Download MicroRNA-29a and microRNA-142-3p are

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
PHAGOCYTES, GRANULOCYTES, AND MYELOPOIESIS
MicroRNA-29a and microRNA-142-3p are regulators of myeloid differentiation
and acute myeloid leukemia
*Xiao-Shuang Wang,1 *Jia-Nan Gong,1 Jia Yu,1 Fang Wang,1 Xin-Hua Zhang,2 Xiao-Lin Yin,2 Zhen-Qing Tan,3 Zi-Mian Luo,3
Gui-Hua Yang,1 Chao Shen,1 and Jun-Wu Zhang1
1National Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical
College, Beijing, China; 2Haematology Department, 303 Hospital, Nanning, China; and 3Haematology Department, Central Hospital of Xiangtan, Xiangtan,
China
Although microRNAs (miRNAs) are increasingly linked to various physiologic
processes, including hematopoiesis, their
function in the myeloid development is
poorly understood. We detected upregulation of miR-29a and miR-142-3p during myeloid differentiation in leukemia
cell lines and CD34ⴙ hematopoietic stem/
progenitor cells. By gain-of-function and
loss-of-function experiments, we demonstrated that both miRNAs promote the
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate–induced
monocytic and all-trans-retinoic acidinduced granulocytic differentiation of HL-
60, THP-1, or NB4 cells. Both the miRNAs
directly inhibited cyclin T2 gene, preventing the release of hypophosphorylated
retinoblastoma and resulting in induction
of monocytic differentiation. In addition, a
target of miR-29a, cyclin-dependent kinase 6 gene, and a target of miR-142-3p,
TGF-␤–activated kinase 1/MAP3K7 binding protein 2 gene, are involved in the
regulation of both monocytic and granulocytic differentiation. A significant decrease of miR-29a and 142-3p levels and
an obvious increase in their target protein
levels were also observed in blasts from
acute myeloid leukemia. By lentivirusmediated gene transfer, we demonstrated
that enforced expression of either miR29a or miR-142-3p in hematopoietic stem/
progenitor cells from healthy controls
and acute myeloid leukemia patients
down-regulated expression of their targets and promoted myeloid differentiation. These findings confirm that miR-29a
and miR-142-3p are key regulators of normal myeloid differentiation and their reduced expression is involved in acute
myeloid leukemia development. (Blood.
2012;119(21):4992-5004)
Introduction
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous group of blood
cancers characterized by increased, uncontrolled proliferation of
hematopoietic progenitors, and a blockage in myeloid differentiation is the major characteristic of AML.1 According to the
French-American-British classification system, AMLs involving
the monocytic and granulocytic lineage account for 85% (M1 to
M5 subtypes) of adult patients.2 Under normal conditions, monocytes and granulocytes develop from long-term hematopoietic stem
cells (LT-HSCs) in BM under the influence of a complex network
of cytokins such as G-CSF, GM-CSF, and M-CSF, and transcription factors such as PU.1, C/EBP, IFN consensus sequence binding
protein/IFN regulatory factor 8, Krüppel-like factor 4, c-Maf, and
C/EBP⑀.3-6
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) that negatively regulate gene expression at posttranscriptional level7 have also been identified as crucial
regulators in normal and malignant myeloid differentiation. Expression and function analyses have unraveled their important regulatory roles during hematopoiesis.8
In a previous study, we demonstrated a significantly decreased
expression of miR-29a and 142-3p in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) from AML patients (French-AmericanBritish M1 to M5 subtypes).9 These 2 miRNAs were also reported
to be down-regulated in a variety of tumors and to act as tumor
suppressors.10-12 The miR-29a cluster is one of the most studied
miRNA clusters. Down-regulation of miR-29a was observed in
AML samples with deletions of 7q (del7q).10 Several genes have
been reported to be silenced by miR-29, most of which are potential
oncogenes, such as SKI, Tcl1, the p53 upstream inhibitors p85a and
CDC42, and the Bcl2 family members Bcl2 and Mcl1.11 Meanwhile, miR-142-3p, first identified as being uniquely expressed in
hematopoietic system, is aberrantly expressed in T-cell and B-cell
leukemia.12 In addition, increased miR-142-3p expression has been
observed at different stages of normal granulocytopoiesis.13Validated
targets of miR-142-3p include ADCY9,14 CD133,15 IL-6,16 and
the RAC1.17
In this study, we sought to investigate role of these 2 miRNAs in
monocytic and granulocytic differentiation (also called myeloid
differentiation), and to test whether their down-regulation is related
to the differentiation block in AML blasts. Using the leukemia cell
lines, NB4, HL-60, and THP-118-23 we observed up-regulation of
miR-29a and miR-142-3p expression during all-trans-retinoic acid
(ATRA)–induced granulocytic differentiation and phorbol 12myristate 13-acetate (PMA)–induced monocytic differentiation,
and examined effects of overexpression or knockdown of each
miRNA on myeloid differentiations. Moreover, we identified
targets of both miRNAs and examined direct effect of the target
genes on myeloid differentiation. Similar results were also obtained
in myeloid induction cultures of CD34⫹ hematopoietic stem/
progenitor cells (HSPCs) derived from normal human umbilical
cord blood (UCB) and BM from healthy donors and AML patients.
Submitted October 16, 2011; accepted March 22, 2012. Prepublished online as
Blood First Edition paper, April 4, 2012; DOI 10.1182/blood-2011-10-385716.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby
marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
*X.-S.W. and J.-N.G. contributed equally to this study.
The online version of this article contains a data supplement.
4992
© 2012 by The American Society of Hematology
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
Based on these examinations, we demonstrated that miR-29a and
miR-142-3p are important regulators of normal myeloid differentiation and AML development and that they function at least partially
though direct suppression of their common target gene, cyclin T2
(CCNT2), and their individual target genes cyclin-dependent
kinase 6 (CDK6) and TGF-␤ activated kinase 1/MAP3K7 binding
protein 2 (TAB2), respectively.
Methods
Cell culture and differentiation induction
The human leukemia cell lines NB4, HL-60, and THP-1 and human
embryonic kidney cell lines 293T and 293TN were maintained in proper
media (supplemental Methods, available on the Blood Web site; see the
Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article).
The granulocytic differentiation of NB4 and HL-60 was induced with
ATRA (Sigma-Aldrich) and the monocytic differentiation of THP-1 and
HL-60 with PMA (Sigma-Aldrich; supplemental Methods). The mRNA
expression levels of cell surface markers CD11b, CD14, and CSF1R for
monocytic and CD11b, CSF3R, and MPO for granulocytic differentiation
were determined by real-time PCR. CD11b and CD14 levels were also
determined by flow cytometry on a FACSAria (BD Biosciences) or Accuri
flowC6 (BD Biosciences). Morphology was evaluated by conventional
light-field microscopy of May-Grünwald-Giemsa–stained cytospins using
the Olympus BX51 (Japan) optical microscopy. Cells were also stained
using the nitroblue tetrazolium assay (supplemental Methods).
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis of mRNAs and miRNAs, and
real-time PCR assays
See supplemental Methods.
PAGE-northern and Western blot
Northern blot analysis of miRNAs and Western blot analysis of proteins
were performed as described previously.24 Monoclonal mouse anti-CCNT2
antibody (Abcam), monoclonal mouse anti-CDK6 antibody, monoclonal
rabbit anti-TAB2 antibody, polyclonal rabbit anti-pRb antibody (Ser
807/811), and monoclonal mouse anti-Rb antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) were used for Western analysis. The immunoblots were quantified
using Gelpro Version 4.0 software.
