Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
EXTENDED PROJECT QUALIFICATION [2014 – 2015] PROJECT SUBMISSION SHEET Student ID Student email Name of Tutor EXTENDED PROJECT QUALIFICATION: Last name First name Student Contact Number Tutor Group Name Due Date I confirm that I have read, understood and followed the guidelines for the EPQ presentation and submission. I understand that if this project is submitted after the due date, it will incur a penalty for lateness unless I have negotiated an extension previously and I have written confirmation of this extension. Please note the written confirmation must be attached to the submission. Declaration of originality: The work contained in this project submission, other than that which has been referenced in the correct manner, is that of the author. I understand that, should this declaration be found to be false, disciplinary action could be taken and the penalty imposed in accordance with the College’s policy and rules. Signature of student_____________________________ Date____________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Proof of submission receipt – Please keep this in a safe place Name of student Student Number Name of teacher Date of Submission Time of Submission College stamp pg. 2 CONTENTS Study Skills Analysis 4 Project Progression Record 7 - 18 Initial Plan and Diary 19 -33 Evaluation of Resources #1 34 Evaluation of Resources #2 35 Evaluation of Resources #3 36 Schedule 37 Mindmap 1 (possible ideas focusing Ancient Greek culture) 38 Mindmap 2 (possible titles for project) 39 Record of Verification of Topic Title #1 40 – 41 Record of Verification of Topic Title #2 42 Record of Verification of Topic Title #3 43 Dissertation Plan 44 – 45 Annotated Dissertation Plan 46 Mid Project Review 47 -48 The Dissertation: “To What Extent Is Classical Greek Mythology Misogynistic?” 49 – 61 Bibliography 62 Presentation 63 Audience Reaction (to presentation) 64 Audience Reaction Questionnaire & Feedback 65 Student Project Evaluation 66 - 67 pg. 3 STUDY SKILLS ANALYSIS Planning Always Usually I make up and stick to study timetables. Stimes I study or conduct research when I’m most alert. I avoid activities which tend to interfere with my planned research/study schedule. I start course/homework assignments well in advance. I would benefit from attending an Yes EPQ time management session. Always I am comfortable using LRC research facilities. I access the online research resources via Moodle. I use index and contents pages of books, journals or other written sources of information. Project Supervisor comments Agreed Actions Never Project Supervisor comments Agreed Actions I timetable definite times and outline specific goals for my research/study time Research Never No Usually Stimes pg. 4 I use the Internet to find my sources of information. I would benefit from attending an Yes EPQ research skills session. Reading Always No Usually Stimes I skim read each chapter before I begin ‘deep’ reading. I summarise reading material in my own words. I am comfortable with my reading ability When reading I distinguish between important and non-important points. I would benefit from attending an Yes EPQ reading skills session. Always I am able to express my thoughts well in writing. I produce academic language in my written pieces of work. Project Supervisor comments Agreed Actions Never Project Supervisor comments Agreed Actions I focus on the main point when reading. Writing Never No Usually Stimes pg. 5 I review my writing for grammatical, spelling and grammatical errors. I produce structured a research reports I keep a bibliography of my research sources. I would benefit from attending an Yes EPQ academic writing skills session. No pg. 6 PROJECT PROGRESSION RECORD Centre Name Westminster Kingsway College Learner name Centre Number 10240 Learner Number 20216507 The topic chosen must allow the learner To be fairly assessed at the standard applicable to the Project level (level 1, 2 or 3). The opportunity to meet comparable demands to those made on other learners working at the same level To meet all of the Learning Outcomes and Assessment Objectives of the Project. Activity The date you started your project Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments This was when I got a working idea of what my project would be about as well as what it would focus on. I revisited my idea three times and made it more specific to come to my final idea. pg. 7 Activity First thoughts about topic and working title Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments The first title that I came up with was "What does the representation of women in Greek mythology say about Ancient Greek society?". At the time, this title was appropriate as I planned to look at Greek mythology and literature and compare them against Ancient Greek society and it gave me a starting point for my project which I was able to make more specific as I went further along with my project. I had to make it more specific as it would have been too wide to explore thoroughly and in detail with a range of viewpoints, opinions and comments in only 5000 words. The topic really appealed to me as I have a fascination with past societies and also with mythologies in addition to having applied for an Ancient history course at university pg. 8 Activity Date If completing the Diploma, N/A Detail Mentor’s initials Comments N/A is topic relevant to Principal Learning? If yes, Does the project complement and develop the themes and topics for learners’ principal learning set out in the relevant line of learning criteria? and/or Does it support progression knowledge, understanding?) learner (skills, and What is the title of the project? This could be phrased as a question, hypothesis or statement. The final title I have settled on is "To what extent is Classical Greek mythology misogynistic?" - I settled on this title as it incorporates elements of my initial and broad idea (the special aspect of how men viewed women in ancient Greece and their place and role in society) as well as allowed me further room to explore misogyny as a contemporary theme and idea. pg. 9 Activity What do you hope to achieve by the time you complete the project? Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments By the end of the project, I hope to have completed a piece of writing, that thoroughly explores ideas and suggestions of misogyny and anti-female attitudes from an ancient society that has had a major influence on modern day politics, democracy and ideas in society. I have aimed to be left with a project that I have been able to learn from whilst writing, in addition to recognising links and themes and maybe even coming a bit closer to understanding the anti-female attitudes present. I would also like the chance to work on my presentational skills, especially where I would be talking confidently about and sharing something that I am both passionate about and have an interest in. I also believe that this piece of writing would be a great piece of material to refer back to when at university and also if I decide to continue with this and possibly make it wider and more inclusive to some of the things I had or cut out for time and convenience. Hope by completing this project I will also gain an insight into the subject of ancient history and provide me with some knowledge that I will be able to take to and utilise in university. pg. 10 Activity What form will the assessment evidence for the project take? (ie design, performance, report with findings from an investigation, artefact, [dissertation – level 3 only] ) Have you produced an outline plan to show your project timeline? Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments I have decided (from the beginning) that the most suitable form for my project and the topic is a dissertation. I have chosen to do this as it will allow me to work on improving my essay writing as well as allowing md to extend my critical discussion, level of analysis, develop the level of my evaluation and would best enable me to contrast different/ a range of viewpoints (and challenging me to create a critical discussion), whilst giving me the chance to experience the process of what planning and writing a. Dissertation at university will probably be like. The plan and diary I have been filling out throughout the course of my project had helped me in keeping focused when I make a record of tasks that I have or would like to complete and I also assign it a date that I aim to get it completed by. Also, it has helped a lot during the times I have taken a break from my project as once I have recorded what needs to be done, I can get back to where I left off. pg. 11 Activity What will you need to achieve your project? eg tools, equipment, techniques and technologies Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments I will need to have access to a number of Microsoft office programmes (or word processing software) to be able to type up and save my planning documents and to type up and edit my dissertation. I will also need access to my phone a lot due to the fact that it has the Evernote app which will allow me to be able to do work on the journeys to and from college without having to take out papers and the larger folder I have dedicated to my project. I am also able to save documents on it in addition to another app called Instapaper so I am able to have virtual access to sources and highlight important or contextual points. The citing and referencing app called RefMe was also very helpful as all I had to do was take a picture of the ISBN, or copy and paste the HTML for a website and it would enter most of the information for me, and automatically put it in the Harvard referencing style whist simultaneously creating an alphabetical bibliography with the sources. This saved me time as I didn't have to do it all manually and worry about getting it wrong, and this gave me more time to focus on my research and writing. Will you or have you used a range of sources for your information? The resources I have used range from the Internet, books, interviews, online articles and journals. Although I did not have any primary resources that I had collected myself, by incorporating my own ideas and interpretations I feel I was able to add something unique and original. pg. 12 Activity Is the information selected suitable and sufficient to fit the question/task/brief? Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments When reading through the resources I had collected I was able to filter out those that had no direct relevance to my project, wasn't that clear or well written and contained things that other resources included in more detail. All the information I have used is clear and has a point of view, perspective or argument that it brings to my dissertation. Have you identified any links with other areas of study or areas of interest which relate to your project? What skills need to be applied to use the information you have collected? Most of the information I have directly links to my title and project focus but whilst researching I noticed links between psychology and mythology and the theories it offered as an explanation. In order to efficiently use the information I had collected I had to use skills such as skim reading (to quickly get an idea of what the main points were and the general conclusion the resource came to). I had to also use skills such as critical thinking and simplifying information. pg. 13 Activity Did you apply the tools, equipment, techniques and technologies to use the information that has been collected to complete your project? Date Mentor’s initials Detail Comments Yes, I have utilised Microsoft Office programmes, like Word and PowerPoint, constantly throughout my project for different purposes including: Word for writing up my dissertation and planning documents. PowerPoint for preparing and delivering the presentation. I have also used the internet as well as both my college and local library for researching, and also RefMe for my referencing and bibliography. What outcomes/objectives have you achieved so far (mid-term review)? I have managed to develop a very interesting project I have managed to identify what methods of working are best for me. I have successfully developed researching skills and improved my ability to compare sources and evaluate provenance. pg. 14 Activity Evaluation of own learning and performance so far (mid-term review). What have you changed after reviewing your work? Final phase - Do you feel that you have achieved all of the outcomes/objectives of your project? Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments I believe that I have worked hard enough to be where I am at the moment and what I am pleased with the research I have collected so far. The independent project has allowed me to improve and develop new skills. However, I know there is room for improvement, especially in regards to my timekeeping. I believe that I need to make sure that I stay in full control of the project by remaining on schedule, so that I don’t leave it all to the last minute where it’ll be harder to finish because of upcoming exams. After reviewing my work, I have changed things such as the title, how specific my project focus is, as well as what documents and resources I have ended up using. The biggest changes I have made were to my dissertation when slightly redrafting, as well as the presentation and what things would be most appropriate to focus on talking about. Although I feel that I have achieved most of my objectives, like improving my research, evaluation and presentational skills, other skills/ objectives like improving my time keeping hasn’t gone as well as I would have liked, but I have noticed developments in the time I take complete tasks. pg. 15 Activity Presentation of Portfolio written section (compulsory, even if the outcome is a performance or artefact) other evidence can be DVD, photographs, slides, CD, artefact, digital technologies etc Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments My Portfolio is a Word Processed Document which contains everything from my initial plan to my research and my final outcomes. The final product of my project is a dissertation also included in this document. I decided to write a dissertation because it was the most appropriate thing form that I could present my findings in, but also and I also believe that I am good at and would like to improve essay writing. pg. 16 Activity Describe how you have presented your project to an audience Date Detail Mentor’s initials Comments I created and practiced my presentation a couple of days before I was supposed to present on a friend to make sure that I have enough time to be prepared and to change anything if necessary. Before giving the practice presentation, I Googled presentation tips which I could implement. Some of the key things I learnt were that I shouldn’t overwhelm the slides with too much information, also that I shouldn’t read word for word and that the slides should visually stimulating to interest the audience and serve as prompts to me. After I had gone through the presentation, I felt more confident about my presentation and how I would present it, especially as I had made flash cards to aid me during the presentation. Presenting my EPQ to my tutor and fellow EPQ students were also there doing theirs was good. I was one of the last to present so I had enough time to pick up on some of the skills that other people applied and learn from some of the things they could have improved on like engaging with the audience and marinating