Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Quarterly Update Maryland Radiological Society Spring 2013 Fall 2012 Resident & Fellow Section From the President It is my privilege to serve as the President of the Maryland Radiological Society and I would like to take this opportunity to thank Past President Albert L. Blumberg, MD, FACR for his over 20 years of service to the MRS and his long-term engagement in the legislative efforts directed towards preservation of Maryland’s self-referral law banning non-radiologist involvement for financial gain with CT, MR and radiation oncology services. Dr. Blumberg was elected President of the ACR during the recent 90th Annual Meeting and Chapter Leadership Conference (AMCLC) in Washington, DC, and we are looking forward to his continuing leadership. The MRS had a strong presence during the 2013 AMCLC and was well represented during our lobbying visit to the Capitol Hill. The most important continued on page 2 Maryland ACR Annual ACOs & Bundled Radiological Meeting Payments Highlights Society Katarzyna J. Macura, M.D., Ph.D President, MRS The Executive Board of the Maryland Radiological Society approved the creation of the Resident Fellow Section (RFS) for the Maryland Radiological Society during its meeting on June 18, 2013. The RFS purpose will be: 1. To provide a unified voice for radiology residents in Maryland 2. To promote the interchange of information and opinion between resident physicians and fellows in training programs in Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, and their subspecialties throughout the State of Maryland 3. To assist in maintaining consistency in standards for radiological residency and fellowship training programs throughout the State of Maryland as set by various regulatory organizations; 4. To provide a forum for the education of residents and fellows in the ethical and socioeconomic aspects of the practice of radiology 5. To provide a mechanism for input and involvement by residents and fellows in the educational, socioeconomic, and policy-making functions of the Radiological Society of Maryland. MRS Spring Meeting Report Gene Ransom Daniel Seeburg, MD, PhD CEO, MedChi Presented on May 21, 2013 Attending the resident and fellow section (RFS) of the ACR AMCLC in Washington, D.C. was an eye-opening experience. As a second year radiology resident at Hopkins, I hadn’t heard much about the ACR, and was eager to learn more about it. We spent the first two days with hundreds of other first time and returning residents and fellows, who had traveled to D.C. At the spring general meeting for the Maryland Radiological Society Gene Ransom, MedChi CEO examined the structure and operations of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Ransom discussed current and future ACOs in Maryland and examined how ACOs will affect radiology practice and patients. continued on page 3 continued on page 4 Fall 2012 Gene Ransom (left) and Albert Blumberg, MD, FACR (right) MRS Quarterly Update Spring 2013 Page 2 From the President Katarzyna J. Macura, M.D., Ph.D continued from page 1 issues that we discussed with legislators were: 1) opposition to the Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) to the Professional Component (PC) of diagnostic imaging services urging Representatives and Senators to cosponsor H.R. 846/S.623 (the Diagnostic Imaging Access Protection Act) which blocks further implementation of the PC MPPR; 2) enacting meaningful imaging utilization management policies that will apply computerized decision support (CDS) tools to reduce the number of incorrect or inappropriate exams, focus on education of ordering physicians as to what imaging tests are the most appropriate for their patients, and provide meaningful data to better determine the best use of imaging resources in the future. We visited offices of Representatives Andrew Harris, Christopher Van Hollen, Charles Albert “Dutch” Ruppersberger III, John Sarbanes, and John Delaney, as well as Senators Barbara Mikulski and Benjamin Cardin. very refreshing to see radiologists in training so enthusiastically engaging in the advocacy efforts on behalf of our specialty. With impending changes to the health care delivery and reimbursements, the radiology community must critically reevaluate the role of radiologists in health care and develop new Passing of the President’s Gavel:Past and Current MRS Presidents processes for improved Albert Blumberg, MD, FACR and Katarzyna J. Macura, MD, PhD engagement with referring physicians and patients in a patient-centered service and behavioral changes of radiologists model with continuous improvement will need to be implemented to optimize of quality and safety of imaging care. To high-value imaging care in the future that end, the ACR developed an initiative health care delivery systems. I encourage called Imaging 3.0 that describes the new you to learn more about this initiative direction for the radiology practice in on the ACR website as Imaging 3.0 is a which our services will be delivered with call to action to all radiologists to take applying principles of appropriateness, a leadership role in shaping America’s quality, safety, and efficiency while future health care system: shifting from the current paradigm focused on volume to the future valueht t p : / / w w w. a c r. o rg / Ad vo c a c y / based radiology. A set of tools enabled Economics-Health-Policy/Imaging-3 by advances in informatics, i.e. CDS tools, Maryland Radiological Society