Cell transfection with miRNA mimics and siRNAs
For cell transfection with miRNA mimics and miRNA inhibitors, or with
small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) against the miRNA target mRNAs, see
supplemental Methods. For each cell transfection, 2 or 3 replication
experiments were performed.
Luciferase miRNA target reporter assay
The full length of the 3⬘-untranslated regions (UTRs) of human CCNT2,
CDK6, and TAB2 mRNAs was each PCR amplified and cloned into the
pMIR-REPORT Luciferase Reporter Vector (Ambion) to generate the
reporters. Mutations of the predicted seed regions in these 3 mRNA
sequences were created using primers, including the mutated sites. The
luciferase miRNA target reporter assay is described in supplemental
Methods.
Cell viability and cell cycle assay
Cellular proliferation and cell cycle were analyzed using the Cell Counting
Kit-8 (Dojindo Laboratories), and intracellular DNA was measured via flow
cytometry as described in supplemental Methods.
miR-29a AND miR-142-3p AND MYELOID DIFFERENTIATION
4993
CD34ⴙ cell separation and granulocytic and monocytic
induction culture
Human UCB was obtained from normal full-term deliveries from Beijing
Hospital. The peripheral blood samples and BM samples from normal
volunteers and AML patients were obtained from the 303 Hospital and the
Central Hospital of Xiangtan. The informed consent was obtained from all
of the examined subjects in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki,
and the related studies were approved by the ethics committees of the
participating hospitals and institute. MNC fractions were isolated from the
samples by Percoll density gradient (d ⫽ 1.077; GE Healthcare), and the
MNC fractions were enriched for CD34⫹ HSPCs using magnetic-activated
cell sorting technology according to the manufacturer’s recommendations
(Miltenyi Biotec). The CD34⫹ cells were cultured in granulopoietic and
monocytopoietic induction cultures as described in supplemental Methods.
The developmental maturation of the differentiated cells was confirmed by
observing cytospins as well as the expression of cell surface markers.
Lentiviral production and transduction
The self-inactivating transfer vector pMIRNA1, control plasmid, and the
packaging kit System Biosciences were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA fragments 500 bp in size containing the pre-miR-29a
or pre-miR-142 were inserted under the CMV promoter in pMIRNA1. After
virus packaging, the recombinant lentivirus particles were harvested and
titrated as described in supplemental Methods. The CD34⫹ cells were
transduced after 24 hours of expansion with IL-3 and SCF by adding
lentivector supernatants (Lenti-miR-29a, Lenti-miR-142, and Lenticontrol) to the cells at an MOI of 50 in the presence of polybrene
(5 ␮g/mL). The cells were washed the next day with PBS and plated for
colony-forming experiments (supplemental Methods) and liquid cultures.
Results
miR-29a and miR-142-3p expression increases during myeloid
differentiation of THP-1, NB4, and HL-60
To investigate whether miR-29a and miR-142-3p participate in
myeloid differentiation, we first examined their expression during
myeloid differentiation of THP-1, NB4, and HL-60. Cell differentiation was monitored by evaluating the expression of myeloidspecific surface markers CD11b (a marker of both granulocytic and
monocytic cell differentiation), and CD14 (a marker of monocytic
cell differentiation), by flow cytometry (supplemental Figure 1A).
Real-time PCR analysis revealed a gradual increase in the expression of both the 2 miRNAs during PMA-induced monocytic
differentiation of THP-1 and ATRA-induced granulocytic differentiation of NB4 cells (supplemental Figure 1B). The same results
were also observed in HL-60 cells subjected to monocytic and
granulocytic differentiation (supplemental Figure 1B). These expression patterns were also confirmed by Northern blot analysis using
the antisense DNA sequences of mature miR-29a and miR-142-3p
as probes (supplemental Figure 1C).
miR-29a and miR-142-3p promote ATRA- and PMA-induced
myeloid differentiation
To examine the functional relevance of miR-29a and miR-142-3p
with myeloid differentiation, we transiently transfected THP-1,
HL-60, and NB4 cells with either miR-29a or miR-142-3p mimics
or a scramble control. Transfection efficiency was confirmed by
semiquantitative PCR and real-time PCR (Figure 1A; supplemental
Figure 2A). After miR-29a or miR-142-3p mimic transfection, flow
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
4994
WANG et al
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
Figure 1. Transfection of THP-1 and NB4 cells with miRNA mimics or antisense inhibitors for miR-29a and miR-142-3p affects myeloid differentiation. (A) The
expression levels of miR-29a and miR-142-3p were detected by RT-PCR (left) and real-time PCR (right) in THP-1 and NB4 cells that were transiently transfected with miRNA
mimics or mimic scramble control. U6 snRNA was used as an internal control. The values of each group were expressed as mean ⫾ SD for 3 real-time PCR assays.
(B) Expression of CD11b in THP-1 and NB4 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Numbers in the graphs represent the percentages of positively stained cells at 72 hours of
PMA or 96 hours of ATRA treatment (black histograms) compared with untreated cells (red histograms). A representative experiment of 3 is presented. The differences are
statistically significant (see supplemental Figure 2B). (C) Representative May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining of THP-1 and NB4 cells transfected with microRNA mimics or
scramble, and treated with PMA or ATRA for 72 hours. Images were captured at room temperature using 20⫻ objective with numeric aperture 0.5 and acquired through CCD
DP72 camera and Cellsens Standard Version 1.2.1 software (Olympus). The mild differentiated cells were annotated by gray arrows. Mature macrophages and segmented
neutrophils after 72 hours of differentiation were annotated by black arrows, and their percentages were marked. More mature monocytes show bluish-gray cytoplasm and a
saddle-shaped nucleus. More mature granulocytic cells show polylobular nuclei, a decreased ratio of nuclear area to cytoplasmic area, and decreased cytoplasm staining,
corresponding to band cells and metamyelocytes. (D) Expression levels of CD14 or CD11b mRNA were analyzed by real-time PCR. Comparative real-time PCR was
performed in triplicate and normalized to GAPDH mRNA. Error bars represent SD. The expression of the mRNA in untreated scramble-transfected cell was normalized as 1.
(E) Nitroblue tetrazolium assay in NB4 and HL-60 cells transfected with miR-29a mimic, miR-142-3p mimic, or mimic control. (F) Real-time PCR analysis of the expression
levels of miR-29a and miR-142-3p in THP-1 and NB4 cells transfected with miR-29a inhibitor (anti-29a), miR-142-3p inhibitor (anti–142-3p), or inhibitor control (anticontrol). U6
snRNA was used as an internal control. (G) Expression levels of CD14 in THP-1 cells and CD11b in HL-60 cells were analyzed by FACS. A representative experiment of 3 is
presented. The differences are statistically significant (see supplemental Figure 2F). *P ⬍ .05 (Student t test). **P ⬍ .01 (Student t test).
cytometric analysis revealed a significantly higher percentage of
CD11b-positive cells among the PMA-treated THP-1 cells, as well
as among the ATRA-treated NB4 cells compared with the cells
transfected with the scramble control (Figure 1B; supplemental
Figure 2B).
miR-29a or miR-142-3p mimic transfection also induced morphologic changes in the cells after monocytic and granulocytic
differentiation. May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining showed slightly
morphologic changes in untreated cell populations of THP-1 and
NB4 cell populations transfected with miR-29a or miR-142-3p
mimic. However, after induction for 72 hours with PMA, THP-1
cells transfected with miR-29a or miR-142-3p mimic showed a
significantly greater fraction of more mature monocytes (Figure 1C
left). Similarly, after induction for 72 hours with ATRA, NB4 cells
transfected with miR-29a or miR-142-3p showed a significantly
greater fraction of more mature granulocytic cells (Figure 1C
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
right). These morphologic changes were corroborated by examining stained HL-60 cells transfected with miR-29a mimic, miR142-3p mimic, or scramble control and treated with PMA or ATRA
for 72 hours (supplemental Figure 2C).
