* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Introductory Lectures on Work and Energy Day 1: We begin by
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup
Gibbs free energy wikipedia , lookup
Hunting oscillation wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Internal energy wikipedia , lookup
Kinetic energy wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Introductory Lectures on Work and Energy Day 1: We begin by introducing work: W = FdcosƟ, where F = force, d = displacement (how far object travels under influence of force), and Ɵ is the angle between the directions of F and d. Note that if Ɵ is zero (meaning the force is parallel to the motion), then cosƟ = 1, and the equation reduces to the more familiar W = Fd (work = force x distance). Also note that if Ɵ = 90° (force perpendicular to motion, as in the case of circular motion), then cosƟ = 0 and hence work is zero (no work is done by a force perpendicular to motion). The units of work are Joules: following the equation, Newtons x meters = Joules. (7 minutes) Consider an object, initially traveling at velocity v0, being pushed horizontally by a constant force F on a level frictionless surface. Here Ɵ= 0 (thus W = Fd), and since there is no friction, the force F is the net force (Fnet) on the object. We can then use two previously-learned equations: Fnet = ma where m = mass and a = acceleration (Newton’s Second Law); and v 2= v02 + 2ad (one of the kinematic equations which describes constant acceleration motion). Combining the equations together, we find: W = Fd = mad = m(v2 – v02)/2 (equation 1) We now define kinetic energy: KE = mv2/2 For this example the quantity mv02/2 would then refer to the initial kinetic energy, KE0. Equation 1 then becomes W = KE – KE0 = Δ(KE) (work equals change in kinetic energy). This is known as the “work-energy theorem”, and is more formally written as Wnet = Δ(KE) where Wnet is the net work done on an object (work done by all forces acting on the object). This theorem indicates that work and energy are equivalent quantities. Thus energy has the same units as work (Joules). Sometimes energy is referred to as “the ability to do work”. (Note: although simplifications were made in order to arrive at the conclusion Wnet = Δ(KE), it can be shown with more mathematics that the same conclusion is true for any number of forces on mass m, applied at any angles: the net work done on an object always equals its change in kinetic energy). (14 minutes) Kinetic energy (KE = mv2/2) is often referred to as “energy of motion”, since clearly KE only exists if v is not zero. Going forward we will see that it is only one of several different types of energy. Consider now lifting an object from the ground to height h above the ground. In order to do so we would need to apply a force equals to the object’s weight (mg) where g is the Earth’s gravitational field strength (9.8 meters per second squared), over a distance h. Since the force is parallel to the motion, the work done by the lifter in this case is simply W =force x distance = mgh . We now define this quantity as gravitational potential energy (PEg): PEg = mgh. In examples which do not involve any other kinds of potential energy, we can drop the subscript g and simply write PE = mgh. Here h = height measured above some arbitrary reference level. (Note: it may seem strange that this reference level is arbitrary, implying that PEg can take on virtually any value; however we shall see that, in any practical application, the important quantity is the change in PEg (ΔPEg = mgΔh), which doesn’t depend on the reference level, since the change in height Δh doesn’t depend on the reference level). (5 minutes) Teacher introduce practice exercise): (1 minute) Suppose a tabletop is 0.9 meters above the ground. A 1.0-kg book is lifted to a height 0.5 meters above the table, then dropped. Calculate the change of potential energy of the book (a) using the tabletop as the reference level, and (b) using the floor as the reference level. Students work on calculation, consulting classmates if they wish (6 minutes). Teacher present solution (3 minutes): (a) At 0.5 meters above the tabletop, the potential energy is mgh = (1.0 kg)(9.8 m/s2)(0.5 m) = 4.9 Joules On the tabletop, the potential energy is zero since that was defined as the reference level. Thus the change of potential energy is 0 – 4.9 Joules = - 4.9 Joules (b) Using the floor as the reference level, the initial height is 0.9 m + 0.5 m = 1.4 m, so the potential energy is mgh = (1.0 kg)(9.8 m/s2)(1.4 m) = 13.72 Joules After the book has fallen to the tabletop, it is 0.9 meters above the floor. Thus the potential energy is mgh = (1.0 kg)(9.8 m/s2)(0.9 m) = 8.82 Joules Thus the change in potential energy is 8.82 Joules – 13.72 Joules = - 4.9 Joules, Which is the same result as obtained in part (a). So far we have encountered KE and gravitational PE. We shall see that there are numerous other types of energy as well; however many problems involve only KE and PE. As an example, consider an object of mass m falling freely from rest from height h above the floor (which we shall use as the reference level). Before it falls, it is at rest so its KE is zero. At height h its PE is equal to mgh. When it lands, its PE is zero since it is now at height zero; what about its KE? We can solve for its velocity using the kinematic equation previously referenced: v2 = v02 + 2ad. Since it starts from rest (v0 = 0), it follows that v2 = 2gh, since the acceleration is –g and the displacement is –h (note that the negatives cancel out). Then the kinetic energy is KE = mv2/2 = m(2gh)/2 = mgh, which is the same as the initial potential energy. What have we just concluded? At the beginning of the fall, all of the energy is potential. At the bottom, all of the energy is kinetic. The KE at the bottom has been proven to be equal to the PE at the top. Thus it is correct to say that the sum of the KE plus PE is the same at the top and bottom (equal to mgh). Using the same set of equations, it can be shown that the sum of KE and PE is equal to the same value (mgh) at any point during the fall. (10 minutes) Finally we define the sum of KE plus PE as Mechanical Energy: Mechanical Energy = KE + PE The example just completed is a simple example of the Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy: In the absence of friction and air resistance, the sum of kinetic plus potential energy is conserved. (Note: if there are springs or similar elastic objects in a problem, then there exists another type of potential energy - elastic PE – which must be included in the conservation law. We shall encounter elastic PE a bit later). One may be tempted to ask: what is the good of this law, since we were able to calculate the speed of the object at the bottom of its fall by other means? If the only problem that this law could be used to solve were that of freely falling objects, indeed it would not be terribly useful. However, consider also an object of mass m sliding down a curved frictionless track which begins from rest at height h above the ground. At the top its KE is zero (since it is motionless), and its PE is mgh. At the bottom its PE is zero. A quick comparison reveals that, from the point of view of mechanical energy, this problem is exactly the same as that of a freely falling object, which we just solved! Therefore its kinetic energy at the bottom is, once again, equal to mgh. This is a problem that could not be solved using kinematic equations, since for the curved track the acceleration is not constant. In fact, throughout history the Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy has been demonstrated to be true for a wide variety of systems. In the coming days you will apply this Law to a device that you will build in class. (7 minutes)