Download Analysis of submissions: Proposal to Classify

Analysis of submissions
Proposal to Classify BZP and related
substances as Class C controlled drugs under
the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975
Final report
Analysis of submissions
Proposal to Classify BZP and related
substances as Class C controlled drugs
under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975
Final report
April 2007
Allen and Clarke Policy and Regulatory Specialists Limited
PO Box 10 730, Wellington 6143
New Zealand
Phone + 64 4 890 7300
Facsimile: + 64 4 890 7301
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://www.allenandclarke.co.nz
Contents
Contents..................................................................................................................................... 2
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 7
1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 7
1.2 The purpose and structure of this report ................................................................. 8
1.3 Submissions received.............................................................................................. 8
2. Key findings ..................................................................................................................... 10
2.1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 10
2.2 Need to regulate “recreational and lifestyle” products ........................................... 10
2.3 Concerns about the consultation process ............................................................. 10
2.4 Concerns about the EACD process....................................................................... 11
2.5 Comments based around drug classification criteria ............................................. 11
2.5.1 The likelihood and evidence of drug abuse............................................... 11
2.5.2 The pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects ................... 12
2.5.3 Evidence of harm ...................................................................................... 13
2.5.4 The risks, if any, to public health ............................................................... 15
2.5.5 Therapeutic value...................................................................................... 18
2.5.6 The potential for use to cause death ......................................................... 18
2.5.7 Creation of physical or psychological dependence ................................... 18
2.6 Other (general) matters raised by submitters ........................................................ 19
2.7 Alternative regulatory regime................................................................................. 21
2.8 EACD Recommendations 1, 2, 3........................................................................... 23
2.9 EACD Recommendation 4 .................................................................................... 26
3. Database of comments made by submitters.................................................................... 28
3.1 The likelihood and evidence of drug abuse ........................................................... 29
3.2 The pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects ............................... 33
3.3 The risks, if any to public health ............................................................................ 48
3.4 Therapeutic value, if any ....................................................................................... 59
3.5 The potential for use to cause death ..................................................................... 61
3.6 Creation of physical of psychological dependence................................................ 63
3.7 International classification and experience in other jurisdictions ........................... 67
3.8 Other matters raised by EACD .............................................................................. 69
3.9 Other matters raised by Submitters ....................................................................... 72
3.10 Alternative regulatory regimes............................................................................... 78
3.11 EACD Recommendations 1 and 3......................................................................... 84
3.12 EACD Recommendation 2 .................................................................................... 92
3.13 EACD Recommendation 4 .................................................................................... 94
3.14 General comments on the review........................................................................ 100
3.15 Other recommendations ...................................................................................... 104
Appendix A: Submissions received (by number) ................................................................... 106
Appendix B: Submissions received (by category).................................................................. 109
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
2
Executive Summary
In November 2006 the Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs (EACD) recommended to Hon
Jim Anderton, Associate Minister of Health, that Benzylpiperazine (BZP) and all known
analogues and derivatives, be classified as Class C1 drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act
1975.
In January 2007, Mr Anderton invited interested parties (manufacturers, retailers, researchers,
users, health agencies, health professionals and others) to comment on the EACD proposal.
It is intended that this comment feed into Mr Anderton’s decision-making on the proposed
classification of the substances.
Sixty-four submissions were received, from a wide range of agencies and individuals, 61 in
total.
This report comprises a detailed database summarising key points made by submitters,
alongside summaries of research papers provided with submissions. The report also provides
a brief overview of the submissions, pulling out key themes and views and, where they exist,
presenting commonalities within and between different groups of agencies and individuals.
Views of proponents for classification of the substances as Class C
Proponents of classification submitted a range of concerns associated with current BZP use.
These included the implications arising from the present legal status of BZP; the serious
adverse pharmacological effects related to BZP use; the public health risks associated with
BZP use; and the need for further research with respect to dependence. Those who supported
classification also noted that a number of other countries have banned BZP.
In the view of the proponents for classification, the current legal status of BZP had resulted in:
•
widespread availability of BZP to users including those who are underage;
•
an inappropriate status which suggests to consumers that BZP products are
safe.
Submissions from those who supported classification considered that there is sufficient
indication of serious harm to warrant an immediate Class C1 classification of BZP. It was
noted that instances existed where users had suffered serious adverse effects when BZP was
used at high dose levels and/or co-ingested with alcohol and other drugs. Submitters
considered that available research studies showed that BZP use has a “narrow ‘safe’ toxic
window”; that the margin between reversible and permanent damage is slim or unpredictable;
and that there is a narrow margin of safety when the drug is used recreationally by some
users.
Further issues raised in relation to the pharmacological effects of BZP included concerns
regarding the effects when BZP is co-ingested with prescription medications; that BZP use
can interfere with anaesthetic drugs and that sufferers of mental illness are at risk of serious
adverse effects from BZP.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
3
Submitters also raised a range of public health issues associated with BZP use:
•
The risk of unsafe sex practices and date rape;
•
The possibility of large numbers of BZP users presenting at hospitals with
adverse effects;
•
The possibility of a legal market leading to the release of an increasing range of
little understood psychoactive compounds;
•
That a “gateway” effect existed where users of BZP were more likely to use
other illegal and potentially more harmful drugs;
•
The risk of potential harm from driving after use of BZP.
Whilst in New Zealand there had been no deaths attributable to BZP use, submitters noted
that this was not evidence of safety. Acknowledging that research is limited on whether BZP
users develop dependence or addiction, some submitters considered that there is a need for
further research and that there already are some indications of dependency among users.
Against the identified personal and public health risks, those who supported classification of
BZP either felt that the drug offered no therapeutic benefit or that any social benefits arising
from BZP use were outweighed by the health risks. These submitters noted that BZP based
substances are prohibited for sale in Australia, the United States of America, Japan, Denmark
and Sweden.
Views of opponents to classification of the substances as Class C
Opponents to classification of BZP and related substances as Class C substances submitted
that the incidence of serious adverse pharmacological effects was low considering the
widespread use of BZPs and that other public health risks were similarly low. It was felt,
however, that these would increase if classification occurred. Submitters indicated that there
are therapeutic benefits related to using BZP and there is little evidence of dependence. They
also outlined the negative consequences that would arise for retail outlets and their
employees if BZP was classified. Submissions commented on the disadvantages and the
failures related to the prohibition approach and provided information on an alternative
regulatory regime.
Opponents to classification submitted that the current legal status of BZPs:
•
•
offered some assurance of content of quality control for users;
reduced the demand for potentially more harmful substances such as
methamphetamine.
Whilst the widespread availability of BZPs was not disputed, submitters did not view this as
having a bearing on the likelihood of abuse. Furthermore, it was claimed that there is little
evidence that commercial manufacturers and retailers are actively targeting under-age users.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
4
If and when this occurs, the issue of under-age use could be managed through better
monitoring and enforcement of controls.
The submissions from opponents to classification reflected a range of views on the effects of
BZP. Several submissions considered the level of risk of harm from BZP use alone is low as
demonstrated by the few serious adverse events reported compared with the high level of
use. A number of submissions opposing classification noted that there has been no death in
New Zealand recorded as a result of BZP use despite the very high level of use. Submitters
noted that any adverse effects were at a low level of impact to health or were reversible.
Whereas these views differed from some of the research available, several submitters
opposing classification expressed their view that the published papers, research trials and
reports had methodological or analytical weaknesses. It was also noted that there is a lack of
knowledge about whether adverse effects attributed were due to BZP alone, co-ingestion with
alcohol and other drugs or lack of controls/deficient manufacturing.
Several submitters considered that public health risks from BZP use were at the low end of
the scale when compared to alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs like cannabis. Instead, it was
argued that BZP use provided a “gateway” away from potentially more harmful illegal drugs.
Submitters suggested that classification of BZP would present the greatest threat to public
health because:
•
it criminalises continuing users and brings young people into contact with the
criminal element in society;
•
manufacturing standards of BZP products could no longer be guaranteed;
•
Users would be more likely to use illegal and potentially more harmful drugs;
•
The use of illegal drugs is more likely to lead to intravenous use which
introduces further substantial health risks.
Those opposing classification emphasised the social benefits arising from BZP use.
Most submitters consider that there is little evidence indicating that BZP use leads to
dependence.
Submitters acknowledged the potential for harm if recommended BZP dosages were not
followed or if BZP was used with other substances. It was felt, however, that from a harm
reduction perspective BZPs should be handled by regulation similar to that in place for
tobacco and alcohol rather than by classification as Class C1 substances. Submitters
indicated that regulation could establish better quality control; dose and use information; and
further limits on outlets and marketing. Regulation allowed for revenue to be raised through
excise tax to be used in harm reduction to fund education about “safe use”. Some submitters,
while remaining opposed to classification of other forms of BZP as Class C1, wanted a ban on
BZP sold in powder.
A number of submissions pointed out that prohibition would fail to minimise harm to users and
lead to poor use of public funds. Submitters noted that BZP is not banned in the Netherlands,
Norway, and other EU member states. Where it has been banned (Australia and USA),
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
5
submitters have been critical regarding the robustness of the decision making process that led
to those bans.
Industry submitters opposing classification noted that making BZP illegal would lead to staff
losses and undermine the viability of some retail outlets.
Other findings
A number of submitters considered that the potential harm from the use of BZP at this point is
unknown or that there is insufficient information about long-term effects. The need for further
research was raised. Further research and consideration was also felt necessary on the issue
of whether BZP was a gateway drug to illicit substances and whether criminalisation of BZP
would increase other substance misuse.
A number of transitional concerns were raised in regards to classification of BZP:
•
stockpiling of BZP products occurring with criminals looking forward to taking control of
the market once BZP is made illegal;
•
a pre-ban dumping on the market of BZP by commercial outlets at reduced prices;
•
a need to appropriately fund and support the wide range of treatment, social and
enforcement services that would be affected by classification;
•
suggestion that reclassification, if decided on, be delayed until a management strategy
can be put in place to manage stockpiles; and changes to National Intelligence
Information Technology can be implemented.
There was some criticism of the process of consultation, with some submitters alleging bias
and predetermination.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
6
1.
Introduction
1.1
Background
In March 2004, the Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs (EACD) considered
benzylpiperazine (BZP) and related substances in terms of their possible classification under
the Misuse of Drugs Act’s controlled drug Schedules. The EACD summarised the evidence to
date regarding use and harms of these substances but concluded that there was insufficient
information available on which to base a recommendation for classification under any of the
existing Schedules in the Misuse of Drugs Act. However, the EACD recommended further
investigation of the substances, including consideration of possible options for their regulation,
including such approaches as the setting of conditions on promotion and sale, under-age
purchase restrictions, etc.
In June 2005 the Misuse of Drugs Act was amended to provide the framework for the
regulation of “restricted substances”, substances that are considered to be deserving of
control, but not outright prohibition. This reflected the framework the EACD had indicated in
its March 2004 report might be an alternative to an outright ban for BZP and other substances.
BZP was classified as a restricted substance but no regulations were developed to set
controls on its promotion or use.
In November 2006, the EACD reconsidered its previous position on BZP and related
substances. Based on further advice and research that had been compiled, the EACD
assessed BZP and related substances against the criteria for classification set out in section
4B of the Misuse of Drugs Act. The EACD concluded that while there were potential
advantages in regulating BZP and related substances as “restricted substances” – and that
some of the concerns about their current availability and use could be resolved in this manner
– in practice this would require the establishment of a significant administrative and
enforcement capacity, for example as there is for pharmaceuticals and for the legal drugs
tobacco and alcohol. The EACD’s assessment concluded that BZP poses a moderate risk of
harm and should thus be classified as a Class C1 substance under the Misuse of Drugs Act
1975. However, at the same time the EACD recommended that “…work continue to further
develop the regulatory framework and enforcement capacity that would support the Restricted
Substances provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act 2005.”
As a result of this advice from the EACD, in January 2007 the Associate Minister of Health,
Hon Jim Anderton, wrote to interested parties seeking comment on the possible
reclassification of BZP and related substances as Class C1 substances. He noted that if the
reclassification did occur, all quantities of BZP, phenylpiperazine and related piperazines will
be illegal and subject to penalties under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975. The letter noted the
significant implications that any decision to reclassify BZP and related substances may have
on agencies that manufacture and retail these products and emphasised that the Minister
would take into account the submissions he receives before he makes his final decision and
recommendation regarding their classification.
Interested parties were given until 23 March 2007 to make submissions. Sixty-four
submissions were received by or shortly after that date, from 61 individuals or agencies.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
7
1.2
The purpose and structure of this report
The purpose of this report is to summarise and analyse the submissions made in response to
the January 2007 letter from Hon Jim Anderton regarding the potential classification of BZP
and related substances as Class C1 controlled substances under the Misuse of Drugs Act
1975. The report is presented in three parts.
•
Part 1 provides an introduction and some background information on the review.
•
Part 2 presents the key findings of the analysis of submissions, including commentary
presented on a stakeholder basis, where that is useful (although within many stakeholder
categories there was considerable variation: both in terms of views presented, and on the
types of issues commented upon).
•
Part 3 provides a detailed database of comments made by submitters, presented by
classification criteria and by key issues. The database also presents these views by
stakeholder group.
1.3
Submissions received
The Ministry of Health received submissions from 61 agencies or individuals on the proposal
to classify BZP and related substances as Class C1 controlled substances. A total of 64
submissions were received as three submitters provided two submissions each (ref 8 & 8a, 61
& 61a, 52 & 53). A full list of submitters is attached as Appendices A and B. Appendix A
presents submitters in numerical order, and Appendix B presents submitters by category.
Submissions came from a range of sources:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
6 individuals (not counting the 9,186 signatories to a petition organised by Energy
Supplements Limited)
3 community agencies
5 researchers or research organisations
4 health advocacy / interest groups
1 DHB public health service
4 health professionals writing in a private capacity
5 health professional bodies / agencies
4 alcohol / drug treatment agencies
2 DHBs / emergency health providers
7 retailers / retail organisations (including two retail organisations that provided two
submissions each. Two submissions attached petitions: one signed by individuals
(see above) and one apparently signed by 279 retail outlets and sellers).
4 organisations with the primary role of drug policy / law reform1
5 government / state agencies, two of which are enforcement-focussed agencies, and
three that have a primarily social policy focus
One political party.
1
Note that the New Zealand Drug Foundation was included under the health advocacy / interest group category instead, but
could have been included under the drug policy / law reform category as well given its role as a leading agency in the debate over
drug policy and law reform in New Zealand.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
8
The breakdown of the submissions is shown in figure 1 below:
Figure 1: Breakdown of submissions
Individuals
Community agencies
10% 2%
11%
Researchers / Research organisations
6%
8%
Health advocacy / Interest groups
DHB public health service
Health professionals in private capacity
10%
Health professional bodies / agencies
Alcohol / Drug treatment agencies
13%
8%
4%
8%
2%
10%
8%
DHBs / Emergency health providers
Retailers / Retail organisations
Drug policy / law reform
Government / State agencies
Political party
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
9
2.
Key findings
2.1
Introduction
This section of the report summarises the key points made in submissions, identifying where
there is consensus within and between groups of submitters. It draws exclusively on the
detailed database of submitters’ comments that comprises section 3 of this report.
Where appropriate, different types of submitters have been grouped together to facilitate
summarising of comment, particularly where the breadth of views and comments made are
similar. All comments and views are linked to those submitters who have presented them, by
inclusion of submission numbers within brackets at the end of each point made. Appendices
A and B to this report set out lists of submissions for ease of reference. Appendix A presents
submissions in numerical order, Appendix B presents them by category of submitter.
In developing their submissions most submitters did not submit in the structure of the EACD
letter to the Minister and instead made general comments about the recommendations. A
small number submitted in line with the EACD recommendations and these comments
together with those extracted from submitters’ general comments are included in the detailed
summaries below.
2.2
Need to regulate “recreational and lifestyle” products
Almost all submitters commented on and supported the need for a regulatory framework that
can place appropriate controls on “recreational and lifestyle substances” on the market now
and in the future. The only exceptions to this were the few submitters that made no specific
recommendations.
2.3
Concerns about the consultation process
A number of submitters opposed to classifying BZP as Class C1 drugs were critical of the
consultation process. Points made included:
•
•
•
•
•
•
The Associate Minister’s many media statements suggest a pre-determination of view
(35, 37, 44, 61/61a)
The public or consumers were not invited to submit in the first instance and then had a
short time frame in which to make their submissions (35, 44)
Significant pieces of information used by the EACD were not available to many of the
submitters and not referenced in the FAQ on the website (35, 54, 57)
Media misinformation and hype has negatively influenced perceptions and made it
difficult to find out the facts (35, 37, 54, 57)
There needs to be a further round of consultation through a select committee process
(44)
One felt restricted on the time provided, particularly given delays or difficulty accessing
some of the information, and that it has not had access to all the information requested
such as copies of submissions by researchers currently undertaking research into BZP
(61 & 61a).
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
10
2.4
Concerns about the EACD process
A group of submitters opposed to classifying BZP as Class C1 criticised the EACD decisionmaking. Points made included that the EACD:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
recommendation relied on unpublished and un-replicated research/reports that had not
been under a robust peer review process (7, 37, 44, 54, 61/61a)
has not defined moderate risk and has not undertaken a formal risk assessment (37)
was asked only to evaluate harm not potential benefits (42, 54)
has not evaluated other harm minimisation options such as tighter regulation (19, 54)
has relied on information from two sources (letter from the National Poisons Centre
and report form the MRINZ) that are subject to serious challenge (7, 37, 54)
has formed conclusions from results of recent studies in which there has been
inaccuracies as well as misinterpretation and misrepresentation of the facts. (7, 37, 54)
has relied on research where the researchers could be viewed as having been
compromised by the need to bid for funds or having a conflict of interest because of
funding source (35, 55)
does not appear to have considered and provided recommendations, as required by
legislation, on the practicalities of imposing restrictions or the ability to enforce those
restrictions and requirements (61/61a).
A drug policy/law reform agency (42) recommended change to the makeup of EACD to
include lay people.
2.5
Comments based around drug classification criteria
2.5.1 The likelihood and evidence of drug abuse
There is no dispute amongst submitters about the widespread availability and use of BZP
based party pills (5, 8, 8A, 37, 19, 44, 54). One submitter pointed to the risk of accidental
ingestion by toddlers due to the widespread availability (20). One health professional
organisation expressed concern at the ready availability of party pills sold as dietary
supplements (36). One submitter noted that although BZP is widely used, the submitter did
not accept that BZP products are actively marketed due to regulations prohibiting TV radio,
print and periodical advertising (54).
Two submitters attempted to estimate use. One submitter estimated use in New Zealand over
the period 2000-2007 to be 24 million pills used by 400,000 people, consumed on 9.5 million
occasions or equivalent to 1.2 million person years of use (37) Evidence suggests that 2.5 to
2.6 pills is the average dosage taken and around 70% of users take two or less pills on a
typical occasion (37, 61/61a).
Some submitters considered use would decline if the number of outlets was reduced (5, 31).
Submitter 31, a youth council, also suggested controls limiting times and occasions that pills
can be sold.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
11
One industry group submitted that prevalence of BZP use is strong evidence of its social
acceptability in New Zealand, that availability has no bearing on likelihood of abuse, and any
potential for abuse can best be controlled by regulation (61/61a). One individual submitter also
noted that widespread use does not equate to abuse and that considering the level of use
there is little evidence of substance abuse (37). Another submitter considered that BZP use
is part of normal risk-taking behaviour of among adolescents (45).
There is no dispute that party pills are used with alcohol and one submitter considered this to
be inevitable (29). One health professional organisation (36) submitted that they accepted the
EACD view that BZPs possess a moderate risk of harm, especially when taken with alcohol. A
submitter involved in public health considers there is link between binge drinking and the
consumption of BZPs as this accentuates the effect of BZP. It was noted that this also
increases the risk of harm to the user (28) There is dispute about the level of abuse related to
this combined use of BZP and alcohol with some (health providers, retailers/industry group)
considering use of party pills may moderate alcohol use (50, 44, 54) and one health
practitioner noting that from personal observation the increased mental alertness of BZP use
may have protective benefits offsetting the effects of alcohol (19).
Several submitters noted the wide-spread use of BZP by those under 18 years (5, 27, 60).
There was some concern that recently imposed restrictions on sales to minors had not been
adequately enforced (47 54). One submitter recorded an anecdotal report of a seller setting up
in a children’s play area (48). This submitter, a group of school counsellors, also considered
that several of their most challenging students are regularly using BZP, often along with
alcohol and cannabis and noted this is particularly noticeable amongst nine and ten year old
males.
Two submitters considered that there is little evidence that commercial manufacturers and
retailers are actively targeting under-age users (43, 54). Another submitter considered that
underage use of BZPs is less than that for cannabis and alcohol (58).
2.5.2 The pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
Submitters presented a range of views as to the risk and extent of adverse effects with
respect to the use of BZP. Based on available information, opinion is split as to the frequency
of negative effects when BZP is used according to recommendation, the likely extent of effect
and potential harm and consequently the best way to manage that risk or harm. As a result of
this split in opinion over the effects of BZP use, two groups of opinion emerged: the first group
favouring classification and ban whilst the second group favoured harm minimisation and
tighter regulation.
In forming their views, submitters in both groups have generally relied upon the same limited
number of published papers, research trial and reports. Some submitters in the second group
(opposing classification) tend to consider there are weaknesses in the published papers,
research trials and reports (37, 7, 47, 23, 54, 61 & 61a).
A number of submitters considered that the potential harm from the use of BZP is unknown or
that there is insufficient information about long-term effects (13, 7, 38). One health
professional (20) raised the issue of personal and democratic rights noting that industry
encouraging the public to consume 20 million doses of BZP without establishing evidence of
safety constitutes a large scientific experiment. The submitter refers to the right ‘not to be
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
12
subjected to medical or scientific experimentation’. One submitter considers that because of
the unknown risks BZP should be classified (13) whereas another considers that the unknown
risks should be handled through regulation rather than by making the product illegal (31). One
submitter notes the lack of knowledge in relation to a “safe dose” and records the necessity to
standardise product and dosage and gain more information on the effects of co-ingestion with
alcohol (27).
2.5.3 Evidence of harm
Evidence of serious harm
Several submitters (two private individuals (13, 48), one research team (4), three health
professionals (2, 20, 38), two health professional bodies (12, 17) one alcohol/drug treatment
provider (18)), considered there is sufficient indication of serious harm to warrant
immediate classification of BZP and related substances as Class C1 controlled drugs.
This group of submitters note that some users have suffered serious adverse effects when
BZP is used at high dose levels and co-ingested with alcohol and other drugs. The submitters
considered that studies on cases presented to Emergency Departments show that BZP use
has a “narrow ‘safe’ toxic window”; that the margin between reversible and permanent
damage is slim or unpredictable; and there is a narrow margin of safety when the drug is used
recreationally by some users (2, 20, 38).
Submitters noted studies or events that indicate that users risk dystonia (2, 17), seizures (2,
20, 38, 12,17), severe respiratory and metabolic acidosis (2, 17), paranoia and hallucinations
(12), acute psychosis (2, 20), hyperthermia (20, 2, 12), organ failure, sometimes involving
multiple organs (20), prolonged vomiting (20, 17), headache (20), anxiety attacks (20),
dehydration(12), cardiac arrhythmias (17, 12), hypertension (12), abdominal pain (12),
insomnia (17) and urinary retention (17). It was noted that some of these events even if
treated could lead to permanent lifetime abnormalities and premature death (2).
Submitters in this group consider that all psychoactive drugs should be subjected to
assessment and regulatory approval before made available for use (2, 4, 20). Some
submitters refer to personal experience of cases presented in Waikato and Christchurch.
(Note institutional linkage between submissions 12, 17, 20, 38)
A group of school counsellors consider that there is the potential for adverse effects to
increase when BZPs are used by younger people (48). A number of submitters were
concerned about the potential for increased adverse effects through the co-ingestion of BZP
alcohol or other substances (youth workers: 48, youth council: 31, health professional 20/38,
health professional organisations: 12, 17). A community group (3) was also concerned about
the effects of co-ingestion of BZP and alcohol. One DHB (11) referred to a report that
indicated that use of BZP posed a health risk for users particularly for those who regularly take
over the maximum dosage and co-ingest with alcohol.
Other issues raised were that sufferers of mental illness are at risk of serious adverse effects
from BZP use (18); that BZP use can interfere with anaesthetic drugs and cause adverse
reactions (17); and that all psychoactive substances disrupt normal neurological functions and
that the margin between reversible/side effects and permanent damage can be slim or
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
13
unpredictable (20). One submitter noted that the reports of hallucination and panic attacks are
probably related to TFMPP (19).
Evidence of low / manageable harm
Some submissions (three private individuals (37, 43, 57), one community group (31), two
research teams (7, 47), three health advocacy groups (23, 27, 45), one health professional
(19) two industry submitters (52, 54), one drug /policy reform group (42), one state agency
(58)) considered the level of risk of harm is low as demonstrated by the few serious
adverse events reported compared with the high level of use. One health professional (19)
considered that the effects of BZP use were mild compared to alcohol and that there may be
some protective benefits (19). One large drug health provider reported that there was
evidence of persons seeking treatment as a result of BZP use alone (50). Other submitters
note that although there are adverse effects these occur rarely (27, 45, 58); are reversible
(37); and are lower than those related to alcohol use (43, 52) and the use of other legal (45) or
illegal drugs (43, 45, 52, 54). It was noted that for most users the common adverse effects
are insomnia, headaches, nausea and anxiety (58). Some of this group considered that the
side effects may in fact be limiting use of BZP (47).
Drawing on the same limited number of published reports as those used by the groups
recording adverse effects, submitters tended to consider that the serious effects which have
been observed have resulted from excessive doses and co-ingestion with other drugs possibly
also at unsafe levels. An industry group submitted that BZP presents a low risk to personal
health compared to alcohol and tobacco. It challenged the EACD statement that risks of BZP
use are lower than methamphetamine and broadly similar to that of ephedrine, as there are no
studies to compare products or risks. The submission argued that there is no finding in
evidence supporting the EACD’s advice that ‘as with alcohol and other psychoactive drugs,
there is the potential to affect neurodevelopment in adolescents’. The group challenged the
EACD’s use of anecdotal reports. The group acknowledged there are concerns about
contamination or mixing with other substances, under age users, and people exceeding the
recommended dose. The submitter suggested, however, that there is lack of knowledge about
whether adverse effects attributed are due to BZP alone, “drug cocktails” or lack of
controls/deficient manufacturing. The submitter also argued that EACD should await the
results of further trials currently underway before a decision on classification is made (61/61a).
With respect to BZP use and the incidence of seizures, various issues were brought up by
submitters from this group including that the incidence of seizures referred to one study is
related to taking BZPs at above the recommended dose (19); that there was the potential for
the seizures to be a result of co-ingestion with other non-reported recreational drugs (7) one
submitter indicated that nearly all patients who suffered from seizures had been using multiple
drugs at the time (58); that the risk of seizures is increased for those who have epilepsy (19);
and that there is no evidence of causality as the background rate of seizures had not
increased (37).
One submitter also noted cases of psychosis are also within the expected background level
(37). This submitter also commented that National Poisons Centre data showed there has
been no documented adverse event when the BZP dose is known and where the dose is
within the industry maximum.
Submitters from this group challenged the validity of the MRINZ trial in that they consider
excessive doses of BZP were used in an atypical manner which was at variance with other
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
14
population studies (7, 23, 27, 37, 45, 61/61a). These submitters acknowledged there is risk
but considered the risks from BZP use can be managed through regulation based on harm
minimisation (42).
Submitters in this group recognised the cluster of BZP-related adverse events in Christchurch
but note that similar clusters have not been observed in Auckland (7, 37, 57) and that more
recently the frequency in Christchurch is declining (7, 37, 57, 23, 45). Submitter 47 noted the
rate of adverse events seems to have reduced since 2004.
The different views regarding the pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects of
BZP used are summarised in table 1 below:
Private individuals
Table 1: Views on extent of adverse effect
Group 1:
harm is Group 2: harm is low
sufficiently
serious
to considering frequency of
justify classification
use
13, 48
37, 43, 57
Community Group
Researcher
Health Advocacy
Public Health Service
Health Professionals
Health Professional Bodies
Drug treatment provider
Retailer/Industry Group
Drug Policy
State Agency
4
2, 20, 38
12, 17
18
31 (majority)
7, 47
23, 27, 45
19
52, 54, 61/61a
42
58
One community group (31) considers the level of risk is of concern but not sufficient to warrant
classification.
2.5.4 The risks, if any, to public health
A broad range of views were reflected in the submissions regarding the extent to which there
are risks to public health relating to the use of BZP.
One DHB (11) referred to a report that referred to several health risks related to the use of
BZP including unprotected sex, non-consensual sex, drink spiking and black out episodes. A
youth worker and a social worker (5, 59) considered the extensive pill culture is leading to pill
swapping and the risk of date rape and unsafe sex practices.
