Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CLP criteria for hazard classification of substances and mixtures TA Project: Chemical Safety in Croatia W k h 16-17 Workshop 16 17 JJune 2011 Lennart Dock Swedish Chemicals Agency Physical Hazards CLP Hazard Class Explosives Flammable Gases Fl Flammable bl A Aerosols l Oxidising Gases Gases under pressure Hazard Category Unstable 1 1 1 Div1.1 Div 1.2 Div 1.3 Div 1.4 Div 1.5 Div 1.6 2 2 Compressed gas Liquefied gases Refrigerated liquefied gases Dissolved gases 1 2 3 Flammable Fl bl Li Liquids id 1 2 Flammable Solids Type A Type B Type C Type D Type E Type F Type G Self Reactive Chemicals 1 Pyrophoric Liquids 1 P Pyrophoric h i S Solids lid 1 2 Self Heating Chemicals 1 2 3 Water Reactive - emits Flammable Gases 1 2 3 Oxidising Liquids 1 2 3 O idi i S Oxidising Solids lid Type A Type B Type C Type D Type E Type F Type G Organic Peroxides 1 Corrosive to Metals Criteria for Physical Hazard Classification •UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods Goods, Manual of Tests and Criteria CLP Annex I, Part 2 TDG Class GHS Hazard class 1 E l i Explosives 2 Flammable gases, Oxidising gases, Flammable aerosoles, Gases under p pressure 3 Flammable liquids 4.1 Self-reactive substances and mixtures, Flammable solids 4.2 Pyrophoric liquids, Pyrophoric solids, Self-heating substances and mixtures 4.3 g Substances and mixtures which in contact with water emit flammable gases 5.1 Oxidizing liquids, Oxidizing solids 52 5.2 Organic peroxides 8 Corrosive to metals Also, GHS categories/types/divisions correlates to TDG packing groups Health Hazards CLP Hazard Class Acute Toxicity Oral Dermal Inhalation Hazard Category Serious Eye Damage/Irritation 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Corrosive 1A 1B 1C 1 p y or skin sensitizer Respiratory 1A 1B Germ Cell Mutagenicity 1A 1B 2 Carcinogenicity 1A 1B 2 Reproductive Toxicity 1A 1B 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 Skin Corrosion/Irritation STOT - Single Exposure STOT - Repeated Exposure Aspiration hazard 4 4 4 Irritant 2 2 Lactation Criteria for Health Hazard Classification •Acute toxicity Corrosivity/Irritation (skin and eye) •Corrosivity/Irritation •Sensitisation (respiratory/dermal) •CMR •Specific Target Organ Toxicity and Aspiration CLP Annex I, Part 3 Acute toxicity: substances Category g y1 Category g y2 Category g y3 Category g y4 Oral ((mg/kg g g bw)) ATE ≤ 5 5 < ATE ≤ 50 50 < ATE ≤ 300 300 < ATE ≤ 2000 Dermal (mg/kg/bw) ATE ≤ 50 50 < ATE ≤ 200 200 < ATE ≤ 1000 1000 < ATE ≤ 2000 Gases (ppmV) ATE ≤ 100 100< ATE ≤ 500 500 < ATE ≤ 2500 2500 < ATE ≤ 20000 Vapours (mg/l) ATE ≤ 0,5 0,5 < ATE ≤ 2.0 2,0 < ATE ≤ 10,0 10,0 < ATE ≤ 20,0 Dust/mists (mg/l) ATE ≤ 0,05 0,05 < ATE ≤ 0,5 0,5 < ATE ≤ 1,0 1,0 < ATE ≤ 5,0 Inh halation Exposure p Route ATE = acute toxicity estimate Classification of a mixture based on the acute toxicity of the ingredients 1) Data available for all ingredients 100 ATEmixture Ci i n ATEi =∑ n Ci ATEi = concentration of ingredient ”i” (% w/w or % v/v) = the individual ingredient from 1 to n = the number of ingredients = Acute Toxicity Estimate of ingredient ”i” Classification of a mixture for acute toxicity Concentration ATE Substance 1 1% 225 mg/kg Substance 2 3% 100 mg/kg Substance 3 10% 50 – 300 mg/kg Water 76% Classification acute tox, tox cat 3 Conversion from range value/category to point estimate Exposure Route Category or experimental estimate Converted point estimate 0,5 5 100 500 Dermal (mg/kg/bw) 0 < category 1 ≤ 50 50 < category 2 ≤ 200 200 < category 3 ≤ 1000 1000 < category 4 ≤ 2000 5 50 300 1100 Gases G (ppmV) 0 < category t 1 ≤ 100 100 < category 2 ≤ 500 500 < category 3 ≤ 2500 2500 < category 4 ≤ 20000 10 100 700 4500 Vapours (mg/l) 0 < category 1 ≤ 0,5 0,5 < category 2 ≤ 2,0 2,0 < category 3 ≤ 10,0 10,0 , < category g y 4 ≤ 20,0 , 0,05 0,5 3 11 Dust/mists (mg/l) 0 < category 1 ≤ 0,05 0,05 < category 2 ≤ 0,5 0,5 < category 3 ≤ 1,0 1 0 < category 4 ≤ 5 1,0 5,0 0 0,005 0,05 0,5 15 1,5 In nhalation n Orall O (mg/kg bw) 0 < category 1 ≤ 5 5 < category 2 ≤ 50 50 < category 3 ≤ 300 300 < category 4 ≤ 2000 Classification of a mixture for acute toxicity Concentration ATE Substance 1 1% 225 mg/kg Substance 2 3% 100 mg/kg Substance 3 10% 50 – 300 mg/kg Water 76% 100 ATEmixture 100 ATEmixture 1 = 225 Ci =∑ ATE n 3 + 100 Classification acute tox, tox cat 3 P i t estimate: Point ti t 100 i 10 + 100 ATEmixture = 743 classification: acute tox, cat 4 Skin