Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. • 6(3) • 2014 • 308-329 DOI: 10.2478/s13533-012-0182-z Central European Journal of Geosciences Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Research Article Nino Popkhadze1∗ , Robert Moritz2 , Vladimer Gugushvili1 1 Al. Janelidze institute of Geology of I. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, 0186 Tbilisi, Georgia 2 Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland Received 27 September 2013; accepted 30 May 2014 Abstract: This study focuses on a well-exposed section of the Artvin-Bolnisi zone located in the open pit of the Madneuli ore deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia. Detailed field and petrographic observations of the main volcano-sedimentary lithofacies of its Upper Cretaceous stratigraphic succession were carried out. Whole rock geochemistry studies support the interpretation of intense silicification of the rocks, and supports our petrographic studies of samples from the Madneuli open pit, including lobe-hyaloclastite described in detail during this study. A particular focus concerned lobe-hyaloclastite exposures in the Madneuli open pit, singled out for first time in this area of the Lesser Caucasus. Two types of hyaloclastite are recognized at the Madneuli deposit: hyaloclastite with pillow-like forms and hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages. The petrographic description shows a different nature for both: hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages represented by devitrification of volcanic glass, which is replaced by quartz and K-feldspar overgrowth of crystals in the groundmass and elongated K-feldspar porphyry phenocrysts. Perlitic cracks were identified during thin section observation. The Hyaloclastite with pillow-like forms consists of relicts of volcanic glass and large pumice clasts replaced by sericite. Key observations are presented in the case of lobe-hyaloclastite and their immediate host volcano-sedimentary environment to constrain their depositional setting. A paleoreconstruction of their environment is proposed, in which hyaloclastite record the interaction of magma emplaced in unconsolidated volcano-sedimentary rocks associated with a submarine rhyodacite dome, emplaced during several magmatic pulses. Our study shows that the predominant part of the host rock sequence of the Madneuli polymetallic deposit was deposited under submarine conditions, which is in agreement with volcanogenic massive sulfide models or transitional, shallow submarine magmatic to epithermal models that were proposed by previous studies. Keywords: Hyaloclastite • lobe-hyaloclastite • pillow-like forms • glass-like selvages • facies © Versita sp. z o.o. 1. ∗ Introduction E-mail: [email protected] The Cretaceous Artvin-Bolnisi zone of Georgia belongs to the Lesser Caucasus and was formed during northeastward subduction of the Tethys below the Eurasian margin. This study focuses on a well-exposed section of the Artvin- 308 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. Bolnisi zone, in the open pit of the Madneuli polymetallic ore deposit of the Bolnisi mining district, located about 50 km south of Tbilisi, close to the Georgian-Armenian border (Figure 1(a)). According to the majority of previous studies, the formation of the Madneuli deposit is tightly linked to the evolution of Upper Cretaceous magmatism in the Bolnisi district [2–5]. However, questions remain about the specific relationships with the local geological evolution. Indeed, both volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) [6, 7] and porphyry-epithermal deposit models have been proposed [8]. Furthermore a genetic model combining both environments and favoring a transitional volcanogenic massive sulfide-epithermal scenario with a transitional submarine to subaerial environment was also proposed [9]. The most recent investigation interpreted the Madneuli deposit as a transitional hydrothermal system with a magmatic input formed in a submarine environment [10]. In this contribution, we report detailed field and petrographic observations of the main volcanogenic sedimentary lithofacies, which comprise the Upper Cretaceous part of the stratigraphic record of the Bolnisi mining district, and we particularly focus on lobehyaloclastite exposures in the Madneuli open pit, which are singled out for first time in this area of the Lesser Caucasus [11–13]. Our main aims are to describe the emplacement, fragmentation and eruption processes that operated in the area, to constrain the volcano-sedimentary depositional environments. We particularly emphasize the key observations that need to be made in the case of lobe-hyaloclastites and their immediate host volcanosedimentary environment to constrain their submarine depositional setting. Our study underlines the careful and detailed field and petrographic studies, which still need to be carried out in future investigations in similar environments along the Lesser Caucasus, where the submarine or subaerial depositional environment of rock units is still very much debated and poorly constrained. This investigation is also an important contribution to the understanding of the geological setting and the genesis of the Madneuli polymetallic deposit, which is one of the major ore deposits of the Lesser Caucasus (Figure 1(b)). Thus, the identification and the interpretation of major lithofacial units is a powerful tool for determining the paleogeographic and the geotectonic environment of volcanic successions spatially and genetically associated with ore deposit formation. Previous descriptions and interpretations of the volcano-sedimentary complex of the Madneuli deposit and other ore prospects of the Bolnisi ore district were succinct and did not address physical volcanology and facies architecture aspects of the host rocks. The volcanic facies architecture models created for old VMS provinces such as the Cambrian Mount Read Volcanics, Tasmania, Australia [15, 16]; the Cambro-Ordovician Mount Windsor Subprovince, Queensland, Australia [17]; the Proterozoic Skellefte district, Sweden [18]; the Archean Noranda district, Quebec, Canada [19]; the Ordovician, Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, Canada [20]; and the Upper Devonian to Lower Carboniferous Neves Corvo district (Iberian Pyrite Belt) in southern Portugal and Spain [21] have proven to be important in providing the framework for ore deposit studies and exploration, and helpful in reconstructing the massive sulfide ore-forming environment and processes [21]. Our study based on physical volcanology, volcanic and volcano-sedimentary facies architecture and sedimentary basin analysis is the first detailed approach of the Georgian Madneuli deposit. In particular, this paper describes two types of rhyodacitic lobe-hyaloclastite, which are exposed in the open pit of the Madneuli deposit. They include (1) hyaloclastite with pillow-like forms and (2) hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages. Hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages refers to a breccia facies, morphologically associated with carapace breccias occurring along the upper surface of the distal part of flows. By contrast, hyaloclastite with pillowlike forms is a pumiceous hyaloclastite, which consists of pumice fragments and volcanic glass. 