We were fortunate to have 5 residents join us during the Capitol Hill visit, and they share their experience in a separate note in this newsletter. It is Fall 2012 MRS Meeting with Senator Ben Cardin Back Row: Anand Narayan, Chris Trimble, Arvind Sivakumaran, Robert Paley Front Row: Katarzyna Macura, Behram Pastakia, Senator Ben Cardin, Albert Blumberg, Loralie Ma, Mahadevappa Mahesh MRS Quarterly Update Spring 2013 Page 3 ACR Annual Meeting Highlights Daniel Seeburg, MD, PhD continued from page 1 from all across the country. We listened to lectures on RAD-PAC, and the importance of engaging our congressmen and senators to inform them about our profession. We learned about the state of radiology, and how within our present shifting landscape of medicine, radiology will have to transform itself from a volume-based practice to a value-added practice. ACR’s “Imaging 3.0” campaign is taking the lead in this transition with lots of good ideas, including providing new decision-support software based on ACR appropriateness criteria to assist ordering physicians and patients in selecting the most appropriate examination. MRS Meeting with Maryland Congressional Representative John Sarbanes Back Row: Chris Trimble, Robert Paley, Behram Pastakia, Dan Seeburg, Albert Blumberg Representative John Sarbanes, Rebecca Wright, Anand Narayan Front Row: Serena Liebengood, Katarzyna Macura, Loralie Ma, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Arvind Sivakumaran Maryland Radiological Society A related and important point was made many times over the course of the meeting: The traditional fee-for service model will be progressively making way for value-based reimbursement models. We heard residents debate the pros and cons of both systems, and heard a guest lecture by the chief quality officer of Intermountain Health Care who has been a pioneer in outcomes-based value and patient-centered care models. One of the highlights of the meeting was the lunch presentation by Richard Duszak, CEO of the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute (HPI). In a valuebased medical care environment, it will be incumbent upon us as radiologists to demonstrate our value and relevancy to patient care. The HPI is at the forefront of this endeavor, and is sponsoring and conducting evidence-based research projects to study the value and role of radiology in evolving health care delivery and payment systems. Another highlight was our trip to Capitol Hill on the final day of the meeting. We met with several of our Maryland congressmen and their staffers, and discussed how MPPR policies overestimate perceived efficiencies within the professional component and are not supported by sound data. We also discussed how our incentives are aligned with those of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in terms of cutting costs of unnecessary imaging studies. Towards that end, we outlined the physician ordering support tools based on the ACR appropriateness criteria that ACR is offering to make available to physicians in the Medicare program at no cost. Attending the annual meeting of the ACR was a memorable experience and I look forward to attending again next year. In the interim, we will continue to spread the word and get more Maryland radiology residents interested and involved in the ACR. Fall 2012 The 2013-2014 ACR Board of Chancellors: Three of MRS members serve on the Board Albert L. Blumberg, MD, FACR (ACR President), Jonathan S. Lewin, MD, FACR (ARRS Representative & Chair Commission on Clinical Research and Informatics), Katarzyna J. Macura, MD, PhD (Chair Commission for Women and General Diversity) MRS Quarterly Update Spring 2013, Page 4 ACOs & Bundled Payments Gene Ransom CEO, MedChi Presented on May 21, 2013 continued from page 1 Ransom explained that integrated care delivery models are causing the industry to shift away from a fee-for-service model and payors are looking to make fixed payments to care physicians for treating a specific patient population. The federal ACO program is only the beginning of a larger shift in how care is paid for nationally. Meeting with Maryland Congressional Representative Christopher Van Hollen Back Row: Arvind Sivakumaran, Anand Narayan, Representative Van Hollen, Behram Pastakia, Chris Trimble, Dan Seeburg Front Row: Rebecca Wright, Loralie Ma, Serena Liebengood, Katarzyna Macura, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Robert Paley Maryland currently has ten approved privately created ACOs. A federal ACO must have at least 5,000 Medicare beneficiaries. Beneficiaries are assigned based on the location where they receive the majority of their primary care services. The federal program provides no required network or other restrictions and patients may opt-out. Federal law also requires that at least 75% of the ACO governing board must consist of health care providers participating within the ACO. ACOs must strive to achieve the 3 CMS goals of better patient care, improved population health, and lower costs. Maryland Radiological Society MRS Executive Board President Katarzyna J. Macura MD, PhD Vice President Robert M. Stroud MD Fall 2012 Secretary Rathan Subramaniam MD, PhD, MPH Treasurer Matthew L. Snyder MD Contact Gina Sirolli Advanced Radiology 7253 Ambassador Rd. Baltimore, MD 21244 [email protected] (443) 436-1114 www.acr.org/Membership/Chapters/Maryland-Radiological-Society Albert Blumberg presenting ACR Congressional Award for Radiological Excellence to Maryland Senator Ben Cardin