Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
A Story of Swapped Ends Janet D. Rowley Science 340, 1412 (2013); DOI: 10.1126/science.1241318 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Permission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles can be obtained by following the guidelines here. The following resources related to this article are available online at www.sciencemag.org (this information is current as of July 16, 2013 ): Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found in the online version of this article at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6139/1412.full.html Supporting Online Material can be found at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2013/06/20/340.6139.1412.DC1.html A list of selected additional articles on the Science Web sites related to this article can be found at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6139/1412.full.html#related This article cites 17 articles, 4 of which can be accessed free: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6139/1412.full.html#ref-list-1 This article appears in the following subject collections: Genetics http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/genetics Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright 2013 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS. Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on July 16, 2013 If you wish to distribute this article to others, you can order high-quality copies for your colleagues, clients, or customers by clicking here. PERSPECTIVES GENETICS A Story of Swapped Ends Forty years ago, a chromosomal translocation was discovered to cause leukemia and revealed cancer as a genetic disease. Online Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 1412 Distinguishing chromosomes. New staining techniques developed in the 1970s allowed the visualization of characteristic banding patterns on chromosomes. Janet Rowley (shown) used images of banded chromosomes (white on black background) to show that the Philadelphia chromosome in CML was a translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22. Among these patients were two with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), where banding revealed that a piece of chromosome 8 had broken off and joined chromosome 21. This was the first recurring chromosomal translocation [t(8;21)] to be identified (5). Were chromosomal changes consistent in other leukemias? It was already known that CML patients in terminal blast crisis showed a gain in middle-size chromosomes; these, I discovered, all turned out to be chromosome 8. What was even more startling was that chromosome 9 had an extra piece of material whose staining resembled that of the missing piece of the Ph chromosome (by then, known to be chromosome 22). This suggested that the Ph chromosome could be the result of a translocation involving the swapped ends of chromosome 9 and chromosome 22. Leukemia cells from the same patients in the chronic phase of CML showed the same (9;22) translocation, whereas nonleukemia cells from their peripheral blood had a normal karyotype. It seemed quite likely that the Ph chromosome was an acquired translocation, a finding I reported 40 years ago (6). There the matter stood for a decade. In the meantime, Herbert Abelson had isolated a virus that induced B cell leukemia. The “Abelson” virus could transform normal murine lymphocytes and fibroblasts, and the causative viral factor was a protein with tyrosine kinase activity (v-Abl). The human counterpart of the Abelson viral gene, ABL, was mapped to chromosome 9 (7). Moreover, the only additional DNA found in the Ph chromosome was from chromosome 9 (8).The laborious task of cloning the chromosomal breakpoint in CML revealed that the ABL gene on chromosome 9 was translocated into part of a gene called the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) in chromosome 22, creating a BCR-ABL gene fusion (9–11). The only previously cloned translocation breakpoints, namely the t(8;14) in Burkitt lymphoma (B cells), had involved an oncogene called MYC (the human counterpart of the viral oncogene v-myc), and the immunoglobulin gene on chromosome 14 (12, 13). The discovery that oncogenes were involved in translocation breakpoints proved to be a remarkable validation of virology and of cytogenetics, fields that were struggling to show their relevance to human cancer. That CML involved the human oncogene ABL was welcome corroboration. Additional translocations were found to involve oncogenes as well, a few of which encoded tyrosine kinases like ABL; others involved genes that activate transcription factors that function in cell growth, differentiation, and even cell death. It was fortuitous that at the same time, drug companies were developing tyrosine kinase inhibitors. From this focus emerged imatinib (marketed as Gleevec), the compound eventually approved in 2001 to treat CML (and later, for other cancers). Like all tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib prevents the protein (BCR-ABL, in the case of CML) from phosphorylating proteins that promote cancer development (14). This pharmaceutical breakthrough came almost 50 years after the discovery of the Ph chromosome. Imatinib changed CML from a disease with a 3- to 5-year average life span to one where patients have an almost normal life expectancy, especially with the advent of new second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. These later drugs, especially ponatinib, have been designed to be 21 JUNE 2013 VOL 340 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org Published by AAAS CREDIT: UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER I t was dubbed the “Philadelphia chromosome,” named after the city where the abnormal chromosome was first described in 1960 ( 1). Peter Nowell, of the University of Pennsylvania, and David Hungerford, at the Fox Chase Cancer Center, had taken a close look at patients with chronic myeloid leukesciencemag.org mia (CML) and found Podcast interview that regardless of sex, with author Janet they had a very small Rowley (http://scim.ag/ chromosome. It was a ed_6139). turning point in cancer biology—the beginning of a story that would draw new attention to chromosome abnormalities as a cause of cancer, a phenomenon that still influences our understanding of the disease. To appreciate the importance of the discovery of Nowell and Hungerford, it is necessary to understand the state of biomedical science in the 1950s. The prevailing view from studies of experimentally induced cancer was that chromosome abnormalities were the result of genomic instability in cancer cells, not the cause. It was assumed that loss of DNA from the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome (originally thought to be a deletion in chromosome 21) included genes that regulate cell growth, thereby leading to unrestrained proliferation of leukocytes. The situation was complicated because some patients with CML lacked the Ph chromosome and surprisingly, they had a shorter survival than did those with a Ph chromosome (2). Nonetheless, the presence of the Ph chromosome became an important diagnostic tool in hematology, and it appeared to be the exception to the established view that chromosome changes were variable and irrelevant in cancer. The situation changed dramatically in the 1970s when several new staining techniques revealed chromosomes with unique banding patterns (transverse stripes) that allowed them to be distinguished individually and precisely (3, 4). Having learned a banding technique at Oxford University, I returned to the University of Chicago to apply the method to chromosome samples from leukemia patients. Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on July 16, 2013 Janet D. Rowley PERSPECTIVES tions is the same in both. Moreover, the genes involved have the same function in both cases (17). Thus, translocations are remarkably similar in function, though not necessarily in their frequency in individual cancers. It is likely that next-generation sequencing will reveal a much higher incidence of gene fusions in solid tumors. But this method is a two-edged sword. It has identified numerous chromosomal translocations and deletions, but which of these lead to altered gene function and which are inconsequential? It will be difficult to distinguish them in the future without characterizing RNA from the tumors. A goal of personalized medicine is to identify virtually all of the targetable genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in a patient’s tumor through next-generation sequencing and other technologies. To evolve targeted treatments for cancer, we also need a more sophisticated understanding of tumor-specific antigens and chromatin modifications, for example. There likely will be many surprises along the way, and paradigms will be discarded. Neverthe- less, the goal will always be the same—to treat disease and benefit the patient. Reference and Notes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. P. C. Nowell, D. A. Hungerford, Science 132, 1497 (1960). J. Whang-Peng et al., Blood 32, 755 (1968). T. Caspersson et al., Exp. Cell Res. 60, 315 (1970). A. T. Sumner et al., Nat. New Biol. 232, 31 (1971). J. D. Rowley, Ann. Genet. 16, 109 (1973). J. D. Rowley, Nature 243, 290 (1973). N. Heisterkamp et al., Nature 299, 747 (1982). A. de Klein et al., Nature 300, 765 (1982). N. Heisterkamp et al., Nature 306, 239 (1983). J. Groffen et al., Cell 36, 93 (1984). E. Shtivelman et al., Nature 315, 550 (1985). R. Dalla-Favera et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 6497 (1982). R. Taub et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 7837 (1982). B. J. Druker et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1031 (2001). B. Vogelstein et al., Science 339, 1546 (2013). A. T. Shaw et al., Lancet Oncol. 12, 1004 (2011). F. Mitelman et al., Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 233 (2007). Acknowledgements: I gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful criticisms of B. Drucker, K. Janssen, M. Le Beau, F. Mitelman, Y. Nakamura, and D. Rowley. 10.1126/science.1241318 PHYSICS Critical Mass in Graphene Contact with a layer of boron nitride provides a route to control the electronic properties of graphene. Michael S. Fuhrer O ne of the most striking properties of graphene, a single-atom-thick layer of carbon, is that the electrons behave as if they have no mass. They move at a constant velocity, regardless of their energy, much like photons, the more familiar massless particles of light. Special relativity tells us that a minimum energy E = 2m0c2 is required to create a particle and antiparticle of rest mass m0 (c is the speed of light; the 2 occurs because two particles are created). Because photons have no rest mass, a pair of photons can be created with energies all the way down to zero energy. In a solid, the band gap energy Eg = 2m0v2 is the energy required to create an electron and hole (particle and antiparticle), where m0 is the effective mass and v is the Fermi velocity (typically less than the speed of light by a factor of several hundred). Thus, mass and band gap are intimately related; no mass equates to no band gap, and until now that was the end of the story in graphene. On page 1427 of this issue, Hunt et al. (1) show that electrons in graphene can gain a mass under the right circumstances. School of Physics, Monash University, Monash, 3800 Victoria, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] The massless property of graphene’s electrons is due to the symmetry of the lattice: The simplest repeat unit, the unit cell, has two identical carbon atoms (see the figure, panel A). There are thus two zeroenergy states: one in which the electron resides on atom A, the other in which the electron resides on atom B. Both the elec- tron and hole states exist at exactly zero energy, hence zero band gap and zero mass (see the figure, panel B). But what happens if the two atoms in the unit cell are not identical? An extreme case is hexagonal boron nitride (hBN)—it too has a hexagonal lattice structure analogous to that of graphene, but with one boron atom and one nitrogen atom Mass and band gap. (A) Graphene has two atoms in its unit cell, labeled A and B. (B) If A and B are identical (have the same energy), then graphene electrons have zero mass and a gapless dispersion relation [energy E versus momentum (px, py)]. All electronic states exist equally on both atoms (denoted by magenta in dispersion relation). (C) When the energy of atom A is raised relative to atom B, electron states primarily on atom A (red in dispersion relation) have higher energy than electron states primarily on atom B (blue in dispersion relation) and a band gap Eg is opened. If we examine electron states that reside primarily on atom A (red in dispersion relation), we find a positive curvature of the energy versus momentum relation (red dashed curve) and thus positive mass for these states. (D) When the energy of atom A is lowered relative to atom B, states on atom A have an energy versus momentum relation with negative curvature (red dashed curve) and thus negative mass. www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 340 21 JUNE 2013 Published by AAAS 1413 Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on July 16, 2013 effective despite mutations in the activation domain of the ABL protein. Whereas translocations were first identified in leukemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas, they are now cropping up in many common epithelial tumors, prostate cancer, and lung cancer, among others. Next-generation sequencing of leukemias and solid tumors has revealed a host of translocations (often small deletions or inversions) (15), some of which involve genes that are targets of drugs already approved for therapy of other conditions. It took only a few years from the discovery of the EML4-ALK translocation in lung cancer to the development of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib (16), indicating that the discovery of new translocations may be more rapidly translatable to drug discovery. Although data on the occurrence and types of new translocations, based on karyotype analysis, are more frequently reported for hematologic cancers (75%) than for solid cancers (mainly epithelial) (25%), the proportion of malignancies that have recurring chromosomal transloca-