A health professional (2) was concerned about the large number of patients (61 in number)
presenting 80 times at one hospital in a five month period and considers this average rate of
four persons per week has significant implications for public health outcomes. A further health
professional (20) shared this concern but considered that the impact on public health is
difficult to predict. This submitter considered that the current public health impact of BZP is not
known as there is no good information around hospital admissions and considerable
inconsistency in the way BZP incidences are classified. A further individual (37), however,
considered that the impact of BZP use on hospital admissions is very low estimating that there
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
15
have been fewer than 20 BZP-related admissions over seven years out of a total of five million
hospital admissions due to any cause. This submitter calculated that in 2005 the total costs for
the Canterbury DHB in relation to treating patients who had consumed BZP including those
who had co-ingested alcohol, cannabis, and other drugs were less than $100,000 out of a
budget of $1,000 million. A health advocacy group (46) submitted that personal and social
harm resulting from the use of BZP and related piperazines was at the lower end of the scale
when compared to alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs like cannabis.
Submitter 20 expressed concerns that the retention of a legal market for party pills could
release an unknown number of a rapidly increasing range of little understood psychoactive
compounds. A professional health body concurred with these concerns and noted these could
include psychoactive compounds used by indigenous cultures and novel designer drugs (17).
Two retailers (44, 55) did not accept that there is strong and irrefutable evidence of a severe
risk to public health and safety associated with BZP use. One of these submitters noted there
was no evidence of BZP causing aggressive behaviours, sexual assault or date-rape type
behaviours (54). This submitter also noted that an enforced age limit should prevent any
impact on the neurodevelopment of adolescents. Submitters suggested that the adverse
effects of BZP may discourage users and could reduce the overall desire for drug use (54,
55).
On the other hand, a further health professional (19) considered that any classification of BZP
would create a greater public health risk with a corresponding move by users towards
methamphetamine use or illegal street party pills which contain a mix of BZP and
methamphetamine-like substances. This submitter considered that most BZP presentations to
the public health system involve co-ingestion with other substances. Several submitters noted
that legal BZP was less harmful than other illegal drugs and considered that if BZP was made
illegal this could lead to an increase in the use of methamphetamines and other drugs (54, 35,
61/61a).
Submitters’ views are divided on the question of whether BZP acts as a “gateway drug” to or
from other drugs. BZP users are considered more likely to experiment with other drugs (8,
8A). One health practitioner considered that BZP use will lead to eventual use of more
addictive drugs and crime. This submitter also noted that one individual had suffered an acute
psychotic episode after ingesting Rapture with small quantities of cannabis and nitrous oxide
(2). However, an alcohol and drug treatment provider (50) considered that the availability of
BZP and related substances appears to have reduced the demand for substances like
methamphetamine and that P use is no longer ‘accepted’ or condoned in circles where BZP is
deemed (and experienced as) a safer alternative. A submission from an industry group also
referred to the IDMS Report 2005 which suggested that legal party pills may have reduced the
demand for P and noted that a ban may reverse this trend (61/61a). A retailer (44) further
submitted that BZP use had reduced the prevalence of more harmful drugs. One submitter
considered that the lesser amphetamine abuse problem in New Zealand compared with
Australia could perhaps be explained by widespread BZP use in New Zealand (19).
Those who consider that BZP acts as a gateway include submissions 20, 29 and 35. One of
these, an organisation working with youth (29), considered that since BZP mimics
amphetamine it leads youth to try the real thing. Submission 29 noted that trying the real thing
has become easier as the ready availability of BZP is pushing down the price of harder illicit
drugs. Submitter 20, an ED physician and researcher, is concerned that long term effects of
stimulant use acts as a gateway to other drug use, and also pointed out that effects such as
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
16
changes to permanent brain chemistry are not being screened for adequately. This submitter
notes that it could be argued that the legal status of party pills are attracting non-users not
necessarily users away from amphetamines and that BZP use is introducing a naive
population to psychoactive drugs. This submitter also referred to research that suggested a
binge poly-drug culture and noted any additive effects of drugs in combination should be given
careful consideration.
Other submitters did not regard BZP to be a gateway to other drugs (57, 19, 58). Submitter
58, advisors on youth policy, referred to the SHORE survey which indicated that BZP is acting
as a gateway away from harder drugs. Submitter 40, an alcohol and drug service, considered
there needed to be further work on this because if BZP can be shown as keeping users away
from harder drugs, then making it illegal may result in greater use of illicit harder drugs. One
health professional (19), through personal communications, had formed the view that party pill
users were purchasing fewer illicit drugs because of the considerably lower price of party pills.
One submitter referred to research and noted that it was not possible to estimate what the rate
of use of amphetamine or methamphetamine use would have been if party pills were not
available (27). One Alcohol and Drug Treatment Provider (40) supported further debate on the
issue of whether BZP was a gateway drug to illicit substances and whether criminalisation of
BZP would increase other substance misuse.
Industry submitter 54 also referred to a study that found no conclusive evidence to support the
gateway theory (that use of BZP would result in users being more likely to use other
potentially more harmful drugs). One submitter referred to a study that indicated that some
respondents had reduced their consumption of illegal drugs due to the availability of party pills
and a small percentage had stopped their use of illegal drugs (61 & 61a).
The issue of intravenous use of BZP was raised. One health professional (19) noted that use
of these substances is more likely to lead to intravenous drug use which introduces further
substantial health risks. Another submission, however, suggested that those who use BZP
intravenously at present were already intravenous users and used BZP when their drug of
choice was not available and it was further noted that BZP used intravenously is very
unpleasant (54). A further submitter considered that classifying BZP would raise the price with
the result that users looking for a more cost-efficient option may turn to use BZP powder
intravenously (35). One submitter considered that increased potential intravenous use was
unlikely because BZP is caustic and hence painful and therefore unlikely to become popular
(7).
One individual (43) acknowledged the potential for harm by BZP users driving or operating
machinery while intoxicated and suggested that drugged driving could be approached by a
harm reduction education campaign. A concern regarding the potential harm from driving after
use of BZP was also stated by one State agency (32). A health advocacy group (23) referred
to research indicating that it is likely that a minority of BZP users are driving under the
influence at times. On the other hand, one industry submitter (54) referred to research that
indicated that BZP improves driving performance. A further industry submission cited a survey
in which participant responses indicated that no driving accidents had followed party pill
consumption (61 &61a).
Another individual (35) saw a public health risk in the publicity given to some BZP cases as
this could result in users losing trust in health professionals and preventing them from
presenting to hospitals.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
17
2.5.5 Therapeutic value
Most submitters did not comment specifically on this area. Submitters break into two distinct
groups of view: those who consider that stimulants and other recreational drugs offer no
therapeutic benefit (48) or that any social benefits are outweighed by the health risks (2); and
those who consider BZP and other stimulants fill a basic human requirement (50, 54). One
submitter noted that BZP is on the international sports list of “performance enhancing” drugs
(56). One individual submitter diagnosed with depressive disorder and social phobia found
use of BZP to be effective and of therapeutic value where other conventional
pharmacotherapy treatment had failed (1). A community group noted the social benefit of
BZP use for shy people (31). Another individual noted the weight loss as a benefit (62).
2.5.6 The potential for use to cause death
Almost all submitters noted that there has been no death in New Zealand recorded as a result
of BZP use. Two submitters make this comment while observing the very high level of use (37,
43). Some submitters comment that there is no death recorded worldwide due to BZP use and
reported cases of any problems were rare compared with those associated with other
recreational drug use (7, 37, 61/61a).
One submitter, however, noted that BZP was found in Swedish forensic autopsies (2).
Another submitter considered that if all emergency department records were studied in detail
there would be evidence of death associated with alcohol and BZP use which has missed
identification (5). A further submitter proposed that widespread use without death is not
evidence of safety (20).
2.5.7 Creation of physical or psychological dependence
Most submitters considered that there is little evidence indicating that BZP use leads to
dependence. However, some submitters consider there is a need for further research or that
there are some indications of dependency among users.
A number of submitters consider that there is little evidence of BZP causing addiction (7, 19,
37, 43, 47, 58, 57). Additional points made by these submitters included: that BZP use is not
placing a burden on addiction and mental health services (58); that the unpleasant comedown
after use prevents the user from wanting more (43, 19); that evaluation of all published data
produced little evidence of BZP and/or TFMPP use inducing physical or psychological
dependence (7); that analysis of the Wilkins (SHORE) report pointed at BZP being at the
lower end of dependence (47); that from the personal experience of an alcohol and drug
treatment specialist BZP is not the primary substance of dependence and is seen only in
those with a history of dependence (47). Submitters considered that BZP had a lower
dependence potential than illicit amphetamines (50, 43).
Submitter 54 noted that the EACD has made no attempt to differentiate between slight
withdrawal symptoms and addiction and users already having co-dependence on other
substances. One industry group identified research it had commissioned which showed that
no respondents who took party pills thought it would be difficult or impossible to stop taking
party pills, whereas 27.5% of alcohol users thought this would apply to alcohol. This research
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
18
indicated that 3.6% of legal party pill users thought their consumption “was out of control”
(61/61a).
One submitter noted that research on users developing dependence is limited and
inconsistent and it may be some years before evidence emerges (27). Submitter 20, an
emergency department physician and researcher, noted that the suggestion people will turn to
other legal “herbals” or illicit drugs suggests a level of dependency has been fostered since
the introduction of BZP.
One submitter considered that making BZP illegal would encourage the use of other drugs
(35). One researcher (8, 8A) presented preliminary results from a survey aimed at trying to
test the argument that BZP offers an alternative for other illicit drugs. Based on these results
it was speculated that classification: will not result in a “swing back to P”; that party pill users
will continue to use party pills as another item on the illicit poly-drug user’s menu; and that
there may be some shift towards ecstasy. A further submitter did not accept that making party
pills unavailable would encourage use of harder drugs and noted that the argument for the
prohibition of BZP is as good as it is for heroin and class A drugs (5). Submitter 36
considered that making the drugs illicit will deter most users away from use.
2.6
Other (general) matters raised by submitters
A range of other matters were raised:
Price effect
One submitter (29) considered the wide availability of BZP was: pushing down the price of the
harder alternatives viz ecstasy and methamphetamine; making them more affordable and
leading to greater use by those who prefer to use illicit drugs and who may prefer to support
friend and family ventures.
Submitter 56 considered classification will see a rise in price and a consequent increase in
intravenous drug use as users try to get a more cost effective “high”. Other submitters were
concerned that classification of BZP would lead to increased illegal drug consumption (43,
61/61a).
Legal status implies “safe”
Some submitters considered the current generally unrestricted status inappropriately suggests
to consumers that the products are “safe” (2, 5, 48).
Legal status allows assurance for users
One submitter supported the current legal status as it offered some reassurance of content,
and quality control for users (43).
“War on drugs” leads to poor use of public funds and fails to minimise harm
One health professional opposed to classification referred to the failure of the “War on Drugs”
policy and indicated that prohibition fails to minimise harm to users and leads to poor use of
public funds of which a great deal would be required to police the ban and deal with the
resulting workflow (19). A number of others submitters opposing classification presented
similar views including an industry group (61/61a) and private individuals (24, 25, 35, 37, 43).
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
19
Instead they recommended regulation and control (43) with excise funds used to support harm
minimisation strategies as with tobacco and alcohol (27, 43).
Transitional concerns
Some submitters noted that the Minister’s letter has had an impact in the market place. A
health professional (20) believed that stockpiling is occurring with criminals looking forward to
taking control of the market once BZP is made illegal whilst commercial outlets were
stockpiling legal alternatives. An industry submitter (54) suggested that BZP will be dumped
on the market by commercial outlets at reduced prices.
A State agency (21) noted there has been no increase in importation of BZP since the
Minister’s announcement of the review. A public health service provider (28) recommended
that adequate time and resources be given to enforcement agencies including resources for a
significant public information campaign.
A public health service (28) noted that there will be a need to adequately fund and support
treatment services irrespective of the decision on classification. This submitter went further
and noted it would be unethical to alter supply control status without also providing services to
addicts to stop using and avoid gaining a criminal conviction. An industry group also noted the
need for additional enforcement capacity for Police, Customs and the Courts and in relation to
technical evidence of the drug’s constituency (61/61a).
A further State agency commented on the potential for classification of BZP to increase the
number of young people needing youth justice services and CYF interventions (to respond to
arrests in the 13 to 16 age group) (60).
Ban on BZP in powder form
Two individuals (37, 43) and a health advocacy group (23) want a ban on BZP sold in powder
form while remaining opposed to classification of other forms of BZP as Class C1.
Economic impact on the commercial sector
One private individual (9) and two industry submitters (54, 61/61a) expressed their concern
about the impact of classification on the viability of retail outlets and on the continued
employment of staff. An individual (55) and an industry submitter (54) also noted that the loss
of business will have a negative impact on tax and excise revenue and on overseas earnings.
A further retailer (44) noted that the government has allowed a legitimate business to develop
over a seven year period and that therefore classification would result in a substantial
confiscation of property rights. A State agency (21) observed that international marketing may
continue but manufacture will move offshore with risk of poorer quality control and loss of
revenue to New Zealand.
Management of classification
A State agency (21) noted that:
• BZP is normally distributed by mail this may make control difficult if reclassification
occurs;
• Management will require good liaison with manufacturers;
• There will be logistical impacts if BZP is imported/exported illicitly. Impacts will be in
frontline detection, the need for specific testing kits, increased demand for substance
identification services, retraining of staff, and impact on investigation resources.
A further State agency (32) suggested that reclassification be delayed until:
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
20
•
•
a management strategy can be put in place to manage stockpiles;
changes can be implemented to National Intelligence Information Technology
including creation of new offences, offence codes; management of the interface with
Courts Management System and training and internal communication, etc.
Operational impacts will depend on competing operational requirements. This submitter warns
against unrealistic enforcement expectations.
Another State agency (58) asked what would happen if further research demonstrates low
harm – is there a process by which manufacturers can resubmit products for reclassification?
Will classification prevent further research? This submitter also notes the findings of the
United Kingdom Parliamentary Select Committee and notes the United Kingdom classification
system is not fit for purpose and should be replaced by a more scientifically-based scale of
harm.
Submitter 32 noted the numerous forms of piperazines and makes specific recommendations
about the way they should be classified.
Miscellaneous issues
Further points made included that:
• referring to BZP products as “herbal” is fraudulent and retailers who do so should be
prosecuted under the Fair Trading Act (37)
• one submitter was concerned to ask if the Government is being influenced by the
proposed trans-Tasman therapeutic products regulatory regime (55)
• one submitter is concerned about reliance on one large manufacturer and on imported
product (31)
• several submitters called for further research (23, 27, 46) and one called for
postponing any decision (27)
• one submitter expressed concern over the impacts of convictions on individuals if BZP
becomes illegal (61/61a).
2.7
Alternative regulatory regime
Most submitters supported the development of a framework, whether classification was
adopted or not, in which “recreational and lifestyle” substances can be reviewed and
regulation applied either within the current Act or within new legislative framework so as to
establish:
•
•
•
•
•
better quality control (individuals: 25, 26, 37, 43, 55. researcher: 7. health advocacy:
23,45. youth council: 31 retailer: 9, 30, 44, 52)
dose and use information (individual: 25, 26, 37, 43, 55. researcher: 47. health
advocacy: 23, 45)
market restrictions such as age limits on purchase, limits on retail outlets, limits on
advertising; licensing of distributors; (individual: 25, 26, 37, 43 19. researcher: 7, 47.
health advocacy: 23,45. retailer: 9, 30, 44, 52)
penalties directed towards the seller not the purchaser; (health professional: 20, 19)
national monitoring and surveillance (health professional: 20).
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
21
Those opposed to classification want to see BZP better regulated. Comments on advantages
to be obtained by having a better regulated regime, without classification, can be grouped
under the following arguments:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
It puts the onus on manufacturers to prove safety and establish safe dose and use
through clinical trials; (health professional: 20. researcher: 4)
It allows for revenue to be raised through excise tax; excise revenue can be used to
fund education about “safe use”; (individual; 24, 55. drug policy agency; 33, 42. health
advocacy: 27)
It provides for a harm minimisation approach and signals the risk of these products as
opposed to sending a false message of being “safe” (individuals: 24, 35, 37.
researcher: 47. health advocacy: 23, 27, 45, 46. health professionals: 19, 51. public
health service: 28. alcohol and drug treatment provider: 40, 50. retailer/industry group:
9, 30, 44, 52, 54. drug policy agency: 22, 33, 34, 42, 58)
It prevents the criminalisation of users (individuals: 25, 26, 43, 56, 57, 30, 22, 33.
political party: 39. retailer/industry group: 9, 30, 44, 52, 54)
It prevents exposing users to an untaxed criminal black market (individual: 25, 55, 57,
27, 45, 33. retailer/industry group: 9,30, 44, 52, 54)
It limits the shift to illegal and potentially more harmful hard drugs (ecstasy,
methamphetamine) (individuals: 25, 26, 43, researcher: 7, 47. retailer: 30, 44, 52, 53.
drug policy agency: 22, 34)
It allows people to obtain the social/therapeutic benefits of psychoactive drugs
(individual: 1, community group: 31 (partly), 30)
It limits availability (48, 42)
It limits opportunity for sale of legal products being used as a cover for sale of illicit
hard drugs (32)
It reduces the risk of wider negative economic impacts on the commercial use of BZPrelated products (private individual: 37. retailer: 52, 53).
One submitter suggested something similar to the United Kingdom where recreational
products can only be sold through pharmacy-only (19). Another submitter noted their ability to
deliver pharmacy-only sales if such a control was applied (14).
One retailer (9) and a State agency (16) wanted to see a regime similar to tobacco and
alcohol. An individual (24), a health advocacy group (27) and an organisation (34) supported
the imposition of an excise tax like tobacco and alcohol.
One industry group has submitted proposed regulations under the Misuse of Drugs Act as an
alternative to a ban including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a maximum dose per pill of 200mg and per pack of 600mg
clear and accurate labelling
BZP raw material used to be at least 99 per cent pure
no harmful ingredients
controls on manufacture
no sales of BZP raw powder to consumers
sales only from premises where entry is restricted to persons aged over 18 years or
from licensed premises excluding convenience stores or supermarkets
a ban on sales of BZP within 250 metres of a school, recreational centre or playground
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
22
•
•
•
2.8
limits on advertising to within premises BZP is sold and where entry is restricted to
persons aged over 18 years, and where product is not visible from the street
restrict advertising that overstates or glorifies the benefits of use, or suggests BZP
products are benign
require packaging health warnings including importance of drinking plenty of water, not
mixing with alcohol and not exceeding the recommended dose (61/61a).
EACD Recommendations 1, 2, 3
That BZP and all related products be classified under Schedule 3 Part 1 (Class C1) of
the MODA 1975 and consequently removed from Schedule 4 of the MOD Amendment
Act 2005.
Views supporting or opposing recommendations are summarised in table 2 below:
Table 2: Summary table regarding EACD recommendations 1, 2 and 3
Support
Individuals
Community Groups
Researcher
Health Advocacy
Public health service
Health professionals
Health professional
bodies
Drug
Treatment
Provider
DHB / Emergency
Service
Retailer / Industry
Group
Oppose
Provided
comment only
5, 6, 13, 59, 48
1, 24, 25, 26, 35, 37,
43, 55, 56, 57, 62
3, 29 ,31 (partial:5 of 31 (partial:12 of 17)
17)
4
7, 47
8/8a
23, 27, 45, 46
28
2, 20/38
12, 17, 36
19
51
18, 49
40, 50
14
10, 11 (partial: 66% in 11
(partial:
34%
favour)
opposed)
15
9, 30, 44, 52 (+ 9187
individual petitioners),
53 (+ 279 retail
petitioners),
54,
61/61a
Drug Policy / Law
22, 33, 34, 42
reform agencies
Government / State
60, 32
58
16, 21
Agency
Political Party
39
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
23
Twenty one submissions wholly supported the classification of BZP and related products. One
further submission reflected majority support for classification (where in a petition/survey 66%
of signatories / commentators supported classification).
Thirty five submissions wholly opposed classification of BZP and related products. In one
further submission, a majority of 12 out of 17 in a community group opposed classification.
Four submissions supplied information or policy advice only:
•
•
•
•
One group of researchers (8/8a) provided information only, suggesting a large
percentage of party pill users are also likely to be occasionally using illicit drugs (LSD,
ecstasy, speed, nitrous oxide, ritalin). This existing use means, therefore, that making
BZP use illicit is unlikely to result in any new swing to harder drugs.
One health professional organisation (14) offered suggestions about ways to give
better information to users should the government decide against classification and
look to an alternative control mechanisms.
One government agency (21) did not comment on the recommendation but considered
several potential outcomes with implications for enforcement and monitoring.
A further Government agency (16) considered that official advice to the EACD should
have contained a full analysis of the alternative regime.
Specific comments in relation to these views follow:
Support classification:
Two individuals (5, 46) wanted classification as the current free availability implies that
substances are “safe”. In addition, submitter 46 believes that BZP carries little stigma. An
individual writing on behalf of four school counsellors (48) concurred with these concerns and
expressed particular apprehension with respect to the impact of the legal status on youth and
children. Three further individuals (6, 13, 59) supported classification and Submitter 13 wanted
classification to be immediate.
A community group (3) wanted to bring an end to the growth in retail outlets while another (29)
wants a ban because of the negative health, psychological and social impacts of BZP use.
A submission from a research organisation (4) supported classification. A submitter which
delivers health promotion and health protection services on behalf of several DHB supports
classification (28).
A health professional (2) considered that BZP and elated substances should be banned as
they are dangerous drugs and should not be self-administered without professional oversight.
A further health professional (20/38) and three health professional bodies (12, 17, 36) also
indicated their support for classification. Submitter 36 indicated this was because BZP is a
psychoactive drug with no therapeutic value. Two alcohol and drug treatment providers (18,
49) supported classification. Submitter 49 noted that the easy access meant it was not viewed
as a drug and there was a lack of education and knowledge about the effects, side effects and
contraindications. They also noted that a number of their clients used BZP intravenously.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
24
One DHB Health Unit (11) posed two options and the majority of persons signing the petition
or providing commentary (480 of 729) supported classification. An emergency service (10)
also supported classification. A submitter representing 2,300 operators and businesses from
the hospitality industry supported the recommendation that BZP and related substances be
classified C1 (15).
A State agency (32) considered that classification will quell trans-Tasman and international
concern about New Zealand’s potential ability to become a primary supplier of BZP, will stop
party pill shops being a front for other hard drugs and may have other benefits such as
reducing potential adverse effects on driver behaviour and unpredictability when taken with
alcohol. A further State agency (60) supported classification as a measure to reduce harm to
children and young people .
Oppose classification:
One individual (1) opposed classification because his personal use had resulted in therapeutic
benefit (depressive symptoms, social phobia eased) where other treatments had failed. Two
individuals (5, 62) opposed classification because of BZP’s therapeutic benefits to them. A
group of students writing as private individuals (24) opposed classification and highlighted the
costs and resources needed for enforcement. Submitters 25 and 57 were concerned about
the criminalisation of users, whilst several submitters (25, 26, 43, 55) were worried that it may
turn users to other illicit and hard drugs. Submitter 26 also pointed out that there have been no
deaths as a result of BZP use. Another individual (35) considered regulation and associated
taxation is a more sustainable and productive means of reducing demand. An individual (37)
considered that the risk of harm is de minimus. This submitter noted the very large number of
piperazine related products used commercially (200+) and raised concerns about how these
would be affected in relation to classification. Submitters 55 and 57 suggested that users will
become involved with the un-taxed criminal black market. Submitter 57 also noted that they
had not observed ill-effects through their personal experience with people who use BZP.
Submitter 56 considered classification pointless as users will shift to another product or new
designer drugs. An individual (62) who uses a BZP product SLIMFAST as a weight reduction
tool submits that this has been successful and opposes classification.
Within one community youth group (31) the majority (12 out of 17) opposed classification as
they consider BZP has benefits for shy people.
Two researchers (7, 47) were opposed as harm had not been proven, a ban is likely to bring
a shift back to more potentially harmful substances and the availability of BZP-like compounds
were minimising the risk of greater harm. Submitter 47 noted the BZP “hangover” dissuades
continuing use.
Two health advocacy groups (23, 27) opposed classification because they consider it will not
reduce harm, it criminalises users, it removes the opportunity for quality control and because it
would introduce users to criminal elements. Submitter 27 recommended delaying a decision
until research projects currently underway have been completed, peer reviewed and
published. A further submitter representing 350 individual members and organisations
involved in youth health opposed classification on the basis of harm minimisation (45). The
majority of a further health advocacy group (46) did not favour classification.
A health professional (19) considered that the risk of harm for BZP is low level and believed
that BZP use in New Zealand explains the relatively low level of methamphetamine use in
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
25
New Zealand compared with Australia. A health professional body from British Columbia (51)
opposed classification and pointed out the harms of a prohibition approach.
Two alcohol and drug treatment services (40, 50) considered classification will not minimise
harm and risks creating harms.
The retailer/industry group submissions (9, 30, 44, 52, 54) opposed classification because it
will increase use of illegal drugs; bring young people into contact with gangs; will risk
criminalisation of young people; and will not minimise harm. A further retailer (53) was
concerned about impacts on business and the confiscation of property rights. One industry
group (61, 61a) opposes classification, noting the following points:
•
•
•
•
that a product does not have to be “safe” to avoid classification, and that BZP should
remain a restricted substance, with proper enforcement of existing regulation
that BZP may increase harm from drugs, driving supply underground, increasing risk of
improper use and use of “P” and other harmful drugs
that there is no evidence of BZP decreasing demand for methamphetamine, and
further evidence needed to determine if there is a safe dose limit
that there is a lack of proof that BZP and related substances meet the test for
“moderate harm”.
All four drug policy/law reform groups (22, 33, 34, 42) opposed classification because it will
not minimise harm, illegal use will continue and it risks exposing youth to criminal elements as
well as criminalisation of youth. A State agency (58) is also opposed to classification on the
basis that it would not minimise harm, criminalising BZP may cause more harm to young
people, and noted that the EACD recommendation does not consider the increased
operational costs to Customs, Police and Justice. The political party (39) opposes
classification and points out the disadvantages of prohibition such as the establishment of a
black market; disrespect for the law; serious disproportionate harm to individuals and society
via criminalisation.
2.9
EACD Recommendation 4
That work continues to further develop the regulatory framework and enforcement
capacity that would support the restricted substances provisions of the MOD
Amendment Act 2005
Note: many submitters that supported further work made suggestions that are referred to
under the discussion on alternative regulation above.
One individual (13) supported the suggestion for further work.
A researcher (47)
recommended better utilisation of present provisions of category D and considered these
provisions had not been sufficiently used to mitigate harm and that there has been inadequate
enforcement of the age restrictions. This view of inadequate enforcement is shared by another
individual (43), two health advocacy groups (23, 46), and the public health service (26). One
health professional body also wanted to see enforcement strengthened before other nontherapeutic psychoactive substances reached the marketplace to fill the BZP void (36).
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
26
One state agency (58) supported retention within the current regulatory regime with further
development. A further state agency (60) supports further work on the regulatory framework
and enforcement capacity to strategically deal with future substances that may be introduced
to the market.
A health professional body (17) was opposed to creating a legal market for psychoactive
drugs as it could release an unknown number of little-understood compounds including those
used by indigenous cultures as well as designer drugs.
Three retailers (30, 44, 54) supported tougher regulations covering sale, manufacture and
promotion and believed the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act allows for this. A further retailer
supported regulation similar to alcohol and tobacco (9). Another retailer (44) wanted to see
the current STANZ Code of Practice made compulsory through regulation, instead of being
voluntary.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
27
3.
Database of comments made by submitters
This section of the report presents the views of submitters in some detail. Views are
presented in a table format, firstly on the basis of comments made by submitters on each of
the drug classification criteria (section 4B of the Misuse of Drugs Act refers) that the EACD
considers when making its recommendations. These are:
•
The likelihood or evidence of drug abuse, including such matters as the prevalence of
the drug, levels of consumption, drug seizures trends, and the potential appeal to
vulnerable populations.
•
The specific effects of the drug, including pharmacological, psychoactive, and
toxicological effects
•
The risks, if any, to public health
•
The therapeutic value of the drug, if any
•
The potential for use of the drug to cause death
•
The ability of the drug to create physical of psychological dependence
•
The international classification and experience of the drug in other jurisdictions
•
Any other matters for consideration that the Minister may consider relevant.
