Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
News Editorial Communicating risk – and the risk of communicating Sue Bowler, Editor Whatever the eventual outcome of the judicial process following the L’Aquila earthquake, the conviction of six scientists and one government official for manslaughter has rung alarm bells in all areas of science where researchers are expected to forecast events and assess risk. And, of course, these are the areas where much of the science within the remit of the RAS have the greatest economic impact. It is not just earthquakes, but forecasts of natural hazards, environmental change and space weather are increasingly in demand from government and industry. The last thing we need is for researchers to steer away from working in these commercially and socially significant fields, for fear of arrest. Many of the events that researchers are seeking to understand and, where possible, to forecast, are low probability, high risk events. The effectiveness of forecasts can be assessed only by making the forecasts in real time, and comparing the outcomes with the real world. Many forecasts will be wrong, to a large or small degree, but avoiding making them avoids the opportunity to learn how to improve them. One of the lessons that has come out of scientific riskassessment of natural hazards so far is that rare events happen. In 1981 Mt St Helens erupted in a powerful lateral blast caused by a landslip that took observers by surprise, not because it had not been forecast, but because it was given a probability of just 5% by volcanologists. A big part of the problem is the gap between careful scientific assessment of risk, and the public dissemination of that assessment. Better communication about the problems involved from everyone in this process – scientists, the public, local and national officials – would be a good first step. [email protected] 6.4 L’Aquila verdict poses risk for science The conviction of six Italian seismologists for manslaughter following the L’Aquila earthquake has been met with concern by scientific bodies around the world. The scientists may appeal, but the case raises issues around the assessment and communication of risk that may seriously affect seismologists, volcanologists and those working in space weather, among others. In a statement, the Royal Astronomical Society deplores the sentences and offers support to all those involved: “The victims of the L’Aquila earthquake, and their families, deserve a thorough investigation of all measures taken before the earthquake. Such an investigation would also be of immense value to other communities exposed to seismic hazard in Italy. Instead, the draconian sentences – which have been handed down to scientists and civil defence personnel alike – trivialize the multifaceted problem of identifying, communicating and mitigating seismic hazard, and make future progress more difficult.” The risk is that scientists will choose not to be involved in areas where real-time evaluation of a changing situation, and prediction of future events, is expected by civil authorities and industrial clients, for example. The European Geosciences Union stressed the potential danger of this approach: “If scientists stop actively engaging with the public to demonstrate the importance of their work, if they refuse to work in hazardevaluation panels, or if they are afraid of offering scientific advice to the best of their ability, the prime foundations of science – sharing and openly HARPS spots nearby exo-Earth http://bit.ly/VBTY8q Citizen science finds planet precision achieved using this method. “Alpha Centauri Bb is the first planet with a mass similar to Earth ever found around a star like the Sun. Its orbit is very close to its star and it must be much too hot for life as we know it,” said Stéphane Udry (Geneva Observatory), a co-author of the paper and member of the team, “but it may well be just one planet in a system of several. Our other HARPS results, and new findings from Kepler, both show clearly that the majority of low-mass planets are found in such systems.” The discovery was published in Nature by Xavier Dumusque of Geneva Observatory and co-authors and brought congratulations from NASA, among many others. ● M artin Beech reviews the Alpha Centauri system on pages 6.10–6.16 of this issue. The citizen science project Planet Hunters has discovered the first planet found in a four-star system. An international team of astronomers together with volunteers using the Planethunters.org website identified and confirmed the discovery of this circumbinary planet (PH1) in a four-star system. The volunteers, Kian Jek of San Francisco and Robert Gagliano of Cottonwood, Arizona, spotted faint dips in starlight as the planet made transits. Meg Schwamb, a Yale postdoctoral researcher, led the team of professional astronomers that confirmed the discovery and characterized the planet, using data from the Keck telescopes on Mauna Kea, Hawaii. PH1 is a gas giant with a radius about 6.2 times that of Earth (a bit bigger than Neptune) and orbits outside a pair of eclipsing stars that are 1.5 and 0.41 times the mass of the Sun. It revolves around its host stars roughly every 138 days. Beyond the planet’s orbit at about 1000 au is a second pair of stars orbiting the planetary system. “Circumbinary planets are the extremes of planet formation,” said Schwamb at the annual meeting of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society in Reno, Nevada. “The discovery of these systems is forcing us to go back to the drawing board to understand how such planets can assemble and evolve in these dynamically challenging environments.” The paper has been submitted to The Astrophysical Journal. http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1241 http://www.planethunters.org An artist’s impression of the newly discovered planet Alpha Centauri Bb. (ESO/L Calçada/N Risinger [skysurvey.org]) European astronomers have found a planet with about the mass of the Earth orbiting a star in the Alpha Centauri system. The planet, the lightest exoplanet discovered around a star like the Sun, was detected using the HARPS instrument on the 3.6 m telescope at ESO’s La Silla Observatory in Chile. Alpha Centauri is a triple star system only 4.3 light-years away from the solar system, comprising two stars similar to the Sun orbiting close to each other, Alpha Centauri A and B, and a more distant and faint red component known as Proxima Centauri. The European team used the HARPS instrument to detect slight variations in movement of the star Alpha Centauri B arising from the gravitational tug of the planet – the star moves back and forth by no more than 51 cm s –1, about the speed of a baby crawling. This is the highest discussing research and increasing knowledge – are no longer met.” The situation in the case of the L’Aquila case is complex and involves both scientific understanding of earthquake risk and the way in which all those involved communicated that risk to the people who live and work in the affected region. The RAS argues for “a sustained programme of education at all levels of society – the general public, local authorities, and policy makers – communicating the nature of the hazard, the risk to which communities are exposed, and the measures that can be taken to reduce that risk. Without such education, advice at a moment of crisis may well be misunderstood and, in the aftermath of a disaster, that same advice may be turned against those who gave it.” A&G • December 2012 • Vol. 53