* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download DETERMINATION OF ACTIVATION ENERGY IN HOT
Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup
Glass transition wikipedia , lookup
Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup
Fatigue (material) wikipedia , lookup
Fracture mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Energy harvesting wikipedia , lookup
Thermodynamic temperature wikipedia , lookup
Nanogenerator wikipedia , lookup
Spinodal decomposition wikipedia , lookup
Hooke's law wikipedia , lookup
Viscoplasticity wikipedia , lookup
Energy applications of nanotechnology wikipedia , lookup
Strengthening mechanisms of materials wikipedia , lookup
Paleostress inversion wikipedia , lookup
Shape-memory alloy wikipedia , lookup
Viscoelasticity wikipedia , lookup
18. - 20. 5. 2011, Brno, Czech Republic, EU DETERMINATION OF ACTIVATION ENERGY IN HOT FORMING OF ALLOY Fe-40Al TYPE Ivo SCHINDLER a, Václav ŠUMŠAL a, Michal CAGALA a, Hana KULVEITOVÁ a, Marcin KNAPIŃSKI b a VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, 17. listopadu 15, 708 33 Ostrava, Czech Republic, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Materials Processing Technology and Applied Physics, Al. Armii Krajowej 19, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland, [email protected] Abstract Low density and comparatively favourite price of the Fe – 40 at. % Al type intermetallic compounds predestine them for various technical applications, but their promising potential is used only in a limited way as yet, mainly due to their high brittleness. Conventional techniques of processing of the coarse-grained structure by hot forming, which are accompanied by the repeated recrystallization and progressive grain refining, are feasible only with great difficulty in the case of this material. With regard to attraction of the given type material, the plastometric research at temperatures 800 °C to 1200 °C was carried out as a basic -1 -1 one, namely using the compression tests on plastometer Gleeble at strain rates 0.05 s to 30 s . Cylindrical specimens with diameter 10 mm and height 15 mm were manufactured with great difficulty from laboratory castings of the cross section ca 20 x 33 mm, gained by means of the vacuum induction furnace. The very coarse-grained material contained 25.1 wt. % Al and 0.013 % wt. C. From the obtained stress-strain curves the values of peak stress were determined, which were used for determination of the values of activation energy in hot forming according to the classical equation of the hyperbolic sine type. Enumeration of its coefficients led at the same time to a chance to predict maximum deformation resistance characteristics of the investigated alloy in dependence on temperature and strain rate. Keywords: iron aluminides; hot compression; stress-strain curves; activation energy; deformation resistance 1. INTRODUCTION Iron aluminides have been considered as potential candidates for high temperature structural applications primarily due to their attractive physical, oxidative, and mechanical properties [1]. Intermetallic compounds of Fe – 40 at. % Al type are formed by B2 FeAl phase. Their low density, comparatively favourite price and other beneficial service properties predestine them for various technical applications, but their promising potential is used only in a limited way as yet, mainly due to their considerable brittleness. Conventional techniques of processing of the coarse-grained structure by hot forming (rolling and/or extrusion), which are accompanied by the repeated static recrystallization and progressive grain refining, are feasible only with great difficulty in the case of this material. Issues connected with the low formability can be improved to a certain degree by selected ternary additions, as for instance Mn or B. Another type of solution represents then the application of casting with using the method of lost wax moulding or powder metallurgy – see e.g. [2]. Using special protective capsules [3], laboratory castings made of the brittle intermetallic alloys were successfully hot rolled [4]. The rolling was performed from thickness 20 to 13 mm with 6 or 4 passes, using afterheating of the intermediate rolled product in the furnace heated to temperature 1200 °C after eve ry even pass [5]. Even the symptoms of superplasticity of the given alloys in conditions of the slow tensile deformation [6] or compression deformation [7] are known. The main target of the work was to obtain stress-strain curves for this type of the material in a wide range of strain, strain rate and temperature and determine the activation energy during hot forming from the peak 18. - 20. 