eye contact etc. to make sure that my presentation surpassed theirs. When standing up in front of others, at first I was a bit nervous and used the flash cards but the father on I went into the presentation, I got more confident speaking and no longer needed the flashcards. pg. 17 Activity Date Have you evaluated your project, taking into account any feedback from your audience? Date of project submission to 29/04/15 teacher Detail Mentor’s initials Comments Yes, I have evaluated my presentation using both audience feedback as well as what I personally thought. I also evaluated the project as a whole. Evaluations were helpful to me as it allowed me to reflect on what I did well and what I could improve on the next time around and be sure to implement in other pieces of work. Though the original submission date was the 24th April, I was given extra time to submit my project due to issues with my coursework in film studies that I had to prioritise at the last minute. Notes This form should be used to record the progress of each learner and may also assist in forming a basis and justification for the mark awarded under each assessment criterion (for example, by indicating the level of support needed by the learner). At Level 3 it is not intended that the Mentor gives any written feedback to the learner in the comments section. Verbal feedback may be given by the Mentor; this should not be recorded on this form. Learners may use the comments section for taking notes. A copy of this form must accompany each learner’s work when it is submitted for Moderation. pg. 18 PLAN AND DIARY Task Make a list of areas within Ancient Greek Culture that most interest me. Create a mind map of possible titles for my EPQ Proposed & actual completion date July 2014 Actual completion date: July 2014 July 2014 Actual completion date: July 2014 Proposed actions Outcomes Comments Although I have already decided that I would like to focus on some aspect of Ancient Greece, I need to create a mind map of possible ideas within it, which I could base my extended project on. The task was quite straightforward; simple task of noting down ideas which I came across that would be suitable for this project. What also made this task simple was that I already had some ideas in my head before September and did some research over the summer. Choose from the list of areas and attempt to phrase questions differently and in a way that would best accommodate the objective of my project. I ended up choosing to focus on women in the different areas of mythology, religion, society, and the titles were mostly the same with slight modifications to them. I chose to do something revolving around Ancient Greek society, as in addition to being interested in the culture and tradition, I planned to apply to do an Ancient history course at university and I wanted this project to allow me to learn some more about the topic before I started the course. I chose to focus on women as Greek society was patriarchal and as a result of this women were often in the background, and excluded from the same social spheres as men. Only in mythology are they featured playing an active and arguable important role alongside men; but despite this, men are also at the forefront of mythology, legends and tales shown by the abundance of male heroes. Below the surface women are actually complex and their characters explore identity as a convoluted social phenomenon. Many who have examined Greek mythology, looked the male heroes and explored the messages within the stories, and I feel that women in mythology are almost a part of some uncharted pg. 19 territory. Get some books from the library. August 2014 Actual completion date: Wednesday 3rd September 2014 Meet Mike, EPQ supervisor. Wednesday 24th September 2014 Actual completion date: Wednesday 24th September 2014 Try to utilise what resources are available for free and most accessible before I look for alternatives like purchasing books and other materials, to avoid spending money. Meet with my supervisor Mike for the first time. I plan to show him what planning I have done over the summer and ideas for my project. I was able to get some general books on Greek mythology, as well as one book ‘Understanding Greek Mythology’ that allowed me to explore a number of meanings. I was unable to get any books specific to women in Greek mythology so far. Met with Mike in a small group session. I feel it went well as he asked us what our initial ideas were for our project, and when I told him mine; he seemed really taken with the idea. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to show him what I had done over the summer as I had left my EPQ jottings at home that day. Mike advised we complete the record of verification of topic title sheet and made arrangements for our future meetings (Wednesdays from 12-1pm). Although it was in a group, I thought we all had the opportunity to speak about our projects and to also get ideas from one another. Going to make a list of books using the internet/ Amazon that may be helpful with my research and see if my local library is able to order them. pg. 20 th Complete first draft Verification of Topic Title Meeting document. Friday 10 October 2014 Create a spider diagram outlining the project. Wednesday 22nd October 2014 Actual completion date: Saturday 11th October 2014 Actual completion date: Saturday 18th October 2014 Further research about how female monsters are presented in mythology. Sunday 2nd November 2014 Actual completion date: Monday 3rd November 2014 Complete the Record of Topic Verification sheet and send it to Mike, so he has an updated version of my project, what I aim to investigate and also what ideas I’ve had since the first meeting. I plan to put my ideas, key information and points in a basic mind map. By doing this I hope to record which will give me a clearer idea of where my project is going. It was very useful as I was able to get a clearer sense of what my project would entail by asking myself a number of questions that I aim to answer in my writing. Mike’s maintained his initial view that my project was “going to be awesome”, that I have chosen an excellent topic and also posed some excellent questions. The end result was good as I felt it was helpful and productive due to gaining a much better idea of what I was going to include in my project. It also lessened the amount of things I had had wanted to include and streamlined ideas. The mind map allowed me to focus on one central idea. The non-linear style was useful for figuring out aspects of ideas I had and also allowed me to generate levels of its detail before organising them into a linear essay plan. Research females in the monster Found it quite simple when researching category (cat. 3), Medusa, Charybdis + about Medusa; The internet provided a Scylla and the Sirens. large amount of character and representation analysis of her as well as modern takes on her character. I was unable to find much on Charybdis and Scylla and the sirens except from some general things. I found sorting through my ideas quite challenging as it meant choosing not to focus on some of the things I liked but turned out to not be as relevant; although I later found alternative ways of incorporating them. General documents say presentation of women was based on how men thought of and saw women in Ancient Greece. Myths can resonate with aspects of life and women seen as objects of lust throughout mythology. As I didn’t find much about the others, save Medusa, I am considering whether it is worth still using them dominantly. pg. 21 Organise 2 to 1 meeting with Mike th Saturday 15 November 2014 Actual completion date: Saturday 15th November 2014 Modify Record of Verification of Topic Title Meeting th Tuesday 18 November 2014 Actual completion date: Tuesday 18th November 2014 Group the women/ females. th Wednesday 12 November 2014 Actual completion date: Friday 21st November 2014 Get date of 2 to 1 meeting, as well as Although the meeting was arranged, it contact details of other candidate/ Study never actually happened due to it being Pal. postponed and both my study pal and I didn’t really make much of an effort to attend a meeting after that. After about two sessions, I revisited my plans for the project and I thought that I could make my research more specific to women in mythology, rather than in literature and [Athenian] tragedy too, especially as mythology is the area that really fascinates me. Read through materials and sources of information I have so far and group my list of females in mythology according to their overall perception being either ‘negative’ or ‘positive’ (and maybe ‘undeveloped’). Going through the sheet again was straightforward as I could simply adapt the questions I asked on my previous ones. I also had time to think of some new ones. I also modified the title to make it more specific. Next steps include showing it to Mike directly or emailing him a copy. Took a bit longer than I initially anticipated as there was quite a lot to read through. Whilst grouping them I began both noticing and looking for points where they link and could possibly offer as an evaluation. [Mike helped me by lending me a book about Greek mythology]. Mike said better to have someone else studying for the same qualification who can give friendly feedback on work and share ideas and motivate you, and it would have probably been beneficial if we tried again, in the sense that I would have been able to continue doing work. I chose to make it more specific to focus on just mythology as my initial thoughts were quite broad and narrowing it down would allow me to attempt doing a comparative essay. Also, there were problems with finding objective literature on females in Ancient Greek culture, as when I skimmed through them and noticed women either played a minimal role or were all presented the same in the texts- most of which were written by men, and this would only give me male ideals of women. I also had the idea to maybe group them thematically too: Goddesses/ divinities, Humans (Queens/Princesses), and monsters. I decided to group them like this as the categories have also been noticed by others who have commented on women in Greek myths. pg. 22 Research theories that can be applied to mythology. Monday 20th October 2014 Actual completion date: Sunday 23rd November 2014 Use the internet to research theories that can be applied to mythology, and think of a way to implement them in my work. Using ‘Wikiversity’,I was able to learn a lot about mythical theories including Euhemerism/ Historicism, Etiology/ Nature allegory, Freudian psychology, Jungian psychology, Character myth, Ritualist School and Structuralism. Out of these I feel I will be able to better incorporate Freudian psychology directly to the myths containing females, whereas the others are more suitable for introducing the topic of myth. Although I am aware that it is questionable whether the information on Wikipedia is accurate due to the fact that the site accepts content submitted by anyone (after going through their verification process) and is a bad source for research projects, but as it acted as my staring point, and as it is a tertiary level source, it provided good background knowledge. As well as offering a general idea on my topic, I was also able to refer to the references section and use those secondary sources as citations. I chose to focus a bit more on learning something about Freudian psychology when applied to myths as I noticed a link when researching Medusa and the sirens. I thought this would be most appropriate to include especially as the other theories were great to read but didn’t have as much of a strong link to the females in mythology I have chosen to focus on. pg. 23 Continue research into Medusa (category 3) Monday 23rd November 2014 Actual completion date: Monday 23rd November 2014 Meet with supervisor Monday 24th November 2014 Actual completion date: Monday 24th November 2014 Start research into the Goddess, Eris (category 1) Wednesday 24th December 2014 Actual completion date: Wednesday 24th November 2014 Print off research Saturday 20th December 2014 Actual completion date: Saturday 20th Aim to get at least 5 different pieces of material related to Medusa. I have already done some general research on Medusa when I briefly did some research on the whole of the 3rd category of monsters. Meet with Mike to show him the planning documents I’ve completed so far, and also the updates I’ve made to the Record of Project verification sheet. Going good so far. Have over 5 pieces evaluating her role, appearance, presentation and representation in mythology. This research has already given me a clearer image of what I will be arguing in my writing and is developing my opinion. Going to research systematically, so Monster (cat.3), then Goddess/ Divinity (cat.1) then Mortal (cat.2). That way I get something from all the categories, able to make comparisons throughout as well as in case I don’t have enough time I am still able to compare the 3 different “types” of women represented in mythology. I was told my progress was excellent, it was good that I was making my project more specific, as it would give my project a clearer and more directional focus. Answered the questions I had at the time, and gave us the dates when we were going to give our presentations. Research Eris, the goddess of chaos and There wasn’t as much on her as Medusa, discord. due to her being a sort of minor Goddess- only really featured in the story, The Judgement of Paris. Despite this, she does fit into my project as she is represented mostly negatively, and only the negative side of her is shown. This led to me deciding to reduce the number of women I was going to feature down to 10 as a number of them were also minor goddesses our mentioned very little in mythology. I feel I will do a better job choosing to focus on a select few and briefly mention the others to support my point. Print of all research I have saved on the This was quite straightforward as the Quite off-putting and tiring having to computer. documents were already saved to my constantly look at a computer screen. Evernote and Instapaper accounts. pg. 24 December 2014 Go on college EPQ website and look at recent example of good project. Make a list of women in Greek Mythology th Wednesday 17 December 2014 Actual completion date: Sunday 21st December 2014 Friday 10th October 2014 Actual completion date: 23rd December 2014 Look at recent example of another Notes I took included: candidate’s work from last year who had Broke planning/research into obtained a good grade. Make brief notes sections. on things they did in their project. Was very detailed in the steps they were going to take in their plan and diary. Self-evaluated throughout. I will use the internet to get a list of all the women that are featured in Greek mythology and also hopefully a brief telling of the mythology they are featured in, or what they are most known for in Greek/ Classical mythology. When I used the Google search engine to find more women/ females in Greek mythology outside of those who I am already familiar with (Medusa; Athena; Aphrodite etc.) I came across a lot of names I could use, but I desired to make a strong case for women being presented negatively and bid it against a strong case of them not. This led to me deciding that I would focus on a select few and find an alternative way to incorporate the others. Heard from a friend beforehand that the example was over 100 pages, which kind of shook my confidence a bit, but when I actually looked at it for