Download Predation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Herbivore wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
4/8/13 Predator–Prey
Relationships and
Management
Chapter 13
Chapter Objectives
—  Introduction
—  Predators
—  Predator Behavior
—  Habitat Interactions
—  Predator-Prey Relationships in Theory
—  Assessing Predation Rates
—  Predator Control
—  Population Limitation, Regulation, and Trophic Cascades
—  Summary
1 4/8/13 Predators
—  Many animals are opportunistic predators
—  We will focus on mammals in the Order Carnivora
and for birds, the raptors
—  Also will include all snakes and lizards
—  Historically, predators considered to limit game
species
—  Predator control was common
Predators
—  Little work on science of predators before 1930s
—  Leopold began working on density-dependent and
density-independent factors in population dynamics
—  Main components:
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
Density of prey
Density of predators
Predator food preference
Physical condition of prey
Abundance of alternative prey
2 4/8/13 Predators
—  Errington suggested that predation only limited
prey when prey populations were above K
—  Theory of compensatory and additive mortality
—  Predation can occur at high rates with little effect on
subsequent breeding population of prey
—  Early work on predator-prey relationships found
that demographic information was critical to
understanding
Predators
—  Most work historically has focused on the influence
of predators on game species, species of concern,
economics, or depredation
—  Recent work has taken an ecosystem approach
—  Predation is difficult and expensive to study
—  Studies of prey remains and diet only show what
was successfully captured
—  Success and failure rates difficult to gather
3 4/8/13 Predator Behavior
—  Territorial behavior by predators can keep
population size below what prey can support
—  Strongly defined boundaries for territories yearround for mammals
—  Only during breeding season in raptors
—  Interspecific competition among predators can
reduce foraging success of individuals
Predator Behavior
—  Prey Selection
—  For birds, mostly sight and sound
—  For mammals, mostly sight and smell
—  Pit vipers use infrared and bats use echo location
4 4/8/13 Predator Behavior
—  Prey capture types
—  Ambush predator
—  Pursuit predator
—  Systematic search predator
—  Most predators are solitary when hunting
—  Social predators include wolves and Harris’ Hawks
Predator Behavior
—  Prey use is influenced by:
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
Presence of alternate prey
Size of prey populations
Age-specific vulnerability
Sex-specific vulnerability
Specializations of the predator
Environmental conditions
—  Competitive exclusion can be a factor
—  Coyotes killing swift foxes and northern goshawks
killing Cooper’s hawks
5 4/8/13 Predator Behavior
—  Generalist predators
—  Most predators are generalists
—  Capture wide variety of prey
—  Generally take prey in relation to availability, not
abundance
—  Prey switching occurs relative to availability
—  Specialist predators
—  Could not persist without main prey
—  Black-footed ferret – prairie dog; lynx – snowshoe
hare; snail kite - snail
Predator Behavior
—  Prey vulnerability impacts prey selection and
predator success
—  Factors include age, sex, physical condition,
environmental condition, activity, group size
—  Management efforts can have unintended effects
when attempting to increase prey populations
6 4/8/13 Habitat Interactions
—  Habitat changes can lead to increased impacts of
predation on prey
—  Loss of refuges and escape terrain
—  Human impacts such as fire suppression can cause
changes in successional stages
—  Drought can concentrate animals at water
—  Management practices can increase predation
Predator-Prey
Relationships in Theory
—  Lotka-Voltera predator-prey models
—  Model assumptions
—  Prey populations experience exponential or logistic
growth
—  Predation rate is influenced by the functional and
numerical response of the predator
—  Functional response is the changing rate at which prey
are removed as prey density changes
—  Numerical response is change in predator density due
to prey availability
7 4/8/13 Predator-Prey
Relationships in Theory
Predator-Prey
Relationships in Theory
—  Functional response types
—  Type I – Number of prey consumed by predators
increase linearly as prey populations increase, up to
the point of limitations of handing and digestion
—  Type II – Incorporates restraints such that the number
of prey consumed reaches a threshold as prey
densities increase
—  Type III – Low predation rates occur when prey
population is low, but rates increase exponentially
when prey populations reach threshold density
8 4/8/13 Assessing Predation Rates
—  Very difficult to assess predation rates because of
predator mobility and secretiveness
—  Can use radio-tagged predators and prey
—  For prey, monitor survival and identify sources of
mortality
—  Radios can impact predation vulnerability
—  Raptor diets analysis biased to nesting time
Assessing Predation Rates
—  Limited ability to assign predator to specific kills
—  Possible for cougars and wolves
—  More difficult for raptor kills
—  Video monitoring now used for raptor nests,
starting to be used for ungulate collars
—  Direct observations of raptors also used in open
areas
9 4/8/13 Assessing Predation Rates
—  Predation rates also modeled using daily food
requirements, biomass of prey, and proportion of
prey in diet
—  Must consider portion of prey not consumed
—  Portion not consumed is highly variable
—  Daily food requirement is highly variable
Predator Control
—  Very controversial
—  Originally undertaken to reduce livestock losses
—  Commonplace in 19th century to allow increases in
game populations
—  Mostly used today to benefit threatened or
endangered species; still used to benefit game
—  Lethal and nonlethal means exist today
10 4/8/13 Predator Control
—  What are objectives? What is best strategy to
achieve objectives?
—  Difficult to reliably predict outcome of predator
control on game populations
—  Dynamic systems with varying interactions
—  Many practical factors also, such as time and money
Predator Control
—  Need to establish criteria if predator control to be
used
—  Do predators kill substantial numbers that would
otherwise survive?
—  Will reduced predation facilitate reliably higher
abundances or harvests of prey?
—  Given less predation, can habitats support more prey?
—  Predators will exist in and out of control area
—  If population is near K, predator control will have
little effect
11 4/8/13 Predator Control
—  Predator control can have positive impact on prey
population
—  Survival of neonates
—  For continued impact, predator control must
continue
—  Unintended consequences include increases in
undesirable small mammal populations
—  Rodents preying upon waterfowl eggs, loss of
riparian vegetation, overgrazing by ungulates
Predator Control
—  Predatory birds usually controlled by nonlethal
means
—  Sometimes conflicts between 2 species of special
concern
—  Translocation being used as nonlethal control
—  Hard vs soft release
—  Decreased survival of translocated animals
—  Many areas are at K for predators
12 4/8/13 Population Limitation, Regulation,
and Trophic Cascades
—  Do predators limit or regulate prey populations?
—  Multiple hypotheses exist
— 
— 
— 
— 
Recurrent fluctuations
Low-density equilibria
Multiple stable states
Stable-limit cycles
—  It is difficult to sort these out as the effect of humans
has greatly altered natural systems
Population Limitation, Regulation,
and Trophic Cascades
—  Well-designed studies needed to evaluate the
impacts of predator control
—  The important measure is how the prey population
responds demographically
—  Must know which animals would have died
anyway when looking at predation before and after
predator control
13 4/8/13 Population Limitation, Regulation,
and Trophic Cascades
—  Trophic structure and energy flow
—  Predators eat lower level consumers – do they
influence conditions at the producer level?
—  Experiments have shown that removal of predators
can have serious effects on lower levels
—  Top-down interactions known as trophic cascade
—  Now being studied via reintroduction of wolf in
Yellowstone
Summary
—  Predator control will remain controversial
—  Historically, predator control was thought as linear
increase in game species
—  Now understand predation as an important part of a
community
—  Modeling has helped us understand predator-prey
dynamics
—  Predation can limit and regulate prey
—  Further study is needed to identify demographic effects
on prey from predators and their control
14