Further tables present the views of submitters on the EACD’s specific recommendations to the
Minister:
•
EACD Recommendations 1 and 3: that BZP be classified under Schedule 3 Part 1
(Class C1) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 and consequently removed from Schedule
4 of the MOD Amendment Act 2005 in order that it no longer be a restricted substance
•
EACD Recommendation 2: that the classification as a Class C1 drug should cover all
known analogues and derivatives of benzylpiperazine that have no known therapeutic
use
•
EACD Recommendation 4: that work continues to further develop the regulatory
framework and enforcement capacity that would support the restricted substances
provisions of the MODA Amendment Act 2005.
Finally, the tables present views submitted on a number of cross-cutting issues raised by
submitters.
A reasonable degree of detail has been included to ensure that all key points made by
submitters have been presented for consideration.
Note that there is a degree of overlap between the topic areas chosen for the coding of views.
This means that, for example, in some cases views could be presented under two or more
drug classification criteria. We have attempted to present each point made by submitters
once, and under the most relevant criterion.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
28
3.1
The likelihood and evidence of drug abuse
Context
The EACD considered BZP:
•
•
•
•
•
is widely available, accessible and actively marketed
is widely used
is used with alcohol
is included with other preparations such as dieting agents
appears to be targeted to under 18year olds.
Submission
number
Position2
Response to likelihood and evidence of drug abuse
INDIVIDUALS
2
5
Support
37
Oppose
43
48
Oppose
Support
Submitter is concerned that lack of controls implies that party pills are safe and OK. Ready availability in malls and
normal shopping areas is indicating acceptability and is increasing availability to a wider group of young people.
Submitter considers if fewer pills were available there would be less use. In support of this argument she
commented that when nitrous oxide became less accessible the number of canisters littering doorways reduced
and a positive effect was seen within the community
Submitter uses definition of substance abuse, which he says is the standard definition used in health for the
purposes of diagnosis, to note that despite the widespread use of PBST’s there is little evidence of substance
abuse. Using data supplied by distributors, submitter indicates that manufacturers and the SHORE report has
calculated that sales peaked in early 2006 and have perhaps declined slightly with a current weekly use of
approximately 125,000 pills on 50,000 occasions. He has calculated PBST use from 2000 to 2007 as being 24
million pills, consumed by 400,000 persons in NZ on 9.5 million occasions thereby equating with 1.2 million person
years of use. Yet there are no documented deaths or record of permanent harm.
Submitter notes that reputable suppliers do not sell to those under 18.
Submitters (4 school counsellors) believe that several of their most challenging students are regularly using BZP,
often along with alcohol and cannabis. This is particularly noticeable amongst 9 and 10 year old males. As a result,
these students, who receive little supervision outside of school, are failing their courses and wagging. BZP related
pills appear to be easily obtained by students with anecdotal evidence recording vendors setting up shop in public
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
29
Submission
number
Position2
29
Support
31
Split view
8 / 8A
47
Comment
only
Oppose
27
Oppose
45
Oppose
28
Support
2
Support
Response to likelihood and evidence of drug abuse
locations such as a children’s park.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Submitter notes that as alcohol is on offer at parties, it is inevitable that alcohol and party pills will be used together
thus exacerbating social behavioural problems.
LG community youth group recognises the widespread availability and supports additional controls that would limit
times and places that product can be sold. They suggest having the pills available for open sale at “gigs” but not
available for formal sale where alcohol is the main recreational stimulant in use e.g. New Year.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Draft report provided by the submitter shows results of research (survey of first year students) suggesting BZP use
in the sample group surveyed is more popular than all illicit substances except cannabis.
Submitter (a researcher and adviser in alcohol/drug addiction and treatment and specialist clinical psychologist)
expresses concern about the sale to minors noting the Wilkins survey that reports 16% of 15-17 year olds and 3%
of 13-14 year olds used party pills. Survey also found that 25% of those under 20 had never been asked for age
identification whilst over 50% had only been asked sometimes. Of the 17 respondents aged under 17, 75% had
been asked either sometimes only or never.
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (a research and policy foundation) agrees that there is widespread use including use by those under 18
years. This widespread use should be able to provide an evidence-based approach to evaluate the balance of
benefits and harm.
Submitter (umbrella network of youth workers and youth groups) agree there is widespread use amongst youth and
that BZP use is part of normal risk-taking among adolescents.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
Submitter (with health promotion experience) notes concern of liquor licensees that BZP is an increasing problem
on liquor premises. Submitter considers there is a link between binge drinking and the consumption of BZPs as this
accentuates the effect of BZP but it also increases the risk of harm to the user. Information received from within the
alcohol and drug treatment workforce is that repeated BZP use has the ability to create dependence. As many
individuals only use BSP because of its legal status, its removal from the legal market would reduce use. Submitter
concedes a black market would continue, however.
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter (medical practitioner and cardiac specialist) refers to paper (Austin & Monasterio 2004) describing an
acute psychotic episode in an individual after ingesting Rapture with small quantities of cannabis and nitrous oxide.
Refers also to paper (Wikstrom, Holmgren & Ahlner 2004) where BZP was identified in several forensic autopsies
including 11 prison cases.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
30
Submission
number
19
Position2
Oppose
20
Support
36
Support
50
Oppose
44
Oppose
Response to likelihood and evidence of drug abuse
Submitter (emergency specialist and sub-specialist in addiction) considers that whatever decision is made about
BZP it will only be replaced by some other substance. In his experience the effects of intoxication are mild and he
considers the stimulating effect and increased mental alertness may have protective benefits. (References Beasley
et al reporting improved driving performance.) Found in his own experience users and patients when interviewed
while intoxicated have been oriented and co-operative unlike those intoxicated with alcohol.
Submitter (ED practitioner) is concerned that widespread availability has led to use by high school students and
accidental ingestion by toddlers. Submitter addresses claims that legislation to regulate would be an infringement of
personal and democratic rights by doubting whether these are rights as detailed in the NZ Bill of Rights 1990.
Refers to right ‘not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation’ suggesting that the encouraging of the
public to consume 20 million doses of BZP without establishing evidence of safety constitutes a large scientific
experiment. On the issues of risk versus benefit, the submitter notes that sport involves risk but offers considerable
health and social benefit. BZP consumption does not offer any substantive or unequivocal positive health benefit but
only negative health outcomes for families and the wider community
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter (representative of 3000 pharmacies) is concerned at the ready availability of party pills sold as dietary
supplements. Accepts the EACD view that BZPs possess a moderate risk of harm, especially when taken with
alcohol.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Submitter (largest provider of drug treatment, counselling and training services in Auckland area) does not endorse
any drug use. Prevalence estimates for the Auckland region suggest that in any 12 month period up to 62,332
people suffer from diagnosable substance disorders and up to 234,758 will consume alcohol in a harmful manner.
Those seeking treatment is estimated at 8,190 people for the Auckland region across 12 months. Data suggest
most attend because of alcohol or cannabis use, to a lesser degree methamphetamine. The service has not had
anyone seek help for BZP and related substances alone even though 1.5 - 2million tablets have been manufactured
for one of NZ major distributors since 2001 (MOH 2003). Submitter considers that availability of BZP and related
substances appears to have reduced the demand for substances like methamphetamine and that P use is no longer
‘accepted’ or condoned in circles where BZP is deemed (and experienced as) a safer alternative. Submitter notes
that some young people use BZP instead of alcohol as they see the harms with alcohol use to be far greater.
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter (retailer located in downtown Auckland for 10 years, retails BZP-based legal party pills and is a member
of STANZ) Retailer applies a minimum age of 18 years old. Notes that party pills are used by a wide range of
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
31
Submission
number
Position2
54
Oppose
61 & 61a
Oppose
Response to likelihood and evidence of drug abuse
people and believes that use has reduced the prevalence of more harmful drugs such as alcohol and
methamphetamine. States that the extent of repeat business suggests an enjoyable and relatively safe high..
Submitter agrees BZP is widely used and accessible but does not accept they are actively marketed due to
regulations prohibiting TV radio, print and periodical advertising. Submitter point out that Wilkins survey suggests
that 67.2% drank the same or less alcohol. Submitter considers the NZFSA has stopped the use of BZP as a dieting
agent by visiting the manufacturers. Does not accept that those under 18 years are being targeted and suggests
use may result from inadequate policing of retailers.
Party pills containing BZP, TFMPP and other legal piperazines have been legal in New Zealand for years. There are
estimates that 400,000 New Zealanders have tried them (reference to Massey University survey, 2006), 300,000 in
the last year, and 50,000 in any given week, and that 24 million party pills containing BZP have been consumed in
New Zealand.
Submits there is no new evidence on drug abuse (through BZP) since the 2004 report, and it has not been proven
that BZP “poses a moderate risk of harm”.
Massey University survey and Auckland University report provide evidence that 2.5 to 2.6 pills is the average
dosage taken, in former study around 70% of users take two or less pills on a typical occasion.
A ConsumerLink survey (commissioned by STANZ) shows that 95.6% of respondents (who have taken illegal
drugs) were not influenced to take illegal drugs by legal party pills.
Submits prevalence of BZP use is strong evidence of social acceptability in NZ, that availability has no bearing on
likelihood of abuse, and abuse can best be controlled by regulation under the MDAA.
58
Oppose
60
Support
Notes EACD comment no guarantee change in status will reduce BZP use and banning imports may drive
production underground and increase cost without decreasing supply.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter (youth policy advisers) notes the widespread use of BZP by young adults. Whilst concern about possibility
of use by underage youth, recent studies show that underage usage rates are less than that for alcohol and
comparable to cannabis.
Refers to the SHORE study (Massey University, 2006) that despite current restrictions on sale to people aged under
18 they appear to have easy access to BZP.
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
32
3.2
The pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
Context
The EACD considered BZP:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
is an amphetamine like substance with significant stimulant effects.
represents less risk than controlled substances: less risk than methamphetamine and equivalent to ephedrine
offers no perceived benefits
has adverse effects – may be result of piperazines other than BZP
may have slow onset effect and lead to overuse
is unknown in terms of long term effects
trials show adverse effects
use has potential for toxicity in some individuals
use with alcohol and drugs makes effects difficult to predict.
Submission
number
Position3
13
Support
37
Oppose
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter considers that the effects and potential harm of use of BZP are unknown and therefore supports
restrictions and classification to be put in place immediately.
Submitter (risk and policy analyst personal submission developed from information obtained on work paid for by
STANZ) has analysed available information on the use of and risks associated with piperazine based social tonics
(PBST), including an analysis on selected research on PDST’s and formed a view on the magnitude of risk
relative to accepted risk according to a range of risk magnitude models. Information included confidential
information provided by various stakeholders and obtained under the Official Information Act. The submitter
concludes that PBST’s pose a level of risk of permanent harm less than flying a modern commercial airliner,
about the same as being struck by lightning and that using PBST’s according to instructions is safer than eating
peanut butter, swimming, kayaking, smoking, drinking alcohol and using most common medications. Submitter
notes that anything that people eat can cause adverse reactions – by any objective measure.
Submitter considers that key evidence used by the EACD is false or incomplete and presented in a biased
manner as to effectively be false. He is particularly concerned with the studies from the National Poisons centre
3
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
33
Submission
number
Position3
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
(NPC) and the medical Research Institute of NZ (MRINZ). The submitter recommends a formal audit of this latter
work.
Submitter is concerned that EACD had not defined moderate risk and has not undertaken a formal risk
assessment of BZP and TFMPP and the many (200+) other piperazines that it [unknowingly] recommends be
banned.
Submitter gives extensive discussion on the accepted ways of defining risk and evidence based risk assessment.
Examples provided include: Qualitative measure of likelihood of the Australian Geomechanics society 2000; the
Ministry of Justice risk magnitude model used for assessing level of monitoring of criminals; the UK chief medical
officer, Prof Calman, paper on describing magnitude of risk 1996, the NZ Food Safety Authority decision making
assessment; the earthquake severity criteria.
Submitter calculates that 24 million pills have been consumed by 400,000 people in NZ on 9.5 million occasions
representing 1.2 million person years of use. (using data supplied by distributors, manufacturers and the SHORE
report).
On this basis the submitter suggests the reported seizures are within background levels that existed
before the rise in use of PBST’s. Cases of psychosis are also within background levels.
Submitter has considered hospital ED admissions in seeking to measure evidence of risk and argues:
• CHCH ED issues appear to be confined to CHCH and suggests unique market distortions relating to dose
amounts and presentation in CHCH. Amounts per pill (Gee et al) ranged form 70-700mg. 110 gm
sachets have been obtained in the South Island market. Industry data suggests SI pill doses are on
average 50% higher than NI. High doses were withdrawn from the market in CHCH in early 2006.
Number of presentations in CHCH has declined by over 50% during 2006.
• Auckland ED have no particular concerns; doses increased between 2004 and 2006 from an average of
75 mg to 110mg per pill due to non-compliance with STANZ code of practice; St John’s ambulance in
Auckland confirmed that PBST’s impact minimally on their services (personal comm.); with the increased
popularity of PBST’s at the Big day Out there were fewer problems associated with illicit drug;1% of adult
ED presentation in Auckland are due to seizures (about 500 per year); None of those have been related
to PBST use; 1 patient was admitted in 2004 following BPST use but not for seizures.
• Waikato (Nicholson 2006) paper is not on any documented adverse events associated with PBST but
documents use of patients, family and friends of people passing through the ED.
• National Poisons Centre documented 73 case reports form ED’s over 2 years that did not include illicit
drugs but most included alcohol use; 7 cases were reported where the dose of PBST was documented
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
34
Submission
number
Position3
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
and the person stated no alcohol or illicit drug consumption; Oct 2002 – 2006 the NPC received 294
poisoning related enquires concerning PBST’s representing 0.2% of all calls ;calls are not evidence of
poisoning, calls spiked after media interest; Nov 2006 NPC reports 121 of PBPD poisoning. 18
eliminated as not ingested PBPD but other legal drug. Of the 103 remaining 27% had ingested PBPD
alone 45% had also ingested ethanol, 29% co-ingested other drugs (MDMA,NOS or marijuana).
Submitter queries the NPC claim that 27% of the study groups had taken less than or equal to the
‘recommended dose’ because dose data on only 22 out of 73 and only two were reported below the
industry recommended maximum 200mg. Both had a dangerously high blood ethanol concentration. Ie
where dose was known 20 out of 22 were ABOVE industry recommended doses. Submitter considers
this error to be significant as NPC advised a ban on BZP claiming 27% had consumed the
recommended amount. Submitter says only 9% (2) had and both had blood alcohol levels between
13-15 times the legal blood alcohol limit. The next 2 lowest doses which would have been within the
industry maximum for BZP also had blood ethanol 16 and 7.5 times the legal level. Submitter concludes
that using NPC data there are no documented cases where the dose is known, where the dose is within
the industry maximum of 200mg BZP except for 2 cases where blood alcohol levels were extremely high.
Potential for harm: submitter says that no causality assessment has been undertaken and hence it is not
possible to claim the PBST’s actually cause the various effects attributed to use. Submitter notes following
injection of 3million doses of MeNZP vaccine there were 60 reported seizures and officials claimed this was no
evidence of causality as the background rate of seizures had not increased. Using the same argument there has
been no increase in background rate of seizures in the age groups that commonly use PBST so no evidence that
seizures are due to PBST use. Submitter notes there are 16 hospital admissions each year due to peanut/nut
use.
Safe defined as relative absence of harm. Using models for prioritising risk management policy and resources
developed from a variety of references including NZ Food Safety Authority, Health Canada, Harvard University
school of Public Health and the French Aeronautic, submitter concludes that the model would describe the
magnitude of harm as de minimus and within the tolerable range.
rd
Submitter refers to EU risk analysis (EU Risk Assessment Report; piperazine (2005) 3 priority list 56,pp166)
which found that in general piperazine represented a low order of toxicity when used in recommended dose of
100 mg/kg for adults and 50-65 mg/kg in children for up to 7 days; that neurotoxic effects including muscular
weakness, unsteadiness, lack of co-ordination, hypotonia, diminished tendon reflexes, but also tremor, clonic
spasms, dysarthia, diffuse EEG disturbances, mental hallucinations have been observed. It notes these occur
rarely and are reversible.
Submitter also notes that piperazine is considered sufficiently safe by Codex Alimentarius and adopted as an
approved food flavouring.
Submitter: comments on the use of piperazine (citrate and adipate slats) as an anthelmintic; notes its continued
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
35
Submission
number
Position3
43
Oppose
48
Support
57
Oppose
31
Spit view
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
use in many countries for children under 2years-old; observes that despite 50 years of extensive research and
use in humans, and research of a wide range of animals including cats, dogs, cattle, pigs, chickens, horses,
elephants, mice, guinea pigs, lions and tigers the EU still expresses concern as to the lack of certainty in
establishing Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level.
Submitter comments on key papers:
NPC letter (Harnett ). Submitter makes 17 points from that letter some of those points are (a) concern that the
word abuse is used instead of use, (b) the failure to recognise seizure rates are same as background rates (see
above), (c) the US error in scheduling based on BZP being 10-20 times more potent than dexamphetamine
when it should have used 1/13th (d) the errors in analysis of the 73 reports of PBPD poisoning from ED see above
(e)symptoms of PBST poisoning are nebulous and could equally be due to food poisoning, excess alcohol, virus
infections or a plethora of other conditions (f) 15% evidence of seizures is low and amounts to .10% of all seizure
admissions in the period (g) dispute over the average number of pills taken (g) statements about seizure may
occur at recommended doses cannot be substantiated as dose was only known in 1/11 seizure cases and that
one had consumed 400mg sachet – a high risk source of PBST.
Analysis of the Gee Dec 2005 paper: submitter queries the quality of peer review noting incorrect reference to
Stack. Submitter considers there is a good analysis of the Gee paper in the application to the Ethics Committee
by Prof Beasley’s for the MRINZ Study and encloses a copy of the letter.
Analysis of the MRINZ study: Submitter considers the MRINZ analysis shows that causality regarding the reported
seizures and BZP use was uncertain and had not been established. The MIRINZ says that Nicholson provided no
reference of a link between BZP use and seizures. Submitter notes neither did the Theron study. Submitter notes
that the MRINZ letter does make one error as reputable manufacturers have not recommended a total dose of
300mg since PBST’s were introduced in 2000. Up until 2004 average doses were 75mg and increased to about
110 in 2005. Reputable manufacturers have not recommended 300mg of BZP per dose, certainly not mixed with
74mg of TFMPP, 40mg of caffeine and other herbal products as given to the subjects by MRINZ. The submitter
calls for an audit of the MRINZ study and lists 30 points that should be considered in such an audit.
Submitter considers adverse effects are not sufficient for a ban when compared with harm of alcohol and states
the risk associated with BZP use is lower than that of methamphetamine.
Submitters (4 school counsellors) consider BZP is potentially harmful when consumed by immature adolescents
and mixed with other mind-altering substances.
Submitter notes that research by Gee at Christchurch has raised some serious concerns but that similar research
at Auckland produced less worrying results.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
LG community youth group recognises party pills used with alcohol can be dangerous and can damage brain
development in young people. Although there is not enough information about long term effects, the majority of
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
36
Submission
number
Position3
4
Support
7
Oppose
47
Oppose
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
the youth group consider any issues should be handled through better regulation rather than by making the
product illegal.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitter comments that BZP and other analogues and derivatives are psychoactive drugs with potential for
abuse. Supports need for research but is concerned that it would take too long to obtain evidence on effects.
Considers all such psychoactive drugs should be subjected to assessment and regulatory approval as required for
similar pharmaceutical agents.
The submitters say they have researched every available piece of published data and acknowledge there is very
little known about these compounds. They are undertaking a number of clinical studies including trials on human
participants in an attempt to assess the acute and long-term effects of BZP and TFMPP. They consider BZP has
amphetamine- like stimulant effects’ (Bye et al 1973, Campbell 1973 and own studies) but they have no evidence
on TFMPP suggesting harm. Instead, in the US, the sale of TFMPP is legal. Submitters raise concern about the
accuracy, misinterpreting and misrepresentation of the facts of some recent studies. They note that the US Drug
Enforcement Agency (DEA) made its decision on incorrect information about the potency of BZP. The submitters
comment on the studies conducted within NZ Hospitals, As the Gee prospective study relies on self-reporting
(which has a tendency to under-report the use of illicit drugs) it does not adequately address the potential for
seizures as a result of co-ingestion with other non-reported recreational drugs. (Gee et al 2005) To illustrate this,
the SHORE report involved phoning 2010 participants and found 94% of party pill users co-ingested alcohol
compared with Gee et al who identified only 49%. Submitters conclude either alcohol protects against BZPinduced toxicity or the Gee patients under reported. The SHORE report found only 0.4% of respondents had
been admitted to hospital in relation to their party pill use in the previous 12 months. Considering link with alcohol
use, reported side effects could all have been attributed to alcohol. In the survey of Waikato Hospital patients,
families and visitors, the rates of co-ingestion with alcohol is significantly lower than with the SHORE report but
this is because the sample used, which included ages from 14 to 97 years, was not representative of party pill
users). (Nicholson et al (2006))
Submitter (a researcher and adviser in alcohol/drug addiction and treatment and specialist clinical psychologist)
has commented on Thompson et al which he considered appeared to have caused the greatest concern with
regard to the safety of piperazines.
Submitter queries the validity of this trial because: Participants were given a total dose (300mg BZP,) which is
more than the maximum recommended for 4/8 pills on the market and equates to the maximum recommended
4/8 common products (300-360);Total dose of TFMPP 74mg was given which is comparable to 3/6 maximum
recommended dose of 50-100 and more than the recommended maximum of the remainder 3/6; Only one product
on the market (Rapture) recommends a maximum dose of BZP/TFMPP combined comparable to that used in the
trial; The 4 pills taken is twice the median number typically taken recreationally as reported by the participants and
is slightly less than the number (5) taken recreationally by the participants largest ever use occasion with some
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
37
Submission
number
Position3
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
participants reporting that they had never taken more than 2 pills; The dose used in the trial departs form product
recommendations and departs from recreational practice.
In summary: participants were required to take a dose that for the majority was more than their usual dose and for
some more than they had ever taken; there was no discretion to not take the second two pills even though
surveys show this is not average user behaviour; the total dosage was at the higher end of industry
recommendations and the pills were ingested on a very empty stomach with the first food intake provided four
hours after drug administration. This behaviour is not in keeping with Wilkins research. Submitter notes that the
authors in the paper describe the research protocol “as per industry recommended guidelines for party pill
consumption’ and says this is an incorrect assertion. Similarly the same statement on industry guidelines with
regard to use with food intake was not in keeping with industry guidelines.
Submitter queries the degree of seriousness of the side effects noted in the Thompson et al trial where 7/17
with or without alcohol are reported to have experienced severe adverse events compared with none experienced
by the 18 who did not take BZP/TFMPP. Severe reactions included agitation, anxiety, hallucinations, confusion,
vomiting insomnia, headaches and migraine. Adverse symptoms were identified 10 hrs after dose or at a followup appointment 1 week later when delayed side effects were reported. Severity was identified (i) using
standardised rating of clinical research adverse events (mild/moderate/severe) and through patients self
assessment. Submitter notes there are no details about guidance given to participants as to what “severe” means
or if any such advice was given. Nor is there any information on how many of the 7 severe ratings were based on
this rather ambiguous self –rating rather than the defined Clinical Research Adverse Events guidelines. In
summary the submitter notes a large minority of the participants ingesting a high dose of BZP/TFMPP on an
empty stomach did experience unpleasant side effects. He says that despite the use of the term “severe” in
relation to these effects it is not possible to draw any firm conclusions as to clinical severity and significance of
these experiences. He says this because the majority of adverse events reported were delayed and constitute
what Thompson et al have noted are commonly referred to as “bad hangovers’. Submitter notes these effects
may cause many users to limit or cease their party pill use as indicated by the findings of Wilkins et al.
Submitter suggests that frequency of adverse events needs to be considered in the context of frequency of use.
Submitter says the Wilkins survey gives a good indication of user behaviour and that the 2 most striking findings
are (i) the large number that have tired party pills (20% had tried and 15% in the past year) and (ii) the
infrequency of the use (46% 1-2 times, 73% up to 5 times, 6% weekly or more). From this rate of use the
submitter extrapolates that in the year before April 2006 and based on population data of those in the age group
(13-45) 10 million pills had been taken during 4 million episodes. In the context of this estimated use submitter
considers the frequency of adverse events (in keeping with Theron et al) party pills are having only a minor impact
on overdose admissions (1.6%). Gee reports on 80 admissions with 15 toxic seizures in a 5 month period.
Submitter estimates these events occurred in a population that has used 140,000 doses. Submitter notes more
recent data of Gee (following the 2005 amendment to MODA) show a reduction in the rate of ED presentation and
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
38
Submission
number
Position3
23
Oppose
27
Oppose
45
Oppose
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
in the proportion experiencing seizures. He also notes that the findings of Gee et al indicate that the great
majority of BZP-related ED admissions symptoms were not serious.
The submitter poses the question as to how many admissions, either fewer or more serious, would have occurred
if BZP were illegal. Submitter also comments on the finding of Wilkins which suggest a very a high percentage
(61%) stopped use and the submitter suggests the side effects could be limiting the use.
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (youth group Wellington) notes SHORE finding that only 1% of those surveyed had visited an ED and
0.4% had been admitted to a hospital because of party pill use. Submitter notes that although the MRINZ study
was terminated on the grounds of patient safety, the dose used was more than that recommended by STANZ.
Submitter also notes that risk of seizure which may be due to polydrug use and further considers that IV use can
be minimised by restricting sale of powder.
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) notes research has
established side effects of BZP products including the continuation of desired stimulating effects longer than a
reasonable time or stronger than anticipated effects. Submitter notes some adverse events may be due to nonBZP constituents of party pills and have seen clear evidence of some serious cases adverse effects as reported
by Gee. Submitter is of the view that the evidence shows the negative effects are mainly low-level and represent a
very small proportion of BZP doses consumed as shown by Theron et al and Wilkins. Submitter notes that
researchers have not established a dose-response relationship between level of BZP and likelihood of seizure or
serious effect nor is it known what is a “safe dose”. Therefore the attempt to standardise product and dosage and
the effects of co-ingestion with alcohol as in the study by MRINZ is important. Submitters notes the high rates of
adverse events in this study are at variance with population studies.
Submitter (umbrella network of youth workers and youth groups) report that from their experience and interviews
with drug treatment services that there have been few, if any, adverse effects reported with young people and
party pills. Submitter has reviewed SHORE study and noted although adverse effects were reported only 1% of
users had visited an emergency department whilst only 0.4% had been admitted to a hospital because of party pill
use. Noted that Theron et al found ill effects of party pills were low compared with other legal and illegal drugs:
61% of all overdose admissions were for alcohol; 6% for GHB and only 1.6% for party pills. Notes MRINZ results
of 40% of those taking party pill alone and 43% using both party pill and alcohol had adverse effects with these
results warranting the stopping of research on grounds of patient safety. Gee et al 2005 noted 61 people
presenting to the emergency department on 80 occasions with 15 toxic seizures noted and two cases requiring
intensive care. Having reviewed this evidence, submitter poses the question as to whether reclassification is
going to manage the listed risks and whether party pill use represented a lower risk than alcohol use.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
39
Submission
number
Position3
2
Support
19
Oppose
20
Support
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter (medical practitioner and heart specialist) supports the need for greater control of BZP and similar party
pills because they have substantial physiologic effects on body and mind and are dangerous. As such party pills
should be used under professional supervision and not self administered with the risk of use with other toxic
substances like alcohol. Greater control is also needed because party pills consist of substances with a narrow
toxic window and users risk dystonia, seizures, severe respiratory and metabolic acidosis and acute psychosis.
The submitter refers to Gee study (see sub 20) which describes 61 patients presenting to Christchurch hospital 15
with toxic seizures two of which had life threatening toxicity. Cases presented included grand-mal and continuous
seizures, severe respiratory metabolic acidosis and acute psychosis. The submitter considers that these events
even if treated are likely to lead to permanent lifetime abnormalities with premature death. Submitter notes
chemical effects of combined BZP/TFMP in brain is similar to methamphetamine (ref NIDA, Baltimore) suggesting
that BZP and TFMP individually should be regarded to be as dangerous as “P”.
Submitter (emergency medical specialist) accepts seizure as the most significant side effect established and is to
be expected as all medications that increase synaptic levels of nor-adrenaline will lead to seizures. The risk of
seizure with BZP is related to the dose. Submitter considers that in the majority of observed seizure cases, users
have taken in excess of 3 times the recommended dose. Submitter acknowledges BZP will increase the risk of
seizures for users with epilepsy. Submitter considers the reports of hallucination and panic attacks are probably
related to TFMPP. Submitter suggests BZP should be considered against the alternative recreational substances
and provides a table of comparison of substance with maximal harm: Alcohol - Death (as a direct result); Opiates
- Death (as a direct result); Meth-amphetamine- Psychosis; MDMA (Ecstasy) Water intoxicant (hyponatraemia); LSD – Psychosis; Cannabis - Neurosis (anxiety disorder); Cocaine - Heart
Attack, Death.
