Download Elementary Functions More Zeroes of Polynomials The Rational

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup

Horner's method wikipedia , lookup

Polynomial wikipedia , lookup

Factorization of polynomials over finite fields wikipedia , lookup

Division by zero wikipedia , lookup

System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup

Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
More Zeroes of Polynomials
In this lecture we look more carefully at zeroes of polynomials.
(Recall: a zero of a polynomial is sometimes called a “root”.)
Our goal in the next few presentations is to set up a strategy for
attempting to find (if possible) all the zeroes of a given polynomial. We
will assume, for this section, that our polynomial has coefficients which are
integers. We will then set up some tests to run on the polynomial so that
we can make some guesses at possible roots of the polynomial and begin
to factor it.
Elementary Functions
Part 2, Polynomials
Lecture 2.5a, The Rational Root Test
Dr. Ken W. Smith
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra tells us that a polynomial of degree
n has n zeroes, if we include complex roots and if we count the
multiplicity of the roots.
Sam Houston State University
2013
We will be particularly interested in finding all the zeroes for various
polynomials of small degree, n = 3, n = 4 or maybe n = 5.
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
1 / 35
The Rational Root Test
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
2 / 35
The Rational Root Test
A rational number is a number which can be written as a ratio db where
both the numerator b and the denominator d are integers (whole numbers).
Consider the simple linear polynomial 3x − 5.
It has one zero, x = 53 .
This zero, 53 , is a rational number with numerator given by the constant
term 5 and denominator given by the leading coefficient 3 of this (small)
polynomial.
This concept generalizes. If we are factoring a polynomial
In this part of our lecture, we describe the set of all possible rational
numbers which might be the root of our polynomial.
f (x) = an xn + an−1 xn−1 + ... + a2 x2 + a1 x + a0
We will call this set of all possible rational numbers the rational test set; it
will be a list of numbers to examine in our hunt for roots.
then when we eventually write out the factoring
f (x) = (d1 x − b1 )(d2 x − b2 ) · · · (dn x − bn )
the products of the coefficients d1 d2 · · · dn must equal the leading
coefficient an and the products of the constants b1 b2 · · · bn must equal the
constant term a0 .
This leads to the Rational Root Test.
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
3 / 35
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
4 / 35
The Rational Root Test
Some Worked Examples on the Rational Root Test
Find the set of all possible rational zeroes of the given function, as given
by the Rational Root Theorem.
1 f (x) = 2x3 + 5x2 − 4x − 3
2 f (x) = 3x3 − 4x2 + 5.
3 f (x) = 6x6 + 5x2 + x − 35.
If x = db is a rational number that is the root (zero) of the polynomial
f (x) = an xn + ... + a1 x + a0 then the numerator b is a factor of the
constant term a0 and the denominator d is a factor of the leading
coefficient an .
The effect of the Rational Root Test is that given a polynomial f (x) we
can create a “Test Set” of rational numbers to try as zeroes.
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
5 / 35
Solutions.
1 The set of rational zeroes of f (x) = 2x3 + 5x2 − 4x − 3 is limited to
fractions whose numerator divides 3 and whose denominator divides 2:
Rational Test Set = {±1, ±3, ± 21 , ± 32 }.
2 The set of rational zeroes of f (x) = 3x3 − 4x2 + 5 is limited to
fractions whose numerator divides 5 and whose denominator divides 3:
Rational Test Set = {±1, ±5, ± 31 , ± 53 }.
3 The set of rational zeroes of f (x) = 6x6 + 5x2 + x − 35 is limited to
fractions whose numerator divides 35 and whose denominator divides
6:
Rational Test Set =
1
35
1
5
7
35
1
5
7
35
{±1,
±7, ±35, ± 2 , ± 52Elementary
, ± 72 , ±Functions
Smith ±5,
(SHSU)
2013
35 6
2 , ±3, ±3, ±3, ± 3 , ±6, ±
6 , ± 66, /±
Zeroes of Polynomials
Elementary Functions
In the next presentation we will work through factoring a fifth degree
polynomial and discover upper and lower bounds on the possible zeroes of
a polynomial.