2. Regional Geological Setting The Madneuli ore deposit is located in the Artvin-Bolnisi zone, southern Georgia, which belongs to the Lesser Caucasus belt (Figure 1(a)). The Lesser Caucasus records a complex pre- to post-collisional history, documenting the convergence between the African/Arabian plates and the European margin during the closure of the Neotethys [8, 22, 23]. It consists of three main geological tectonic zones, which are from SW to NE: (1) the South Armenian Block of Gondwana affinity; (2) the ophiolitic Sevan-Akera suture zone; and (3) the Eurasian margin, which includes the Kapan zone, the Somkheto-Karabakh island arc, the Artvin-Bolnisi zone and the Adjara-Trialeti zone [1, 22, 23]. The Artvin-Bolnisi zone represents the active Cretaceous magmatic arc along the Lesser Caucasus and is the northeastern extremity of the Somkheto-Karabakh island arc (Figure 1(b)). The Adjara-Trialeti zone to the north of the Artvin-Bolnisi zone (AT in Figure 1(a)) represents an associated Santonian-Campanian back-arc [1]. The Artvin-Bolnisi zone is characterized by a Hercynian basement, which consists mainly of: (1) a Late Proterozoic-Early Paleozoic basement, (2) a Neoproterozoic-Cambrian granite basement complex, (3) 309 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Figure 1. (a) Location of the Madneuli deposit in the Bolnisi region [1]. Abbreviations: S - Scythian Platform; GCS - Greater Caucasus Suture; T - Transcaucasus; AT - Southern Black Sea Coast-Achara-Trialeti Unit; AB - Artvin-Bolnisi Unit; P - Pontides; BK - Bayburt-Karabakh Imbricated Unit; NALCS - North Anatolian-Lesser Caucasian Suture; AI - Anatolian-Iran Platform. (b) Geological map of the Lesser Caucasus, highlighting Mesozoic and Cenozoic intrusive rocks, ophiolites, and major ore districts [14] SAB-South Armenian Block; SASZ-Sevan Akera suture zone; SKIA-Somkheto Karabakh island arc. 310 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. a Middle-Late Carboniferous microcline granite basement complex, and (4) a Late Proterozoic-Early Paleozoic Tectonic Melange Zone [1, 22, 24]. In the Bolnisi region, two basement complexes are exposed, and are called the Khrami and Loki salient. They are overlain by Carboniferous volcanogenic sedimentary rocks, followed by Jurassic sedimentary and volcanic rocks. The Jurassic rocks consist of terrigenous, volcaniclastic and calcalkaline magmatic arc rocks, including andesite, dacite, rhyolite, basalt and volcaniclastic rocks intruded by granitoids [1]. The Bolnisi volcanic-tectonic depression consists of Cretaceous, Paleogene, Pliocene and Quaternary rocks. Within the Artvin-Bolnisi zone, the Upper Cretaceous section is dominated by volcanic rocks consisting of calcalkaline basalt, andesite, dacite and rhyolite. Their thickness reaches up to 3000-4000 m. Volcanic rocks were deposited in a shallow marine to subaerial environment [1, 22]. Three main formations are distinguished within the Albian-Upper Cretaceous volcanogenic sedimentary unit: 1) Albian-Cenomanian terrigenous-carbonate, 2) Turonian-Santonian volcanogenic and 3) CampanianMaastrichtian carbonate units. This sequence is unconformably overlain by a Maastrichtian-Paleocene turbidite sequence (Figure 2). A Lower Eocene formation consists of terrigenous clastic rocks. Middle Eocene volcanic rocks unconformably overlie older rocks and are conformably overlain by Upper Eocene shallow-marine clastic rocks. The youngest rocks in the region are Quarternary volcanic rocks and alluvial sedimentary rocks [1, 22]. Besides the major Madneuli ore deposit, numerous ore occurrences are described in the Bolnisi region, and include Sakdrisi, David-Gareji, Qvemo-Bolnisi, TsiteliSopeli, Darbazi and Beqtakari (Figure 2). All of them are hosted by Cretaceous volcanic and volcanogenic sedimentary rocks. 3. Stratigraphy of the Bolnisi ore district The Bolnisi district is a Cretaceous magmatic region, with complex, laterally and vertically variable regional stratigraphic relationships. The Upper Cretaceous rock formations are subdivided into five separate suites (Figure 3) [26, 27]. The host rock succession of the Madneuli deposit belongs to the Mashavera suite, and consists predominantly of lava, pyroclastic, volcanogenic sedimentary and other sedimentary rocks of rhyodacitic composition (Figure 3). An Upper Turonian to Lower Santonian age is currently attributed to the ore-bearing Mashavera suite [26, 27], which is underlain by the Upper Turonian Didgverdi suite and overlain by the Lower Santonian Tandzia, Gasandami and Shorsholeti suites (Figure 3). However, a more recent interpretation advocates an Upper Turonian-Coniacian stratigraphic age for the ore-hosting Mashavera suite, and an Upper Turonian to the underlying Didgverdi suite (Vashakidze, pers. comm.1998). A recent nanofossil study of the host rocks interprets the Mashavera suite as Campanian [29]. Radiolaria identification from the host rocks is presently in progress to solve the host rock age inconsistencies. Recent TIMS U-Pb dating of zircons from mafic dikes located in the southeastern part of the Madneuli open pit and crosscutting the rhyodacitic extrusion yielded ages of 8687 Ma, therefore supporting a Coniacian-Santonian age of the host rocks of the Madneuli deposit [30]. 4. Overview of the major volcanic and volcano-sedimentary lithofacies in the Madneuli open pit Stratigraphic relationships and textural characteristics of the host rocks of the Madneuli deposit are best exposed in some key areas of the open pit (Figure 4) [12]. Identification and characteristics of facial units are based on detailed studies of each existing mining level of the open pit. Our field-oriented observations throughout the entire open pit and adjacent areas enabled us to collect and interpret the different volcanic and sedimentary structures, outline their distribution and their relationship in the open pit and classify them into facies assemblages. The different units were characterized based on variations in composition and texture. Twelve lithofacies were singled out in our study for the first time at the Madneuli deposit. Descriptions and interpretations of the twelve principal facies are summarized in Table 1. Lithofacies units, described within the host-rock succession of the Madneuli deposit, are grouped in two facies assemblages: a stratigraphically lower volcano-sedimentary facies assemblage and an upper volcanic facies assemblage (Figure 5). In addition to these two facies assemblages, a granodioritic- to quartz dioritic porphyry has been encountered during drilling beneath the Madneuli deposit, at a depth of 800-900 meters below the present day surface [29]. The lower, bedded volcano-sedimentary facies assemblage has an apparent thickness in the open pit of about 200 m and predominates in the open pit (Figure 5). It hosts the different ore types, including a stockwork vein zone in the western and northern parts, and a pyrite-telluride-gold 311 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Figure 2. Geological map of the Bolnisi ore district [25]. vein corridor in the eastern part (Figure 5). Strongly silicified bedded sedimentary rocks alternate with tuff. Very fine-grained tuff, associated with vesiculated tuff [35, 36] horizons, containing bioturbations and accretionary lapilli are present on all flanks of the open pit and may serve as marker horizons (see red horizons in Figure 5). Vesiculated tuff is more indurated than the surrounding beds. Most vesicles in the tuff have a diameter of 0.5 to 3 mm and a few reach 1 cm. The upper surfaces of vesiculated tuff are characterized by ripple marks, which are interpreted as gravity flowage ripples [35]. In the upper levels of the open pit bedded sedimentary rocks of this complex consist of alternations of strongly silicified marl, sandstone, turbiditic rock, volcanogenic mudstone, and rare radiolarian-bearing horizons (see red and white stars in Figure 5). Cross-bedding, slumps, load casts, groove marks, wave and current ripples, and different bioturbations are also present in the volcano-sedimentary bedded rocks, which are dominated by volcanogenic turbidites with well exposed Bouma Ta, Tb, and Tc divisions and these sedimentary rocks are volcanogenic in origin, but transported and deposited by sedimentary processes [37]. The pumice-rich volcaniclastic horizons of variable thickness can be singled out in this volcano-sedimentary facies assemblage. In the lower part of the volcanosedimentary facies assemblage, the volcaniclastic facies is strongly silicified, altered and mineralized. Hydrothermal alteration affects pervasively the pumice-rich rock and can totally obliterate its original texture. In the upper part of the open pit the volcaniclastic facies are less silicified, altered and mineralized, with the exception of local abundant pyrite