5. 2011, Brno, Czech Republic, EU stress values. The plastometric tests should enable to determine the basic characteristics of formability in relation to thermomechanical conditions of forming. 2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Cylindrical specimens with diameter 10 mm and height 15 mm were manufactured with great difficulty from laboratory castings of the cross section ca 20 (thickness) x 33 (width) mm, gained by means of the vacuum induction furnace. It was necessary to use i.a. water jet cutting and fine grinding because machinability of the coarse-grained material, containing 25.1 % Al, 0.014 % C and 0.16 % Mn (all in wt. %, remainder Fe) was reduced very much. Figure 1 documents the very heterogeneous and coarse-grained microstructure of the laboratory casting over its height (or thickness 20 mm). Similarly the cylindrical specimens were oriented, where the areas with the as small as possible occurrence of the internal cavities were chosen, which complicated the preparation of specimens and their following hot forming. Uniaxial hot compression (flow stress) tests of the cylindrical specimens were performed on the dynamic testing machine Gleeble 3800, after the unified preheating to temperature 1200 °C. The forming temperatures were chosen 800 °C, 900 °C, 1000 °C, 1 100 °C or 1200 °C, the strain rate values were 0. 05 -1 -1 -1 -1 s , 0.4 s , 4 s or 30 s . The formability was favourably influenced by heated tools – a) influence of strain rate at constant temperature 1100°C b) influence of temperature at constant strain rate 0.05 s Fig. 1 Microstructure of the casting -1 Fig. 2 Selected examples of determined stress-strain curves 18. - 20. 5. 2011, Brno, Czech Republic, EU swages. Most of the tests could be finished after reaching the true (logarithmic) height reduction ca 0.5. The result of experiments was stress-strain curves, recalculated from the recorded values of the forming force and compression of the specimen – see e.g. the comparative graphs in Fig. 2. The situation was complicated from time to time by premature fracture of the material. 3. MATHEMATICAL PROCESSING OF RESULTS -1 Apparent activation energy for hot deformation Q [J·mol ] is a constant dependent on the chemical composition and microstructure of the hot formed material whose deformation behaviour is largely influenced by this quantity. Knowledge of its value is very useful, e.g. for description of dynamic recrystallization kinetics or stress-strain curves at continuous deformation. For finding out the Q-value, it is obvious to use a solution of modified equation [8] −Q e& = C ⋅ exp ⋅ [sinh(α ⋅ σmax )] n R ⋅ T (1) -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 where e& [s ] is strain rate; C [s ], α [MPa ] and are another material constants; R = 8.314 J·mol ·K ; T [K] is deformation temperature; σmax [MPa] is deformation resistance associated with the maximum (peak) stress. This relationship was originally developed for mathematical description of strain rate corresponding to the steady-state stress σss [MPa] and therefore it is basically possible to use both the σmax- and σss-values for computation of activation energy. Nevertheless, the peak stress is applied much more often because the σss -values are hardly accessible at wide range of strain rates and temperatures. The traditional way of assessing the constants in Eq. 1 was described e.g. in [9]. It can be solved by a graphic method using multiple linear regression analysis. The computing program ENERGY 4.0 in language Turbo Pascal 5.0 was developed [10] which has made more sophisticated work with the input data set (T – e& – σmax) possible. Brainless automated advance of the calculation often leads to strange results, mostly due to definite scatter of experimental data. The procedure described above is largely sensitive to the position of every point in regression coordinates, especially if the number of data points is low (which is practically always the case due to limited resources for experiments) [11]. Hence the capability to plot selected data and individually evaluate it is so important. The possibility of separation of some points from further calculation seems to be absolutely basic. Software ENERGY 4.0 makes it possible in the first stage the evaluation and selection of experimental data and a rough estimate of the particular material constants in Eq. 1, Fig. 3 Example of work with programme ENERGY 4.0 – hardcopy of monitor afterwards in the during final regression (before more precise automatic recalculation) second stage they are 18. - 20. 