Submitter notes there is no such thing as a safe drug or medication. All have side effects and consequences in
overdose. Use of any pharmaceutically active substance accepts that some individuals will: Have significant side
effect; Deliberately take an overdose; Will develop dependency for the substance either mentally or physically;
Have their lives adversely affected
Submitter (ED physician) Chch hospital considers there has been a measurable rate of side effects both moderate
and severe and based on current patterns at CHCH expects to see at least 2 life-threatening cases/deaths per
annum if BZP use continues at current rates. He argues all psychoactive substances disrupt normal neurological
functions and that the margin between reversible/side effects and permanent damage can be slim or
unpredictable. In support of this position the submitter provides a summary of current human and animal
research on the effects of BZP viz: Five out of 6 reported mild to severe side effects including toxic convulsions
toxic psychosis, 1 renal failure, I hypothermia, 2 of the toxic cases required life support or intensive care. Two
studies note similarity of effects to dexamphetamine (references Campbell et al 1973, Bye et al 1973, Austin et al
2004, Gee et al 2005 (see submission 17), Alansari et al 2006 (see sub 17), Nicholson 2006); Two published (
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
40
Submission
number
Position3
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
Brennan et al (MA), Meririnne et al 2006) animal studies confirmed biochemical basis for the addictive properties
of BZP and one NZ survey (Wilkins “ SHORE” report 2006) conservatively estimated 2% addiction rate in
existing users; One animal study shows that BZP induces chronic mood/anxiety disorder in rats exposed to BZP
as adolescents Aitchison and Hughes 2006; Three further unpublished studies (Gee et al (see submission 38),
Beasley(? Typographical error Thompson et al) NZ Herald article 2007, Harnett (no date NZ Poison Centre); 2
further cases of BZP related toxicity requiring intensive care for multi-organ failure remain (one requiring life
support for 19 days) hospitalised greater than 30 days post exposure.
Submitter is concerned about the effects of combination with alcohol (rate up to 91%), marijuana, prescription and
other illegal drugs and is of the view that such behaviour is unavoidable. Submitter is of the view this represents
high levels of adverse reaction and if observed with prescription medicine would lead to the drug being withdrawn.
This submitter includes a rebuttal of statements attributed to party pill advocates. Statements rebutted are:
“Herbal highs are safe and natural” (no reference). Submitter comments that BZP is a synthetic substance that
does not occur naturally and it has a definite pattern of toxicity the allusion to herbal basis is perpetuated through
herbal additives placed in BZP capsules; “STANZ offers a full safety code for party pills”. (STANZ press release
11 Feb 2007) submitter comments that this statement has 2 main problems as BZP is inherently toxic and once
sold end-user behaviour cannot be controlled. BZP is specifically designed to disturb brain function. Toxicity
relies on the dose and the biological uniqueness of the individual. Large dose may provide euphoria but also
seizures, collapse, hallucinations, psychosis, kidney failure, prolonged vomiting, headache and anxiety attacks.
Certain people may be particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of BZP even at small doses such as the one
person that had a seizure after taking I BZP pill and 9 others suffered epileptiform convulsion after taking the
recommended two tablets; ”…commentary from opponents has failed to grasp this essential fact: BZP is the
safe alternative to P” (STANZ press release 11 Feb 2007) – Submitter refers again to the Aitchison, Brennan
and Meririnne work and says from the submitters clinical experience BZP is probably not as addictive as
methamphetamine but does possess the biochemical and pharmacological properties to make it mildly
psychologically and physically addictive ;“”BZP was designed as a stimulant which – unlike p- is not addictive and
does not provoke violent or criminal behaviour” (STANZ press release 11 Feb 2007). Submitter refutes the
accuracy of this statement noting: (i) Austin description of a patient becoming psychotic with BZP use (ii) “sex
attack due to party pills’ the Press Jan 18 2007 (iii) “police seek link to stabbing …..after fight erupted in a
Colombo St party pill shop” Press 29 Sep 2006 (iv) “party pills linked to injured teen girl” – Press 17 March 2007.
On the matter of addictive nature notes 2 published ( Brennan et al (MA), Meririnne et al 2006) animal studies
confirmed biochemical basis for the addictive properties of BZP and one NZ survey (Wilkins “ SHORE” report
2006) conservatively estimated 2% addiction rate in existing users; “STANZ has prepared a Code of Good
Manufacturing Practice……..”(STANZ press release 11 Feb 2007). Submitter comments that the code has not
prevented retailers selling more than 5 times the recommended 200mg dose package or selling BZP in powder
form (more easily injected) and has not prevented the 150+ cases of BZP intoxication seen at CHCH hospital to
date; “Comparative Risk of Legal Part Pill, Alcohol and Illegal Drugs’ a survey conducted by Consumer Link
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
41
Submission
number
38
Position3
Support
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
and commissioned by STANZ. Two hundred 18-29 year olds were opinion polled on alcohol, legal party pill and
illegal drug use. The sample was selected to have the highest weighting for party pill users with 41% reporting
experience with party piles and 54% reporting illicit psychoactive drug use. The summary results are claimed to
suggest that legal party pills: (produce fewer adverse health effects than alcohol (ii) are less likely to result in
physical injury (iii) are much less likely to provoke aggressive behaviour (iv) are not identified with traffic accidents
(v) create fewer issues of dependency or loss of control. The submitter queries the accuracy of these results
because no statistical methodology is described and no margin of error stated. The submitter has calculated the
maximum margin of error (95% confidence) to be +/- 6.9% for questions asked of the entire sample and +/-17.8%
of questions of the party pill consumer group. The submitter considers this margin of error renders almost all of
the questions as not statistically significant. Therefore the answers are unreliable in representing the views of this
highly selected survey group; ‘Party pills are already safer than most of the alternatives, including alcohol’
(STANZ press release 11 Feb 2007). Submitter challenges this statement as it is made in the absence of human
studies and discounts the reported drug death of a person who had ingested BZP and MDMA together. The
submitter notes that CHCH hospital is currently caring for two patients (see earlier reference) who have been in
prolonged comas. Concerns are growing that both these cases may have permanent neurological damage. (i) A
patient took unknown quantities of BZP and tested positive for cogentin (prescription medicine) but no alcohol or
other drugs. The patient is still an inpatient 30 days after initial exposure. The long-term outcome is unclear. (ii)
involves a young adult ingesting a named brand of BZP and possibly ‘other drugs’. No alcohol or other drugs
were detected and there has been prolonged coma, hyperthermia, renal failure, liver damage and clotting
disorder. Further toxicology tests are being conducted – results pending. Patient was on a respirator in intensive
care for 19 days and is still rehabilitating 25 days post exposure.
Submitters (ED physician, ED Registrar, Nurse researcher, 2 toxicologists (section head and senior scientist))
present an ad hoc analysis of data collected in the course of a study into patients with toxicity from BZP party pills
and analysed the effects of co- ingestion. The study is funded by the National Drug Policy Unit. Paper provides
initial results. Data collection is due to finish in April 2007. Final results, discussion and conclusions may vary
depending on data collected after Oct 2006. Aim of the study: to examine the correlation between seizure,
plasma BZP level and alcohol co-ingestion on common BZP induced symptoms. Background: The widespread
use of BZP estimated as 150,000-300,000 doses per month and steady increase in dosage strength form 7080mg to 500mg per pill. Despite widespread use little is known about short and long term effects on humans.
Submitters consider that animal studies and two human studies suggest BZP almost indistinguishable from
dexamphetamine. Basic pharmacological data on BZP such as absorption, elimination and toxic threshold, dose
response and lethal dose is unknown, and very little toxicological data exists. ( For further background see
submissions 17, 20 ) Importance: earlier work had suggested potentially serious common adverse effects with
some individuals particularly susceptible to severe BZP toxicity and seizures from relatively low levels of tablets.
Submitters were interested to examine whether seizures related to the level of BZP in plasma or some other
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
42
Submission
number
Position3
12
Support
17
Support
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
unknown variable at receptor or cellular level or drug interactions. Because of reports that BZP is co-ingested
with alcohol in 85% of cases (SHORE report) the effects of alcohol on BZP toxicity were examined. Methods;
Data on all presentations to CHCH ED (1Jan 2005-1 Oct 2006) was captured prospectively. From Nov 2005
plasma and BZP levels were measured. Levels were compared with incidence of seizures. Co-ingested alcohol
use was correlated with frequency of seizures, confusion, agitation, vomiting, anxiety and palpitations. Results:
147 out of 149 presentations were analysed. Age range 15-42 years (median 19). 53% females and 47% males.
Females start and stop use at a younger age. No of pills taken recorded in 120 cases showed an average of
3.89. Females took 2.96 versus 4.9 for males. Maximum taken 3.4 minimum 1. Two claimed to take BZP
intravenously (both presented with seizures). The patients with seizures had taken slightly fewer pills on average
(3.36 versus 3.89). Regression analysis of BZP plasma levels against incidence of seizures showed a trend of
higher BZP levels increasing likelihood of seizures (trend not statistically significant). When subdivided into
groups ingesting with and without alcohol, increasing plasma levels of BZP, those taking BZP alone had a higher
probability of seizure than those that had co-ingested with alcohol. But co-ingestion with alcohol led to a large
increase in BZP related symptoms that are distressing to the patient and led to difficulty in management such as
anxiety, agitation, confusion and vomiting. The submitters conclude that there is a narrow margin of safety when
the drug is ingested recreationally by some users.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
The submitter references the May 2007 NZ Medical Journal (Alansari and Hamilton) which reports serious side
effects of BZP-based party pills including severe agitation, seizures, paranoia, hyperthermia, abdominal pain and
cardiac arrhythmias. The submitter notes that BZP produces euphoria and keeps users awake. The submitter
states without specific reference that BZP produces tachycardia and hypertension (not usually dangerous but in
excess can cause cardiac toxicity, hyperthermia, dehydration, hallucination and seizure) and when mixed with
alcohol can be life threatening. The submitter comments that long term use is unknown. The submitter notes that
the drug was first reported in NZ in Dunedin in 2004 when 5 students presented to Dunedin’s hospital’s
emergency department with toxic effect (Gee et al December 2005). Waikato hospital emergency department also
started to receive patients with toxic effect (Alansari May 2006). The submitter concludes there is now clear
evidence that use of BZP can cause serious harm.
The submitter supports the EACD recommendation. They are concerned that use of BZP can interfere with
anaesthetic drugs and cause adverse reactions including bleeding, dizziness, vomiting and respiratory problems.
The submitter is concerned about the widespread use of party pills and the risk of toxic and other adverse effects
these substances can have. They consider many are unaware of the adverse interactions when co-ingested with
alcohol or prescription medicines. They are concerned that manufacturers of BZP are downplaying the risks
when there is mounting scientific evidence to the contrary.
In support of their views the submitter attached four articles produced in the NZ Medical Journal. They are:
Gee and Fountain, “Party on? BZP party pills in New Zealand” 2007 NZMJ 120 (1249); Theron L, Jansen K,
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
43
Submission
number
Position3
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
Miles J “Benzylpiperazine-based party pills’ impact on the Auckland City Hospital Emergency Department
Overdose database (2002-2004) compared with ecstasy (MDMA of methylene dioxymethamphetamine), gamma
hydroxylbutyrate (GHB), amphetamines, cocaine, and alcohol” 2007 NZMJ 120, 1249; Alansari M, Hamilton D.
“Nephrotoxicity of BZP-based herbal party pills: a NZ case report” 2006 NZMJ 119, 1233; Gee p, Richardson S,
Woltersdorf w, Moore G “Toxic effects of BZP-based herbal party pills in human: a prospective study in
Christchurch, New Zealand” 2005 118, 1227
(Note: Dr Paul Gee has a submission elsewhere (sub 20), and has lodged a further submission (38) in
partnership with one other) ( Additional Note: other submitters reference the above listed articles)
The key points of each of the appended articles are summarised below:
Gee and Fountain (G and F) article describes party pills, gives an outline of events leading to the EACD 2006
recommendation. The article comments on the initial decision of EACD in March 2004 when it decided there was
inadequate evidence for a complete ban. G and F comment on the EACD having been advised that substitution
was occurring allowing users to “exit the illegal market”. G and F note that this comment was not referenced to
allow substantiation of that claim. Gee and Fountain further reference Theron et al article NZMJ 2007 noting that
this compares presentations to Auckland City Hospital Emergency Dept resulting from use during 2002-2004
compared with presentations from alcohol and various illicit drugs with results showing a significant increase in
presentations due to PPP over the period but little impact on illicit drug presentations. G and F note that in the
2002-2004 study harm appeared low but prevalence is unknown and the study predates the boom in PPP sales.
G and F also note that harm identified in the Auckland study is different from the 2005 Christchurch experience
where patients presenting to Christchurch ED over a 5month period in 2005 had a 15% rate of seizure, 2 patients
requiring ventilator support and intensive care. A 50% rate of admission was reported and hence evidence of
serious harm.
The G and F article summarises an extract of minutes from the EACD 2006 meeting and notes: PPP use has
risen quickly; 20% of 13-45 year olds have tried PPP with almost 40 % of 20-24 yr olds having tried; highlighted a
high rate of adverse effects with severe effects occurring unpredictably and at relatively low dose; the national
Drug Intelligence Bureau and Customs Service say there is no evidence of a levelling or decline in use of
methamphetamine.
Theron et al: Aim: to examine the impact of party pills on the Auckland City Hospital ED overdose database
2002-2004 and present figures for 5 other substances in that database. Method: The database was reviewed for
herbal ingestions, party pills, ecstasy, methamphetamine, GHB, cocaine, and alcohol. Adverse effects attributed
to PP were examined. Results: 2002 - 1 patient presented with PP ingestions; 2003 – 2 presented ; 2004 – 21
presented. Of the 21 in 2004, 5 had allegedly ingested PP only and none required medical admission. PP only
contributed to 1.58% of the overdose database for 2004. Conclusion; Party pills appeared to have a minor impact
on the database in the period. There was a significant decrease in GHB presentation in the period but no
significant fall in stimulant overdose presentations.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
44
Submission
number
18
Position3
Support
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
Gee et al: Aim: to describe patterns of human toxicity related to the use of 1-benzylpiperazine (BZP) based
‘herbal party pills’
Method: presentations in the period 1 April 2005 to 1 September 2005 associated with party pill use were
captured on a prospective data collection form. Results: 61 patients presented on 80 occasions to Christchurch
ED. Patients with adverse effects took on average 4.5 tablet/capsules. Patients with mild to moderate toxicity
experienced symptoms such as insomnia, anxiety, nausea, vomiting palpitations, dystonia, and urinary retention.
Some adverse reactions persisted up to 24 hours after ingestion. 15 toxic seizures were reported. 2 patients
suffered life-threatening toxicity with status epilepticus and severe respiratory and metabolic acidosis.
Conclusions: herbal party pills sold without regulation since 2000 are now widely used by young New Zealanders.
The principal ingredient is (BZP). They appear to have a narrow safety margin when used recreationally by some
humans, possibly because of intrinsic pharmacodynamic properties, self-dosing variability or genetic
polymorphism. Those with seizure disorders of coronary disease should avoid BZP as should those taking
prescriptions sympathomimerics or anticholinergics. Co-ingestion with MDMA, amphetamine should be cautioned
against. The study indicates that BZP can cause unpredictable and serious toxicity in some individuals. Gee et
all say that the results of this study should be carefully considered in any discussion on the legal status of
piperazine based party pills.
Alansari et al; Aim: To present findings of a 2006 case report commenting of a case of nephrotoxicity which is
reported usually in association with rhabdomyolysis. This case reports on acute renal failure requiring
haemodialysis in the absence of rhabdomyolysis. Discussion: the time relationship between taking the pills and
the acute renal failure in a previously healthy young man supports a causal association. For stimulants in
general, acute renal failure is believed to be either due to circulatory collapse or rhabdomyolysis rather than due
to direct toxic effect. Circulatory collapse can be secondary to hyperthermia, excessive sweating, and consequent
dehydration with or without tachyarrhythmia. Rhabdomyolysis can be due to hyperthermia, severe agitation and
excessive muscular activity. Alansari et al postulate that the acute renal failure observed in this case may be
related to a direct toxic effect of the party pills on the kidneys. Resolution of the acute renal failure occurred
spontaneously.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Submitters comment from their personal experience and are concerned about the impact of BZP on individuals
who already suffer from major mental illnesses and who may be under treatment or may only be seen
occasionally by mental services. The submitter has treated a man admitted with a severed arm while in a
psychotic state after using BZP.
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
45
Submission
number
Position3
52
Oppose
54
Oppose
61 & 61a
Oppose
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter, plus 9,186 consumers of party pills containing BZP, consider that BZP party pills are a safer legal
alternative to harder more dangerous illicit substances and if consumed responsibly the risk of harm is low.
These submitters consider alcohol and tobacco cause more harm to consumers than party pills. Submitter notes
signatures were collected in a very short time period.
Submitter notes; that BZP is amphetamine like but that risk is lower than with methamphetamine; that there are
perceived beneficial effects; that there have been adverse events although these may be due to poly-drug use
with illegal substances; that there is no direct evidence that BZP is the soul determinate of adverse events; that
there is not a slow onset of effect; that effects of chronic use are unknown; that trials demonstrating serious
adverse effects should be queried; that the severity of adverse effects depends on how harm assessment is
defined; that trials may be using larger doses of BZP and TFMPP than the test subjects normally take, and that
capsules (containing powder) give a bigger hit than tablets; that fasting for 6hrs is different from taking on an
empty stomach and risks nausea; that severity of toxicity depends on dosage levels; that the effects with other
drugs should not be a predeterminant to the decision making process regarding classification. Submitter further:
considers there is little evidence that BZP was the contributor solely or in part to seizures; notes dosage levels
rather than pill quantities are not recorded in the adverse events noted; notes that if there is some involvement in
toxic events the level of event is so small in terms of total number of pills consumed that risk equates to that of
food poisoning; considers evidence to date suggest that BZP tends to reduce the effects of alcohol.
Submitter notes that there is not clear evidence of harm and that decision had not used a standard harm risk
matrix to weigh the real risks of harm; the report on which moderate harm was decided had not used
recommended dosages and did not create normal environmental condition; the apparent harm assessment matrix
used to arrive at the terminology severe (i.e. those requiring hospital treatment) also gave subjects higher levels
of TFMPP than they had used before; the trial was not completed and results were over very small sample.
Submitter further notes there is no proven direct link between BZP and serious adverse events; EACD has not
developed an accurate harm assessment matrix, weighted correctly in a non-linear fashion before a moderate
harm statement is made. Submitter points out that the decision was a consensus decision and contends that this
is not appropriate for scientific assessment. Submitter notes that it is incorrect to say toxicity was suffered at low
doses as only number of pills was known not dose rate; the EACD assessment does not take into account risks
caused by making BZP illegal and what level of users will source BZP in the illicit market or move to other illicit
products.
The “key findings” of EACD are not good reasons to suggest “moderate harm” as “the evidence is inconclusive on
whether there is potential for toxicity and seizures “after relatively low doses” and there is no probative evidence
that there is a risk to public health from intoxication or rebound fatigue…. (and) even if true, the EACD has not
explained why these key reasons are sufficient to objectively conclude that a moderate risk of harm is
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
46
Submission
number
Position3
Pharmacological, psychoactive and toxicological effects
established.” These don’t relate to factors normally considered relevant to substance classification (dependence,
withdrawal, tolerance, reinforcement and intoxication).
Only two studies have reported seizures (26 in 20 months in the Christchurch study by Dr Gee, and one in the
Massey University study), out of an estimated 24 million pills consumed.
The evidence suggests a reduction in adverse incidents in Christchurch since October 2005, and that no research
has shown why the pattern of events in Christchurch occurred there and not elsewhere, or why it has changed.
STANZ has found no other research showing toxicity and/or seizures at “relatively low doses”.
42
Oppose
58
Oppose
The MRINZ report claiming added knowledge on serious toxicity including seizures not supported by other study
findings which showed no seizures and did not record toxicity. The use of multiple substances by people makes
the effect of BZP alone unknown. MRINZ ethics letter noted that co-ingestion of other substances by many
subjects clouds analysis of a causal link between BZP and seizures in the Christchurch Hospital study.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
Submitter considers the infrequent hospital admissions indicate BZP is relatively safe.
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
The submitter considers that both the frequency and type of harm are critical to the debate. On the issue of
frequency of harm the submitter concludes that the incidence is very small. With regard to degrees of harm
submitter considers NZ research shows that for most users the common adverse effects are insomnia,
headaches, nausea and anxiety and there have been no deaths directly attributable to BZP. The submitter
acknowledges that significant adverse effects like seizure have been reported but that nearly all of these patients
had been using multiple drugs at the time and the seizure was not able to be attributed to BZP use. Severe
toxicity reported by one individual may reflect the individual’s physiology. The submitter notes the obvious
difference between young people’s description of experience of BZP use and the committee’s understanding as
demonstrated in the Sheridan and Butler study. Also the SHORE study showed that none of the young people felt
the harm caused by BZP was significant and that sleeplessness and hangover were the highest rating harm.
None had used emergency departments for BZP related illness and none knew friends that had.
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
47
3.3
The risks, if any to public health
Context
The EACD considered in relation to BZP that:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
there is potential for harm to others (eg effects of intoxication on driving performance or operation of machinery)
there is concern that BZP use has been ‘normalised’, potentially resulting in an increased risk of a culture of drug use
it is possible that some users who would otherwise use more harmful drugs especially methamphetamine are using BZP as a
legal (and safer) alternative
there is the potential to affect neurodevelopment in adolescents.
there is a suggestion of links with New Zealand’s culture of risky alcohol consumption
the availability of raw BZP powder and the potential to extract BZP powder from capsules creates a potential risk of increased
intravenous use
there is a public perception that the legal status implies that BZP has been through a robust regulatory process and is thus
considered ‘safe’
there is no evidence of aggressive behaviour, sexual assault or date rape type behaviours
there have been no recorded deaths solely as a result of BZP use.
Submission
number
4
Position4
5
Support
35
Oppose
Response to public health risks
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter (a youth worker with 20 years experience) is concerned that the unregulated use of pills indicates that
“pill culture” is acceptable and is leading to a risk of pill swapping and unknowing exchange of party pills for “date
rape” pills. Submitter believes she knows of one incident already and is concerned that this could be more
common. Submitter does not accept that making “party pills” unavailable will encourage use of harder drugs. She
believes this is a weak argument presented by retailers. Submitter does not support the argument that prohibition
won’t work and feels that the arguments for prohibiting party pills are as sound as those for prohibiting heroin and
class A drugs.
Submitter (occasional BZP user who is undertaking a PhD on needle exchange) considers there is a risk to public
health because: (i) the publicity given to individual cases in the media may discourage drug overdose cases from
presenting to hospitals; and (ii) if BZP is made illegal price will rise and users looking for a more cost-efficient
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
48
Submission
number
Position4
37
Oppose
43
Oppose
57
59
Oppose
Support
3
Support
29
Support
Response to public health risks
option may turn to use BZP powder intravenously. Submitter also considers making BZP illegal will lead to an
increased use of Ritalin and amphetamines.
Submitter has calculated that there are 1.2 million person years of use. At a societal level there have been no
deaths over 7 years in an approximate user population of 4 million people (no deaths in 28 million person years).
In this period there have been 182,000 deaths due to other causes. Analysed for age groups and using Statistics
NZ data as well as results of SHORE report, submitter calculates that there are 280,000 people in the 15-44 yrs
user category. The NZHIS records 1,618 deaths amongst this grouping in 2003 suggesting a death rate for any
cause of 1:1,050. Therefore, one could expect amongst 280,000 users 267 deaths from any cause over a year or
5 deaths per week. The submitter says it is mathematically certain that someone who happened to recently use
PBST will happen to die from whatever the cause. Submitter calculated the average cost of treating patients who
had consumed BZP including those who had co-ingested alcohol, cannabis, and other drugs as $483.13 and that
the total costs for 2005 to the Canterbury DHB were less than $100,000 out of a budget of $1,000million.
Submitter noted that there have been fewer than 20 actual hospital admissions associated with PBST use over 7
years out of a total of approximately 5 million due to any cause. Given the documented quantity and frequency of
use even if there were 3 deaths per year the risk to the individual user would be classified as very low and the
societal risk would be negligible.
Submitter: acknowledges the potential for harm by BZP users driving or operating machinery while intoxicated but
does not know the incidence rates of this occurring. Suggests drugged driving should be approached like drink
driving through a harm reduction education campaign. Submitter considers most responsible users will not use
the drug intravenously. The higher strength of BZP powder compared with pills is suggested as being a
contributory factor for BZP-related hospital admissions in Canterbury.
Submitter notes that Wilkins survey suggests that BZP use does not appear to be a gateway to other drugs.
Submitter notes that as a social worker cites has seen damage such as unwanted pregnancies from their use.
Too accessible to young people (lack of judgement about consequences).
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Local government community group is concerned that party pill use combined with alcohol is having a negative
effect on the health of young people. Group is also concerned about the targeting of sale of party pills to young
people by retail outlets.
Submitter has several years experience working on the streets providing support to at-risk youth who are
experimenting with alcohol and drugs. Note that the problem of party pill use goes beyond the mild to moderate
toxicity problems. Considers that youth having tried drugs designed to mimic methamphetamines P and Ecstasy
become interested in experimenting with the ‘real deal’.
Submitter also expressed concern that the increasing supply of party pills is pushing the price down for the
competing products that party pills mimic (viz ecstasy and methamphetamine) resulting in these products
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
49
Submission
number
Position4
31
Split view
7
Oppose
8 / 8A
Comment
only
23
Oppose
27
Oppose
46
Oppose
Response to public health risks
becoming more affordable. Argues that suppliers of these alternative products are reducing quality in order to be
able to produce them more cheaply. Submitter considers removing party pills will result in an increase in the price
of these alternative illegal drugs. The submitter also considers that while prices are not too far apart, users would
prefer to pay friends and family in the black market rather than line government’s pocket by using product sold in
a government controlled market.
LG council community youth group (12 of whom are opposed to class C1 classification) are concerned that the
classification of BZP as a C1 would result in youths purchasing drugs from the illegal market.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitters comment on the possibility of the “gateway effect” by referring to the SHORE report which found that
more than 50% of party pill users are occasional (once or twice a year) users. The SHORE report also showed
that 33% had stopped using illicit drugs favouring the legal pills. On the issue of potential intravenous use the
submitters considered an increase unlikely because BZP is caustic and hence painful and therefore unlikely to
become popular.
Draft report provided by the submitter shows results of research (survey of first year students) suggesting a large
percentage of party pill users are also likely to be occasionally using illicit drugs (LSD, ecstasy, speed, nitrous
oxide, Ritalin). This existing use means, therefore, that making BZP use illicit is unlikely to result in any new swing
to harder drugs. BZP use in the sample group surveyed is more popular than all illicit substances except
cannabis. Also BZP users more likely to experiment with a wider range of substances than non BZP users. P is
the least attractive drug for users and non-users of BZP in the sample.
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter notes majority of users in a Nelson/Tasman study reported not driving under influence of LPP although
help agencies report being aware of clients driving under the influence at least some of the time. This result aligns
with Wilkins findings.
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) comments on the issue of
“gateway effects”. Submitter looks at the Wilkins report and notes: 13.5% started out using legal party pills but
now mostly use illegal substances; 44.1% were using illicit substances but now most use legal party pills;
Approximately the same percentage used illegal drugs and legal party pills and had no change to the level of
illegal use. Based on this, the submitter says it is not possible to estimate what the rate of use of amphetamine or
methamphetamine use would have been if party pills were not available.
Submitter (advisory service supporting people to access addiction treatment service): accepts that products that
contain BZP and related piperazines do lead to some personal and social harm but notes this at the lower end of
the scale when compared with alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs like cannabis. Harm minimisation should be
through regulation not class C1 prohibition.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
50
Submission
number
Position4
Response to public health risks
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
2
Support
19
Oppose
20
Support
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter (medical practitioner and cardiac specialist) refers to paper by Gee (see sub 20) which states that in 5
winter months over 2005, 61 patients presented 80 times at Christchurch hospital suffering from adverse effects
of party pills. Submitter considered this a very large number (average of four persons a week) with significant
public health outcome. Submitter also concludes that use of any mood altering substance is closely associated
with eventual use of more addictive drugs, and eventually to crime.
Submitter considers the public health risks from BZP should be considered against risks created as a result of
classification. The submitter is concerned that BZP restriction will create a greater public health risk as
methamphetamine will be used as alternative because it is cheap and easy to manufacture and distribute.
