Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Investment Insight November 2016 Will President Trump’s Administration be more like Reagan’s or Hoover’s? By Nancy Curtin, Chief Investment Officer at Close Brothers Asset Management As investors continue to digest the unexpected news of the Trump victory last week, they will be faced with a barrage of news to digest in the months ahead. However, it is perhaps worth stepping back and putting Trump’s declared policies into an historical context. Trump’s proposed programme of change, at least on the economic side, recalls the Ronald Reagan era. However, his protectionist stance harkens back to the 1930’s and Herbert Hoover. The two presidents had diametrically opposed impacts on growth, equity returns and employment. Like Trump; the 40th President of the United States Ronald Reagan also came to power as a non-establishment president. Many doubted the ability of the former Hollywood actor to accomplish much. He was seen as a buffoon by many and hardly fit to hold the highest office in the land. However the mood was ripe for change as Americans had been crushed by years of “stagflation” – a period of slow economic growth and high inflation throughout the late seventies. By 1979 Fed Chair Paul Volcker had begun raising interest rates in a bid to break the back of inflation, but curbing inflation came at the cost of growth and the “misery index” (the rate of unemployment plus the rate of inflation) continued to surge, reaching an all-time high in Q2 1980. The fiscal fillip Against this difficult backdrop and with the US economy slipping into recession, President Reagan came to power in January 1981 with his own form of supply side, fiscal stimulus – “Reaganomics”. The four pillars of Reagan’s economic policy were to slow the growth of government, reduce federal taxes on income and capital gains, roll back government regulation, and increase public infrastructure spending. Part of Reagan’s success in economic reform was no doubt due to his highly capable advisers, such as White House Chief of Staff James Baker and Treasury Secretary Donald Regan. His cosy relationship with Tip O’Neill in Congress was also seen as one of the great examples of a President and Congress working effectively together. While a near-miss assassination attempt two months into his presidency meant that Reagan did not sign his first bill until the end of March 1981, he was able to implement significant reforms that same year. As early as February 1981, he had sent to Congress significant revisions of budget and tax policy. Through the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, Reagan began the series of across-the-board tax cuts and increases in public spending that were to be the cornerstone of his government. Like Trump, Reagan also set out to increase defence spending. Defence spending rose from 4.9% to 5.8% of GDP. In most of the Reagan years, military spending was about 6% of GDP. During Reagan’s first term, real GDP growth soared to over 7% year on year following the 1982 recession, before slowing to a robust average of 4% for the remainder of his term. While the government deficit tripled to nearly 6.0% of GDP (unheard of at that time), real GDP per working-age adult increased by 14% during the Reagan administration. The increase in nominal productivity growth was even higher: output per hour, which had been roughly constant in the Carter years, increased at 10% per annum in the Reagan years. Employment and labour participation rates also dramatically increased. Market participants are no doubt wishing that Trump will implement fiscal stimulus with equal success. The chart overleaf shows GDP growth before and during the Reagan era in grey, alongside GDP growth between 2011and 2016 in blue. While the US economy is not currently suffering from “stagflation”, growth in recent years has been anaemic, and has trended down over recent quarters. An effective loosening of fiscal policy could sustain a longer recovery. US GDP growth – Reagan era vs. today Source: DataStream, CBAM. The Reagan bull market Unsurprisingly, the Reagan regime’s fiscal package, combined with controlled inflation, ushered in one of the greatest bull markets of that time. The era effectively created a sea change in growth and earnings expectations and the markets loved it. On 12 August 1982, the US index closed at a low of just 776.92. Before the end of that year, the index had surged past 1000, and by 1987 it peaked at 2722.42, a 3.5x increase in share prices. Could something similar happen again? The chart below superimposes the Reagan years (in grey) on current stock market trends (in blue). Before Reagan much wealth had been concentrated in the hands of the few. Policies got money in the hands of people with a greater propensity to spend than save, as well as encouraging broader stock market participation. Soaring returns on the stock market increased consumer confidence and generated unprecedented wealth, in turn supporting the economy. US Equity Index Source: Bloomberg. Some pundits believe that Trump will be a staunch advocate of change, that he will be keen to keep the recovery going and, in so doing, avoid a recession ahead of the next election in 2020. A protectionism prototype While fiscal stimulus will be welcomed by investors, concerns linger over Trump’s other electoral promises. Putting aside social issues, the largest threat to economic growth could well be his promise to “put America first” through controlling imports. Historically, such policies have not been successful and a similar policy led to a deepening of the 1930 US depression. Herbert Hoover, the 31st President of the US, had tried to combat the downturn not only with large-scale government public works (projects such as the Hoover Dam) but also measures designed to protect American workers. The latter did not work so well. The Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods. Hoover’s aim to make imports so expensive that Americans would buy only American-made products severely backfired. Foreign trading partners retaliated with similar measures and American trade fell by over 70% while world trade halved. Hoover was credited with accelerating the depths of the Great Depression, served only one term as a Republican and lost the 1932 election to Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt. His legacy was as the man who accelerated an economic downward spiral. He is little revered and less remembered in American History. Conclusion A Reagan style fiscal reflation could be just the tonic the world needs. However a Hoover style protectionist programme might be just the misstep the world fears. It is also not clear that closing borders will bring back jobs as global supply chains are well entrenched and as automation plays such a large role in decreasing the importance of labour in manufacturing today. President-elect Trump has said he is open to compromise on trade. The first 100 days are critical and will no doubt give some clue as to how Trump wants to be remembered. Important Information The information contained in this document is believed to be correct but cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The value of investments will go up and down and clients may get back less than invested. Opinions constitute our judgment as at the date shown and are subject to change without notice. This document is not intended as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities, nor does it constitute a personal recommendation. Where links to third party websites are provided, Close Brothers Asset Management accepts no responsibility for the content of such websites nor the services, products or items offered through such websites. Close Brothers Asset Management is a trading name of Close Asset Management Limited and Close Asset Management (UK) Limited. Both companies are part of Close Brothers Group plc, are registered in England and Wales and are authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered office: 10 Crown Place, London EC2A 4FT. VAT registration number: 245 5013 86. CBAM4291 US Election one week on Hoover vs Reagan Nov 16. EXP 30.11.17