myself, I saw that they just had a lot of in-depth planning sheets, that was broken up into steps. This was helpful as I was able to see the level of detail that was required to get a top grade and also how to properly evaluate and analyse the project. I found there are a number of essays online which focus on the more popular women including Hera, Athena, Aphrodite - who I am choosing to focus on along with a couple of others, as I think I could do a good job of analysing and evaluating these various sources of information which would give me the opportunity to develop and extend my critical discussion (one of my skills I need to work on). To analyse and evaluate the women, I looked at them against a number of sources. pg. 25 Make list of books that could be useful to research. Saturday 27th December 2014 Actual completion date: Saturday 27th December 2014 Create a table for sources. Friday 27th December 2014 Actual completion date: Friday 27th December 2014 Create a task list of things that need to be done Monday 29th December 2014 Actual completion date: Monday 29th December 2014 Going to make a list of books using the internet/ Amazon that may be helpful with my research and see if my local library is able to order them. Downloaded a booklist that I was able to input the list of books I may like to take a look at, simultaneously to briefly looking at them on Amazon, and what other customers said about them. History teacher mentioned something similar for coursework. Thought it would be helpful to implement in EPQ research stages. I’ll start a sources table where I will note down where I got my resources and how I used them. Also came cross a referencing site that makes citing and doing a bibliography less complicated. I also created a sources table on Word and will form now on note down all the resources that I use on there, as feel it will save time when I come to evaluating the sources. Make a sort of step-by-step task list that I can follow, which should help when I get stuck. Research as a whole was quite daunting, especially with the number of sources and materials I found, and at times it was hard knowing where to jump back in. Making the list helped to break down the research I needed to do into sections which enabled me to research further into the categories I grouped the women into and focus on a specific female. Found a really useful website that featured an annotated catalogue that was solely for mythology, and some the women in Classical Mythology. I chose to still use it even though it was targeted towards undergraduate students- may contain some really useful analyses and arguments. The referencing site (Refme.com) was very helpful as it automatically created an alphabetical bibliography of all the sources websites, books etc. that I used as also entered them in the Harvard referencing style that I initially struggled with. The sources table, whilst useful; I didn’t end up using it as it would remove some of the context to the sources and I felt more comfortable highlighting and referring back to the source. Really helped, especially when I was stuck after I completed most of my planning documents. Also helped in knowing what I needed to do (even if I had difficulty sticking to schedule) and the steps I needed to take to get there. Also, so when I go back to college, I can continue with where I left off. pg. 26 Attend research workshop th Thursday 15 January 2015 Actual completion date: Thursday 15th January 2015 Meet with Mike, (before Mid Project review) Monday 5th or Wednesday 7th January 2015 Actual completion date: Thursday 26th January 2015 Attend the workshop being specifically for EPQ research. held I found this very useful as I was able to make a list of the things I could do to enhance my project. This included: To establish and define the key words in my title. Make a list of research articles from Google Scholar. Make a checklist of what needs to be completed for the midterm review. Talk to him about concerns with my project that I came across during the holidays. My main concerns included: Structuring my project The style of writing which would better compliment project. Beginning the dissertation He gave me some good advice like not trying to start with the introduction, but to start writing sections as I would be able to fit it together later and see what flows better, which would enable me to start writing- even if it isn’t at the beginning. Also, during the discussion with him, I mentioned that I wanted to look at both sides of the argument so I was encouraged to replicate a discussion in my writing. Attending this was good as it gave me ample time to prepare for my midterm review by completing: Initial plan and diary Record of verification sheet Schedule Evaluation of 1 resource Evidence of research. Also, I was able to see the importance of identifying the key words in my title and the focus of my project as it made the research I conducted more constructive and provided me with a lot more usable resources. Replicating a discussion worked well as it gave me the opportunity to give my own point of view and comment on some of the viewpoints people have given for myths both being and not being misogynistic. pg. 27 Attend Mid Project Review. th Wednesday 4 February 2015 Actual completion date: Monday 16th February 2015 Do/ continue research on the chosen females 25th December 2014 Actual completion date: 16th March 2015 Start a draft of the dissertation. 05th January 2015 Actual completion date: 17th March 2015 Attend mid-term review with the I wasn’t able to see Mike for the following: scheduled date as I was on a trip to Initial plan and diary Brussels with my history class, so I Record of verification sheet contacted him and arranged to Schedule reschedule to the 16th. I was able to ask Evaluation of 1 resource him all the questions I had and he gave Evidence of research. me clear answers which were very helpful, such as possible structures that I may decide follow. I have done some research on Medusa and the Amazons, so I am going to focus on researching the rest of the females in the third category of monsters, which include Scylla, Charybdis and the Sirens (who appear in Homer’s “The Odyssey”) The research for Scylla was okay but I found two different Scylla’s in Greek mythology (or maybe they are the same?) which was quite confusing for me. One was a great example but didn’t fit in the category as she was mortal. I wasn’t able to find much on the other Scylla, Charybdis and the Sirens that was worth putting in as a main feature. Start and finish a first thorough draft of It was really difficult to put together at my dissertation, including the first and once I reached half of my word introduction, main body and conclusion. count I panicked as I thought that I wouldn’t have enough space to explore all the points and interpretations I wanted to. Although one of the Scylla’s won’t be featured dominantly, I feel that I will still be able to briefly refer to her in the themes section of my essay as she is a pretty good example of how love can be a weakness in myth. I chose to just feature Medusa exclusively after this as due to the lack of information on them, and although the sirens also link back to Freudian psychology, I think I am better off briefly referring to them too. Once I continued writing, I was able to see that I overreacted and I probably would have enough space. The Amazons took up a lot of space but I realised that I would have to focus on them a bit more as I would have to dispel some of the myths commonly held about them. pg. 28 Start research into Helen of Troy (category 2) Start, redraft and practice Presentation + create a feedback questionnaire. Actual completion date: Monday 23rd March 2015 Monday 23th March 2015 Actual completion date: Tuesday 24th March 2015 I was able to find a number of Helen of Troy is one of the females that I interesting views regarding Helen of am including mainly, so I am going to do Troy that showed her in a different light some research specific to her. to what was thought initially. I discovered that in some tellings of the myths she is the victim who was kidnapped by Paris, whereas in others she runs off with him willingly, leaving her kids behind. I didn’t even know she had kids until then, and the research I did also shed some light on what took place after the Trojan War. I would like to start the presentation around now so it will be ready for my Being able to practice my presentation presentation date. I plan to also start on a friend was good as was I was able practicing my presentation, in front of to get opinions about what changes I people if possible. I also need to create a may need to make. Starting it early feedback questionnaire on my ensured I had an ample amount of time presentation that people can fill out at to make these corrections as well as the end of my official presentation. By prepare myself for the presentation by getting the audience to fill these out, it making flashcards. will simplify the process of identifying what presentational skills I could improve on. There were some original and avantgarde ideas and interoperations which I wish to explore further in my dissertation. I think they will make an thought-provoking debate. I Googled presentation tips which I could implement. Some of the key things I learnt were that I shouldn’t overwhelm the slides with too much information, also that I shouldn’t read word for word and that the slides should visually stimulating to interest the audience and serve as prompts to me. pg. 29 Give presentation. th Thursday 26 March 2015 Actual completion date: Thursday 26th March 2015 Write up an Audience Reaction Sheet. Actual completion date: 30th March 2015 I was one of the last to present so I had Give the presentation to other students enough time to pick up on some of the doing the EPQ. skills that other people applied and learn from some of the things they could have improved on like engaging with the audience and maintaining eye contact etc. At first, I was a bit nervous so was more reliant on the flashcards but as I grew more confident presenting, I didn’t use them. Write up an Audience Reaction Sheet Most of the feedback I got was great based on the feedback I got from my and they liked the information about presentation. women on the slide as it supported my point of view, but one thing I noticed that people commented on was both the lack of visuals as well as wanting there to be more contextual information on the women I have chosen to focus on. This was a good experience for me to develop my presentational skills as well as pick up some other skills that my peers used whilst doing their own presentations. I know that in the future I will be expected to give both group & independent presentations, and I believe this experience will help me directly in university as I will be able to look back and draw from the improvements I identified. From the feedback that I collected, the audience commented that they were able to see I had a genuine level of interest in the way I communicated my project to them, especially once I had overcome my pre-presenting nerves. A big thing that I will take from this experience is to make my presentation slides more visually stimulating as well as providing a bit more contextual information about the focus of my project, as these will benefit both the audience as the images will reinforce my words, as well as me in the sense that they could substitute using flash cards by becoming visual prompts. pg. 30 Create a detailed plan of my EPQ. January 2015 Actual completion date: 31st March 2015 Evaluate Resources. 05th April 2014 Actual completion date: 8th April 2015 Decided that I would create and finalise a detailed plan of my project. I believe that the reason for me being unable to start writing and move past the researching stage was because I didn’t have a plan where I was able to visualise and annotate what I was looking at and the structure/ stages I would go through. This helped a lot as I found a structure that worked best for me. I was able to see where certain points of the essay linked together, what points would best fit where, and what flowed better after the previous section. The steps also helped me quickly look for places that could be reduced or simply removed, and where best to implement my primary and secondary research points. Need to create evaluate my resources so This was straightforward once I had that I can show how useful/valid/reliable identified what sources I was actually etc. they are. going to use (as some of the same information was in a number of other sources). Once the outline and detailed plan was out of the way, I was able to start the actual writing. This was a good thing as I didn’t have much more time to procrastinate, and could begin immediately. I eliminated similar sources according to how much information they contained. If they had something similar to another source then I looked at what other information it had or what else it said, and if I thought it was significant or beneficial to my project, then I kept it in. If not, then I didn’t bother using it as a source. pg. 31 Limit down to a total of 7 (actually 6) females. Wednesday 8th April 2015 Actual completion date: Wednesday 8th April 2015 Put all work into one document Tuesday 21st April 2015 Actual completion date: Tuesday 21st April 2015 I will cut out some of the females so I am not using them all as main sections/ focuses in my project. This reduction means that I am ultimately looking at fewer females, but carries implications of not being able to explore the themes as comprehensively as I had initially planned to. As a result of this reduction in females, I was able to reduce my focus and get more done. I also decided to look at Aphrodite and Hera together as they provide a nice comparison to each other- representing the two side of love, which I feel would be interesting to explore. Although the quality of my word didn’t decrease, it wasn’t as expansive as I wanted due to having to cut out one of the really complex characters I had collected a lot of information on, who, like the Amazons, provided a brilliant contrast to the traditional Greek patriarchal attitudes. This really helped me as I thought I was running out of words and I also didn’t have enough time to explore Medea in as much detail as I wanted due to her also being a very complex character in Greek mythology. I believe my time was limited mainly due to the fact that I hadn’t worked out all the kinks in my project. Although I had done ample research, I was unable to see how they linked to each other (despite the focus) in a way that would facilitate a discussion. Put all the separate documents, like the evaluation of resources, EPQ schedule, Project Progression Record etc. all into one document. This was helpful for keeping track of my project as a whole as well as easier to locate the updated versions of the documents. Will also be easier to send as an attachment for submission. Compiling all the work and planning documents signified that I was coming close to the end of the project and whilst I continued to work I should also start looking to make corrections and check for spelling and grammar mistakes. pg. 32 See philosophy teacher Actual completion date: Monday 20th April 2015 Ask him how I would go about improving my critical analysis and discussion. Once I am able to know how to do this, I should be able to take the steps to implement it. From a discussion about my work in class, he advised that I provide the arguments/ reasons for a person adopting or having their point of view. Also, that I should do more than just juxtapose different points of view, but look to be more analytical when looking at them. I chose to see my philosophy teacher (instead of solely relying on online materials for guidance) as he has taught me for almost 2 years and he is in a better position to give me advice and tell me what specifically to work on due to already being familiar with my writing style and ability. I felt that the talk was very helpful as I am able to apply what I was told not just in my EPQ writing, but also in other subjects too. Read up on how to write a dissertation. Monday 5th January 2015 Make notes so that I am prepared, and Most of the information I read about able to start putting the pieces of my dissertations was not as helpful as I project together, and begin writing. would have liked as they referred me to university websites which mostly focused on things in the stages before writing the dissertation such as finding a suitable idea, making a suitable proposal to get approved and having arguments and points of view from all sides. I was looking for something that would suggest a vague structure that I would be able to adapt to fit my idea as opposed to how to approach a dissertation from scratch. However, once I created my own very detailed plan, I was able to begin writing. Actual completion date: 22nd April 2015 Re-draft the dissertation. 