We next analyzed the effect of miR-29a and miR-142-3p on the
mRNA levels of differentiation markers by real-time PCR (Figure
1D). The results were consistent with flow cytometry and morphologic observation. In summary, transfection with miR-29a or
miR-142-3p mimic resulted in an elevated expression of CD11b,
CD14, CSF1R (supplemental Figure 2D), and CSF3R (supplemental Figure 2E) mRNAs. In contrast, a decreased level of myeloperoxidase mRNA, which is expressed only during the late myeloblast
and promyelocyte stages and disappears during later stages of
neutrophilic development, was observed in the cells transfected
with miR-29a or miR-142-3p mimic (supplemental Figure 2E). The
acceleration of maturation resulting from miR-29a or miR-142-3p
transfection was also confirmed by nitroblue tetrazolium staining
(Figure 1E), which showed enhanced oxidative ability in ATRAtreated NB4 and HL-60 cells. These results suggested that the
enforced expression of miR-29a and miR-142-3p promotes the
PMA-induced monocytic and ATRA-induced granulocytic
differentiation.
Antisense inhibitors directed against either miR-29a or miR142-3p (anti-29a or anti–142-3p) were then transfected into THP-1
and NB4 cells, and knockdown of the targeted miRNA was
confirmed (Figure 1F). The THP-1 cells were then allowed to
undergo PMA treatment for 72 hours, and reduced expression of
CD14 antigen was observed in anti–miR-29a– and anti–miR-1423p–treated cells (Figure 1G top; supplemental Figure 2F). The
percentage of CD11b-positive cells was also modestly decreased in
ATRA-induced NB4 cells transfected with miR-29a or miR-142-3p
inhibitors (Figure 1G bottom; supplemental Figure 2F). Taken
together, the reduced expression of miR-29a and miR-142-3p
suppresses the myeloid differentiation of THP-1 and NB4 cells.
We next verified whether transfection of the 2 miRNAs
simultaneously could enhance their ability to promote differentiation. As determined by flow cytometry, cotransfection of the
2 miRNAs exhibited a more obvious effect on the differentiation of
both lineages than single transfection before induced differentiation, but after 72 hours treatment with PMA or ATRA the enhanced
effect of promoting differentiation by the cotransfection is not
significant (supplemental Figure 3).
CCNT2 was identified as a common target of miR-29a and
miR-142-3p
We identified several potential targets of miR-29a or miR-142-3p
using the prediction programs TargetScan and Pictar, including the
CCNT2 mRNA, which contains sequence motifs that match with
the “seed” sequence of miR-142-3p and miR-29a in its 3⬘-UTR
(Figure 2A). To test whether miR-29a and miR-142-3p are able to
regulate CCNT2 directly, we made a reporter construct carrying the
wild-type CCNT2 3⬘-UTR (pCCNT2_WT), constructs carrying the
CCNT2 3⬘-UTR sequences with mutation in the putative miR-29a
and miR-142-3p recognition elements (pCCNT2_142-3pM and
pCCNT2_29aM, respectively), and a construct with both the
mutations (pCCNT2_DM). When miR-29a or miR-142-3p mimic
was transfected into 293T cells the luciferase activity of
pCCNT2_WT was reduced by 30%. Meanwhile, single mutation
and double mutations abolished the repression by miR-29a or
miR-142-3p, demonstrating that miR-29a and miR-142-3p could
specifically target their binding sites in the 3⬘-UTRs of CCNT2
(Figure 2B). Interestingly, transfection with both microRNAs
miR-29a AND miR-142-3p AND MYELOID DIFFERENTIATION
4995
simultaneously reduced the reporter luciferase activity more significantly, and this reduction could be abolished by mutations of the
both sites, indicating that miR-29a and miR-142-3p function
independently in targeting the CCNT2 3⬘-UTR (Figure 2C).
To validate that CCNT2 is a real target of both miR-29a and
miR-142-3p, we quantified the expression of the 2 CCNT2 protein
isoforms, CCNT2b and CCNT2a, in the cells by Western blotting.
A significant reduction of endogenous CCNT2 protein levels was
detected in the cells transfected with miR-29a or miR-142-3p
mimic (Figure 2D). Inversely, CCNT2 proteins increased as a result
of miR-29a or miR-142-3p inhibitor transfection in THP-1 cells
(Figure 2E). Noticeably, the CCNT2b protein expression appears to
be more sensitive to the expression changes of miR-29a and
miR-142-3p than CCNT2a protein.
CCNT2 counteracts monocytic differentiation of PMA-induced
HL-60 and THP-1 cells
We then examined whether the function of CCNT2 is linked to
myeloid differentiation. By Western blot analysis, we found that the
CCNT2 proteins, which are highly expressed in untreated THP-1
cells, were rapidly down-regulated on PMA treatment; meanwhile,
this down-regulation was gradual in PMA-induced HL-60 cells
(Figure 2F). On the contrary, CCNT2 protein levels are almost
unchanged during ATRA-induced NB4 cell differentiation (data
not shown).
We also examined the effect of CCNT2 expression levels on
monocytic differentiation. Transfection of HL-60 and THP-1 cells
with siRNAs targeting CCNT2 mRNA (si_CCNT2) resulted in a
significant decrease of endogenous protein levels (Figure 2G). In
the presence of PMA, this resulted in a strong increase in the levels
of both CD11b and CD14 surface antigens compared with the cells
transfected with a nontargeting si_control, as judged by flow
cytometry analysis (Figure 2H; supplemental Figure 4A). In both
HL-60 and THP-1 cells, the down-regulation of CCNT2 also
resulted in increased mRNA levels of CD11b, CD14, and the
monocyte terminal differentiation marker CSF1R (M-CSFr; supplemental Figure 4B-C). Morphologic analysis using May-GrünwaldGiemsa staining and a cell adherence assay showed that si_CCNT2
transfection increased the adherence ability of PMA-induced
THP-1 cells greatly, indicating that more macrophage cells were
generated (supplemental Figure 4D-E).
CCNT2 inhibits the monocytic differentiation of HL-60 and
THP-1 cells by increasing proliferation
CCNT2 is a component of positive transcription elongation factor b
(P-TEFb), a complex that is composed of cyclin-dependent kinase
9 and a cyclin T (CDK9/CCNT). CDK9 activation requires binding
of a T family cyclin (CCNT1, CCNT2a, or CCNT2b) or CCNK.25-27
CCNT2 was not previously reported to be involved in myeloid
differentiation. We performed a proliferation assay on THP-1 cells.
PMA induced the cells to differentiation, but an obvious reduction
of cell amplification was observed in the cells transfected with
CCNT2 siRNA compared with the control cells (Figure 2I); a similar
reduction in proliferation was not observed in uninduced cells.
Previous studies demonstrated that CDK9 is able to phosphorylate p56/Rb in vitro,26 and CDK9/CCNT2 can bind to Rb and
phosphorylate the Rb region spanning amino acids 793 to 834
in vivo.27 To confirm this interaction between CCNT2 and Rb in
THP-1 and HL-60 cells, we detected phosphorylated Rb (pRb) by
Western blot analysis. A decreased pRb level was detected in the
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
4996
WANG et al
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
Figure 2. CCNT2 is a target gene of both miR-29a and miR-142-3p, and CCNT2 plays a role in inhibiting PMA-induced monocytic differentiation in THP-1 and HL-60 cells.
