* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Role of exercise training on cardiovascular disease in persons who
Survey
Document related concepts
Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 Role of exercise training on cardiovascular disease in persons who have type 2 diabetes and hypertension Kerry J. Stewart, EdD, FAACVPR, FACSM, FSGC Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA Regular exercise is an important modality in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Most studies of exercise training in patients who had diabetes were concerned with glycemic and weight control and less on its affect on cardiovascular health. Hypertension is a common comorbid condition in patients who have type 2 diabetes. Although it is well-established that exercise reduces blood pressure in persons who do not have diabetes, the effects of exercise on blood pressure and parameters of cardiovascular structure and function in patients who have type 2 diabetes and hypertension has not been examined fully. This article identifies the cardiovascular consequences of these conditions, discusses the potential mechanisms by which exercise training may improve cardiovascular health, and provides practical guidelines for exercise prescription. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular health Type 2 diabetes is associated with dysfunction and failure of various organs, especially the heart and peripheral blood vessels. The molecular basis for type 2 diabetes is poorly understood but insulin resistance and b-cell dysfunction are welldocumented [1,2]. Environmental influences and genetic factors [3,4], and in particular, the increasing prevalence of obesity [5] and a sedentary lifestyle [6] are likely contributors to the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Two other metabolic conditions that precede the development of overt diabetes also have adverse effects on cardiovascular health. E-mail address: [email protected] Prediabetes is a metabolic condition that is between normal glucose homeostasis and diabetes [7]; its prevalence in 2000 was estimated at nearly 12 million adults in the United States [8]. The risk of progressing from prediabetes to overt diabetes is about 10% over 6.5 years [9]. There also is a 40% increased risk of mortality, independent of other risk factors, in persons who have impaired glucose tolerance [10]. The metabolic syndrome also stems from an underlying abnormality in insulin resistance [11–13]. The Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) [14] included clinical criteria for diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome. Its estimated prevalence is greater than 20% of the United States adult population [15] and approaches 50% in older groups [16]. Although type 2 diabetes increases the risk of microvascular complications, such as retinopathy and nephropathy [17,18], most diabetic patients die of macrovascular complications, including coronary artery disease and stroke. Type 2 diabetes increases the risk of cardiovascular disease by 200% to 400% [19]. The burden of cardiovascular disease is pronounced, especially in women who have diabetes [20]. The risk of macrovascular disease is increased before glucose levels reach the diagnostic threshold for diabetes; 25% of newly diagnosed patients already have overt cardiovascular disease [21]. The coexistence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension Hypertension is associated with diabetes, largely independent of age and obesity [22], although abdominal visceral obesity is an especially strong risk factor for the development of both conditions [23]. Hypertension is part of the metabolic 0733-8651/04/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2004.06.007 cardiology.theclinics.com 570 K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 syndrome [24], with a prevalence as high as 60% in patients who have type 2 diabetes [25]. According to The Seventh Report Of The Joint National Committee On Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment Of High Blood Pressure [26], diabetes is a compelling indication for treating hypertension aggressively in affected patients. There is an estimated doubling of cardiovascular events when hypertension and diabetes coexist [27]. These patients have abnormalities in central and peripheral parameters of cardiovascular structure and function that precede the clinical manifestation of cardiovascular disease, including increased left ventricular mass and wall thickness, left ventricular diastolic filling abnormalities, impaired endothelial function, increased arterial stiffness, and systemic inflammation. In the Strong Heart study [28], clinically-relevant findings were that left ventricular mass was 6% to 14% greater, left ventricular function was 5% less, and arterial stiffness was 12% greater among patients with diabetes. Although glycemic control is essential for preventing microvascular disease [29], intensive blood pressure control is required for reducing cardiovascular events in diabetic patients who have hypertension [27,29]. Low-dosage diuretics, b-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or calcium antagonists are used as first-line therapy [30]. In the Hypertension Optimal Treatment Study [31], intensive diastolic blood pressure lowering was associated with a 49% reduction in cardiovascular events in patients who had diabetes. The blood pressure goal in patients who have type 2 diabetes is less than 130/80 mm Hg [26]. Because of the harmful effects of these diseases, there is a need for therapies, above and beyond pharmacologic measures, that may help to attenuate the cardiovascular consequences of diabetes and hypertension. Exercise training for diabetes and hypertension The American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand on ‘‘Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes’’ [25] says, ‘‘physical activity, including appropriate endurance and resistance training, is a major therapeutic modality for type 2 diabetes.’’ The American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Recommendations 2002 [32] says ‘‘the possible benefits of exercise in type 2 diabetes are substantial.’’ Data from the National Health Interview Survey [33] demonstrated that among a diverse spectrum of adults who had diabetes, walking was associated with a 39% lower all- cause mortality and a 34% lower cardiovascular disease mortality. It was further estimated that 1 death per year could be prevented for every 61 people who would walk at least 2 hours per week. Well-established adaptive responses to exercise training in conditions of insulin resistance are improved glucose tolerance and enhanced skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity of glucose transport [34]. A meta-analysis of 14 trials reported that exercise training reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) by 0.66%—a clinically important reduction [35]. An evidence-based review found that the effect of aerobic or resistance training on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes is positive, although evidence for a dose-response relationship is lacking [36]. Increased participation in exercise also plays a role in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and related metabolic conditions. Laaksonen and colleagues [37] found that men who engaged in more than 3 hours per week of moderate or vigorous leisure time physical activity were half as likely as their sedentary counterparts to develop the metabolic syndrome over a follow-up period of 4 years. In the multicultural Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study [38], increased levels of nonvigorous and vigorous physical activity were associated with higher insulin sensitivity. Among women in the Nurse’s Health Study [39], sedentary behaviors, especially television watching, were associated with an elevated risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes, whereas even light to moderate activity was associated with a decreased risk of developing these conditions. In the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Study [40], which enrolled subjects who had impaired glucose tolerance, the intensive lifestyle intervention reduced the incidence of developing type 2 diabetes by 58%, whereas pharmacologic therapy with metformin reduced the incidence by 31% as compared with placebo. The lifestyle intervention, which included at least 30 minutes of moderate physical activity every day, was significantly more effective than metformin. The risk of developing diabetes after 4 years also was reduced by 58% after participation in a diet and exercise program in older, obese Finnish men and women [41]. The efficacy of exercise training to lower blood pressure is well-established in patients who do not have diabetes [42]. A meta-analysis of 54 randomized trials found that aerobic exercise was associated with an average reduction in blood pressure of 3.9/2.6 mm Hg across all initial blood pressure levels and was independent of body weight and race. Subgroup analysis showed an average K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 reduction of 4.9/3.7 mm Hg in hypertensive persons [43]. The degree of blood pressure reduction did not differ by frequency or intensity of exercise; this suggests that all forms are effective. This notion is supported by a recent study [44] that reported a decrease in blood pressure of about 6/6 mm Hg with 30 to 60 minutes of physical activity per week in previously sedentary hypertensive subjects. The magnitude of reduction in systolic blood pressure was about 11 mm Hg with 61 to 90 minutes of activity; however, there were no further reductions in blood pressure with further increases in amount of time spent in exercise. There did not seem to be any doseresponse relation for diastolic blood pressure. These results suggest that the volume of exercise that is required to reduce blood pressure may be modest and should be attainable by a sedentary hypertensive population. Another meta-analysis of 47 trials [45] estimated decreases in blood pressure of 6/5 mm Hg (about 4/5%) in hypertensive patients and decreases of 2/3 mm Hg (about 2/ 1%) in normotensive persons [47]. In another meta-analysis of 16 studies with walking as the intervention, normotensive and