Part 2, Polynomials
Lecture 2.5b, Bounds on the Set of Zeroes
(END)
Dr. Ken W. Smith
Sam Houston State University
2013
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
7 / 35
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
8 / 35
Bounds to the set of zeroes
Bounds on zeroes
In this presentation we work through the details of trying to compute
(exactly) the zeroes of a polynomials. These techniques, over three
centuries old, are now aided by tools such as graphing calculators.
We are trying to factor
f (x) = 2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30
with Rational Test Set equal to
1
3
{± 2 , ±1, ± 2 , ±2, ± 52 , ±3, ±5, ±6, ± 15
2 , ±10, ±15, ±30}.
We work though an example in detail. Suppose we wish to factor
completely the polynomial
We might begin by trying the easier numbers, the integers. Let us first
divide f (x) by x − 1, using synthetic division with c = 1.
f (x) = 2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30.
We first create a “test set” of rational roots to try. Since the constant
term 30 has 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 30 as factors and the leading coefficient 2
has factors 1 and 2 then by the Rational Root Test, our test set of possible
rational roots is
2
1
2
−3
14
15
− 34
− 30
2
−1
13
28
−6
−1
13
28
−6
− 36
1
3
5
15
So f (1) = −36 and so x = 1 is not a zero.
Rational Test Set = {± , ±1, ± , ±2, ± , ±3, ±5, ±6, ± , ±10, ±15, ±30}.
2
2
2
2
This might be discouraging, but doing synthetic division with c = 1 was
pretty easy!
This is a large set of rational numbers to try!
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
9 / 35
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
Bounds on zeroes
Bounds on zeroes
We are factoring
We are factoring
with Rational Test Set =
{± 21 , ±1, ± 32 , ±2, ± 52 , ±3, ±5, ±6, ± 15
2 , ±10, ±15, ±30}.
We tried c = 1 and got f (1) = −36. Now let’s try c = 2.
2
2
We tried c = 1 and got f (1) = −36 and then tried c = 2 and got
−3
14
15
− 34
− 30
4
2
32
94
120
1
16
47
60
90
2
2
2
So x = 2 is not a zero of f (x). Frustrating! But notice two things here.
First notice that the remainder is positive; f (2) = 90.
In our earlier work, we discovered that f (1) = −36 and so, by the IVT, the
graph of the function f (x) crosses the x-axis between x = 1 and x = 2!
Since f (1) is negative and f (2) is positive then there is a zero somewhere
between 1 and 2! This is important information!
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
10 / 35
f (x) = 2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30
f (x) = 2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30
with Rational Test Set equal to
1
3
{± 2 , ±1, ± 2 , ±2, ± 52 , ±3, ±5, ±6, ± 15
2 , ±10, ±15, ±30}.
2
2013
2013
11 / 35
−3
14
15
− 34
− 30
4
2
32
94
120
1
16
47
60
90
We know then that since f (2) = 90, there is a zero between x = 1 and
x = 2. But notice also that the bottom row in our synthetic division with
c = 2 is all positive numbers.
We can conclude from our understanding of synthetic division that if we
were to try a larger positive number c greater than c = 2 then the
numbers on the bottom row would get even larger still and so there is no
2013
12 / 35
We have found an upper bound
on
chanceSmith
of a(SHSU)
zero to the right ofElementary
x = 2.Functions
An Upper Bound
An Upper Bound
We are factoring
f (x) = 2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30
We tried c = 2 and synthetic division gave us
2
Our Rational Test Set is
−3
14
15
− 34
− 30
4
2
32
94
120
1
16
47
60
90
2
2
{± 12 , ±1, ± 32 , ±2, ± 52 , ±3, ±5, ±6, ± 15
2 , ±10, ±15, ±30}.
