Download 10/06

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gartons Agricultural Plant Breeders wikipedia , lookup

Fossils of the Burgess Shale wikipedia , lookup

Plant defense against herbivory wikipedia , lookup

Plant breeding wikipedia , lookup

Herbivore wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Principles of Paleoecological
Reconstruction
Can not observe past ecosystems
directly
• The biotic and abiotic
aspects are inferred
– from fossils and
sedimentary context in
which the fossils were
found.
• Limited to study of
organisms whose
fossils are preserved.
Uniformitarianism
• Present is the key to the past
Key assumptions of Uniformitarianism
• Assume know environmental parameters
controlling present-day distribution of plants and
animals
– (e.g. Temperature, precipitation, growing
season, food resources, etc.)
• Present day plant/animal distributions are in
equilibrium with controlling processes and former
distributions were also in equilibrium.
Uniformitarianism (continued)
• Former plant/animal distributions have
analogues in the modern flora/fauna.
• Ecological affinities of plants/animals have
not changed through time.
Uniformitarianism (continued)
• The fossil assemblage is representative of
the death assemblage, and has not been
biased by differential destruction or by
contamination with older/younger material.
• Taphonomy (origin) of the fossils can be
established.
Uniformitarianism (continued)
• Fossils can be identified to a sufficiently
low taxonomic level to enable
uniformitarian principles to be applied.
Plant Macrofossils
E.S.E.M of Scirpus cf. americanus from Browns Island, S.F. Bay
Macrofossils
• Describes any potentially identifiable fossil
preserved in sediments
– Seen by naked eye
– binocular 'scope
– mm to m
• Includes plants and animal remains
Plant Macrofossils
• Any part of plant
– Typically fruits and seeds
– But include: stamens, leaves, megaspores, buds,
cuticle fragments, and rarely flowers.
Birks, 1980
Blytt-Sernander Scheme
Lowe and Walker, 1984
Advantages of Plant Macrofossils
• Frequently determinable
to species level
– Precise ecological
inferences
• e.g. “Pine pollen Problem”
• Diversity of species each
with different requirements
Osgood Swamp
Adams, 1967
Edlund, nd
Advantages of Plant Macrofossils
(continued)
• Local origin
– Peats
• Local community
– Lake sediments
• Aquatic and lake margin
Advantages of Plant Macrofossils
(continued)
• Identifiable remains of plants that produce• little pollen
– e.g Dryas octopetala
• fragile pollen
– e.g. Najas flexilis
• No distinctive microfossils
– e.g. mosses and charophyte algae
Disadvantages
• Unsuitable for reconstructing regional
vegetation
– Not effectively mixed over a large area
• Produced in small quantities
• Difficult to assess influx
Picea
Jackson et al., 1997
Jackson et al., 1997
Packrat Middens
Joshua Tree, CA
“Avidly acquisitive and prodigiously excretory”
Cole, 1983
Oak Chaparral
Maurice J. Kaurmann
Ponderosa forest
John Crossley