Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
University of Groningen Structures of photosynthetic membrane complexes Semchonok, Dmytro IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2016 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Semchonok, D. A. (2016). Structures of photosynthetic membrane complexes [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 17-06-2017 SUMMARY Some concepts of photosynthesis in a nutshell Photosynthesis is essential to all life on Earth and all organisms depend on it in a direct or indirect way. It is the biological process that can capture energy that originates in outer space (sunlight) and convert it into chemical compounds (carbohydrates) that every organism uses to power its metabolism (OpenStax CNX - Biology). This conversion takes many steps, catalyzed by a series of special proteins. Therefore, photosynthesis is divided in two stages: the light-dependent reactions and the lightindependent (“dark”) reactions. During the light-dependent reactions, energy from sunlight is absorbed by pigments and converted into chemical energy stored in the form of NADPH and ATP. The first steps in this process are accomplished by protein complexes on which multiple chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment molecules are bound. The next steps provide the conversion of the energy into NADPH and ATP. During the light-independent reactions, the stored energy drives the assembly of sugar molecules from carbon dioxide. Therefore, although the light-independent reactions do not use light as a reactant, they require the products of the lightdependent reactions to function. In addition, several enzymes of the lightindependent reactions are activated by light (OpenStax CNX - Biology) . Light energy is converted into chemical energy in multiprotein complexed called photosystems. Two types of photosystems, photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII), are found in a special photosynthetic membrane, called the thylakoid membrane. The heart of the photosystems is the reaction center. Photosystems function in oxygenic photosynthesis, and exist in all green plants and some lower organisms such as cyanobacteria. For some prokaryotes the complex responsible for light conversion is less complex and is named a reaction center. Both photosystems and reaction centers need some additional antenna complexes for light absorption and transfer. These functions are executed by membrane-bound light harvesting protein complexes and water-soluble antenna complexes. There is a substantial variation in composition and size between groups of organisms. Another important point is the association of photosystems and reaction centers into higher complexes. Unlike the monomeric reaction centers in green and purple bacteria, PSI forms trimeric complexes in most cyanobacteria with a 3-fold rotational symmetry. More recently, in some species a tetrameric PSI complex was observed. However, 192 in plants/algae, PSI is monomeric. In contrast, PSII in cyanobacteria and plants is monomeric or dimeric, but never forms trimers or tetramers. In chapter 2, we are discussing the attachment of phycobilisomes in an antenna-photosystem I supercomplex of cyanobacteria. The phycobilisome (PBS) is an interesting example of a large water-soluble antenna, only found in algae and cyanobacteria and absent in higher plants. Both photosystem I and photosystem II in cyanobacteria have a specific internal antenna complex, but the PBS is the major peripheral antenna protein complex in cyanobacteria, typically consisting of a core from which several rod-like subcomplexes protrude. PBSs preferentially transfer light energy to PSII, whereas a PSI-specific antenna has not been identified. The cores and the rods of a PBS are hold together by several linker proteins. The cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 has rod-core linker genes (cpcG1cpcG2-cpcG3-cpcG4). Their products, except CpcG3, have been detected in the conventional PBS. Here we report the isolation of a supercomplex that comprises a PSI tetramer and a second, unique type of a PBS, specific to PSI. This rod-shaped PBS includes phycocyanin protein copies and CpcG3 (hereafter renamed "CpcL"), but no allophycocyanin copies or CpcGs. Fluorescence excitation showed efficient energy transfer from PBS to PSI. The supercomplex was analyzed by electron microscopy and single-particle averaging. In the supercomplex, one to three rod-shaped CpcL-PBSs associate to a tetrameric PSI complex. They are mostly composed of two hexameric plastocyanin units and bind at the periphery of PSI, at the interfaces of two monomers. Structural modeling indicates, based on twodimensional projection maps, how the PsaI, PsaL, and PsaM subunits link PSI monomers into dimers and into a rhombically shaped tetramer or "pseudotetramer." The 3D model further shows where PBSs associate with the large subunits PsaA and PsaB of PSI. It is proposed that the alternative form of CpcL-PBS is functional in harvesting energy in a wide number of cyanobacteria, partially to facilitate the involvement of PSI in nitrogen fixation. In chapter 3, we studied another organism, the unicellular cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis sp. TS-821 (TS-821), that also contains a tetrameric PSI complex. In TS-821, PSI forms tetrameric and dimeric species that were investigated by Blue Native PAGE, sucrose density gradient centrifugation, 77K fluorescence, circular dichroism, and single-particle analysis. Transmission electron microscopy analysis of native membranes confirms 193 the presence of the tetrameric PSI structure prior to detergent solubilization. Single particle analysis shows that the tetramers are similar