corrosive or irritant: substances Corrosive* in ≥ 1 of 3 animals category 1: Corrosive Subcategory Exposure Observation 1A ≤ 3 minutes ≤ 1 hour 1B > 3 min to ≤ 1 hour ≤ 14 days 1C > 1 hour to ≤ 4 hours ≤ 14 days **visible i ibl necrosis i th through h th the epidermis and into the dermis Skin corrosive or irritant: substances Criteria category 2: Irritant a)) M Mean value l off ≥2,3 ≥2 3 - ≤ 4 4.0* 0* ffor erythema/eschar th / h or for f oedema d i att least in l t 2 of 3 tested animals from gradings at 24, 48 or 72 hours after patch removal or, if reactions are delayed, from grades in 3 consecutive days after the onset of skin reactions;; or b) Inflammation that persists to the end of the observation period normally 14 days in at least 2 animals, particularly taking into account alopecia (limited area), hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia and scaling; or c) In some cases where here there is pronounced prono nced variability ariabilit of response among animals, with very definite positive effects related to chemical exposure in a single animal but less than the criteria above. * Directive 67/548/EEC: mean value ≥ 2 (2 animals or more) Skin corrosive or irritant: mixtures Sum of ingredients classified l ifi d as: Skin Corrosive Categories 1A, 1B or 1C Concentration triggering classification of a mixture as: Skin Corrosive Category 1* Skin Irritant Category 2 ≥ 5% ≥ 1% but < 5% Skin Irritant Category 2 ≥ 10% (10 x Skin Corrosive Cat. Cat 1A 1A, 1B or 1C) + Skin Irritant Category 2 ≥ 10% *The sum of alla ingredients of a mixture classified as Skin Corrosive Category 1A, 1B or 1C respectively, shall each be ≥ 5% respectively in order to classify the mixture as either Skin Corrosive Category 1A, 1B or 1C. If the sum of the Skin Corrosive Category 1A ingredients is < 5% but the sum of Category 1A+1B ingredients is ≥ 5%, the mixture shall be classified as Skin Corrosive Category 1B. If the sum of the Skin Corrosive Category 1A+1B ingredients is < 5% but the sum of of Category 1A+1B+1C ingredients is ≥ 5% the mixture shall be classified as Skin Corrosive Category 1C. Skin corrosive or irritant: mixtures Ingredient Concentration Mixture classified as: Skin Acid with pH ≤ 2 ≥ 1% Category 1 Base with pH ≥ 11,5% ≥ 1% Category 1 Other corrosive (Cat. 1A, 1B or 1C) ingredients for which additivity does not apply ≥ 1% Category 1 Other irritant (Cat. 2) ingredients for which additivity does not apply, icluding acids and bases. ≥ 3% Category 2 Serious eye damage/eye irritation: substances b t Criteria If when If, h applied li d tto th the eye off an animal, i l a substance b t produces: d • Category 1: Irreversible • effects on the eye At least in one animal effects on the cornea, iris or conjunctiva that are not expected p to reverse or have not fully y reversed within an observation period of normally 21 days; and/or At least in 2 of 3 tested animals, a positve response of: • Corneal opacity ≥ 3 and/or • iritis > 1 1,5 5 Calculated as the mean score following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of the test material Serious eye damage/eye irritation: substances b t Criteria If,, when applied pp to the eye y of an animal,, a substance produces: p • Category 2: Irritating to eyes At least in 2 of 3 tested animals, a positive response of: • • • • Corneal opacity ≥ 1* and/or iritis > 1 and/or conjunctival redness ≥ 2** and/or conjunctival j oedema ((chemosis)) ≥ 2 Calculated as the mean score following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of the test material, and which fully reverses within an observation period of 21 days days. Directive 67/548/EEC: mean scores * ≥ 2 and ** ≥ 2,5 Effects on the eye: y mixtures Sum of ingredients classified as: Eye Effects Category 1 or Ski Corrosive Skin C i Category C t 1A 1B or 1C 1A, Concentration triggering classification of a mixture as: Irreversible Eye Eff t Effects Category 1 Reversible Eye Eff t Effects Category 2 ≥ 3% ≥ 1% but < 3% Eye Effects, Category 2 ≥ 10% (10 x Eye Effects Cat. 1) + Eye Effects Cat. 2 ≥ 10% Skin Corrosive Cat. 1A, 1B or 1C + Eye Effects Cat. 1 10 x (Skin (S C Corrosive C 1A, 1B, 1C Cat. C + Eye Effects Cat. 1) + Eye Effects Cat. 2 ≥ 3% ≥ 1% but < 3% ≥ 10% Effects on the eye: y mixtures Ingredient Concentration Mixture classified as: Eye Acid with pH ≤ 2 ≥ 1% Category 1 Base with pH ≥ 11,5% ≥ 1% Category 1 Other corrosive (Cat. 1) ingredients for which additivity does not apply ≥ 1% Category 1 Other