Download Europe and the Responsive Nation Sate

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Europe and the Responsive Nation Sate Responsive National State: 19th century ∙ Characteristics of the “New nation state”? o Ordinary Citizens felt enhanced loyalty o By 1914 universal suffrage the rule o German Empire/Situation under Bismarck o By 1871 a union of 25 German States in a confederacy governed by the Reichstag and Bismarck. o Attacked church and state in the Kulturkampf o 1873 and worldwide depression saw a new policy of economic protectionism that invoked socialist tendencies despite Bismarck’s disdain. o Social welfare legislation, in response to problems as well as to crush the socialists by weakening their influence he could eliminate their revolutionary language and preserve German statehood. (not enough change) o Dismissed by Wilhelm II in hope of rallying workers o Rise of German Social Democratic Party. o Republican France: o Defeat in France (F/P war) led to the Paris Commune (Revolution…again) o Paris Commune brutally crushed by the National Assembly o Third Republic Established and led by men of vision‐Gambetta and Ferry. o Through plebicite and other means they passed numerous reforms including legalizing unions and creating state run schools, in addition to establishing a colonial empire focusing on Central and Eastern Africa and SE Asia. o After Franceʹs defeat by Germany in 1870, the Third Republic came to be seen as a period of stability and consolidation, despite domestic unrest and the terrible damage done to the country by the First World War. o The Third Republic was proclaimed on 4 September 1870 and Adolphe Thiers became its first President on 31 August 1871, after the Paris Commune uprising was brutally crushed towards the end of May 1871. This regime had a difficult start, but it was to prove the most long‐lasting since the Revolution, surviving right up until 1940. Thiers began as a monarchist, but he was gradually won over to republicanism. The laws defining the organization and operating procedures of government were passed between February and July 1875; but it was only with the elections of 14 and 28 October 1877, which resulted in a republican majority in the Chamber of Deputies, that the new regime was fully recognized. o Dreyfus affair divided country, anti‐catholic movement. State and church severed ties. o Lasts until the Vichy Republic of 39‐40 and is as strong a government as France has until De Gaulle’s fifth republic. o Austria Hungary: o Divided in two in 1866, Magyars ruled Hungary. Consolidated through diplomacy and trade. o Suffered from intense nationalism amongst its populace. o 1900‐1914: Parliament (established after Revolutions of 1848) couldn’t reach a consensus or a majority! o Russia: attempts to Modernize o 1850’s Russia was a poor agrarian society. o Serfdom the order of the day. o Crimean War attempted to accelerate the modernization: o 1853‐56, war between Russia on the one hand and the Ottoman Empire, England, France, and Sardinia on the other. The causes of the conflict were inherent in the unsolved Eastern Question . The more immediate occasion was a dispute between Russia and France over the Palestinian holy places. Challenging the claim of Russia to guardianship of the holy places, France in 1852 secured from Sultan Abd al‐
Majid certain privileges for the Latin churches. Russian counterdemands were turned down (1853) by the Ottoman government. In July, 1853, Russia retorted by occupying the Ottoman vassal states of Moldavia and Walachia, and in October, after futile negotiations, the Ottomans declared war. In Mar., 1854, England and France, having already dispatched fleets to the Black Sea, declared war on Russia; Sardinia followed suit in Jan., 1855. Austria remained neutral, but by threatening to enter the war on the Ottoman side forced Russia to evacuate Moldavia and Walachia, which were occupied (Aug., 1854) by Austrian troops. In Sept., 1854, allied troops landed in the Crimea, with the object of capturing Sevastopol . The Russian fortress, defended by Totleben , resisted heroically until Sept., 1855. Allied commanders were Lord Raglan for the British and Marshal Saint‐Arnaud, succeeded later by Marshal Canrobert, for the French. Military operations, which were marked on both sides by great stubbornness, gallantry, and disregard for casualties, remained localized. Famous episodes were the battles of Balaklava and Inkerman (1854) and the allied capture (1855) of Malakhov and Redan, which preceded the fall of Sevastopol. On the Asian front the Russians gained advantages and occupied Kars. The accession (1855) of Czar Alexander II and the capture of Sevastopol led to peace negotiations that resulted (Feb., 1856) in the Treaty of Paris (see Paris, Congress of ). The Crimean War ended the dominant role of Russia in SE Europe; the cooling of Austro‐Russian relations was an important factor in subsequent European history. The scandalous treatment of the troops, particularly the wounded, depicted by war correspondents, prompted the work of Florence Nightingale which was perhaps the most positive result of the war. o Eastern Questoin: Term designating the problem of European territory controlled by the decaying Ottoman Empire in the 18th, 19th, and early 20th cent. The Turkish threat to Europe was checked by the Hapsburgs in the 16th cent., but the Ottoman Turks still controlled the Balkan Peninsula. With the Treaty of Karlowitz (1699), the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire began, and Russia started to push toward the Black Sea. In the 18th cent., France supported the Turks against Russia and Austria. The Eastern Question came into sharp focus during the reign of Czarina Catherine II with the first two of the Russo‐Turkish Wars (1768‐74, 1787‐92), when Russia, in alliance with Austria, planned the partition of the Ottoman