Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Unprecedented levels of GDP growth since the 1950s GDP per capita growth Contributions to global GDP growth Compound annual growth rate, % Population growth 4.7 4.8 3.8 3.1 3.0 1974– 1984 1984– 1994 3.6 2.5 1.9 1.9 1.7 0.9 <0.1 0.1 1–1000 1000– 1500 0.3 1500– 1600 0.5 0.1 1600– 1700 1700– 1820 1820– 1870 1870– 1900 1900– 1913 1913– 1940 1940– 1950 1950– 1964 1964– 1974 SOURCE: Jutta Bolt and Jan Luiten van Zanden, The first update of the Maddison Project: Re-estimating growth before 1820, Maddison Project working paper number 4, University of Groningen, January 2013; UN Population Division; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1994– 2004 2004– 2010 2 “THE GREAT MODERATION” § “Demographic dividend” § Reduced macroeconomic volatility § Cheaper resources § Progressively cheaper capital § Abundant labor § Governments privatizing, cutting taxes, and promising more 3 Four disruptive forces changing the picture Industrialization and urbanization in emerging economies Disruptive technologies An aging world Greater global interconnections 4 3,000 times larger than the UK Industrial Revolution Country Years to double per capita GDP 1700 United Kingdom United States Germany Japan South Korea China India 1800 Population at start of growth period (million) 1900 2000 154 9 53 10 28 65 48 33 22 10 1,023 12 16 822 6 The economic centre of gravity is shifting east and south at an unprecedented speed Earth’s economic center of gravity 1 CE SOURCE: Angus Maddison; University of Groningen; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 7 The economic centre of gravity is shifting east and south at an unprecedented speed Earth’s economic center of gravity 1970 1960 1950 1980 1990 2000 1940 1913 2010 2025 1820 1500 SOURCE: Angus Maddison; University of Groningen; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1 CE 1000 46 of the global top 200 cities will be Chinese by 2025 Global top 200 cities in China, in terms of 2025 GDP New entrants into global top 200 Already in 2010 global top 200 Daqing Urumqi Exceeds 2010 GDP of… Los Angeles Singapore Dubai Harbin Changchun Tianjin Shenyang Baotou Tangshan Changzhou Beijing Shijiazhuang Dalian Kunshan Taiyuan Wuxi Zibo Yantai Jinan Qingdao Suzhou Xuzhou Shanghai Xi’an Zhengzhou Nanjing Hefei Wuhan Chengdu Ningbo Hangzhou Nanchang Chongqing x Guangzhou Changsha Fuzhou Dongguan Taipei Foshan Kunming Nanning Shenzhen Xiamen Kaohsiung Zhongshan Macau SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Hong Kong 9 Technological breakthroughs are speeding up First website 1991 First phone call 1876 Hargreaves’ Jenny 1764 Advanced robotics Internet of things 16 years 115 years Mobile Internet First iPhone 2007 GM’s Unimate 1962 198 years SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Google’s Schaft 2010 Artificial intelligence 48 years 11 Adoption of new technologies is also accelerating Time to reach 50 million users 38 years 13 years 4 years Radio Television Pod SOURCE: Press reports; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 3 years Internet 1 9 year months Facebook Twitter 12 Twelve technologies have significant potential to disrupt Disruptive Dozen Changing the building blocks of everything IT and how we use it Mobile internet Cloud technology Internet of Things Machines working for us Advanced robotics SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis Autonomous and near-autonomous vehicles Automation of knowledge work Next-generation genomics Advanced materials Rethinking energy comes of age 3D printing Energy storage Advanced oil and gas exploration and recovery Renewable energy 13 The population of advanced economies is aging rapidly Global population distribution, % of total population over 60 Advanced economies 2.5% 1.5% Emerging economies Compound annual growth rate 2000–25 35 29 20 19 15 13 12 7 1950 SOURCE: UN Population Division; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 7 1975 7 2000 2025 2050 Networks of global trade flows are expanding and becoming much more interconnected USD 50–100 billion USD 100–500 billion USD 500 billion or more Lines show total trade flows between regions, figures in bubbles show participation in world trade 1990 100% = $1.8 trillion 2013 100% = $17.2 trillion 4% 12% 41% 2% 2% 8% 8% 3% 2% 5% 22% 7% SOURCE: The Conference Board Total Economy Database; UN Population