(A) The nucleotide sequences of miR-29a, miR-142-3p, and their complementary sequences in CCNT2 mRNA. The predicted miR-29a and miR-142-3p binding sites in the CCNT2
3⬘-UTR and the mutated nucleotides (gray boxes) of the 3⬘-UTR site are shown. CCNT2_WT is a reporter construct containing the entire wild-type 3⬘-UTR sequence of CCNT2.
CCNT2_29aM, CCNT2_142-3pM, and CCNT2_DM are reporter constructs containing mutations in the miR-29a binding site, the miR-142-3p binding site mutation, and both sites.
(B) Luciferase activity in 293T cells cotransfected with one of the 4 reporter constructs and either one of the miRNA (miR-29a or miR-142-3p) mimics or scramble control, as indicated. The
reporter constructs with perfect complementary sites for miR-29a and miR-142-3p (p29a_site and p142-3p site, respectively) were used as positive controls. The activities were calculated
as a ratio of firefly to renilla luciferase activity, and are expressed as mean ⫾ SD of 3 separate experiments. *P ⬍ .05 (Student t test). **P ⬍ .01 (Student t test). (C) Luciferase activity in
293T cells cotransfected with either the wild-type or double mutant, and both miR-29a and miR-142-3p mimics simultaneously or scramble control. (D) Western blot analysis of CCNT2
expression in 293T and myeloid cell lines THP-1, HL-60, and NB4 transfected with miR-29a mimic, miR-142-3p mimic, or scramble control. Densitometric values normalized on the basis of
GAPDH expression are indicated below the corresponding lanes and shown as fold changes. N.D indicates a densitometric value cannot be given because the band is almost
undetectable. (E) Western blot analysis of CCNT2 expression in monocytic cell line THP-1 transfected with an inhibitor for miR-29a (anti-29a), an inhibitor for miR-142-3p (anti–142-3p), or
an inhibitor control. (F) Western blot analysis showing expression of the 2 CCNT2 isoforms during PMA-induced monocytic differentiation in THP-1 and HL-60 cells; GAPDH was detected
for checking equal protein loading. (G) Western blot analysis showing the expression of CCNT2 in HL-60 and THP-1 cells that were transfected with CCNT2 siRNA (si_CCNT2) or siRNA
control (si_control) and subsequently treated with PMA for 72 hours. (H) Flow cytometric analysis of CD11b in THP-1 cells transfected with si_CCNT2 or si_control. Numbers in the graphs
represent the percentages of positively stained after 72 hours of differentiation (the right peak) compared with untreated cells (the left peak). A representative experiment of 3 is presented.
(I) Cell proliferation assay of THP-1 cells transfected with si_CCNT2 or si_control using cell counting kit 8. The cells were cultured in medium with or without PMA. (J) Western blots showing
pRb and Rb protein levels in THP-1 cells after transfection with si_CCNT2 or si_control, and in HL-60 cells after transfection with miR-29a mimic, miR-142-3p mimic, or scramble control.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
miR-29a AND miR-142-3p AND MYELOID DIFFERENTIATION
4997
Figure 3. Validation of CDK6 and TAB2 as target
genes for miR-29a and miR-142-3p, respectively.
(A) The predicted miR-29a binding sites in the 3⬘-UTR of
CDK6 mRNA are shown. CDK6_WT is the pMIRREPORT construct containing the entire 3⬘-UTR sequence of CDK. CDK6_MUT1, MUT2, and DM are the
pMIR-REPORT constructs containing mutated nucleotides in the first, second, and both miR-29a binding sites,
respectively. (B) Luciferase reporter assays. Relative
luciferase levels in 293T cells cotransfected with the
CDK6_WT, CDK6_MUT1/2, or CDK6_DM report construct and either miR-29a mimic or scrambled control.
*P ⬍ .05 (Student t test). **P ⬍ .01 (Student t test).
(C) Western blot analysis of CDK6 levels in 293T, THP-1,
and NB4 cells. miR-29a mimic, inhibitor (anti-29a), or a
control was transfected into the indicated cells. A representative Western blot from 3 independent experiments
is shown. (D) The predicted miR-142-3p binding site in
the 3⬘-UTR of TAB2 mRNA is shown. TAB2_WT is the
reporter construct containing the entire 3⬘-UTR sequence
of TAB2, and TAB2_MUT is the reporter construct containing mutated nucleotides at the miR-142-3p binding site.
The mutated nucleotides of the 3⬘-UTR site are indicated
by gray boxes. (E) Relative luciferase expression levels
in 293T cells cotransfected with TAB2_WT or TAB2_MUT
with either miR-142-3p mimic or a scrambled control.
(F) Western blot analysis of TAB2 levels in 293T, THP-1,
and NB4 cells. miR-142-3p mimic, a miR-142-3p inhibitor
(anti–142-3p), or a control was transfected into the
indicated cells. A representative Western blot from 3 independent experiments is shown.
cells transfected with CCNT2 siRNA compared with the cells
transfected with the control, whereas the level of total Rb remained
consistent (Figure 2J top), which is consistent with the observation
that the ectopic expression of both miRNAs decreased the pRb
level (Figure 2J bottom). Given that Rb is well known for its
involvement in mediating the cell cycle, we examined intracellular
DNA content using flow cytometry and failed to see any obvious
G1 arrest induced by si_CCNT2 in the uninduced cells. However,
after PMA treatment for 24 hours, a significantly increased
percentage of cells in G1 was detected among these cells transfected with si_CCNT2 compared with the cells transfected with
si_control (supplemental Figure 5).
These results demonstrated that the CCNT2 down-regulation and
the resulting decrease in pRb levels and cell proliferation are one of the
pathways by which miR-29a and miR-142-3p promote monocytopoiesis.
Validation of CDK6 as a target of miR-29a in THP-1 and NB4
cells
CDK6 was previously reported as a target of miR-29a in mantle cell
lymphoma, in which CDK6, expressed at elevated levels, cooperates with cyclin D1 to further promote cell cycle progression.28 We
thus hypothesized that CDK6 may also function as a target of
miR-29a in promyelocytic cell lines. We constructed 4 pMIR-
REPORT constructs that contained either the wild-type sequence of
CDK6 3⬘-UTR (pCDK6_WT) or the sequences of the 3⬘-UTR with
mutation in the first (pCDK6_MUT1), or second binding site
(pCDK6_MUT2) or in both (pCDK6_DM; Figure 3A). As expected, miR-29a mimic transfection decreased the activity of the
pCDK6_WT reporter markedly, with little effect on the activity of
pCDK6_MUT1 or pCDK6_MUT2 reporters and no effect on the
activity of the CDK6_DM reporter (Figure 3B). miR-29a mimic
transfection also obviously decreased the CDK6 protein levels in
293T, THP-1, and NB4 cells (Figure 3C top), whereas knockdown
of miR-29a by inhibitor transfection resulted in increased CDK6
levels in NB4 and THP-1 cells (Figure 3C bottom). These results
demonstrated CDK6 is a direct target of miR-29a in these cell lines.