5. 2011, Brno, Czech Republic, EU specified more precisely by means of the computer-aided application of the least squares method during the non-linear regression, the result of which is among others the model σmax = f(T, e& ). One of the job stages within the framework of programme ENERGY 4.0 is demonstrated in Fig. 3. The final regression analysis resulted in gaining the following constants in Eq. 1 for the investigated iron aluminide of type Fe – 40 at. % -1 -1 10 -1 Al: activation energy Q = 235 kJ·mol , n = 2.68, α = 0.0033 MPa , C = 2.17·10 s . 4. DISCUSSION The obtained values of the activation energy and further material constants enable - based on the modified Eq. 1 – to predict the maximum deformation resistance of the investigated material in dependence on the -1 temperature-compensated strain rate, defined by Zener-Hollomon parameter Z [s ] [12]: Q Z = e& ⋅ exp R⋅T σ max = (2) 1 Z ⋅ arg sinh n α C (3) The graph in Fig. 4 compares the experimentally measured and the according to Eq. 1 calculated values σmax. Although the accuracy of plastometric tests was adversely affected by the structural heterogeneity of specimens and sometimes also by their premature fracture, the resulting mathematical description of the dependence σmax = f(T,γ) may be regarded as very successful. So, it was not necessary to modify parameter Z, as it did e.g. the authors of works [13,14]. In technical literature sufficient pieces of information may be found concerning apparent activation energy for hot working, or flow activation energy during superplastic deformation of alloys on the basis of iron aluminides. The problem with the comparability of results consists in very different testing conditions of particular authors – e.g. during torsion or tensile tests, when the different order strain rate values and ranges of the applied temperatures, very different initial grain size etc. may occur. For the materials of FeAl type (containing ca 40 at. % Al) e.g. the following values of Fig. 4 Comparison of measured and according to Eq. 3 calculated activation energy are mentioned values σmax (all data about the chemical composition in at. %): -1 Gas atomized FeAl (Fe-39.6Al-0.19Mo-0.05Zr) [15]: Q = 465 kJ·mol -1 Water atomized FeAl (Fe-39.4Al-0.18Mo-0.05Zr-0.86O2) [15]: Q = 430 kJ·mol -1 Large-grained Fe-36.5Al [16]: Q = 370 kJ·mol -1 Large-grained Fe-36.5Al-1Ti [16]: Q = 290 kJ·mol -1 Large-grained Fe-36.5Al-2Ti [16]: Q = 260 kJ·mol -1 Fe-40Al-5Cr-0.2Mo-0.2Zr-0.02B [17]: Q = 343 kJ·mol 18. - 20. 5. 2011, Brno, Czech Republic, EU -1 It is obvious that our value Q = 235 kJ·mol is in comparison with the above mentioned activation energy values very low. This discrepancy may also be influenced by a different methodology of determination of the variable Q. While we start from the complex hyperbolic sine relation of type given in Eq. 1, other authors use the equation −Q e& = A ⋅ σ n ⋅ exp R⋅T (4) where stress σ [MPa] is on the pertinent stress-strain curve localized differently. It is evident that Eq. 4 corresponds to a simplified shape of Eq. 1 and is suitable for the description of deformation behaviour only at the low stress values [9,13]. Of course, its advantage consists in the easy conversion into a shape appropriate for the linear regression analysis. -1 From the literature analysis it is obvious that the derived value Q = 235 kJ·mol deformation behaviour of some alloys of Fe3Al type: corresponds rather to -1 Fe-27.5Al [15]: Q = 260 kJ·mol -1 Fe-28Al [18]: Q = 263 kJ·mol -1 Fe-28Al-2Ti [15]: Q = 191 kJ·mol -1 Fe-28.7Al-2.3Cr [15]: Q = 340 kJ·mol -1 Fe-29.6Al-2.7Mn [15]: Q = 350 kJ·mol Considering the complicating effect of internal cavities in the investigated cast material on its plastic properties, we succeeded in defining the basic trends of influence of deformation conditions on formability of the material in conditions of the compression test. The occurrence of cracks at surface of the compressed specimen subject to free spread was evaluated. The formability lowered with decreasing temperature and increasing strain rate, which corresponds with data about the superplastic behaviour of the iron aluminides at very low forming speeds [6,18]. 