Download Determination of calcium sulfate hydrates in cement

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Economizer wikipedia , lookup

Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup

Thermal radiation wikipedia , lookup

R-value (insulation) wikipedia , lookup

Thermal conduction wikipedia , lookup

Thermal copper pillar bump wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Thermal Analysis & Rheology
THERMAL SOLUTIONS
DETERMINATION OF CALCIUM SULFATE HYDRATES IN CEMENT BY DSC
PROBLEM
An essential process in the manufacture of Portland cement is the addition of around 5% gypsum (CaSO4•2H2O)
to control (reduce) the rate of setting. The gypsum is
added to the fused clinker during processing, and the two
are subsequently milled to obtain uniform mixing and the
required particle size. During this milling process the
thermal energy generated may cause partial dehydration of
the gypsum to hemihydrate (CaSO4•0.5H2O) which adversely affects (increases) the rate of setting as well as the
long-term properties of the set cement. Hence, it is of
importance to monitor the amounts of both of these hydrates in the final cement. However, neither chemical nor
X-ray diffraction techniques are able to provide
quantitation at the levels required.
SOLUTION
On the other hand, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC),
which measures the heat flows and temperatures associ-
ated with transitions in materials, does provide a convenient method for quantifying the amounts of gypsum and
hemihydrate present based on the fact that the dehydration
of gypsum occurs as a two-stage endothermic process:
CaSO4•2H2O
*DSC hermetic pan lids with 75µm pinhole (TA Instruments
PN 900860-901).
Figure 2: CEMENT ANALYSIS - HERMETIC PAN
-0.40
-0.20
196.24°C
5.767 J/g
142.69°C
11.00 J/g
129.44°C
Heat Flow (W/g)
-0.45
-0.50
Total Area
18.9 J/g
-0.55
-0.60
CaSO4
Figure 1 shows the DSC results for a typical cement evaluated using an open aluminum pan. In this arrangement, the
two endothermic peaks associated with the successive
dehydration stages are not sufficiently resolved to allow
quantitation. By encapsulating the cement in a hermetically sealed DSC pan with a pinhole in the lid*,however,
these two peaks can be resolved. This improved resolution
results because the atmosphere of water vapor generated
by the first step retards the onset of the second dehydration and moves the peak to a higher temperature. (Figure
2). Studies at the Curtin University of Technology (Perth,
Australia) [1,2] indicate that the best resolution is obtained
using 5-8mg samples in aluminum hermetic pans at 15oC/
minute heating rate.
Figure 1: CEMENT ANALYSIS - UNSEALED PAN
Heat Flow (W/g)
CaSO4•0.5 H2O
-0.30
STAGE 2
-0.40
STAGE 1
205.41°C
-0.50
-0.65
153.34°C
-0.60
139.35°C
-0.70
100
120
140
160
180
Temperature (°C)
200
220
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Temperature (°C)
TS-26
The calculations used to quantify the amounts of gypsum
and hemihydrate initially present from the resolved DSC
peaks in Figure 2 are summarized below:
1) The area associated with the low temperature DSC
endotherm is measured. Using a calibration curve constructed from similar experiments on pure gypsum (Figure
3), the % gypsum present in the cement is then determined.
2) Using the peak area ratio for the two stage dehydration
of pure gypsum (found to be 3.3), the amount of heat in the
second stage of the cement dehydration associated with
the gypsum initially present is determined. Subtracting this
value from the total area of the second stage for the cement
yields the heat (area) associated with hemihyrate initially
present.
3) Using a calibration curve constructed from evaluations
on pure hemihydrate (Figure 4), the % hemihydrate present
in the cement is then determined.
REFERENCES
1. J. Dunn, K. Oliver, G. Nguyen and I. Sills,
Thermochimica Acta, 121 (1987) 181-191.
2. J. G. Dunn, K. Oliver and I. Sills, Thermochimica Acta,
155 (1989) 93-104.
Figure 3: GYPSUM CALIBRATION
Figure 4: HEMIHYDRATE CALIBRATION
7
25
6
20
PEAK AREA (J/g)
PEAK AREA (J/g)
5
15
10
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
4
GYPSUM (%)
5
6
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
HEMIHYDRATE (%)
Acknowledgement: This brief is based on studies by Professors Jeff Dunn and Ian Sills, School of Applied Chemistry,
Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.
For more information or to place an order, contact:
TA Instruments, Inc., 109 Lukens Drive, New Castle, DE 19720, Telephone: (302) 427-4000, Fax: (302) 427-4001
TA Instruments S.A.R.L., Paris, France, Telephone: 33-01-30489460, Fax: 33-01-30489451
TA Instruments N.V./S.A., Gent, Belgium, Telephone: 32-9-220-79-89, Fax: 32-9-220-83-21
TA Instruments GmbH, Alzenau, Germany, Telephone: 49-6023-30044, Fax: 49-6023-30823
TA Instruments, Ltd., Leatherhead, England, Telephone: 44-1-372-360363, Fax: 44-1-372-360135
TA Instruments Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan, Telephone: 813-5434-2771, Fax: 813-5434-2770
Internet: http://www.tainst.com
Thermal Analysis & Rheology
A SUBSIDIARY OF WATERS CORPORATION
TS-26
4