We found c = 2 is an upper bound on the zeroes of f (x)
Notice that if we try a larger positive number c greater than c = 2 then
since the number in the middle row are created by multiplying by c, then
the numbers on the bottom row will get even larger than they are now. So
there is no chance of a zero to the right of x = 2.
An upper bound for polynomial zeroes: If, upon doing synthetic
division with a positive value c, the bottom row in our computation of
f (c) consists of all positive numbers (or zero) then c is an upper bound for
the zeroes of f (x).
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
13 / 35
We should
not look for zeroes further
to the right of c.
An Upper Bound
2x5
−
3x4
2
3
2
2
Success!! So x =
+
+
15x2
−
3x4
+
14x3
−3
14
15
− 34
− 30
Smith (SHSU)
14 / 35
3
0
21
54
30
0
14
36
20
0
15x2
− 34x − 30 = (2x −
Elementary Functions
3)(x4
+
7x2
We want to find more roots of f (x) but since we have factored out a
linear term, let us now focus on factoring x4 + 7x2 + 18x + 10.
There is an important principle here: once we have found a factor,
concentrate on the quotient that remains. Do not waste time by returning
to the original polynomial.
is a root of f (x) and f (x) factors as
+
2013
2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30 = (2x − 3)(x4 + 7x2 + 18x + 10)
− 34x − 30
3
2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30 = (x − )(2x4 + 14x2 + 36x + 20).
2
It is probably better if we factor a 2 out of the right-hand factor and
multiply it into the linear term and rewrite this as
2x5
Elementary Functions
We discovered that
14x3
Let us go back to our observation that there is a zero between x = 1 and
x = 2. This suggests that we try x = 32 as a root. We do the synthetic
division.
3
2
Smith (SHSU)
Finding zeroes
We continue to attempt to factor
f (x) =
This immediately rules out 52 , 3, 5, 6, 15
2 , 10, 15, 30 as possible zeroes We
need not try any of these.
+ 18x + 10)
2013
15 / 35
Is it clear that this new polynomial (x4 + 7x2 + 18x + 10) has no positive
zeroes?
If we try synthetic division with c = 0 we would just get, as bottom row,
the coefficients 1, 0, 7, 18, 10 which are already positive. Anything to the
right of zero will only makes these numbers bigger.
So we should try some negative numbers.
At this point, since no positive numbers could give a zero and since this
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
16 / 35
Finding zeroes
Finding zeroes
We discovered that
We discovered that
2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30 = (2x − 3)(x4 + 7x2 + 18x + 10)
2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30 = (2x − 3)(x + 1)(x3 − x2 + 8x + 10)
and that there are no more positive roots to find.
and that there are no more positive roots to find.
Let us try c = −1.
We continue on with our factoring by trying to factor x3 − x2 + 8x + 10.
Let’s try c = −2.
1
−1
1
0
7
18
10
−1
1
−8
− 10
−1
8
10
0
1
−2
1
We have found another factor! So
x4 + 7x2 + 18x + 10 = (x + 1)(x3 − x2 + 8x + 10)
and so
2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30 = (2x − 3)(x + 1)(x3 − x2 + 8x + 10).
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
17 / 35
A lower bound on zeroes
−1
8
10
−2
6
− 28
−3
14
− 18
So f (−2) = −18 and so x = −2 is not a zero.
Notice the pattern across the bottom row in our synthetic division. It
alternates, positive 1, negative 3, positive 14, negative 18. If we were try a
negative number to the left of x = −2 on the real line, it would make the
negative 3 more negative, which in turn would give a larger positive value
to the next entry, leading to a bottom line entry larger than positive 14
and then,
in the next step, a number
more negative than negative2013
18. The
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
18 / 35
numbers at each stage are further from zero than they are here.
A lower bound on zeroes
To illustrate this, here is the synthetic division with c = −3 and c = −4.
1
−3
1
1
−4
1
−1
8
10
−3
12
− 60
−4
20
− 50
1
−2
1
−1
8
10
−4
20
− 112
−5
28
− 102
Elementary Functions
8
10
−2
6
− 28
−3
14
− 18
A lower bound for the zeroes of a polynomial: If, upon doing synthetic
division with a negative value c, the bottom row in our computation of
f (c) consists of numbers alternating in sign then c is an lower bound for
the zeroes of f (x).