irritant (Cat. 2) ingredients for which additivity does not apply, including acids and bases ≥ 3% Category 2 Respiratory sensitisation: substances Criteria A substance is classified as a respiratory sensitizer: Category 1 a) If there is evidence in humans that the substance can lead to specific respiratory hypersensitivity, and/or b) If there are positive results from an appropriate animal test* S b t Sub-category 1A Substances showing a high frequency of occurrence in humans; or a probability of occurrence of a high sensitization rate in humans based on animal or other tests. Severity of reaction may also be considered Subcategory 1B Substances showing a low to moderate frequency of occurrence in humans; or a probability of occurrence of a low to moderate sensitization rate in humans based on animal or other tests. Severity of reaction may also be considered *presently there are no recognized and validated animal models available 20 Respiratory p y sensitisation: mixtures Ingredient classified as: Concentration triggering classification of a mixture as: Respiratory Sensitiser Category g y1 Solid/Liquid Gas ≥ 0,1%* ≥ 0,1%* ≥ 1,0%** ≥ 0,2%** Respiratory sensitiser Sub-category 1A ≥ 0,1% ≥ 0,1% Respiratory sensitiser Sub-category 1B ≥ 1,0% ≥ 0,2% Respiratory sensitiser Categor 1 Category *This concentration limit is generally used for the application of the special labelling requirements to protect already sensitised iti d iindividuals. di id l A SDS is i required i d ffor th the mixture i t containing t i i an ingredient i di t above b thi this concentration. t ti **This concentration limit is used to trigger classification of a mixture as a respiratory sensitiser. 21 Skin sensitisation: substances Criteria A substance b t is i classified l ifi d as a skin ki sensitiser: iti Category 1 a) If there is evidence in humans that the substance can lead sensitisation byy skin contact in a substantial number of persons, or b) If there are positive results from an appropriate animal test Sub-category 1A Substances showing a high frequency of occurrence in humans and/or a high potency in animals can be presumed to have the potential to produce significant sensitisation in humans. Severity of reaction may also be considered Subcategory 1B Substances showing a low to moderate frequency of occurrence in humans and/or a low to moderate potency in animals can be p presumed to have the p potential to p produce sensitisation in humans. Severity of reaction may also be considered 22 Skin sensitisation: mixtures Ingredient classified as: Concentration triggering gg g classification of a mixture as: Skin sensitiser Category 1 Skin sensitiser Category 1 ≥ 0,1%* ≥ 1,0%** 1 0%** Skin sensitiser Sub-category 1A ≥ 0,1% Skin sensitiser Sub-category 1B ≥ 1,0% *This concentration limit is generally used for the application of the special labelling requirements to protect already sensitised iti d iindividuals. di id l A SDS is i required i d ffor th the mixture i t containing t i i an ingredient i di t above b thi this concentration. t ti **This concentration limit is used to trigger classification of a mixture as a skin sensitiser. 23 Concentration limits for elicitation of components of a mixture* Concentration limits for elicitation Component classified as: Respiratory sensitiser Category 1 Solid/liquid Gas Respiratory sensitiser, sensitiser Category 1 ≥0 0,1% 1% ≥0 0,1% 1% Respiratory sensitiser, Sub-category 1A ≥ 0,01% ≥ 0,01% Respiratory sensitiser, Sub-category 1B ≥ 0,1% ≥ 0,1% Skin sensitiser Category 1 All physical states Ski sensitiser, Skin iti C t Category 1 ≥0 0,1% 1% Skin sensitiser, Sub-category 1A ≥ 0,01% Skin sensitiser, Sub-category 1B ≥ 0,1% *These concentration limit for elicitation is used for the application the special labelling requirements to protect already sensitised individuals. A SDS is required for the mixture containing a component above this concentration. For sensitising substances with specific concentration limit lower than 0,1%, the concentration limit for elicitation should be set at one tenth of the specific concentration limit. 