to those of Anabaena, studied in chapter 2. They are again pseudo-tetramers, but appear less elongated than those of Anabaena. It is an open question why tetramers are formed instead of trimers. Another question is how they are made, because the trimers and tetramers have the same set of small subunits involved in association of momomers into multimers. To investigate why TS-821 forms tetramers instead of trimers, the PsaL gene known to be responsible for trimer formation was cloned and analyzed. Interestingly, this gene product contains a short insert between the second and third predicted transmembrane helices. Phylogenetic analysis based on PsaL protein sequences shows that TS-821 is closely related to heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria, some of which also have a tetrameric form of PSI. These results are discussed in light of chloroplast evolution, and was propose that PSI evolved stepwise from a trimeric form to tetrameric oligomer en route to becoming monomeric in plants/algae. In chapter 4, we are continuing our investigation of the tetrameric form of PSI from the unicellular cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis sp. TS-821 using the cry-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) technique. The aim is to study the tetramerization ability of TS-821 in more detail. The investigation was focused on dimer-dimer intermonomer space where some PSI subunits of each monomer are creating the contact side with the neighboring monomer. The obtained cryo-EM volume density map at 11.5 Å resolution provides a general idea about orientation of PSI units inside TS-821. Two different interfaces created by monomer-monomer interactions were found due to different contacts of PSI subunits. The crystal structure PSI from Thermosynechococcus elongatus was fitted in in order to see the contacts between PSI monomers in the intermonomer space in more detail. The PsaL subunit of PSI known to participate in the trimerization of PSI in Thermosynechococcus was modified according to amino acid sequence of TS-821. The crystal structure of PSI from T. elongatus with modified PsaL subunit shows better fitting inside obtained 3D volume density map. It is also concluded that besides PsaL subunit, PsaI, PsaM, PsaA, PsaB subunits are also involved into the PSI tetramer formation. In chapter 5, we discuss the organization of a photosynthetic complex in a bacterium. The principle of a reaction center surrounded by a peripheral antenna is the same as in green plants and cyanobacteria, but in non194 oxygenic bacteria the reaction center and antenna complexes are substantially smaller. The reaction center (RC) surrounded by light harvesting antenna complexes (RC-LH1) of purple bacteria can be either monomeric or dimeric, depending on the presence of a small protein named PufX. Electron microscopy and single-particle averaging were performed on isolated RC-LH1-PufX complexes of Rhodobaca bogoriensis strain LBB1, with the aim of establishing the LH1 antenna conformation, and, in particular, the structural role of the PufX protein in the dimerization of RCLH1 complexes. Projection maps of dimeric complexes were obtained at 13 Å resolution and show the positions of the 2 × 14 LH1 units, each composed of an α- and β-subunit. This new dimeric complex displays two open, Cshaped LH1 aggregates of 13 αβ polypeptides partially surrounding the RCs plus two LH1 units forming the dimer interface in the center. Between the interface and the two half rings are two openings on each side. Next to the openings, there are four additional densities present per dimer, considered to be occupied by four copies of PufX. The position of the RC in our model was verified by comparison with RC-LH1-PufX complexes in membranes. Our model differs from previously proposed configurations for Rhodobacter species in which the LH1 ribbon is continuous in the shape of an S, and the stoichiometry is of one PufX per RC. One of the important regulatory processes that can occur in plant photosynthesis is state transition. State transition is a mechanism of redistribution of the energy between photosystem I and II. In this process the main players are photosystem I and II and trimeric light-harvesting complex II (LHCII). LHCII can bind to both PSI and PSII and by redistribution of LHCII between PSI and PSII the relative excitation of both photosystems is balanced and optimized. Some aspects of this process are discussed in chapter 6. State transitions are driven by reversible LHCII phosphorylation by the STN7 kinase and PPH1/TAP38 phosphatase. The LHCII trimers are, however, heterotrimers making the situation more complex. LHCII trimers are composed of Lhcb1, Lhcb2, and Lhcb3 proteins in various trimeric configurations. Here, we show that despite their nearly identical amino acid composition, the functional roles of Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 are different but complementary. Arabidopsis thaliana plants lacking only Lhcb2 contain thylakoid protein complexes similar to wild-type plants, where Lhcb2 has been replaced by Lhcb1. However, these do not perform state transitions, so 195 phosphorylation of Lhcb2 seems to be a critical step. In contrast, plants lacking Lhcb1 had a more profound antenna remodeling due to a decrease in the amount of LHCII trimers influencing thylakoid membrane structure and, more indirectly, state transitions. Although state transitions are also found in green algae, the detailed architecture of the extant seed plant lightharvesting antenna can now be dated back to a time after the divergence of the bryophyte and spermatophyte lineages, but before the split of the angiosperm and gymnosperm lineages more than 300 million years ago. 196