Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Plant – soil food web interactions and climate change Franciska T. de Vries Outline 1. Soil food webs and aboveground-belowground linkages 2. Land use impacts on soil food webs and their functioning 3. Resistance and resilience of soil food webs to climate change 4. Conclusions and outlook Linkages between plants and soil organisms Wardle et al. 2004. Science 304, 1629-1633 The detritus soil food web mites and Collembola fungi fungalfeeding nematodes Fungal decomposition pathway predatory mites organic matter bacteria bacterialfeeding nematodes earthworms protozoa omnivorous and predatory nematodes Bacterial decomposition pathway Aboveground – belowground linkages Intensity of management Fast Fast growing, growing, short short lived lived High High N N uptake uptake High High litter litter quality quality Slow Slow growing, growing, long long lived lived Low Low N N uptake uptake Low Low litter litter quality quality Plants Bacterial-dominated Bacterial-dominated soil soil food food web web Fungal-dominated Fungal-dominated soil soil food food web web Food web Rapid Rapid decomposition decomposition and and mineralization mineralization Low Low soil soil CC sequestration sequestration High High N N supply supply rates rates Low Low potential potential plantplantmicrobial microbial associations associations Slow Slow decomposition decomposition and and mineralization mineralization High High soil soil CC sequestration sequestration Low Low N N supply supply rates rates High High plant-microbial plant-microbial associations associations Processes Restoration management Modified after Wardle et al., 2004 Science 304, 1629-1633 Linkages between plant traits and microbial communities across spatial scales A. Individual plant level Orwin et al. 2010. J. Ecol 98:1074-1083. B. Community/landscape-level De Vries et al. 2012, in review Microbes control N form and availability in soil De Vries and Bardgett 2012. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, in press. Background painting Tiny van Velzen Reduced N leaching with higher fungal biomass 7 4.0 3.5 Improved 3.0 Unimproved 6 5 2.5 4 2.0 3 1.5 2 1.0 0.5 1 0.0 0 0 0.05 0.1 F/B ratio 0.15 0 2 4 6 8 10 Fungal PLFA (nmol g-1) Smaller amount of 15N leached with greater F/B ratio Microbial community immobilises more 15N if more fungi present De Vries, Bloem, Quirk, Stevens, Bol, and Bardgett, in review Potential threats to soil biodiversity “…a preliminary assessment of where soil biodiversity is threatened. This includes areas of high population density and/or intense agricultural activity (e.g. cereals and industrial crops, animal husbandry, greenhouses, fruit orchards, vineyards and horticulture).” From: The implementation of the Soil Thematic Strategy and ongoing activities, 13 February 2012, EC report EU 7th Framework SOILSERVICE project Land use impacts on soil food webs and their functioning across Europe 5 farms in each country 3 intensities High – wheat rotation Czech Republic (CZ) Greece (GR) Sweden (SE) England (UK) Increasing temperature Medium – bean rotation Low – permanent grassland Increasing rainfall Land use effects on soil food webs - Fungal energy channel more vulnerable to agricultural management - Fungal energy channel biomass increases with organic matter De Vries, Thébault, Liiri, Birkhofer et al. in prep. Links between soil food webs and ecosystem services Bacterial decomposition channel linked to increased N mineralisation and leaching AM fungi linked to reduced N leaching De Vries, Thébault, Liiri, Birkhofer et al. in prep. Land use impacts on soil food webs are consistent across Europe: 1.Intensive management reduces biomass and diversity 2.Fungal decomposition pathway more vulnerable Bacterial decomposition channel linked to increased N leaching Does this have consequences for ecosystem functioning under climate change? Impacts of climate change CLIMATE CHANGE Direct feedback Indirect feedback Temperature Extreme events Elevated CO2 Temperature/precipitation Net Primary Production Litter DOC CO2 Autotrophic respiration Nutrient cycle feedback Rhizodeposits Heterotrophic respiration Microbial biomass Soil fauna SOIL ORGANIC MATTER Bardgett et al. (2008) The ISME Journal 2:805-814. Increased frequency of extreme weather events drought followed by heavy rainfall -disrupts soil structure -kills microbes and soil fauna → loss of functional stability increased losses of C and N Effects of field drought on food webs Wheat Control Grass Drought Control Drought favours the fungal decomposition pathway Drought Soil food web resistance to glasshouse-based drought Resistance of grassland soil food web increases after field drought Grassland microarthropods more resistant to drought Fungal decomposition channel more resistant to drought than bacterial decomposition channel De Vries, Liiri, Bjørnlund, Bowker, Christensen, Setälä, and Bardgett 2012. Nature Climate Change 2:276-280 Soil food web and ecosystem functioning (day 1) -0.17 N2O production -0 .0 3 -0.14P = 0.04 1 4 0.0 0 .0 0 R2 =0.02 Respiration 1 0 . -0 0 .1 PLFA evenness 0.51 P<0.001 6 0.0 7 0 -0. -0.13 0.08 Microarthropod richness F/B channel ratio R2 =0.32 -0.26P =0.03 Respiration strongly controls N cycling F/B channel ratio mitigates CO2 flush Microbial evenness controls N leaching -0.39 P <0.001 R2 =0.02 R2 =0.25 Total N leached De Vries, Liiri, Bjørnlund, Bowker, Christensen, Setälä, and Bardgett 2012. Nature Climate Change 2:276-280 Fungal-based soil food webs more resistant and better able to adapt to drought Soil food web controls ecosystem functioning: -C and N losses less affected by drought in fungal-based soil food webs Legacy effects of drought on plant growth 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 no plants 1 plants 0.5 0 C D Control C D Field drought Wheat C D Control C D Field drought Grass Drought increased plant growth Presence of a plant increased DOC leaching (but reduced N leaching) De Vries, Liiri, Bjørnlund, Setälä, Christensen, and Bardgett 2012. Oecologia, in press Legacy effects of drought on soil food webs Wheat Grass 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0 -0.2 -0.2 -0.4 -0.4 -0.6 -0.6 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0 -0.2 -0.2 -0.4 -0.4 -0.6 -0.6 No plant Plant Field control Field drought No plant Plant Wheat plant increases recovery of fungal- and bacterial-feeding nematodes De Vries, Liiri, Bjørnlund, Setälä, Christensen, and Bardgett 2012. Oecologia, in press Recovery of the soil food web linked to soil C availability Plants can affect the recovery of soil organisms through their belowground C inputs De Vries, Liiri, Bjørnlund, Setälä, Christensen, and Bardgett 2012. Oecologia, in press Conclusions Plants and soil food webs tightly linked: •Plant traits explain microbial communities on a landscape scale •Belowground plant inputs govern response to drought Intensive agriculture reduces diversity and biomass of the soil food web, and causes a shift towards more bacterial-based soil communities, with implications for ecosystem functioning! Fungal-based food webs deliver ecosystem services: •They reduce N losses from soil; •They are more resistant to drought •C-rich soils have greater recovery after drought Can we promote fungal-based food webs to make agriculture more sustainable? Conclusions Management options to promote fungal-based food webs: De Vries and Bardgett 2012. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, in press Richard Bardgett Jake Bishop Lisa Bjornlund Jaap Bloem Roland Bol Matt Bowker Soren Christensen Tina d’Hertefeld Cristina Escolar Lena Folkvard Petersen Katarina Hedlund Mira Liiri Marina Louzada Pete Manning Simon Mortimer Helen Quirk Heikki Setälä Annette Spangenberg Carly Stevens Elisa Thébault Nicola Thompson Lorna Trimnell Louise Walker Victor van Velzen Meint Veninga An Vos All SOILSERVICE project partners