24 Germ cell mutagenicity: substances Category Category 1 Category 1A Category 1B Criteria Substances known to induce heritable mutations or to be regarded as if they induce heritable mutations in the germ cells of humans. The classification in Category 1A is based om positive evidence from human epidemiological studies. Substances to be regarded as if they induce heritable mutations in the germ cells of humans. Classification in Category 1B is based on: • Positive result(s) from in vivo heritable germ cell mutagenicity tests in mammals; or • Positive result(s) from in vivo somatic cell mutagenicity test in mammals, in combination with some evidence that the substance has potential to cause mutations to germ cells. It is possible to derive this supporting evidence from mutagenicity/genotoxicity tests in germ cells in vivo, or by demonstrating the ability of the substance or its metabolite(s) to interact with the genetic material of g germ cells;; or • Positive results from tests showing mutagenic effects in the germ cells of humans, without demonstration of transmission to progeny; for example, an increase in the frequency of aneploidy in sperm cells of exposed people. Germ cell mutagenicity: substances Category Criteria Substances which cause concern for humans owing to the possibility that they may induce heritable mutations in the germ cells of humans Category 2 The classification in Category 2 is based on: • Positive evidence obtained from experiments in mammals and/or in some cases from in vitro experiments, obtained from: • Somatic cell mutagenicity tests in vivo, in mammals; or • Other in vivo somatic cell genotoxicity tests which are supported by positive results from in vitro mutagenicity assays. Substances which are positive in in vitro mammalian mutagenicity assays, and which also show chemical structure activity relationship to known germ cell mutagens, shall also be considered for classfication as category 2 mutagens. Germ cell mutagenicity: g y mixtures Ingredient classified as: Concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as: Category C t 1A mutagen Category C t 1B mutagen Category C t 2 mutagen ≥ 0,1% - - Category 1B mutagen - ≥ 0,1% - Category 2 mutagen - - ≥ 1,0% Category 1A mutagen Carcinogenicity: substances Category Category 1 Criteria Known or p presumed human carcinogens g A substance is classified in Category 1 for carcinogenicity on the basis of epidemiological and/or animal data. A substance may be further distinguished as: Category 1A Known to have carcinogenic potential for humans, classification is largely based on human evidence, or Category 1B Presumed to have carcinogenic potential for humans, classification is largely based on animal evidence The classification in Category 1A and 1B is based on strength of evidence together with additional considerations*. Such evidence may be derived from: considerations • Human studies that establish a casual relationship between human exposure to a substance and the development of cancer (known human carcinogen); or • Animal experiments for which there is sufficient** evidence to demonstrate animal carcinogenicity (presumed human carcinogen) In addition, on a case-by-case basis, scientific judgement may warrant a decision of presumed human carcinogenicity derived from studies showing limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans together with limited evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals animals. *CLP Annex I, section 3.6.2.2 **CLP Annex I, section 3.6.2.2.4 Carcinogenicity: substances Category Category 2 Criteria Suspected human carcinogen The placing of a substance in Category 2 is done on the basis of evidence obtained from human and/or animal i l studies, t di b t which but hi h is i nott sufficiently ffi i tl convincing i i to t place l th substance the b t i Category in C t 1A or 1B 1B, based on strength of evidence together with additional considerations*. Such evidence may be derived either from limited** evidence of carcinogenicity in human studies or from limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animal studies. *CLP Annex I, section 3.6.2.2 **CLP Annex I, section 3.6.2.2.4 Carcinogenicity: g y mixtures Ingredient classified as: Concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as: Category 1A carcinogen Category 1B carcinogen Category 2 carcinogen Category 1A carcinogen ≥ 0,1% - - Category 1B carcinogen - ≥ 0,1% - Category C t 2 carcinogen - - ≥ 1,0%* *If a Category 2 carcinogen is present in the mixture as an ingredient at a concentration ≥ 0,1% a SDS shall be available for the mixture upon request Reproductive toxicity: substances Category Category 1 Criteria Known or p presumed human reproductive p toxicant Substances are classified in Category 1 for reprodutive toxicity when they are known to have produced an