hypertensive patients decreased their blood pressure by 3/2 mm Hg (about 2%) after an average of 25 weeks [46]. In older persons who had mild or moderate hypertension who performed endurance exercise for 7 months, the reduction in systolic blood pressure was accompanied by regression of left ventricular mass and concentric left ventricular remodeling [47]. Because of differences among studies in the type, intensity, and duration of exercise; baseline blood pressure; and concomitant use of antihypertensive medications, there is wide variation in the magnitude of blood pressure reduction across studies and meta-analyses. Nonetheless, exercise training seems to reduce blood pressure to some degree. Exercise can play an important role in glycemic and blood pressure control; however, few studies have investigated the effect of physical activity on cardiovascular disease outcomes among patients who had type 2 diabetes. In the Health Professionals’ Follow-up Study [48], a large-scale epidemiologic trial, physical activity was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular death, and total mortality in men who had type 2 diabetes after 14 years of follow-up. Although no randomized exercise trials have examined the efficacy of exercise on the cardiovascular consequences of diabetes and hypertension, studies in patients who had diabetes, 571 hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or related conditions, and animal data suggest that exercise training also is a potentially efficacious treatment for improving cardiovascular health in patients who have these conditions. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: a precursor to heart failure Heart failure is a frequent consequence of type 2 diabetes, independent of coronary artery disease [49,50]. The most common feature of the diabetic heart is abnormal early left ventricular diastolic filling which suggests reduced compliance or prolonged relaxation [51]. Several mechanisms for diabetic cardiomyopathy have been proposed, including small and microvascular disease, autonomic dysfunction, metabolic derangements, and interstitial fibrosis [50]. Hypertension also is associated with impaired diastolic filling. [52] Several studies have demonstrated left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in patients who had wellcontrolled type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular complications [53–56]. Two similar studies evaluated patients who had type 2 diabetes who did not have clinical heart disease or hypertension [57,58]. Each used the Valsalva maneuver and pulmonary venous echocardiographic recordings to reveal a pseudonormal mitral flow pattern of left ventricular diastolic filling. Pseudonormalization refers to the masking of impaired left ventricular filling that is caused by a compensatory increase in left atrial pressure. Poirier et al [57] found LVDD in 28 subjects (60%), 13 of whom (28%) had a pseudonormal pattern of diastolic filling and 15 (32%) had impaired relaxation. Zabalgoitia et al [58] found LVDD in 41 subjects (47%), of which 15 (17%) had a pseudonormal-filling pattern and 26 (30%) had impaired relaxation. Thus, LVDD in patients who have type 2 diabetes may be more prevalent than the previously reported estimate of 32% [53]. Although the clinical relevance of pseudonormalization remains uncertain, this pattern denotes an advanced stage of LVDD which is a robust prognostic marker for heart failure [59]. A recent study reported an association of LVDD with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients who had type 2 diabetes who were free of clinically overt heart disease [60]. This association was seen with the impaired relaxation or pseudonormalfilling pattern of LVDD and was independent of metabolic control. LVDD is associated with reduced exercise performance in patients who have type 2 diabetes 572 K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 and normal systolic function [61,62]. The left ventricular ejection fraction response to exercise may also be impaired although resting systolic function is normal [56]. Possible causes of left ventricular dysfunction are latent global myocardial ischemia [63,64] or metabolic myocardial disturbances [51,65]. Animal data suggest that impaired myocycte handling of calcium contributes to LVDD [66]. Scheuermann-Freestone et al [67] reported that patients who have type 2 diabetes and apparently normal cardiac function at rest have impaired myocardial and skeletal muscle energy metabolism during exercise. The abnormalities in circulating metabolic substrates correlated negatively with exercise tolerance. Some studies showed a correlation of glycemic control and LVDD with treatment [68,69], whereas others did not [53,70,71]. Differences in medications, treatment duration, duration of diabetes, techniques for measuring left ventricular diastolic function, and small sample sizes contribute to the lack of agreement among studies on the efficacy of glycemic control on cardiac function. Generally, it is accepted that diabetes affects diastolic function before systolic function. Fang et al [72] used newer tissue Doppler imaging techniques to demonstrate subtle abnormalities in systolic function, in addition to diastolic function, in patients who had diabetes but not coronary disease. The same investigators also examined myocardial reflectivity—an echocardiographic finding that is indicative of collagen accumulation—and reduced myocardial strain rate—a fundamental quality of tissue that reflects its ability to shorten [73]. Patients who had diabetes but did not have left ventricular hypertrophy demonstrated evidence of abnormalities in these indices of systolic structure and function that were similar to those that were attributed to left ventricular hypertrophy alone; these were incrementally worse in patients who had both conditions. Exercise and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction The age-related decline in early diastolic filling is less pronounced in healthy, older persons who have a long history of endurance exercise compared with their sedentary peers [74,75]. Moderate-intensity aerobic and resistance exercise for 10 weeks improved LVDD in men who had mild hypertension [76]. In healthy normotensive men, 60 to 82 years of age and 24 to 32 years of age [77], aerobic training for 6 months increased early diastolic filling at rest and during acute exercise by 14%, increased left ventricular mass by 8%, and increased maximal oxygen uptake by 19%. Training also reduced elevated resting atrial filling rate in the older men by 27%. The increased left ventricular mass and improved diastolic filling represent a desirable physiologic, rather than a pathologic, hypertrophy. The mechanisms by which exercise training enhance early diastolic filling have not been elucidated fully. Twelve weeks of treadmill running reversed the age-associated decline in early diastolic filling in older rats, whereas controls did not improve [78]. Relevant to patients who have type 2 diabetes and hypertension who are at a high risk for atherosclerotic disease, the increased degree of diastolic stiffening that is due to ischemia in isolated rat hearts was not seen in the exercisetrained group. Abete et al [79] found that exercise training may restore ischemia preconditioning, a powerful endogenous cardioprotective mechanism, in the senescent rat heart through an increase of norepinephrine release. Exercise training in these animals was performed at an intensity of 70% to 85% of maximal oxygen uptake, whereas the recommended starting intensity is 40% to 70% for most patients who have type 2 diabetes [25]. Although some patients may perform a higher intensity of exercise gradually [80], it is unknown if less intensive exercise produces comparable enhancements in diastolic filling in humans. Impairment of endothelial vasodilator function Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilator function in the micro- and macrocirculation, which is mediated primarily by nitric oxide, is well-established in type 2 diabetes [81–87]. An attenuation of leg blood flow secondary to impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation was demonstrated in patients who had type 2 diabetes [88]. This mechanism may be of importance in determining the leg ischemic threshold in diabetic individuals who have peripheral arterial disease. Impairment of endothelial function also is found in patients who have hypertension [89] and was related independently to left ventricular mass in patients who had mild hypertension but who did not have left ventricular hypertrophy [90]. Endothelial dysfunction seems to be part of the metabolic syndrome, independent of hyperglycemia [91]. Some data suggest that sustained K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 hyperinsulinemia impairs nitric oxide synthesis, which may contribute to the development of insulin resistance and hypertension [92,93]. Exercise and endothelial vasodilator function Exercise increases blood flow to active muscles; the elevated shear stress on the vessel walls could be a mechanism for the increased production of endothelium-derived nitric oxide that leads to smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilation [94]. In a rat model of noninsulin-dependent diabetes [95], 16 weeks of running, but not food restriction or a sedentary condition, improved endothelial vasodilator function in the aorta—presumably because of an increase in nitric oxide—as suggested by increased urinary nitrite excretion. Regular physical activity improved endotheliumdependent vasodilation in patients who had type 1 diabetes [96], coronary artery disease [97], heart failure [98], and peripheral arterial disease [99]. In a randomized, crossover study, patients who had type 2 diabetes who performed 8 weeks of aerobic and resistance training had improved reactive hyperemic brachial artery vasodilation and forearm blood flow [100]. Because the exercise regimen avoided hand and forearm exercises, the improvements in endothelial vasodilator function can be attributed to systemic effect of exercise, rather than a local response in the exercise-trained arm. In contrast, nondiabetic subjects who also exercised had no improvement in endothelial function, despite increases in fitness [101]. In a randomized, controlled trial, exercise training improved brachial artery endothelial vasodilator function in patients who had the metabolic syndrome [102]. The 12-week program, which consisted of three weekly sessions of stationary cycling at 80% of maximal heart rate for 30 minutes, induced an increase of 18% in fitness, but no change in the baseline blood pressure of 148/95 mm Hg, BMI, insulin resistance, lipids, and big endothelin-1. The improved vasodilator function was not explained by any known atherosclerosis risk factors; this suggests that chronic exercise hyperemia may upregulate endothelial release of nitric oxide directly. In other studies, 12 weeks of brisk walking in patients who had mild to moderate hypertension improved endothelial vasodilator function through increased nitric oxide release [103,104]. Blood pressure decreased by a mean 8/4 mm Hg but the improvements in endothelial function did not correlate with blood pressure changes. 