22nd April 2015 Actual completion date: Go through the dissertation and make Being able to do this meant I was able to necessary corrections, additions and make revisions as well as any additions I modifications. felt were necessary. It was also a great chance to fix the spelling and grammar mistakes made in the first draft that I had overlooked. I also noticed a mistake in the style of referencing I had used but I decided to stick with it. I had initially underestimated how long it would take me to start writing, which did have a slight impact on the quality of my writing although I was able to go back and improve it at this stage. I chose to stick with the MHRA style referencing instead of changing it to the Harvard style as MHRA is used in the Humanities, so there’s a chance that I may be using this pg. 33 referencing style at university. pg. 34 EVALUATING MY RESOURCES #1 Resource Used Date The Greek Myths: The Complete and Definitive Edition (book) By Robert Graves 08th April 2015 Brief description of the Resource This book compiled all the famous myths and those which featured some females including the labours of Hercules, the voyage of the Argonauts, Theseus and the Minotaur, the Trojan War and Odysseus’ journey home. What was I trying to find out? The role of women in these myths. How the women I have chosen to focus on can be interpreted. Graves’ evaluation for the women in Greek myth. How Graves shows how religious developments are related to matriarchal and patriarch social organization and religious beliefs as well as how he explores the roots of the sense of our gender and sexuality. How do I know this resource was appropriate? Robert Graves was both a novelist and a classicist (amongst a number of other things) and he has written many books with a focus on the classical world. Also, some of his books are valued in the field of academia and his use of material from classical sources has been contentious to scholars for many years. He references and comments on a wide range of scholarly sources, though he does not always reference the source for each myth, the footnotes included are really helpful and he includes his own interpretations. This resource summarises the myth, looks at them against their alternate versions and, in a sense, evaluated them which was appropriate as it included the myths I have chosen to focus on in my project. Also, it is comprehensive and is very easy to use, so ideal for the first time reader as well as the scholar and expert as it can be read as a single, continuous narrative, accompanied by full commentaries, crossreferences, interpretations, variants and explanations, as well as a comprehensive index of names. What are the key things I have learned from this resource? I was able to learn more about the myths that I plan to focus on in my dissertation, as well as some contextual information about the 6 women, in addition to both their classical and modern interpretations. Is this resource linked to any other resources I have used? If yes, how? Graves’ book can be looked at against another book, Understand Greek Mythology: Teach Yourself by Steve Eddy and Claire Hamilton, which similarly compiles the Greek myths and offers modern and new interpretations. pg. 35 EVALUATING MY RESOURCES #2 Resource Used Date The Amazons: Lives and Legends of Warrior Women Across the Ancient World (book) By Adrienne Mayor 21st March 2015 Brief description of the Resource A book focusing on the legendary Amazons, female warriors of the Ancient and Classical world. It explores who they are their existence and presents them in a way they haven’t been seen before. This is the first comprehensive account of warrior women in myth and history across the ancient world Mayor tells how amazing new archaeological discoveries of battle-scarred female skeletons buried with their weapons prove that women warriors were not merely figments of the Greek imagination. She reveals intimate, surprising details and original insights about the lives and legends of the women known as Amazons and provocatively argues that a timeless search for a balance between the sexes explains the allure of the Amazons, Mayor reminds us that there were as many Amazon love stories as there were war stories. The Greeks were not the only people enchanted by Amazon. What was I trying to find out? More information about the Amazons, including their portrayal and representation in both classical Greek Myths and ancient Greek society. If there was any truth to some of the popular misconceptions (e.g. only having one breast) Reasons for these misconceptions More about their general lifestyle, culture, traditions and societal norms. How do I know this resource was appropriate? Mayor is a full time scholar and researcher at Stanford and she studies folklore, myth and science of the ancient world. As she has worked on this book for decades, it implies that she has done a lot of research into a field she is already quite knowledgeable and familiar in. Mayor is highly readable and her work is accessible to the non-academics even though she writes in a scholarly way. She carefully balances history against myth which gives a modern and avant-garde account of the female warriors. Also, part of the book describes and comments on the myths and he historical material. What are the key things I have learned from this resource? The Amazons did not practice and embrace mastectomies as a part of their tradition (this was made up by a fifth century historian), but instead wore tight leather structures, like bras, to reduce breast movement when riding. They weren’t as barbaric as they were accused of being. They enjoyed equality with men and also had great sexual freedom. The Amazons fascinated the culture (Greece) that shunned them and kept their women in a state of subordination, which is where most of the misconceptions about the Amazons we have today originate from. Is this resource linked to any other resources I have used? If yes, how? This resource is directly linked to two other resources, an article and a journal which feature samples of interviews with Mayor. This linked together very nicely as when she explains a process or some piece of pg. 36 information featured in her book I was able to refer back directly to her work. EVALUATING MY RESOURCES #3 Resource Used Date: The Goddess Athena: Feminist or Misogynist (Article) URL: http://www.mythphile.com/2010/10/the-goddess-athena-feminist-ormisogynist/ By Ellen Brundige Saturday 21st March 2015 Brief description of the Resource This was a web article that looked at the representation and presentation of Athena in Greek mythology, and citing this, and her relationships with others, weighed up whether Athena as a feministas portrayed as a string woman in a powerful position or if she was a misogynist- adopting anti-female attitude and siding in favour of and supporting the matriarchal rule of Greek society. What was I trying to find out? Initially, I was trying to find out more about how Athena was portrayed, and what she represented in Greek myths. How do I know this resource was appropriate? This resource links directly to the title of my investigation and it is unique in the sense that this is the only source to do so. Also, this resource isn’t just purely someone else’s opinion but includes others like academics, such as Christine Downing (who is a scholar of religion, mythology, depth psychology and feminist studies), as well as using evidence from literature to support and further this discussion. What are the key things I have learned from this resource? One of the key things that I have learned and will cite in my dissertation is that the (lack of) female relationships Athena has throughout mythology can be seen from both a feminist and misogynist point of view and these provide different interpretations, implications and their own significance to the perspective. Is this resource linked to any other resources I have used? If yes, how? This resource links to another resource I have used which is about Medusa’s representation and her portrayal but similarly notes the complexities of her character. pg. 37 SCHEDULE Stage of the EPQ Project process Number of days/weeks needed Start date End date Summer 2014 Summer 2014 STAGE ONE: Planning Choose a topic and conduct pilot research Summer 2014 Identify a manageable project – Title and initial ideas 1 week 01/10/2014 08/10/2014 Compile a detailed plan of the final project 1- 2 weeks 22/10/2014 05/11/2014 03/11/2014 19/01/2015 Produce the first draft of the project and Project 5 weeks documentation 08/12/2015 05/01/2015 Do any additional editing and research 3 weeks 20/01/2015 02/02/2015 1 week 04/02/2015 11/02/2015 1 day 18/03/2015 18/03/2015 1 week 18/03/2015 25/03/15 3 weeks 30/03/2015 20/04/15 03/04/2015 13/04/2015 3 days 19/05/2015 21/05/2015 1 day 25/04/2015 25/04/2015 STAGE TWO: Research Conduct research into chosen topic and complete EPQ 11 weeks Initial Plan and Diary STAGE THREE: Mid-project Review STAGE FOUR: Second draft and Presentation Check for errors and prepare second draft Present the project submission to a chosen audience Write up audience reaction information STAGE FIVE: Final draft Final proof-read (by a friend or yourself) and final editing Complete bibliography (this should be an on-going 1.5 weeks process through the research stages Get the final project bound Submit your EPQ project pg. 38 MINDMAP #1 pg. 39 MINDMAP #2 pg. 40 RECORD OF VERIFICATION OF TOPIC TITLE #1 Your first idea for topic/title What does the representation of women in Greek mythology say about Ancient Greek society? Your first ideas for researching and developing your project How realistic is/are the women’s representations/ portrayals? What do the women in mythology represent? What are some of the common vies held regarding the women and feminism in Ancient Greek society? What are some of the negative/positive representations of women? (What are their drives and motivations?) What are some of the common traits/ features these women have? (What can be implied from this? / What can/may this mean?) What was the typical role of the female in Ancient Greek Society? (How does mythology juxtapose this?) Did these mythological tales have an impact on the Ancient Greek society? (If so, how?) Has ancient Greece had an impact of modern/later/succeeding mythological tales and legends? (Are there any examples of this?) How does the representation of women in Greek mythology compare to modern women? How are women treated in Greek mythology? What myths and female mythological figures will/are being focused on? How important is the role of women in Greek Mythology? Are there any theories that can be applied to these myths? How many, if any, mythological tales about/ including females oppose patriarchy? What are the morals of these myths? Which of these myths supports feminism more strongly? Are there any alternative versions/tellings of these myths? (If so, why?) Are there any theories, concepts or explanations for these myths? Skills which I need to work on Integrating my own ideas Citing and bibliographies Evaluation Analysis Your Project Supervisors feedback and advice A very strong bank of questions which will give excellent direction to your project. These questions will allow for robust descriptions to be given, which will allow for some in depth analyses, theory applications and evaluations to be produced. The main message I get from reading your questions is that there will be a major focus on matching myth with feminism and how that explains or influenced the role of women in Ancient Greek pg. 41 society. I would like you to elaborate on the details of the skills you will need to develop. It is very useful that you have identified four skills in particular as there will be an opportunity in your final evaluation to determine how much these skills have become a part of your repertoire. This project deals with a very interesting and extremely emotive topic. It would be useful to see how you develop your arguments in the piece by, for example, considering the different points of view of historians or scholars in this area. I think this is going to be excellent, please prove me right!! Mike Project supervisor signature Date 11th October 2014 pg. 42 RECORD OF VERIFICATION OF TOPIC TITLE #2 Your second idea for topic/title To what extent are all women* in Greek mythology presented negatively? *women used to represent female sexed creatures as well Your second ideas for researching and developing your project How realistic are their representations in accordance to Greek society? What do women in mythology represent? What are some of the common views generally held about women and feminism in Ancient Greek society? What are some of the positive representations of women? What are some of the negative representations of women? What are some of the common traits/features these women share? What are their drives and motivations? How are women treated and regarded in mythology? What myths and female figures will be the main focus? How important is the role of women in mythology? How many (if any) myths about or including women contain the opposition of patriarchy? Which myths support feminism more strongly? Which theories (if any) best explain the representations of women in classical mythology? (include thought bubble/ spider diagram of ideas) Skills which I need to work on Integrating and developing my own ideas: [When I write, I usually stick to points that have been discussed in class or suggested etc. In this project am hoping for the chance to explore my own ideas and attempt to develop and implement them] Citing and bibliographies: [have no experience doing this but I think it would be beneficial to learn this skill in preparation for the work I will be doing at university] Setting and working to a proposed timetable and schedule (time management): [bad time keeping skills but good organisation; though I tend to do most things at the last minute. Looking to improve my commitment in sticking to a set schedule] Evaluating things more: [I do quite decent evaluation but there is room for improvement] Look to develop and extend critical discussion: [This was a target once