adverse effect on sexual function and fertility, or on development, p in humans, or when there is evidence from animal studies, possibly supplemented with other information, to provide a strong presumption that the substance has the capacity to interfere with reproduction in humans. The classification of a substance is further distinguished on the basis of whether the evidence for classification is primarily y from human data or from animal data. Category 1A Known human reproductive toxicant, largely based on evidence from humans Category 1B Presumed human reproductive toxicant, largely based on data from animal studies. Such data shall provide clear evidence of an adverse effect on sexual function and fertility or on development in the absence of other toxic effects, or if occuring together with other toxic effects the adverse effect on reproduction is considered not to be a secondary non-specific consequence of other toxic effects. However, when there is mechanistic information that raises doubt about the relevance of the effect for humans, classification in Category 2 may be more appropriate. Reproductive toxicity: substances Category Category 2 Criteria Suspected human reproductive toxicant Substances are classified in Category 2 for reproductive toxicity when there is some evidence from human or experimental animals, possibly supplemented with other information, of an adverse effect on sexual function and fertility, or on development, and where the evidence is not sufficiently convincing to place the substance in Category 1. If deficiencies in the study make the quality of evidence less convincing, convincing Category 2 could be the more appropriate classification. Such effects shall have been observed in the absence of other toxic effects, or if occuring together with other toxic effects the adverse effect on reproduction is considered not to be a secondary non-specific consequence of other toxic effects. Lactation effects: substances Effects on or via lactation Effects on or via lactation are allocated to a separate single category. It is recognised that for many substances there is no information on the potential to cause adverse effetcs on the offspring via lactation. However, substances which are absorbed by women and have been shown o interfere with lactation lactation, or which may be present (including metablites) in breast milk in amounts sufficient to cause concern for the health of a breastfed child, shall be classified and labelled to indicate this property hazardous to to breastfed babies. This classifiaction can be assigned on: a) Human evidence indicating a hazard to babies during the lactation period; and/or b) Results of one or two generation studies in animals which provide clear evidence of adverse effect in the offspring due to transfer in the milk or adverse effects on the quality of the milk; and/or c) Absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion studies that indicate the likelihood that the substance is present in potentially toxic levels in breast milk. Reproductive p toxicity: y mixtures Ingredient classified as: Concentration limits triggering classification of a mixture as: Category 1A reproductive toxicant Category 1B reproductive toxicant Category 2 reproductive toxicant Effects on or via lactation Category 1A reproductive toxicant ≥ 0,3%* - - - Category 1B reproductive toxicant - ≥0 0,3% 3%* - - Category 2 reproductive toxicant - - ≥ 3,0%* - Effects on or via lactation - - - ≥ 0,3%* *If a Cat. 1 or Cat. 2 reproductive toxicant or a substance classified for effects on or via lactation is present in the mixture as an ingredient at a concentration >0,1%, a SDS shall be available for the mixture upon request. Dir 1999/45/EC: ≥ 0.5% [Cat 1 and 2] and ≥ 5% [Cat 3] Specific target organ toxicity (STOT) – single exposure: substances b t Category Category 1 Criteria Substances that have produced significant toxicity in humans or that, on the basis of evidence from studies in experimental animals, can be presumed to have the potential to produce significant toxicity in humans following single exposure. Substances are classified in Category 1 for specific target organ toxicity (single exposure) on the basis of: a) b) C t Category 2 Reliable and good quality evidence from human cases or epidemiological studies; or Observations from appropriate studies in experimental animals in which significant and/or severe toxic effects, of relevance to human health, were produced