Notice how the bottom rows continued to alternate, with larger and larger
absolute value.
So x = −2 is a lower bound for our possible roots; there is no reason to
try anything smaller.
We summarize what we have learned here by describing when we know we
have a lower bound for our roots.
Smith (SHSU)
−1
2013
19 / 35
We should not look for zeroes further to the left of c on the number line.
(For the purpose of this result, we can treat zero as positive or negative,
giving it whatever sign we wish.)
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
20 / 35
Finding zeroes
Finding zeroes
Let’s go back and look at our cubic g(x) = x3 − x2 + 8x + 10.
It has y-intercept (0, 10). It is a cubic polynomial with end behavior . %
so we know that although g(0) = 10, eventually to the left of x = 0 the
function becomes negative.
Returning to our earlier factoring problem.
We discovered that
2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30 = (2x − 3)(x + 1)(x3 − x2 + 8x + 10).
By the IVT, this cubic polynomial has a root which is negative, which we
have not yet found.
and that there are no more positive roots to find, and that −2 is a lower
bound of the roots of this polynomial.
Did we try everything? Almost. We tried x = −1, which was a zero of
f (x) and then we agreed that x = −2 was a lower bound on zeroes of
f (x).
We have now ruled out everything else is our Test Set, while discovering
that x = 32 and x = −1 are zeroes of our polynomial. Now what do we do?
What we did not do is test x = −1 twice! Recall that a polynomial can
have a zero with multiplicity two or more....
Let us test x = −1, using synthetic division, with the cubic
x3 − x2 + 8x + 10.
1
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
21 / 35
Smith (SHSU)
−1
−1
8
10
−1
2
− 10
−2
10
0
Elementary Functions
1
2013
22 / 35
Finding zeroes
Finding zeroes
We now have
So x = −1 is a zero a second time and x + 1 is a factor, twice, of f (x).
So x2 − 2x + 10 factors into
2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30 = (2x − 3)(x + 1)2 (x2 − 2x + 10) (1)
x2 − 2x + 10 = (x − (2 + 3i))(x − (2 − 3i)).
Our final factoring of the fifth degree polynomial f (x) is then
f (x) = 2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30 = (2x − 3)(x4 + 7x2 + 18x + 10)
= (2x − 3)(x + 1)(x3 − x2 + 8x + 10) = (2x − 3)(x + 1)2 (x2 − 2x + 10)
= (2x − 3)(x + 1)2 (x − (2 + 3i))(x − (2 − 3i))
Once we reach a quadratic polynomial, we are almost done. Factoring
quadratics are easy!
We can use the quadratic formula if we don’t see an obvious factoring. In
this case, if
x2 − 2x + 10 = 0
then
x=
4±
√
2
−36
=
Here is the graph of y = f (x).
4 ± 6i
= 2 ± 3i.
2
Thus the quadratic equation x2 − 2x + 10 has two complex roots
(appearing, of course, as conjugate pairs.)
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
23 / 35
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
24 / 35
Finding Zeroes
Elementary Functions
In the next lecture we review these upper and lower bound results and
then look at Descartes’ Rule of Signs.
Part 2, Polynomials
Lecture 2.5c, Bounding the Location of Zeroes
Dr. Ken W. Smith
(END)
Sam Houston State University
2013
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
25 / 35
Upper Bound
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
26 / 35
Lower Bound
In a previous lecture we completely factored a fifth degree polynomial,
discovering along the way, some upper and lower bounds for the roots of a
polynomial.
We summarize what we learned about the upper and lower bounds for our
set of real zeroes.
If, upon doing synthetic division with a positive value c, the bottom row in
our computation of f (c) consists of all positive numbers (or zero) then c is
an upper bound for the zeroes of f (x). We should not look for zeroes
further to the right of c.