573 Besides vasomotor tone, the endothelium also regulates fibrinolysis and thrombosis, the inflammatory response, and growth of vascular smooth muscle [105]. Exercise training seems to improve endothelial function; it may be through this mechanism that exercise may improve the cardiovascular health of patients who have type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Increased arterial stiffness With aging and hypertension, the arteries stiffen from progressive degeneration of the arterial media, increased collagen and calcium content, and large artery dilation and hypertrophy [106]. Aortic stiffening is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events and recently was shown to be an independent predictor of fatal stroke in patients who had essential hypertension [107]. The process of artery stiffening is accelerated by diabetes [28,108] and insulin resistance [109]. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study [110], a large sample of middle-aged men and women, found that several indices of common carotid artery stiffness were greater in patients who had type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance compared with persons who had normal glucose tolerance. Elevated glucose, insulin, and triglycerides levels contributed to increased artery stiffness. Glycation-induced cross-linking formation in interstitial collagen seemed to contribute to arterial stiffness in aging and diabetes [111]. Structural changes, like medial degeneration, reduce arterial compliance and cause more stiffening. These factors increase the systolic blood pressure and the risk of atherosclerosis and adverse cardiovascular events. Exercise and arterial stiffness It was suggested that growth factors that are released during repeated bouts of exercise may mediate stiffness or that increases in heart rate and blood pressure during exercise condition artery walls [112]. In rats that ran on exercise wheels for 16 weeks, aortic cross-sectional compliance was higher than in sedentary animals; this indicated favorable structural adaptations to exercise [113,114]. In the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging [115], higher maximal oxygen uptake was associated with less arterial stiffness at any age and in both genders. Moreover, pulse wave velocity was decreased by 26% and carotid arterial pressure 574 K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 pulse augmentation index was decreased by 36% in men, ages 54 to 75 years who had a history of endurance training, when compared with their sedentary peers. In a similar cross-sectional study of men with a mean age of 75 years, a history of lifelong regular strenuous exercise was associated with less stiffness by the carotid arterial pressure pulse augmentation index [116]. These cross-sectional data suggest, but do not establish, cause and effect between increased fitness and reduced arterial stiffening. Conversely, in a small, randomized, crossover study of 10 patients who had isolated systolic hypertension who were aged 64 7 years, 8 weeks of cycling at 65% of maximal heart rate had no effect on large artery stiffness [117]. Although aerobic capacity and workload increased, the baseline systolic blood pressure of 154 7 mm Hg did not decrease with training. It is unknown whether established isolated systolic hypertension, a clinical manifestation of larger artery stiffening, is particularly resistant to exercise training compared with essential hypertension or whether exercise of longer than 8 weeks or of greater intensity is needed to reduce arterial stiffness. Longer-term exercise training in older men has been associated with reduced arterial stiffness [115,116]. Thus, although exercise-induced mechanisms that reduce arterial stiffness may be a potential benefit of the training response, randomized studies are needed to establish this benefit definitively. Systemic inflammation: does it underlie the development of diabetes and hypertension? In The Women’s Health Study [118], elevated C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels predicted the development of type 2 diabetes. This association was independent of BMI, family history of diabetes, smoking, exercise, alcohol use, and hormone replacement therapy. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study [119] reported that inflammation markers and endothelial dysfunction predicted the development of diabetes and obesity. In the Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease study [120], men who had C-reactive protein levels that were in the highest quartile ($2.91 mg/L) had a 2.7 times higher risk of developing diabetes. This association was not statistically significant after adjustment for BMI, smoking, and systolic blood pressure; this suggested that inflammation could be a mechanism by which known risk factors, such as obesity, smoking, and hypertension promote the development of diabetes mellitus. Creactive protein levels also are associated with many components of the metabolic syndrome [121]. In a cross-sectional study that involved 508 healthy men, elevated blood pressure was associated with inflammation markers [122]. Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [123] suggest that increases in pulse pressure are associated with elevated Creactive protein levels among healthy adults, independent of blood pressure. Thus, the chronic activation of the immune system may be a common adverse mechanism among cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Exercise and inflammation In the Cardiovascular Health Study [124], higher self-reported physical activity was associated with lower concentrations of several inflammation markers, independent of gender, cardiovascular disease, age, race, smoking, BMI, diabetes, and hypertension. In recent data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III [125], regular participants in jogging and aerobic dancing were less likely to have elevated cardiovascular markers, independent of age, race, sex, BMI, smoking, and health status. C-reactive protein levels were reduced after 9 months in distance runners but not in sedentary controls, which suggested that exercise has a systemic anti-inflammatory effect [126]. In patients who had chronic heart failure, 12 weeks of moderate-intensity cycling for 30 minutes, 5 days per week, improved exercise tolerance and attenuated peripheral inflammatory markers reflecting monocyte/macrophage–endothelial cell interactions [127]. In a recent study, exercise training significantly reduced the local expression of tumor necrosis factor-a, interleukin-1b, and interleukin6 in the skeletal muscle of patients who had chronic heart failure who exercised for 6 months; measurements in controls did not change [128]. There also was a reduction in the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase and intracellular accumulation of nitric oxide which was suggestive of less oxidative stress. Inflammatory markers also were reduced in patients who had peripheral arterial disease after 6 months of walking; this also improved claudication symptoms [129]. In a randomized, controlled trial program that K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 aimed to reduce body weight in premenopausal obese women, the intervention, which consisted of a low calorie diet and increased physical activity, was associated with a reduction in markers of vascular inflammation and insulin resistance [130]. Although direct data about the effects of exercise training on the inflammatory process in patients who have diabetes and hypertension are lacking, the available evidence suggests that a reduction in systemic inflammation is an important feature of the training response. Exercise and lipoproteins Patients who have type 2 diabetes have a dyslipidemia that is characterized by increases in atherogenic small, dense, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions and serum triglycerides and decreases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-2 cholesterol [131]. After a 4-week program of exercise training and reduced calorie diet in patients who had type 2 diabetes, reductions in body weight and improvements in glycemic control were associated with reductions in serum cholesterol and apolipoprotein B concentrations in very low-density lipoprotein, intermediate-density lipoprotein, and small, dense (>1.040 g/mL) LDL particles [132]. Thus, lifestyle interventions, including exercise, seem to improve the LDL subfraction profile with a decrease in small, dense LDL particles and may protect against cardiovascular disease, despite a lack of reduction of total or LDL cholesterol. Because the amount of exercise training, rather than the intensity of exercise, may be a more important determinant of lipoprotein particle size, it is important for patients to engage in frequent and regular exercise [133]. The role of body composition and fat distribution The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes is correlated highly with the prevalence of obesity [134]. Based on data from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [135], the prevalence of obesity (BMI $30) 19.8% in 2000 and was 20.9% in 2001 (an increase of 5.6%), whereas the prevalence of diabetes increased to 7.9% from 7.3% (an increase of 8.2%). The prevalence of BMI of 40 or higher in 2001 was 2.3%. Overweight and obesity were