Submitter notes (no reference) that methamphetamine is the principal active agent in the majority of street pills
(as opposed to the commercially sold) currently seized and sampled. Methamphetamine has an addictive
potential with users able to develop tolerance leading to overdoses and transference from ingestion to smoking
and intravenous use. This introduces new risks, including HIV, HEP-C and bacterial infections. Australian
experience is of increased number of violent psychotic presentations to ED requiring chemical restraint guidelines
and Code Grey alerts which the submitter states is a rare event in NZ. Submitter also comments on two clinical
cases in NZ of serious side effects resulting from the use of “Street pills” (no reference provided). Although media
reports of this described the pills as BZP the submitter says they were illegal street pills that consisted of a mix of
BZP and MDMA like substances.
From personal communication submitter has formed a view that party pill users are purchasing fewer illicit
substances one of the reasons being financial – party pills being considerably cheaper. Submitter considers the
slower (compared with Australia) spread of methamphetamine use in NZ society and ongoing avoidance of IV
drug use is partly due to BZP pills providing an alternative and also preventing first contact with organised crime.
Submitter also notes the large commercial legal “pills” industry offers an alternative to the illegal “street pill”
industry and notes that ESR analysis of street seizures shows that street pills are very dangerous. Analysis found
various amounts of MDMA, MDA and BZP. Submitter considers this a marketing strategy of the criminal industry
to buy legal substance, repress, rebrand, and re-sell at 5 times the price.
Submitter (ED physician) is concerned that ready availability of BZPs has led to use by high school age children
and accidental ingestion by children. The submitter considers the impact on public health is difficult to predict,
particularly in regards to the margin between reversible “safe” effects and permanent damage. The impact of this
on public health is difficult to predict.
Submitter argues that there are no clear statistics available for BZP related health visits or hospital related
admissions in NZ. Most hospitals use the ICD-10am system for classifying admissions but there is considerable
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
51
Submission
number
Position4
17
Support
40
Oppose
11
Split view
Response to public health risks
inconsistency in the way BZP is classified, they may be classified as ‘stimulants’, amphetamines or antiparasitics.
BZP related ED visits are not coded and reported to NZ Health Information service and will not appear in any
national statistics historically or in the foreseeable future.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter attaches a Gee and Fountain article (NZMJ 2007) about the implications of NZ having a legal market for
psychoactive drugs. Concern is that legal market could release an unknown number of little understood
psychoactive compounds including those used by indigenous cultures as well as novel designer drugs. Some of
these are already being imported and sold in NZ. Gee and Fountain consider impact on public health that would
be difficult to predict.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Submitter ( Christchurch Community Alcohol and Drug Service) supports further debate on the issue of whether
BZP is a gateway drug to illicit substances such as P and whether the criminalisation of BZP would increase other
substance misuse.
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
The submitter provides a report prepared by the Health Promoter – Alcohol and Drugs employed by the Hawkes’
Bay DHB. The report includes the results of a public petition. The objective for holding the petition was to inform
the public of the chemicals used in the manufacture of party pills so as to counteract promotional advertising and
to enable the public to make more informed choice. The petition offered signatories two choices classification or
tighter regulation of party pills. Results of the petition was that 729 people responded (249 wanted to see tighter
regulations, 480 supported classification).
The report also contained the results of a survey organised through the Health Promotion Unit which asked young
people 30 questions relevant to sex, alcohol and drug use. 64 young people completed the survey (39 female 25
male). Of the respondents 66% indicated they had used drugs. Age when first used ranged between 9-17 years
with the modal group first using in the range 13-15yrs. 58% has used Cannabis, 31% party pills 7% ecstasy(also
called speed),7% inhalants, 4%nos, 3%LSD, 3%P. Of those that used 35% had used drugs once or rarely.
The report states that party pills pose a real health threat for individuals especially for those who regularly take
over the maximum dosage and co-ingest with alcohol. The report considers there is not an overdose risk but that
maximum dosage can lead to sleep deprivation, dehydration, feelings of being stressed, lack of emotional control,
headaches, nausea, convulsion, hallucination, rapid heart rate. The submitters did not provide information in
support. The report comments on the experience of “Directions youth centre” which provides free medical
service, counselling and peer support for young people who have developed health issues through the use of BZP
party pills. These issues are reported to include unprotected sex; non-consensual sex; drink spiking; black-out
episodes.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
52
Submission
number
Position4
44
Oppose
54
Oppose
61 & 61a
Oppose
Response to public health risks
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter does not accept that there is the strong and irrefutable evidence of a severe risk to public health and
safety that is needed to justify a ban.
Submitter notes Thompson et al research which is seeking to establish the effect of BZP and alcohol on driving,
records in its abstract that BZP improves driving performance. House of Commons Science and Technology
Committee 2005-2006 found no conclusive evidence to support gateway theory. Agrees with the potential benefits
of legal BZP as a safer alternative to other stimulant use; agrees that enforced age limit should prevent any
impact of neurodevelopment on adolescents; notes the majority of users keep alcohol use at levels of less or the
same (SHORE); suggests those who use BZP intravenously are already intravenous users and use BZP when
their drug of choice is unavailable and notes BZP used intravenously is very unpleasant; suggests restriction to
tablet form should overcome the IV problem; Sees no evidence that the legal status implies a robust regulatory
process and suggests a product review process can be undertaken; Says there is no evidence of BZP causing
aggressive behaviour, sexual assault or date-rape type behaviours; Notes that adverse effects of BZP may
discourage users from taking BZP in the future and that if so could reduce overall desire for drug use and deter
users from moving into illegal market. Submitter suggests further research on this point.
Submits that BZP presents a low risk to public health compared to alcohol and tobacco.
Challenges EACD statement that risks of BZP use are lower than methamphetamine and broadly similar to that of
ephedrine, as no studies to compare products or risks.
No finding in evidence supporting EACD’s advice that ‘as with alcohol and other psychoactive drugs, there is the
potential to affect neurodevelopment in adolescents’.
Cites ConsumerLink survey (commissioned by STANZ, respondents were not asked about behaviours when
mixing any substances and the survey report assumes the substances are reflected in isolation) that:
• adverse effects and visits to accident and emergency were less common for party pills (1.5 % of the
survey, 3.7 % of those who take party pills) than alcohol (4.5 % of the survey, 7.3 % of those who take
party pills), that 0.5 % (zero %) of legal party pill users visited a GP after taking party pills in the last year,
0.5 % (1.2 %) had spoken to a counsellor, 0.5 % had required an ambulance (1.2 %).
• no driving accidents had followed party pill consumption (2 % of all respondents had had a driving
accident from alcohol, 3.7 % of those who take legal party pills had had a driving accident from alcohol)
• 15.9 % (of respondents who drank and take party pills) were consuming less alcohol due to legal party
pills and 1.2 % stopped consuming alcohol (7.3 % said they consumed more alcohol)
• 7.4 % (of those who took illegal drugs and legal party pills) said they had reduced consumption of illegal
drugs (due to the availability of party pills) and 2.9 % had stopped.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
53
Submission
number
Position4
Response to public health risks
Cites Dr Paul Quigley on 60 Minutes (TV3) that BZP may be safer than alcohol, and if BZP withdrawn some may
seek alternative more harmful drugs. Health professionals on the programme lacked consensus on BZP risks.
(Transcript attached, also mentions dangers of mixing BZP with other substances, including alcohol, illegal drugs,
and prescription drugs – and a case of severe reaction from mixing prescription drugs and BZP.)
Cites Auckland School of Pharmacy study usage of health and emergency services lower than alcohol drinkers
and limited evidence of significant harms.
Notes MOH advice of potential risks of BZP ban: young people may drink more alcohol, other illegal stimulants
could be more popular, legal stimulants such as Ritalin could be sought, MDMA (ecstasy) use could increase,
people may use more nicotine (particularly existing smokers), caffeine product use may increase, potential
recreational ephedrine use, some ex-meth users may return to or increase meth use, users more likely to deal
with illegal drug dealers, BZP may be adulterated more, have more varied dosages and fewer buffers to the active
drug”.
Challenges EACD use of National Poisons Centre report reference to anecdotal reports concerned about risks to
shift workers and drivers using party pills to stay awake. No report to EACD concluded BZP was a threat to public
health by hindering the operation of machinery or vehicles. MRINZ study suggests BZP improves driving. EACD
should not classify BZP based on anecdotal evidence.
Notes MoH aware of home manufacturing of BZP with no quality controls, expresses concern that if BZP ban
home manufacturing is likely to increase, more risks to health.
Acknowledges concerns about contamination or mixing with other substances, under age users, and people
exceeding the recommended dose.
Ref to Massey University study, one seizure reported but submits the other adverse effects commonly associated
with alcohol and are not a serious risk to health.
Says ESR testing of “party pills” only tested illicit ones sold in the streets, “not legal party pills sold by STANZ
members” and questions evidence value of this testing.
Submits there is lack of knowledge about whether adverse effects attributed due to BZP alone, “drug cocktails” or
lack of controls/deficient manufacturing (needing regulation). Interprets evidence as low risk of harm when
STANZ’s recommended dose 200mg exceeded and mix BZP with alcohol and/or illicit substances. No evidence
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
54
Submission
number
Position4
Response to public health risks
on effects of BZP alone.” Risks identified less than those associated with tobacco or alcohol.
Quality and Use of Evidence
Evidence used by EACD mostly draft, preliminary and summary reports that have not been peer reviewed, risk
not sufficiently robust. Process was rushed, prior to the 29 November EACD meeting. Information considered
received late, draft, incomplete.
Discusses MRINZ “only clinical study” report, showed frequent side effects and potential for serious harm in
some. STANZ:
• got expert opinion the study “is incapable of establishing that benzylpiperazine poses a moderate risk of
harm, and thus... should not be relied on… as the basis for making any scheduling changes.”
• suggests study confuses the medical terms “severe” and “serious” events (ref to a speech by the
Minister).
• notes MRINZ letter ending study said there were “no serious adverse events”, suggests reasons for
terminating study inadequate and exaggerated, questions the relevance of the most severe effect
reported.
• submits adverse effects by 41 % of sample not consistent with other studies, and that all reports on
adverse effects not reliable because they “invariably” also involve alcohol consumption (41 % of
intervention group had severe adverse reactions, none of control group did).
• suggests definition of “severe” as “incapacitating with inability to work or perform usual activity” doesn’t
show degree of health risk a symptom presents, or effect of alcohol or alcohol and BZP. Notes authors
said no serious adverse events, and toxicity presumed (not proven).
• expresses concern some participants may have had past adverse anxiety reactions, the environment of
trial may have influenced reactions, and report claim about serious toxicity including seizures not
supported by study findings (no seizures and did not record toxicity).
Cites Dr Bruce Russell’s study comments, BZP a stimulant, few side effects, difficulty sleeping and 2 headache
(which may have been caffeine withdrawal).
Submits as trial only BZP and lower doses (250mg)
pharmaceutically prepared rather than commercial products it is more accurate, shows that lower dose lessens
risks of adverse side effects.
Submits Massey Study shows BZP party pill use widespread, risks low, and banning BZP could encourage use of
illicit drugs and reduce gateway off illicit drugs.
Claims Massey finding 1/100 users went to emergency department and 1/ 250 admitted for treatment not
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
55
Submission
number
Position4
Response to public health risks
supported by hospital records (citing the Auckland Hospital study), and most BZP users took other substances
too, primarily alcohol, so effects are of combining BZP with other substances and not evidence of the adverse
effects of BZP alone.
Cites Massey further report says need more study to show role of BZP because of other substance use. Main
adverse effects insomnia (50 %), headaches (22 %) and nausea (22 %), few users reported passing out (1.6 %)
and seizures (0.3 %)
Notes small sample Auckland School of Pharmacy report exploratory, didn’t find many serious short term
problems linked with their party pill use, most used it mainly socially and able to cut down when not willing to cope
with negative effects.
The EACD consideration of Auckland School of Pharmacy report noted:
• party pills may not be decreasing demand for illicit drugs, no evidence use of illicit substances has
levelled off or declined
• legal status of BZP may mean some use as considered safer, no risk of prosecution, trade off an illegal
high for lower, legal high.
STANZ suggests this is speculation not supported by the report, and misleading, and cites the report’s limitations
related to scope and size.
Re: Dr Paul Gee’s Christchurch study that found BZP can cause unpredictable and serious toxicity in some
individuals:
• submits EACD wrong that 3 only had BZP, 1 or those 3 had alcohol, and dose taken by other two
unknown
• Cites letters by Dr Brent Caldwell (seeking approval for MRINZ study) that high strength tablets in Chch,
unknown doses and use of other substances clouds analysis.
• Submits results don’t clearly establish causal link between BZP and seizures or reflect the effects of BZP
in the general population
• Expresses concern that EACD placed disproportionate emphasis on study’s finding without Dr Caldwell’s
analysis being brought to its attention.
• Suggests self-reporting in overdose cases is unreliable (cites references).
• Notes presentations in Christchurch decreased since August 2005, suggests means BZP use is changing
or the products are becoming safer.
Notes concern about National Poisons Centre (NPC) conclusion “toxicity following PBPD [piperazine based party
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
56
Submission
number
Position4
Response to public health risks
drugs] ingestion is unpredictable and serious effects, including seizure, may occur even at recommended dose.”
• study used the same subjects as Christchurch Hospital
• only calculated the BZP dose in 27 % of cases or 19 of 73 reports, which averaged 585mg, ranging from
105mg to 1500mg, with 29 reports of the actual level of BZP dose and/or blood ethanol levels
• Only 4 % of patients (3 subjects) had serious toxicity.
• report estimated 27 % of patients had taken equal to or less than the recommended dose of 2 tablets or
400mg (notes this twice the level STANZ recommends, and questions estimate as dosage unknown in
many cases
• questions reliability of self-reporting, the effects of overdose (high levels) and the use of other substances
• notes some cases also had excessive drinking, which was not highlighted in the NPC report to EACD.
• expresses concern EACD may have been unduly influenced by this report.
• Comments although 27 % had reportedly only consumed party pills, 45 % had co-ingested alcohol and 29
% had co-ingested other drugs, and as party pills contain other substances all of the subjects had
consumed substances other than BZP, and thus conclusions can’t be drawn on the effects of BZP.
Cites Auckland City Hospital study:
• only 26 presentations for BZP overdose between 2002 and 2004 compared to 2,349 for alcohol
• only five who had only ingested BZP
• no seizures, and the most common complaints as anxiety, palpitations, nausea and vomiting.
STANZ submits that this more accurately shows the low risk of harm from BZP than the Christchurch study.
Suggests EACD did not consider relevant evidence showing BZP has a low risk of harm, such as Auckland
Hospital, and other relevant research projects not completed yet.
Submits should await the results of further trials currently underway before decision.
STANZ promotes BZP as a tool to reduce demand for illegal drugs such as methamphetamine. Submits banning
BZP will increase demand for other illegal and more harmful drugs, would remove BZP as a “gateway out”.
Cites IDMS Report (Massey University, 2005), suggests legal party pills may have reduced P demand, and that a
ban may reverse this trend, that ¼ of methamphetamine users obtain their drugs from gangs and frequent users
are offered starter packs of other drugs to try, and sale of “drug cocktails”, which may already include BZP.
Cites Massey University survey, current users of both party pills and illegal drugs, 3/10 used legal party pills only
when they could not get illicit drugs, 3/10 used them with illicit drugs, and 4/10 used them “so they do not have to
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
57
Submission
number
Position4
Response to public health risks
use illegal drugs”. Of party pill and illegal drugs users, 13.5 % (1 in 7) started with party pills but now mostly use
illegal drugs, 42.5 % (4 in 10) now use both, and 44 % say they were using illegal drugs but now mostly use party
pills.
In a letter from the Chair, EACD indicated no evidence available on whether BZP was having a “gateway off”
(other drugs) effect, or preventing people from starting to use illegal drugs, and that the SHORE study in 2006 did
not clarify this.
Effects related to illegal or other drug use
A ConsumerLink survey (commissioned by STANZ) shows that:
• 7.4 % (of those who took illegal drugs and legal party pills) said they had reduced consumption of illegal
drugs (due to the availability of party pills) and 2.9 % had stopped
• if party pills were banned 54.9 % (of party pill users) thought illegal drug consumption would increase,
36.6 % of respondents (of party pill users) thought alcohol consumption would increase following a ban,
and 36 % (of all respondents) thought drug related crime would increase.
58
Oppose
60
Support
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Regarding a gateway effect (the ability of one drug to increase the inclination to use other drugs) evidence
suggest the inverse because 50% of the SHORE survey of 1200 users stated they used party pills so they did not
have to use illegal drugs. Also 44% stated they were using illicit drugs previously but now mostly used legal party
pills.
Submitter notes there is no indication that use or abuse an issue for care and protection services at this stage.
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
58
3.4
Therapeutic value, if any
Context
The EACD considered there is:
•
•
no scientific evidence of therapeutic use
anecdotal evidence of weight loss fits with stimulant status.
Submission
number
5
Position5
1
Oppose
48
56
Support
Oppose
62
Oppose
31
Split view
Response to therapeutic value
INDIVIDUALS
Individual diagnosed with depressive disorder and social phobia found using BZP of therapeutic value by
improving confidence and reducing social anxiety enabling submitter to leave house and mix with others. Other
pharmacotherapy treatment had failed.
Submitter (4 school counsellors) consider there is no therapeutic value in BZP use
Submitter attached an article from the Free Radical as a submission. This article records benefits of BZP as
helping relieve mental fatigue, drowsiness and general inertia, and of providing enjoyment. Also notes that the
world anti-doping agency has BZP on its banned drug list because it is a performance enhancing drug unlike
alcohol which is performance impairing.
Submitter uses BZP product “SLIMFAST” as a weight reduction tool. Takes 1 x 60mg tab/day for eight weeks
(420mg/week), then stops for four weeks. Compares to ‘party pill product’ examples, some have higher doses in
short period. She has lost weight, and increased physical fitness. Notes research hasn’t been done on use for
cosmetic purposes, and that there are health benefits for her in losing weight and increasing activity, and reduced
health costs to society.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
LG community youth group considers there is social benefit in a product that assists shy people to come out of
their comfort zone
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
No specific commentary
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
No specific commentary
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
59
Submission
number
Position5
Response to therapeutic value
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
2
Support
20
Support
36
Support
50
Oppose
30
Oppose
54
Oppose
61 & 61a
Oppose
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter considers the benefits of BZP use of alertness and gregariousness are outweighed by the health risks
associated with BZP being self-administered and being co-ingested with other toxic substances such as alcohol.
Submitter (ED physician) considers BZP has no therapeutic benefit but should be controlled because of potential
harm of: abuse; dependence; subtle, gross or delayed neurological damage; interactions with prescription drugs
and adverse effects on unborn.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter represents over 3000 pharmacists and sees no argument to use BZP in society as it is a psychoactive
drug with no therapeutic value.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Submitter (service provider in Auckland) points out that people seek to alter their consciousness through a range
of activities including meditation, sports or substance use
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter considers studies have proven alertness and driving skills improve after taking BZP and that there are
few ill-effects for people who follow the cautions and dosages.
Submitter notes that BZP works through the brain in the same way as caffeine and nicotine. Suggests BZP no
longer be used in weight loss products.
Submit that any inclusion of BZP in dieting agents can be controlled and prevented under the Food Act 1981 or
the Medicines Act 1981. Suggests labelling as dietary supplement came from misunderstanding with Ministry of
Health Most products no longer label that way.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
No specific commentary
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
60
3.5
The potential for use to cause death
Context
The EACD considered that:
•
•
•
there is no evidence of death caused solely by BZP consumption
toxic effects have the potential to lead to death
the potential for death heightened by use with other substances.
Submission
number
6
Position6
5
Support
37
Oppose
43
Oppose
7
Oppose
23
Oppose
Potential for death
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter does not accept there are no deaths caused by party pills and believes that a survey of all A and E
departments would show weekly incidents associated with herbal/alcohol use and that close examination would
show that deaths have occurred.
Submitter has calculated that there have been 1.2 million person years of use since 2000 in NZ and that during
this period there have been no documented deaths, very few presentations to hospital emergency departments
and even fewer admissions.
Submitter notes hundreds of thousands have used BZP occasionally and cumulatively and that no one yet has
died.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
No specific commentary
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitter notes that worldwide no deaths have been specifically attributed to BZP use alone; and further notes
that reported cases of problems are relatively rare compared with alternative recreational drugs
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (youth group Wellington) agree that Wilkins et al as well as unpublished survey of Sheridan and Butler
and Howieson found extensive use but no recorded incidents of death.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
No specific commentary
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
61
Submission
number
Position6
2
Support
20
Support
44
Oppose
54
Oppose
61 & 61a
Oppose
Potential for death
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
The submitter considers that BZP users risk dystonia, seizures, severe respiratory and metabolic acidosis and
acute psychosis. These events, even if treated, are likely to lead to permanent lifetime abnormalities and
premature death. Submitter refers to a report of National Board of Forensic Medicine (Sweden) (Wikstrom et al
2004) where BZP was found in forensic autopsies.
Submitter argues that absence of recorded death is not evidence of safety. If death was the only criteria to be
taken into account there would be bans on activities such as driving, swimming etc. Other items banned under the
Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (eg self adhesive tongue studs, faulty hot water bottles etc) were banned for
other safety criteria other than death.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
No specific commentary
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
No specific commentary
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter (retailer located in downtown Auckland for 10 years, retails BZP-based legal party pills and is a member
of STANZ) notes that there have been no deaths from BZP use.
Submitter: notes there is no evidence of deaths to date in NZ or internationally but agrees that the effects of polydrug use should be researched and accepts there is risk from intravenously taking 10mg/kg. Submitter: considers
there is little evidence that BZP was the contributor solely or in part to seizures and considers evidence to date
suggest that BZP tends to reduce the effects of alcohol. Notes dosage levels not recorded in the adverse events.
Suggests that if there is some involvement of BZP in toxic events, the level of the event is so small in terms of total
number of pills consumed that the risk equates to that of food poisoning;
Submitter notes no deaths have been attributed to BZP.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
No specific commentary
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
62
3.6
Creation of physical of psychological dependence
Context
The EACD considered there is:
•
some evidence that BZP can create dependence
Submission
number
7
Position7
37
Oppose
43
Oppose
57
Oppose
7
Oppose
8
Comment
only
Physical and psychological dependence
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter considers that little evidence of addiction to PBST can be found. SHORE enquiries to addict focused
centres failed to identify PBST as a significant factor in addiction and mental health service workloads.
Acknowledges a fine line between habits, obsessions, dependency and genuine addiction but considers this
research result is encouraging.
Submitter (anonymous) considers the likelihood of BZP inducing dependence is low because while the high is
pleasant, the comedown is mildly unpleasant and does not leave the user wanting more. Submitter suggests most
people are able to use BZP occasionally without becoming dependent. The same does not apply to ecstasy or
methamphetamine.
Submitter notes that Wilkins survey suggests that BZP does not appear to be addictive. Therefore, notes that party
pills offer a public benefit and mostly do not have harmful effects.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
No specific commentary
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitters state they have evaluated every available piece of published data about the effects of these
compounds on both people and animals and found little evidence that BZP and/or TFMPP induces either physical
or psychological dependence. Cite reference (Fantegrossiet al 2005) which suggests the combination of TFMPP
with BZP is likely to disrupt dependence if it existed.
Submitter provided a summary of a research project designed to test the argument that BZP provides an
alternative to illicit drugs for people who would otherwise be users. Report (available in draft) is described in 8A
below. 796 first year university students responded voluntarily and anonymously to a survey which asked about
current (defined within the last 6mths) use of 16 legal and illegal substances. The sample is considered by the
submitter to be representative of the target market for party pill retailers.
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
63
Submission
number
8A
Position7
Comment
only
Physical and psychological dependence
Preliminary analysis of the responses show: 7.4% (218) of the sample were current party pill users; Of the current
users 73.4% (160) also use illicit drugs (mostly cannabis); When Illicit drug users who currently use party pills are
compared with those who do not use party pills they are twice as likely to use LSD, ecstasy, speed, nitrous oxide,
and Ritalin and equally likely to use cocaine, ketamine, cannabis, P, GHB and heroin; The frequency of illicit drug
use by illicit drug users was not influenced by the use of party pills.
The submitters suggest that for illicit drug users, party pills are used in addition to illicit drugs. Preliminary analysis
also shows: 7.3% (58) of the sample used only party pills; Members of this 7.3% group had a greater interest in
trying illicit drugs than did non party pill users; Survey data shows they are twice as likely to want to try LSD,
Cocaine, ‘speed’, ketamine and 4 times likely to want to try ecstasy; With regard to P: 82% of party pill users said
they would never try P; 2.3% said they would like to try and (4.6%) were already using; With regard to ecstasy:
the submitter consider ecstasy to be the party pill-users illicit drug of choice because (33.9%) said they wanted to
try but (32.7%) said they would never try or use it again. The researchers make this statement even though
ecstasy is only the third most used illicit drug used by party pill users after cannabis (62.8% ) and nitrous oxide
(23.9%); 18.3% of party pill users already use ecstasy.
The submitters speculate as a result of their preliminary analysis that for party pill users classification : will not
result in a “swing back to P”; party pill users will continue to use illicit drugs as party pills are just another item on
illicit poly-drug user’s menu; if any shift it is more likely towards using ecstasy than towards using P but the extent
of that shift is unclear as 18.3% are already using ecstasy compared with 6.% of use in the general population.
The draft report on the study about “Recreational Drug Using Behaviour and Legal Party Pills”. Study done over 4
time points in 2006. 16 substances included in the survey were tobacco, alcohol, caffeine, inhalants, party pills
(BZP), LSD, cocaine, ecstasy, speed, ketamine, cannabis, ‘P’, nitrous oxide, GHB, heroin , Ritalin.
Method: Survey asked students: If they had ever used any of these substances over the last 6 months and if so,
Frequency of use; If they had ever used these substances; If they would use them again; If they would try them;
To rate (5point scale) degree of perceived safety/dangerousness; To describe the active ingredients. Non
identifying demographic data on gender, age and ethnicity was collected .
Results: Preliminary results are summarised in Submission 8 above
796 responses (67.6% female 32.4% male)
Demographic
Total
No current illicit substance Current illicit substance use
use
No current BZP use
Gp 1: 476 (71.4% F,28.6%M) Gp4: 111(58%F, 42%M)
578 (68.8% female,31.2%
male) ave age 20.8yrs)
Current BZP use
Gp2: 58 (69%F,31%M
Gp 3 160 (63%F, 37%M)
218 (64.7% female, 35.3%
male) average age 19.1
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
64
Submission
number
Position7
47
Oppose
27
Oppose
19
Oppose
20
Support
Physical and psychological dependence
Note error above. Either the total non users should be 587 or the numbers in group1 or 4 must be
incorrect - researchers will need to check the significance of this error. Researchers have not commented
if the sample of respondents is representative of the demographic mix of all first year students. There
appears to be a significant difference in the gender balance of Group 4 compared with the sample)
Submitter (a researcher and adviser in alcohol/drug addiction and treatment and specialist clinical psychologist)
compares his clinical experience with the findings on dependence of others. He notes that Thompson et al, using a
self-selected sample reported 1 in 5 showing symptoms of psychological dependence and a similar proportion with
physiological dependence. Submitter comments that because of the self-select sample the percentages indicated
should not be relied on. Submitter compares this with Wilkins et al which used the Severity of Dependence Scale
to derive a 2% estimated rate of dependence potential relative to legal and illegal substances and which would
place BZP on the lower end of dependence. Submitter’s clinical experience has led him to conclude that they
have indeed seen BZP dependence but these have been isolated cases and represent a steady but small
proportion of clients. Submitter also notes that BZP is usually not the primary substance dependence with many
having a history of dependence on other substances. The submitter is not aware of any client for whom BZP is
their sole current substance dependence.
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) considers that research
finding on risk of users developing dependence are limited and inconsistent. However, submitter also notes that in
the past evidence of dependence has not emerged until several years after the drug has become established in a
population.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter considers the well documented post-use hangover (ref Beasley et al) may have the potential benefit of
preventing chronic use and habituation.
Submitter is concerned that long term effects of stimulant use both as a cumulative neurotoxin and as a gateway
to other drug use. He states that Ecstasy (MDMA) has been prevalent for almost 20yrs but only in the last 5 years
is there evidence of permanent brain chemistry changes and memory deficits in even modest users. These
effects are not being screened for currently despite widespread use of BZP. Submitter notes that party pill
advocates warn “(they) ‘’would continue to take herbal highs even if they were made illegal’ and “if you take party
pills away, you could cause people to go back to methamphetamine (Press 12 Dec 2006). In response submitter
says these comments suggest a level of dependence on BZP and other stimulants has been fostered since the
introduction of BZP and notes again SHORE rate of 2% among survey respondents. Submitter notes counter
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
65
Submission
number
Position7
Physical and psychological dependence
argument that legal status of party pills are attracting non-users not necessarily users away from
methamphetamines and is introducing a naïve population to psychoactive drugs. Submitter study found 49% took
BZP in conjunction with ethanol, 15% with marijuana, 13% with NOS, 4% with illicits (MDMA, LSD, Ritalin etc).