Division; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 32 % 4% 5 % 4 % 6% 32 % 17 The “new world” looks increasingly volatile Number of “3-sigma” days (days when S&P 500 price changes are beyond three standard deviations from mean) 50 40 30 20 10 0 1950 Average days per year 1960 1 SOURCE: Standard & Poor’s; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 1970 1 1980 2 2000 1990 3 3 2010 2014 12 18 No global recession in an unlinked world Real GDP growth, PPP adjusted, % 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 1950 60 SOURCE: World Bank; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 70 80 90 2000 2010 19 The world’s first truly global recession in a linked world Real GDP growth, PPP adjusted, % 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 1950 60 SOURCE: World Bank; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 70 80 90 2000 2010 20 The new economic era will be different in six ways 1. Power of new consumer class 2. Need for resource revolution 3. Farewell to cheaper capital 4. Labor market dislocation 5. Rise of new competitors 6. Trade-offs for governments 21 Nearly 3 billion people will join the consuming class by 2025 World population, billion 53% Share of population in consuming class Consuming class 36% 23% 23% 13% <1% 1.0 1.0 0 1820 3% 1.3 1.2 0.1 1870 7% 4.4 4.0 4.2 2.2 0.1 1900 3.7 2.8 1.5 0.3 1950 SOURCE: Homi Kharas; Angus Maddison; McKinsey Global Institute Cityscope 2.0 Below consuming class 6.8 5.3 3.7 2.5 1.6 7.9 2.4 0.9 1.2 1970 1990 2010 2025 23 Many new consumers will come from little-known “middleweight” cities in emerging markets Advanced Economies Emerging Economies: megacities (popul. of >10M.) Emerging Economies: middleweight cities Emerging Economies: small cities and rural areas Contribution to GDP and GDP growth by type of city, % 100% = $45 trillion GDP growth, 2013–2025 100% = $72 trillion GDP 2012 5% 11% 22% 28% 40% 60% SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute Cityscope 1.1 72% 13% 11% 50% 24 Technology is opening up new routes to these consumers 2003–2013 e-tailing market by country, $ billion Compound annual growth rate, 2003–13, % 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2003 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2013 United States 16 China 105 Japan 20 United Kingdom 15 Germany 20 South Korea 17 France 31 Brazil 26 Russia 37 Canada 14 SOURCE: Euromonitor; Forrester; US Census Bureau; Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry; iResearch; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 25 26 The nature of work is changing – and so are the skills required Employees Job growth Percent Number, 2008–13 Transaction 20 19 36 34 16 -55 Production 44 47 2008 2013 Interaction SOURCE: ABS 6291.0.55.003 Labour Force, Australia, Detailed, Quarterly 338 27 Growing wage inequality in the advanced nations Growth in real, composition adjusted weekly wages for full-time male workers (1963 = 1), 1963-2008 By 2025, the China region alone will be home to almost one-quarter of Fortune Global 500 companies Number of Fortune Global 500 companies 500 500 500 23 23 24 500 500 12 130 26 11 26 34 Africa & Middle East Southeast Asia South Asia 120 Eastern Europe & Central Asia Latin America 477 477 476 China region 370 271 1980 1990 2000 SOURCE: Fortune Global 500; MGI CompanyScope; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 2013 2025 Developed regions Technology will continue to give rise to innovative entrants and disrupt incumbents New normal Advanced incumbents, established start-ups Digital media Tipping point CPG and retail Mainstream customers adopt Retail banking and Insurance New trends emerge Laggard incumbents, drop-off Traditional media Early adopters embrace the new Innovative models start-ups create disruptive business models Time Advanced incumbents begin to adapt Since 2007, the ratio of debt to GDP has increased in most countries Change in debt-to-GDP ratio1, 2007–14 Percentage points Leveraging Ireland 180 Increasing leverage 130 Singapore 120 110 Greece 100 90 China 80 70 60 Finland Malaysia Korea Slovakia 50 Portugal Spain France Italy Belgium Sweden Netherlands Japan Thailand Canada Czech RepublicPoland Hungary Denmark Chile Australia Mexico Turkey United Kingdom Brazil Austria Morocco Russia Indonesia United States Norway Vietnam Nigeria Colombia South Africa Germany Philippines Peru Argentina Romania India Egypt Saudi Arabia Israel 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 Deleveragin g Deleveraging -40 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 1 Debt owed by households, non-financial corporates, and governments. 