Download Suppliant, Guest, and the Power of Zeus in Homeric Epic

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Troy wikipedia , lookup

Greek mythology in popular culture wikipedia , lookup

Castor and Pollux wikipedia , lookup

Hades wikipedia , lookup

Argonautica wikipedia , lookup

Mycenae wikipedia , lookup

Hera wikipedia , lookup

The Penelopiad wikipedia , lookup

Homer wikipedia , lookup

Age of Mythology wikipedia , lookup

The World's Desire wikipedia , lookup

Odyssey wikipedia , lookup

Odysseus wikipedia , lookup

Achilles wikipedia , lookup

Homeric scholarship wikipedia , lookup

Zeus wikipedia , lookup

Troy series: Characters wikipedia , lookup

The God Beneath the Sea wikipedia , lookup

Geography of the Odyssey wikipedia , lookup

Historicity of Homer wikipedia , lookup

Trojan War wikipedia , lookup

Iliad wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Suppliant, Guest, and the Power of Zeus in Homeric Epic
Miriam Tworek-Hofstetter (University of Texas, Austin)
4A5
Occasions of supplication in the Iliad and the Odyssey are strikingly similar to one
another, as well as to descriptions of supplication in later Greek literature. Identical gestures,
such as the grasping of the knees or chin, are used, and when physical contact is impossible, a
specialized vocabulary figuratively indicates the same motions (i.e. γουνάζοµαι). Although the
poems describe supplication in similar terms, there is a striking difference between the outcomes
of supplication scenes in the Iliad and the Odyssey: most supplications in the Odyssey are
successful, while the Iliad’s suppliants, in all cases but one, fail. In his 1973 article “Hiketeia”,
John Gould addresses the question of what may cause a supplication to fail, suggesting that it
depends on the completeness of the act, and whether or not contact between suppliant and
supplicated is maintained (p. 77). The outcome may also be influenced by the setting in which
the supplication takes place; perhaps the rules of warfare, as explained to Menelaus by
Agamemnon, do not allow for supplication on the battlefield (Il. 6.55-65). What is most
distinctly different, however, is the degree to which the gods are present in the act. The
supplication of Priam by Achilles (the only successful supplication in the Iliad) takes place
inside Achilles’ home, and—unlike all other Iliad supplications—includes the participation of
the gods and, in particular, of Zeus. In the Odyssey, on the other hand, Zeus Ἱκετήσιος, the
guardian of suppliants, is commonly invoked. Moreover, the household setting of Priam’s
supplication and the involvement of Zeus draws connection between the institution of
supplication and ritualized xenia, in which Zeus also plays the role of guardian.
The aim of this paper is to identity the presence of Zeus Ἱκετήσιος in the Iliad, where he
remains unnamed. The supplication scenes I will discuss are: Priam to Achilles, Odysseus to the
Cyclops, and Odysseus to Arete; xenia will come into play through the simile at the beginning of
the Achilles and Priam sequence, which juxtaposes the situations of guest and suppliant. Zeus,
protector of both the suppliant and the guest, is also called upon by Odysseus in his supplication
of the Cyclops. The supplication of Arete by Odysseus is nearly identical to that of Achilles and
Priam, allowing us to see the events of Priam’s supplication to Achilles replayed in the Odyssey
with the explicit involvement of Zeus the guardian of suppliants.
Gould, J., “Hiketeia”, JHS 93 (1973) 74–103.