associated significantly with diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, asthma, arthritis, and poor health status. In the Nurse’s Health Study [39], during 6 years of follow-up, sedentary 575 behaviors, especially TV watching, were associated with significantly elevated risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes, whereas even light to moderate activity was associated with substantially lower risk. Besides total fat, abdominal obesity is an independent predictor of diabetes and hypertension [136–139] and may play a role in the development of cardiovascular abnormalities. A recent study found that intra-abdominal adiposity predicted coronary artery calcium scores in persons who had insulin resistance, independent of blood pressure, HDL, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, insulin resistance, or b-cell function [140]. In another study, impaired endothelial vasodilator function was predicted by abdominal obesity, independent of total body weight, blood pressure, and metabolic parameters [141]. Because visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues are the major sources of cytokines (adipokines), increased adipose tissue is associated with alteration in adipokine production, such as overexpression of tumor necrosis factor-a, interleukin-6, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and underexpression of adiponectin in adipose tissue [87]. The proinflammatory status that is associated with these changes also provides a potential link between insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and type 2 diabetes. Exercise and body composition The exercise training–induced improvements in glycemic control can occur independent of changes in total body weight. Because few studies report body mass in terms of lean and fat mass, or visceral fat, it is uncertain if glycemic changes are independent of reductions in fat mass or increases in lean tissue. Studies in persons who did not have diabetes showed that increased fitness and activity may reduce abdominal fat [137,142,143]; limited data suggest a preferential loss of abdominal visceral fat with exercise training [143,144]. A recent randomized trial in sedentary, overweight, postmenopausal women, a group who is at high risk for diabetes, showed that exercise training without diet for 12 months resulted in a 4.2% loss in total body fat and a 6.9% loss of intra-abdominal visceral fat [145]. A significant dose response for greater body fat loss was observed with increasing duration of exercise. Walking was the activity that was reported most frequently. In a randomized trial of patients who had type 2 diabetes, patients who performed highintensity aerobic exercise three times per week for 2 months increased aerobic capacity by 41% and 576 K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 insulin sensitivity by 46% [80]. Although there was no change in total body weight with exercise training, there was a 48% loss of abdominal visceral fat and an 18% loss of abdominal subcutaneous fat. The change in visceral fat correlated highly with improved insulin sensitivity. Obese women who did not have diabetes who performed moderate-intensity aerobic exercise four to five times a week for 14 months increased fitness and decreased body fat mass, with a greater loss of abdominal fat compared with midthigh fat [146]. A key finding was that the reduction in the insulinogenic index correlated with reductions in total fat mass and deep abdominal fat, but not with changes in fitness. Thus, the reduction of abdominal obesity, either independently or in combination with changes in total fat, is an important benefit of exercise training. These changes in body composition and fat distribution are associated with decreases in blood pressure and improvements in glycemic control and they may play a role in improving the cardiovascular consequences of type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Guidelines for exercise training Generally, exercise is considered to be a standard of care for glycemic control and blood pressure reduction. Based on scientific evidence and expert opinion, exercise guidelines have been published by the American College of Sports Medicine for type 2 diabetes [25] and for hypertension [147]. Guidelines from the American Diabetes Association can be found in their Handbook of Exercise in Diabetes [148]. The key recommendations that are applicable to patients without significant health complications or limitations are summarized in Box 1. Because patients who have diabetes and hypertension often have concomitant clinical or occult coronary artery disease, adverse cardiovascular and physiologic responses during exercise training are possible. The American Diabetes Association [149] and ATP III guidelines [150] consider diabetes as a coronary artery disease risk equivalent. The prevalence of silent myocardial ischemia in patients who have type 2 diabetes can be as high as 20% to 25%, especially in patients who are older than 60 years [151] or when the duration of diabetes is more than 10 years and there is the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors [152]. Thus, patients should undergo exercise stress testing before initiating a moderate- intensity exercise program or greater to identify ischemia, arrhythmias, anginal thresholds, and patients who have asymptomatic ischemia [153–155]. Exercise testing also provides data about heart rate and blood pressure responses for establishing an appropriate exercise prescription. Patients should expend a minimum cumulative 1000 Kcal per week in aerobic exercise and participate in resistance training for improving fitness and body composition, reducing blood pressure, and controlling blood glucose levels [156,157]. Most patients can meet this level by exercising 3 days per week, whereas more frequent sessions are recommended when weight loss is a goal. Each exercise session should include 5 to 10 minutes of warm-up and 5 to 10 minutes of cool-down activities. Appropriate activities for these phases are calisthenics, range of motion, and low intensity aerobic exercise that allow for gradual transition to and from the higher metabolic demands of the main aerobic phase of the exercise session. Walking, cycling, and swimming are examples of aerobic activity; they should be increased gradually in duration to last for 30 to 45 minutes to reach energy expenditure recommendations [155]. Heart rate is the primary guide for aerobic exercise intensity and can be monitored by manually counting the pulse or with a heart rate monitor. The target heart rate for exercise is typically set at 60% to 90% of the maximum heart rate for healthy adults [155]. For patients who have diabetes and hypertension and other risk factors, such as smoking, hyperlipidemia, and obesity that further increase their cardiovascular disease risk, a target heart rate that corresponds to 55% to 79% of maximum heart rate is used instead [155]. The maximal heart rate can be obtained from exercise testing [153]. In the absence of exercise testing and for patients whose heart rate response is not limited by medications or autonomic neuropathy [154] or a cardiac pacemaker, the maximal heart rate can be estimated from age using the formula: 220age ¼ maximum heart beats per minute ðbpmÞ For example, the age-predicted maximal heart rate for a 60-year old is calculated as 220 60 ¼ 160 bpm. If the individual has uncomplicated diabetes, the target heart rate range would be 55% to 79% of 160 bpm, or 88 to 126 bpm. In patients who have a low initial level of fitness, the target heart rate can be set at 50% to 60% of maximum and increased as tolerated. A lower heart K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 577 Box 1. Guidelines for exercise training in persons who have diabetes and hypertension Warm-up and cool down period of 5 to 10 minutes each Stretching, calisthenics, low-level aerobic exercise (eg, walking or cycling) Types of exercise Aerobic exercise consists of activities like walking, cycling, swimming, rowing. Resistance exercise consists of weight lifting. Machines are preferred for safety and ease of use; hand-held weights, barbells, and elastic bands also can be used. Intensity Aerobic exercise at 55% to 79% of maximal heart rate for most patients who have type 2 diabetes; 50% to 60% of maximal heart rate for patients who have low initial level of fitness. Resistance (weight) training, 8 to 10 exercises at 30% to 50% of 1-repetition maximum. A minimum of 1 set of 12 to 15 repetitions; increase workload when 15 repetitions can be done without difficulty. Duration Aerobic exercise for 30 to 45 minutes. Resistance training takes about 20 minutes for 1 set each for 8 to 10 exercises. Frequency Aerobic exercise should be done three to four times per week. Resistance exercise should be done at least twice per week. It is recommended that individualized exercise prescriptions be based on the results of exercise stress testing. See text, ACSM Position Stand on Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes [25], and the American Diabetes Association Handbook of Exercise in Diabetes [148] for exercise precautions. rate range also may be necessary for patients who have autonomic neuropathy, which limits the heart rate response during exercise. The use of b-blockers and abnormal exercise stress test findings, such as ischemic ECG changes, require individualized adjustment of the target heart rate because the general guidelines do not apply. Although b-blockers attenuated the heart rate response during exercise, they did not generally preclude an improvement in aerobic and muscle fitness [158]. The American College of Sports Medicine [25] and the American Heart Association, in its Scientific Advisory on Resistance Training in Individuals With and Without Cardiovascular Disease [159], recommend resistance training, when appropriately prescribed and supervised. Resistance training produces beneficial effects on muscular strength and endurance, cardiovascular function, metabolism, coronary risk factors, and psychosocial well-being. The American Diabetes Association advises the use of light to moderate weights and high repetitions for maintaining or enhancing upper body strength in nearly all patients who have diabetes [160]. For the elderly patient who has diabetes, light-intensity resistance training has positive effects on bone density, osteoarthritic symptoms, mobility impairment, and self-efficacy [161]. It also alleviates symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia in individuals who have clinical depression [161]. Resistance training should be performed at least twice per week, with a typical workout consisting of a minimum of 1 set of 8 to 10 exercises to cover the large muscle groups of the upper and lower body [162]. If maximal muscle strength testing is available, 1-repetition maximum evaluation can be performed to determine the patient’s initial level of strength [163]. The weight intensity for subsequent workouts are set at a moderate level, which corresponds to a load of 30% to 50% of maximum strength. At a moderate intensity, the patient should be able to perform 12 to 15 repetitions. For example, if the 1-repetition maximum for a given exercise is 100 pounds, the weight lifted during the workout is 30 pounds to 50 pounds and it should be lifted 12 to 15 times. 