2 2Q14 data for advanced economies and China; 4Q13 data for other developing economies. SOURCE: Haver Analytics; national sources; McKinsey Global Institute analysis 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 Debt-to-GDP ratio, 2Q141,2 % Over the last two centuries, there has generally been an expectation of advancement 2% Numbers of households with flat or falling income from wages and capital before taxes in 25 advanced economies 1993-2005 70% 2005-2014 Individuals who were younger and less-skilled fared worse than their older, better educated peers Less educated Medium educated Higher educated Average change in labour income for United States labour force members, by age and education attainment lever, 2003 – 13 in % 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES 1 2 3 4 5 Meeting graduate needs within budget constraints Increasing productivity by increasing completion International opportunities and international competition Disruptive models: offence or defence Collaboration in the age of innovation and data 1. MEETING GRADUATE NEEDS WITHIN BUDGET CONSTRAINTS How will we educate more students in an environment of increasing costs and decreasing budgets? ~40 million 39% 400+% SOURCE: OECD Education at a Glance, 2013 SHEEO 2012; McKinsey Global Institute World needs more university graduates Shortfall of highly-skilled workers, globally, in 2020 But costs per student are increasing dramatically... Increase in real expenditures per student between 2000-2010 in OECD countries … while tuition burdens are skyrocketing Increase in cost of higher education tuition since 1985 (household income increased by 109%) 37 1. MEETING GRADUATE NEEDS WITHIN BUDGET CONSTRAINTS Graduates are concerned about the value of their degree Overqualification ~50% Proportion of graduates from four-year colleges who say they are in jobs that don’t require a fouryear degree Regrets ~50% Share of all graduates would choose a different major or a different school SOURCE: McKinsey Voice of the Graduate survey, May 2013. n=4,900 Underpreparedness ~30% Proportion of graduates who do not feel college prepared them well for the world of work Disappointment ~40% Four in ten graduates of top 100 colleges in the US couldn’t get jobs in their chosen field 38 1. MEETING GRADUATE NEEDS WITHIN BUDGET CONSTRAINTS As a result, trust in traditional higher education is decreasing Has your trust in universities/higher education institutions increased, decreased or stayed the same over the past 10 years? Canada 1 20 5 United States 8 England 2 Spain DK/NR SOURCE: Ekos Research Associates, AUCC Survey 2014, N>1000 per country 35 27 7 51 55 46 8 Sweden 71 0% 9 9 45 31 52 20% Decreased 40% 60% Stayed the same 7 9 80% 100% Increased 39 2. INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY BY INCREASING COMPLETION We looked at 117 factors that could determine the probability of dropout for a US university Academic preparedness (e.g. test scores) Enrolment status and history Family background Financial situation Life circumstances Mindsets Engagement 40 2. INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY BY INCREASING COMPLETION Predictive models allow universities to identify specific high-risk students—and why Identify specific high-risk students Student ID 1000 Probability of dropout 33% Risk category Low Determine which factors make them high risk Student ‘scorecard’ Factor Social belonging Grit Risk category High Medium Relevance Low Low … High 62% Medium … Medium 1004 55% Medium … Low 1005 80% High … High 1006 70% Medium … Low 1007 8% Low … High 1008 92% High … Medium 1009 65% Medium … Low 1010 89% High High school GPA Medium 1011 15% Low Scholarship Medium 1001 64% Medium 1002 15% 1003 41 2. INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY BY INCREASING COMPLETION Low cost, brief interventions to shift mindsets have been proven to work—and last Sample interventions and impact Mindset/action Impact Social belonging 1 session Relevance 4–5 essays Grit 1 session SOURCE: 50% decrease 0.8 GPA increase 80% decrease in achievement gap between first year minority and non-minority students after both groups read about how social adversity is a normal aspect of adjusting to college