This suggests a binge polydrug culture and means any additive effects of drugs in combination should be carefully
considered. Submitter considers single drug use in isolation would represent a very small minority of users.
Policy should recognise the likelihood of warnings being ignored and that some warnings such as drinking plenty
of water may actually be unsafe.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
No specific commentary
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
50
Oppose
54
Oppose
61 & 61a
Oppose
58
Oppose
Submitter (Auckland service provider) considers BZP have lower dependence potential than illicit amphetamines.
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter notes that no attempt is made in research to differentiate between slight withdrawal symptoms and
addiction nor to the possibility of users already being subject to co-dependence on other substances.
Submitter notes that Massey study shows that 46.5 % of users in the last year had only used them 1-2 times in the
previous year, that a further 26.6 % had used them 3-5 times and that 60.8 % of respondents had stopped using
party pills. (nb: this may need checking against the survey). Only 2.2 % of users were classified as dependent in
Massey study based on a Short Dependency Scale test. A ConsumerLink survey (commissioned by STANZ)
shows that no respondents who took party pills (the survey shows 1.2 %) thought it would be difficult or impossible
to stop taking party pills whereas 27.5 % (of alcohol users) thought this would apply to alcohol. 3.6 % of legal party
pill users thought their consumption “was out of control.”
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter notes that addiction (as opposed to misuse) appears to be insignificant. Alcohol and other drug services
have reported that party pills are not an issue for young people, with cannabis and alcohol continuing to make up
the bulk of referrals to services.
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
66
3.7
International classification and experience in other jurisdictions
Context
The EACD found that:
•
•
BZP is not classified in any international drug treaties
there is international interest in NZ experience.
Submission
number
Position8
Classification elsewhere
INDIVIDUALS
No specific commentary
8
3
Support
7
Oppose
27
Oppose
2
Support
19
Oppose
12
Support
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Community group notes that there is a prohibition of sale of “party pills’ in Australia and the USA and support NZ
adopting such prohibition.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitter points to the serious error of data used by the US DEA when making its decision with regard to BZP
and notes that TFMPP remains legal in the US
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) asks that consideration be
given to the impact of the NZ decision on international policy. NZ could be seen to “come in line” or could lead
the way in harm minimisation without prohibition.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter noted that the US DEA review indicated that BZP meets criteria for placement as a Schedule 1
controlled substance and subject to controls and criminal sanctions.
Submitter states that UK treats piperazine salts as a medicine available on prescription only.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter notes that BZP is already banned in USA, Japan, Australia, Denmark and Sweden.
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
67
Submission
number
Position8
54
Oppose
61 & 61a
Oppose
21
Comment
only
Classification elsewhere
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
No specific commentary
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter: in most countries these products are already available legally and that the Netherlands and Canada
have moved towards a harm reduction policy. Agrees the BZP is not classified in any international drug treaties;
Agrees that Australia and USA have made BZP illicit on the basis of little or no experience with BZP; Notes that
BZP products are made in a large number of countries; exports are a function of exchange rate; product (sic)
made in NZ are of a higher standard and subject to manufacturer quality control
STANZ understands BZP was banned in the USA because the DEA believed mistakenly it was ten times more
potent (rather than less potent) than dexamphetamine, and that Australia banned it due to the US ban. Other
countries such as the UK, Netherlands, Norway and other EU member states have not banned BZP.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter notes that UK has recently made it illegal to sell BZP and also notes that BZP is a prohibited
substance in US, Australia and parts of Europe.
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
68
3.8
Other matters raised by EACD
Context
The EACD identified:
•
•
•
•
•
concern about widespread availability
concern about inadequate user information including safety information about presence of TFMPP or other piperazines
support for other demand-influencing policies such as specific taxes
that classification as illegal drugs may prevent users seeking medical assistance
a need to decide if any psychoactive drugs should be legally available in NZ.
Submission
number
5
Support
3
Support
27
9
Position9
Oppose
Other matters raised by EACD
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter concerned that widespread availability implies that use is safe and acceptable and is allowing young
people to be caught up in “party pill” culture putting their future health and education at risk.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Local government community board concerned about the growth in party pill retail outlets in the community that
target sale to young people.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
No specific commentary
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) considers there are 3 policy
options: (1) The EACD proposal (accepting the level and severity of harms warrants prohibition and reclassifying
BZP, analogues and derivatives to class C1); (2) Accepting the level and severity of harms and reclassifying into
another part of Class C; (3) Recognising that BZP does cause moderate harm but limit that harm by introducing,
enforcing and monitoring a strong regulatory regime as provided in MOD Amendment Act 2005. The submitter
discusses the possible effects, benefits, costs, and acceptability of prohibition. The submitter raises three issues:
the likelihood of other legal highs appearing in the market; the proportionality of harms BZP versus alcohol and the
inequity of treatment; and impact of the proposed policy on youth versus older people
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
69
Submission
number
Position9
Other matters raised by EACD
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
2
Support
19
Oppose
14
Comment
only
17
Support
50
Oppose
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter concerned about BZP being marketed as a safe alternative even though these products have
substantial physiologic effects on the body and mind. The submitter considers that the “desired effects” of
enhanced alertness, euphoria and gregariousness are many times outweighed by the risk of more sinister effects
and the submitter contends that BZP should not be considered as a “safer alternative”.
Submitter supports the idea of generating revenue from sale of BZP for purposes of directing those funds towards
treatment and support programmes for users.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter offers suggestions about ways to give better information to users should the government decide against
classification and look to an alternative control mechanisms. Should the government make this decision limiting
sale to community pharmacies this could provide the following benefits:
• Sale by individuals trained to deal with drugs and consequences of misuse;
• Sale by individuals already involved in the management of social harm prevention programme such as
methadone programme and needle exchange.
• Sales managed through clear protocols and guidelines with regular and comprehensive audits.
• Sale by individuals trained to advise and counsel purchasers about: possible dangers of overdose;
symptoms of overdose; side effects; contraindications; the treatment of overdoes and side effects.
• Pharmacies can support any government information programmes.
• Management in the same way as pharmacy only medicines with associated documentation and reporting
• Provide demographic and usage data to assist with future management strategies and made available to
Medsafe.
Should this action be taken the submitter would wish to advise on the management regime.
Submitter is concerned about the widespread availability and the accepted (misinformed) public view of the
acceptability and harmless nature of these substances
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Submitter (service provider) favours the retention of a legal market but is concerned that there is no credible
information about the adverse and unpredictable effects of BZP. Submitter considers reclassification will deliver
the following outcomes: decrease young people’s belief in the asserted potential harmful effects of BZP use; may
result in the supply of more concentrated forms (ref Milton Friedman); will lead to variability in quality; will
significantly increase price; will Increase criminal activity; will not deliver harm minimisation.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
70
Submission
number
Position9
Other matters raised by EACD
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
54
Oppose
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter: notes that recommendations with regard to restrictions fall into the hands of the EACD; considers there
appears to be some confusion as to the role of the EACD as the Chair states the Committee’s mandate was to
provide advice on drug classification and not how the legislation or regulations are frame yet the submitter notes
MODA Act 2005 section 32 which says (b)(ii) if in its view a substance should be a restricted substance, the kind
of prescribed restrictions or requirements (if any) that it may be appropriate to attach to the substance”; agrees
there is no safety information about some additional piperazines that may also be in party pills; agrees tax could
reduce demand on and funding regulatory and enforcement activities but notes that regulations regarding types of
retailers and manufacturers will do the same and more in conjunction with tax; agrees if made illegal BZP users
may not seek medical attention and note that BZP users also using illicit drugs as well as or instead of illicit drugs
may not seek medical attention; Agrees that NZ must decide if it wishes to have a legal market for psychoactive
drugs.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
No specific commentary
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
71
3.9
Other matters raised by Submitters
Submission
number
10
Position10
5
Support
37
Oppose
31
Split view
23
Oppose
46
Oppose
Other matters raised by Submitters
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter who has worked with youth for 20 years is concerned that the unregulated sale of party pills implies
acceptability; encourages youth to participate in “party culture” with resultant long term impact on their education;
and will result in a wider cost to the economy.
Submitter is concerned that heightened public concern about PBST’s is based on misinformation and the
submitter has presented information to “debunk’ the myths put forward. The submitter notes that BZP was
developed before 1944 and prior to being identified as potential anthelmintics and that it has not been used as a
cattle drench. Submitter says piperazine was used as a medical treatment for gout and rheumatoid arthritis in the
late 1890’s.
Submitter considers claims of piperazine as a herbal are fraudulent and would be subject to prosecution under the
Fair Trading Act. Piperazine appears to have been named because of the chemical similarity to piperidine a
constituent of piperine in Piper nigrum but piperazine is not derived from this plant.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
LG council community youth group (12 of whom are opposed to class C1 classification) are concerned that there
is only 1 key manufacturer in NZ and there is a reliance on imported product. They would prefer to have product
manufactured in NZ. They consider BZP risk should be compared with alcohol.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
No specific commentary
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter comments that regulation should be government led and maintains that the existing situation should be
reviewed. Submitter recommends research on assessing the best length of time between taking tablets, and
impacts on neurological development in the young. The submitter also recommends further research regarding the
definition of “safe”.
Submitter (advisory service, advocates on minimising harm, provides information and supports people to access
addiction treatment service) recommends on going research into the effects of long term use of any products
containing BZP and similar.
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
72
Submission
number
Position10
Other matters raised by Submitters
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
2
Support
19
Oppose
20
Support
9
54
Oppose
Oppose
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter concerned about BZP being marketed as a safe alternative even though these products have
substantial physiologic effects on the body and mind. The submitter considers that the “desired effects” of
enhanced alertness, euphoria and gregariousness are many times outweighed by the risk of more sinister effects
and should not be considered as a “safer alternative”.
Submitter points out that decades of resources and funds spent on “war on drugs” has had little impact on rates of
use or availability while there has been disproportionate funding of treatment and support programmes.
Submitter provided reports of retailers stockpiling pills and includes an extract from the NZ Herald Jan 28 2007
which states that manufacturers have developed thousands of BZP alternatives in preparation for an expected
Government ban on BZP and suggests these newer pills are in secure storage awaiting trials and approval.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
No specific commentary
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
No specific commentary
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter who earns living and employs staff concerned that no regard is given to the security of their livelihood.
Submitter comments on the economic impacts of classification noting: 1000 retailers and an estimated 5000
employees; 6 major manufacturers with estimated 60 employees; 30 distributors estimated 90 employees; Risk of
bankruptcies if stores forced to close are obliged to meet lease obligations; Loss of GST, tax revenue, loss of
overseas earnings; Risk of flood of discounted product on the market. Submitter has commented on a number of
reports/press statement and emails. These are summarised below:
SHORE July report; Results produce very little evidence of real harm. Suggest look at reason why 33.2% take
LPP instead of illegal and why 42.5% so that they do not have to use illegal. Survey suggests LPP are helping to
decrease illegal drug use. Suggests also looking at how the dependency information 2.2% would come out if
determined by the (DSM)<(DSM-IV-TR)2000. Notes 39.7% of non-users are against prohibition MRINZ report:
Notes first use memorable with some negative comedown, most taken with friends, frequency use varies greatly
nd
st,
and depends on season, average dose 2.1 per occasion, 2 pill on average 75 minutes after 1 use depended on
level user felt comfortable, most had read label but relied on experience; Most swallowed; Most consumed alcohol
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
73
Submission
number
Position10
Other matters raised by Submitters
but slow down or used to help sober up; Most users know what the ingredients do but often find own comfortable
level of use; Many were reading the packaging; Users considered LPP safe, were aware of the comedown and
had access to drugs in safe way; That decrease use of GHB could be due to regulation or due to LPP use;
Agrees with press release that summarises report as party pills not harmless but few serious short term outcomes
found
NPC letter 24 Nov : Full report not available; Notes NPC calls relating to BZP are 0.135% of all calls suggesting
2.4% of doctors have made any call to NPC; Notes USA decision with regard to BZP was not based on toxicity but
because they have potential for abuse no currently accepted medical use.; Notes Australia reasons for placing
BZP and TFMPP into illegal schedule were due to abuse potential and not based on toxicity; Notes that Baumann
et al test showed mimicking of MDMA but did not show harm; Note that conclusions that 1-benzylpiperazinehas a
stimulant activity similar to dexamphetamine does not mean equally pleasurable and concluded that produced
indistinguishable subjective effects in former addicts; Information not available to substantiate NPC statement that
seizure may occur at recommended doses; Isolated cases of psychoses, neurotoxicity, multiple reports of abuse
and seizure have not been shown to have direct links BZP; Lists three papers Baumann et al 2006,Rothman and
Baumann annals of NY Academy of Sciences vol 1074 Aug 2006, and vol 965 2002 that discuss use of
medications for treatment of cocaine withdrawal symptoms. Confidential draft report 24 Nov Thompson et al
MRINZ: Notes this report is from a trial designed to look at BZP effect on driving but the nature of the research
seems to have changed and the submitter queries if the methodology is appropriate; Expresses concern about the
unavailability of this report; Submitter understands that the trial has users consuming six standard units which
equates to binge drinking and is at a level that could cause alcohol poisoning; Notes that dose of BZP/TFMPP
were 300mg/74mg considers that this is not a recommendation made by the party pill industry; Notes if the dose
were a mixture of Jet and Bliss from Cosmic Corner then there are irregularities as jet contains 85mg of BZP and
10mg TFMPP whereas Bliss contains 50mg per tablet of BZP and 25mg of TFMPP and notes that it would require
taking two of each pill to get to the trial dosage and double the manufacturers’ recommendation; Notes that Frenzy
and Exodus may have been used but table provided by submitter is without data; Notes form a Blog of one of the
participants that participants were without food for 15 hours and raises the suggestion that this may have impacted
the test results; Questions the terminology of severe adverse events in the absence of an agreed Harm
Assessment Matrix; Points to contradictions in the EACD findings and the reports with regard to level of adverse
effects; Notes there is a need to define the industry standard in scientific terms; Trial used number of pills
associated with hospital admissions and should have been done by a sample of packaging in the market; Notes
the marked cardiovascular effect can be achieved through having a run or by taking caffeine or alcohol; Queries
EACD taking into account an incomplete trail that is not peer reviewed.
NZ Medical Journal paper Gee et al Dec 2005: Queries the dosage of the 61 patients who presented on 80
occasions as analysis of pill numbers is not an indicator of dosage; Notes MDMA or amphetamine on their own
could directly lead to a negative outcome. Levin coroner report May 2005; Submitter notes report of a death
involving turbo extreme an ephedrine product used by body builders taken with large amounts of alcohol have
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
74
Submission
number
Position10
Other matters raised by Submitters
adverse effect. Interim ESR report: Notes this report shows significant variability in composition but that overall
tablets have a greater accuracy. Submitter recommends this to be taken into account in determining any further
regulation
Confidential draft report Wilkins et al (SHORE) Submitter has not seen but refers to Consumer Link survey
which is appended to the submission October 2006 report Gee et al: Notes report looks at presentations for
adverse effects to CHCH ED in period Jan 2005 to Aug 2006 but does not differentiate between co-ingestion with
legal or illicit substances; Notes a levelling of attendances since the August peak; Notes the presentations of party
pill users has halved in the past year (Press report Sept 2006); Notes admissions in Auckland being 1.58%
including those of co-ingestion. NZMJ Feb 2007 120
Email 28 Nov from Russell School of Pharmacy: Notes trial was made with 250mgs of BZP
Email 23 Nov Bowden, STANZ: notes and presumably supports the recommendation contained in that email
regarding recommended dosages and other matters Submission by Jacqui Dean on 20 October: submitter
supports the call for more regulation but disagrees with the gateway theory (see earlier comments): notes that
BZP retailers are selling a legal drug culture that is no different from that of alcohol, caffeine, tobacco and sexual
dysfunction products. Submitter recommends the processes as outlined in the European Monitoring Centre for
Drugs and Drug Addiction “Guidelines for risk assessment of new synthetic drugs’ (copy added as an appendix)
and considers if used by the EACD would have led to a more accurate assessment.
Submitter notes the unavailability of 2 major reports in particular the MRINZ report upon which the EACD has
made its decision and considers this taints the procedure.
61 & 61a
Oppose
Economic impact of a ban
Notes MED advice ban of BZP would result in business closures and job losses. STANZ has a submission from
~279 retail stores employing 1191 staff that banning BZP would seriously affect their business and cause job
losses, and notes other businesses have not been adequately consulted.
Criminal Justice Capacity
MOH advice also noted criminal justice implications of a ban, including a need for additional enforcement capacity
for Police, Customs and the Courts (or delayed trials), technical evidence of the drug’s constituency, and impacts
on individuals of convictions.
21
Comment
STANZ questions the relevance of comments by EACD about a link between BZP and New Zealand’s culture of
risky alcohol consumption.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter notes that BZP is normally distributed by mail and this may make it difficult to regulate if reclassification
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
75
Submission
number
32
58
Position10
Other matters raised by Submitters
only
occurs. Submitter also notes that there are risks to NZ reputation both with the continued status and if
reclassification occurs. Currently New Zealand has the reputation as the primary supplier of BZP-based products
and has exported to the UK. On the other hand reclassification could see NZ companies continue to market
through the internet while transferring manufacture off shore as there is a lack of uniform international controls in
the Pacific. This could affect NZ’s reputation in the Pacific region. Submitter says monitoring of import/export of
BZP and related substances is challenging but work is being undertaken to allow for ready identification. Current
estimates are that 1600kgs of BZP was imported into NZ in the period June-Dec 2006). No increase in the levels
of importation post the announcement of a review of the status of BZP has been identified. Submitter will liaise
with manufactures should reclassification proceed.
Impacts of reclassification: Submitter states that if accorded C1 status BZP would be given similar investigative
priority as any other C1 substance and considers there will be some logistical impact if the level of illicit
imports/exports remains high. Impacts will be in front-line detection, need for specific testing kits, increased
demand for identification services and retraining of staff. The submitter points out the potential impact on drug
investigation resources.
Submitter raises issues relating to the timing of reclassification and implications for the submitter including the
need to allow sufficient time for: development of a strategy to manage stockpiles before reclassification,
implementing changes to the National Intelligence Application Information Technology system to allow for the
creation of new offences, offence codes and interface with the Courts Management System; training and internal
communication with enforcement staff; informing other potentially affected groups such as legal services, youth
services and district crime groups. Submitter notes that reclassification will expand the number of drugs that police
are able to search for and seize. The operational impact and costs of these depends on other competing
operational requirements. Submitter warns against creating unrealistic expectations around enforcement.
Submitter comments: the long term effects of BZP use are unknown; the committee’s view on proven safety before
release are interesting. They beg the question; what process exists for manufacturers of legal recreational drugs to
prove the safety of their products? And is it possible for the manufacturers to resubmit products to the Committee
or to the Minister in the light of new evidence that the therapeutic or recreational status bears no relationship to its
ability to cause harm? The submitter acknowledges that the Committee is required to consider therapeutic value
however, the submitter considers that the Committee should inform its decision in the first instance by the National
Drug Policy’s imperative to reduce harm. The submitter notes that a culture of drug use based on the consumption
of alcohol and tobacco and to a lesser extent cannabis already existed well before arrival of BZP products and
BZP is one of many drugs commonly used by young New Zealanders. The submitter believes that consideration
should be given to the record of the UK Parliamentary Science and Technology Select Committee of June 2006
which discusses anomalies and inconsistency of outcome in the ABC classification system…the lack of evidence
for the deterrent effect which underpins the classification policy…and concludes that the classification system is
not fit for purpose and should be replaced with a more scientifically based scale of harm, decoupled from penalties
Support
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
76
Submission
number
60
Position10
Support
Other matters raised by Submitters
for possession and trafficking.
Submitter notes that change in classification may increase young people needing youth justice services and CYF
interventions (to respond to arrests in the 13 to 16 age group). However, in reference to the EACD comment that
scheduling Fantasy reduced usage, notes that scheduling BZP may also reduce use.
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
77
3.10 Alternative regulatory regimes
Submission
number
11
Position11
56
Oppose
31
Split view
19
Oppose
Alternative regulatory regime
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter attached an article from Free Radical in support of submission. The article noted that existing law
prevents discerning users from using illegal and safer alternatives to alcohol which causes more hospitalisation
and death than all the illicit drug use combined. It further noted that the law prevents research into better and safer
recreational drugs; and recommended eventual repeal of the MOD Act and in the interim to make all drugs safer
than alcohol legal.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Twelve out of 17 members of this youth group wished to retain Class D status with the following restrictions:
remain restricted to 18+years; adequate warnings provided; sales restricted to a controlled environment and
timeframe; provision made for return of unused pills; dosage control; quality monitoring and control (filter drugs?);
and better control over illegal drugs.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
No specific commentary
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
No specific commentary
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter calls for a new process by which new “lifestyle” and “recreational” agents can be appropriately reviewed,
regulated or controlled. Submitter suggest a new sub-division of the pharmaceutical act (similar to UK) to
incorporate agents that are chemically active but used only for recreational use and which could be sold as
pharmacy only. Onus would be placed on companies to prove; safe dosing; through properly formed clinical trials
;safe manufacturing standards, fit for human consumption; responsible packaging including blister packs and
maximum dose sales, to reduce risk of overdose; appropriate and full health warnings. This alternative regime
could be taxed with funds used for education programmes about recreational drug use; treatment programmes for
those who get into difficulties and for funding enforcement.
Regulation should be similar to Misuse of Alcohol legislation addressing: age restricted sales; penalties targeted at
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
78
Submission
number
20
Position11
Support
Alternative regulatory regime
the seller not the purchaser, penalties for supplying minors; increased penalties for crimes committed under the
influence, penalties for driving under the influence (drive clean policy).
Submitter considers policy should be developed around the reality that NZ public perceive a need for recreational
drug availability. Evidence of this is the successful sale of 27million units of BZP (no source provided) and
flourishing existence of Party Pill shops. Purchase is a conscious decision of informed adults. The policy should
provide for the future which will include new everyday designer drugs, availability of psycho-active plant botanicals
and responsive to drugs such as MDMA being reclassified for pharmaceutical use as, the submitter says, is being
considered in the US for post-traumatic stress disorder.
Account needs also to be taken of the fact that
pharmaceutical companies are looking for “lifestyle” and “smart drugs” to be available over the counter. Submitter
says that Viagra and Cialis are already openly part of the party pill scene and Modafinil and Donepezil are openly
used by medical students studying for exams.
New regulation can be justified by recognising that the benefits associated with BZP availability outweigh the
harms when compared with the benefits and harm of alcohol and tobacco. Points provided in support are:
responsible governance is about minimising potential harms; NZ already condones alcohol which causes
significantly more harm than BZP and has a direct dose related effect of coma and death in acute use and has
significant morbidity and mortality in chronic use; there is little argument about making alcohol C1 even though
alcohol is : responsible for 70% of police callouts; 75% of adult night time presentations to hospital ED (Thursday
to Sunday); involved with 25% of all rapes; is addictive ;has significant impact on pre-existing mental and health
illnesses. (Data not sourced). Submitter considers there is very little evidence that BZP use is associated with
crime or violence and Wellington ED database of clinical presentations shows for every 100 alcohol presentations
per month, there is only 1 presentation for all other drugs combined, including opiates (excluding deliberate
overdoses which largely use prescription medications (in 2006 to Wgtn ED there were 99 paracetamol overdoses
number of BZP presentations unknown).
Submitter compares the regulatory regime for BZP and Paracetemol and suggests that BZP needs regulation with
regard to dose standards, packaging and health warnings to bring BZP on a par with paracetamol regulation.
(Submitter declares no conflict of interest)
Submitter who works in the ED of Christchurch hospital supports the classification Class C1 for BZP, analogues,
precursors and related substances. The submitter calls for regulation of all previously unregulated psychoactive
substances including designer drugs and non-indigenous plant materials and suggests this be achieved through
amendment to the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act 2005. The submitter noted that the amendment should
stipulate that any psychoactive substance sold or distributed for human consumption must have evidence
presented to the EACD to attest as to the safety of the product for consumption, such evidence to be no less than
that required for food, dietary substances or complementary medicines and consistent with the Consumer
Guarantees act 1993 requirement the goods sold must be safe, of acceptable quality, and fit for any particular
purpose. The submitter indicated that the onus to produce evidence lies with the applicant/supplier/retailer;
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
79
Submission
number
Position11
17
Support
51
Oppose
Alternative regulatory regime
Licenses for distribution may be granted if safety criteria are met and there is an associated program of monitoring
quality and adverse effects. The submitter noted that possession of psychoactive substances by individuals need
not be treated as unlawful except where there is a clear intent to sell or otherwise distribute prior to safety vetting.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter has attached an article by Gee and Fountain 2007 in support of their submission.
This article notes that the EACD approach to standards is the reverse of that which applies to pharmaceuticals.
They further note that studies so far report such high levels of adverse reaction which if occurred with a
prescription medicine would require that medicine to be withdrawn. G and F ask if it is necessary to await severe
illness, neurological damage or death before risk of harm is established. They further question why this should be
so given the lack of therapeutic benefit. G and F in their article say that if a legal market for psychoactive drugs is
established in NZ a responsible approach must be applied prior to release. In particular safety (rather than
apparent lack of toxicity) must be proven; with the onus to provide scientifically robust evidence placed on the
suppliers of these substances; vigorous standards must be applied and enforced regarding manufacture,
packaging and sale; effective ongoing national post-marketing surveillance established.
Submitter (British Columbia public health physicians) opposed to prohibition and recommends a tight regulatory
framework. Their paper discusses the spectrum of policy approaches for drug control; reviews the types of harms
created by the policy frameworks’ suggests the balance point for public health policies for currently illegal drugs is
that which minimises the prevalence of harmful use and negative health impacts and also minimises any indirect
or collateral harms to society form regulatory sanctions. They argue that public health harm reduction strategies
are compromised by criminal status of drugs in popular use. They consider that for Canada the time is right to
remove criminal penalties for drug possession for personal use and to place current illegal drugs into a tight
regulatory framework to help programs to assist those engaged in harmful drug use and to reduce unintended
drug-related harm to society.
Submitters acknowledge that harmful effects can occur with any psychoactive drug. They consider harms to the
individual and society vary according to substance and its pharmacological effects, concentration, mode of use,
circumstances of use, ease of production. They note the direct harmful effects could include physiological:
(death, toxic effects, dependency, communicable diseases, injury, violence, malnutrition, fetal damage,
neurological damage); psychological: (depression, psychosis, impaired thinking); social (stigmatization,
marginalisation, criminalisation, family breakdown, social system breakdown, lost productivity, workplace time
loss, injuries, production loss, direct health care costs). Indirect harmful effects to society occur from the loss of
fully functioning individual members and from the fact that certain drugs are criminalised. Costs include increased
health and social services costs, increased criminal justice costs lost productivity of workers. Additional harms
from illegal drugs: marginalisation, loss of social cohesion, criminal activity, local violence, impact on businesses
and neighbourhoods, direct enforcement costs, opportunity costs. The submitters offer a diagram to represent the
full spectrum of psychoactive substance use ranges between benefit and harm and suggest a spectrum of policy
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
80
Submission
number
61 & 61a
Position11
Oppose
Alternative regulatory regime
approaches.
The paper: compares harms due to illegal drugs, tobacco, alcohol and argues that there are benefits of drug use
noting that people use substances for anticipated beneficial effects and lists those benefits as physical,
psychological, social, economic. It suggests a drug control policy spectrum. It notes the two extremes legal, forprofit commercial economy and a criminal-prohibition, black market economy. It suggests a public health
approach which focuses on health promotion, prevention of disease or injury, reducing disability and premature
mortality, incorporates individual and societal health protection and promotes physical environments and social
policy frameworks that maximise health and minimise individual and community harms. It suggests guiding
principles that could be applied in a public health approach viz: do no harm; informed consent; individuals have a
right to grow, produce and are responsible for quality and risks; traders can operate within regulated parameters,
responsible for information to consumers, bear liability for withholding information or misleading consumers;
promotion and advertising for psychoactive drugs is not permitted unless of relatively low harm eg caffeine. It
suggests a framework for action including goal and objectives. It suggests the objectives of the framework can be
achieved through: education; prevention, protection and health promotion; treatment and rehabilitation;
enforcement; strategies, programs and services. Discusses barriers to implementation;. Discusses learning from
history. Recommends actions for the Canadian government.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
No specific commentary
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
STANZ encourages the use of regulation on manufacture and sale to ensure the risk of harm from BZP “remains
low”. STANZ concerned that MoH has advised it “is not resourced for further BZP enforcement activities and
compliance with the MDAA is not currently a priority for the Police”.
