Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
P1723 PHARMACOKINETICS OF 7-DAY MULTIPLE-DOSE TEDIZOLID PHOSPHATE IN HEALTHY JAPANESE SUBJECTS IN A PHASE I PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY Toshiaki Tanaka1, Yuko Hayashi1, Kazuhito Okumura1, Kenichi Yoshikawa1, Masaharu Kato2, Kumiko T Kanatani3, Ippei Ikushima4 Clinical Pharmacology Asia/Japan, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Osaka, Japan; 2Clinical Statistics, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Osaka, Japan; 3Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan; 4LTA Clinical Pharmacology Centre Sumida Hospital, Tokyo, Japan INTRODUCTION Gram-positive infections caused by drug-resistant pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remain a challenge for physicians as outcome may be associated with increased mortality.1 There is a high unmet medical need in the management of such infections because the existing effective antibiotics often need monitoring of their therapeutic level and require dose adjustment in special populations (e.g. elderly, renal impairment) or are contraindicated due to comorbidities. According to a survey conducted in Japan in 2010 by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), the prevalence of the Gram-positive MRSA leading to nosocomial infections was much higher (90%) compared with other drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens such as penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.2 The currently approved and marketed drugs to treat MRSA infections in Japan are vancomycin, teicoplanin, arbekacin, daptomycin, and linezolid. Tedizolid phosphate (TZDP) is a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic prodrug for infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA. TZDP is rapidly converted into tedizolid (TZD), its active moiety, by non-specific phosphatases in vivo.3 Two recently completed Phase III clinical studies have demonstrated non-inferior efficacy of tedizolid 200 mg once-daily treatment for 6 days to linezolid 600 mg twice-daily treatment for 10 days in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs).4,5,6 The objective of this Phase I study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tedizolid in Japanese subjects after 7-day administration of TZDP. The safety results of this Phase I study have been reported previously.7 METHODS This was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised Phase I study. Healthy male subjects received TZDP or placebo for 7 days once daily between Day 0 and Day 6. In cohort 1, subjects received intravenous TZDP 200 mg (IV, n=8) or saline infusion (n=4). In cohort 2, subjects received oral (PO) TZDP 200 mg tablets (n=8) or placebo tablets (n=4). Drug and/or alcohol abuse or suspicion of drug and/or alcohol abuse Intake of alcohol-, grapefruit-, caffeine-, or high tyramine-containing foods or beverages within 4 days before the first drug administration Smokers or former smokers (cessation <3 months before the start of the study) Clinically relevant ECG findings Systolic blood pressure (BP) <90 or >140 mmHg or diastolic BP <45 or >90 mmHg Heart rate <45 or >95 beats/min Clinically relevant deviations from the normal range in the clinical laboratory test in the investigator‘s opinion Key inclusion criteria Japanese healthy male subjects aged 20 to 40 years Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 17.6 and ≤ 26.4 kg/m² Subjects provided signed informed consent before the study start. Key exclusion criteria Known hypersensitivity, intolerance, or allergy to oxazolidinone antibiotics History of severe allergies, opportunistic infection or infections of unexplained frequency or severity Signs of infection or symptoms of constipation Febrile illness within 1 week before the first study drug administration RZ_BHC_ECCMID_PK-MD_Sivextro_Medical-Poster_140428.indd 1 Baseline demographics of subjects and compliance to study drug A total of 24 subjects were randomised. There were no clinically relevant differences in demographic parameters. 33.3% of subjects had previous history of smoking, and 41.7% of the subjects had light alcohol intake. All subjects completed the 7-day TZDP administration and had a cumulative dose of 1400 mg TZDP. No subject who received TZDP discontinued the study. In the placebo group one subject discontinued administration of placebo due to an adverse event (atrial fibrillation). Pharmacokinetics Deviations from the lower limit of normal range in white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC) or platelets. Pharmacokinetic assessments Intravenous TZDP dissolved in 250 mL sterile saline was infused over 60 minutes. Subjects in the placebo group received intravenous saline over 60 minutes. Oral TZDP and placebo tablets were given with 240 mL water. Use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1) receptor agonists (triptans), monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, buspirone, meperidine and other serotonergic medications within 5 weeks before the first study drug administration Study design and treatments Prolonged (> 2 weeks) exposure to linezolid within 1 year before the first drug administration Plasma samples in both cohorts were collected at baseline (Day 0) prior to administration of TZDP and at subsequent timepoints up to 72 hours during and after administration of the last dose of study drug on Day 6. Blood samples were collected on Day 0 with respect to start of infusion at: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 65 min, 70 min, 75 min, 90 min, 120 min, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24h (=Day 1), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, and on Day 6 with respect to start of infusion at: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 65 min, 70 min, 75 min, 90 min, 120 min, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h (=Day 7), Day 8, Day 9. Blood samples were collected on Day 0 with respect to administration of oral tablet at: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24h (=Day 1), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, and on Day 6 with respect to administration of oral tablet at: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h (=Day 7), Day 8, Day 9. TZDP and TZD concentrations were determined in human plasma and urine samples using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS/MS). The calibration range of the procedure was 5.00 μg/L (lower limit of quantification [LLOQ]) to 1000 μg/L (upper limit of quantification [ULOQ]) for both substances. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters including area under the concentration curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), half-life (t1/2) and time to reach Cmax (tmax) were calculated and expressed as geometric mean (% coefficient of variance). PK parameters were compared between Day 0 and Day 6. Drug accumulation ratio (RA) was calculated as AUC0-24md / AUC0-24 and linearity factor (RLin) of pharmacokinetics was calculated after repeated administration of identical doses as AUC0-24md / AUC. After IV administration of TZDP, the plasma concentration of TZD on Day 0 reached a Cmax of 3.54 (9.16) μg/mL approximately at the end of the 1 hour infusion (tmax=1.03 hours; range: 0.983−1.17 hours). The AUC0-∞ was 33.8 (19.5) μg•h/mL and AUC0-24h was 28.1 (15.9) μg•h/mL. After PO administration of TZDP, TZD plasma concentration on Day 0 reached a Cmax of 2.08 (24.6) μg/mL within ≈3 hours (range: 1.50− 4.00 hours). The AUC0-∞ was 24.9 (24.4) μg•h/mL and AUC0-24h was 20.7 (21.6) μg•h/mL. CONCLUSIONS The plasma concentration of TZDP after IV administration declined rapidly to below LLOQ (5 µg/L) within 3 hours after end of the 60-min infusion on Day 0 (t1/2=0.252 hours) and Day 6 (t1/2=0.648 hours) (Figure 2). TZDP was not detected after PO administration in plasma and in urine. Figure 1. Plasma concentration of TZD after multiple doses of IV or PO TZDP in healthy Japanese subjects. Plasma tedizolid concentrations were quantifiable in all subjects at 15 minutes after start of IV infusion (Figure 1). After PO administration of TZDP, plasma tedizolid concentrations were quantifiable in all subjects at 30 minutes (Figure 1). On Day 6 accumulation of TZD was minimal with RA values of 1.22 (5.53) for IV and 1.28 (6.31) for PO routes, and it was predicted by the single dose kinetics RLin values of 1.02 (5.05) for IV and 1.06 (5.90) for PO routes. Urinary excretion of TZD was negligible (IV: 1.2% and PO: 0.8%, arithmetic mean) in a 24-hour period. On Day 0 after IV administration of TZDP, TZDP plasma concentration reached a Cmax of 2.68 (11.6) μg/mL within ≈ 30 minutes (tmax=0.50 hours; range: 0.250−0.983 hours). The AUC0-∞ was 2.35 (14.6) μg•h/mL and AUC0-24h was 2.36 (14.6) μg•h/mL. On Day 6 after IV administration of TZDP, TZDP plasma concentration reached a Cmax of 2.52 (14.0) μg/mL within ≈ 30 minutes (tmax=0.50 hours; range: 0.250−0.500 hours). The AUC0-24h was 2.21 (15.2) μg•h/mL. TZD plasma concentration reached steady state on Day 1 of TZDP 200 mg once-daily administration, regardless of the route of administration. Pharmacokinetics of TZD showed minimal accumulation following 7-day repeated-dose TZDP administration. The PK profile of TZD after administration of multiple doses of TZDP 200 mg once-daily administration for 7 days, and considering high antibacterial activity against MRSA (MIC90: 0.25 µg/ml) seems appropriate for the treatment of Gram-positive infections and allows the clinical development of tedizolid for ABSSSI and nosocomial pneumonia in Japan. REFERENCES 1. Sandiumenge A, Rello J. Ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by ESKAPE organisms: cause, clinical features, and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012 May;18(3):187−93. 1000 100 2. JANIS survey; Available at: http://www.nih-janis.jp/. Accessed: 08. November 2013. 3. Locke JB et al, Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58(Suppl 1): S35−S42. 10 4. Prokocimer P et al, Tedizolid phosphate vs linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the ESTABLISH-1 randomized trial. JAMA 2013; 309: 559−569. 1 PK data on Day 6 were comparable to those on Day 0 in both cohorts (IV: Cmax=3.82 (15.2) μg/mL; AUC0-24 = 34.4 (19.2) μg•h/mL; PO: Cmax=2.51 (18.1) μg/mL; AUC0-24 = 26.4 (22.4) μg•h/mL). On Day 6 the t1/2 of TZD was 11.9 hours (geometric means) and 11.2 hours (geometric means) after IV and PO administration of TZDP, respectively. Additionally, tmax was 1.08 hours (range: 0.983−1.25 hours) and 4.00 hours (range: 2.00−6.00 hours) after IV and PO administration of TZDP, respectively. Changes in the plasma concentration of TZD after IV or PO administration of TZDP over time (between Day 0 and Day 6) is shown in Figure 1. During multiple-dose administration of TZDP 200 mg once daily over 7 days, plasma tedizolid concentration reached steady state on Day 1, regardless of administration route. 10000 Tedizolid plasma concentration (µg/L) RESULTS 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 5. Fang E et al, 23rd European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 27−30 April 2013, Berlin, Germany. Abstract LB-1964. 216 Time (h) IV: intravenous, PO: oral Tedizolid IV (n=8) 6. De Anda C et al, 53rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 10−13 September 2013, Denver, USA, Abstract L-203. Tedizolid PO (n=8) 7. Tanaka T et al, 18th Asian Pacific Society of Respirology (APSR) meeting, 11−14 November 2013, Yokohama, Japan, PS095. Figure 2. Plasma concentration of TZDP after IV administration on Day 0 and Day 6 in healthy Japanese subjects. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This analysis was sponsored by Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Japan. 10000 TZDP plasma concentration (µg/L) 1 This poster was presented at the 24th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases in Barcelona, Spain, 10–13 May 2014. 1000 100 10 LLOQ: 5 µg/L 1 Day 0: Day 6: 0 144 1 145 2 146 3 147 4 148 5 149 6 150 Time of sample collection (h) Infusion of TZDP Day 0 (n=8) Day 6 (n=8) 29.04.14 09:30