578 K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 When 15 repetitions of an exercise can be completed without difficulty, the weight should be increased by 5 pounds to 10 pounds to assure a progressive muscle overload [162]. If muscle strength testing is not done, the individual can select an initial weight that can be lifted with moderate difficulty approximately 10 to 15 times [159,164]. Weight machines are recommended for their ease of use and safety. Alternatively, if the initial load on a particular machine is too heavy or machines are not available, hand weights, barbells, or elastic bands can be used instead. Studies in patients who have type 2 diabetes are needed to determine if they should be performing more intense or frequent resistance training than the current recommendations because of the potential benefit of resistance training for increasing muscle mass and reducing fat mass [35]. Exercise precautions The risk-benefit of exercise is highly favorable for most patients who have diabetes and hypertension; however, some precautions are warranted (Table 1). Moderate or severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure $160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure $100 mm Hg) should be controlled to lower levels before starting an exercise program [165]. An exercise stress test should be performed to rule out ischemia, complex arrhythmias, and symptoms. Although contraindications to exercise based on glycemic control have been established for type 1 diabetes [148], guidelines for type 2 diabetes are less definitive. Badenhop et al [166] evaluated exercising patients who had type 2 diabetes and baseline glucose levels that ranged from 60 mg/dL to 400 mg/dL. Patients who used insulin were excluded. In more than 550 cases, there was no episode of ketosis or hypoglycemia in the 24 hours after exercise and the occurrence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose <60 mg/dL) during exercise was 2%. Thus, patients who have type 2 diabetes who do not use insulin may not need to have their blood glucose checked routinely when exercising. Supplementary food should be available, but it usually is not required unless the exercise session is exceptionally vigorous and of long duration [25]. Patients who use insulin should be encouraged to exercise and be given Table 1 Diabetic complications and comorbidities and precautions for exercise Complication Pathophysiology Clinical signs/symptoms Exercise precaution Myocardial ischemia, acute coronary syndrome, cardiac arrhythmias Macrovascular and microvascular atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction Retinopathy, background or active proliferative retinopathy Angina, dyspnea, silent ischemia is common Consider graded exercise test Ophthalmic examination Foot injury Neuropathy and peripheral artery disease Degenerative joint disease, foot ulcers, poor peripheral pulses Orthostatic hypotension Autonomic dysfunction Peripheral artery disease Macrovascular disease Nephropathy Vascular disease, glomerulorsclerosis Depressed blood pressure and heart rate response to exercise, low heart rate variability Intermittent claudication, resting claudication, diminished peripheral pulses Proteinuria, hypertension Avoid high-intensity exercises, rapid head movements, head down maneuvers, and Valsalva maneuvers, especially during resistance training Wear proper footwear, engage in low-impact exercise, perform daily examination of feet Longer warm-up periods, lower intensity activities Retinal hemorrhage Walk to pain tolerance, intersperse exercise with periods of rest Avoid increasing systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg during exercise K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 instructions about blood glucose monitoring, insulin dosing, and supplementary foods. Guidelines for exercise training in patients who use insulin can be found elsewhere [167]. To minimize excessive blood pressure responses, patients should be told to maintain normal controlled breathing while performing resistance training. Although short periods of breath holding are unavoidable at higher exercise intensities, extended breath holding should be avoided. Precautions for patients who have diabetic peripheral and autonomic neuropathy [25,148] and peripheral arterial disease [168] are discussed elsewhere. There is no evidence that properly prescribed exercise worsens diabetic retinopathy and it may reduce or delay the risk of eye complications by reducing blood pressure, increasing HDL cholesterol [169], and increasing fitness [170]. Because of a concern for 579 vitreous hemorrhage or traction retinal detachment retinopathy, exercise that involves straining, such as heavy resistance training, should be avoided in patients who have active proliferative diabetic retinopathy or moderate or worse nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. The exact threshold for this risk is unknown [169]. Whether patients who have had laser or surgical procedures for diabetic retinopathy can undertake more vigorous resistive exercise is unknown. Summary Exercise training is an essential component in the medical management of patients who have type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Regular exercise improves the cardiovascular health of individuals who have these conditions through multiple Decreases blood glucose Increases insulin sensitivity Decreases blood pressure Decreases total body fat and abdominal obesity Increases lean body mass Increases aerobic capacity and muscle strength Exercise Training Improves endothelial vasodilator function Improves left ventricular diastolic function Decreases arterial stiffness Decreases systemic inflammation Fig. 1. Overview of the potential beneficial effects of exercise training in diabetes and hypertension. In addition to the well-established improvements in glycemic control, blood pressure levels, and fitness, exercise training also contributes to improvements in the cardiovascular consequences of type 2 diabetes and hypertension. 580 K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 mechanisms (Fig. 1). These mechanisms include improvements in endothelial vasodilator function, left ventricular diastolic function, arterial stiffness, systematic inflammation, and reducing left ventricular mass. Exercise training also reduces total and abdominal fat, which mediate improvements in insulin sensitivity and blood pressure, and possibly, endothelial function. Persons who are in a prediabetic stage or those who have the metabolic syndrome may be able to prevent or delay the progression to overt diabetes by adopting a healthier lifestyle, of which increasing habitual levels of physical activity is a vital component. Most persons who have diabetes and hypertension or are at risk for these conditions should be able to initiate an exercise program safely after appropriate medical screening and the establishment of an individualized exercise prescription. Despite the increasing amount of evidence that shows the benefits of exercise training, this modality of prevention and treatment continues to be underused. Although patients’ lack of knowledge of the benefits of exercise or lack of motivation contributes to this underuse, a lack of clear and specific guidelines from health care professionals also is an important factor. Clinicians need to educate patients about the benefits of exercise for managing their type 2 diabetes and assist in formulating specific advice for increasing physical activity. Specific instructions should be given to patients, rather than general advice, such as ‘‘you should exercise more often.’’ Many cardiac rehabilitation and clinical exercise programs can accommodate patients who have type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Such programs can establish individualized exercise prescriptions and provide an environment that is conducive for ‘‘lifestyle change’’ that underlies long-term compliance to exercise and risk factor modification. References [1] Porte D Jr, Kahn SE. Mechanisms for hyperglycemia in type II diabetes mellitus: therapeutic implications for sulfonylurea treatment–an update. Am J Med 1991;90(6A):8S–14S. [2] Kahn CR. Banting Lecture. Insulin action, diabetogenes, and the cause of type II diabetes. Diabetes 1994;43(8):1066–84. [3] Hsueh WC, Mitchell BD, Aburomia R, Pollin T, Sakul H, Gelder Ehm M, et al. Diabetes in the Old Order Amish: characterization and heritability analysis of the Amish Family Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2000;23(5):595–601. [4] Kahn CR, Vicent D, Doria A. Genetics of noninsulin-dependent (type-II) diabetes mellitus. Annu Rev Med 1996;47:509–31. [5] Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288(14):1723–7. [6] Crespo CJ, Keteyian SJ, Heath GW, Sempos CT. Leisure-time physical activity among US adults. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(1):93–8. [7] Report of the Expert Committee On The Diagnosis And Classification Of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):S5–20. [8] Benjamin SM, Valdez R, Geiss LS, Rolka DB, Narayan KM. Estimated number of adults with prediabetes in the US in 2000: opportunities for prevention. Diabetes Care 2003;26(3):645–9. [9] de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Jager A, Hienkens E, Kostense PJ, Stehouwer CD, et al. Relation of impaired fasting and postload glucose with incident type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population: The Hoorn Study. JAMA 2001;285(16):2109–13. [10] Saydah SH, Loria CM, Eberhardt MS, Brancati FL. Subclinical states of glucose intolerance and risk of death in the US. Diabetes Care 2001;24(3):447–53. [11] Brotman DJ, Girod JP. The metabolic syndrome: a tug-of-war with no winner. Cleve Clin J Med 2002;69(12):990–4. [12] Ferrannini E, Haffner SM, Mitchell BD, Stern MP. Hyperinsulinaemia: the key feature of a cardiovascular and metabolic syndrome. Diabetologia 1991; 34(6):416–22. [13] DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance. A multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 1991;14(3):173–94. [14] Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285(19):2486–97. [15] Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US Population From the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(4):427–36. [16] Keller KB, Lemberg L. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Crit Care 2003;12(2):167–70. [17] Morgan CL, Currie CJ, Stott NC, Smithers M, Butler CC, Peters JR. The prevalence of multiple diabetes-related complications. Diabet Med 2000; 17(2):146–51. [18] Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): pro- K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] spective observational study. BMJ 2000;321(7258): 405–12. Marks JB, Raskin P. Cardiovascular risk in diabetes: a brief review. J Diabetes Complications 2000; 14(2):108–15. Blendea MC, McFarlane SI, Isenovic ER, Gick G, Sowers JR. Heart disease in diabetic patients. Curr Diab Rep 2003;3(3):223–9. Wilson PW, Kannel WB. Obesity, diabetes, and risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2002;11(2):119–23, 125. DeFronzo RA. Insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and coronary artery disease: a complex metabolic web. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1992;20(Suppl 11):S1–16. Sowers JR. Obesity and cardiovascular disease. Clin Chem 1998;44(8 Pt 2):1821–5. Garvey WT, Hermayer KL. Clinical implications of the insulin resistance syndrome. Clin Cornerstone 1998;1(3):13–28. Albright A, Franz M, Hornsby G, Kriska A, Marrero D, Ullrich I, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32(7):1345–60. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289(19):2560–72. Grossman E, Messerli FH, Goldbourt U. High blood pressure and diabetes mellitus: are all antihypertensive drugs created equal? Arch Intern Med 2000;160(16):2447–52. Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Paranicas M, O’Grady MJ, Lee ET, Welty TK, et al. Impact of diabetes on cardiac structure and function: the strong heart study. Circulation 2000;101(19):2271–6. Huang ES, Meigs JB, Singer DE. The effect of interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2001;111(8):633–42. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group report on hypertension in diabetes. Hypertension 1994;23(2):145–58 [discussion 159–160]. Zanchetti A, Hansson L, Clement D, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, Rosenthal T, et al. Benefits and risks of more intensive blood pressure lowering in hypertensive patients of the HOT study with different risk profiles: does a J-shaped curve exist in smokers? J Hypertens 2003;21(4):797–804. American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2002. Diabetes Care 2002; 24(Suppl 1):S64–8. Gregg EW, Gerzoff RB, Caspersen CJ, Williamson DF, Narayan KM. Relationship of walking to mortality among US adults with diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(12):1440–7. 581 [34] Henriksen EJ. Invited review: effects of acute exercise and exercise training on insulin resistance. J Appl Physiol 2002;93(2):788–96. [35] Boule NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP, Wells GA, Sigal RJ. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a metaanalysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 2001; 286(10):1218–27. [36] Kelley DE, Goodpaster BH. Effects of exercise on glucose homeostasis in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33(6 Suppl):S495–501. [37] Laaksonen DE, Lakka HM, Salonen JT, Niskanen LK, Rauramaa R, Lakka TA. Low levels of leisuretime physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness predict development of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2002;25(9):1612–8. [38] Mayer-Davis EJ, D’Agostino R Jr, Karter AJ, Haffner SM, Rewers MJ, Saad M, et al. Intensity and amount of physical activity in relation to insulin sensitivity: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1998;279(9):669–74. [39] Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE. Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 2003; 289(14):1785–91. [40] Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(6):393–403. [41] Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001;344(18):1343–50. [42] Stewart K. Exercise and hypertension. In: Roitman J, editor. ACSM’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 4th Edition. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott, Williams and Wilkens; 2001. [43] Whelton SP, Chin A, Xin X, He J. Effect of aerobic exercise on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136(7):493–503. [44] Ishikawa-Takata K, Ohta T, Tanaka H. How much exercise is required to reduce blood pressure in essential hypertensives: a dose-response study. Am J Hypertens 2003;16(8):629–33. [45] Kelley GA, Kelley KA, Tran ZV. Aerobic exercise and resting blood pressure: a meta-analytic review of randomized, controlled trials. Prev Cardiol 2001;4(2):73–80. [46] Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV. Walking and resting blood pressure in adults: a meta-analysis. Prev Med 2001;33(2 Pt 1):120–7. [47] Turner MJ, Spina RJ, Kohrt WM, Ehsani AA. Effect of endurance exercise training on left ventricular size and remodeling in older adults with 582 [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 hypertension. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55(4):M245–51. Tanasescu M, Leitzmann MF, Rimm EB, Hu FB. Physical activity in relation to cardiovascular disease and total mortality among men with type 2 diabetes. Circulation 2003;107(19):2435–9. Fein FS. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes Care 1990;13(11):1169–79. Spector KS. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. Clin Cardiol 1998;21(12):885–7. Uusitupa MI, Mustonen JN, Airaksinen KE. Diabetic heart muscle disease. Ann Med 1990;22(6): 377–86. Missault LH, Duprez DA, Brandt AA, de Buyzere ML, Adang LT, Clement DL. Exercise performance and diastolic filling in essential hypertension. Blood Press 1993;2(4):284–8. Tarumi N, Iwasaka T, Takahashi N, Sugiura T, Morita Y, Sumimoto T, et al. Left ventricular diastolic filling properties in diabetic patients during isometric exercise. Cardiology 1993;83(5–6): 316–23. Takenaka K, Sakamoto T, Amano K, Oku J, Fujinami K, Murakami T, et al. Left ventricular filling determined by Doppler echocardiography in diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 1988;61(13): 1140–3. Robillon JF, Sadoul JL, Jullien D, Morand P, Freychet P. Abnormalities suggestive of cardiomyopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes of relatively short duration. Diabete Metab 1994;20(5): 473–80. Yasuda I, Kawakami K, Shimada T, Tanigawa K, Murakami R, Izumi S, et al. Systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction in middle-aged asymptomatic non-insulin-dependent diabetics. J Cardiol 1992;22(2–3):427–38. Poirier P, Bogaty P, Garneau C, Marois L, Dumesnil JG. Diastolic dysfunction in normotensive men with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: importance of maneuvers in echocardiographic screening for preclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes Care 2001;24(1):5–10. Zabalgoitia M, Ismaeil MF, Anderson L, Maklady FA. Prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in normotensive, asymptomatic patients with wellcontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2001;87(3):320–3. Rakowski H, Appleton C, Chan KL, Dumesnil JG, Honos G, Jue J, et al. Canadian consensus recommendations for the measurement and reporting of diastolic dysfunction by echocardiography: from the Investigators of Consensus on Diastolic Dysfunction by Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996;9(5):736–60. Poirier P, Bogaty P, Philippon F, Garneau C, Fortin C, Dumesnil JG. Preclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy: relation of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction to cardiac autonomic neuropathy in [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] men with uncomplicated well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Metabolism 2003;52(8):1056–61. Poirier P, Garneau C, Bogaty P, Nadeau A, Marois L, Brochu C, et al. Impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on maximal treadmill performance in normotensive subjects with wellcontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2000;85(4):473–7. Irace L, Iarussi D, Guadagno I, De Rimini ML, Lucca P, Spadaro P, et al. Left ventricular function and exercise tolerance in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Clin Cardiol 1998;21(8): 567–71. Yamada J, Tanaka S, Sato T, Suzuki R, Fujii S. The medical evaluation of patients with diabetes mellitus in exercise therapy. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 1991;37(Suppl):S17–24. Langer A, Freeman MR, Josse RG, Steiner G, Armstrong PW. Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67(13):1073–8. Sachs RN, Attali JR, Crepin F, Palsky D, Lancrenon S, Tellier P, et al. Existence of asymptomatic changes in left ventricular function in the diabetic. Noninvasive study. Rev Med Interne 1985;6(1): 68–76. Lagadic-Gossmann D, Buckler KJ, Le Prigent K, Feuvray D. Altered Ca2þ handling in ventricular myocytes isolated from diabetic rats. Am J Physiol 1996;270(5 Pt 2):H1529–37. Scheuermann-Freestone M, Madsen PL, Manners D, Blamire AM, Buckingham RE, Styles P, et al. Abnormal cardiac and skeletal muscle energy metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes. Circulation 2003;107(24):3040–6. Uusitupa M, Siitonen O, Aro A, Korhonen T, Pyorala K. Effect of correction of hyperglycemia on left ventricular function in non-insulindependent (type 2) diabetics. Acta Med Scand 1983;213(5):363–8. Hirai J, Ueda K, Takegoshi T, Mabuchi H. Effects of metabolic control on ventricular function in type 2 diabetic patients. Intern Med 1992;31(6):725–30. Gough SC, Smyllie J, Barker M, Berkin KE, Rice PJ, Grant PJ. Diastolic dysfunction is not related to changes in glycaemic control over 6 months in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. A cross-sectional study. Acta Diabetol 1995;32(2): 110–5. Beljic T, Miric M. Improved metabolic control does not reverse left ventricular filling abnormalities in newly diagnosed non-insulin-dependent diabetes patients. Acta Diabetol 1994;31(3):147–50. Fang ZY, Najos-Valencia O, Leano R, Marwick TH. Patients with early diabetic heart disease demonstrate a normal myocardial response to dobutamine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42(3):446–53. Fang ZY, Yuda S, Anderson V, Short L, Case C, Marwick TH. Echocardiographic detection of early K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] diabetic myocardial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41(4):611–7. Takemoto KA, Bernstein L, Lopez JF, Marshak D, Rahimtoola SH, Chandraratna PA. Abnormalities of diastolic filling of the left ventricle associated with aging are less pronounced in exercise-trained individuals. Am Heart J 1992;124(1):143–8. Forman DE, Manning WJ, Hauser R, Gervino EV, Evans WJ, Wei JY. Enhanced left ventricular diastolic filling associated with long-term endurance training. J Gerontol 1992;47(2):M56–8. Kelemen MH, Effron MB, Valenti SA, Stewart KJ. Exercise training combined with antihypertensive drug therapy: effects on lipids, blood pressure, and left ventricular mass. JAMA 1990;263(7): 2766–71. Levy WC, Cerqueira MD, Abrass IB, Schwartz RS, Stratton JR. Endurance exercise training augments diastolic filling at rest and during exercise in healthy young and older men. Circulation 1993;88(1):116–26. Brenner DA, Apstein CS, Saupe KW. Exercise training attenuates age-associated diastolic dysfunction in rats. Circulation 2001;104(2):221–6. Abete P, Calabrese C, Ferrara N, Cioppa A, Pisanelli P, Cacciatore F, et al. Exercise training restores ischemic preconditioning in the aging heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(2):643–50. Mourier A, Gautier JF, De Kerviler E, Bigard AX, Villette JM, Garnier JP, et al. Mobilization of visceral adipose tissue related to the improvement in insulin sensitivity in response to physical training in NIDDM. Effects of branched-chain amino acid supplements. Diabetes Care 1997;20(3):385–91. MCVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Johnston GD, MCDermott BJ, MCGrath LT, Henry WR, et al. Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation in patients with type 2 (non-insulindependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1992; 35(8):771–6. Johnstone MT, Creager SJ, Scales KM, Cusco JA, Lee BK, Creager MA. Impaired endotheliumdependent vasodilation in patients with insulindependent diabetes mellitus. Circulation 1993; 88(6):2510–6. Clarkson P, Celermajer DS, Donald AE, Sampson M, Sorensen KE, Adams M, et al. Impaired vascular reactivity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is related to disease duration and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28(3):573–9. Tomoike H, Shiga R, Abe S, Kojima K, Hirono O, Kubota I. Impaired hyperemic response of brachial artery with the presence of diabetes mellitus in patients with coronary artery disease: a preliminary study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1996;30(Suppl): 55–9. Williams SB, Cusco JA, Roddy MA, Johnstone MT, Creager MA. Impaired nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in patients with non-insulin- [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] 583 dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27(3):567–74. Caballero AE, Arora S, Saouaf R, Lim SC, Smakowski P, Park JY, et al. Microvascular and macrovascular reactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 1999;48(9):1856–62. Aldhahi W, Hamdy O. Adipokines, inflammation, and the endothelium in diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2003;3(4):293–8. Kingwell BA, Formosa M, Muhlmann M, Bradley SJ, MCConell GK. Type 2 diabetic individuals have impaired leg blood flow responses to exercise: role of endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Diabetes Care 2003;26(3):899–904. Brush JE, Faxon DP, Salmon S, Jacobs AK, Ryan TJ. Abnormal endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion in hypertensive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:809–15. Sung J, Ouyang P, Bacher AC, Turner KL, DeRegis JR, Hees PS, et al. Peripheral endotheliumdependent flow-mediated vasodilatation is associated with left ventricular mass in older persons with hypertension. Am Heart J 2002;144(1):39–44. Baron AD. Vascular reactivity. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84(1A):25J–7J. Scherrer U, Sartori C. Defective nitric oxide synthesis: a link between metabolic insulin resistance, sympathetic overactivity and cardiovascular morbidity. Eur J Endocrinol 2000;142(4):315–23. Fang TC, Wu CC, Huang WC. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis accentuates blood pressure elevation in hyperinsulinemic rats. J Hypertens 2001; 19(7):1255–62. MCAllister RM, Hirai T, Musch TI. Contribution of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (EDNO) to the skeletal muscle blood flow response to exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27(8):1145–51. Sakamoto S, Minami K, Niwa Y, Ohnaka M, Nakaya Y, Mizuno A, et al. Effect of exercise training and food restriction on endothelium-dependent relaxation in the Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rat, a model of spontaneous NIDDM. Diabetes 1998;47(1):82–6. Fuchsjager-Mayrl G, Pleiner J, Wiesinger GF, Sieder AE, Quittan M, Nuhr MJ, et al. Exercise training improves vascular endothelial function in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(10):1795–801. Hambrecht R, Adams V, Erbs S, Linke A, Krankel N, Shu Y, et al. Regular physical activity improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease by increasing phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 2003;107(25):3152–8. Hambrecht R, Fiehn E, Weigl C, Gielen S, Hamann C, Kaiser R, et al. Regular physical exercise corrects endothelial dysfunction and improves exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 1998;98(24):2709–15. 584 K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 [99] Brendle DC, Joseph LJ, Corretti MC, Gardner AW, Katzel LI. Effects of exercise rehabilitation on endothelial reactivity in older patients with peripheral arterial disease. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87(3):324–9. [100] Maiorana A, O’Driscoll G, Cheetham C, Dembo L, Stanton K, Goodman C, et al. The effect of combined aerobic and resistance exercise training on vascular function in type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38(3):860–6. [101] Maiorana A, O’Driscoll G, Dembo L, Goodman C, Taylor R, Green D. Exercise training, vascular function, and functional capacity in middle-aged subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33(12):2022–8. [102] Lavrencic A, Salobir BG, Keber I. Physical training improves flow-mediated dilation in patients with the polymetabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20(2):551–5. [103] Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Kurisu S, Yoshimizu A, Sasaki N, Matsuura H, et al. Regular aerobic exercise augments endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in normotensive as well as hypertensive subjects: role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Circulation 1999;100(11):1194–202. [104] Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Sasaki N, Nakagawa K, Ueda T, Yoshimizu A, et al. Daily aerobic exercise improves reactive hyperemia in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension 1999;33(1 Pt 2): 591–7. [105] Paterick TE, Fletcher GF. Endothelial function and cardiovascular prevention: role of blood lipids, exercise, and other risk factors. Cardiol Rev 2001; 9(5):282–6. [106] London GM, Guerin A. Influence of arterial pulse and reflective waves on systolic blood pressure and cardiac function. J Hypertens Suppl 1999;17(2): S3–6. [107] Laurent S, Katsahian S, Fassot C, Tropeano AI, Gautier I, Laloux B, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension. Stroke 2003;34(5):1203–6. [108] Cockcroft JR, Webb DJ, Wilkinson IB. Arterial stiffness, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. J Hum Hypertens 2000;14(6):377–80. [109] Osei K. Insulin resistance and systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1999;84(1A):33J–6J. [110] Salomaa V, Riley W, Kark JD, Nardo C, Folsom AR. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and fasting glucose and insulin concentrations are associated with arterial stiffness indexes. The ARIC Study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Circulation 1995;91(5):1432–43. [111] Kuzuya M, Asai T, Kanda S, Maeda K, Cheng XW, Iguchi A. Glycation cross-links inhibit matrix metalloproteinase-2 activation in vascular smooth muscle cells cultured on collagen lattice. Diabetologia 2001;44(4):433–6. [112] Hodes RJ, Lakatta EG, MCNeil CT. Another modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease? [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] Some evidence points to arterial stiffness. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43(5):581–2. Kingwell BA, Arnold PJ, Jennings GL, Dart AM. Spontaneous running increases aortic compliance in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Cardiovasc Res 1997;35(1): 132–7. Kingwell BA, Arnold PJ, Jennings GL, Dart AM. The effects of voluntary running on cardiac mass and aortic compliance in Wistar-Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 1998; 16(2):181–5. Vaitkevicius PV, Fleg JL, Engel JH, O’Connor FC, Wright JG, Lakatta LE, et al. Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation 1993;88(4 Pt 1):1456–62. Jensen-Urstad K, Bouvier F, Jensen-Urstad M. Preserved vascular reactivity in elderly male athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1999;9(2):88–91. Ferrier KE, Waddell TK, Gatzka CD, Cameron JD, Dart AM, Kingwell BA. Aerobic exercise training does not modify large-artery compliance in isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension 2001;38(2):222–6. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2001;286(3):327–34. Duncan BB, Schmidt MI. Chronic activation of the innate immune system may underlie the metabolic syndrome. Sao Paulo Med J 2001;119(3): 122–7. Thorand B, Lowel H, Schneider A, Kolb H, Meisinger C, Frohlich M, et al. C-reactive protein as a predictor for incident diabetes mellitus among middle-aged men: results from the MONICA Augsburg cohort study, 1984–1998. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(1):93–9. Tamakoshi K, Yatsuya H, Kondo T, Hori Y, Ishikawa M, Zhang H, et al. The metabolic syndrome is associated with elevated circulating Creactive protein in healthy reference range, a systemic low-grade inflammatory state. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27(4):443–9. Chae CU, Lee RT, Rifai N, Ridker PM. Blood pressure and inflammation in apparently healthy men. Hypertension 2001;38(3):399–403. Abramson JL, Weintraub WS, Vaccarino V. Association between pulse pressure and C-reactive protein among apparently healthy US adults. Hypertension 2002;39(2):197–202. Geffken D, Cushman M, Burke G, Polak J, Sakkinen P, Tracy R. Association between physical activity and markers of inflammation in a healthy elderly population. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153(3): 242–50. King DE, Carek P, Mainous AG III, Pearson WS Inflammatory markers and exercise: differences related to exercise type. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(4):575–81. K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 [126] Mattusch F, Dufaux B, Heine O, Mertens I, Rost R. Reduction of the plasma concentration of Creactive protein following nine months of endurance training. Int J Sports Med 2000;21(1):21–4. [127] Adamopoulos S, Parissis J, Kroupis C, Georgiadis M, Karatzas D, Karavolias G, et al. Physical training reduces peripheral markers of inflammation in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2001;22(9):791–7. [128] Gielen S, Adams V, Mobius-Winkler S, Linke A, Erbs S, Yu J, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of exercise training in the skeletal muscle of patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42(5):861–8. [129] Tisi PV, Hulse M, Chulakadabba A, Gosling P, Shearman CP. Exercise training for intermittent claudication: does it adversely affect biochemical markers of the exercise-induced inflammatory response? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;14(5): 344–50. [130] Esposito K, Pontillo A, Di Palo C, Giugliano G, Masella M, Marfella R, et al. Effect of weight loss and lifestyle changes on vascular inflammatory markers in obese women: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289(14):1799–804. [131] Garvey WT, Kwon S, Zheng D, Shaughnessy S, Wallace P, Hutto A, et al. Effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein subclass particle size and concentration determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Diabetes 2003;52(2): 453–62. [132] Halle M, Berg A, Garwers U, Baumstark MW, Knisel W, Grathwohl D, et al. Influence of 4 weeks’ intervention by exercise and diet on low-density lipoprotein subfractions in obese men with type 2 diabetes. Metabolism 1999;48(5):641–4. [133] Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD, Knetzger KJ, Wharton MB, MCCartney JS, et al. Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med 2002;347(19):1483–92. [134] Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2001;286(10):1195–200. [135] Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003;289(1):76–9. [136] Stern MP, Haffner SM. Body fat distribution and hyperinsulinemia as risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Arteriosclerosis 1986;6: 123–30. [137] Despres JP. Abdominal obesity as important component of insulin-resistance syndrome. Nutrition 1993;9(5):452–9. [138] Rodriguez-Moran M, Guerrero-Romero F. Hyperinsulinemia and abdominal obesity are more prevalent in non- diabetic subjects with family history of type 2 diabetes. Arch Med Res 2000;31(4):399–403. 585 [139] Haffner SM. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome: the San Antonio Heart Study. Br J Nutr 2000; 83(Suppl 1):S67–70. [140] Arad Y, Newstein D, Cadet F, Roth M, Guerci AD. Association of multiple risk factors and insulin resistance with increased prevalence of asymptomatic coronary artery disease by an electronbeam computed tomographic study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21(12):2051–8. [141] Arcaro G, Zamboni M, Rossi L, Turcato E, Covi G, Armellini F, et al. Body fat distribution predicts the degree of endothelial dysfunction in uncomplicated obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23(9):936–42. [142] Schwartz RS, Cain KC, Shuman WP, Larson V, Stratton JR, Beard JC, et al. Effect of intensive endurance training on lipoprotein profiles in young and older men. Metabolism 1992;41(6):649–54. [143] Schwartz RS, Shuman WP, Larson V, Cain KC, Fellingham GW, Beard JC, et al. The effect of intensive endurance exercise training on body fat distribution in young and older men. Metabolism 1991;40(5):545–51. [144] Ross R, Dagnone D, Jones PJ, Smith H, Paddags A, Hudson R, et al. Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2000;133(2):92–103. [145] Irwin ML, Yasui Y, Ulrich CM, Bowen D, Rudolph RE, Schwartz RS, et al. Effect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;289(3):323–30. [146] Despres JP, Pouliot MC, Moorjani S, Nadeau A, Tremblay A, Lupien PJ, et al. Loss of abdominal fat and metabolic response to exercise training in obese women. Am J Physiol 1991;261(2 Pt 1): E159–67. [147] Pescatello LS, Franklin BA, Fagard R, Farquhar WB, Kelley GA, Ray CA. American College of Sports Medicine. Position Stand. Exercise and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36: 533–53. [148] Ruderman N, Devlin JT, Schneider S, Kriska A. Handbook of exercise in diabetes. 2nd edition. Alexandria (VA): American Diabetes Association; 2002. [149] American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2002. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(Suppl 1):S1–147. [150] Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106(25): 3143–421. [151] Inoguchi T, Yamashita T, Umeda F, Mihara H, Nakagaki O, Takada K, et al. High incidence of 586 [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] K.J. Stewart / Cardiol Clin 22 (2004) 569–586 silent myocardial ischemia in elderly patients with non insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1998;47(1):37–44. Janand-Delenne B, Savin B, Habib G, Bory M, Vague P, Lassmann-Vague V. Silent myocardial ischemia in patients with diabetes: who to screen. Diabetes Care 1999;22(9):1396–400. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th edition. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2000. Chipkin SR, Klugh SA, Chasan-Taber L. Exercise and diabetes. Cardiol Clin 2001;19(3):489–505. Gordon NF. The exercise prescription. In: Ruderman N, Devlin JT, Schneider S, Kriska A, eds. Handbook of Exercise in Diabetes. 2 ed. Alexandria, VA: American Diabetes Association; 2002: 269–88. Fletcher GF, Balady G, Blair SN, Blumenthal J, Caspersen C, Chaitman B, et al. Statement on exercise: benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans. A statement for health professionals by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation 1996;94(4):857–62. Blair SN, Kohl HW, Gordon NF, Paffenbarger RS Jr. How much physical activity is good for health? Annu Rev Public Health 1992;13:99–126. Stewart KJ, Effron MB, Valenti SA, Kelemen MH. Effects of diltiazem or propranolol during exercise training of hypertensives men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990;22(2):171–7. Pollock ML, Franklin BA, Balady GJ, Chaitman BL, Fleg JL, Fletcher B, et al. AHA Science Advisory. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: benefits, rationale, safety, and prescription: An advisory from the Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association; Position paper endorsed by the American College of Sports Medicine. Circulation 2000;101(7):828–33. American Diabetes Association Position Statement. Diabetes Mellitus and Exercise. Diabetes Care 2002;25(Supplement 1):564–8. [161] Willey KA, Singh MA. Battling insulin resistance in elderly obese people with type 2 diabetes: bring on the heavy weights. Diabetes Care 2003;26(5): 1580–8. [162] Feigenbaum MS, Pollock ML. Prescription of resistance training for health and disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31(1):38–45. [163] Brubaker PH, Kaminsky LA, Whaley MH. Coronary artery disease: essentials of prevention and rehabilitation. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2002. [164] Hornsby WG, Chetlin RD. Resistance training. In: Ruderman N, Devlin JT, Schneider S, Kriska A, editors. Handbook of exercise in diabetes. 2nd edition. Alexandria (VA): American Diabetes Association; 2002. p. 311–9. [165] The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health-HLBI, National High Blood Pressure Education Program 1997. Report #98–4080. [166] Badenhop DT, Dunn CB, Eldridge S, English SM, Hickey AP, Mayo CH, et al. Monitoring and management of cardiac rehabilitation patients with type 2 diabetes. Clinical Exercise Physiology 2001;3(2):71–7. [167] Berger M. Adjustment of insulin and oral agent therapy. In: Ruderman N, Devlin JT, Schneider S, Kriska A, editors. Handbook of exercise in diabetes. 2nd edition. Alexandria (VA): American Diabetes Association; 2002. p. 365–76. [168] Stewart KJ, Hiatt WR, Regensteiner JG, Hirsch AT. Exercise training for claudication. N Engl J Med 2002;347(24):1941–51. [169] Aiello LP, Wong J, Cavallerano JD, Bursell S, Aiello LM. Retinopathy. In: Ruderman N, Devlin JT, Schneider S, Kriska A, editors. Handbook of exercise in diabetes. 2nd edition. Alexandria (VA): American Diabetes Association; 2002. p. 401–13. [170] Estacio RO, Regensteiner JG, Wolfel EE, Jeffers B, Dickenson M, Schrier RW. The association between diabetic complications and exercise capacity in NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care 1998;21(2): 291–5.