at generally low exposure concentrations. Guidance dose/concentration values are provided in CLP Annex I, section 3.8.2.1.9, to be used as part of weight-of-evidence evaluation. Substances S bstances that that, on the basis of e evidence idence from st studies dies in e experimental perimental animals can be presumed to have the potential to be harmful to human health following single exposure. Substances are classified in Category 2 for specific target organ toxicity (single exposure) on the basis of observations from appropriate studies in experimental animals in which significant toxic effects, of relevance to human health, were produced at generally moderate exposure concentrations. Guidance dose/concentration values are provided in CLP Annex I, section 3.8.2.1.9, in order to help in classification. In exceptional cases, cases human evidence can also be used to place a substance in Category 2 (see CLP Annex I, section 3.8.2.1.6.) Specific target organ toxicity (STOT) – single exposure: substances b t Category Category 3 Criteria Transient target organ effects This category only includes narcotic effects and respiratory tract irritation. These are target organ effects for which a substance does not meet the criteria to be classified in Categories 1 or 2 indicated above. These are effects which adversly alter human function for a short duration after exposure and from which humans may recover in a reasonable period without leaving significant alteration of structure or function. function Substances are classified specifically for these effects as laid down in CLP Annex I, section 3.8.2.2 STOT SE: Guidance value ranges Guidance value ranges for:* Route R t off exposure U it Units Oral (rat) mg/kg bw C ≤ 300 300 < C ≤ 2000 Dermal (rat or rabbit) mg/kg bw C ≤ 1000 1000 < C ≤ 2000 Inhalation (rat) gas ppmV/4h C ≤ 2500 2500 < C ≤ 20000 mg/l/4h g C ≤ 10 10 < C ≤ 20 C ≤ 1,0 1,0 < C ≤ 5,0 Inhalation ( t) vapour (rat) Inhalation (rat) dust/mist/fume mg/l/4h C t Category 1 C t Category 2 C t Category 3 Guidance values do not apply (based on human data) *The guidance values are intended for guidance purposes to be used as part of the weight-of-evidence approach and to assist in decision about classification. They are not intended as strict demarcation values. STOT SE: mixtures Ingredient classified l ifi d as: Generic concentration limits triggering gg g classification of the mixture as: Category 1 Category 2 Category 1 STOT ≥ 10% 1 0 ≤ C < 10% 1,0 Category 2 STOT - ≥ 10%* *If a Category 2 specific target organ toxicant is present in the mixture as an ingredient at a concentration ≥ 1,0% a SDS shall be available for the mixture upon request Supporting classification Not supporting classification • • • • • Substance-related deaths Major functional changes in the central ce ta o or pe peripheral p e a nervous e ous systems (sight, hearing, sense of smell) or other organ systems (for example the lung) Severe disturbances (eg haematological disturbances suggesting that they are due to decreased bone marrow production of blood cells) Severe organ damage, especially heart, nervous system, stem cell populations • • • • Only change in body weight gain, food consumption or water intake Small changes (clin chem) which are of doubtful or minimal toxicological importance Changes in organ weights with no evidence of organ dysfuntion Adaptive responses (enzyme i d ti induction, liliver h hypotrophy, t h macrophage migration in the lung) Species-specific mechanism STOT – repeated exposure: substances Category Category 1 Criteria Substances that have produced significant toxicity in humans or that, on the basis of evidence from studies in experimental animals, can be presumed to have the potential to produce significant toxicity in humans following repeated exposure. Substances are classified in Category 1 for specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure) on the basis of: a) b) C t Category 2 Reliable and good quality evidence from human cases or epidemiological studies; or Observations from appropriate studies in experimental animals in which significant and/or severe toxic effects, of relevance to human health, were produced at generally low exposure concentrations. Guidance dose/concentration values are provided in CLP Annex I, section 3.9.2.9, to be used as part of weight-of-evidence evaluation. Substances S bstances that that, on the basis of e evidence idence from st studies dies in e experimental