of my teachers set me after a homework essay. I am looking to improve this skill particularly to aid me in class as well as to use in exams] Your Project Supervisors feedback and advice Useful skills for study, work and personal endeavours! It is good to see that you have refined your questions. It shows that you have conducted some pilot research and have considered your end product. Project supervisor signature Date 18th November 2014 pg. 43 RECORD OF VERIFICATION OF TOPIC TITLE #3 Your third idea for topic/title To what extent is Classical Greek mythology misogynistic? Your third ideas for researching and developing your project Do you think Greek mythology is misogynistic? What do women in mythology represent? What are some of the common views generally held about women and feminism in Ancient Greek society? What are some of the positive representations of women? What are some of the negative representations of women? What are some of the common traits/features these women share? What are their drives and motivations? What examples of misogyny are there in Greek mythology? How are women treated and regarded in mythology? What myths and female figures will be the main focus? How important is the role of women in mythology? How many (if any) myths about or including women contain the opposition of patriarchy? What are some of the arguments again Greek myths being misogynistic? If Greek myths are misogynistic, what are the reasons, if any? Skills which I need to work on Integrating and developing my own ideas: [When I write, I usually stick to points that have been discussed in class or suggested etc. In this project am hoping for the chance to explore my own ideas and attempt to develop and implement them] Citing and bibliographies: [have no experience doing this but I think it would be beneficial to learn this skill in preparation for the work I will be doing at university] Setting and working to a proposed timetable and schedule (time management): [bad time keeping skills but good organisation; though I tend to do most things at the last minute. Looking to improve my commitment in sticking to a set schedule] Evaluating things more: [I do quite decent evaluation but there is room for improvement] Look to develop and extend critical discussion: [This was a target once of my teachers set me after a homework essay. I am looking to improve this skill particularly to aid me in class as well as to use in exams] Your Project Supervisors feedback and advice Really nice to see how your work is becoming more streamlined. Hopefully this has been reflected in in your plan and diary. Project supervisor signature Date 26th March 2015 pg. 44 DISSERTATION PLAN “TO WHAT EXTENT IS CLASSICAL GREEK MYTHOLOGY MISOGYNISTIC?” Structure: Intro to essay Women (mention some of the ones in intro that you don’t have time to fully go in depth with, such as Empusa, Lamia etc- see women category sheet) (X10) o Women in myth are presented with male ideals (both positive and negative) o Appearance In text/ literature In images/ visuals o Myth(s) appears in Analysis of myth (x3) The Judgement of Paris Battle of Troy (features Amazons and Mortals) Another myth 2 themes (Themes section) o Power (define) French and Raven’s 5 bases of power ¾ examples of different types of power (which best captures each woman/ example) Legitimate power: (Clytemnestra) Referent power: (Clytemnestra -> Helen of Troy) Coercive power (generally the largest- many focus women fit into here): (The Amazons; Hera; Athena; Aphrodite; Charybdis + Scylla; Sirens) Reward power (also quite a few): (Clytemnestra; Hera; Aphrodite; Athena; Medea (expert power)) o R.P^: Goddesses’ reward power leads to coercive power o R.P^: fit here because they take revenge for those who fail to worship or honour them (e.g. Aphrodite with Atalanta and her husband) o Weakness (define) (manifested in many ways such as…) Jealousy (e.g. Aphrodite; Hera) Guile (cunning) (e.g. Revenge (e.g. Love (e.g. Appearance (e.g. Medusa) Alternate point of view (GMNM) o Arguments against Greek myths being misogynistic. 1) Women need to be protected 2) Women who possess unrestrained power and control are dangerous. (e.g. Medea; Clytemnestra etc) 3) Women brought/ bring negativity (Pandora) Arguments against alternate point of view o 1) Don’t need men to protect women// 2) Need to protect themselves look out for their best interests. pg. 45 Penelope (whilst Odysseus was away- she used her cunning to prolong suitors) The Amazons (able to survive in an all-woman state. Their demise comes once they come into contact with men (e.g. Argonauts) and start to change their ideals). Goddesses- Aphrodite & Hera (able to manipulate a number of menAphrodite made her husband try to have sex with Athena) o 3) Technically it’s Zeus’ fault… With Pandora, Zeus ordered Hephaestus to fashion her out of clay in order to ensnare Prometheus’ brother in retaliation for stealing fire and giving it to humans. Zeus was also the one that gave Pandora the storage jug that contained all the plagues of mankind, knowing she would open it as he had some of the other Olympians give her qualities such as curiosity and cunning etc. Conclusion: o Greek mythology is on the whole misogynistic. Although it shows women in and with power, they always come to their end at the hands of a man or/and almost all of these women are depicted to have at least two of the previously mentioned negative qualities, which under scrutiny, DO show them to be negative animas. pg. 46 DISSERTATION PLAN (ANNOTATED COPY) pg. 47 MID PROJECT REVIEW Successes, failures, additions and modifications made to my project: My project has demanded a lot from me as it required a lot more time than I had initially thought. Even though reading through the material I had collected proved to be slightly arduous, I have enjoyed the pressure and responsibility, mainly because I have chosen a topic I have a real interest in. I am sure I have chosen a brilliant idea for my project that I’ll stick with, as I haven’t deviated from it only reviewed it and made the title and focus of the project more specific. I did this as I felt that certain aspects of my project were really wide and would cover a lot of ground which, after thinking about it, I thought I was better off doing a more limited investigation/ exploration that was thorough and was able to focus on something- and also the more specific my project is, the easier it made researching, and the less material I have to go through (in theory). I have really engaged with it over the past few weeks, and I am curious to know the answer to the question I have proposed. I have attempted to follow the plans and schedule I've made with regards to my project, but it's been difficult as I had no foresight of other commitments that would interfere such as my film and history courseworks being very time consuming in addition to an unexpected history and politics trip to Brussels with the college. But as I’ve got back into my project I’ve found that, whilst hard to carry out in accordance to a time scale, having ideas, making detailed plans, and simplifying my notes and sources and having an outline of my thought process makes it much easier to pick up where I left off with my project and is less daunting than having to pick up a 500 page hardback book and leaf through it. Simplifying my notes has actually proved both useful and practical as I am able to carry these notes with me (whether it be on paper or on the Evernote note taking app on my smartphone) and have access to them at my convenience- meaning I am able to continue thinking about the direction my project is taking on the go. Since the start of my project I have had a number of successes and failures but I consider these of equal importance and value. Some successes have been easier than others, but they were all signposts that I was on the right track, that a particular technique worked for me, or that I was doing something right and I should continue with it. Some of my successes included: Identifying a project from the beginning that I’d be committed to, have a genuine interest in and would enjoy researching about. Being able to reduce the content and make it more specific from the initial idea (that wanted to focus on mythology, literature, religion, Athenian tragedy; how these compared to the role that women were said to have in that society and the role they currently have in ours). Thoroughness in project so far, in making lists, mind maps, initial plan and diary which cater for the future and provide prompts about what I should be doing) My tendency to over plan. This resulted in collecting more sources and materials than I need for one section of my project, but this is good as I was able to give myself a selection to look through and multiple opportunities to be assured by what I read but this is equally bad as it means I give myself more reading to do which I’d have to find time for. Researching and gathering materials. This is often quite simple as I was able to do this almost anywhere via my smartphone and various other apps such as Scribd, Wikipedia, and Google to find other materials. pg. 48 My failures have shown me that a particular way of doing things doesn’t work so effectively and that I would be more successful doing it another way, and it has also driven me to overcome obstacles I faced, to learn from my mistakes and draw from my experiences. (As Winston Churchill said, “Success is based on going from failure to failure without losing eagerness”). Some of my failures included: Time management- Sticking to the schedule I set myself. I started doing things in order of current importance, so coursework has been getting prioritised and I have only managed to stick to the first 4 dates in my schedule. Motivation- finding it hard to be able to get back into work from where I left off, and trouble working on project since Christmas holidays. Undermined time I’d take out for socialising, sleeping and my ‘down-time’. The schedule I set myself was, although optimistic, unrealistic as it didn’t cater to my working habits and other possible distractions and all obstacles. Not commenting/ showing my thought process in comment sections of initial plan and diary. Continuing to steadily work on my project has given me an idea of what to expect from similar independent projects at university and has also introduced me to what sort of research and preparation goes into writing a dissertation. I have gained the following skills so far: The layout of Harvard referencing for books. There’s an app on the Google Play Store called RefMe that allows you to scan the barcode of the book and it does the referencing, citing and bibliography for you, and changes the format depending on the type of source being used. Researching skills and comparing sources and provenance. Outline of planned steps to complete my project: Finish researching and gathering materials by week beginning Monday 16th March 2015 Complete 2 of the 3 compulsory evaluation forms. Write up first draft of dissertation week beginning Monday 16th March 2015 Work on presentation simultaneously to write up. Weekly/ fortnightly feedback sessions with Mike in the weeks coming up to the deadline. Redraft dissertation at least 2 times (AIM) Make sure I am prepared for the presentation (prepare some notes to go along with the slides/ or flash cards) Get a copy of the mark scheme Deliver the presentation to an audience Write up evaluation of presentation and presentation report Put work together- Get Mike to look at it a final time. Make any necessary changes. Bind together and submit with at least 2 days until the deadline. Changes, clarifications or additions made as a result of your discussion with project supervisor: Structuring of essay Limiting/ reducing the number of women featured in my project (as main points) pg. 49 pg. 50 THE DISSERTATION TO WHAT EXTENT IS CLASSICAL GREEK MYTHOLOGY MISOGYNISTIC? pg. 51 To What Extent Is Classical Greek Mythology Misogynistic? Misogyny is the hatred, dislike or mistrust of women. In ancient Greek society this view that women are inferior, weak and subordinate to men was allegorised in their myths and legends, which regularly presented women negatively and portrayed them as the negative unconscious feminine principal of a man’s inner personality (anima) that brought chaos, danger and death, symbolised in the myth of Pandora’s Box. Several other females (including female-sexed creatures) in mythology share the similarity of being threats to men, to cite a few, Mania the Goddess of Insanity & the Dead; Nemesis the Goddess of Retribution & Vengeance; Lamia, a monster that hunts and devours children, and Empusa, known for seducing young men as they slept and drinking their blood and eating their flesh, these females share the similarity of being threats to men in myology. Despite my view that Greek mythology is misogynistic, I also see that it is a more complicated and intricate issue than it initially appears to be. Whilst arguing my viewpoint, I am going to discuss and explore the misogynistic attitudes present in mythology, mainly on 7 popular female figures- deities: Hera, Aphrodite, Athena and The Amazons; mortals: Clytemnestra and Helen of Troy; and the monster: Medusa. Arguments For Classical Greek Myths Being Misogynistic The Amazons show some of the attitudes that the Greeks (patriarchy) held regarding females, and humanises the extent to which mythology can be seen as misogynistic. The Amazons were a fabled nation of independent, all-female warriors. The eighth century BC author, Homer, was the first to mention the existence of the Amazons, who have since then appeared in texts such as Herodotus’ Histories, described as ‘androktones’ (‘killers of men’). Misogyny first appears in the classical presentations of them which stem partly from Herodotus’ analysis of the word “Amazoi”, which he perceived to literally mean “without breasts” or “breastless”. He and others believed the Amazons commonly practiced self-mutilation in the form of removing, amputating or cutting off their right breast. Those wholly convinced of this point to the fact that they believed this to be a “necessary evil” in order to overcome all possible hindrances to using a spear or drawing an arrow1, but are divided are what stage of life this would be at. Although many suggest that this would have happened to young girls whilst still in childhood, and others when the breast had fully developed, an alternate view suggests that this happened as a sort of rite of passage for a female to leave childhood and enter womanhood. This idea, that the Amazons were breastless, makes little sense looking at many artworks which depict the female warriors with breasts, and more so in reference to modern culture and popular fiction. The Author of The Amazons, Adrienne Mayor, agrees that the idea isn’t realistic: “...anyone who’s watched The Hunger Games [Gary Ross, 2012] or female archers, knows that it is an absolutely physiologically ridiculous idea.” (Worrall, 2014) 1 Greeka.com: The Greek Island Specialists [online]. [n. pub], [n.d], [cited 20 January 2015]. Available from: <http://www.greeka.com/greece-myths/amazons.htm> pg. 52 A number of other females such as Princess Merida2, Neytiri te Tskaha Mo'at’ite3 and Fa Mulan4 show that females with both breasts are more than capable of excelling in the art of using a bow. In addition, medically the act of cauterising, cutting off or forcibly removing the breast would have caused immense haemorrhage and would have resulted in the death of the woman. Palmer (2011) supports this as he comments