Download The Big Event

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Telecommunications engineering wikipedia , lookup

Electrician wikipedia , lookup

Ohm's law wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Electrical engineering wikipedia , lookup

War of the currents wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Electric power system wikipedia , lookup

Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Single-wire earth return wikipedia , lookup

Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup

Power electronics wikipedia , lookup

Electrification wikipedia , lookup

Electrical grid wikipedia , lookup

Electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Fault tolerance wikipedia , lookup

Earthing system wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Big Event
Richard P. Bingham, Dranetz-BMI
By now, the "big event" will have come and gone, and in my humble opinion, it probably
have been without anything really eventful, no global disturbances, not the end of the
world as we know it. (Of course, if the world did end, I wouldn't have to worry about
anybody reading this and saying "That's what you said!") As far as I can tell, electrons
don't know what time it is, no less what day of the year, nor what year. For the most
part, they just keep flowing happily along. When they don't, we usually call it "an event",
"a disturbance", or, in geek-speak, "a power quality phenomena." However, what is an
event to one person may be a non-event to another. And what makes up an event to
one person may be a series of events to another.
The key issues here are system operation and system susceptibility. The electric utility
system is designed to respond in a certain manner to certain "events" on the electrical
distribution and transmission systems. Knowledge of how these systems operate,
especially the fault protection portions of them, can be very valuable in determining the
source of a disruption to a process in an industrial facility, or the computer systems in a
data processing center.
The electrical generators produce power at a comparatively low voltage. This voltage is
stepped up through transformers to hundreds of thousands of volts. This is so that it
flows more efficiently, with less losses in the wiring along the way. Transmission
systems at 500KV are not uncommon anymore. These transmission lines fed many
distribution feeders, so a transmission level fault can have vast effects, covering
hundreds of miles. Fortunately, such events are generally rare, since drunk drivers, tree
branches, and critters are less likely to affect these tall towers than the distribution
system poles.
The most common sources of problems on the electric utility system occur on the
distribution system, typically less than 69KV. A typical distribution substation may have
3-7 feeders at 13KV, being supplied off a common voltage buss fed from a transmission
line through a step-down transformer. The most common sources of sags found in a
1976 study in Northern Virginia [1] are shown below, where there were an average of 40
thunderstorms/year.
CAUSE OF SAGS ON DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
CAUSE
Wind and lightning
Utility equipment failure
Construction or traffic accident
Animals
Tree limbs
Unknown
TOTAL
# of OCCURRENCES
37
8
8
5
1
21
80
Richard P. Bingham is the manager of technology and products for Dranetz-BMI.
© copyright March 2000 Electrical Contractor Magazine
www.ecmag.com
PERCENTAGE
46%
10%
10%
6%
1%
26%
When phase-to-ground or phase-to-phase faults occur, the system protection schemes
begin to operate. The typical distribution breaker will wait 6-10 cycles before opening, to
give the fault a chance to clear itself. It will then stay open for a period of time, and try to
reclose to see if the cause of the fault is no longer present. This recloser sequence may
repeat itself for 3-6 times, after which the breaker will be "locked out", requiring human
intervention before the circuit can be re-energized. This lock-out prevents the wire
laying on the drunk driver's car after he/she just hit the utility pole from arcing on and off
continually. However, if the fault was caused by a lightning-induced flashover, the
opening of the breaker should extinguish the arc, and the recloser will be successful.
A good example of the effect on the three phase voltage can be seen in the above
waveforms. When the breaker operated, the voltage returned to normal, indicating the
voltage was being monitored at a site that was on a different feeder than the one where
the fault occurred. Otherwise, the voltage would have gone to zero volts when the
breaker operated, as shown in the next waveforms.
Richard P. Bingham is the manager of technology and products for Dranetz-BMI.
© copyright March 2000 Electrical Contractor Magazine
www.ecmag.com
If the breaker operated several times before the fault was cleared, those using the
electricity may experience a series of voltage sags, which may have a different effect on
their process than just one sag. For example, if the process successfully road through
the first sag, but it depleted some the stored energy in the power supply, it may be the
second sag that trips the process of line. Or each sag may have caused a quality
problem on the product being extruded. To the electric utility company, this sequence is
often called just one event, since there was one problem that the system properly
reacted to try to eliminate. However, the consumer of the electricity may have a quite
different perspective. When the such "aggregration" rules were applied to the
benchmark study conducted of 100 distribution feeders as part of the EPRI DPQ project,
it obviously reduced the number of events per feeder.
Richard P. Bingham is the manager of technology and products for Dranetz-BMI.
© copyright March 2000 Electrical Contractor Magazine
www.ecmag.com
6060
Phase A Vol t age
RMS Va r i a t i on
Febr uar y 2 0 ,
1 9 9 4 a t 1 7 : 5 3 : 0 3 GMT
Tr i gger
Vol t age ( %)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Dur at i on
0. 617 Sec
Mi n 0. 179
Ave 85. 11
Max 139. 5
Vol t age ( %)
0
0. 25
0
25
0. 5
0. 75
1
1. 25
Ti me ( Seconds)
1. 5
1. 75
150
100
50
0
- 50
- 100
- 150
50
75
100 125
Ti me ( mSeconds)
150
175
200
BMI / El ect r ot ek
Even more confusing can be events that have multiple power quality phenomena
characteristics in them. As shown in the below waveforms, Phase A experiences first a
swell, then a sag, and finally an interruption from a fault on another phase of a high
impedance grounded system-- one event or three?
The moral of the story is to be sure that you are speaking the same language with
another power quality person when trying to determine what the event was, and what
caused it. It is often a matter of perspective.
1- Berutti, Al, and R.M.Waggoner, Practical Guide to Quality Power for Sensitive Electronic
Equipment, EC&M, Based on Materials originally written by John A. DeDad and editors of EC&M,
Intertec Publishing Corp, 1993
Richard P. Bingham is the manager of technology and products for Dranetz-BMI.
© copyright March 2000 Electrical Contractor Magazine
www.ecmag.com