Empire. Constantinople was the chief prize coveted by Russia, which lacked an adequate warm‐water outlet to the sea. These designs aroused alarm in Prussia and, more especially, in Great Britain, which saw its dominance in the Mediterranean threatened by Russian ambitions. (Later it was the strategic importance of the Suez Canal that most concerned Britain.) The formation of a diplomatic alliance by Great Britain, Prussia, and the Netherlands and the Austrian defeats at the hands of the Turks offset Russian successes; yet the first stage of the struggle, terminating with the Treaty of Jassy (1792), left Russia with a foothold on the north shore of the Black Sea. During the Napoleonic era, when attention shifted elsewhere, Russia, after another war with Turkey, again secured favorable terms in the Treaty of Bucharest (1812). Russian conquests against Persia and in the Caucasus were confirmed in the treaties of Gulistan (1813) and Turkmanchai (1828). These developments and the outbreak of national aspirations among the oppressed peoples of the Balkans again made the Eastern Question a major European problem. The Holy Alliance was committed to defending the territorial integrity of Turkey, but the rival imperialistic interests of the Great Powers, each of which hoped to profit from Ottoman disintegration, soon caused the abandonment of this principle. In the Greek War of Independence (1821‐30), both England and Russia assisted the Greek insurgents, each trying to impose its influence on the newly formed state. The Russo‐Turkish War of 1828‐29, connected with the Greek war, ended successfully for Russia (see Adrianople, Treaty of ), but the subsequent Russian assistance to Turkey against Muhammad Ali of Egypt, followed by a Russo‐Turkish alliance (1833), greatly disquieted Britain and France. Still, the five Great Powers (Britain, France, Russia, Austria, and Prussia) acted in concert in the final settlement of the Egyptian question, and a treaty signed (1840) in London offered international guarantees of the Ottoman Empireʹs integrity. In 1853, however, rivalry among Britain, France, and Russia brought on the Crimean War . The treaty that ended it (see Paris, Congress of ) attempted to deprive Russia of pretexts for intervention, to check Russiaʹs naval power on the Black Sea, and to place the empire under international protection. By this time, Turkey had become the “sick man of Europe,” and its disintegration could not be arrested. Events in Bosnia and Hercegovina once more led to a Russo‐Turkish War (1877‐78); the Treaty of San Stefano was so favorable to Russia that Britain went to the verge of war to compel a revision. The Congress of Berlin (see Berlin, Congress of ) revised the Treaty of San Stefanoa setback for Russian influencebut it created fresh problems. The new Balkan states, dissatisfied with their borders, turned to individual great powers to back their claims. Austria, allied with Russia in the late 18th cent., had come to fear Russian influence in the Balkans; after its defeat by Prussia in 1866, it had joined in an alliance with Germany (see Triple Alliance and Triple Entente ). Germany, which had assumed the role of “honest broker” at the Congress of Berlin, became increasingly interested in extending its influence over the Ottoman Empire. The German‐Austrian Drang nach Osten [drive to the East] policy became manifest in the reorganization of the Turkish army by German officers, the construction of Baghdad Railway , the crisis over Morocco , and the Austrian annexation (1908) of Bosnia and Hercegovina. Russian Pan‐Slavism in the Balkans and the almost total disappearance of European Turkey in the Balkan Wars caused Turkey to seek German and Austrian support and to join the Central Powers after the outbreak of World War I . The war destroyed the Ottoman Empire and closed the old Eastern Question, but the problem of maintaining stability in the area once ruled by the empire remained. o Serfdom abolished in 1861 and collective ownership of land made the order of the day. Local assemblies known as zemstvos were established. Legal system reformed and codified. o Industrialization: railroad construction stimulated the economy and inspired nationalism and imperialism. o Assassination of Alexander II in 1881 brought political reforms to a screeching halt. o Economic reform was carried out by the minister of Finance from 1892‐1903 Sergei Witte: more raliraods (trans‐Siberian line), protective tariffs, foreign idelas and money were used to build factories and create modern steel, coal and petroleum industries. o Revolution of 1905: Imperialist ambitions brought defeat at the hands of Japan. Huge embarrassment, losing the Russo‐Japanese war over Manchurian/N.Korean claims was a huge folly in Russia. o Nationalism emerged in the Ukraine and amongst the empires numerous minorities. o “Bloody Sunday” massacre when the tsar’s troops fired on a crowd of protesting workers. By this time strikes, uprisings and revolts were sweeping the nation. o Nicholas (Romanov) II had no choice to but to issue the October Manifesto which granted full civil liberties and promised a popularly elected (albeit powerless) legislature known as the Duma. o The Duma was later dismissed to help the Gov’t quell uprisings and survive as a monarchy. o Russia had set the stage for Marxism which was gaining momentum and sweeping across Europe. It had grown steadily since 1871. o First International, the first united internation socialist organization. Had massive psychological impacts on the rest of Europe. o Movement stalled as conditions for workers improved. o Socialism revived to include conditions where a state could be established (Social Welfare State) within the confines of Capitalism. Socialism and its language were toned down to include a more “friendly version”. o Socialism particularly explosive when combined with Nationalism.