mineralization. The size of pumice range between 1 mm and 3 cm and more in some places. Most of them have an elongated form and are flattened and planar-stratified. The stratigraphically upper volcanic facies assemblage is mainly of rhyodacitic composition and consists of the 312 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. Figure 3. Lithostratigraphic column of the Bolnisi ore district (N. Popkhadze). Data from [27, 28]. following facial units (from bottom to top): rhyodacitic pyroclastic flow with flow foliation, columnar jointed ignimbrite, rhyodacitic extrusion, non-stratified rhyolitic to dacitic breccia facies, ignimbrite and lithic to pumicerich facies (Figure 5). The northern part of the Madneuli open pit is dominated by a 55 m thick rhyodacitic lavaflow with flow foliation and columnar jointed ignimbrite. Flow-foliated rhyodacitic lava is strongly silicified. The flow displays a 3 mm- to 5 cm- thick layering, defined by an alternation of pale siliceous bands and bands including darker more phyllosilicate-rich material. The layering is mainly planar, with some local flow folding and finely bulbous cauliflower-like margins. A few cognate lava clasts occur within the siliceous layers, revealing that lithic inclusions are not always diagnostic of a pyroclastic origin [38]. They consist of phenocrysts and rounded aggregates of anhedral quartz, with a locally preserved perlitic texture. The shapes of the 8 to 10 m-thick columnar jointed ignimbrite are rectangular. It contains crystals and rock fragments. The matrix is glassy and brown-colored. There is a typical spherulitic texture of the volcanic glass with perlitic fractures, which is evidence of high-temperature devitrification of initially glassy, welded ignimbrite [39]. A massive, rhyodacitic extrusion is present in the south-eastern part of the open pit and is characterized by a granular, false clastic and pyroclastic texture in some outcrops [38]. Locally this rhyodacite displays a pumiceous texture. Some pumice clasts are replaced by chlorite and sericite. An interlayer of fine-grained tuff was described within this body [29]. A 45 m thick rhyodacitic ignimbrite with a welding texture overlies the rhyodacitic lava flow with flow 313 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Figure 4. Panorama of the Madneuli open pit: (a) view from the eastern part towards the west, (b) view toward the south from the top of the hill in the northern edge of the open pit. foliation in the northern upper part of the open pit, which contains no mineralization, but contains scarce silica-rich xenoliths [4]. The volcano-sedimentary complex contains the lobe-hyaloclastite, described in more detail below, with distal parts consisting of Hyaloclastite with glasslike selvages and pillow-like forms (see Hg and Hp in Figure 5). 5. Lobe-hyaloclastite flow in the Madneuli deposit In the Madneuli open pit, it is possible to observe fragments of lobe-hyaloclastite flow: massive (coherent) lava, flow-banded border zone of lava, carapace breccia, individual lobes and two types of hyaloclastite: hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages and one with pillowlike forms [40–43]. Detailed descriptions of each existing outcrop in the open pit allow us to interpret them and understand the emplacement mechanism and facies of rhyodacite dome recognized in the open pit. The lobe-hyaloclastite flow creates a dome structure in the open pit. In some parts, it is possible to recognize a gradational transition from the coherent part of the flow to quenched rocks forming the hyaloclastite. The coherent rhyodacite facies is volumetrically dominant in the open pit within the dome structure (85 vol%), about 1500 m wide and up to 100 m high [44–48]. It consists of massive, non-vesicular rhyodacite, characterised by welldeveloped columnar joints (Figure 6(a)). The columns have pentagonal and, in some cases rectangular outlines in cross section, the width of which is between 3 and 6 m. The coherent rhyodacite facies contains abundant 4 to 7 cm-sized green and subsidiary grey macrocrystalline enclaves (Figure 6(b)), and occasional 10 to 30 cmsized fragments of fine-grained tuff. The periphery of the pumiceous hyaloclastiteis characteristic by flow banding (Figure 6(c)). The structure of the pumiceous hyaloclastite differs from the one of hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages, as they belong to different lobes, attributed to different pulses of lava emplaced at the periphery of the dome.Fragments of poorly sorted and crudely layered carapace breccia are present in the eastern and uppermost part of the open pit (Figure 6(d)). It consists of lobe fragments, massive and flow banded, set in a hyaloclastite matrix [33]. 5.1. Hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages The best-exposed section of the hyaloclastite rock formation is in the eastern part of the Madneuli open pit (see Hg and Hp in Figure 5). A ring structure of isolated 314 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. Figure 5. Facies distribution map in the Madneuli open pit (this study), with ore zone locations from [10]. lobe within the massive facies [49] with internal columnar joints is present in the south-eastern part of the open pit, which lucks like the glass-like selvages of its distal part, and reveals a similar structure. The diameter of this lobe is 13-15 m (Figure 7(a)). The term selvage means a distinct border of a mass of igneous rock. It is usually finegrained or glassy due to rapid cooling. Glass-like selvage is one of the main characteristic structures of hyaloclastite. It was formed by cooling, quenching and fracturing of its external parts of rhyadacite lava during emplacement in 315 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Table 1. Summary of the main volcano-sedimentary facies of the Madneuli deposit. Lithofacies Characteristics Interpretation Volcano-sedimentary facies assemblage Altered pelitic sedimentary rock, sandstone and siltstone with Silicified bedded volcano-sedimentary slide-slump unit; sedimentary rock with turbiditic nature [4]; contains horizons with Radiolaria facies Flow transformation into turbidity currents; sandstone is the product of channelized mass flow deposition; subaqueous setting Fine-grained accretionary lapilli tuff and tuff with bioturbation Shallow water sedimentation; in part Massive or normally graded; recrystallized volcanic glass in the groundmass; lapilli of various sizes, oval-shaped, filled with quartz; water-settled volcanic ash lapilli-rim type, with a core of coarse-grained ash, surrounded by a rim of finer-grained ash Water-settled pyroclastic fall deposit Inner flow stratification within a single layer shows fine-grained lamination, normal grading, thick units with clasts and reverse-graded at the top and fine-grained perlitic in the upper part Resedimentation of shallow submarine pyroclastic flow; down-slope transport by high concentration turbidity current [31] Pumicerichvolcaniclastic (pyroclastic) facies Predominantly matrix-supported pumice concentration zone; low abundance of lithic clasts and crystals; stratified zone; fine-grained lithic clasts; sub-angular lapilli, locally vesicular Deposition from pulsatory pyroclastic current [32] Peperite In-situ mingling at the margins of intrusion or lava with unconsolidated radiolarian-bearing sediment within a submarine volcanic succession Contact: wetsediment-hot lava, subaqueous environment. Fluidal character Hyaloclastite Carapace rhyodacitic breccia flow; Hyaloclastite, with pillow like shapes and glass-like selvages [5]; Groundmass with a perlitic structure; fractures defined by chlorite, and glass replaced by quartz, feldspar, sericite and epidote Lobe hyaloclastitefacies, reflects a continuous evolution of textures and structures, formed during extrusion in response to rapid chilling and quench fragmentation of lava by water or by wet hyaloclastite formed from previous lobes [33] Volcanic facies assemblage Rhyodacite lava-flow Shards of felsic rocks along flow foliation. Porphyry structure with Coherent facies