J., Sanderson, F.J., 1997. A review of hydrological conditions throughout the period of the LOIS monitoring programme } considered within the context of the recent UK climatic volatility. Sci. Total Environ. 194r195, 59]70. Neal, C., 1988. pCO2 variations in stream waters draining an acidic and acid sensitive spruce forested catchment in midWales. Sci. Total Environ. 76, 279]283. C. Neal et al. r The Science of the Total En¨ironment 210 r 211 (1998) 173]185 Neal, C., 1996. Towards lumped integrated models of complex heterogeneous environmental systems. Sci. Total Environ. 183, 115]124. Neal, C., Thomas, A.G., 1985. Field and laboratory measurement of pH in low-conductivity natural waters. J. Hydrol. 79, 319]322. Neal, C., Hill, S., 1994. Dissolved inorganic and organic carbon in moorland and forest streams: Plynlimon, mid-Wales. J. Hydrol. 153, 231]243. Neal, C., Robson, A.J., Harrow, M., Hill, L., Wickham, H., Bhardwaj, C.L., Tindall, C.I., Ryland, G.P., Leach, D.V., Johnson, R.C., Bronsdon, R.K., Cranston, M., 1997a. Major, minor, trace element and suspended sediment variations in the River Tweed: results from the LOIS core monitoring programme. Sci. Total Environ. 194r195, 193]206. Neal, C., House, W.A., Jarvie, H.P., Leeks, G.J.L., Marker, A.H., 1997b. Conclusions to the special volume of Science of the Total Environment concerning UK fluxes to the North Sea, Land Ocean Interaction Study: river basins research, the first two years. Sci. Total Environ. 194r195, 467]478. Neal, C., Robson, A.J., Shand, P., Edmunds, W.M., Dixon, A.J., Buckley, D.K., Hill, S., Harrow, M., Neal, M., Reynolds, B., 1997c. The occurrence of groundwater in the lower Palaeozoic rocks of upland Central Wales. Hydrol. Earth System Sci. 1, 3]18. Neal, C., Hill, T., Alexander, S., Reynolds, B., Hill, S., Dixon, A.J., Harrow, M., Neal, M., Smith, C.J., 1997d. Stream water quality in acid sensitive UK upland areas, an example 185 of potential water quality remediation based on groundwater manipulation. Hydrol. Earth System Sci. 1, 185]196. Neal, C., House, W.A., Jarvie, H.P., Eatherall, A., 1998a. The significance of dissolved carbon dioxide in major lowland rivers entering the North Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 210r211, 187]203. Neal, C., Harrow, M., Williams, R.J., 1998b. Dissolved carbon dioxide and oxygen in the River Thames: spring and summer 1997. Sci. Total Environ. 210r211, 205]217. Neal, C., House, W.A., Whitton, B.A., Leeks, G.J.L., 1998c. Conclusions to special issue: water quality and biology of UK rivers entering the North Sea: the Land Ocean Interaction Study ŽLOIS. and associated work. Sci. Total Environ. 210r211, 585]594. Nordstrom, D.K., Valentine, S.D., Ball, J.W., Plummer, L.N., Jones, B.F., 1984. Partial compilation and revision of basic data in the WATEQ programmes. United States Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigation Report 84-4186. Reardon, E.J., Langmuir, D., 1974. Thermodynamic properties of the ion pairs MgCO30 and CaCO 30 from 10 to 508C. Am. J. Sci. 274, 599]612. Smithsonian Institute, 1966. Smithsonian miscellaneous collections, 114, 6th ed. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, p. 268. Talbot, J.D.R., House, W.A., Pethybridge, A.D., 1990. Prediction of the temperature dependence of electrical conductance for river waters. Water Res. 24, 1295]1304. Truesdell, A.H., Jones, B.F., 1974. WATEQ, a computer programme for calculating chemical equilibrium of natural waters. US Geol. Survey J. Res. 2, 233]248.