Download Topic 6 Introduction

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Ursa Major wikipedia , lookup

CoRoT wikipedia , lookup

Star of Bethlehem wikipedia , lookup

Corona Australis wikipedia , lookup

Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup

Pulsar wikipedia , lookup

Lyra wikipedia , lookup

First observation of gravitational waves wikipedia , lookup

Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

SN 1054 wikipedia , lookup

Cosmic distance ladder wikipedia , lookup

Gamma-ray burst wikipedia , lookup

Cygnus X-1 wikipedia , lookup

Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Lambda-CDM model wikipedia , lookup

Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Dyson sphere wikipedia , lookup

Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Future of an expanding universe wikipedia , lookup

Ursa Minor wikipedia , lookup

History of supernova observation wikipedia , lookup

Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Star formation wikipedia , lookup

Stellar evolution wikipedia , lookup

Supernova wikipedia , lookup

P-nuclei wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Topic 6
Supernovae
Introduction
•  We talk of supernovae (SN) in this course on
Nuclear Astrophysics because SN are responsible
for dispersing pre-processed elements into the
interstellar medium for further processing during
(new) star formation
•  SN are the death throes of massive stars
–  Typical kinetic energy release: 1044 J
–  Typical total energy release: 1046 J (100x that of the Sun
for 10 billion years)
–  Temporarily outshine an entire galaxy (magnitude -19 to
-20)
–  Optical light is only ~ 1% of total output (majority as
neutrinos)
General SN Properties
•  In general there are 2 basic processes that can occur at the
end of a star’s life cycle which can result in a supernova
–  Runaway thermonuclear explosion
–  Core collapse
•  However, they are classified according to the appearance
(or not) of spectral lines, in particular H, at maximum light
–  Type I - no H lines in spectra, sub-divisions according to light curve,
spectra, progenitor mass, site, etc.
•  Type Ia - have no H lines but He and strong Si II are seen
•  Type Ib - lacks H and Si II lines
•  Type Ic - no H, Si II and He lines
–  Type II - evidence of H emission lines, sub-classification on light
curves
•  Type II P - flat plateau part of light curve
•  Type II L - linear light curve
Type Ia Supernovae
•  Observations
–  H deficient
–  Seen in all types of galaxies (in particular, associated with
populations of older stars between the arms) - implies stars have
long lives before exploding
–  Presence of Si II seen at maximum light (2nd strongest distiguishing
feature)
–  Accounts for ~ 75% of all type I SN
–  Light curve is identical and reproducible
•  Initial sharp rise to peak at absolute magnitude -19.5
•  Long, almost linear (exponential?) fall-off after ~ 50 days
•  Use as standard candles by cosmologists
–  At peak brightness BB spectrum at ~ 15000K plus Si II, Ca II, S II,
Mg II and O I absorption lines - later on Fe II
–  Expansion velocities 10,000 - 13,000 km/s at maximum
–  No remnant is left, just an expanding cloud of gas
Type Ia Light Curve
Type Ia Supernovae
•  Model (1)
–  White Dwarf (WD) in a quiescent binary system
–  Roughly equal masses of C and O supported by electron
pressure
–  This is the evolution endpoint of 1 to 8 solar mass stars
–  Outer H-rich envelope lost, CO dwarf is the star’s core
–  Accretes matter from binary companion
–  Chandrasekhar mass limit is exceeded, density and
temperature increase, thermonuclear burning of Carbon
is triggered
–  Electron pressure doesn’t react to additional heat - star
doesn’t expand. Heat accelerates burning of C then O to
cause “runaway thermonuclear reaction”
Type Ia Supernovae
•  Model (2)
–  Accretion of new material releases gravitational
energy at the surface of the star
–  Released energy is radiated as UV
–  More accretion compressed previously accreted
matter, releases grav. energy in the interior
–  This energy is transported to the surface
(radiative cooling) and also heats interior
(compressional heating)
–  Interior temperature is defined by the relative
rates of these 2 heating/cooling processes
Type Ia supernovae
•  Model (3)
–  One of 2 possibilities for the final explosion
•  Supersonic detonation triggers shock - burning - shock
•  Subsonic deflagration wave
Carbon burning propagates outwards but not explosively. Behind
this wave material undergoes explosive burning of Si, Ne, C and
O.
–  Material incinerates to form 56Ni.
–  In both cases process is rapid, whole star is disrupted,
no remnant remains
–  All of this depends on rate of accretion - if it is low the
WD can “flash” causing nova
–  Late-time light curve is thought to be dominated by
56Ni ! 56Co ! 56Fe
Type Ia SN
Type Ib Supernovae
•  Observations
–  Like Type Ia no H at maximum light
–  Also no Si II
–  Strong He lines (weak/no He: SN Ic)
–  Optical maximum ~ 1.5 mag dimmer than SN Ia
–  Only observed in spiral galaxies (esp. near
active star-forming regions) suggests a link to
moderate mass stars
–  Lower expansion velocities than type Ia
–  Late-time spectrum dominated by O I, Ca II, Na,
Mg I emission lines
Type Ib/Ic Supernovae
•  (Possible) models
–  Hydrogen (and possibly He) “denuded” cores of
massive stars
–  Hydrogen lost either via
•  Stellar winds (radiation pressure linked to high
luminosity)