of volcanic dome with flow foliation plagioclase, K-feldspar and quartz phenocrysts; perlitic (cryptodome) or volcanic sill groundmass, amygdales filled with quartz; local strong silicification Columnar-jointed ignimbrite Columnar jointed ignimbrite; typical perlitic groundmass, with a spherulitic texture, and oval-shaped quartz crystals. Depositional setting below a storm-wave environment. High-temperature devitrification of volcanic glass Rhyodacitic extrusion Massive; evenly porphyritic groundmass micropoikilitic; locally pumiceous Coherent facies of lava or volcanic dome Non stratified rhyolitic-dacitic breccia facies Massive, poorly sorted, clast- to matrix supported; slabby rock fragments, irregular, blocky and oval-shaped; local alteration, including silicification Autoclastic breccia from the margins of subaqueous lava or cryptodome Ignimbrite Welded ignimbrite containing lapilli and crystal fragment or lapilli Deposition from pyroclastic flow and matrix. Crystal fragments are plagioclase, orthoclase, and quartz; glass shards with cuspate and platy shapes. Some local strong silicification Lithic- to pumice-rich non-welded ignimbrite Lithic, pumice and crystal fragments of different sizes; local mudstone fragments with no sedimentary strata; no gradation. water. Cooling is typically more rapid than at its margins in contrasts to the internal parts of massive lava. During cooling and devitrification, the glassy part of the lava developed a fine network permeability that enabled them Product of pyroclastic surges, which preceded or accompanied the main pyroclastic density current [34] to be pervasively altered and acted as preferential fluid migration pathways [38]. Water has a great capacity to penetrate into fractures. The penetration of water was accompanied by hydrothermal alteration, which can 316 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. Figure 6. Representative examples of hyaloclastite outcrops at Madneuli open pit: a - columnar joints in the coherent part of the lobe hyaloclastite, b - The example of microcrystalline enclaves in the coherent rhyodacite facies, c - flow banding of the periphery part of Hyaloclastite with pillow-like forms, d - Carapace breccias in the uppermost part of the open pit. locally result in different colors of the rocks [38]. In some places this alteration is developed around the fracture zone and results in a rim texture (Figure 7(b)), which is defined by a glass-like selvage and in other places it is more pervasive and develops patch-like forms. Subaqueous lobe-haloclastite flows are identical to subglacial dacite and rhyolite flows observed in Iceland and described by [50]. The subglacial, Quaternary dacite flow Blahnukur of the Torfejokull central volcanic complex in South central Iseland is a prime example. Like lobe-Hyaloclastite flow at Noranda [51], rhyolitic lobes at Blahnukur are characterized by a massive, typically columnar-jointed glassy interior, flow-banded border zone, and in situ brecciated glassy selvage, which are similar to glass-like selvages described in the Madneuli open pit. There are other analogue examples from submarine settings, in submarine lava flow-dome complex, such as in Ponza in Italy [48], in the Early Devonian Ural volcanic rocks [52], pumiceous rhyolitic peperite, which is associated with a rhyolitic sill which intruded a wet, unconsolidated, submarine pumice breccia in the Cambrian Mount Read volcanic rocks in Australia [53] and an example of silicic intrusion-dominated volcanic center at Highway-Reward, Australia [17]. Homogeneously devitrified cores remain relatively impervious to hydrothermal alteration. During the formation of hyaloclastite in the Madneuli open pit, the quenched selvage was broken and spalled. It is characterized by intense silicification, devitrification and chloritization. At the outcrop scale, the hyaloclastite gives the apparent impression of anautobreccia with pale rims surrounding grey to green rock fragments 317 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Figure 7. Representative examples of hyaloclastite outcrops at Madneuli (see Hg and Hp locations in Figure 5): (a) - Margins of a lobe hyaloclastite flow with internal columnar joints, (b) - Carapace breccias, (c) - Pillow-like shapes in hyaloclastite, (d) -Transitional zone from massive to pillow-structured parts in pillow-like hyaloclastite. (Figure 6(b)). This false clastic, breccia structure was produced by the combined effects of devitrification, perlitic fracturing and pervasive hydrothermal alteration [38]. The pale colored rims within the hyaloclastite are 0.5 to 3 cm-thick, and in thin section they have a similar texture to the gray to green rock fragments, with the only difference being that the pale-colored rims contain less phenocrysts than the grey to green cores (Figure 8(a)). This type of hyaloclastite rock is characterized by a perlitic texture, as recognized with a hand lens and in thin section. In some exceptional cases, macro-perlitic textures can be recognized at the outcrop scale within the Madneuli open pit (Figure 8(b)). This hyaloclastite type contains round and oval-shaped amygdales filled with quartz-chlorite or a fine-grained carbonate-clay association (Figure 8(c)-(d)). According to our petrographic descriptions, hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages contains less than 30% of phenocrysts, including elongated sanidine crystals (Figure 9(a)). The groundmass consists of devitrified volcanic glass with a mosaic texture, radial-shaped crystals of K-feldspar and spherules of quartz. Plagioclase microlites are surrounded by spherulites (Figure 9(b)). Phenocrysts include quartz, plagioclase and K-feldspar of different sizes. In some places, they are associated with glomeroporphyric textures. Sericite alteration affects K-feldspar and plagioclase crystals. Spherulites with fine-grained quartz and feldspar are products of high-temperature devitrification of silicic volcanic glass. Subsequent recrystallisation of mosaic quartz - feldspar destroyed or modified such original devitrification textures [39]. The groundmass contains perlitic cracks. Perlitic cracks developed in response to hydration of the glass. 318 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. Figure 8. Representative examples of hyaloclastite outcrops at Madneuli open pit: (a) - pale-colored rim of glass-like selvages in the outcrop, (b) - classical macro-perlitic texture in the outcrop, (c), (d) - ovel-shaled amygdales in the hyaloclastite rocks. Hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages has a classic perlitic texture, in which the cracks are distinctly arcuate and concentrically arranged around spherical cores. Hydration occurred after emplacement and during the later cooling history of the glass, or after complete cooling to surface temperature [39]. In thin sections, perlitic cracks, instead of crosscutting elongated K-feldspar phenocrysts crystals, follow their edges (Figure 9(c)-(d)). 5.2. Hyaloclastite with pillow-like forms Hyaloclastite with pillow-like forms is exposed on three bench levels in the eastern part of the open pit (see Hp in Figure 5), where typical small-elongated pillowlike shapes occur (Figure 7(c)). Along the same section, there is also a gradational transition from massive lava to a pillow-like shaped part (Figure 7(d)). The size of pillow-like forms is about 15-18 cm in length and 6-8 cm wide. The pillow-like forms has a local distribution and associated with the bedded volcano sedimentary rocks. The coherent lava is quite thick and compositionally similar to hyaloclastite facies. They do not have rounded pillow forms, they are flat and have elongated sigmoidal shapes, most likelydue to the pressure of the overlying rocks, or the water pressure. Intense hydrothermal alteration developed along these fractures. Such kind of hyaloclastiteis present elsewhere in the same Mashavera suite, in the vicinity of the open pit of the Sakdrisi deposit (Figure 2), which reveals their regional development associated to different lobes. It is the external part of isolated lobes (pumiceous lava lobe), which were also described by [33]. The similar rhyolitic lobes and associated pumiceous hyaloclastiteis interpreted by [51] as a product of Subplinian to Plinian eruptions. 