TAB2 was identified as a target of miR-142-3p in THP-1 and
NB4 cells
We also constructed 2 pMIR-REPORT constructs containing either the
wild-type sequence of the TAB2 3⬘-UTR (pTAB2_WT) or a sequence
with a mutation in the miR-142-3p binding site (pTAB2_MUT; Figure
3D). Significantly reduced luciferase activity was detected in the cells
cotransfected with the pTAB2_WT and miR-142-3p mimics but not in
the cells cotransfected with the pTAB2_MUT and miR-142-3p mimics
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
4998
WANG et al
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
Figure 4. Expression inhibition of CDK6 and TAB2 increases ATRA-induced differentiation in NB4 cells and PMA-induced differentiation in THP-1 cells. (A) THP-1
cells treated with 50 ng/mL PMA (left) and NB4 cells treated with 2␮M ATRA (right) were collected at the indicated time points for Western blot analysis of TAB2 and CDK6
protein levels. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (B) THP-1 and NB4 cells were transiently transfected with control siRNA (si_control), TAB2 siRNA (si_TAB2), or CDK6
siRNA (si_CDK6). A representative Western blot detecting TAB2 and CDK6 is shown. (C) Real-time PCR analysis of the CD11b mRNA level in the transfected NB4 cells after
ATRA induction, and real-time PCR analysis of the CD14 mRNA level in the transfected THP-1 cells after PMA induction. Error bars represent mean ⫾ SD (n ⫽ 3). (D) Flow
cytometric analysis of CD11b levels. The cells were transfected with the indicated inhibitors and then treated for 72 hours with ATRA (for NB4 cells) or PMA (for THP-1 cells).
A representative experiment of 3 is presented. (E) Statistical analysis of the flow cytometric assays. Data are mean ⫾ SD from 3 independent experiments. *P ⬍ .05 (Student
t test). **P ⬍ .01 (Student t test).
(Figure 3E). Western blot analysis indicated that transfection of miR142-3p mimic reduced the TAB2 level in the transfected cells (Figure 3F
top), whereas knockdown of miR-142-3p by inhibitor transfection
increased TAB2 level (Figure 3F bottom). Taken collectively, these data
indicated that TAB2 is a direct target of miR-142-3p.
Effects of CDK6 and TAB2 on granulocytic and monocytic
differentiation
By Western blot analysis, we observed gradually decreased
levels of both TAB2 and CDK6 proteins during the ATRAinduced granulocytic differentiation of NB4 and the PMAinduced monocytic differentiation of THP-1. The decrease in
TAB2 levels appeared to be more rapid than that of CDK6
(Figure 4A). To further elucidate the roles of TAB2 and CDK6
in myeloid differentiation, we transfected NB4 and THP-1 cells
with TAB2-siRNA (si_TAB2), CDK6-siRNA (si_CDK6), or
nontargeting siRNA (si_control). The decrease of CDK6 and
TAB2 protein levels via RNA interference was confirmed by
Western blot (Figure 4B). The suppressed expression of TAB2
or CDK6 promoted both the PMA-induced monocytic differentiation and ATRA-induced granulocytic differentiation, as evaluated by the up-regulation of CD11b and CD14 mRNA expres-
sion (Figure 4C), morphologic changes (supplemental Figure 6),
and the CD11b antigens levels (Figure 4D-E).
Expression inhibition of the target genes partially rescues the
anti–miR-29a– and anti–miR-142-3p–mediated myeloid
differentiation block
To test whether the regulation of myeloid differentiation by
miR-29a and miR-142-3p is mediated via the targets identified
in the preceding 5 paragraphs, NB4 and THP-1 cells were
transfected with either CCNT2 or CDK6 siRNA after anti–miR29a transfection, or with CCNT2 or TAB2 siRNA after anti–miR142-3p transfection. As shown in supplemental Figure 7A,
transfection of the target siRNAs repressed the up-regulation of
target expression that should have been induced by anti–miR29a or anti–miR-142-3p transfection. Flow cytometric analysis
showed that the expression up-regulation of myeloid differentiation markers was partially rescued by knocking down the target
genes (supplemental Figure 7B). These data further demonstrate
that miR-29a and miR-142-3p promote myeloid differentiation
via directly targeting their common target CCNT2 and individual targets, CDK6 and TAB2, respectively.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
Role of miR-29a, miR-142-3p, and their targets in the normal
hematopoiesis
To study the role of miR-29a and miR-142-3p in the normal
hematopoietic program, we analyzed their levels in monocyte/
macrophage and granulocytic induction cultures of UCB CD34⫹
HSPCs. Figure 5A shows a gradual increase of miR-29a and
miR-142-3p during the induction cultures.
The role of miR-29a and miR-142-3p in the myeloid
differentiation was validated by ectopic expression of them in
induction cultures. Overexpression of the miRNAs was accomplished by infecting CD34⫹ cells with Lenti-29a or Lenti-142.
After 4 days of viral infection, the miR-142-3p level reached
1.9-fold in Lenti-142–infected cells and the miR-29a level
reached 2-fold in Lenti-29a–infected cells compared with
Lenti-control–infected cells, and this overexpression persisted
until the differentiation cultures were terminated. The differentiation status of cells was evaluated by morphologic analysis,
colony-forming assay, and real-time PCR analysis, particularly
for the appearance and rising expression of monocytic/
macrophage (CD11b and CD14) and granulocytic (CD11b and
CSF3R) differentiation markers. Compared with the cells infected with the Lenti-control, overexpression of either miR-29a
or miR-142-3p resulted in an increased expression of differentiation markers that began 7 days after induction (Figure 5B;
supplemental Figure 8A). Colony-forming assay showed that
both miR-29a and miR-142 promote the forming of CFU-GM,
CFU-G, and CFU-M, increasing both clone number and size
(Figure 5C). Giemsa staining also confirmed an increased
percentage of more mature cells in the monocytic and granulocytic induction cultures of CD34⫹ cells infected with either
Lenti-29a or Lenti-142 compared with the control cultures
(Figure 5D-E; supplemental Figure 8B).
Western blot analysis showed the levels of the 3 miRNA
target proteins decrease beginning on day 7 after differentiation
induction (Figure 6A-B). To prove the interaction of the
miRNAs and their targets in the differentiating cells, the target
protein levels in the induction cultures were analyzed. Decreased CCNT2 levels were detected in the monocytic induction
cultures of CD34⫹ cells infected with either Lenti-29a or
Lenti-142 compared with the cells infected with Lenti-control
(Figure 6C). Decreased CDK6 and TAB2 levels were also
detected in the monocytic and granulocytic induction cultures of
CD34⫹ cells infected with Lenti-29a and Lenti-142, respectively, compared with control cells (Figure 6D-E).
It should be noted that the precursor of miR-142 can be
processed into 2 mature miRNAs: miR-142-3p and miR-142-5p.29
By real-time PCR analysis, we found that the expression level of
miR-142-5p was always much lower than that of miR-142-3p
during the monocytic and granulocytic differentiation of CD34⫹
cells (supplemental Figure 9). An increased expression of miR-1423p, but not of miR-142-5p, was detected in the induction cultures
infected with Lenti-142 compared with the controls. These suggested that the promotion of myeloid differentiation effected by the
lentivirus-mediated gene transfer primarily reflected the action of
miR-142-3p.
Validation that miR-29a and miR-142-3p negatively regulate the
target genes in AML PBMNCs
We previously demonstrated significantly decreased expression of
miR-29a and miR-142-3p in PBMNCs by comparing 100 normal
subjects and 52 primary diagnosed AML patients.9 To validate that
these miRNAs regulate their identified targets in AML, we recently
miR-29a AND miR-142-3p AND MYELOID DIFFERENTIATION
4999
collected PBMNCs from 30 healthy donors and 20 primary
diagnosed AML patients (supplemental Table 1). Again, we
observed that expression of the 2 miRNAs significantly decreased
in AML patients (supplemental Figure 10A). Western blot analysis
revealed that levels of the target proteins CCNT2, CDK6, and
TAB2 were, to a great extent, inversely correlated with miR-29a and
miR-142-3p expression in the samples (supplemental Figure 10B).