STANZ has submitted proposed regulations under the MDAA as an alternative to a ban.
In 2004 STANZ expressed concern about under 18 year olds accessing BZP, and began developing a voluntary
code to control this, and expressed support for the government moves to regulate BZP. “STANZ fully supported
making BZP a restricted substance so that it could be properly regulated... and made a submission that it should
be included” as a restricted substance.
Regulations restricted supply to people over 18 years of age, prohibited free supply and imposed some advertising
restrictions.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
81
Submission
number
Position11
Alternative regulatory regime
STANZ notes that EACD noted both public perception of people under 18 using party pills and evidence that this
occurs, but notes that the public perception is not a relevant consideration.
With regard to the interim report from ESR, notes it has found ESR pinpointing of exact levels of one or more
phenylpiperazines among other components in a tablet sample is difficult and wide margin of error, and in any
event inconsistency between stated and actual BZP content found by the testing could be addressed by
manufacturing standards.
STANZ submitted (letter to the Minister dated 9 June 2005) that the Minister should also regulate a maximum
dose per pill of 200mg and per pack of 600mg. A further letter (2 November 2005) again asked for regulation to
control the sale of BZP pills with high doses or in powder form.
Control of the form could also prevent any developments of further intravenous use.
Public perceptions of safety are not relevant, but the safety or quality review could be introduced by regulations.
EACD considered that regulation could be more effective than a ban, with restriction, including on sale, advertising
and supply, and taxation. Difficulties with administration and enforcement are challenged as reasons not to follow
this course, and STANZ suggests the cost of these may be higher with a ban than regulation.
Regulations should or could include:
• a maximum dose per pill of 200mg and per pack of 600mg
• clear and accurate labelling
• BZP raw material used to be at least 99 per cent pure
• No harmful ingredients
• Controls on manufacture
• No sales of BZP raw powder to consumers
• Sales only from premises where entry is restricted to persons aged over 18 years or from licensed
premises excluding convenience stores or supermarkets
• Ban on sales of BZP within 250 metres of a school, recreational centre or playground
• Limit advertising to within premises BZP is sold and entry is restricted to persons aged over 18 years, and
not visible from the street
• Restrict advertising that overstates or glorifies the benefits of use, or suggests BZP products are benign
• Require packaging health warnings including importance of drinking plenty of water, not mixing with
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
82
Submission
number
Position11
Alternative regulatory regime
alcohol and not exceeding the recommended dose.
22
Oppose
Massey study also recommended a maximum dose per pill of piperazine and a limit on the number of pills per
pack, with clear product instructions about when to use recovery pills. A code of good manufacturing practice is
also recommended to address quality control, testing and analysis, training, complaints, tracing procedures, record
keeping and hygiene.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
Submitter (UK based drug policy foundation) supports finding better ways to regulate lower-risk drugs. Submitter
declares they are not advocates for business interests with their only concern being to call for effective regulation
of potentially harmful recreational drugs.
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
No specific commentary
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
83
3.11 EACD Recommendations 1 and 3
The EACD recommended that BZP be classified under Schedule 3 Part 1 (Class C1) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 and consequently
removed from Schedule 4 of the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act 2005 in order that it no longer be a restricted substance
Submission
number
5
6
13
48
59
3
29
31
4
Recommendations 1 and 3 - SUPPORT
INDIVIDUALS
Youth worker supports classification and is opposed to free availability because it implies use is safe, encourages party lifestyle
with long term impact on education. Notes use of NOS declined with reduced availability.
Supports herbals becoming Classified class C1
Supports the immediate classification of BZP products and the consequent removal from Schedule 4 and recommends
immediate drafting of an OIC to be referred to the Health Select committee and approved by the GG to be brought into effect no
more than 6 months after GG signature
Submitter (4 school counsellors) support the call to reclassify BZP as a Class C1 Drug. They consider the current legal status
encourages children to form the view that BZP use is acceptable and that drug taking is normal. In summary submitters
consider BZP is far too easy to obtain; carries little stigma; has a popular image that it is “harmless”; and attracts users who may
otherwise avoid illicit drugs. Submitters acknowledge that reclassification will not solve all the problems but hope that its use
would be reduced by young (18yrs or school age) and most at risk students.
Submitter opposes use of party pills and supports classification ending their sale in NZ.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Community group supports control as this should stop the growth in “party pill” retail outlets that the Council cannot limit under its
district plan.
A community organisation dedicated to helping people deal with issues of alcohol/drug abuse and addiction supports making
BZP illegal and subject to penalties because of the negative health, psychological and social impacts of BZP use.
A local council community youth group responded on behalf of 17 of its members. Two of these members supported the
proposal.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitter supports classification
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
84
Submission
number
28
2
12
17
36
18
49
11
15
21
Recommendations 1 and 3 - SUPPORT
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
Submitter which delivers health promotion and health protection services on behalf of several DHB supports the reclassification
to Class C1.
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter supports control as piperazines are dangerous drugs that should not be self administered without professional
oversight. The likely co- ingestion with other toxic substances is further reason for control.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter supports the proposal to reclassify BZP as a class C drug.
Submitter supports the proposal to classify BZP and TFMPP as class C1 controlled drugs
Submitter represents over 3000 pharmacists and supports the recommendation to classify BZP and its analogues and
derivatives. They see no argument to use BZP in society as it is a psychoactive drug with no therapeutic value. Submitter
accepts that prohibiting BZP may drive its use underground or tempt users to upgrade to methamphetamine for their stimulation,
but considers that making BZP a C1 controlled drug will dissuade most users and potential users.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Submitter supports the proposal to reclassify BZP as a class C drug.
Submitter (Christchurch Community Alcohol and Drug Service providing assessment and counselling to people 18+) supports
the proposal to make BZP and related piperazines illegal and subject to penalties under MODA 1975 because: Clients perceive
the product to be safe; Production and labelling is unregulated; easy access means it is not viewed as a drug; there is a lack of
education and knowledge about the effects, side effects and contraindications; the service regularly assesses clients with
intravenous use of BZP which increases harm; there are many increased physical and mental health complications (yet to be
researched and recorded); BZP is sold in liquor outlets with no message that it is okay to have alcohol with BZP.
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
A petition organised by the DHB public Health Unit posed two options to petitioners: classification or tighter regulation. 729
individuals signed the petition of these 480 (65.8%) supported classification
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter represents 2,300 operators and businesses involved with the hospitality industry that employ approx 30,000 people.
The submitter supports the recommendation that BZP and related substances be classified C1.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter makes no comment on the recommendation but comments on several potential outcomes regarding consumer
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
85
Submission
number
32
60
Submission
number
1
24
25
26
35
Recommendations 1 and 3 - SUPPORT
behaviour. Firstly, the suppliers will replace BZP with new yet uncontrolled substances with implication for enforcement and
monitoring. A further potential outcome is that the on-going demand for stimulants and euphorics will be filled by an increased
demand for illicit drugs such as MDMA and methamphetamine which would have a potential impact on Police, Customs and
Justice. Submitter also considers there will be a residual black market for BZP fuelled by domestic stockpiles and further points
out the potential for illegal importations as BZP is not a controlled substance in all countries and may be sourced more easily
than other substances. Submitter also considers that BZP may be sold disguised as the more attractive MDMA and
amphetamines.
Submitter supports the proposal to reclassify. Submitter states that the benefits of reclassification are that it will quell concern
(trans-Tasman and international) about NZ’s potential ability to become a primary supplier of BZP and enable action to be taken
to stop legal party pill shops being used as a “cover” for dealing in Ecstasy, methamphetamine and other hard drugs. Submitter
sees potential for reclassification to reduce harm by reducing the potential adverse effects on driver behaviour and
unpredictability when taken with alcohol.
Submitter supports reclassification as a measure to reduce harm to children and young people from BZP use. This will occur as
a result of reduced availability and increased personal and financial costs of illegal use.
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Recommendation 1 and 3 – OPPOSE
INDIVIDUALS
Individual is opposed to BZP being made a Class C1 drug because his personal use resulted in therapeutic benefit (depressive
symptoms, social phobia eased) where other treatments have failed.
Submitter group made a form submission which stated their opposition because the costs and resources of enforcing the proposal
and the cost of BZP will increase. They favour investment in education.
Submitter group of nursing students made a form submission which stated their opposition because an increasing number of
users will end up being prosecuted by police and it will bring users in contact with organised crime with the risk of worse health as
misinformed people overdose or mix BZP with other drugs. Submitter believes BZP users will move to other drugs.
Submitter is opposed because there have been no deaths as a result of BZP and the submitter considers users may turn to more
dangerous illicit drugs.
Submitter (occasional BZP user currently undertaking a PhD on needle exchanges) is opposed because he considers regulation
and associated taxation is a more sustainable and productive means of reducing demand and he raises issues regarding the
negative effects of unsafe use or misfortunes of physiology.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
86
Submission
number
37
43
55
56
57
31
Recommendation 1 and 3 – OPPOSE
Submitter (risk and policy analyst, personal submission based on information obtained from work funded by STANZ) is opposed to
classification on the basis that moderate risk of harm has not been demonstrated and that the EACD has not defined what a
moderate level of risk is, nor undertaken a formal risk analysis to arrive at such a conclusion. The submitter is concerned that
classification has the potential to disrupt commerce and research as there are hundreds of phenyl and benzyl piperazines
compounds used widely. Submitter has calculated the risk of harm is diminutive and shows adverse effects have not been proven
to be caused by BZP used as recommended. Submitter states that the effects identified in those who have used BZP are no
greater than background levels expected in the population. In support of his submission the submitter attached 32 various figures,
tables, graphs, histograms.
Submitter (anonymous as declared user of ecstasy) is opposed to classification, considers it unreasonable to ban BZP because
there is a small risk of death. Submitter considers increasing the age of purchase would be more appropriate than a total ban and
calls for greater enforcement of sale to minors of all drugs including alcohol. Submitter considers that criminalization will lead to a
shift to more dangerous substances such as ecstasy and methamphetamine. BZP is currently used because it is legal, relatively
cheap, users know what they are getting, and it produces a reasonable high. When choosing, users trade this off against illegal,
harder to obtain, probably more expensive substances and the risk of being sold caffeine instead of a pill containing PMA.
Submitter is opposed (worker in a retail shop). From personal observation and discussion with customers she has formed the view
that many use legal party pills as an alternative to using more harmful substances and if made illegal would buy other illegal drugs
or black market party pills. She considers the product to be relatively harmless. Submitter says proposal will put money into untaxed criminal hands; prevent regulation of age restriction and product control; remove opportunity for education at point of sale;
put her employment at risk; churn young people through prison, and in similar way to the cannabis laws give many criminal
records.
Submitter is opposed to a ban on BZP and supplied a copy of an article by Richard Goode on page 14 of March/April edition of
The Free Radical. This article maintains that prohibition won’t work and notes that party pill use may decline but people will get
high on something else such as methamphetamine and ecstasy. It further notes that party pills will become more expensive and
more dangerous. The article gives the view that if the government were interested in harm minimisation then it would encourage
substitution of alcohol with new designer drugs with a view to eventual displacement as BZP effects are more benign than alcohol.
Submitter (non-user having tried once and disliking the experience) is opposed to the suggestion of putting BZP pills in the same
category as cannabis because it is unnecessary and counter-productive. Submitter has not observed ill-effects through their
personal experience with people who use BZP. Submitter is opposed to prohibition of any substance that people take for pleasure
unless it can be proven that it does harm and believes the ban would lead to an unregulated black market.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
A local council community youth group responded on behalf of 17 of its members. Twelve of these members opposed the
proposal. They favoured retention of Class D restrictions. Their reasons are that the product can assist shy people, there are
social benefits, the product is not proven to be dangerous, the product has not killed anyone.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
87
Submission
number
7
47
23
27
45
46
19
51
Recommendation 1 and 3 – OPPOSE
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitter who is undertaking long term research is concerned that restricting access to BZP and TFMPP will cause a shift back to
potentially harmful substances. They suggest considering the role of BZP like compounds in minimising the risk of greater harm.
Submitter (researcher alcohol drugs and addiction treatment and specialist clinical psychologist, adviser to community alcohol and
drug service) is opposed to classification on the grounds that the harms identified are not sufficient to classify piperazines as a
Class C1 substance. In summary the submitter notes that the frequency of adverse events is low; the unpleasant ‘hangover”
appears to dissuade many from continuing use; and the rate of adverse events seems to be reducing since 2004
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (Community youth group Wellington) is opposed to reclassification because prohibition is unlikely to reduce harm; it will
negatively impact on users and suppliers; users may continue to use illegally and hence risk criminal action; and the purity, quality
and safety of the pills may be reduced through criminal elements sourcing and supplying.
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) recommends against the proposal on the
grounds that the costs outweigh the benefits; the harms to existing and future users may be as serious as the health harms of the
current widespread use of piperazines; and manufacturing and retail would move into the uncontrolled criminal illegal sector
Submitter is an umbrella network group made up of 350 individual members and organisations who work across the youth health
and development sectors and include a range of clinicians and researchers. The network opposes reclassification on the basis of
harm minimisation. Issues raised were that banning would force sales underground and undermine efforts to monitor content,
purchasers, quantity purchased, and circumstances of purchase.
Submitter (advisory service advocates on minimising harm, provides information and supports people to access addiction
treatment service) opposes classification. However, in submission also explains that the Association ran 7 LOAD forums
throughout the South Island to gain feedback from the AOD sector and related health professionals. The forums which involved a
presentation on BZP followed by discussion did not result in a clear consensus. .In most forums 40% supported the move to
Schedule C. One meeting voted overwhelmingly in favour. Submitter attached a summary of the discussions as an appendix to the
submission which consistent with submissions 27 and 47 recommends against the proposal.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter,(specialist in emergency medicine with sub-speciality interest in addiction, also lead investigator in WA drink spiking
study (public pending) ) does not support reclassification.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter (public health physicians British Columbia) submitted a report on issues relate to psychoactive substance. The report
points out the harms of prohibition and suggests approaches by which psychoactive substances can be regulated to protect public
health. They consider public health based regulatory approaches to psychoactive substances should be enhanced and the
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
88
Submission
number
40
50
10
9
30
44
52
53
54
Recommendation 1 and 3 – OPPOSE
prohibition based approaches should be avoided due to their lack of effectiveness and their potential to create harm.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Submitter (provider of alcohol and drug treatment services) says they understand the harm resulting from use of party pills and the
way people respond when substances are made illegal therefore do not support classification.
Submitter (largest provider of drug treatment, counselling and training services in Auckland area) is opposed because there is no
evidence that classification will reduce BZP availability, use or potential risk and classification may in fact increase risk. Submitter
(service provider) considers reclassification may lead to users seeking more harmful controlled drugs as substitutes;
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
Submitter representing an emergency service supports classification.
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter is opposed to classification and considers it will fail and in a similar way to cannabis use will result in young people
sourcing substances from gangs who will supply BZP or methamphetamine instead.
Submitter who has applied self-regulation in restricting sale to 18 years plus is opposed to classification. Based on feedback from
their customers they say customers will turn to illicit drugs if party pills are banned. Submitter considers a ban would be dangerous
as the demand will not go away and customers will be obliged to purchase from those with criminal affiliations and from people
that also market P and methamphetamines.
Submitter is opposed to reclassification because a ban can result in more people using it (gains notoriety,) and can cause the use
of more harmful substitute drugs. Submitter undertook an informal poll of customers 100% of whom said they would use illegal
drugs if legal party pills were banned.
Submitter with 9187 signatures attached (note unclear if this number includes Axl Rose USA and Snoop Dog; a further 700+
signatures obtained through the website arrived after submission deadline) Submitter opposes banning because party pills are a
legal alternative to harder illicit drugs. Submitter considers health risks are best managed by regulation. Submitter maintains that
banning may reduce but not eliminate demand which allows organised crime to take over the marketing and banning BZPs may
encourage party pill users to turn to illicit drugs. Submitter considers that the health risk associated with illegal party pills use is
likely to increase
Submitter (same as 52) plus 279 signatures from other retailers (collected over three week period) opposes banning because in
addition to points made in 52 above the ban will impact on the business and employment of an estimated 6,493 people, many of
whom will face redundancy. Submitter also contends that banning will confiscate property rights without the government having
made a bona fide attempt to regulate BZP as a restricted substance.
Submitter is opposed as there is no evidence that making BZP a controlled substance will reduce the availability or risk of harm.
Submitter considers there are bodies already established to administer and enforce restriction although these bodies could be
better co-ordinated. Submitter maintains that continued prohibition has not proven effective in controlling society’s drug problems.
Submitter attached eleven appendices in support of comments made.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
89
Submission
number
61 & 61a
Recommendation 1 and 3 – OPPOSE
Opposes. Submits that a product does not have to be “safe” to avoid classification, and that BZP should remain a restricted
substance, with proper enforcement of the MDAA (sic). Cites news reports that suppliers of illicit street drugs are incorporating
BZP into their products. A BZP ban is a high policy risk, as it may increase harm from drugs, driving supply underground,
increasing risk of improper use and use of “P” and other harmful drugs. Cites the EACD that there is no evidence BZP decreasing
demand for methamphetamine, and further evidence needed to determine if there is a safe dose limit. STANZ submits that this is
not the test required to decide whether to classify a drug.
Lack of proof substances meet test for “moderate harm”
Suggests EACD has not attempted to define the meaning of “moderate risk of harm” or to establish a clear risk analysis
methodology, or to provide advice on how or why the matters it listed supported its recommendations.
Says the evidence does not show that BZP is addictive to a level that poses a moderate risk of harm, or that it has the potential to
cause death.
22
33
“…under the MDA, the Minister cannot exercise his power to recommend classification of a drug unless there is sufficient evidence
that it poses at least a moderate risk of harm. Drugs that pose a low risk of harm cannot be classified.”
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
Submitter (UK based drug policy foundation declared to have no advocacy role with business interests) considers there are costs
associated with prohibition with only political benefits. Costs are seen to be potential for creation of an illegal marker for a market
that have an established level of demand; profit diversion from legitimate and taxed to criminal gangs and unregulated dealers;
increased risk/harm to users from drugs of unknown strength and purity and without health and safety information; removal of
potential harm reduction gains by diverting recreational users away from more dangerous illicit drugs such as amphetamines and
MDMA and its analogues; criminalisation of users (youth); and increased enforcement costs.
Submitter quotes the findings of the UK Parliamentary Science and Technology Select Committee which found “no solid evidence
to support the existence of a deterrent effect, despite the fact that it appears to underpin the government’s policy on classification.
In view of the importance of drugs policy and the amount spent on enforcing the penalties associated with the classification
system, it is highly unsatisfactory that there is so little knowledge about the system’s effectiveness”
Submitter (retired police officer with 14 years experience in undercover narcotics and executive director of a non-profit educational
organisation that advocates against prohibition. Membership 7000 in 66 countries including 150 former drug-warriors; police and
corrections officer, judges, prosecutors, DEA and FBI agents) submitted the text of a talk entitled End Prohibition Now ) and
suggests consideration be given to looking at the promo on www.leap.cc.
Submitter is opposed to making drugs illegal and calls for alternative policies that will lower the incidence of death, disease, crime
and addictions. Submitter calls for the legalisation of all drugs and thus allow for more effective regulation.
Submitter considers that prohibition leads to a path to despair because it creates an underground market filled by criminal
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
90
Submission
number
Recommendation 1 and 3 – OPPOSE
entrepreneurs; artificially inflates the price e.g. cannabis worth more than gold and heroin more than uranium; nothing can be
controlled or regulated when it is illegal; and any control and regulation is transferred to the criminals including how it produced,
where it will be sold and to what age group.
34
42
58
39
Submitter describes his view of the outcome of 37 years of prohibition and war on drugs in the US and says this is evidence of
failed policy. Submitter notes that the US legislation and policies have led to costs over a trillion tax dollars; 37 million arrests for
non-violent drug offences; increasingly punitive sentencing resulting in a quadrupled prison population; 2.2 million citizens are
confined and every year another 1.9 million people arrested for non-violent drug offences. The submitter states that despite the
money spent, and people’s lives destroyed, illicit drugs are cheaper, more potent, easier for children to access then they were in
1970, people are dying in the street; drug barons and terrorists grow richer; and incidents of crime, drug addiction and juvenile
drug use have worsened.
Submitter (group campaigning against marijuana prohibition) is opposed because there is insufficient evidence of significant risk to
public health. They note that there are few hospital admissions; no deaths; and hospitalisation has generally occurred in
conjunction with alcohol. Submitter contends there is a risk of negative public health effects of BZP reclassification and points out
that 1 in 5 NZers have tried BZP, most consumed alcohol as well as BZP, a black market would be born over night, former BZP
users may switch to more harmful substances; and the opportunity for quality control would be lost.
Submitter (made on behalf of a Christchurch based group) is opposed because they consider prohibition won’t work; use will
continue as with cannabis and methamphetamine; illicit party pills will become more dangerous as strength, composition and
quality will no longer be controlled and a BZP related death will be caused because of prohibition. Submitter maintains that legal
BZP could be used to practice harm reduction principles by placing in Schedule 4 and this will give user education credibility.
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter (government department of youth policy specialists) undertook a qualitative cost benefit analysis of three options (i)
retaining status quo, (ii) increased regulation within current classification, and (iii) reclassifying BZP to Class C status. Based on
this analysis the Ministry expresses concern about the proposal to reclassify because there is little evidence to suggest that
criminalisation will (i) decrease possible harm for young people associated with BZP use and indeed criminalising BZP may cause
more harm for young people than maintaining the status quo, (ii) the EACD recommendation does not consider the social and
developmental costs to young people convicted of a drug offence, nor does it consider the increased operational costs to
Customs, Police and Justice
POLITICAL PARTY
Submitter opposes reclassification because it considers prohibition is a head in the sand policy in the face of all evidence to the
contrary. Submitter considers prohibition appears to produce rather than reduce supply and demand resulting in a black market.
Submitter contends that prohibition results in disrespect for the rule of law, and serious disproportionate harm to individuals and
society via criminalisation.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
91
3.12 EACD Recommendation 2
The EAC recommended that the classification of BZP and related substances as Class C1 drugs should cover all known analogues and
derivatives of benzylpiperazine that have no known therapeutic use.
Submission
number
12
Position12
5
13
Support
Support
37
Opposed
55
Opposed
29
Supports
4
Supports
7
Oppose
28
Supports
Recommendation 2
INDIVIDUALS
Supports control over all “herbals, party pills”
Supports immediate classification of all known derivatives of BZP that have no therapeutic value and requests the
immediate drafting of an OIC to be brought into effect no more than 6 months after the GG signature
Submitter is opposed and is concerned that classification has the potential to disrupt commerce and research as
there are hundreds of phenyl and benzyl piperazine substances that are used widely. Submitter says there are a
large number of piperazines derivatives developed and screened as pharmaceutical compounds including:
antihistamines, antimalarial, antifilarial and the like, and modern drugs such as Viagra.
Opposes restriction on related sales.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Submitter supports all known analogues to be illegal and subject to penalties because of the negative health,
psychological and social impacts.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitter considers all psychoactive drugs with potential for abuse should be required to undergo assessment like
similar pharmaceutical agents.
Submitter who is undertaking long term research is concerned that restricting access to BZP and TFMPP will
cause a shift back to potentially harmful substances. They suggest consideration of the role of BZP like
compounds in minimising the risk of greater harm.
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
No specific commentary
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
Submitter group (which delivers health promotion and health protection services on behalf of several DHB)
supports the reclassification to Class C1. of all DHB related substances
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
92
Submission
number
Position12
2
20
Supports
Supports
17
36
Supports
Supports
61 & 61a
Opposes
Recommendation 2
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Control should apply to all analogues and derivatives of benzylpiperazine
Submitter supports classification
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter support the proposal to restrict all known analogues and derivatives of BZP and TFMPP
Submitter represents over 3000 pharmacists and supports the recommendation to classify BZP and its analogues
and derivatives.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
No specific commentary
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Recommendation to classify all known analogues and derivatives has no evidence to support it as research relied
on has only been done on BZP and TFMPP and there is no research on the level of harm of related substances.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
No specific commentary
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
No specific commentary
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
93
3.13 EACD Recommendation 4
The EACD recommended that work continues to further develop the regulatory framework and enforcement capacity that would support
the restricted substances provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act 2005
Submission
number
13
Position13
13
Supports
25
Opposes
26
Opposes
37
Opposes
43
Opposes
Recommendation 4
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter supports ban on advertising in all forms of media, radio, newspapers, magazines and TV; internet sales
be made illegal when classification occurs; sale and supply be restricted to those over 18years; and penalties to
be provided for as part of classification. Submitter supports further development of regulatory framework as
recommended by EACD.
Submitter favours greater control on packaging and dosage. Submitter favours packaging carrying warnings on
possible side effects and believes this information should be displayed on counters at retail outlets. Submitter
recommends that ID should be required and should be policed in a similar way to alcohol age limits.
Submitter recommends regulating the size of packs that can be purchased; that packages should be well labelled
about risks such as advice not to take with alcohol; that restrictions should be placed on types of outlets that can
sell the pills and the pills should not be able to be sold by dairies or liquor outlets. Submitter recommends that
advertising should be banned on radio, and there should be no public posters or advertisements in shop windows.
Submitter supports alternative regulations and supports (with one amendment) the regulations developed by Chen
and Palmer on behalf of STANZ. The submitter notes that regulation of safety in UK, Australia, Canada, USA and
NZ is based upon the principle that risks must be reduced to a level the is “as low as reasonably practicable”; and
(drawing upon Judge Asquith, Edwards v National Coal Board, All England reports vol1, 1,p,747(1949)) argues
that reasonably practicable is narrower than physically possible implying balancing quantum of risk against the
sacrifice involved in the measures needed for averting the risk (money, time, trouble).
Submitter supports change to the law to reduce potential harm; an increase on the minimum age for legal
purchase; and a ban on advertising BZP products. Submitter also supports restrictions on sale, restricting to head
shops, and not allowing sales in dairies, or alternatively prohibit off-license sales; or supports making it available
for sale where it will be consumed e.g. selling a set dose mixed with liquid and consumed on the premises.
Submitter recommends a total ban on BZP powder with pills to be sold in a standardised dose; excise tax to be
used for harm reduction purposes; a harm reduction campaign; and the prosecution of NZ exporters for selling
BZP overseas to countries where BZP is illegal.
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
94
Submission
number
Position13
55
Opposes
4
Supports
7
Opposes
47
Opposes
23
Opposes
Recommendation 4
Submitter congratulates the Minister for the harm reduction policies followed over the last few years .
Submitter (worker in retail outlet) recommends regulation that allows for age restrictions; limits on maximum
doses per pill and per packet; restricts types of outlets (including perhaps no sale with alcohol); user education;
limits on advertising; and manufacturing controls
COMMUNITY GROUPS
No specific commentary
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Submitter considers that all psychoactive drugs should be required to undergo similar assessment to similar
pharmaceutical agents and should be required to show basic clinical data as to the effects and safety profile.
Recommends tighter controls on manufacture, purchase and variety of piperazines available. These researches
found piperazine content varied greatly between brands with BZP doses ranging from 40mg to 500mg, TFMPP
doses ranging from 5mg to 250 mg. Submitter noted that without controls there is a risk that consumers will
unwittingly take higher doses than expected.
Submitter recommended better enforcement of the age restriction.
Submitter (researcher on alcohol, drugs and addiction treatment and specialist clinical psychologist supporting a
community alcohol drug service) recommends better utilisation of category D. Submitter considers at present the
provisions have not been sufficiently used to mitigate harm because of lax enforcement of age restrictions; no
restriction on the type and number of outlets; and absence of agreed standards for product packaging including
number and dosage of pills per pack and recommended doses. Submitter is concerned that if piperazine-based
pills were to be banned retail outlets would begin to sell other psychoactive substances with a potentially higher
risk profile.
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter is concerned that 16.3% of 15-17 year olds and 3% of 13-14 year olds have tried party pills and urges
that if party pills remain legal that there be strong enforcement of age restrictions and penalties applied for
breaches. Submitter also recommends restricting sale to tablet/capsule form to avoid contamination and any
potential for IV use and notes that good quality control could encourage users away from illegal alternative
substances. Submitter recommends clear/visible labelling identifying content not weight of tablet; retail pack to
contain no more than 4 pills (max 400mgs) BZP; maximum amount of BZP 200mgs per dose and no more than
50gms TFMPP (STANZ recommendation); Health warnings which include (i) advice on Legal High Wallet Card,
(ii) use with alcohol, (iii) sticking to recommended doses, (iv) restricting use to 2 doses per week, (v) not operating
machinery/driving, (vi) pointing out the risks about neurological development of adolescents (vii) waiting for two
hours after initial dose before taking another. Submitter further recommends the development of the regulatory
structure so as to deal with new substances.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
95
Submission
number
27
Position13
Recommendation 4
Opposes
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) recommends that the
government act immediately to introduce a strong regulatory regime as provided for in the MODA. Regulation to
include immediate bans on advertising and marketing of BZP including via the internet; excise tax on all BZP and
related products to fund related heat, enforcement and education costs; and provisions for monitoring the
outcomes and a date for review.