319 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Figure 9. Petrographic observations of glassy-like selvage hyaloclastite. (a) - Elongated phenocryst of K-feldspar. (b) - Associated pale-colored and gray-brown alteration (crossed nicols). Formation of perlitic cracks, the same field of view in crossed polarized light and plane polarized light. (c) - Perlitic cracks in glassy groundmass, note that they do not crosscut K-feldspar phenocrysts (crossed nicols). (d) Perlitic cracks (plane polarized light). Coherent rhyodacitic lava is pumiceous and consists of glass shards also. It resembles other pumice-rich facies that are common in submarine volcanic successions. One example of coherent pumiceous rhyolite and pymiceous hyaloclastite is found in the Cambrian Mount Read Volcanic rocks in Australia [53]. The matrix surrounding the pillows is a blue-colored altered rock of the same rhyodacitic composition as the pillow. The local thickness of outcrops varies between 5 and 8 m. In thin section, pillow-like hyaloclastite has a rhyodacitic composition with a porphyritic texture, whereas the groundmass consists of relicts of volcanic glass replaced by finely disseminated quartz and K-feldspar. Large pumice clasts are also present. Locally, the groundmass has a fluidal nature. In some places, the matrix displays a vitriclastic texture accentuated by axiolitic devitrification of glassy components. The center of Figure 10(a) shows a relict pumice clast with a destroyed internal vesicular microstructure. The brown rims of matrix shards are affected by axiolitic devitrification [39]. Pumice clastsare characterized by chilled margins and curviplanar surfaces. Shards of volcanic glass have preserved their platy and cuspate shapes (Figure 10(b)). Crystals of biotite are present and rare muscovite as well. The margins of Kfeldspars are partly resorbed. In some places, crystal relicts are totally replaced by chlorite. Sericite alteration overprints plagioclase crystals (Figure 10(c)). A pumice clast is replaced by sericite (Figure 10(d)). 320 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. Figure 10. 6. Petrographic observations of pumice hyaloclastite: (a) - Axiolitic devitrification of glass. (b) - Remnants of platy and cuspate shaped volcanic glass and pumice. (c) - Sericite microcrystals replacing a plagioclase crystal (crossed polarized light). (d) - Pumice clast replaced by sericite. Whole-rock chemical aspects Chemical analyses in Table 2 reveal a silica-rich nature of the hyaloclastite rocks (high SiO2 contents of 69.94 to 77.77 wt%), which would classify them as rhyolite. However, based on immobile trace and minor elements, the Zr/TiO2 vs. Nb/Y diagram (Figure 11) reveals a predominantly rhyodacitic/dacitic composition of the Upper Cretaceous volcanic rocks from the Madneuli open pit (see red diamonds in Figure 8) with no rhyolitic samples, including the four hyaloclastite samples analyzed in this study (see green dots in Figure 8). Therefore, we attribute the very high silica content to intense silicification during alteration of the hyaloclastite rocks at the Madneuli ore deposit. 7. Alteration Based on our field and petrographic studies, the Upper Cretaceous rhyodacitic hyaloclastite from the Madneuli open pit was affected by both low temperature and high temperature alteration. The low temperature alteration includes: (1) hydration of volcanic glass resulting in partial replacement by clay minerals and chlorite, and (2) open pore space (vesicles, amygdales) filling by chlorite, and finely disseminated clay minerals and calcite. Evidence for high temperature alteration is devitrification of volcanic glass in glassy-like selvage type hyaloclastite, in which the mosaic texture of volcanic glass is outlined by quartz and K-feldspar replacing spherulites, surrounded by a matrix of plagioclase microlites. Hyaloclastite locally contains columnar joints, which proves that the 321 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Figure 11. Zr/TiO2 vs. Nb/Y diagram after [54] showing the compositional range of mafic and felsic volcanic rocks of the Bolnisi region (red diamonds: samples from the Madneuli open pit, and blue triangles: samples out of the open pit) in contrast to the hyaloclastite samples of this study (green dots). glass granules were cemented at high temperature, since columnar joints can only form in a coherent material as concluded in other studies on Miocene and Archean rhyolite hyaloclastite [55]. More detailed and recent investigations about hydrothermal alteration mostly associated with the mineralization zones in the Madneuli deposit by [10] allowed us to establish the first alteration map for the Madneuli open pit. The following alteration zones weredefined in the open pit: a silicified core, followed by a quartz-sericite-pyrite zone, a quartz-chloritesericiteand quartz-chlorite zone and weak regional chlorite-sericite. Also diagenetic/low temperature albite and chlorit [10]. Albite and chlorite are typical products of seawater interaction with volcanic rocks at low temperature [56, 57]. 8. Paleoenvironmental interpretation and emplacement mechanism of lobe-Hyaloclastite at Madneuli Figure 12(a) displays the relationship of the glassylike selvage lobe-hyaloclastite flow of our study with the coherent volcanic and adjacent rock units. The hyaloclastite is located at the periphery of a rhyodacite lava lobe, therefore representing a gradual transition from the massive, coherent part of the volcanic rock towards its periphery at the contact with the volcano-sedimentary rocks. The hyaloclastite rock likely consisted at the time of emplacement of unconsolidated bedded volcano- 322 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. Table 2. Whole rock analyses of hyaloclastite rocks from the Madneuli open pit (concentrations in wt%): 1-2 hyaloclastite with pillow like forms, 3-4 hyaloclastite with glassy like selvage. 1 2 3 4 SiO2 74.74 77.77 75.50 69.94 TiO2 0.22 0.35 0.30 0.58 Al2 O3 11.29 10.31 12.58 13.09 Fe2 O3 4.11 2.72 3.45 6.24 MnO 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.17 MgO 2.91 1.83 1.14 2.49 CaO 0.21 0.19 0.40 0.33 Na2 O 1.33 3.06 3.87 3.23 K2 O 1.43 0.58 0.90 1.08 P 2 O5 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.15 LOI 2.95 2.85 1.85 2.56 Total 99.33 99.79 100.08 99.86 sedimentary units, with alternations of ash tuff, pumice tuff and sedimentary rocks. Figure 12(b) shows that the central part of the pumiceous rhyodacitic lava lobe is surrounded by hyaloclastite formed in situ. The lobe is dissected in its external part and locally has a wavy-shaped outline (similar to the ones described by [39]), marked by the presence of small, pillow-like (or sigmoidal) forms at its periphery, and forms a gradual transition from the massive, coherent magmatic rock into the pillow-like shaped part. The lava lobe is associated with a rhyodacitic lava flow with wellexposed fluidal zonality in its external part. Peperite is located at its contact with the volcano-sedimentary rock unit [58–60]. Identification of peperite during this study was of critical importance in clarifying the facies architecture and stratigraphy providing constraints on the age relationship and timing of intrusive episodes and sedimentation processes, as discussed previously by [53] in the case of pumiceous peperite. Subaqueous felsic lavas can be divided into lobehyaloclastite flows, blocky subaqueous lava, domes, cryptodomes, and regionally extensive felsic lava [33]. Figure 13 is an idealized cross-section through a rhyolitic lobe-hyaloclastite flow, which illustrates the flow morphology and structures typical for proximal and distal facies in such rock units. The lobe hyaloclastite flow is inflated by successive pulses of new magma, which feeds its large lobes. They generally follow a very irregular path to the flow front, where they form smaller lobes and locally they have small-sized pillow-like shapes [33]. The Madneuli lobe-hyaloclastite flow is massive in general, though locally ribbed, flow laminated and columnar jointed. The chaotic character of the carapace breccia, their local distribution at the flow top, the absence of bedding and grading and lack of broken crystals suggest an origin dominantly due to autobrecciation [33]. 