that the Amazons relied heavily on their upper body strength and the kind of muscle damage that would be sustained from this process wouldn’t allow them to draw a bow or swing a sword. This insight leads us to the logical conclusion that there would have been no way to perform such mastectomies at the time without a rather high loss of life, and complications and ‘risks’ to the development and health of their muscles and tissues. But whilst the binding of the breasts would cause other possible development problems, it would have been a much safer alternative by being less detrimental to the Amazons’ health and development, which makes the theory that the Greeks made up this rumour more plausible in addition to their observable misogyny, as the Amazons would have been aware of this with the wellbeing of the tribe in mind. Their presentation as savages and barbarians transcends the rumours of them amputating a breast. Despite their smoking hemp5, drinking kumis6 and getting tattoos, it was also said that they mutilated, maimed and sometimes killed their own male offspring. The Amazonian practice of mating was, in short, wild and promiscuous and the children that developed from this, if male, were said to be killed, blinded, maimed, or sent to their father if they were lucky enough. According to Mayor, the latter is the most likely of what happened to the male children in the Amazon society and this is in addition to the fact that early beliefs assumed Amazons were not permitted to enter into marriage as this was a form of slaver to man, his family and your children, which would lead the women to subservience, is used as proof by modern scholars that the Amazons abandoned their maternal duties. However, Mayor criticises this view and doesn’t see this as the females abandoning their role as mothers, as this common custom in antiquity, called fosterage, was considered a way of confirming treaties and ensuring good relations with another tribe, which a number of males throughout history have experienced. Ancient Greek works of art that often depicted the combats between the Amazons and the Greeks, referred to as Amazonomachies, and included myths such as Hercules’ ninth labour of retrieving Hippolyta’s girdle , her death, and Theseus’ abduction of Antiope. Although amazonomachy can be seen as the rise of feminism in Greek culture, Page duBois identifies that in these arts the Amazons were portrayed as a savage and barbaric race, whilst the Greeks, a civilised race of human progress. duBois sees the Amazonomachies as representing the Greek ideal of civilisation, signalising the Greek triumph over everything barbarous, of all monstrosity and grossness.7 Early art shows them being similar in model to the goddess Athena with a bow, spear, double axe, half shield and a helmet, whilst later art presents them more like the goddess Artemis, wearing only a thin dress, 2 Brave. Dir. Mark Andrews, and Brenda Chapman. Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures. 2012 Avatar. Dir. James Cameron. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. 2009 4 Mulan. Dir. Tony Bancroft, and Barry Cook. Buena Vista Pictures. 1998 5 cannabis 6 a powerful concoction of fermented mare’s milk containing a higher alcohol content 7 Page duBois, Centaurs and Amazons: Women and the Pre-History of the Great Chain of Being. (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1986; repr., 1991) 3 pg. 53 girded high for speed8, then in Persian attire . Mark Cartwright (2012) identifies that sculptures, statutes and reliefs were, “an important method of mass communication and depictions of heroes fighting Amazons reminded ordinary people that the political leaders had successfully defended Greek culture against the threat of foreign, and in Greek eyes less civilised, invaders.” The size and Persian-esque change to the Amazons’ clothing may serve as a sign to show them as “barbarous foreigners” who do not belong to and are very far removed from Greek culture, tradition and society. Dismembering the Amazons would make them out to be threatening the culture, tradition and societal norms of Ancient Greece, which discourages the development of strong females in everyday life. “…for a particular society, The Amazons become the Other being upon whom are projected all of society’s doubts, fears, and prejudices; the Amazon is the exact opposite of what a proper woman should be… her culture is the unnatural opposite of the natural order” (Worrall, 2014) The negative view of The Amazons that circulated in early stories stemmed from the fact that the ancient Greeks, whilst fascinated with them, didn’t really understand or know much about them so most of what was shared was hearsay or ideas they had come up with to explain the continuity of their race. The ideas that propagated since then about them being “single breasted barbarians who killed male children” etc., were accepted as they assumed their society was strictly female only. After they overcame their ignorance, the ancient Greeks consciously controlled the Amazons’ presentation and representation to dissuade females in their own society from adopting similar behaviours, traits and mannerisms of these liberated, strong and independent women. This Amazon society provided a counterpoint to the Greek societies where only men could be valorous and wanted to keep women subservient and shown masculinity always conquers feminity no matter how equally matched, as shown in the Amazonomachies where the females’ defeats are immortalised. The Amazons are noted for their courage, pride and more famously (or rather infamously) for their opposition to patriarchy. Although independent of men and patriarchy they can still be seen to submissive and weak as they ultimately loose the battles against various Greek heroes (all of whom are male).There are almost 400 surviving examples of Hercules’ triumph over the Amazons as well as several other works decorating the shield of the statue of Athena Parthenos in the Parthenon (438 BCE), on the temple of Athena Nike on the Athenian Acropolis (c. 425 – 420 BCE), and on the temple of Ares in the Athens Agora showing Amazons being defeated. Surprisingly though, Mayor points out that even in defeat, only two or three of approximately 1300 images of Amazons are depicted gesturing for mercy and she considers this as a sign of empowerment as they are shown to be “extremely courageous and heroic”, and I may have to partially agree. But I believe that misogyny in the beginning was from ignorance but once the Greeks felt threatened by their culture and the effect it would have on their own if left unrestrained, they would have had adopted a vested interest in making the enemy seem as fearsome as possible whilst presenting themselves in a much more favourable light, leading to the negative representations and intentional misogyny. 8 The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica, Amazon | Greek mythology [online]. Encyclopædia Britannica, updated 10 August 2014 [cited 18 January 2015]. Available from: <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/18672/Amazon> pg. 54 A number of independent psychoanalyses of the goddesses indicate that in Neopaganism, a previous and archaic culture, the Triple Goddess was actually worshipped instead of individual and separate goddesses seen in later mythologies. Herodotus’ Histories is said to have actually given the Olympian Gods their personalities and developed them in a way where they could be distinguished from one another. In Neopaganism, the archaic Triple Goddess consists of three female figures, frequently described as The Maiden, The Mother, and The Crone. Each of these figures symbolizes both a separate stage in the female life cycle and a phase of the moon which, in some interpretations, is perceived as aspects of a greater single divinity. In specific relation to the three well-known Olympian goddesses, Athena, Hera and Aphrodite, and their reception in classical Greek myths, elements of this Neo-paganist view manifest in the theme of the goddesses appearing in threes, and representing the different aspects of the Triple Goddess. There have been numerous instances where Aphrodite has punished those who neglected her or despised her power, as well as favouring and protecting those who paid homage to her and recognised her power. She punished the Assyrian princess with an intense sexual attraction to her father which caused her to commit incest one night, in retaliation for her rather boasting that she was more beautiful than Aphrodite herself. Like French and Raven point out, Aphrodite’s power is dependent on others recognising and accepting her power in order for her to be or remain powerful, or, at least in regards to her reward power, her possessing something that others want. The most successful recognition of her power came from Paris, in the origin story for the Trojan War. In this myth The Judgement of Paris, she tempted him into giving her Eris’ golden apple, declaring her ‘The Fairest’ by overwhelming him with the intoxication of her words aided by visual displays of her body. “... she tilted her head so that her hair fell forward, concealing a blush on her face. Then she loosened the girdle of her robe and beneath it, Paris caught sight of her perfect formed breast, white as alabaster. …“Give me the apple and… you will possess the most beautify woman in the land, a women equal to me in perfection of form. With her you will experience the greatest delights of lovemaking. Choose me, Paris, and she will be yours”9 Paris was taken with the deal of guaranteed love with the most beautiful woman that matched the beauty of Aphrodite; she helped him successfully elope with Helen. In regards to Athena, she initially doesn’t appear to be to be misogynistic as she is a powerful female, who exemplifies wisdom, strength, intelligence, strategy and skill, and as such is an inspiring role for women. Graves describes her mercy as being “great: when the judges’ votes are equal in a criminal trial, she always gives a casting vote to liberate the accused” but to cite Athena in Aiscgylos’ drama, Eumeniudes: “It is my duty to give the final judgment and I shall cast my vote for Orestes. | For there was no mother who gave me birth; and in all things, except for marriage, whole-heartedly I am for the male 9 Steve Eddy, and Claire Hamilton, Understand Greek Mythology: Teach Yourself (United Kingdom: Teach Yourself Books, 2012), p.126 pg. 55 and entirely on the father’s side. Therefore, I will not award greater honor to the death of a woman who killed her husband, the master of the house.”10 J. E. Harrison described the story of Athena’s birth from Zeus’ head as “a desperate theological expedient to rid her of her matriarchal conditions”11 and shows that this quote can equally be inferred as Athena supporting and encouraging male patriarchy. Ellen Brundidge believes could lead to the interpretation of Athena’s misogyny as she claims Orestes is guiltless of matricide because of her view that a mother is only a vessel, and the father is the sole contributor of genetic material, Athena citing herself as proof that a mother is non-essential to procreation, although her wisdom is said to come from her mother, Metis (‘thought’). Athena is shown to be misogynistic in a number of ways. This includes aesthetic things such as her donning a male disguise whenever she comes to the aid of the Greek heroes. Whilst some may see this as evidence of her encouraging patriarchy and its values, I don't really think this provides or furthers a strong case. Females in Greek society were excluded from the public sphere of things so if Athena had adopted a female disguise, she wouldn't be as helpful or effective due to the possibility of the male heroes insisting women have no place in the affairs of men and, as a consequence, refusing their help. The only time we don't see this is in Jason and Medea’s relationship, where Jason had a strong reliance on her. Medea enchanted the dragon enabling Jason to get the Golden Fleece, killed the giant Talos enabling the Heroes to continue their journey home and Jason allows her to kill the usurping king to avenge his parents’ deaths. I believe her heavy involvement with males should be seen as the successful infiltration of the male sphere. Dr Christie Downing similarly interprets Athena's involvement with men in a more positive way- to represent that women are able to have meaningful relationships with men based on intellect, camaraderie, shared projects etc., as not all female-male relationships need to be predicated on or reduced to sex. In addition to this, the fact that she remained a virgin some also see to encourage patriarchal values that women should remain pure, innocent and indifferent to the sexual advances of men. The degree of naivety that accompanies this innocence is shown when Athena misses the sexual implication in Hephaestus' coy reply of "undertaking the work for love" after asking him to forge her weapons. Although Athena is so heavily involved in the male sphere, she is also said to preside over all women's crafts as she ‘such as cooking, weaving and spinning’,12 but has a number of negative relationships with other women from a young age, where she (accidentally) killed her playmate, Pallas, whilst they were engaged in friendly combat with spears and a shield.13 10 Ellen Brundige, The Goddess Athena: Feminist or Misogynist? [online]. Mythphile, 2010 [cited 28 March 2015]. Available from: <http://www.mythphile.com/2010/10/the-goddess-athena-feminist-or-misogynist/> 11 Robert Graves, The Greek Myths: The Complete and Definitive Edition (United Kingdom: Penguin Books Ltd, 2011), p. 46 12 Graves, p. 96 13 Ibid, p. 44 pg. 56 Themes Power and weakness are two general themes I have observed in relation to women and their portrayal and representations in Greek mythology. These are general enough to incorporate the more minor themes such as jealously, revenge, love and appearance. Although power is generally defined as “[the] ability to control people and events”14, the concept can be broken down and its specific types can be defined. Social psychologists John R. P. French and Bertram Raven divided power into five separate and distinct forms which they identified as legitimate, referent, expert, coercive and reward power, and analyse how power works, or fails to work, in a specific relationship. “O must draw on the ‘base’ or combination of bases of power appropriate to the relationship to affect the desired outcome. Drawing on the wrong power base can have unintended effects, including a reduction in O’s own power” (French & Raven, 1959) The five bases of power French and Raven identified can be observed in the females, and at least one type summarises the type of power they have. Helen of Troy is a good example of a female who possesses referent power. This type of power is dependent on Helen’s likability or how much those around her admire or identify with her. In comparison the type of power Clytemnestra wields is best encapsulated in legitimate power. Legitimate power (also called positional power) is when an individual acquires authority from election, selection or appointment which is reliant on their position in the authority hierarchy. This has been identified as a negative type of power as it stems from a belief that a person has the formal right to make demands and expect complete compliance from others. Clytemnestra’s authority and legitimate power derive from her marriage to Agamemnon- the king of Mycenae. In “The Iliad” she is described to be weak and insignificant in comparison to the males in the text, although the audience receive her as a blameless figure as she appeared to simply be a means in Aegisthus’ plot to finally kill Agamemnon. “At first Queen Clytemnestra turned a deaf ear to this dishonourable schemer. She was a sensible woman… [Aegisthus]… carried Clytemnestra off to his own house, fond lover, willing lady.” (Homer, Reiu, and Jones, 1991, p.38) Naturally Clytemnestra didn’t give in at first, but the longer war went on, the more her resolve weakened and eventually she gave in to Aegisthus’ attempts to woo her. We see here that she has no real role in her husband's murder aside from falling prey to Aegisthus' attempts to charm and seduce her in the midst of loneliness. Robert E. Bell advocates a similar blameless and weak Clytemnestra in his analysis and commentary on Hyginus’ Fabulae. Bell recognises Clytemnestra as a victim of both her husband and lover, and states that, in addition to the murder of Iphigenia, her adultery was specifically due to the meddling of Aphrodite and her influence over Clytemnestra’s two other sisters, Helen and Timandra, who had cursed them to be adulteresses. 