If, upon doing synthetic division with a negative value c, the bottom row
in our computation of f (c) consists of numbers alternating in sign then c
is an lower bound for the zeroes of f (x). We should not look for zeroes
further to the left of c on the number line.
(For the purpose of this result, we can treat zero as positive or negative,
giving it whatever sign we wish.)
(For the purpose of this result, we can treat zero as positive.)
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
27 / 35
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
28 / 35
Descartes’ Rule of Signs
Descartes’ Rule of Signs, Positive version
We have one more guide in our search for roots of a polynomial. It is a
“rule” which is four centuries old, discovered by René Descartes.
Examples.
1
The polynomial x3 − 8 has coefficients 1, (0, 0, ) − 8. Ignore the
zeroes; there is one change of sign, from 1 to -8. So the polynomial
has 1 positive root.
2
The polynomial f (x) = 2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30, studied
earlier, has coefficients 2, −3, 14, 15, −34, −30. This changes sign
3 times (from 2 to −3, from −3 to 14 and from 15 to −34.) An upper
bound for the number of positive roots of f (x) is 3. The polynomial
either has 3 positive roots or 1. (As we saw in our work, there was a
pair of complex numbers, and so there was only one positive root.)
Descartes’ Rule of Signs (Positive version)
List the coefficients of a polynomial f (x), from leading coefficient to the
constant term. Count the change of signs. This is an upper bound on the
number of positive roots.
The true number of positive roots may vary from this upper bound by a
multiple of two (since complex number occur in conjugate pairs.)
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
29 / 35
Descartes’ Rule of Signs, Negative version
2013
30 / 35
Examples.
Given the polynomial f (x), list the coefficients of f (−x) (note the
insertion of −x!), from leading coefficient to the constant term. Count the
change of signs.
This is an upper bound on the number of negative roots.
The true number of negative roots may vary from this upper bound by a
multiple of two (since complex number occur in conjugate pairs.)
Elementary Functions
Elementary Functions
Descartes’ Rule of Signs, Negative version
A second version of Descartes’ Rule of Signs is...
Smith (SHSU)
Smith (SHSU)
2013
31 / 35
1
Consider the polynomial g(x) = x3 − 8. g(−x) = −x3 − 8 has
coefficients −1, (0, 0, ) − 8. Ignore the zeroes; there is no change of
sign so the polynomial has no negative roots.
2
Or consider the polynomial
f (x) = 2x5 − 3x4 + 14x3 + 15x2 − 34x − 30, studied earlier.
f (−x) = −2x5 − 3x4 − 14x3 + 15x2 + 34x − 30, has coefficients
−2, −3, −14, 15, 34, −30 which has 2 changes of sign. An upper
bound for the number of negative roots of f (x) is two. The
polynomial either has two negative roots or none. (As we saw in our
work, x = −1 was a root twice.)
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
32 / 35
Descartes’ Rule of Signs, Negative version
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
After the earlier material on complex numbers, we are now able to state
the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra more precisely.
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
A polynomial f (x) = an xn + an−1 xn−1 + a2 x2 + a1 x + a0 with real
coefficients aj , has exactly n zeroes, if we include complex zeroes and also
count the multiplicity of zeroes.
Descartes’ Rule of Signs narrows our search for roots of a polynomial.
Earlier we searched for roots of x3 − 8.
Descartes’ Rule of Signs tells us that that polynomial has 1 positive real
root and 0 negative real roots.
Complex solutions come in conjugate pairs.
If we expect 3 roots then we know that the other two roots must come in
complex conjugate pairs.
Since a zero x = c of a polynomial gives a factor x − c, we can restate this
in terms of factors.
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (Second version)
A polynomial f (x) = an xn + an−1 xn−1 + a2 x2 + a1 x + a0 with real
coefficients aj , factors completely into n linear terms, if we allow factoring
involving complex numbers.
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
33 / 35
2013
35 / 35
Zeroes of Polynomials
In the next lecture we explore rational functions.
(END)
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
Smith (SHSU)
Elementary Functions
2013
34 / 35