9. Model for the emplacement of the lobe-hyaloclastite in the Madneuli deposit The hyaloclastite described in the Madneuli open pit is associated with a submarine dome-like structure of felsic rhyodacite magmas and they were emplaced during several eruptive pulses [61–63]. It was accompanied by emplacement of isolated lobes. During the earliest pulses, the upper part of the lava was directly extruded in the volcano-sedimentary bedded unconsolidated rocks. The lower part of these rocks is the product of phreatomagmatic explosion. The latter one is strongly silicified, altered and ore-bearing. The upper part consists mostly of turbiditic rocks and bedded volcano-sedimentary rocks. In addition, numerous folds and fractures are present, some of them being associated with uplift during the formation of the dome structure. The newly rising magma could intrude along these faults or fracture systems and invade previously emplaced but still watersaturated glass-like selvage hyaloclastite. The formation of pumiceous hyaloclastite is related to second pulses of magmas. There are no constrains on the exact water depth during formation of the hyaloclastite. The pumiceous rhyodacitic hyaloclastite implies that volatile exsolution was not inhibited by pressure [55], which indicates a shallow water depth. The products of phreatomagmatic eruption, represented by vesiculated fine-grained tuff associated with accretionary lapilli horizons and very fine-grained tuff, suggest that the associated eruption was distal, at a distance of several km. Like in this study, accretionary lapilli can also form in a submarine environment. According to [64] accretionary lapilli can be found in subaqueous and redeposited deposits. There are many examples, such as in the Devonian Lenneporphyr of Germany [65, 66], in the Haimaraka Formation of Guyana [67], in the Tokiwa Formation of Japan [68] and in reworked deposits intercalated with Paleogene volcanic rocks on the Voring Plateau in the North Sea [69]. Furthermore, accretionary lapilli were describedin the deposits of the Ries impact crater in southern Germany [70]. Deposits of hydromagmatic eruption and hyaloclastite rocks are not contemporaneous. 323 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Figure 12. Schematic paleoreconstruction of the relationships of a lobe hyaloclastite flow with adjacent rock types and schematic logs showing the textural facies characteristics. (a) Hyaloclastite with glassy like selvages and adjacent volcano-sedimentary rock. (b) Contact of pillow-like hyaloclastite with volcano-sedimentary bedded rocks. Not to scale. 324 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. Figure 13. Schematic sketch of the lobe hyaloclastite flow of this study (modified from [33]). Hp-Hyaloclastite with pillow-like forms; HgHyaloclastite with glassy-like selvages. Not to scale. The deposition of the lower part of the volcanosedimentary facies predate the formation of the upper part of this bedded sequence, which in turn predates formation of hyaloclastites and lobes, but it was still unconsolidated. 10. Conclusions Two types of rhyodacitic lobes of lobe hyaloclastite flows are described for the first time in the Madneuli deposit of the Bolnisi mining district, Georgia: hyaloclastite with glass-like selvages and hyaloclastite with pillowlike forms, which represent the external part of individual lobes. The lobe structure with columnar jointing of the internal part, described in the eastern part of the open pit is devoid of hyaloclastite, which indicates that the lobe was emplaced within the interior of the flow or dome during endogeneous growth [33]. This internal lobe represents individual pulses of magma. The absence of different resedimented rock fragments, the gradational contact with coherent lava, their laterally discontinuous character, and the absence of bedding support their in situ hyaloclastitic nature. Spherulites in the hyaloclastite are strong evidence for high temperature devitrification of volcanic glass, which was replaced by quartz and K-feldspar in the groundmass. Classical perlitic fractures follow K-feldspar phenocrysts. This indicates that devitrification of volcanic glass occurred after crystallization of phenocrysts and perlitic cracks formed at the end. Columnar joints, which occur inside the lobe flow in the Madneuli open pit, also support a high temperature of formation. The presence of pumiceous hyaloclastite in the subaqueous lobe hyaloclastite flow is a reliable evidence for shallow water depositional environment (<200 m deep). The lack of pumiceous hyaloclastite in many subaqueous lobe-hyaloclastite flows may simply reflect their emplacement within deeper water [33]. Both types of hyaloclastite, which differ texturally, are lobe hyaloclastite. The formation processes took place in one lobe body, which was inflated by successive pulses of new magma. The lobe hyaloclastite described in this paper resembles hyaloclastite from other well known deposits [49, 50, 55], which are common in submarine felsic successions and are one of the important characteristic facies for rocks hosting volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits related to subaqueous felsic lavas/domes [33, 57, 71–73]. The association with a volcano-sedimentary complex, in which bedding textures are consistent with deposition from turbidity currents, along with the presence of slumps, cross-bedding, load casts, groove marks, wave and current ripples, different bioturbations and radiolariabearing horizons, support a below wave-base submarine depositional environment of the sedimentary rocks associated with hyaloclastite at the Madneuli deposit. Turbiditic volcano-sedimentrary rocks and hyaloclastite are present in the same stratigraphic section in the open pit, but were not coexisting during their formation. The pumice-rich volcaniclastic rocks and also the finegrained tuff with accretionary lapilli within the bedded sedimentary and volcano-sedimentary complex in the open pit are attributed to ashfall deposits of phreatomagmatic origin. Acknowledgements The research was supported by the Georgian National Science Grant 204 and Swiss National Science 325 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Foundation through the research grant SNF 200020113510 and SCOPES Joint Research Projects IB7320111046 and IZ73Z0-128324. The authors would like to thank the other participants of the project: Tamara Beridze, Stefano Gialli, Sophio Khutsishvili, Onise Enukidze and Ramaz Minigineishvili, and the staff of the "Madneuli Mine" and Malkhaz Natsvlishvili for assistance, sharing geological information, and arranging access to the mine. Thanks to Jorge Relvas (Portugal) and Fernando Tornos (Spain) for helpful discussions about facial units in the Madneuli deposit. The research would not have been possible without the support provided by SGA, SEG and IAVCEI organizations for attending many international conferences where the work was presented. [8] [9] [10] References [11] [1] Yilmaz A., Adamia Sh., Chabukiani A., Chkhotua T., Erdogan K., Tuzcu S., Karabiyikoglu M., Structural correlation of the southern Transcaucasus (Georgia) - eastern Pontides (Turkey), Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 173, 2000, 171-182 [2] Bachaldin V.,Tvalchrelidze G., Some regulations of formation and distribution of ore deposits in volcanogenic rocks (Southern Georgia). Proceedings of the Institution of Higher Education, Geological Prospecting, 1, 1963, 61-72 (in Russian) [3] Malinovsky E., Sokolov A., Lezhepiokov L., Structural-geological conditions and stages of formation of Madneuli copper-barite polymetallic deposit (Lesser Caucasus), Geology of Ore Deposits 4, 1987, 44-57 [4] Gugushvili V., Omiadze G., Ignimbrite volcanism and ore mineralization (Bolnisi Ore District, the Lesser Caucasus), Geology of Ore Deposits, 2, 1988, 105109 (in Russian) [5] Kekelia S., Ambokadze A., Ratman I., Volcanogenic deposits of base metals of paleoisland arc structures and method of their prediction, Metsniereba, Tbilisi, 1993, 0-96 [6] Moon C., Gugushvili V., Kekelia M., Kekelia S., Migineishvili R., Otkhmezuri Z., Ozgur N., Comparison of mineral deposits between Georgian and Turkish sectors of the Tethyanmetallogenic belt. In: Piestrzynski et al (eds), Mineral deposits at the Beginning of the 21st Century. 