Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
New stand capacity: Review of Akkeron drawing. Every stadium has both a net capacity, a gross capacity, and Safe capacity. Net capacity This is the number of seats that are available for sale or complimentary use for a given event. Net capacity requirements stipulate that all seats must have an unimpeded view of the pitch, meaning that they must not be in any way obstructed by advertising hoardings or any other permanent or temporary structures that could interfere with a spectator’s enjoyment when seated. The net capacity of a stadium includes seating for: • ordinary spectators; • VIP and VVIPs; • officials (from FA, UEFA, FIFA, etc.); • disabled spectators and their companions. The number of seats allocated to each category, and hence the overall net capacity, will vary from competition to competition. The net capacity will also be affected by the special seating and facilities required for different types of tournament. For example, for UEFA or FIFA competitions increased media seat allocations, additional camera positions and larger advertising hoardings located closer to the pitch can all significantly reduce the total net capacity. Gross capacity The gross capacity of a venue refers to all of the seats within the stadium, including those for the general public, VIPs, media and officials. Safe capacity The safe capacity is a mandatory requirement which focuses, as the name suggests, on ensuring maximum safety for spectators. Safe capacity can broadly be defined as the maximum capacity that will allow for a full and safe evacuation of the stadium via dedicated access. Within the existing stand the following areas of seating will be lost to the overall net capacity available, all these could be located in the clear area in front of the banqueting hall at first floor area (where I have shown them), however this may not be acceptable as it may be the intention to keep this area clear so the game can be viewed through the glass from the hall. A TV camera position, would be required, and is currently not shown on the official drawings. If this is the case, and a seating area has to be lost, based on the Exeter Chiefs proposed design which I have access to, this would result in the loss of approx 2 rows of seats in 1 block: i.e. about 56 seats. (Note Sky TV are also developing 3d TV for their sports coverage, so should this be successful and Argyle play at a higher level a further 150-200 seats may be lost to accommodate this.) The directors box (40 seats minimum by league requirements, but likely to be more than this minimum figure) Media positions (radio predominantly at the moment). Also if premium seating is introduced this may have a more generous spacing which will further erode overall capacity. The small upper tier currently shown has no means of access detailed. To access this safely at least one complete row of seats will be lost, as I have shown. This gives a net capacity of 4591. This is 400 seats below that stated on the consultation plans. This could reduce by a further 100 if TV cameras, directors and media are to be accommodated in the seating area. Plymouth Argyle Supporters Trust have proposed an alternative two tier proposal for the new stand. This stand has a net capacity of approximately of 7000 seats, and will therefore preserve the existing ground capacity to a suitable level for the Football League Championship based on previous gates when we last played at that level. This arrangement also has the considerable advantage of removing the internal columns which are shown on the current scheme. The columns area in the middle of the main hospitality area which would certainly detract from the space and make it less desirable for conferences or other functions which may be held there. This proposal would preserve the footprint of the stand already developed and the internal layouts, and fit between the adjacent proposed buildings. As a result this significant increase in capacity could be achieved at only a small additional cost to the overall scheme and a fraction of the cost of any future expansion that has been discussed. The seat spacing shown is 840mm on both the Akkeron design and our alternative, as I have tried to replicate what they have already done. Closing the seats could be a good way to make some additional capacity, the 840mm currently shown seems way over the current guidance. See table below. If the seats were closed to a still generous 800mm that would create 20 x 40mm = 800mm on the lower tier or room for an extra row of seats (224). Closing to the recommended 760mm could create two extra rows or 448 seats on the lower tier. The upper tier would probably need a wider access horizontally which is currently tight, however moving to 760 spacing on the upper tier could still accommodate an extra row. So in total there is potential for up to 672 seats. It may be decided to reserve one area as premium seats (say upper tier), where there could be a bit more legroom, possibly padded seats etc and sell tickets at a premium price. There may knock on effects such as a necessity to change the angle of the stand, but more work would need to be done to determine this. At the moment I would think suggestion need to be put to the club for consideration.