Enforced expression of miR-29a or miR-142-3p in AML BM
blasts improved myeloid differentiation
We expanded our analysis to BM CD34⫹ cells derived from partial
projects and observed significantly decreased miR-29a and miR142-3p expression in the AML patients compared with healthy
donors (Figure 7A). We also stochastically selected BM CD34⫹
cells derived from an AML M5 patient (patient 12) and an M3b
patient (patient 4; supplemental Table 1) to examine their expression levels after myeloid differentiation induction. Up-regulation
of the 2 miRNAs during granulocytic and monocytic induction
cultures was detected (supplemental Figure 11), but the ratios of
expression increase were much less than that in the normal CD34⫹
cells (Figure 5A).
To test whether ectopic expression of the miRNAs could
promote myeloid maturation of AML BM blasts, we infected BM
CD34⫹ cells derived from 3 AML patients with the recombination
viruses. Using flow cytometry, we observed that the ectopic
expression of miR-29a or miR-142-3p partially overcame differentiation arrest in AML blasts (Figure 7B-E). Western blot analysis
further confirmed that the ectopic expression of miR-29a or
miR-142-3p decreased their target protein levels (Figure 7F).
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated a positive regulation of miR-29a and
miR-142-3p on the monocytic and granulocytic differentiations
and validated their 3 targets. In addition, we showed that abnormal
expression of these 2 miRNAs and the 3 identified targets is
involved in AML development.
Expression signature of miR-142-3p had been previously
implicated in hematopoietic differentiation of AML cells, but some
contradict results were reported, which may be resulted from the
differences in cell induction and RNA isolation methods.13,29-31 The
miR-142-3p expression was reported to increase by 2.5-fold after
2 weeks of granulocytic differentiation in UCB-derived CD34⫹
cells.13 A study compared miRNA expression among HSPCs and
peripheral blood leukocytes also identified miR-142-3p as the most
up-regulated miRNA in peripheral blood leukocytes.30 Meanwhile,
previous reports regarding miR-29a did not demonstrate its involvement in myeloid differentiation but focused on its abnormal
expression in many kinds of leukemia.32 Moreover, we previously
detected a significantly decreased expression of miR-29a and
miR-142-3p in the PBMNCs of AML patients,9 and confirmed the
result in AML BM blast cells in the current study.
We confirmed CCNT2 as a common target of miR-29a and
miR-142-3p. CCNT2 is a component of the positive transcription
elongation factor b (P-TEFb).33 In mammals, P-TEFb is essential
for the elongation of transcription and cotranscriptional processing
by RNA polymerase II, and different P-TEFb complexes can
regulate subsets of distinct genes that are important for embryonic
development.34
We observed inhibition of proliferation in THP-1 cells and a
decreased level of phosphorylated Rb by siRNA-mediated knockdown of CCNT2, which is consistent with previous findings.27 We
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
5000
WANG et al
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
Figure 5. Role of miR-29a and miR-142-3p in CD34ⴙ HSPCs derived from UCB. CD34⫹ cells purified from human UCB samples were infected with Lenti-control, Lenti-29a, or
Lenti-142. Cells were cultured for 17 days. Granulocytic differentiation was induced by human G-CSF (20 ng/mL) and rhIL-6 (10 ng/mL), and monocytic differentiation by rhM-SCF
(50 ng/mL), rhIL-6 (1 ng/mL), and rhFlt-3L (100 ng/mL). Cells were collected for morphologic, colony formation, and myeloid marker expression analysis. (A) Real-time PCR analysis of
miR-29a and miR-142-3p expression during differentiation. Samples were collected at the indicated days after induction. The relative expression of miR-142-3p and miR-29a was
normalized to the expression level at day 0. (B) CD14 mRNA levels for monocytic differentiation and CD11b mRNA levels for granulocytic differentiation were analyzed by real-time PCR.
(C) Colony formation assay after an 11-day colony formation period. A total of 1 ⫻ 104 of infected CD34⫹ cells were plated in complete methylcellulose medium without erythropoietin. The
arrows indicate typical CFU-GM (colony-forming unit-granulocyte/macrophage), CFU-G (colony-forming unit-granulocyte), and CFU-M (colony-forming unit-macrophage; left).
Quantification of formation of blood colonies was shown (right). Images were captured with microscopy Nikon eclipse TS100 using 10⫻ phase-contrast objective with numeric aperture
0.3 and acquired through CCD DS-Qi1 camera and NIS-Elements F Version 3.0 software (Nikon) at room temperature. (D) Changes in the morphology of May-Grünwald-Giemsa–stained
CD34⫹ cells infected with the viruses at day 13 of the differentiation culture. Images were captured at room temperature with Olympus BX51 microscope using 20⫻ with numeric aperture
0.5. (E) The number of cells in various differentiation stages. In total, 100 cells were counted per sample. The averages from 2 independent experiments are shown. MB indicates
myeloblasts; PM, promyelocytes; MM, metamyelocytes; Band and Seg, band neutrophils and segmented neutrophils for granulocytic differentiation; Mob, monoblasts; PMo,
promonocytes; Mo, monocytes; and Ma, macrophage for monocytic differentiation.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
miR-29a AND miR-142-3p AND MYELOID DIFFERENTIATION
5001
Figure 6. CDK6, TAB2, and CCNT2 expression levels
in monocytic and granulocytic induction cultures of
CD34ⴙ cells. (A-B) Western blot analysis of CDK6,
TAB2, and CCNT2 in extracts from monocytic (A) and
granulocytic (B) induction cultures at the indicated times.
Whole cell extracts were incubated with anti-CDK6,
TAB2, or CCNT2 antibodies. (C) CCNT2 protein expression was detected by Western blot analysis at day 4, 9,
and 11 of monocytic induction cultures of CD34⫹ cells
infected with Lenti-29a, Lenti-142, or Lenti-control.
(D) CDK6 protein expression was detected by Western
blot analysis at day 4, 9, and 11 of monocytic and
granulocytic induction cultures of CD34⫹ cells infected
with Lenti-29a or Lenti-control. (E) TAB2 protein expression was detected by Western blot analysis at day 4, 9,
and 11 of monocytic and granulocytic induction cultures
of CD34⫹ cells infected with Lenti-142 or Lenti-control.
For the Western blots shown in this figure, GAPDH
antibody was used to assess equal protein loading. The
signal in each lane was quantified using Gelpro software,
and the ratio of CCNT2, CDK6, and TAB2 to GAPDH was
determined. Because the CD34⫹ cells are a mixture
containing various HPCs and the sample amount was
limited, the 0-day samples was not included in the
Western blot analysis.
also showed that the ectopic expression of miR-29a or miR-142-3p
could decrease pRb level, which might be a consequence of the
reduction of CCNT2 expression.
Previous studies showed that the monocytic differentiation of
BM cells is correlated to high levels of pRb, whereas during
neutrophilic differentiation, pRb levels are low.35 It has been
demonstrated that the importance of Rb phosphorylation in different pathways other than the cell cycle.36 In contrary, mechanistic
studies of the response of THP-1 cells to PMA treatment showed
that high levels of pRb are indispensible, and growth arrest at the
G1 phase of the cell cycle is involved.37 Thus, reduced levels of pRb
are indispensible for the monocytic differentiation of both promyeloid cell lines and BM HSPCs, whether G1 phase arrest is induced
or not. This also accounts for our observation that the CCNT2
protein levels decreased only during monocytic induction cultures but
remained almost unchanged during granulocytic induction cultures.