perimental animals can be presumed to have the potential to be harmful to human health following repeated exposure. Substances are classified in Category 2 for specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure) on the basis of observations from appropriate studies in experimental animals in which significant toxic effects, of relevance to human health, were produced at generally moderate exposure concentrations. Guidance dose/concentration values are provided in CLP Annex I, section 3.9.2.9, in order to help in classification classification. In exceptional cases, human evidence can also be used to place a substance in Category 2 (see CLP Annex I, section 3.9.2.6.) STOT RE: Guidance value ranges g Guidance value ranges for:* Route of exposure Units Oral (rat) mg/kg bw/day C ≤ 10 10 < C ≤ 100 Dermall D (rat or rabbit) mg/kg bw/day C ≤ 20 20 < C ≤ 200 Inhalation (rat) gas ppmV/6h/day C ≤ 50 50 < C ≤ 250 mg/l/6h/day C ≤ 0,2 0,2 < C ≤ 1,0 C ≤ 0,02 0,02 < C ≤ 0,2 Inhalation ((rat)) vapour p Inhalation (rat) dust/mist/fume mg/l/6h/day Category g y1 Category g y2 *The guidance values are intended for guidance purposes to be used as part of the weight-of-evidence approach and to assist in decision about classification. They are not intended as strict demarcation values. STOT RE: mixtures Ingredient classified as: Generic concentration limits triggering gg g classification of the mixture as: Category 1 Category 2 Category 1 STOT ≥ 10% 1 0 ≤ C < 10% 1,0 Category 2 STOT - ≥ 10%* *If a Category 2 specific target organ toxicant is present in the mixture as an ingredient at a concentration ≥ 1,0% a SDS shall be available for the mixture upon request Aspiration hazard Aspiration: Entry of a liquid or solid chemical product directly through the oral or nasal cavity, or from vomiting, into the trachea and lower respiratory system. H Hazard: d May result in chemical pneumonia, varying degrees of pulmonary injury or death following aspiration. i ti Data used for classification: Human experience (e.g. workplace) Structure-Activity Relationship (e.g. most hydrocarbons) Phys/chem data (dynamic or kinematic viscosity) Animal studies (limited value) Aspiration toxicity Category Category 1 Criteria Substances known to cause human aspiration toxicity hazards or to be regarded as if they cause human aspiration toxicity hazard. A substance is classified in Category 1: a) b) Based on reliable and good quality human evidence, or If it is a hydrocarbon and has a kinematic viscosity of ≤20,5 mm2/s, measured at 40°C A mixture which contains a total of ≥10% of a substance or substances classified in Category 1, and has a kinematic viscosity of ≤20,5 mm2/s measured at vid 40°C, shall be classified in Category 1. In the case of a mixture which separates into two or more distinct layers, one of which contains ≥10% of a substance classified in Category 1 and has a kinematic viscosity of ≤20,5 mm2/s measured at 40°C, then the entire mixture is classified in category 1. Directive 67/548/EEC: < 7 x 10-6 m2/s (40 °C) 44 Transition from DSD to CLP will lead to reclassification l ifi ti off some mixtures i t Mixture DPD CLP 1-5% of R34 substances Not classified (GCL 5%) Skin irritant Cat. 2 (GCL 1%) 10-20% of R38 substances Not classified (GCL 20%) Skin irritant Cat. 2 (GCL 10%) 1-3% of R41 or R34 substances Not classified (GCL 5%) Eye irritant Cat.2 (GCL 1%) 3-5% of R41 or R34 substances Not classified (GCL 10%) Serious eye damage Cat.1 (GCL 3%) 10-20% of R36 substances Not classified (GCL 20%) Eye y irritant Cat.2 (GCL 10%) 3-5% of R62 or R63 substances Not classified (GCL 5%) Reproductive toxicant Cat.2 (GCL 3%) 0,3-0,5% of R60 or R61 substances Not classified (GCL 0,5%) Reproductive Toxicant Cat.1A/1B (GCL 0,3%) Environmental Hazards CLP Hazard Class Hazard Category Hazardous to the aquatic environment Acute hazard Chronic (Long-term) hazard 1 1 Hazardous to the ozone layer 1 2 3 Note: GHS Categories Acute 2 and Acute 3 are not normally used when considering packaged goods, (but for transport of bulk quantities). Therefore, not part of the EU - Supply and Use system. + 4 Criteria for Environmental Hazard Classification •Hazardous to the aquatic environment •Acute (short-term) hazard •Long-term hazard CLP Annex I, Part 4 •Hazardous H d tto th the ozone llayer CLP Annex I, Part 5 Environmental hazards • Acute (short-term) aquatic hazard – The hazard of a chemical caused by its acute toxicity to an organism during short-term short