14 power definition, meaning – what is power in the British English Dictionary & Thesaurus [online]. Cambridge University Press, 2015 [cited: 4 March 2015]. Available from: <http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/power> pg. 57 Aeschylus’ version of Clytemnestra is perhaps the most known and ‘celebrated’ in his Oresteia trilogy, she isn't shown to be the feeble and weak character that Homer described, but in fact reversed the roles, with Aegisthus playing the accessory who Clytemnestra convinces to help her with mariticide. Shortly after Agamemnon and Cassandra finally return and enter the palace, a cry is heard and Clytemnestra, drenched in blood, is shown standing over their dead bodies. She leads Aegisthus inside and tells him with a confident authority that they will be joint rulers in Argos, but it's hard to doubt that Aegisthus will still remain an accessory to Clytemnestra once he marries her to become king. Although Aeschylus’ Clytemnestra did have a hand in her husband’s murder, readers are able to sympathise with her to an extent as they probably view this as a plausible reaction to him killing her daughter and undermining her position by returning with Cassandra. However, the extent of sympathy towards her character is reduced by her involvement with Aegisthus, and more so if we are to account for her plot to kill her son, Orestes, especially as she was so distressed about the death of her daughter Iphigenia. Interestingly, many of the poets who have remade Clytemnestra mention that she had once been married to the pervious king of Mycenae, Tantalus, who Agamemnon murdered along with their new-born child before he forcibly married her, but mention no recollection of the parallel of losing another of her children, which could have intensified the feelings she acquired for her husband which then led her to kill him. Clytemnestra’s first presentation by Homer shows her as no more than a subdued and pathetic female, much like how women were considered in actual Greek society, who’s only purpose in the eyes of men was a means to power and ruling the capital of Mycenae. She displays traits such as submissiveness, subjugation and meekness, traits which are associated with the negative female anima. In spite of this, the negative traits that the later Clytemnestra exhibits are those of cunning, deception, and lack of loyalty aren’t much better, even if she is presented as powerful, autonomous and a person of authority. Weakness is commonly defined as ‘a state or condition of being weak’ or ‘a disadvantage or fault’, 15 and elements of weakness can be seen in negative traits. Negative traits include jealousy; meddling, revenge and guile are male ideals of the negative ideals of women just as beauty; nurturing and kindness are the positive ideals.16 The Greeks saw the negative traits of women as representing the anima, or femaleness in themselves, which they considered a weakness that was to be resisted and subdued at all costs. Therefore they had to overcome many females on their journeys, both mortals, deities and monsters, who displayed various combinations of negative traits. An example of this variety of feminine types that the Hero Odysseus came into contact with- Circe, Calypso, the Sirens, Nausica- throughout his ordeals. Each were faced and dealt with according to their difficulty with Odysseus using the anima within him to solve the problem set and outsmart them. 15 ‘Weakness’ [online]. Collins English Dictionary [n.d] (HarperCollins Publishers) [cited March 2015]. Available from: <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/weakness> 16 Jud, House, The Representation of Women in Greek Myths [online]. [n. pub], 2012 [cited: 2 October 2014]. Available from: < http://judsjottings.wordpress.com/essays/the-representation-of-women-in-greek-myths/> pg. 58 Jealousy is a recurring idea throughout mythology which the author Ovid has explored to a great extent in many of the myths he has retold. There are a couple of times that Athena displayed petulant jealousy, in the instance of her weaving competition against Arachnae. In this myth, Arachnae, an excellent weaver, boasts that she is better at Athena. Her hubris got Athena’s attention, which sees her enter a weaving match with Athena. Upon inspection of Arachne’s work, though Athena can't find anything wrong with the actual weaving, she is outraged at the depictions of the scandalous affairs of the gods. Athena rips the girl’s tapestry because it is technically flawless, strikes her, and humiliates her so that she hangs herself; Athena then transforms her into a spider. This can be seen as an appropriate reaction for someone who so craftily incorporated the infidelities of the gods into a craft that was the speciality of the goddess which was both impious and disrespectful to her genealogy, but whilst we may say Arachne invited divine punishment, there are hints of bitter jealousy in Athena’s treatment of her that go beyond justice. This is similar to the punishments Aphrodite invoked on the worshippers of Dionysius when they refused to recognise and worship her, despite being seen as a frightful and rather weak goddess in The Iliad. Her display of coercive power comes from the belief that she could punish other for non-compliance, for example, when homage isn’t paid or in instances of someone besting her aesthetically. A second time Athena’s jealous nature can be observed is with her different treatments of the rapes of both Kassandra and Medusa. Kassandra was violated during the sack of Troy which outrages Athena so much so that she borrow a lightning bolt from Zeus and kills the culprit by cracking open his ship. Medusa, on the other hand, gets a harsh treatment for having sex in her temple- even though it was actually rape perpetrated by Poseidon. The difference in the two instances is that where Kassandra was violated by a mortal, Medusa was raped by one of the top three Olympian Gods. There is an argument that Athena was not powerful enough to punish one of the main gods so settled with punishing her instead. In another version of the myth, a beautiful Medusa boasts about being more beautiful than Athena (amongst other comments about herself) and she also, to an extent invites a similar divine punishment to Arachnae. Athena’s relationships with women are rarer and more ambivalent than her connections with men, and there is often a hint of rivalry, personified greatly in The Judgement of Paris myth where he provoked the wrath of both Athena and Hera due to Paris choosing Aphrodite as the recipient of the apple. Hera is the wife and sister of Zeus. She married him to hide her shame of being taken advantage of and raped. Though Hera was the goddess of women and marriage and represented the integrity of marriage, her own marriage was turbulent and they often clashed as a result of Zeus’ numerous affairs. Throughout mythology, Hera has displayed the negative traits of jealousy, especially to mortals and those who bore her husband, children some of whom are demigods or heroes, some of which Zeus notes amongst his conquests before making love to her: “[…]For never before has love for any goddess or woman | so melted about the heart inside me, broken it to submission, |as now: not that time when I loved the wife of Ixion |who bore me Peirithoos, equal of the gods in counsel, |nor when I loved Akrisios’ daughter, sweet-stepping Danae, |who bore Perseus to me, pre-eminent among all men, |nor when I loved the daughter of farrenowned Phoinix, Europa |who bore Minos to me, and Rhadamanthys the godlike; |not when I loved Semeke, or Alkmene in Thebe, |when Semele’s son was Dionysos, the pleasure of mortals; |not pg. 59 when I loved the Queen Demeter of the lovely tresses, |not when it was glorious Leto, nor yourself, so much |as now I love you, and the sweet passion has taken hold of me.” 17 Hera is shown to be weak as she is unable and lacks to power to stop her husband from perusing other gods, demigods and mortals, even though she does interfere. Hera is additionally seen to be a weak female because she never outright rebelled against Zeus after a failed attempt in cahoots with the other gods where Zeus punished her and hung her from the stars with an anvil attached to each foot. She, instead, interferes with his plans and often outwitted him and utilised tactics like borrowing Aphrodite’s girdle to seduce and distract him when she had a hidden agenda. Her tactics when doing so are sneaky and encourages the misogynistic view that women cannot be trusted. Hera had notable hatred for one of the offspring of Zeus’ infidelities, Hercules, and she made life very difficult for him by setting in motion the events which led to his 12 labours. Though she exhumes little power and influence, she, as well as the other goddesses’ reward power and coercive power are very tightly interlinked, each playing on the other in a way that ensures the continued recognition of their power. The monster Medusa, on the other hand, is also a more complex character. In classical Greek mythology she is generally portrayed as the embodiment of all things feminine, something which again must be mastered by Greek civilisation. She is generally portrayed quite negatively literally as a monster, inhuman and that should be feared, but modern reception of her has viewed her in a more positive light.18 Arguments Against Classical Greek Myths Being Misogynistic The first argument, that women need to be protected, may cite certain tales like Perseus saving his mother Danaë from the constant pursuit of King Polydectes, who he later turned to stone with Medusa’s head; as well as Andromeda, after her family and city abandoned her and left her chained to a rock, as a sacrifice, for a sea monster to devour. Her mother boasted about Andromeda’s beauty surpassing the Nereids’19 and as a result they got a sea monster to terrorise their coast and scare people from their homes, enough so that when her father consulted the oracle and was told that he would have to sacrifice Andromeda to get rid of the sea monster, the people actively encouraged this. When Perseus comes across Andromeda, she is every bit our modern interpretation of a damsel in distress, “stand[ing] helpless, awaiting the monster…”20, and it’s not too far-fetched to imagine she would have swooned if not chained to the rock so tightly. But if we look in reference to other females in mythology, we see that they realistically don’t need men to protect them, as they have proved able to look after themselves. Penelope, for example, 17 Stephen Kershaw, A Brief Guide to Greek Myth (Brief History Of) (United Kingdom: Little, Brown Book Group, 2007) 18 ‘Medusa: Analysis’ [online] <http://medusa.plush.org/analysis.shtml> [cited 11 March 2014] 19 The fifty Sea Nymphs, known also as Goddesses of the Sea. 20 Geddes Grosset, Classical mythology: A dictionary of the tales, characters and traditions of Classical mythology (United Kingdom: Geddes & Grosset Ltd, 1997), p. 61 pg. 60 showed in her capabilities in 10 years of managing to keep a total of 108 suitors at bay for 20 years whilst her husband, Odysseus, was fighting in the Trojan War. Homer tells us that there were: “…not just ten Suitors, or twenty, but many times more than that…From Dulichium there are fiftytwo… with six serving men. From Same there are twenty-four, and from Zacynthus twenty noblemen; from Ithaca itself a dozen of its best, and with them Medon the herald, and an inspired minstrel, besides two servants, expert carvers.” (Odyssey, 16.245-53) Although Penelope did this using qualities previously deemed negative, she was able to remain faithful to her husband- even when many were convinced that he was dead. She depended on no men to ensure that the suitors didn’t destroy her city, as well as protected herself from the pervasive threat of them being increasingly complacent guests in her house for an elongated period. Nothing this, men often aren’t the protectors, as they are repeatedly the ones that bring harm to women. In the instance of Medusa, she was seduced and raped by Poseidon and went from the victim to the respondent, then after being cursed and banished to an island to live in isolation, she was hunted down and successfully slain by Perseus. The other warriors who were turned to stone as a result of failing to kill Medusa, all consciously intended to harm her, even though she brought no harm to anyone that didn’t seek her out. Naturally being faced with the two options of fighting or fleeing, Medusa had to opt for the former due to her being trapped and having nowhere to flee to. This does, to a degree, remove some of the blame from her, but then we run into a similar paradox observed with Clytemnestra and Helen etc. By removing any of the blame, they become weak victims of their circumstance, and if we don’t, they remain vicious, threatening, adulteresses- fated to be the undoing of men. Another argument against Greek myths being misogynistic is that the women who possess unrestrained power and control are dangerous because they misuse their power and endanger those around them. This abuse of power can be observed in a number of these women. Aphrodite, for example, has manipulated both mortals and other Olympian Gods into falling in love or cursing them because, in accordance to coercive power, her power wasn’t recognised in the way she wanted and is said to have engineered the Trojan War from the beginning. In addition to this, many ‘monsters’ (those not mortals or deities) appear to be vengeful and use their power, especially over men, to entice and kill men, like the Sirens attempted to do in The Odyssey by causing the sailors to ship wreck after luring them close to the rocks with their song. Whatever type of power, when left unrestrained, can quickly escalate like Clytemnestra, who, in the absence of Agamemnon, grew complacent with the power she had. Her power that was a result of her position could only be really taken away by Agamemnon and this comes under threat with the arrival of Cassandra. The causes her to take drastic measures to retain that power (as well as other reasons previously stated). In the instance of Euripides’ Medea, a similar thing happens although she does draw from the expert power base and the power she has technically isn’t dependent on anyone else. When Jason abandons Medea and their children in an attempt to remarry to gain a higher position, Medea also ends up murdering the woman who threatens her