We validated CDK6 as another target of miR-29a during
myeloid differentiation. In vitro, CDK6 levels rapidly decrease
after the onset of terminal granulocytic differentiation in 32Dcl3
cells.38 In vivo, loss of CDK6 in the mouse affected the production
of terminally differentiated myeloid and erythroid cells.39 It is clear
that CDK6 blocks myeloid differentiation by interfering with
Runx1⬘ ability to bind DNA and with Runx1-C/EBP␣ interaction
in immature proliferating cells.40 Down-regulation of CDK6 therefore provides a molecular switch that allows the differentiationpromoting activity of Runx proteins to be selectively activated in
terminally differentiating cells.
We also identified TAB2 as another target of miR-142-3p. TAB2
has been shown to play a role in vitro as an adapter protein in the
receptor proximal signaling events of the proinflammatory IL-1
and of several TNF-family members, including RANKL, to
activate the NF-␬B pathway via binding to ubiquitinated TRAF2
and TRAF6 in the cytoplasm.41-43 In this way, RANKL stimulates
osteoclast differentiation from hematopoietic precursor cells. We
propose that the up-regulation of miR-142-3p blocks TAB2 expression, which results in inhibition of osteoclast development, and as a
consequence, drives monocytic precursors to differentiate into
mature macrophages. This miRNA-based mechanism underlying
the commitment of monocyte progenitors to a single-cell fate was also
observed by Mann et al.44 They demonstrated that miR-155 drives the
commitment of monocyte progenitors toward activated macrophages by
interfering with the expression of MITF, which propels the same
progenitors toward osteoclast differentiation.44 In the current study, we
found that knockdown of TAB2 also induced granulocytic differentiation in NB4 cells on ATRA treatment. Future studies are needed
to explain the mechanism underlying this regulation of TAB2.
Because miR-29a and miR-142-3p have many proven and
potential targets, we could have expected to find that their function
in promoting myeloid differentiation is implemented by various
targets. However, given the pro-myelopoiesis effects of CCNT2,
CDK6, and TAB2 siRNA transfection in the current study, and that
the expression of these proteins in the CCNT2, CDK6, and TAB2
knockdown assays can be rescued by anti–miR-29a or anti–miR142-3p transfection, it is therefore conceivable that miR-29a and
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
5002
WANG et al
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
Figure 7. Expression of miR-29a and miR-142-3p in AML BM blasts and their function in promoting myelopoiesis. (A) Expression levels of miR-29a and miR-142-3p were
determined by real-time PCR analysis of BM CD34⫹ cells from AML patients and healthy donors using TaqMan probes. The differences were shown to be significant by one-tailed unpaired
Mann-Whitney U nonparametric t test analysis. (B-E) BM CD34⫹ cells from 3AML patients (patients 11, 5, and 6 were diagnosed as French-American-British M5, M2, and M4, respectively;
all demonstrated low expression levels of miR-29a and miR-142-3p; supplemental Table 1) were infected with Lenti-miR-29a, Lenti-miR-142-3p, or Lenti-control. After infection for
24 hours, the cells were cultured in monocytic or granulocytic induction medium for the indicated number of days, after which the cells were collected and the GFP-positive cells were
analyzed for myeloid marker expression. The expression levels of CD14 (B) and CD11b (C) in lentivirus-infected blast cells (#11 and #5 of supplemental Table 1) were analyzed by FACS
analysis compared with their expression levels in CD34⫹ BM cells from normal donors (N13 and N12). Red histogram represents unstained CD34⫹ cells; and black histogram, cells
induced for the indicated number of days. The monocytic (D) and granulocytic (E) differentiation of CD34⫹ cells from AML patient 6 were determined by FACS analysis. (F) Western blot
analysis of the target proteins, CCNT2, CDK6, and TAB2. The protein extracts were obtained from the cells at day 6 of granulocytic and monocytic induction cultures of BM CD34⫹ cells
derived from AML 6, and infected with Lenti-29a, Lenti-142-3p, or Lenti-control. GAPDH was detected as the loading control.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
miR-29a AND miR-142-3p AND MYELOID DIFFERENTIATION
miR-142-3p promote myeloid differentiation primarily by affecting
these 3 targets. Moreover, significantly increased levels of the
target proteins were detected in the AML blasts with abnormally
reduced expression of miR-29a and miR-142-3p, which further
suggested that the 2 miRNAs regulate myeloid differentiation and
AML development via the 3 target genes.
Collectively, our data demonstrated that miR-29a and miR142-3p play a key role in promoting granulopoiesis and monopoiesis, and the abnormally decreased expression of these 2 miRNAs
is responsible for the differentiation block of blast cells in some
AML patients, whereas enforced expression of either miR-29a or
miR-142-3p could improve the differentiation status. Because we
have observed the universal down-regulation of these 2 miRNAs in
AML M1 to M5 subtypes, increasing endogenous expression or
ectopic implantation of miR-29a and miR-142-3p may be a
potential strategy for AML treatment.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr Shao-Wei Wang from Beijing Hospital for
assistance in UCB collection.
5003
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (30970616 and 31171311; J.-W.Z.) and the
Specific Fund of National Laboratory of China (3060204; J.-W.Z.).
Authorship
Contribution: X.-S.W. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper; J.-N.G. performed experiments
and analyzed data; J.Y., F.W., G.-H.Y., and C.S. performed
experiments; X.-H. Z., X.-L.Y., Z.-Q.T., and Z.-M.L. provided the
experimental materials of AML patients and healthy donors; and
J.-W.Z. designed the research, analyzed data and wrote the paper.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Jun-Wu Zhang, National Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences,
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical
College, 5 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing 100005, China; e-mail:
[email protected].
References
1. Fröhling S, Scholl C, Gilliland DG, Levine RL. Genetics of myeloid malignancies: pathogenetic and
clinical implications. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:62856295.
2. Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD. The
World Health Organization (WHO) classification
of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2002;100(7):
2292-2302.
3. Metcalf D. Hematopoietic cytokines. Blood. 2008;
111(2):485-491.
4. Friedman AD. Transcriptional control of granulocyte and monocyte development. Oncogene.
2007;26(47):6816-6828.
5. Auffray C, Sieweke MH, Geissmann F. Blood
monocytes: development, heterogeneity, and relationship with dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol.
2009;27:669-692.
6. Bhana N. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors
in the management of chemotherapy-induced
neutropenia: evidence based review. Curr Opin
Oncol. 2007;19(4):328-335.
7. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis,
mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281297.
8. Monticelli S, ed. MicroRNAs and the immune
system: methods and protocols. Walker JM,
ed. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 667.
Lausanne, Switzerland: Humana Press; 2010.
9. Wang F, Wang XS, Yang GH, et al. Down-regulation of miR-29a and miR-142-3p and their diagnostic implication in human acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(3):2713-2722.
10. Garzon R, Volinia S, Liu CG, et al. MicroRNA signatures associated with cytogenetics and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2008;
111(6):3183-3189.
11. Marcucci G, Mrózek K, Radmacher MD, Garzon
R, Bloomfield CD. The prognostic and functional
role of microRNAs in acute myeloid leukemia.
Blood. 2011;117(4):1121-1129.
12. Bellon M, Lepelletier Y, Hermine O, Nicot C.
Deregulation of microRNA involved in hematopoiesis and the immune response in HTLV-I
adult T-cell leukemia. Blood. 2009;113(20):
4914-4917.
stricts cAMP production in CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells
and CD4⫹CD25⫹ TREG cells by targeting AC9
mRNA. EMBO Rep. 2009;10(2):180-185.