for students with low expectations for achievement after writing essays relating their coursework to their lives in likelihood of dropout after struggling students watched videos of seniors discussing how their grades were low at first but improved over time with hard work http://www.mindsetworks.com/webnav/experiences.aspx; https://web.stanford.edu/dept/psychology/cgi-bin/drupalm/system/files/brainpoints_chi.pdf; Interventions in Education: They’re Not Magic; A Brief Social Belonging Intervention Improves Academic and Outcomes of Minority Students 42 3. INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION Australia cannot take continued growth in education exports for granted Australian annual education exports1 A$B, current prices 20 15 +19% 10 5 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 1 Includes education related travel services and education services SOURCE: ABS 5368 Table 11a 43 3. INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION New competitors are emerging: Asian universities represent 17% of the top 100 universities in the world, up from 12% in 2004 # Schools in top 100, Qs World University Rankings 2004 2013 United States 35 30 -5 Asia 12 17 +5 UK 14 18 +4 Australia 11 8 -3 Others 28 27 -1 SOURCE: Qs World University Rankings Change New entrants from Asia include • Tohoku University • Nagoya University, • Seoul National University • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology • Fudan University • National Taiwan University 44 3. INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION Australia’s tuition fees and living costs are relatively high for international students Net tuition costs for international students, 2013 US$1 Australia (peak forex) 25.4 United States 25.2 Australia (current forex)2 19.9 United Kingdom 19.3 Canada Singapore 18.5 14.9 Living costs for international students, 2013 US$1 13.1 10.5 10.3 11.0 7.5 9.4 1 At July 30, 2013 exchange rate 2 Approximately equal to 2005-2010 average AUD-USD exchange rate of $0.727 SOURCE: HSBC; team analysis 45 4. DISRUPTIVE MODELS: OFFENCE OR DEFENCE New models are creating new competitors for traditional HEIs New competitors are emerging to offer… Examples …cheap or free online content Low cost online degree with full accreditation …more flexible degree pathways Flexible education for adult learners, often based on competency …alternative credentials Industry developed credentials to provide training in coding or clean energy …expanded forprofit offerings Moving beyond traditional test prep into more content-based education 46 5. COLLABORATION IN THE AGE OF INNOVATION AND DATA Institutions of higher learning can contribute strongly to regional economic growth Anchor institution(s) Silicon Valley Boston Zhongguancun Tel Aviv Melbourne SOURCE: Press search Local companies 5. COLLABORATION IN THE AGE OF INNOVATION AND DATA Australian universities conduct world-class research, but commercialisation lags behind other nations We are terrific at research … … but not commercialisation Australian Population & Publications % share globally Number of patents per 1m population Average 2010 - 2012 3.4% 793 USA 331 NZ 303 China 240 UK 0.3% Global Population Global Scientific Publications Citeable research/capita: ~2x U.S. SOURCE: Global Innovation Index; Scopus SCImago Journal; World Development Indicators 7 Singapore Canada Australia 184 132 107 Patents/capita :~ ½ x U.S. 48 5. COLLABORATION IN THE AGE OF INNOVATION AND DATA Australian firms typically weak on innovation & learning and external orientation Australia vs. US average scores (0 = equal to US) DIRECTION -1 COORDINATION & CONTROL ACCOUNTABILITY -2 EXTERNAL ORIENTATION 2 INNOVATION & LEARNING LEADERSHIP 2 -10 CAPABILITIES MOTIVATION 0 -3 CULTURE & CLIMATE -3 SOURCE: McKinsey OHI database, Australia, N = 18,017 (Data as of March 2014) -4 The enduring value of higher education Earning more, fueling growth 35% higher earnings for Australian tertiary graduates Researching and innovating 27% Building communities Regional economic development Attracting talent High-skill immigrants and networks of ambassadors for Australia Developing citizens Ability to exercise critical thinking and contribute to civic society Australian R&D performed by universities SOURCE: OECD Education at a Glance, 2013 & 2014; ABS Gross Expenditure on R&D; McKinsey analysis Externally focused to reset intuition Agile and low cost Optimistic