6th Biennial SGA Meeting Krakow, Poland, 26-29 August, 309-312, 2001 [7] Kekelia S., Kekelia M., Otkhmezuri Z., Ozgur N., Moon C., Ore-forming systems in volcanogenicsedimentary sequences by the example of base metal [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] deposits of the Caucasus and East PonticMetallotect. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration, 129, 2004, 1-16 Gugushvili V., Kutelia Z., Porphyry gold-copper system of the Bolnisi mining district and analysis of two types of gold mineralization. Proceedings of the International Workshop: gold and base metal deposits of the Mediterranean and the south Caucasus-challenges and opportunities, Tbilisi, 1314 Migineishvili R., Hybrid nature of the Madneuli CuAu deposit, Georgia. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, proceedings of the 2005 Field Workshop, 127-132, 2012 Gialli S., The controversial polymetallicMadneuli deposit, Bolnisi district, Georgia: hydrothermal alteration and ore mineralogy. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Geneva, 2013, 1-143 Popkhadze N., Moritz R., Gialli S., Beridze T., Gugushvili V., Khutsishvili S., Major volcanosedimentary facies types of the Madneulipolymetallic deposit, Bolnisi district, Georgia: Implications for the host rock depositional environment. In: Erik Jonsson et al. (eds), Mineral deposit research for a hightech world, 12th SGA Meeting, 12-15 August 2013, Sweden, Uppsala, 2, 576-579 Popkhadze N., Beridze T., Moritz R., Gugushvili V., Khutsishvili S., Facies analysis of the volcanosedimentary host rocks of the Cretaceous Madneuli massive sulphide deposit, Bolnisi district, Georgia. Bulletin of the Georgia National Academy of Sciences, 3, 2009, 103-108 Popkhadze N., First evidence of hyaloclastites at Madneuli deposit, Bolnisi district, Georgia, Bulletin of the Georgia National Academy of Sciences, 6, 2012, 83-90 Mederer J., Moritz R., Ulianov A., Chiaradia M., Middle Jurassic to Cenozoic evolution of arc magmatsm during Neotethyssubduction and arccontinent collision in the Kapan zone, southern Armenia, Lithos, 2013, 177, 61-78 McPhie J., Allen R., Facies architecture of mineralized submarine volcanic sequences: Cambrian Mount Read Volcanics, western Tasmania, Economic Geology, 87, 1992, 587-596 McPhie J., Allen R., Submarine, silicic, syn-eruptive pyroclastic units in the Mount Read Volcanics, Western Tasmania: influences of vent setting and proximity on lithofacies characteristics. In: White J., Smellie J., Clague D., (Eds.), Explosive Subaqueous Volcanism: Geophysical Monograph Series, 140, 2003, 245-258 326 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. [17] Doyle M., McPhie J., Facies architecture of a silicic intrusion-dominated volcanic centre at Highway-Reward, Queensland, Australia, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 99, 2000, 7996 [18] Allen R., Weihed P., Svenson S., Setting of Zn-Cu-AuAg massive sulfide deposits in the evolution and facies architecture of a 1.9 Ga marine volcanic arc, Skellefte District, Sweden, Economic Geology, 91, 1997, 10221053 [19] Gibson H., Galley A., Volcanogenic massive sulphidedeposits of the Archean, Norandadistrict, Quebec. In: Goodfellow W., [Ed.], Mineral deposits of Canada: A synthesis of major deposits, types district metallogeny, the evalution of geological provinces and exploration methods: Special Publication 5, Mineral Deposits Division, Geological Association of Canada, 533-552 [20] Rogers N., van Staal C., McNicoll V., Theriault R., Volcanology and tectonic setting of the northern Bathurst Mining Camp. Part 1. Extension and rifting of the Popelogan arc.In :Goodfellow W., McCutcheon S., Peter J., (Eds.), Massive Sulphide Deposits in the Bathurst Mining Camp, New brunswick, and Northern Maine, Economic Geology, 11, 2003, 157179 [21] Rosa C., McPhie J., Relvas J., Type of volcanoes hosting the massive sulfide deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 194, 2010, 107-12 [22] Adamia Sh., Zakariadze G., Ckhotua T., Sadradze N., Tsereteli N., Chabukiani A., Gventsadze A., Geology of the Caucasus, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 20, 2011, 489-544 [23] Sosson M., Rolland Y., Muller C., Danelian T., Menkonyan R., Kekelia S., Adamia Sh., Babazadech V., Kangarli T., Avagyan A., Galoyan G., Mosar J., Subduction, obduction and collision in the Lesser Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia), new insights, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 340, 2010, 329-352 [24] Zakariadze G., Yildirim D., Adamia Sh., Oberhansli R., Karpenko S., Bazulev B., Solov’eva N., Geochemistry and geochronology of the Neoproterozoic PanAfrican Transcaucasian Massif (Republic of Georgia) and implications island arc evolution of the late Precambrian Arabian-Nubian Shield, Gondwana Research, 11, 2007, 92-108 [25] Vashakidze S., Gugushvili V., Geological map of Bolnisi district (1:50 000). Caucasian Institute of Mineral Resources, Tbilisi, Georgia, 2006 [26] Gambashidze R., Nadareishvili G., Structure and [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] stages of development of the Upper Cretaceous volcanogenic-sedimentary formation of SE Georgia. In G. A. Tvalchrelidze (ED) volcanism and formation of useful minerals in mobile regions of the Earth "Metsniereba", 1987, Tbilisi, 152-171 (in Russian) Apkhazava M., Late Cretaceous volcanism and volcanic structures of Bolnisi volcano-tectonic depression, Doctoral thesis, Caucasian Institute of mineral resources, 1-269, 1988 Gambashidze R., Geological development history of Georgia during the upper Cretaceous period. Metsniereba. Al. Janelidze Geological Institute of Georgian Academy of Science. Proceeding, new series 82, 1984, 1-111(in Russian) Migineishvili R., Gavtadze T., Age of the Madneuli Cu-Au deposit, Georgia: evidence from new nannoplankton data, Bulletin of the Georgia National Academy of Sciences, 4, 2010, 85-91 Moritz R., Selby D., Ovtcharova M., Mederer J., Melkonyan R., Havamkimyan S., Tayan R., Popkhadze N., GugushviliV., Ramazanov V., Diversity of geodynamic settings during Cu,Au and Mo ore formation in the Lesser Caucasus: New age constraint, 1st Europian Mineralogical Conference, 2-6 September 2012, Frankfurt, Germany, abstract volume Cas R., Wright J., Subaqueous pyroclastic flows and ignimbrites: an assessment, Bulletin of Volcanology, 53, 1991, 357-380 Pittari A., Cas R., Edgar C., Nichols H., Wolff J., Marti J., The influence of paleotopography on facies architecture and pyroclastic flow processes of a lithicrich ignimbrite in a high gradient setting: The Abrigo Ignimbrite, Tenerife, Canary Island, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 152, 2006, 273-315 Gibson H., Morton R., Hudak G., Submarine volcanic processes, deposits and environment favorable for the location of volcanic-associated massive sulfide deposits, Reviews in Economic Geology, 8, 1998, 1351 Sohn Y., Son M., Jeong J., Jeon Y., Eruption and emplacement of a laterally extensive, crystal-rich, and pumice free ignimbrite (the Cretaceous Kusandong Tuff, Korea), Sedimentary Geology, 220, 2009, 190203 Lorenz V., Vesiculated tuffs and associated features, Sedimentology, 21, 1974, 273-291 Capaccioni B., Coniglio S., Varicolored and vesiculated tuffs from La-Fossa Volcano, Vulcano Island (Aeolian Archipelago, Italy) - Evidence of syndepositional alteration processes, Bulletin of 327 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM Architecture of Upper