•  Transfer to a binary companion
–  May be exploding Wolf-Rayet and/or Helium (Ic)
stars
Type II Supernovae
•  Observations
–  Presence of H (stars have retained their H envelopes)
–  Found only in spiral galaxies, mainly in arms
–  At maximum light peak magnitude can differ by 2.0
–  Wide range of expansion velocities (2000 - 20000 km/s)
–  At maximum light almost continuous spectrum, some
(weak) H, He absorption
–  Late-time features include Ca II, Fe II, Ti II, Sc II
absoprtion lines
–  Lot of variation - probably due to different progenitor
mass
SN I vs SN II light curves
SN II-L vs SN II-P light curves
Type II Supernovae
•  Model (1)
–  Core collapse of a massive star at the end of
thermonuclear fusion cycle
–  How massive? Typically 8 to 50 solar masses (text
books differ on these figures)
–  We saw in Topic 4 that such a massive star evolves to a
layered body where different fuels are burned (“onion”
analogy)
–  Recall also from Topic 4 that as higher mass fuels are
burned the relative time burning is less and less
–  Fusion continues until an iron core is established
–  At this point no further burning can take place
Type II Supernovae
•  Model (2)
–  As usual, as the fuel in exhausted gravitationaal collapse
occurs causing heating. Usually this ignites the next fuel.
–  However in this case the mean photon energy becomes
such that photodissociation of Iron can take place. This
is the so-called Iron-Helium phase transition
56Fe ! 13 4He + 4n -124.4 MeV
–  Note that this process is endothermic
–  This energy is provided at the expense of the
gravitational field
–  This accelerates the core collapse
Type II Supernovae
•  Model (3)
–  As the core further collapses the transition to a
neutron star commences
–  Density reaches 1017 kg.m-3 and electrons are
forced into protons causing neutrons to form
–  The inner core, about 1.4 solar masses then
rapidly cools via neutrino radiation
–  In fact neutrinos carry off ~99% of the energy of
the collapse (few x 1046J)
–  Collapse is rapid, neutron star forms, outer core
of star is not collapsing (infalling) as fast and so
hits the neutron star and “bounces off”
Type II Supernovae
•  Model (4)
–  Following this “bounce” the subsequent shock heats up
and disrupts the remainder of the star causing lots of
processed material to be dispersed in the interstellar
medium
–  Neutron star is left behind
–  Rebounding outer core shock loses energy dissipatively
(neutrinos, photodissociation)
–  Models show the shock should quickly lose its kinetic
energy
–  So why do we see the SN explosion??
–  It may be that neutrinos themselves play a part in the
creation of the SN explosion
Type II Supernovae
•  Model (5)
–  What is true is that the inner heavy element
burning layers of the star must be expelled at
high velocity with some shock mechanism or
else material would continue to fall back into the
neutron star and a black hole would form
–  As the shock passes through new fusion takes
place and much 56Ni is produced
–  Again, as in the discussion for SN type Ia the
subsequent radioactive decays to 56Co (half-life
6.1 days) and then 56Fe (half-life 77.2 days)
drives the late-light curves of these SN
Type II Supernovae
•  Model (6)
–  Shock continues through rest of star, arriving at
the surface after 2h to 1d (depending on
progenitor mass)
–  SN is now “visible”
–  Early light is in UV, as surface expands and
cools light looks like a BB with T=6000K
–  As the shock envelope continues to travel out
and cool Hydrogen recombination kicks in
•  Removes opacity
•  Luminosity starts to decline dramatically
–  Late light from radioactive decay of 56Co
SN 1987A
•  SN 1987A was a supernova in
the Large Magellanic Cloud and
was visible from Earth with the
naked eye despite being 51kpc
away
•  2-3 hours before visible light 3
different neutrino observatories
detected a total of 24 neutrinos significantly above observed
background levels"
•  This was the first time neutrinos emitted from a supernova had
been observed directly
•  The observations were consistent with theoretical supernova
models in which 99% of the energy of the collapse is radiated away
in neutrinos. The observations are also consistent with the models'
estimates of a total neutrino count of 1058 with a total energy of 1046
Joules.
SN 1987A - a mystery
•  SN 1987A appears to be a core-collapse supernova, which should
result in a neutron star. Since the supernova first became visible,
astronomers have been searching for the collapsed core but have not
detected it. HST images show no evidence of a neutron star. Two
possibilities for the 'missing' neutron star are being considered:"
–  the neutron star is enshrouded in dense dust clouds so that it cannot be
seen"
–  large amounts of material fell back on the neutron star, so that it further
collapsed into a black hole."
Solved Supernova Problem
•  A 10 solar mass star explodes leaving
behind a neutron star of radius 10 km and
density 6.7 x 1017 kg.m-3. A theorist
proposes that 10% of the mass difference is
released as high energy (10 TeV) photons.
Assuming the photons are released
isotropically and that the supernovae takes
place on the other side of the galaxy at 50
kpc from Earth estimate the flux of high
energy photons incident on the Earth after
the explosion. (1 TeV = 1012eV)"
Supernova rates
e.g. arXiv:1006.4613v2 (Lick survey):
2.84 ± 0.60 total number SN/100 years
2.30 ± 0.48 core collapse SN/100 years
… in Milky Way
Solved Problem solution