5. SUMMARY In an indirect way the key role of cooling of surface layers in formability of the Fe – 40 at. % Al type intermetallic compounds was confirmed. If we manage to avoid the heat removal from these areas into the tool during the plastic working, the hot technological formability of these and similarly hardly workable materials is increasing – see e.g. the application of protective capsules in rolling, indicia of superplasticity during the tensile test or the effect of heated swages during the compression tests, applied in this work. The plastic properties of the studied alloy are positively influenced by a higher temperature and lower strain rate. Based on plastometric tests, a relatively low value of the apparent activation energy for hot deformation of -1 the investigated alloy Q = 235 kJ·mol was determined. Thanks to this value the equation precisely describing the relation between the maximum deformation resistance and Zener-Hollomon parameter at -2 1 -1 temperatures 800 to 1200 °C and strain rates of the order 10 to 10 s could be derived. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was carried out in the framework of the project P107/10/0438 (Czech Science Foundation), with utilization of the procedures developed at solving of Project No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0040 (within the frame of the operation programme "Research and Development for Innovations" financed by the Structural Funds and from the state budget of the Czech Republic) and Research Plan MSM6198910015 (Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic). 18. - 20. 5. 2011, Brno, Czech Republic, EU REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] DEEVI, S.C., SIKKA, V.K. Nickel and iron aluminides: An overwiew on properties, processing, and applications. Intermetallics, 1996, Vol. 4, No.5, pp. 357-375. DEEVI, S.C. Powder processing of FeAl sheets by roll compaction. Intermetallics, 2000, Vol. 8, No. 5-6, pp. 679685. SCHINDLER, I., ŠULA, M. Application for the patent PV 2008-301 (Czech Patent and Trademark Office, 2008). SCHINDLER, I. et al. Forming of cast Fe – 45 at.% Al alloy with high content of carbon. Intermetallics, 2010, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 745-747. SCHINDLER, I. et al. Hot Rolling of Brittle Fe-40at.%Al Type Alloy. Hutnické listy, 2010, roč. 63, č. 6, s. 26-31. LIN, D.L., LI, D.Q., LIU, Y. Superplasticity in large-grained FeAl – based intermetallic alloys. Intermetallics, 1998, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 243-256. LYSZKOWSKI, R., BYSTRZYCKI, J., PLOCINSKI, T. Processing maps for hot working of FeAl-based alloys. Intermetallics, 2010, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 1344-1347. SELLARS, C.M., McTEGARD, W.J.McG. Hot Workability. International Metallurgical Review: 1972, Vol. 17, Review 158, pp. 1-24. SELLARS, C.M., McTEGARD, W.J.McG. On the mechanism of hot deformation. Acta Metallurgica, 1966, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp.1136-1138. SCHINDLER, I. et al. A new software calculating the activation energy. In Forming 2005. Ostrava : VŠB–TUO, 2005, pp. 145-150. SCHINDLER, I., BOŘUTA, J. Utilization Potentialities of the Torsion Plastometer. Katowice : Silesian Technical University, 1998. 106 p. ZENER, C., HOLLOMON, J.H. Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. Journal of Applied Physics, 1944, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 22-32. LIN, Y.C., CHEN, M.S., ZHONG, J. Constitutive modeling for elevated temperature flow behavior of 42CrMo steel. Computational Materials Science, 2008, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 470–477. MANDAL, S. et al. Constitutive equations to predict high temperature flow stress in a Ti-modified austenitic stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2009, Vol. 500, No. 1-2, pp. 114-121. PRASAD, Y.V.R.K. et al. Optimalizition of hot workability and hot deformation mechanisms in FeAl and Fe3Al based alloys. In 3rd International Symposium on Structural Intermetallics. Warrendale : The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2001, pp. 233-239. LI, DQ., LIN, D.L., LIN, T.L. Activation energy of FeAl alloys dutiny superplastic deformation. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 1997, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 16-19. KUPKA, M. Technological plasticity studies of the FeAl intermetallic phase-based alloy. Intermetallics, 2004, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 295-302. LIN, D. et al. Superplasticity in large-grained Fe3Al alloys. Intermetallics, 1996, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 489-496.