Cretaceous Rhyodacitic Hyaloclastite at the polymetallic Madneuli deposit, Lesser Caucasus, Georgia Volcanology, 57(1), 1995, 61-70 [37] Cas R. A. F., Submarine volcanism - eruption styles, products, and relevance to understanding the hostrock successions to volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits, Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists, 87(3), 1992, 511-541 [38] Allen R., False pyroclastic textures in altered silicic lavas, with implications for volcanic-associated mineralization, Economic Geology, 85, 1988, 14241446 [39] McPhie J., Doyle M., Allen R., Volcanic textures: A guide to the interpretation of textures in volcanic rocks. Centre for Ore Deposits and Exploration Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 1993, 1-198 [40] Soriano C., Giordano G., Cas R., Riggs N., Porreca M., Facies architecture, emplacement mechanisms and eruption style of the submarine andesite El Barronal complex, Cabo de Gata, SE Spain, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 264, 2013, 210-222 [41] Soriano C., Riggs N., Giordano G., Porreca M., Conticelli S., Cyclic growth and mass wasting of submarine Los Frailes lava flow and dome complex in Cabo de Gata, SE Spain, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 231, 2012, 72-86 [42] Németh K., Pécskay Z., Martin U., Gméling K., Molnár F., Cronin S. J., Hyaloclastites, peperites and soft-sediment deformation textures of a shallow subaqueous Miocene rhyolitic dome-cryptodome complex, Pálháza, Hungary. In: K. Thomson and N. Petford (Editors), Structure and Emplacement of High-Level Magmatic Systems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. The Geological Society of London, Bath, UK, 2008, 61-83 [43] Schmincke U., Behncke B., Grasso M., Raffi S., Evolution of the northwestern Iblean Mountains, Sicily: uplift, Plicocene/Pleistocene sea-level changes, paleoenvironment, and volcanism, Geol. Rundsch., 86(3), 1997, 637-669 [44] Lexa J., Seghedi I., Németh K., Szakács A., Koneĉny V., Pécskay Z., Fülöp A., and Kovacs, M., Neogene-Quaternary volcanic forms in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region: a review, Central European Journal of Geosciences, 2(3), 2010, 207270 [45] Allen R., Stadlbauer E., and Keller J., Stratigraphy of the Kos Plateau Tuff: product of a major Quaternary explosive rhyolitic eruption in the eastern Aegean, Greece, International Journal of Earth Sciences, 88(1), 1999, 132-156 [46] Stewart L., and McPhie J., Internal structure and emplacement of an Upper Pliocene dacitecryptodome, [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] Milos Island, Greece, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 124(1-2), 2003, 129-148 Stewart L., and McPhie J., Facies architecture and Late Pliocene-Pleistocene evolution of a felsic volcanic island, Milos, Greece, Bulletin of Volcanology, 68(7-8), 2006, 703-726 Scutter R., Cas R. A. F., Moore L., and de Rita D., Facies architecture and origin of a submarine rhyolitic lava flow-dome complex, Ponza, Italy, Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth, 103(B11), 1998, 27551-27566 Gibson H., Watkinson D., Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits of the Noranda cauldron and shield volcano, Quebec: Canadian Institute Mining Metallurgy, 43, 1990, 119-132 Furnes H., Fridleifsson I., Atkins F., Subglasial volcanics. On the formation of acid hyaloclastites, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 8, 1980, 95-110 Setterfield T., Hodder R., Gibson H., Watkins J., The McDougall-Despina fault set, Noranda, Quebec: Evidence for fault-controlled volcanism and hydrothermal fluid flow, Exploration and Mining Geology, 4, 1995, 381-393 Bull F., and McPhie J., Facies architecture of the Early Devonian Ural Volcanics, New South Wales, Aust. J. Earth Sci., 2006, 53(6): 919-945 Gifkins C., McPhie J., Allen R., Pumiceous rhyolitic peperite in ancient submarine volcanic successions, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 114, 2002, 181-203 Winchester J., Floyd P., Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements, Chemical Geology, 20, 1977, 325-343 Yamagishi H., Dimroth E., A composition of Miocene and Archean rhyolite hyaloclastites: evidence for hot fluid rhyolite lava, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 23, 1985, 337-355 Large R., Gemmell, Paulick H., Huston L., The alteration box plot: A simple approach to understanding the relationship between alteration mineralogy and lithogeochemistry associated with volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits, Economic geology, 96, 2001, 957-971 Gifkins C., Herrmann W., Large R., Altered volcanic rocks: A guide to description and interpretation. Centre for Ore Depisit Research (CODES), University of Tasmania, 1-275 Skilling P., White L., and McPhie J., Peperite: a review of magma-sediment mingling, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 114(1-2), 328 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM N. Popkhadze et al. 2002, 1-17 [59] Doyle G., Clast shape and textural associations in peperite as a guide to hydromagmatic interactions: Upper Permian basaltic and basaltic andesite examples from Kiama, Australia. Aust. J. Earth Sci., 47(1), 2000, 167-177 [60] White L., McPhie J., and Skilling I., Peperite: a useful genetic term, Bulletin of Volcanology, 62, 2000, 6566 [61] DeRita D., Giordano G., Cecili A., A model for submarine rhyolite dome growth:Ponza Island (central Italy), Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 107, 2001, 221-239 [62] Lexa J., Seghedi I., Németh K., Szakács A., Koneĉny V., Pécskay Z., Fülöp A., and Kovacs M., Neogene-Quaternary volcanic forms in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region: a review, Central European Journal of Geosciences, 2(3), 2010, 207270 [63] Németh K., Pécskay Z., Martin U., Gméling K., Molnár F., and Cronin J., Hyaloclastites, peperites and soft-sediment deformation textures of a shallow subaqueous Miocene rhyoliticdomecryptodome complex, Pálháza, Hungary. In: K. Thomson and N. Petford (Editors), Structure and Emplacement of High-Level Magmatic Systems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. The Geological Society of London, Bath, UK, 2008, 61-83 [64] Schumacher R., Schmincke H., Internal structure and occurrence of accretionary lapilli - a case study at Laacher See Volcano, Bulletin of Volcanology, 53, 1991, 612-634 [65] Mugge O., Untersuchungen uber die Lenneporphyre in Westfalen und den angrenzenden Gebieten, N Jb Geol Palaont Beih, 8, 1983, 535-721 [66] Heyckendorf K., Dieunterevonischen Lenne-Vulkanite im nordstichen Rheinischen Schiefergebirge. Beitrage zur Stratigraphie, Paleogeographie, Petrographie und Geochemie. PhD-thesis Universitat Hamburg, 1985, 1-363 [67] Bateson J. H., Accretionary lapilli in a geosynclinal environment, Geol Mag, 102, 1965, 1-7 [68] Fiske RS, Matsuda T., Submarine equivalents of ash flows in the Tokiwa Formation, Japan, Am J Sci 262, 1964, 76-106 [69] Vierect L. G., Taylor P. N., Parson L. M., Morton A. C., Hertogen J., Gibson I. L., and the OPD Leg 104 Scientific Party. Origin of the Paleogene Voring Plateau volcanic sequence . In: AC Morton, LM Parson (eds) Early Tertiary volcanism and the opening of the NE Atlantic, Geol Soc London Spesial Publ, 39, 1989, 69-83 [70] Graup G., Terrestrial chondrules, glass apherules, and accretionary lapilli from the suevite, Ries Crater, Germany, Earth Planet Sci Lett, 55, 1981, 407-418 [71] Cas R., Submarine Volcanism: eruption styles, products, and relevance to understanding the host rock successions to volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits, Economic Geology, 87, 1992, 511-547 [72] Allen R., Reconstruction of the tectonic, volcanic, and sedimentary setting of strongly deformed Zn, Cu massive sulfide deposits at Benambra, Victoria, Economic geology, 87, 1992, 825-854 [73] Rosa C., McPhie J., Relvas J., Type of volcanoes hosting the massive sulfide deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 194, 2010, 107-126 329 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/18/17 8:22 AM