term aquatic exposure to that chemical chemical. • Long-term g aquatic q hazard – The hazard of a chemical caused by its chronic toxicity following long-term exposure in the aquatic environment. Note! Acute & Long-term hazards ≠ Acute & chronic toxicity Criteria for Acute ((short-term)) aquatic q hazard Based on ACUTE (or SHORT-TERM) AQUATIC TOXICITY Acute toxicity to Fish and/or a d/o Crustacea and/or Aquatic plant Lowest value ≤1 mg/l CATEGORY: ACUTE 1 Multiplying (M) factors • The classifier shall set an M-factor if a substance is classified as Acute1 • Components classified as Acute 1 may have LC50 or EC50 values well below 1 mg/l which influence the toxicity of a mixture and should be given increased weight. Acute toxicity M factor L(E)C50 value 0.1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1 1 0.01 < L(E)C50 0.1 10 0 001 < L(E)C50 0.01 0.001 0 01 100 0.0001 < L(E)C50 0.001 1000 0.00001 < L(E)C50 0.0001 10000 (continue in factor 10 intervals) M-factors are used in the calculation method for f classification f off a mixture Long-term aquatic hazard LACK OF RAPID DEGRADABILITY Biotic/Abiotic BIOACCUMULATION Actual or Potential AQUATIC TOXICITY Ch i (l Chronic (long-term) t ) toxicity t i it The intrinsic property (of a chemical) to cause harm as a result of long term exposure (in relation to the life-cycle of the organism) Generally expressed in terms of: - NOEC ((No Observed Effect Concentration), ), - ECx (x% effect concentration), Normally EC10 Sublethal endpoints e.g. Survival, growth and/or reproduction Note: Chronic toxicity data are often expensive to generate and therefore usually less available than acute data. Criteria for Long-term hazard (categories Chronic 1-3) 1 3) Adequate q chronic toxicity y data available Non-rapidly degradable (NRD) substance Category: g y Chronic 1 NOEC or ECx 0,1 Category: C t Ch Chronic i 2 0,1 < NOEC or ECx 1 Rapidly degradable ( ) substances (RD) Category: g y Chronic 1 NOEC or ECx 0,01 Category: Chronic 2 0.01 < NOEC or ECx 0,1 Category: Chronic 3 0,1 < NOEC or ECx 1 When adequate chronic toxicity data is lacking, differentiation is based on acute toxicity data Acute toxicity y to fish,, crustacea or algae ≤1 mg/l Long g term aquatic q hazard category LACK OF RAPID DEGRADATION CHRONIC 1 AND/OR > 1 to ≤10 mg/l > 10 to ≤100 mg/l CHRONIC 2 BIOACCUMULATION BCF ≥500 OR IF ABSENT, OR, ABSENT LOG Kow ≥4 CHRONIC 3 M-factors • Components classified as Chronic 1 may have L(E)C50 values well below 1 mg/l and/or NOEC/ECx well below 0,1 mg/l which influence the toxicity of a mixture and should be given increased weight. Acute toxicity M factor Chronic toxicity M factor 0.1 < L(E)C50 ≤ 1 1 0.01 < NOEC ≤ 0.1 NRDa components 1 0.01 < L(E)C50 0.1 10 0.001 < NOEC ≤ 0.01 10 1 0.001 < L(E)C50 0.01 100 0.0001 < NOEC ≤ 0.001 100 10 ( ) 50 0.001 0.0001 < L(E)C 1000 0.00001 < NOEC ≤ 0.0001 1000 100 0.00001 < L(E)C50 0.0001 10000 0.000001 < NOEC ≤ 0.00001 10000 1000 L(E)C50 value NOEC value RDb components - (continue in factor 10 intervals) (continue in factor 10 intervals) a Non-rapidly degradable b Rapidly degradable Chronic category 4 • ‘Safety Safety Net Net’ Classification when standard criteria are not met, but there is a concern • Criteria not strictly defined, but one example: poorly soluble substances that are: NOT RAPIDLY DEGRADABLE + BIOACCUMULATIVE Classification of a mixture – summation method Step 1: Mixture classified as Category Chronic 1 if ∑(Chronic Category 1 x M) ≥ 25% Ingr. A Ingr. B Ingr. C 1% 10% 10% 100 75 Chronic 3 50 Chronic 2 25 Chronic 1, M1 Chronic 1,, M10 10% x 1 = 10% 1% x 10 = 10% Chronic 1, M100 10% + 10% = 20% 20%, which hi h iis < 25% 25%. Hence, mixture is not classified as Chronic 1. Classification of a mixture – summation method Step 2: Mixture classified as Category Chronic 2 if ∑(Chronic Category 1 x M x 10) + ∑(Chronic Category 2) ≥ 25% Ingr. A Ingr. B Ingr. C 1% 10% 10% CHRONIC CATEGORY 2 300 Chronic 3 Chronic 2 10% Chronic 1, M1 200 10% x 1 x 10 = 100% 100 Chronic 1,, M10 1% x 10 x 10 = 100% Chronic 1, M100 100% + 100% + 10% = 210%, which is ≥ 25%. Hence, mixture is classified as Chronic 2. Environmental Hazard Hazardous to the ozone layer Substances • if the available evidence concerning its properties and its predicted or observed environmental fate and behaviour indicate that it may present a danger to the structure and/or the functioning of the stratospheric p ozone layer. y Mixtures • Concentration Co ce a o limit 0, 0,1% %