Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
4/8/2016 Conflict of Interest Statement Laser Corneal Surgery using an Apple I‐Pad instead of an operating microscope* JOHNS HOPKINS CURRENT CONCEPTS VAIL, MARCH 2016 James J. Salz, MD Harry G. Glen, MD Leonard Teye‐Botchway, MD Stephen D. Klyce, PhD James J. Salz, MD has received travel & research support from NTK Enterprises Harry G. Glen, MD is a paid consultant to NTK Enterprises Leonard Teye‐Botchway, MD has no financial interest Stephen D. Klyce, PhD Is a paid consultant to NTK Enterprises *This investigational device is not yet FDA approved for use in the USA NTK Optimal Keratoplasty (Opti-K®) – For Presbyopia & Low Hyperopia Opti-K® is a laser procedure of cornea reshaping for temporary reduction of symptoms of presbyopia and low hyperopia while maintaining or improving distance visual acuity and minimizing epithelial damage and discomfort. Opti‐K Laser and Apple I‐Pad System Laser and I‐Pad mounted over the patient in Bermuda setting with surgeon Leonard Teye‐Botchway, MD ready to perform the surgery. Lighted applanation suction ring with sapphire window on eye with laser probe ready to be placed into cone, centered, and secured with magnets in bottom of cone. 16 paracentral spots of laser energy (cw thulium fiber laser:1.93 µm Wavelength in a probe) are delivered to the cornea in 2.5 seconds while the epithelium is protected from thermal damage with a lighted, sapphire applanation window suction ring (SAWSR) mounted in a conical holder. The procedure can be performed in the office under topical anesthesia with an Apple I-Pad instead of an operating microscope to center the laser application over the pupil. Apple I‐Pad view of suction ring applied and well centered over pupil View of reticule in suction ring and Laser spots 10 min post-Tx pupil through the I‐Pad Screen Pt. RH 52 yo Female • • • • • • Pre-op 1 day 1 week 1 month 1 year 2 years MRSE +1.75 D -1.00 D -0.50 D +0.25 D +0.63 D +0.25 D UDVA 20/63 20/32 20/20 20/16 20/25 20/25 UNVA 20/100 20/25 20/32 20/40 20/40 20/50 1 4/8/2016 Pt RH 38 mos po OptiK x 1 Pt very happy with VA OS Slit lamp photo Pt RH 38 mos PO OptiK x 1 UCVA 20/25 J3 Ref= Plano Spots barely visible Video of Procedure with pupil centration using the I‐Pad FDA Study Revised Protocol 2015 • Patients included had normal eyes with a stable refraction, were 40 and older with low hyperopia defined as manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) between +0.63 to +2.5 D, and distance uncorrected visual acuity (D‐UCVA) between 20/63‐2 and 20/32+2. Bromfenac ophthalmic solution, 0.07%, was used post‐operative (1 drop after treatment Centration Results of 104 Eyes Examples: 0.02mm is almost perfectly centered while 0.28mm is slightly decentered Average decentration was 0.186 mm which is not clinically significant. Only 1 eye was decentered by more than 0.5 mm (0.51 mm). Results at 1 Month The dominant eyes of the first 4 patients with low hyperopia were treated on Nov. 30, 2015. There were no complications: patients were comfortable. MRSE: 1.09±0.19(S.D.)D pre-op, -0.34±0.35D at 1 day, -0.10±0.29D at 1 week, and 0.10±0.31D at 1 month. Distance uncorrected visual acuity of the treated eyes averaged 20/34 (LogMAR 0.235±0.150) pre-op, 20/20 (LogMAR 0.000±0.099) at 1 day, 20/17 (logMAR -0.075±0.030) at 1 week, and 20/14 (logMAR -0.145±0.060 at 1 month. 2 4/8/2016 SummaryPatientTKTreatmentsandocularmeasurements . Binocular(B)UDVAandUNVAvaluesareshown.*Cycloplegic refractionmeasurements;md:missingdata. 1 month data‐ 4 eyes After 9th Rx the patient was examined in Miami by Dr. William Trattler (She later had a 10th treatment in Nassau) Summary of examination in Miami by Dr. Trattler Date 4-08 MRSE (D) +2.50 OU Add (D) +1.00 OU B-UDVA 20/20 B-UNVA 20/50 5-08 Plano +1.50 OD, +1.75 OS 20/20 20/50 1m Post-1st Tx (4-08) Comments Pre-Tx 1-09 +0.75 OU +1.50 OU 20/20 20/40 7m Post-2nd Tx (5-08) 4-10 +1.75 OU +1.75 OU 20/32 20/80 22m Post-2nd Tx (5-08) 11-10 +1.38 OD, +1.50 OS +2.00 OU 20/16 20/50 4m Post-3rd Tx (7-10) 4-11 +1.50 OD, +1.25 OS +1.75 OU 20/20 20/50 9m Post-3rd Tx (7-10) 6-11 +0.88 OU +1.75 OU 20/25 20/32 2m Post-4th Tx (4-11) 10-11 +1.13 OD, +0.88 OS +1.75 OU 20/20 20/40 3m Post-5th Tx (6-11) 5-12 +1.00 OD, +0.88 OS +2.00 OU 20/25 20/50 5m Post-7th Tx (12-11) 10-12 +0.88 OU +1.75 OU 20/20 20/50 4m Post-8th Tx (6-12) 1-13 +0.88 OD, +0.63 OS +1.75 OU 20/20 20/40 3m Post-9th Tx (10-12) 2-13 +0.75 OD, plano OS* n/a md md 4m Post-9th Tx (10-12) 6-13a +1.13 OU +1.75 OU 20/25 20/50 8m Post-9th Tx (10-12) 6-13b md md 20/20 20/25 Imd Post-10th (6-13) Pt. TK Nassau SL Photos OU in Miami showing faint subepithelial opacities UCVA was 20/30 OU MR OD +0.75 D OS Plano Endo counts WNL, Slit lamp exam showed multiple faint paracentral opacities best visualized on retro‐illumination Topography showed symmetrical central steepening Magellan Topos 4 ½ yrs Post Op The patient reported no symptoms of glare or halos and was pleased with the results of her treatment Summary Use of an Apple I‐Pad allows laser corneal surgery to be performed in an office setting. There are millions of pure presbyopic, low hyperopic presbyopes, and near emmetropic, presbyopic post LASIK, PRK, and lens Implant patients who are potential candidates for this procedure. Many of these patients are risk adverse and might consider a very simple, safe, office based, low cost procedure to improve their vision. Opti‐ K is expected to regress over time and require retreatments, but the concept of paying for re‐ treatments is well accepted with botox and fillers. See e‐poster by Salz, et al reporting a patient who had bilateral Opti‐K treatments 10 times over a 4 ½ year period. 3