position as Jason’s wife, though she doesn’t actually kill Jason. Some argue that killing her children was to annihilate all products of her and Jason’s union. Medea would have been exiles as a result of Creon, the King or Corinth, being fearful of what she may do to his daughter, Glauce. Although she does hesitate to kill pg. 61 her children, as well as her brother in a previous story, the fact the she does suggests that she won’t show reluctance to remove anything or anyone who stands in the way of her goal. On the other hand, women need this unrestrained power and control to protect their best interests. For Medea, this was to ensure that she wasn’t exiled and have her children removed from her custody. Clytemnestra, similarly, had to protect her position of Queen which Agamemnon and Cassandra threatened, as his reinforcement of her power was dependent on his whims and feelings towards her. Whilst I do agree that too much power hasn’t proved appropriate for any individual, it appears to be necessary for the aforementioned females. The third case put forward as to why Greek myths aren’t misogynistic is that, generally as is seen throughout a number of myths, women bring and are associated heavily with negativity. As we have seen, these women bring and encourage negativity from the implications of their power on men, to the misuse of their power. They manipulate and play on men’s weaknesses, impose hardships on those who do not receive them in a way deemed suitable as well as schemingly instigate wars and conflicts. To justify this view, people look back to the myth of Pandora, the first woman, who was created for the purpose of punishment and revenge and is responsible for releasing the plagues of mankind onto the world; peaceful before the creation of women. Technically it’s Zeus’ fault that (mortal) women bring negativity. With Pandora, Zeus ordered Hephaestus to fashion her out of clay in order to ensnare Prometheus’ brother in retaliation for stealing fire and giving it to humans. Fashioning Pandora out of clay made her officially the first mortal human woman, and the and the majority of the females that came into being after this would be of direct relation to her, just like Eve in the Christian creation story. Zeus was also the one that gave Pandora the storage jug that contained all the plagues of mankind, knowing she would open it as he had some of the other Olympians give her (negative) qualities such as curiosity and cunning. This ensured in a sense that the generation that followed after Pandora would be seen as equally responsible for destroying the harmony mankind had once known prior to the existence of mortal women, and encourages the Greek belief that women were created by the gods as a punishment on men. It can be denied that it this negativity is encouraged by the male as women have continued this tradition of releasing tribulation to mankind as Aphrodite gave her daughter, Harmonia, a necklace that brought great misfortune to all of its wearers or owners. However, the necklace had been made by Hephaestus’ to curse any lineage of children resulting from Aphrodite’s’ affairs in retaliation to her infidelity. To summarise, Greek myths were often orated rather than written down so there are still are a few deviations between the tellings of some myths, seen blatantly in the change in presentation from Homer to Seminudes and Acyleus. I believe that altering the myths served to prove the point that females were a [necessary] evil. Females (the triple goddess) had previously been worshiped and their This influence of Asian religion omitted the kind, loving, nurturing, and powerful traits, replacing them, or rather exaggerating their negative qualities jealousy, revenge, and meddling and, guile or presenting them as androgynous figures with non-threatening characteristics to make them pg. 62 less threatening to men and the newly established patriarchal system in society. Ovid, for example, fascinated by female jealousy, exaggerated this instinctual emotions and feelings in both genders and manipulated it to fit their agendas. Athena has fewer flaws in comparison to the other females focused on, which may be due to the fact that she is a male--dominated goddess. Although saying so is to, somewhat impose our modern values on a different and preceding society, the Ancient Greeks have had a definite and heavy influence on western societies and civilisations and are likely to have had an influence on our values and attitudes towards things. There is undoubtedly a misogynistic tone running throughout classical Greek mythology, due to the fat that paradoxes arise whatever way we look at or interpret them. If women aren’t powerful, they must be weak- and weakness and passivity are negative traits. Conversely, if women are powerful they are vengeful, threatening and become a danger which also links back to negative traits. Words (excluding footnotes and bibliography): 6 242 pg. 63 BIBLIOGRAPHY Avatar (2009) Directed by James Cameron [Film]. USA: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Brave (2012) Directed by Mark Andrews, Brenda Chapman [Film]. USA: Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Brundige, Ellen, The Goddess Athena: Feminist or Misogynist? [online]. Mythphile, 2010 [cited 28 March 2015]. Available from: <http://www.mythphile.com/2010/10/the-goddess-athena-feministor-misogynist/> DuBois, P. (1991) Centaurs and Amazons: Women and the Pre-History of the Great Chain of Being. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press Eddy, Steve, and Claire Hamilton, Understand Greek Mythology: Teach Yourself (United Kingdom: Teach Yourself Books, 2012) Graves, R., The Greek Myths: The Complete and Definitive Edition. (United Kingdom: Penguin Books Ltd, 2011) Greeka.com: The Greek Island Specialists [online]. [n. pub], [n.d], [cited 20 January 2015]. Available from: <http://www.greeka.com/greece-myths/amazons.htm> Grosset, Geddes, Classical mythology: A dictionary of the tales, characters and traditions of Classical mythology (United Kingdom: Geddes & Grosset Ltd, 1997), p. 61 Homer, D.C.H. Rieu and Peter Jones, The Odyssey, 1st edn (United Kingdom: Penguin Books Ltd, 1991) Jud House, ‘The Representation of Women in Greek Myths’, Jud’s Creative Writing Medley [online] (WordPress, 2012). Available from <http://judsjottings.wordpress.com/essays/the-representationof-women-in-greek-myths/> [cited 2 October 2014]. Kershaw, Stephen, A Brief Guide to Greek Myth (Brief History Of) (United Kingdom: Little, Brown Book Group, 2007) McPhee, J. (2013) The Helens of Troy. Available at: http://www.bookslut.com/the_bombshell/2013_05_020104.php (Accessed: 23 March 2015) Mulan (1998) Directed by Tony Bancroft, Barry Cook [Film]. USA: Buena Vista Pictures power definition, meaning – what is power in the British English Dictionary & Thesaurus [online]. Cambridge University Press, 2015 [cited: 4 March 2015]. Available from: <http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/power> The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica, Amazon | Greek mythology [online]. Encyclopædia Britannica, updated 10 August 2014 [cited 18 January 2015]. Available from: <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/18672/Amazon> pg. 64 ‘Weakness’ [online]. Collins English Dictionary [n.d] (HarperCollins Publishers) [cited March 2015]. Available from: <http://diction ary.reference.c om/browse/we akness> PRESENTATION 1 2 2 2 3 4 2 2 5 6 2 2 7 8 2 2 9 10 2 2 65 pg. AUDIENCE REACTION (TO PRESENTATION) Overall I am pleased with the presentation I gave as I was able to get a lot of constructive feedback as well as the chance to share my work with my peers. On the whole, it was a great experience as in addition to being able to improve my presentational skills, it gave me more of a taster to the sorts of things I’ll be expected to do a university and maybe also in future employment. The presentation was an important part of the project for me as I would be able to convey my level of interest and engagement to others, and if I failed to do it well then it would appear that I’m not that passionate about my topic, which would result in failing to keep my audience entertained and decrease my chances of getting the highest grade possible. Furthermore, I liked the freedom I was given as I was able to do something that had vague links to my studies, but kept me interested from the beginning. Strengths My project was about something I have a genuine interest in which allowed me to convey my passion to others and give my point of view about my chosen topic title. Enthusiasm about my project rid me of my self-consciousness so I was able to engross myself in my project and the words and ideas I wanted want to get across. As my attention was focused on the audience I could gauge their reactions to see how my ideas are being received, so if they looked confused, I could break down what I said and make it easier for them to learn, to enjoy or to see my point of view and maybe even get them to share my enthusiasm. I was able to successfully adapt my presentation to my audience, without losing informational value. Even though I did use some jargon specific to my project, I limited the amount I used as I didn’t want to stop the audience from engaging with my presentation and the research I’d done if they weren’t familiar with them. I was able to engage the audience through the use of rhetorical questions, which both captured their attention and also got them thinking about (or maybe even challenge) their own point of view. As I didn’t pack the slides full with information, it left some room for me to improvise a bit when presenting. What could be improved/ what would I do differently next time? I could have made myself a bit clearer at points (notably in the beginning where I was a bit nervous but as I became more comfortable presenting and engrossed with sharing my topic, this became less of a problem) Although I put some examples of women’s portrayal in myths on a couple of slides, I should have added more contextual information and discussion about the women so the audience can feel more informed and engaged at the end. This was the main focus of my project and topic title so I should have put a greater emphasis on it. Something which was pointed out in the feedback was the lack of visuals. I should have put more visuals in my presentation to give the audience to look at as when an audience can both hear and see what you are saying; they are more likely to retain the information as visual aids not only focus attention, they reinforce your words. pg. 66 AUDIENCE REACTION QUESTIONNAIRE & FEEDBACK These are two examples of feedback from the audience present at my presentation in the form of the questionnaire I designed. Sample 1: Sample 2: pg. 67 STUDENT PROJECT EVALUATION What were the main strengths and weaknesses of your Project? The main strengths of my project include my level of analysis as well as choosing an original and unique idea for the focus of my project. In addition to this, I used a number of sources that ranged from books, to online sources to interview. There were a number of these available and I liked to go through them and see the most resourceful, useful, and reliable to me. Another strength of my project is that I used a range of myths to support or oppose the arguments explored in my dissertation. The main weaknesses are the fact that the project it does not feature a lot of academics, which is something I would go about doing next time. Also, I feel that I could have followed the timings for the project plan a lot more closely and made more of an effort to meet the deadlines etc, as well as explore the figures of Medusa and Helen of Troy a bit more in the dissertation. What new skills did you learn/what new technologies did you use? This project has allowed me to develop my organisational skills, integrate original ideas of my own, in addition to learning how to cite and creating a bibliography. I have seen a number of these skills manifest in the stages up to the write up of the dissertation. I was also introduced to different areas of Google, such as Google Scholar where I was able to journals and papers) as well as Google Books to het a preview of some of the books I considered using in my project. My project has also improved my decisiveness, my ability to work and learn independently as well as problem solve, which I encountered many times throughout when attempting to meet deadlines for certain milestones and also when I lost my direction once or twice. My project was also great opportunity to integrate new technologies and apps that have proved both convenient and practical including RefMe, Instapaper, Evernote and Scribd. These were very useful in mu research as it allowed me the flexibility to continue with my project almost anywhere (provided my phone was charged). In doing your Project, what did you learn about yourself and the way in which you learn? I learned that I am able to do things quicker once I have a clear idea and detailed plan for writing. Also, once I make notes or make a list of what tasks I need to complete, as I will able to continue from where I left off. Being organised in terms of having documents printed out and drafting things on paper helps me a lot visually, as I was able to see what I had, what I still needed and what could be taken out. In addition to this, I realised that simplifying, highlighting and annotating sources was more efficient for me than writing out notes of large sections of text. pg. 68 Has your Project helped you in terms of your future plans? (e.g. study at university; career choices; going into employment) My project has given me an insight into the world of Ancient history, Ancient Greek society and also classical attitudes towards women shown through literature and the surviving and most popular tellings of myths. It has also helped me in terms of my future plans to study at university, by allowing me to sample what an independent project feels like, and skills that will prove useful in university like wring a dissertation, increased my ability to learn independently and familiarising myself with the Harvard referencing system. Most importantly though, the project has confirmed that it is an area I find very interesting and would like to pursue. If I was to start my Project again, what would I do differently and what would I keep the same? Do differently: Include more modern day approaches to women in Greek myth. Included feminist views, their reaction to the misogyny in Greek myth’ #;ology as well as their approach to it. Attempt to do some primary research of my own like get in touch with academics. Include some art or images of females. Start slightly earlier in terms of research (it was good that I had a plan from the summer but it still took some time to cut down and make the focus more specific. Try harder to work more closely to the project plan. Perhaps include more females, if space permitted it. Keep the same: The topic and project focus as I have enjoyed it a lot and have a real interest in it. The range of different sources I have used Any other comments? I found the project to be great for gaining experience at independent learning which is a skill that can be universally applied, in work, other independent research I may decide to do as well as in university. Initially, the extent of independence I had was difficult to grasp at first but once I got into my project, I gained greater confidence in my abilities to work independently as well as overcome challenges in my work with minimal guidance and assistance. pg. 69