Submitter (umbrella network group of youth workers and organisations) supports on going legal sale under tighter
regulation in the following areas: Quality control on pill contents including limits on types and levels of ingredients
including BZP and phenylpiperazine with associated random testing of pills; Enforced age restrictions; Ban on
sales from places with liquor licenses; Limiting the outlets and quantity of pills sold at any one time; Advertising be
limited to the interior of retail sites; Party pill packets to carry health warnings like cigarettes especially about use
during pregnancy; Warnings about exceeding recommended doses and use with alcohol. The network opposes
reclassification on the basis of harm minimisation.
Submitter (advisory service advocates on minimising harm, provides information and supports people to access
addiction treatment service) recommends that: BZP and related substances remain Class D and not be made
illegal; Party pill industry to be regulated by government not self-regulated; Retail outlets and venues for sale be
licensed; Enforcement of the regulations; Age limit set at 20 yrs; Prohibition on all advertising equivalent to
tobacco; Control of potency; Sale of BZP powder to be banned; The regulatory regime provided in Schedule D to
be immediately implemented for BZP with a further review in 18-24 months; Regulations to be strengthened as
indicated above; An excise tax be applied to all BZP and related products; There be increase in the provisions of
harm minimisation information to offset the misperception the these products are “safe”.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
Submitter supports the development of a regulatory framework and enforcement capacity for Restricted
Substances as the supply of other stimulants is likely to continue. If new drugs, products are shown to pose a lowrisk of harm and are moved to the restricted substances Schedule compliance and enforcement workforce need to
be better able to manage this Schedule of the Act than has been the case with BZP.
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
Submitter attached a Gee and Fountain article of NZMJ 2007 which appears to oppose creating a legal market for
psychoactive drugs, noting that such a decision is profound and could release an unknown number of little
understood psychoactive compounds including those used by indigenous cultures as well as novel designer
drugs.
Submitter is disappointed that controls available under the restricted substances legislation were not fully invoked
45
Opposes
46
Opposes
28
Supports
17
Supports
36
Supports
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
96
Submission
number
Position13
40
Opposes
50
Opposes
11
Split view
9
Opposes
30
44
Opposes
Opposes
52
Opposes
54
Opposes
Recommendation 4
for BZP; there was no enforcement of the only control i.e. not sold or supplied to or by persons less than 18 years.
Submitter would like to see this addressed before other non-therapeutic psychoactive substances reach the
market-place to fill the void if BZP is reclassified.
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Submitter (provider of alcohol and drug treatment services) says they understand the harm resulting from use of
party pills and the way people respond when substances are made illegal and supports retaining party pills as a
restricted substance. Submitter supports new and stricter regulations and enforcement and agrees that improved
regulation will allow for greater control than an outright ban.
Submitter (largest provider of drug treatment, counselling and training services in Auckland area) supports closer
monitoring by a licensing body and regime allowed for under BZP’s current classification. Submitter considers
BZP and related substances ought not to be available in retail outlets like dairies and petrol stations and should
only be available in outlets serving people 18+.
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
A petition organised by the DHB public Health Unit posed two options to petitioners: classification or tighter
regulation. 729 individuals signed the petition of these (34.2%) supported tighter regulatory controls.
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Recommends strict regulation similar to alcohol or tobacco. This to include a ban on advertising, quality control on
product and dosage limit, ban on sale within school zones, limit on outlets able to sell.
Submitter supports tougher regulations covering sale and manufacture.
Submitter support retention of BZP, related substances and TFMPP under Schedule 4.
Submitter endorses age and advertising restrictions and suggests further regulation should be implemented to
cover maximum dose per pill; and maximum pills per pack. Submitter recommends labelling requirements
including ingredient amounts, health warnings, safety information, a retail ban on loose powder form of BZP,
TFMPP and related substances; a more comprehensive restriction on advertising, including sponsorships, at point
of sale and on internet; sale restricted to retail outlets and adult-oriented outlets such as tobacconists, adult stores
and liquor shops and prohibited form sale where alcohol is consumed; STANZ Code of Practise should be made
compulsory; retailers and drug educators should be empowered to provide information on how to use restricted
substances in safer ways; staff training made compulsory like bar managers’ “host responsibility” courses;
Submitter (+ 9186) supports the imposition of regulations on BZP and other piperazines under the MODA Act
2005 to ensure they are manufactured and consumed safely and responsibly.
Submitter supports retaining BZP as restricted for the following reasons: the public use of illicit drugs will be held
at current levels; retains the obligation to provide instruction on use and dose. The submitter recommends that
MDA Act 2005 is designed to cover products of non-therapeutic nature; and notes that if the Act were correctly
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
97
Submission
number
Position13
61 & 61a
Opposes
22
Opposes
34
Opposes
42
Opposes
16
Comment
only
Recommendation 4
developed any incorrect public perceptions of legal status could be addressed and potential future problems
mitigated. The submitter contends that regulation is a better solution but notes that current regulations must be
expanded to mitigate present and future problems.
Submits in support of promulgation and enforcement of further regulations to control manufacture and supply.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
Submitter supports the development of a regulatory framework and enforcement capacity for BZP party pills.
Submitter supports having a restricted list or a Class D list in addition to the main drugs legislation. Submitter
considers the advantages of an enforceable legal structure are that it: Allows for state intervention and control of
production, supply (availability), promotion and use which is not currently available under the minimally regulated
existing market, existing regulatory option or under the unregulated criminal market that classification would
create; Allows for full risk assessment of each drug as the basis for penalties/restrictions; Allows for flexibility
responsive to new research, trends etc; Removes virtually all the risks inherent in criminal markets (Submitter
notes the Dutch cannabis policy is suggested to have kept down levels of use of more dangerous drugs); Harm is
reduced through diversion from more dangerous drugs, and through avoidance of stigma of criminal records.
Submitter (group campaigning for the legalisation of marijuana) recommends taking time to enforce the existing
regulations and to apply greater effort on education and quality control funded form an excise levy on the
substance.
Submitter urges retention of BZP in Schedule 4 because prohibition will not achieve the aim of eliminating the drug
and its use. The drug will be acquired and used and in many cases the market for cannabis and
methamphetamine be stimulated. Submitter considers pills will become more dangerous as strength, composition
and quality will no longer be controlled and suggest that the BZP related death the media and others seem to
yearn for will occur because of prohibition. An illicit substance becoming illicit while stocks are available will be a
windfall for those who choose to sell illicitly. Submitter suggests gangs are probably stockpiling now. Submitter
considers all illicit drugs should be in Schedule 4. Submitter considers the government should not rely on EACD in
formulating policy but should also involve sociological, behavioural, human rights and economic viewpoints.
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter has an overall interest in the drug culture in NZ and the impacts of any new regulatory regime on that
culture and the use of drugs in conjunction with alcohol. They support the need for a systematic regulatory
approach to new substances. They ask that sufficient priority and resources is given so this should proceed. They
note that the new regulatory regime would need to be given clear direction from the Government on the level of
restrictiveness. Submitter considers there are many ways to regulate low risk, non-therapeutic, psychoactive
substances. They consider BZP in the current regulatory setting is close to a free market. This allows for strong
commercial sector interests to normalise the BZP market and leads to an environment in which controls could be
applied as with tobacco and alcohol. Given the submitters experience they would be prepared to offer advice on
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
98
Submission
number
Position13
58
Opposes
60
Supports
39
Opposes
Recommendation 4
the opportunities, risks and impacts of an alternative regulatory regime.
Submitter ( government department of youth policy specialists) undertook a qualitative cost benefit analysis of
three options (i) retaining status quo (ii) increased regulation within current classification(iii) reclassifying BZP to
Class C status. Each of these proposals were assessed against the following criteria: Impact on young people’s
health and wellbeing; Financial cost to government; Ability to implement; and Unintended consequences.
Based on this analysis the submitter concluded that the second option delivered the best outcome. This option
proposes: further limiting: the locations in which BZP products can be sold, point of sale advertising, product
placement (notes this is the option supported by both consumers and manufacturers surveyed in Wilkins et
al).This option also proposes the introduction of excise tax which will increase product cost and thus is likely to
decrease use, while revenue can be used to assist the funding of the increased regulatory regime. New
manufacturing regulations are also proposed including: limiting the number of pills per pack, regulating dose
strengths, child proof caps, and monitoring the accurate labelling and description of contents. The option proposes
further non-regulatory options viz: increasing the levels of public health, prevention and health promotion,
including a more co-ordinated, national approach to BZP health promotion material.
Supports recommendation 4 of EACD, further work on the regulatory framework and enforcement capacity to
strategically deal with future substances introduced.
POLITICAL PARTY
Submitter wants to see the double standard surrounding legal and illegal drugs removed, notes this
recommendation and comments that 1 in 7 of the NDP survey use cannabis and that it is not equitable or socially
sustainable to label half a million ordinary Kiwis as criminal for what is generally innocuous and arguably beneficial
consumption.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
99
3.14 General comments on the review
Submission
number
14
Position14
35
Opposes
55
Opposes
57
Opposes
29
Supports
27
Opposes
General comments
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter considers the submission process is fundamentally flawed because: consumers of BZP were not
invited to submit; the decision is to be made by the Associate Minister with already publicly stated views; the
evidence on which the EACD made its recommendations contain a number of inadequacies and does not
include recent research from Auckland hospital which finds less harm than reported by Dr Gee in CHCH; the
Auckland research has not been made available on the website and is not referred to in the FAQ’s; short time
frame has meant inadequate opportunity to consider available research before the submission deadline; the
public or researchers cannot access the cancelled trial or Dr Gee making it difficult to assess possible researcher
bias; EACD is only required to evaluate harm or potential harm but not benefits; considers if the same process is
used to analyse harm from sex than the logical conclusion would be to criminalise sex. Submitter considers that
Dr Gee’s frequent statements reported in the media suggest bias or are motivated by other reasons such as the
desire to obtain research funding.
Submitter is concerned that the government has been unduly influenced by media reports; asks if the proposed
Trans Tasman Therapeutic Goods Act is influencing and points to potential for conflict of interest in research
because of source of funds.
Submitter considers it is very difficult for a member of the public to make an informed decision as reportage in
the media is sensationalist and that studies sent to the EACD are not available to the public or have not been
completed. Submitter could find only 2 of the 6 studies commissioned by the Ministry.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Submitter considers removing party pills will result in an increase in the price of alternative illegal drugs.
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
No specific commentary
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) The submitter questions
why the EACD discussion could not have been postponed until all research projects have been completed,
reviewed and written up. Comments on gaps in the evidence base and refers to comments made about the
rigour of research undertaken, in particular the MRINZ study. The submitter notes the fact that several studies
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
100
Submission
number
Position14
19
Opposes
20
Supports
44
Opposes
61 & 61a
Opposes
General comments
have not been peer reviewed and two research projects have not been completed.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
Submitter considers the slower (compared with Australia) spread of methamphetamine use in NZ society and
ongoing avoidance of IV drug use is partly due to BZP pills providing an alternative and preventing first contact
with organised crime.
“…prohibition has never worked. It will simply deliver the market to the gangs and to hard drugs like P.” (STANZ
press release 11 Feb 2007). Submitter says prohibition has not worked so well for substances like alcohol and
marijuana and notes that both are extremely simple to synthesize or grow. The submitter considers prohibition
has worked remarkably well for substances such as gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB or Fantasy) which the
submitter considers was ascendant until a user death resulted in stronger regulation. The submitter considers
GHB is now well controlled and the author has seen only one case of GHB intoxication in the past 3 years.
Scheduling of each psychoactive drug should be considered on its merits. Submitter agrees that it is impossible
to eradicate all drug use. However, the submitter points out that the existing policy and health infrastructure
successfully limits use of methamphetamine, heroin and cocaine. Submitter considers unwinnable does not
equate to futile.
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
No specific commentary
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
No specific commentary
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Submitter is concerned that the Minister only invited certain ‘interested parties “to submit but did not invite the
submitter, legal party pill users or members of the public. Given the significant policy issues the submitter asks
for a further round of submissions from the public to Parliament should the Minister accept the recommendation
for reclassification. Submitter is also concerned about the lack of availability of research and information relied
upon by the EACD and points out that this material is unpublished, un-replicated and not peer reviewed.
Submitter is concerned that the Minister through his public comments has demonstrated pre-determination.
Notes that STANZ felt restricted on the time provided, particularly given delays or difficulty accessing some of
the information, and that it has not had access to all the information requested such as copies of submissions by
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
101
Submission
number
Position14
General comments
researchers currently undertaking research into BZP.
The EACD has failed to make all the recommendations required by section 35(2)(b) of the MDAA before the
Minister makes a decision on removal of BZP as a restricted substance. There has not been full consideration of
the unintended effects on medical research and commercial uses.
The EACD does not appear to have considered and provided recommendations on two requirements under
section 35(2)(d) of the MDAA, the practicalities of imposing restrictions or requirements on the substance and
the ability to enforce those restrictions and requirements; and the risk of encouraging persons to use more
dangerous substitutes in place of the substance.
The “affirmative resolution procedure” is not appropriate, intended for banning a new substance similar in
chemical design to an existing banned substance, which is not the case for BZP, and Parliament should give full
consideration to the policy issues and submissions.
Reference is made to Chair of the Regulations Review Committee comment that Amendments to the Schedule
concerning restricted substances should be made by primary legislation, not by Order in Council
Refers to Hansard, some MPs concern about restricting BZP in a rushed manner without considering all the
policy issues, and about the inclusion of the affirmative resolution procedure.
Suggests BZP is the first and only substance regulated as a restricted substance under the MDAA (current
status) so the proposed reclassification is unprecedented. The Order in Council must be made pursuant to both
the MDA and the MDAA, and the affirmative resolution procedure, while being used to classify drugs under the
MDA has not previously been used to reclassify a substance restricted under the MDAA.
Concerns with the consultation, and that the Minister will be using unpublished studies, that the submitters have
not had access to, to aid the decision-making.
Refers to MED advice, submits that MED should undertake a full economic regulatory impact assessment prior
to any decision.
42
Opposes
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
Submitter is concerned that the EACD recommendation is based too narrowly in its examination of issues and
should take into account sociological, behavioural, human rights and economic issues.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
102
Submission
number
Position14
16
Comment
only
General comments
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter is concerned that EACD in making its recommendation has not properly examined the option of tight
restrictions rather than prohibition. They note EACD concluded that restricting supply would require the
establishment of significant administrative and enforcement capacity as for pharmaceuticals, tobacco and
alcohol. The submitter queries the need for such a large enforcement capacity, particularly if restrictions were
tight and outlets supplying BZP kept to a minimum. The submitter also asks if there has been adequate
comparison of the impact on enforcement capacity, and the justice system of the regulatory system compared
with the classification regime. They consider official advice should have contained a full analysis of the
alternative regime.
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
103
3.15 Other recommendations
Submission
number
15
Position15
37
Opposes
27
Opposes
28
Supports
Other submitter recommendations
INDIVIDUALS
Submitter supports a total ban on the sale of BZP as a powder as it is difficult to measure a suitable dose from a
1gm bag of powder.
COMMUNITY GROUPS
No specific commentary
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
No specific commentary
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Submitter (foundation that looks to evidence-based practice and harm minimisation) recommends delaying
decision until all research projects EACD has relied upon in its decision are competed, reviewed and written up;
continuing research on the effects on long-term users, including risks of developing some level of dependency,
difficulties in stopping use of and effective cessation and support treatment; and provision of support and
treatment services irrespective of the decision on classification.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
Submitter stresses the need for ensuring dependent users have access to appropriate drug treatment services
when BZP is reclassified. They consider it unethical to alter the supply control status without also providing
services to addicts so they can stop using and avoid gaining a criminal conviction. Submitter also recommends
that agencies deemed responsible for enforcement of reclassification are given adequate time and resources in
preparation for the change; and that a significant public information campaign identifying the reclassification is
released.
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (writing in private capacity)
No specific commentary
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
No specific commentary
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
No specific commentary
Indicates position on whether BZP and related substances should be classified as Class C1.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
104
Submission
number
Position15
Other submitter recommendations
DBH / EMERGENCY SERVICE
No specific commentary
9
Opposes
44
Opposes
42
Opposes
32
Supports
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
Recommends for NZ to take advantage of current situation and become a world leader in a move away from
prohibition to a sensible drug policy based around regulation.
Submitter notes the government has allowed a legitimate industry to develop in the sale, manufacture and
distribution of legal party pills over a seven year period and considers that a decision to ban legal party pills now
would be a substantial confiscation of property rights.
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
Recommends changing the make up of the EACD to include lay people.
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Submitter notes that because party pills can contain more than one piperazine this may complicate the
classification. They suggest creating a heading under 2933 covering all known analogues and derivatives of BZP
and phenylpiperazine rather than splitting the classification into forms and then into the type of piperazine e.g.
Analogues and derivatives of BZP and phenylpiperazine:
1. Powder form (BZP, TFMPP, PFPP…, other
2. Pill form ( sole active ingredient BZP, sole active ingredient TFMPP, containing more than 1 analogue
or derivative of BZP of phenylpiperazine, other)
3. Other
POLITICAL PARTY
No specific commentary
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
105
Appendix A: Submissions received (by number)
Note: submitters are categorised according to the identified affiliation in their submission. This is despite the fact that in some cases
they might otherwise fall under one or more other categories.
Submission
number
1
2*
3
4
5
6
7
Organisation
Received from
Category
Personal submission
Personal submission
Gerry Macridis
Timothy Fleming
MD,FACC (via J. Dean
MP)
Bob Todd
Richard Beasley
Nicki Mora
Janine Lemmens
Dr Bruce Russell, Michelle
Gordon
Dr Marc Wilson, Kate
Bryson
Dr Marc Wilson, Kate
Bryson
Nicholas William Cairns
Dr Tony Smith
Chris Clarke (writer Sandy
Keen)
Ross Boswell
Barbara Derecourt
Murray Burns
Bruce Robertson
Gerard Vaughan
Graham Sharpe
Private individual
Health Professional
9
10
11
Hagley Ferrymead Community Board
Medical Research Institute of NZ
Personal submission
Personal submission
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of
Pharmacy, University of Auckland
School of Psychology, Victoria University of
Wellington
School of Psychology, Victoria University of
Wellington
Personal submission
St John
Hawkes Bay District Health Board
12
13
14
15
16
17
NZ Medical Association
Personal submission
Pharmacy Guild of NZ
Hospitality Association of NZ
Alcohol Advisory Council of NZ
NZ Society of Anaesthetists
8
8a (41)
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
Private individuals
Researcher/University
Private individual (youth worker)
Private individual (parent)
Researcher/University
Researcher/University
Researcher/University
Retailer
DHB/Hospital/Emergency Service
DHB/Hospital/Emergency Service
Health Professional organisation
Private individual
Health Professional organisation
Drug policy interest organisation
Drug policy interest organisation
Health Professional organisation
106
Submission
number
18
19
20(38)
21
22*
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33*
34
35
36
37
38 (20)
39
40
41
42
43
Organisation
Received from
Category
Specialist Mental Health Service
Personal submission
Personal submission
Dr Peter Miller
Dr Paul Quigley
Dr Paul Gee
submission
Health professional
Health professional
DHB/Hospital/Emergency Service
NZ Customs Service
Transform Drug Policy Foundation (UK)
Health Action Trust
Student Association Nelson Marlborough Institute of
Technology
Personal submission
Personal submission
NZ Drug Foundation – Te Tuapapa Tarukino o
Aotearoa
Regional Public Health – Greater Wellington
Drug Arm (Blenheim)
Cosmic Corner
Tasman Youth Council
NZ Police
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP)
National Organisation for the Reform of Marijuana
Laws (NORML NZ Inc)
Personal submission
Pharmaceutical Society of NZ (inc)
Personal submission
Personal submission
Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party
Community Alcohol and Drug Services (Auck)
Vacant submission number
Christchurch Drug Policy Group
Personal submission
(further
No name
Karen Howieson
No name
Enforcement Agency
Drug policy interest group
Health advocacy or interest/service group
Private individuals
Louise Gould
Jessica Neve
Ross Bell
Private individual (student nurse)
Private individual (youth)
Health advocacy interest/service group
David Towl
Roy Ramsey
Mark Carswell
Cindus Colonna
Angela Gallagher
Jack A Cole
Will de Cleene
DHB/Hospital /Emergency Service
Private individual
Retailer / manufacturer
Youth/student group/govt dept
Enforcement Agency
Drug policy interest group/organisation
Drug policy interest group/organisation
Stephen Luke
Euan Galloway
Ron Law
Dr Paul Gee
Kevin O’Connell
Diana Rands
Researcher/University
Health Professional organisation
Private individual
DHB/Hospital/Emergency Service
Drug policy interest group/organisation
Health advocacy or interest/service group
Brandon Hutchison
Steven S (anon)
Drug policy interest group/organisation
Private individual
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
107
Submission
number
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51*
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
61a
62
Organisation
Received from
Category
The Hempstore Aotearoa Tapui (Ltd)
NZ Association for Adolescent Health and
Development
Alcohol Drug Association New Zealand
National Addiction Centre
Personal submission
Community Alcohol and Drug Service, Chch
Community Alcohol and Drug Service, Auck
Health Officers’ Council of British Columbia
Energy Products Ltd
Energy Product Ltd
Cosmic
Personal submission
Personal submission
Personal submission
Ministry of Youth Development
Personal submission
Child Youth & Family
Social Tonics Association of New Zealand
Social Tonics Association of New Zealand
Personal submission
Chris Fowlie
Matt Roberts
Retailer
Health advocacy or interest/service group
No name
Dr Simon Adamson
Lorraine Mullings
Elle King
Sheridan Pooley
Dr James Lu
Andy Smith + 9,186
Andy Smith + 279
M Muir
Sarah Williams
Richard Goode
Paul Litterick
David Rea
Jill Summer
Ray Smith
Matt Bowden
Matt Bowden
Sharon Mason
Health advocacy or interest/service group
Researcher/University
Private individual (youth worker)
Health advocacy or interest/service group
Health advocacy or interest/service group
Health Professional organisation
Retailer (Plus petition of individuals)
Retailer (Plus petition of retail outlets)
Retailer / Manufacturer
Private Individual (retail shop assistant)
Private Individual
Private Individual
Youth/student group/govt dept
Private Individual (social worker)
Government / State agency
Retailer / Industry group
Retailer / Industry group
Private Individual
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
108
Appendix B: Submissions received (by category)
Submission
number
1
5
6
13
24
25
26
35
37
43
48
55
56
57
59
62
3
29
31
4
7
Organisation
Received from
Category
INDIVIDUALS
Personal submission
Gerry Macridis
Private individual
Personal submission
Nicki Mora
Private individual (youth worker)
Personal submission
Janine Lemmens
Private individual (parent)
Personal submission
Barbara Derecourt
Private individual
Student Association Nelson Marlborough Institute No name
Private individuals (students)
of Technology
Personal submission
Louise Gould
Private individual (student nurse)
Personal submission
Jessica Neve
Private individual (youth/user)
Personal submission
Stephen Luke
Private individual (PhD researcher)
Personal submission
Ron Law
Private individual
Personal submission
Steven S (anon)
Private individual
Personal submission
Lorraine Mullings
Private individual (youth worker)
Personal submission
Sarah Williams
Private individual (retail shop assistant)
Personal submission
Richard Goode
Private individual
Personal submission
Paul Litterick
Private individual
Personal submission
Jill Summer
Private Individual (social worker)
Personal submission
Sharon Mason
Private Individual
COMMUNITY GROUPS
Hagley Ferrymead Community Board
Bob Todd
Community organisation
Drug Arm (Blenheim)
Roy Ramsey
Community organisation
Tasman Youth Council
Cindus Colonna
Community organisation
RESEARCHER / RESEARCH ORGANISATION / UNIVERSITY
Medical Research Institute of NZ
Richard Beasley
Researcher / Research organisation /
University
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Dr
Bruce
Russell, Researcher / Research organisation /
Pharmacy, University of Auckland
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
109
Submission
number
8
8a
47
23
27
45
46
28
2*
19
20
38
12
14
17
36
51*
Organisation
Received from
Category
School of Psychology, Victoria University of
Wellington
School of Psychology, Victoria University of
Wellington
National Addiction Centre
Michelle Gordon
Dr Marc Wilson, Kate
Bryson
Dr Marc Wilson, Kate
Bryson
Dr Simon Adamson
University
Researcher / Research organisation /
University
Researcher / Research organisation /
University
Researcher / Research organisation /
University
HEALTH ADVOCACY / INTEREST GROUP
Health Action Trust
Karen Howieson
NZ Drug Foundation – Te Tuapapa Tarukino o
Ross Bell
Aotearoa
New Zealand Association for Adolescent Health
Matt Roberts
and Development
Alcohol Drug Association New Zealand
No name
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
Regional Public Health – Greater Wellington
David Towl
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ( writing in private capacity)
Personal submission
Timothy Fleming
MD,FACC (via J. Dean
MP)
Personal submission
Dr Paul Quigley
Personal submission
Dr Paul Gee
Personal submission
Dr Paul Gee, Sandra
Richardson, Grant Moore
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL BODIES / ORGANISATIONS
New Zealand Medical Association
Ross Boswell
Pharmacy Guild of New Zealand
Murray Burns
New Zealand Society of Anaesthetists
Graham Sharpe
Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand
Euan Galloway
Health Officers’ Council of British Columbia
Dr James Lu
ALCOHOL / DRUG TREATMENT PROVIDER
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
Health advocacy or interest group
Health advocacy or interest group
Health advocacy or interest group
Health advocacy or interest group
Public Health Service
Health professional
Health professional
Health professional
Health professionals
Health Professional Body / Organisation
Health Professional Body / Organisation
Health Professional Body / Organisation
Health Professional Body / Organisation
Health Professional Body / Organisation
110
Submission
number
18
40
49
50
10
11
9
15
30
44
52
53
54
61
61a
22*
33*
34
Organisation
Received from
Category
Specialist Mental Health Service
Community Alcohol and Drug Services (Auck)
Community Alcohol and Drug Service,
Christchurch
Community Alcohol and Drug Service, Auckland
Dr Peter Miller
Diana Rands
Elle King
Alcohol or drug treatment provider
Alcohol or drug treatment provider
Alcohol or drug treatment provider
Sheridan Pooley
Alcohol or drug treatment provider
DHB / EMERGENCY SERVICE
Dr Tony Smith
Chris
Clarke
(writer
Sandy Keen)
RETAILER / INDUSTRY GROUP
None provided
Nicholas William Cairns
Hospitality Association of New Zealand
Bruce Robertson
Cosmic Corner
Mark Carswell
The Hempstore Aotearoa Tapui (Ltd)
Chris Fowlie
Energy Products Ltd
Andy Smith + 9,186
individuals (a further 746
signatures posted to the
“Save the Pills” website
arrived after the close off
date for submissions)
Energy Product Ltd
Andy Smith + 279 retail
outlets and sellers
Cosmic
M Muir
Social Tonics Association of New Zealand
Matt Bowden
Social Tonics Association of New Zealand
Matt Bowden
DRUG POLICY / LAW REFORM ORGANISATION
Transform Drug Policy Foundation (UK)
No name
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP)
Jack A Cole
National Organisation for the Reform of Marijuana Will de Cleene
Laws (NORML NZ Inc)
St John
Hawkes Bay District Health Board
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
DHB / Emergency service
DHB / Emergency service
Retailer / Industry group
Retailer / Industry group
Retailer / Industry group
Retailer / Industry group
Retailer / Industry group
Retailer / industry group
Retailer / Manufacturer
Retailer / Industry group
Retailer / Industry group
Drug policy / law reform organisation
Drug policy / law reform organisations
Drug policy / law reform organisations
111
Submission
number
42
16
21
32
58
60
39
Organisation
Received from
Christchurch Drug Policy Group
Brandon Hutchison
GOVERNMENT / STATE AGENCY
Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand
Gerard Vaughan
NZ Customs Service
Ginny Legge
NZ Police
Angela Gallagher
Ministry of Youth Development
David Rea
Child Youth & Family
Ray Smith
POLITICAL PARTY
Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party
Kevin O’Connell
Category
Drug policy / law reform organisations
Government / State agency
Government / State agency
Government / State agency
Government / State agency
Government / State agency
Political party
* Those submission numbers marked with an asterisk have an international connection: they are either based offshore, or live or work at least part of
their time overseas.
Allen & Clarke. Report to the Ministry of Health: Proposal to classify BZP and related chemicals as Class C drugs under MODA . April 2007
112