15. Bissels U, Wild S, Tomiuk S, et al. Combined
characterization of microRNA and mRNA profiles
delineates early differentiation pathways of
CD133⫹ and CD34⫹ hematopoietic stem and
progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2011;29(5):847-857.
16. Sun Y, Varambally S, Maher CA, et al. Targeting
of microRNA-142-3p in dendritic cells regulates
endotoxin induced mortality. Blood. 2011;117(23):
6172-6183.
17. Wu L, Cai C, Wang X, Liu M, Li X, Tang H. MicroRNA-142-3p, a new regulator of RAC1, suppresses the migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(9):
1322-1330.
18. Lanotte M, Martin-Thouvenin V, Najman S,
Balerini P, Valensi F, Berger R. NB4, a maturation
inducible cell line with t(15;17) marker isolated
from a human acute promyelocytic leukemia
(M3). Blood. 1991;77(5):1080-1086.
19. Melnick A, Licht JD. Deconstructing a disease:
RAR alpha, its fusion partners, and their roles in
the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 1999;93(10):3167-3215.
20. Tsuchiya S, Yamabe M, Yamaguchi Y,
Kobayashi Y, Konno T, Tada K. Establishment
and characterization of a human acute monocytic leukemia cell line (THP-1). Int J Cancer.
1980;26(2):171-176.
21. Pierce A, Heyworth CM, Nicholls SE, et al. An
activated protein kinase C alpha gives a differentiation signal for hematopoietic progenitor cells
and mimicks macrophage colony-stimulating factors-stimulated signaling events. J Cell Biol.
1998;140(6):1511-1518.
22. Breitman TR, Sclonick SE, Collins SJ. Induction
of differentiation of the human promyelocytic
leukemia cell line (HL-60) by retinoic acid. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77(5):2936-2940.
23. Huberman E, Callaham MF. Induction of terminal
differentiation in human promyelocytic leukemia
cells by tumor-promoting agents. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 1979;76(3):1293-1297.
13. Careccia S, Mainardi S, Pelosi A, et al. A restricted signature of miRNAs distinguishes APL
blasts from normal promyelocytes. Oncogene.
2009;28(45):4034-4040.
24. Yang GH, Wang F, Yu J, Wang XS, Yuan JY,
Zhang JW. MicroRNAs are involved in erythroid
differentiation control. J Cell Biochem. 2009;107:
548-556.
14. Huang B, Zhao J, Lei Z, et al. miR-142-3p re-
25. de Falco G, Giordano A. CDK9 (PITALRE): a mul-
tifunctional cdc2-related kinase. J Cell Physiol.
1998;177(4):501-506.
26. De Luca A, Esposito V, Baldi A, et al. CDC2-related kinase PITALRE phosphorylates pRb exclusively on serine and is widely expressed in human tissues. J Cell Physiol. 1997;172(2):265273.
27. Simone C, Bagella L, Bellan C, Giordano A.
Physical interaction between pRb and cdk9/cyclinT2 complex. Oncogene. 2002;21(26):41584165.
28. Zhao JJ, Lin J, Lwin T, et al. microRNA expression profile and identification of miR-29 as a prognostic marker and pathogenetic factor by targeting CDK6 in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood. 2010;
115(13):2630-2639.
29. Kasashima K, Nakamura Y, Kozu T. Altered expression profiles of microRNAs during TPA-induced differentiation of HL-60 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;322(2):403-410.
30. Jin P, Wang E, Ren J, et al. Differentiation of two
types of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells by
microRNA and cDNA expression analysis.
J Transl Med. 2008;6:39.
31. Chen A, Luo MY, Yuan GH, et al. Complementary
analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression during phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (TPA)-induced differentiation of HL-60 cells. Biotechnol
Lett. 2008;30:2045-2052.
32. Han Y-C, Park CY, Bhagat G, et al. microRNA29a induces aberrant self-renewal capacity in hematopoietic progenitors, biased myeloid development, and acute myeloid leukemia. J Exp Med.
2010;207(3):475-489.
33. Wei P, Gender ME, Fang SM, Fisher WH,
Jones KA. A novel CDK9-associated C-type cyclin interacts directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates
its high-affinity, loop-specific binding to TAR RNA.
Cell. 1998;92(4):451-462.
34. Kohoutek J, Li Q, Blazek D, Luo Z, Jiang H,
Peterlin BM. Cyclin T2 is essential for mouse embryogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(12):32803285.
35. Bergh G, Ehinger M, Olsson I, Jacobsen SE,
Gullberg U. Involvement of the retinoblastoma
protein in monocytic and neutrophilic lineage
commitment of human bone marrow progenitor
cells. Blood. 1999;94(6):1971-1978.
36. Sebastian T, Malik R, Thomas S, Sage J,
Johnson PF. C/EBPbeta cooperates with RB:
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
5004
BLOOD, 24 MAY 2012 䡠 VOLUME 119, NUMBER 21
WANG et al
E2F to implement Ras(V12)-induced cellular
senescence. EMBO J. 2005;24(18):3301-3312.
37. Traore K, Trush MA, George M Jr,
Spannhake EW, Anderson W, Asseffa A. Signal
transduction of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
(PMA)-induced growth inhibition of human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cells is reactive oxygen dependent. Leuk Res. 2005;29(8):863-879.
dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6. Cell. 2004;
118(4):493-504.
40. Fujimoto T, Anderson K, Jacobsen SEW,
Nishikawa S-I, Nerlov C. Cdk6 blocks myeloid
differentiation by interfering with Runx1 DNA
binding and Runx1-C/EBPa interaction. EMBO J.
2007;26(9):2361-2370.
38. Rane SG, Mangan JK, Amanullah A, et al. Activation of the Jak3 pathway is associated with granulocytic differentiation of myeloid precursor cells.
Blood. 2002;100(8):2753-2762.
41. Morlon A, Munnich A, Munnich AS. TAB2, TRAF6
and TAK1 are involved in NF-kappaB activation
induced by the TNF-receptor, Edar and its adaptor Edaradd. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(23):37513757.
39. Malumbres M, Sotillo R, Santamaria D, et al.
Mammalian cells cycle without the D-type cyclin-
42. Takaesu G, Kishida S, Hiyama A, et al. TAB2, a
novel adaptor protein, mediates activation of
TAK1 MAPKKK by linking TAK1 to TRAF6 in the
IL-1 signal transduction pathway. Mol Cell. 2000;
5(4):649-658.
43. Mizukami J, Takaesu G, Akatsuka H, et al. Receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL)
activates TAK1 mitogen-activated protein kinase
kinase kinase through a signaling complex containing RANK, TAB2, and TRAF6. Mol Cell Biol.
2002;22(4):992-1000.
44. Mann M, Barad O, Agami R, Geiger B,
Hornstein E. miRNA-based mechanism for the
commitment of multipotent progenitors to a single
cellular fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;
107(36):15804-15809.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 17, 2017. For personal use only.
2012 119: 4992-5004
doi:10.1182/blood-2011-10-385716 originally published
online April 4, 2012
MicroRNA-29a and microRNA-142-3p are regulators of myeloid
differentiation and acute myeloid leukemia
Xiao-Shuang Wang, Jia-Nan Gong, Jia Yu, Fang Wang, Xin-Hua Zhang, Xiao-Lin Yin, Zhen-Qing
Tan, Zi-Mian Luo, Gui-Hua Yang, Chao Shen and Jun-Wu Zhang
Updated information and services can be found at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/119/21/4992.full.html
Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections
Myeloid Neoplasia (1689 articles)
Phagocytes, Granulocytes, and Myelopoiesis (616 articles)
Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests
Information about ordering reprints may be found online at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints
Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml
Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society
of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036.
Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.