* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download L10 - 15.5.2017 Satellite communications File
Cellular network wikipedia , lookup
Radio broadcasting wikipedia , lookup
History of wildlife tracking technology wikipedia , lookup
Cellular repeater wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunication wikipedia , lookup
Satellite television wikipedia , lookup
History of telecommunication wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunications engineering wikipedia , lookup
ELEC-E4240 Satellite systems Satellite communication and communication subsystem Jari Hänninen, Jaan Praks Telstar 1 satellite History History • October 1945 Arthur C. Clarke: the idea of geostationary satellites, the Wireless World magazine ("Extra-Terrestrial Relays", pp. 305–8) • October 1957 Sputnik I: the first satellite • January 1958 Explorer I: the first US satellite • August 1960 Echo I: a passive reflector balloon • July 1962 Telstar I: the first communications satellite (MEO, C band) • July 1964: Intelsat is established • August 1964 Syncom 3: the first geostationary satellite • April 1965 INTELSAT I (Early Bird): the first geostationary satellite for cross-Atlantic communications Why do we communicate? • Platform • Telecommand (orbit control, system configuration) • Telemetry (satellite health monitoring) • Payload • Telecommunications payload • Scientific or observation payload • Usually downlink only Typical customer requirements for telecom system • • • • • • • • • Type of relayed signals Capacity Coverage area Signal strength and quality; types of ground terminals Connectivity (switchboarding) Availability Lifetime (LEO 7 / MEO 12 / GEO 12–15/20+ years) Flexibility Security Communication satellite orbits Roughly 420 satellites Sat TV MEO constellations Iridium LEO Constellations LEO communication has significant advantages as satellites are closer to Earth Pros • • • • • Less free space losses Smaller antennas Smaller terminals Two way communication with hand held terminals Smaller delays Cons - Long revisit time Large Doppler shift Tracking is usually needed A typical satcomms system Credit: Fortescue et al.: Spacecraft Systems Engineering Technical constraints • The usual suspects: • Transmitter power • Receiver sensitivity • Interference • Environment • Available components etc. • Frequency allocations (politics…) • But in satellite systems also • Mass & dimensions • Available power • Survivability (launch, space environment) The challenges Free space loss & atmospheric effects • Radiation power density is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source (in the far field) • Satellite communication links are very long compared to terrestrial microwave links—huge free space loss • Additional attenuation due to atmospheric losses: a big issue for frequencies above 20 GHz (K-Band), can be a problem for X-band in heavy thunder storms and low elevations • (band names: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?reload=true&punumber=8332) • The major absorbing medium is water (water vapor and rain) Atmospheric attenuation Diverse effects of rain (1) • Attenuation • • On most satellite links above 10 GHz rain attenuation limits the availability of the system and needs to be calculated The long-term behaviour of rainfall rate (mm/h, a key quantity) is described by an exceedance curve: it gives the percentage of time (usually a of year) that the rainfall rate exceeds a given value ITU developed rainfall rate exceedance contour maps; for example, ITU-R P.837 includes contours for rain rate exceeded for 0.01 % of the average year To compute the attenuation for a given time percentage (for example, for 0.01 % of a year = 53 minutes of a year) determine the rainfall rate (mm/h) for the time percentage • • calculate the specific attenuation of the signal at this rainfall rate (dB/km) find the effective length of the path with this specific attenuation [difficult] • The specific attenuation γR = k (R0.01)α (dB/km), where R0.01 is the rainfall rate measured for 0.01 % of the average year and k and α are polarisation-dependent coefficients, please see ITU-R P.838 • • • The rain attenuation A = (specific attenuation) × (effective path length in rain) (dB) – The ITU-R procedure for predicting slant-path rain attenuation for geostationary earth orbit (GEO) satellite uplink paths is contained in Section 2.2.1.1 of ITU-R P.618; in addition one needs • ITU-R P.839 ITU-R P.837 ITU-R P.838, ITU-R P.678 and possibly some others, please see ITU-R P.618 • For non-GEO satellites additional computations are required • Diverse effects of rain (2) • Addition of noise • • • • At frequencies below 50 GHz, rain attenuation is mostly caused by absorption (rather than by scattering of the signal energy out of the path) Any absorber will act as a blackbody radiator (emitting white Gaussian noise at frequencies below 300 GHz) Rain will cause signal attenuation (above), depolarisation (below), and an increase in sky temperature Depolarisation • • • Successful orthogonal polarisation frequency sharing (dualpolarisation frequency reuse) requires sufficient isolation between two orthogonal polarisations at the receiving antenna (the wanted polarisation is copolarisation and the unwanted is crosspolarisation) Signals are never purely polarised: energy is converted from one polarisation to another (depolarisation occurs) If asymmetric rain drops or ice crystals exist in the transmission medium, depolarisation will happen Spacecraft RX/TX limitations Basic Communications/Data Rate Constraints (RF) Signal to Noise Ratio Available signal to noise ratio may limit ability of ground station to track the signal or limit data rate. Signal to noise ratio may be limited by: • • • Power of transmitter Antenna size on board and/or on ground System temperature of receiving antenna Bandwidth (the more bandwidth, the higher data rate) Limits depend on: • Type of mission (near Earth or deep space) • Frequency band • Technical implementation (e.g. modulation scheme) Flux Density RF flux density may not exceed certain values on Earth surface Carrying digital signals: keying • • • • • • For transmitting bits (or groups of bits = symbols) over a radio link we need a carrier (sine wave) and a keying scheme (modulation) We must combat noise and intersymbol interference (at least) Intersymbol interference (= consecutive symbols affect each other) arises from filtering of a signal; a bandwidth of at least half the symbol rate (baseband transmission) or at least equal to the symbol rate (double-sideband passband transmission) is required Selecting the proper modulation method, using matched filters ([square-]root-raisedcosine filters), and finding a suitable multiple access method are an art In satellite communications constant-envelope modulations are preferred, especially phase-shift keying (PSK) is used Multiple access: link capacity sharing by allocating bandwidth, time, or codes to users Modulation and keying Noise • All warm matter (T> 0 K) emits noise (blackbody radiation) • The noisiness of amplifiers and receivers can be expressed with • noise temperature Tn (the [equivalent] temperature of a noisy resistor at the input of a noiseless amplifier, such that the output noise power of the amplifier equals the true one) • noise factor F (a factor needed to multiply a reference temperature to obtain the “true” equivalent temperature of a resistor at the input of a noiseless amplifier), F = 1 + Tn/T0, usually T0 = 290 K Noise • The first amplifier of an amplifier chain largely determines the overall noise performance of a system • Attenuators attenuate a signal and add noise • The environmental noise received by an antenna is added to the system noise Eb/N0 and probability of error • Eb: energy per bit; N0: noise density • There is a function that relates the probability of an error (BER) to Eb/N0 for certain modulation schemes • The communications link designer must decide how much error he can accept on the link and find the corresponding Eb/N0 Example: BPSK BER Using coding It becomes possible to obtain coding gain, i.e. to use a noisier signal to get the same BER than without coding Antennas Antenna—the crucial part • A component for converting free-space electromagnetic waves into guided waves to feed circuits (and vice versa) Low Gain Antennas • • • • Coverage of ½ sphere Gain -3dB to 0 dB Isoflux Antennas • • • Coverage of Earth with increase at low elevations Gain X-band about 6 dBi (lower gain in S-band due to size limit) Medium Gain Antennas MGA) • • • • Mild directional coverage Simple construction (e.g. horn), 1-3 m in diameter Gain (S or X-band) 15 dBi to 20 dBi High Gain Antennas (HGA) • • Parabolic dish, 1-3 m in diameter Gain (X-band) 30 to 45 dBi The Friis transmission formula The link budget • Writing the signal-to-noise-power-density ratio in decibels to a table gives us the link budget • Decibels express power ratios: PdB = 10 lg(P/P0) • Using a spreadsheet programme allows experimenting with the system parameters: antenna gain (size), transmitter power, coding gain &c. • For large aperture or reflector antennas • G = 4πηAA/λ2 ≈ 33000/(Δϴq3 dB,degrees) 2, • where ηA is the aperture efficiency and A is the area of the antenna • 3-dB beamwidth Δϴq3 dB,degrees ≈ 75 λ /D, • where D is the diameter of a (circular) antenna A geostationary link budget GPS L1 Link budget Communication and pointing budget Satellite communication strategy affects strongly to satellite pointing and stabilization strategy and antenna design. Magellan Magellan used the same antenna for radar imaging and Earth communication and had to turn the satellite every orbit. Regulations (frequency coordination) Frequency usage of any satellite should be coordinated with ITU • ITU coordinates frequency usage with all countries in the world • The coordination process can take years (no more than 7 years) • Satellite communication has special reserved frequency bands Amateur satellites can use special bands dedicated to Radio Amateurs • Radio Amateur bands are coordinated by International Radio Amateur Union (IARU) • Amateur bands licences are easier and quicker to get • IARU notes ITU on frequency usage Ground segment Ground segment availability defines satellite operations strategy. • Polar orbits have best ground station location near the pole Ground segment K-sat antenna cluster at Swalbard ESA Payload Data Ground Segment (PDGS) PDGS schematic (Credit: ESA) Redundant UHF COM Redundant OBC on Linux Spectral Imager AaSI ADCS Star tracker Aalto-1 S-band COM GPS EPS 3U CubeSat 4 kg 3-axis stabilization Plasma Brake Electronguns RADMON Communication system 2 cold-redundant UHF radios based on CC1125 radio chip + PA Sensitivity: -120dBm Max TX power. 1.2W Mass: 56.4g Power consumption: 0.1W (RX), 3.5W (TX) UHF - 437.220 MHz Beacon Morse code (CW) 9600 baud FSK with G3RUH recursive scrambler and AX.25 protocol Command link Bidirectional, half-duplex 9600 baud FSK with additive scrambler S-band - 2.402 GHz Downlink 500 kilobaud MSK Aalto-1 The Finnish Student Satellite iADCS 100 BST, Hyperion Technologies Mass: 330 g Power: 1.4 W nominal Integrated star tracker 30 arcsecond determination accuracy Aalto-1 The Finnish Student Satellite Radio Licences Aalto-1 has all radio licences Aalto-1 The Finnish Student Satellite Ground Station (OH2AGS) Aalto-1 The Finnish Student Satellite Future Currently FCC is reviewing 21 applications to operate global broadband satellite constellations! Keep eye on: • • • • • • • • • SpaceX Boeing LeoSat Enterprises O3b Networks Spire Global ViaSat Audacy OneWeb Karousel LLC Oneweb Has ordered 890 (sic!) Ku band nanosatellites from Airbus Defense and Space Optical communication Because of increasing traffic in radio frequencies and slow regulatory process increasing amount of communication concepts move to optical communication. Pros and cons • Less restrictions • High throughput • Less risks of eavesdropping • Needs less energy • Needs very accurate attitude control